Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/05

< Wikipedia:Requests for page protection‎ | Archive‎ | 2022
2022

01 May 2022

Drukpa Kagyu: Conversion by Karma Kagyu

Reason: I have carefully read the citations and corrected this section to reflect reality/facts and actual quotes. The previous text was so misleading I feel concerned that professional apologists may attempt to revert to the previous inaccuracies/propaganda. I will try to remember to pay attention, but have no interest in getting into an editing war. Please do what you can to protect the accurate representation of facts here. Thanks very much! Patrickwooldridge (talk) 20:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't preemptively protect pages. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Q-bit array

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Q-bit array is a ruwiki checkuser; looks like blocked users with grudges are coming over here to to troll him. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Elisa Lam

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 21:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Active abuse by IP. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 19:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Each IP involved has already been blocked. Since it's the Administrators' noticeboard, there are enough admins over there to take care of such situations pretty quickly. — Maile (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Jallow

Reason: I am requesting a page protection for the above subject on the ground of (fear of vandalism). Alphaj97 (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Self-immolation of Wynn Bruce

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and refusal to discuss by IPs. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 23:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 2 weeks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Acharya (2022 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Please protect this Telugu film article. Sai Raghavendra Puranam (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Continuous unsourced changes/vandalism by IPs, requiring a clean up every now and then. Previous request was declined due to a likely collateral damage but the current version covers the topic more comprehensively. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Too many vandals present that are disrupting the Plot section and the Release section. SP013 (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 01:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karađorđe

Reason: High level of 2 ip vandalism in last 24 Hours Theonewithreason (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Llanfairpwllgwyngyll

Reason: Vandalism in the past month. Enderman123456789 (talk) 03:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hog Farm Talk 03:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Hayward

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hog Farm: I see you're currently active, can you concider actioning this request. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Onewhoknowsbetter (talk · contribs) blocked by Hog Farm. - FlightTime - I've partially blocked the one editor causing problems here from editing the article and have left them a talk page message pointing them to Talk:Justin Hayward to try to get them to discuss the change instead of edit warring. Hog Farm Talk 03:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: I saw, thank you for your time. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mod creator

Reason: Very high risk of vandalism for newly registered users/IP users 🄼🄾🄳 🄲🅁🄴🄰🅃🄾🅁 (talk) 02:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. No history of vandalism. Your user page is protected by an edit filter to the same level as semi-protection in any case. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Britney

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flurry of vandalism from random-name accounts. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(sorry, hit the button too fast, suggest Pending Changes protection here as an option.) Tony Fox (arf!) 05:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. For one month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shamita Shetty

Reason: high level of IP Vandalism Vaishu1005 (talk) 07:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CBI 5: The Brain

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant change to movie review rating without any references. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 07:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese boat people

Reason: Sensitive topic and can easily be used for racist or discriminatory purposes. 118.210.121.230 (talk) 08:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., for sockpuppetry--Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulrahman Ibrahim Ibn Sori

Reason: IP disruption (repeated restoration of disputed content, unreferenced changes contradicted by the cited sources, removal of 'more references needed' cleanup tag without addressing it, and generally WP:OWN with no attempt at serious discussion, and now deletion from Talk of counter-opinions) by same editor using unstable IPs. A previously request over same page/editor in November 2021 led to block of individual IP, but they have simply showed up again under different IPs off and on since. Agricolae (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: several range blocks. Let me kow if they get around 'em --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism as settler colonialism

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 05:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC) 05:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

This article suggests that a fictional storyline had been portrayed in the film. This is not at all true the film is not fictional and is about the ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Kashmir by mulim extremists and separatists. So i suggest you edit the article and remove the above said "fictional"word from the narrative. 101.0.41.176 (talk) 07:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This article does not exist in the mainspace. — B. L. I. R. 08:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you're talking about this, then the edit will still not be done not only because the film is a work of fiction, but also because the plot of the film is partially based on false evidence in contrast to the actual history of the exodus. — B. L. I. R. 08:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmania

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by newly registered accounts. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 03:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 You beat me to it! Not sure if this is the same user creating new accounts, of it's just a coordinated group. Bizarre. PureRED | talk to me | 03:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Pascal

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unconfirmed/IP users. Had been protected in the past. Pending changes protection is warranted. Lard Almighty (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Fully protected for a period of 3 days due to a content dispute. Feel free to re-report when the full protection expires. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because .....

This description hurts the sentiment of the panit community and downplays the atrocities laid on them. The description should be changed to at least something neutral. However in the opinion of a hindu this is a genocide and history must remember it as one

The protection is intentionality put so that only one view of entire situation is read by all. This was a very notorious move on the part of the writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.161.98.254 (talk) 04:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The potential for disruption at this page is obvious. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: the information provided on wiki is always considered authentic but the article (The Kashmir Files) is terrible, everything written is fake and if of leftist mentality, I request access to edit the page as then majority people who support the truth can make a edit in it. You guys will suffer for your miss conduct people will never forgive you 49.204.162.153 (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The potential for disruption at this page is obvious. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... Discription of Kashmir Files Movie by Wikipedia is highly inaccurate and offensive to the victims of the Genocide, thus there should be repercussions against this false article. 112.79.255.189 (talk) 13:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The potential for disruption at this page is obvious. 13:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Malcolmxl5 (talk)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lucifer Valentine

Hello, I am requesting protection of the Lucifer Valentine page be removed. It has been barred from editing for almost 11 years. I made a case on the talk page, which I will copy here. I am requesting recreation as Lucifer Valentine has received significant media attention since this page was locked in 2011. He has made many new movies, committed crimes, and been given awards. Additionally, with the way this is set up, we would have to make several pages for each individual movie that all include information on him, rather than have 1 page that discusses him connected to the several movie pages. He was also in a documentary called Beyond Horror: The History and Sub-Culture of Red Films in 2019 which means he meets notability guidelines. He's also mentioned here , here and here . If he's notable enough to have a Fandago page and sell his 2015 movie (not in the Vomit Dolls triology) at Booksamillion, I'm sure he is notable enough for Wikipedia. He also has over 19 film credits now. Lucifer Valentine is a widely discussed topic on social media, has several film nominations, has been featured in documentaries, and there is extensive content on him Wikipedia would be able to cover. This would make it much more user-friendly for all of his movie pages and provide reliable information on a highly sought after topic. Perhaps he was not as notable in 2011 when this page was locked, but there is a case to be made for his notability now. CherriGasoline (talk) 04:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderofthePack: Pinging the protecting administrator ReaderofthePack. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't mind, but I highly suggest making a draft first and making sure that he passes notability guidelines. Keep in mind that having a Fandango page doesn't necessarily mean that someone is notable. Also, part of the issue here was that he was predominantly known for his Vomit Dolls trilogy, so the big emphasis here would be showing how he's notable for more than just that series. There are some self-published sources like blogs and so on that cover him, but coverage in places that Wikipedia would see as both reliable and notability giving are pretty slim. Some tend to focus on the Vomit Dolls trilogy or discuss his films as part of one ongoing series. Now that said, I do see coverage here and here, as well as at Ginger Nuts of Horror, which is good. But again, you need to establish how he's notable apart from his Vomit Dolls work. I highly recommend creating a draft before moving anything live and getting one of us to look it over - I don't mind taking a look. The page was deleted in the past so there's more chance that someone will try to renominate it unless it passes notability guidelines per WP:NBIO and has strong sourcing. There's a brochure on creating biography articles here that would definitely help with that. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CherriGasoline. ReaderofthePack has given you advice, essentially to create a draft of your proposed article - you can use WP:AFC for this. Can we close this now? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. OP has been given advice. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

It is not a fictional story , it is a documentary so please remove line [1][6] "to this film presents " remove" fictional "word. 223.225.57.235 (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Most likely you're talking about this article. A film based on a true story is not a documentary and will always have some inaccuracies when compared to the real event, the exodus. — B. L. I. R. 13:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

The Kashmir Files presents a factual story of genocide of a Kashmiri Hindus starting on 19.Jan.1990 The genocide is real and I am a Kashmiri Pandit Hindu and a testimony to that. Stating that it is a fiction and a notion is like stating that Hitler's atrocities were a fiction and only a notion. Please correct the below text

The film presents a fictional storyline[1][6] centered around an exodus of Kashmiri Hindus in the disputed region of Kashmir.[7][8] It depicts the early 1990s exodus[9] to be a genocide,[15] a notion that is widely considered inaccurate and associated with conspiracy theories.[16] 2402:4CC0:228:257:B08D:59B5:E840:14EB (talk) 11:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done IP is referring to this article. Potential conflict of interest and biased point of view. — B. L. I. R. 13:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

i have always trusted the content of this page, but have recently found an error related to a topic on this page. The page on The Kashmir Files on wikipedia says, "The film presents a fictional storyline[1][6] centered around an exodus of Kashmiri Hindus in the disputed region of Kashmir .It depicts the early 1990s exodus[9] to be a genocide,[15] a notion that is widely considered inaccurate and associated with conspiracy theories." I request the page editors to rectify such mistakes on the topic. To profe that the film was not frictional please refer to the following link 

https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/the-kashmir-files-1647244890-1

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/blunt-frank/the-kashmir-files/ 2409:4063:4C09:55EF:80E2:D1B9:C9DA:FC90 (talk) 13:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done IP is referring to this article. Please see above. IP seems to be confused between real life and based on real events. Please see Opinions are like arseholes. — B. L. I. R. 13:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salad Fingers

Temporary semi-protection: The subject of the recently-deleted article "David Firth," who is the creator of "Salad Fingers," took to Twitter to decry his article's deletion ([seen here]). It might be worth protectiong this article as a preventive measure. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 03:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see no recent disruptive editing that requires semi-protection at this time. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Firth

Reason: David Firth, who used to have an article on Wikipedia, has launched a Twitter campaign to retain his article for, what seems like, promotional purposes. The onslaught of angry followers has already begun (diff, diff, diff) and I'm sure there will be multiple attempts to re-create an article that won't be up to Wikipedia's notability standards. David Firth (animator) might need to be protected as well.

His tweets currently have tens of thousands of likes, so immediate administrator attention is certainly required, even if the pages won't be protected. Throast (talk | contribs) 07:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juice Leskinen

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I need to borrow some information from this. After that you may protect it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stan Lee 3000 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. It is not clear what you are talking about. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Instagram

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See page history. Disruptive editing by multiple IPs has continued after protection expired. — B. L. I. R. 02:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC). — B. L. I. R. 02:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the talk page history. It is very ugly — B. L. I. R. 03:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ron'Dell Carter

Reason: Position conflict. I cited a source backing it up 68.234.69.27 (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: This IP has filed multiple unsuccessful protection requests relating to either edit warring or reliable sources. @68.234.69.27: Remember, do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. This applies to both you and the other user, Hunterb212. Most likely your request will be declined. Both you and Hunter have been partially blocked by the same admin for edit warring. For this reason, RfPP is NOT the right place to stop edit warring. Please reach consensus using talk pages with the other user. Hunter tried to cooperate with you, but you are unwilling to do so by blanking the section. If you accuse me of lying, don't, because it will be in the page history for good unless an oversighter or admin removes a revision from view. I realized it's a slightly different IP for the diff (68.234.69.28), but both IPs have the same ISP. — B. L. I. R. 07:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Talk it out, reach agreement. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Encyclopedia

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please see talk page history. Inexperienced users with accounts and IPs have impulses to edit the page immediately instead of reading the edit notice. This vandalism has been occurring for a very, very long time and is still happening to this day. If feasible, extended confirmed might work as it will reduce the majority of vandalism on the talk page. — B. L. I. R. 08:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not protect talk pages indefinitely, and, to be honest, I do not see anything in the recent edits which should justify a short-term protection. Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Agreeing with Ymblanter above. We usually only semi-protect talk pages for very short periods due to extensive vandalism/disruptive editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Babamulla (talk) 18:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is put on the page just so no one can correct the wrong things written in it. The person whoever wrote the introduction tries to disregard the genocide of Kashmiri Hindus which occured in early 1990s.

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is put on the page just so no one can correct the wrong things written in it. The person whoever wrote the introduction tries to disregard the genocide of Kashmiri Hindus which occured in early 1990s.

The Kashmir Files is based upon true incidents which occurred in 1990s in which an estimated of 4,000 Kashmiri Pandits were brutally murdered by terrorist Islamist groups in Kashmir.

The film portrays what has actually happened in Kashmir during that time and how media, government and all the important institutions downplayed the whole thing.

This article is subject to the India/Pakistan/Afghanistan discretionary sanctions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The potential for disruption on that page is obvious. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Victorian rolling stock

Reason: User Murina77 keeps removing content from the page under the WP:WRITEITFIRST, effectively deleting content from the encyclopedia. Even if the page (even after I have removed the visible redlinks) doesn't currently exist, noting that the item of rolling stock once existed surely is what this encyclopedia is all about. This is one of the only complete lists of rolling stock from Victoria, Australia. Most other Australian railway related navigational boxes contain redlinks, as they are a work in progress, containing either rollingstock, stations, or train lines that are still redlinks. There are even navigational boxes that contain list of towns found is a specific area, that have redlinks. People haven't either had the time to get around to writing the article yet, or are in the process of trying to find a reliable source to make a worthwhile page and not just an empty stub. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 13:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I'm afraid a content dispute witha single editor does not warrant page protection. Please discuss with the other user --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chitral

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Template date vandalism by possible IP socks of User:Cipprex, [1] [2], [3], who is known for such activities [4] [5]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism continues [6]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Hehr

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – 3 different ip users have made the same unproven/uncited accusations about this person over the last week. Is this in the news again? May also want some of the reverted edits hidden (I'm unsure on this). Carver1889 (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Amadeus1999

Indefinite full protection: User request within own user space. Prevention of vandalism on my own userpage per WP:UP#PROTECT as I frequently counter vandalism, delete copyrighted material and other such things that frequently anger people. As such I believe I have a reasonable need to request protection (although I know prevention is not routinely protected, I believe WP:UPROT denotes some exceptions. I've already transcluded my userpage onto .css Thanks in advance for reviewing! ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 03:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23: Thank you for your response! I understand that usually the policy is not to protect pages pre-emptively, but as per consensus agreed upon here it seems that there is an exception to the rule as the conclusion of that discussion clearly states that:
"Per a request at WP:ANRFC, this discussion is closed with a consensus that users be allowed to preemptively protect pages in their user and user talk namespaces, but not their actual user talk page. -"
I am requesting that my user page (not my user talk page) as the consensus says, be protected due to high likelihood of future vandalism.
Thanks for your time and efforts. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 22:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please {{Ping}} if/when you respond so that I'm notified, I have the worst ADHD and I forget stuff like this exists, especially when I'm editing a lot. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 22:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Cook Islands

Reason: Persistent vandalism Bgsu98 (talk) 03:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khanates of the Caucasus

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing- IP continuously making incorrect/unsourced changes, and on multiple ranges so blocking would likely do nothing (IPs include 85.134.195.224, 85.134.237.83, and currently at 85.134.250.120). Magitroopa (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And just saw that they are similarly at SpongeBob SquarePants (season 3) now as well... Magitroopa (talk) 18:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Lebanese general election

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and the attempted propagation of personal political views rather than established facts. 961account (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The reporter and another user are edit-warring, and I've warned both. Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Scripps

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 ☎ 19:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Heard

Reason: I would like to add to the article. And update the page Sean cla (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most certainly not. It’s a volatile and vulnerable page and your intentions while unclear are very very dubious CreecregofLife (talk) 15:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emotion

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feeling

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feeling

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. same person who was on the "behaviour" article yesterday -- NotCharizard 🗨 20:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

The kashmir files is based on true story of barbaric exodus of kashmiri Hindus by religious fanatics backed by pakistan. Raviagrawaal83 (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Wikipedia is not a forum for you to vent your political/religious/ethnic emotions. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tamzin

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At this point the vandalism by IPs and sockpuppets, that is leading to rollbacks, and revdels and several sockstrikes (at least 4 so far), probably merit a semi-protection here. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Ask at WP:BN if you like. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's all under control. Heavily watched by many admins. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rakesh Sachan

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant test edits being done by an IP in main article, instead of sandbox or using preview. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Depp v. Heard

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandlistic, dynamic IP says in edit summaries they intent to keep edit warring until we "write protect", which I guess means semi-protect?. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

02 May 2022

Jackson Sousa

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent content removal by anonymous IP more than 3 reverts in last 24 hours. Lewolka (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a00:23c7:f481:1c01::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Deepfriedokra. Choosing not to semi-protect at this time. Not all IP editors are bad; one just reverted the last blanking. BusterD (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Olympus Has Fallen

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to refactor other users c comments. This has been going on for many months now. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Indefinite protection is not the solution to three months of disruption. User(s) blocked: 2.29.104.0/25 (talk · contribs) blocked by Sdrqaz. Three months' partial rangeblock. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Kashmiri files

Film is a fictional storyline to A film based on the events happened in the past, This film aims to represent all the pain suffered by Kashmiri Hindu during the exodus BrRcT (talk) 19:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Biased point of view. — B. L. I. R. 19:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Courtesy link: The Kashmir Files
Let me save you and everyone else some time: This article falls under the discretionary sanctions in place for edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and even if the page were to be unprotected at this juncture it would be almost summarily reprotected under the sanctions regime, which would make any future attempts at unprotection need to go thru WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (who take a dim view of polemics).
By the same token, any edits seeking to make edits either against an existing consensus, against the presently available sources, or to content that is in dispute will not be considered here or anywhere else, and Enforcement will not entertain such requests either except to possibly block you for trying to use it to "win" a content dispute by filing frivolous requests.
So as to make sure that you can't claim you didn't know anything about this in the future, I have formally alerted you to the existence of these sanctions, which means you are now subject to any user-level sanctions for misbehaviour in the topic area, including (but by no means limited to) edits about The Kashmir Files or any other controversy on the Subcontinent. Govern yourselves accordingly and stop wasting your time on this; the page will not be unprotected and the edits you're requesting will not be made. Find a different, less volatile, topic to write about. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... — B. L. I. R. 03:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

The points stated in the article seem to be of one particular individual/group and risen from opinions and not facts. It is therefore requested that Wikipedia shows what is in the film and not what the creator(s) of the film want/intend since we are dealing with facts and topics and the current article seems to be more interested in the intention of the movie makers rather than the movie itself, making it a propaganda article which it claims for the movie to be/spread.

Whereas from the below references it can be clearly understood that the movie/documentary was based on evidence and interview(s) with both the affected and local muslim population and is an attempt to bring out the truth and awareness in public domain, not to spread hatred but to address the needed and the happenings and their making.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35923237

https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/s7ljiw/benazir_bhuttos_1990_speech_that_marked_the/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VsDhlCBCD7Q&feature=youtu.be Indiangengiskhan (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: The Kashmir Files
The answer remains no. This page is still very much under discretionary sanctions for India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... — B. L. I. R. 03:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Their are many things that needs a edit some people are playing politics in the name of information. This movie is based on true story of genocide and some nonsense person changed it to a fiction and written some fake explaination please kindly check and edit this Lucky001L (talk) 23:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: The Kashmir Files
@Lucky001L: Let me save you and everyone else some time: This article falls under the discretionary sanctions in place for edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and even if the page were to be unprotected at this juncture it would be almost summarily reprotected under the sanctions regime, which would make any future attempts at unprotection need to go thru WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (who take a dim view of polemics).
By the same token, any edits seeking to make edits either against an existing consensus, against the presently available sources, or to content that is in dispute will not be considered here or anywhere else, and Enforcement will not entertain such requests either except to possibly block you for trying to use it to "win" a content dispute by filing frivolous requests.
So as to make sure that you can't claim you didn't know anything about this in the future, I have formally alerted you to the existence of these sanctions, which means you are now subject to any user-level sanctions for misbehaviour in the topic area, including (but by no means limited to) edits about The Kashmir Files or any other controversy on the Subcontinent. Govern yourselves accordingly and stop wasting your time on this; the page will not be unprotected and the edits you're requesting will not be made. Find a different, less volatile, topic to write about. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... — B. L. I. R. 03:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Makino

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 20:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table

Reason: I asked for protection a few weeks ago. It expired less than 24 hours and the IP vandals are back. Requesting protection for an extended period, if possible, please as I think this page is a magnet for vandals. CT55555 (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PRAXIDICAE💕 23:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Allera

Reason: Repeated vandalism. John a s (talk) 23:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This one seems particularly bad... WP:BLP and libelous claims. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 00:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not certain myself this subject needs an article, though I'm not going to prod it at this time. The lack of reliable sources makes this BLP a particularly vulnerable vandalism target. Let's try three months pending changes and see if we can source it. At the end, if it's still not sourced adequately, I might put it up for deletion, since there's no claim of notability anywhere near it. BusterD (talk) 03:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesbrough F.C.

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Pending changes instead of semi since IPs and new editors may change statistics (soccer/football team) ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 00:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Good recommendation. BusterD (talk) 03:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British protectorate

Reason: I would like to request that the British protectorate page be semi-protected for a period a six months, since a particular user keeps vandalizing the page to remove Afghanistan from the list of British protectorates. I have repeatedly provided multiple sources for the same inclusion of Afghanistan, as have other users, and yet the user Noorullah keeps changing and editing the article to remove Afghanistan without any valid reason. All the sources, both primary and secondary sources, and all the academic consensus is on the fact that Afghanistan was a British protectorate. This is the page in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_protectorate 69.143.174.241 (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Any protection may prevent the reporting IP editor from editing. I've applied pending changes as a minimum protection which may help solve the problem. I encourage the IP editor to consider creating an account. We always need fresh eyes. BusterD (talk) 03:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vukovar

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS. Years of myself and other users having to revert IP vandalism changing which country the town is located in and dozens of instances of Serbian Cyrillic being removed from the lead and infobox. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Insufficient disruption to justify semi protection at any expiration. Let's try pending changes first. BusterD (talk) 04:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Castellini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - AwfulReader(talk) 03:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 04:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Markos Botsaris

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS; years-long IP campaign attempting to change Botsaris's ethnicity in the lead and infobox. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try pending changes first. BusterD (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jalen Reagor

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 04:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Main Page toolbox/styles.css

Semi-protection: Used by semi-protected Template:Main page toolbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. If this protection is overmuch, please notify me. BusterD (talk) 04:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BusterD: The template protection is excessive, unless you also want to template protect the base page (Template:Main Page toolbox), which the CSS page clearly has the same risk level as. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. My script is giving me errors: (Tagging page: Failed to save edit: Invalid selector list at line 1 character 1). I'm still new at this, and my browser needed relaunching, but I'd appreciate any orientation provided. BusterD (talk) 04:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Smosh: The Movie

Reason: Many IP vandalism and misinformation throughout the years. Iamnoahflores (talk) 20:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User:2806:101E:3:AD14:B4C6:89B0:88ED:EA71 warned. BusterD (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

End of the Road World Tour

Reason: On-off editing, occasionally changing music venues to another that the band are not going to perform in. No reliable sources are being used when changing the venues despite sources already showing they are performing in the venues they are meant to be performing at. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism seems to have gone down. However, looking at the history, a lot of edits to the page have been reverted, so semi is probably the way, Cranloa12n / talk / contribs / 00:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: pinging the protecting administrator Ferret for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely against lowering protection on this article. The argument that vandalism has gone down is hollow. It's down due to protection. The talk page is regularly vandalized, to the point that it's been protected several times as well, and is currently protected till the end of May. There isn't a particular high number of constructive edit requests. -- ferret (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa Raza Khan Qadri

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Terrible edit war, must enact a protect immediately to stop them. PAVLOV (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination they stopped... PAVLOV (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor See above. — B. L. I. R. 03:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Opera House

Reason: Vandalism. Enderman123456789 (talk) 03:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy links on this page. Thank you for the better report this time. Glad to see your datestamp. BusterD (talk) 04:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

The Kashmir Files

Totally incorrect discription given about movie when you say it is a "fictional movie". Kashmiri Pandits have lost lost there lives, their sisters have been raped, children have been killed & Wikipedia calls it a fictional movie. Please do some research like the creators of this movie did before writing any such things or don't allow biased people to hack Wikipedia otherwise Wikipedia will only become a place for creating fake narratives. Propoganda Killer (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Propoganda Killer: Let me save you and everyone else some time: This article falls under the discretionary sanctions in place for edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and even if the page were to be unprotected at this juncture it would be almost summarily reprotected under the sanctions regime, which would make any future attempts at unprotection need to go thru WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (who take a dim view of polemics).
By the same token, any edits seeking to make edits either against an existing consensus, against the presently available sources, or to content that is in dispute will not be considered here or anywhere else, and Enforcement will not entertain such requests either except to possibly block you for trying to use it to "win" a content dispute by filing frivolous requests.
So as to make sure that you can't claim you didn't know anything about this in the future, I have formally alerted you to the existence of these sanctions, which means you are now subject to any user-level sanctions for misbehaviour in the topic area, including (but by no means limited to) edits about The Kashmir Files or any other controversy on the Subcontinent. Govern yourselves accordingly and stop wasting your time on this; the page will not be unprotected and the edits you're requesting will not be made. Find a different, less volatile, topic to write about. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 04:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done See above. In a nutshell, there is a discretionary sanction to prevent controversial swaying of consensus and neutral point of view. — B. L. I. R. 06:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you say that there is a sanction on edits related to controversial topics than Wikipedia should be 100% sure how true there descriptions are on that controversial topic. The details provided by Wikipedia on The Kashmir files is absolutely incorrect, not based on any facts & just promotes fake narrative & terrorism. I hope Government of India takes action against this & gets Wikipedia correct its course of action.

@Propoganda Killer: Threats like that are grounds for an immediate block irrespective of discretionary sanctions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 08:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain, how is that a that a threat ? Is questioning something called a threat in Wikipedia's dictionary? Infact you are misusing your powers by threatening to block me, which is totally against my free speech right.

@Propoganda Killer: In what language is "I want the government to shut you down if I don't get my way" not a legal threat? Also, your free speech rights here are limited to whatever Wikipedia's owners see fit to permit, same with any other privately-owned website, business, restaurant, or residence. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 08:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GOI of India is not friend that it will do whatever I want infact they will do what is required to correct wrongdoings like what Wikipedia has done in the this case & what you are trying to do by bullying me here. Spreading fake news & propoganda is entertained by no democratically elected govt. & neither GOI will accept this.

Not done. This is not a place for misinformed commentary about an article nor a place for making threats. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zenica

Reason: Persistent reverts by unregistered user, for no clear reason. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 5.43.84.70 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. Blocked for 72 hours. BusterD (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: The information captured is factually incorrect and inflammatory in nature 103.120.41.4 (talk) 06:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen this requested dozens of times for that reason but it's never explained how. But also why not just make an edit request? Don't demolish security when you can just leave a message with specific instructions for what needs to be changed CreecregofLife (talk) 06:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Let me save you and everyone else some time: This article falls under the discretionary sanctions in place for edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and even if the page were to be unprotected at this juncture it would be almost summarily reprotected under the sanctions regime, which would make any future attempts at unprotection need to go thru WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (who take a dim view of polemics).
By the same token, any edits seeking to make edits either against an existing consensus, against the presently available sources, or to content that is in dispute will not be considered here or anywhere else, and Enforcement will not entertain such requests either except to possibly block you for trying to use it to "win" a content dispute by filing frivolous requests.
So as to make sure that you can't claim you didn't know anything about this in the future, I have formally alerted you to the existence of these sanctions, which means you are now subject to any user-level sanctions for misbehaviour in the topic area, including (but by no means limited to) edits about The Kashmir Files or any other controversy on the Subcontinent. Govern yourselves accordingly and stop wasting your time on this; the page will not be unprotected and the edits you're requesting will not be made. Find a different, less volatile, topic to write about.
@CreecregofLife: The film has become a target for Hindu nationalists who don't appreciate the film's POV and consider it to be propaganda. This is just the most aggressive it's been in the past few months. I suspect that the talk page got protected for the same reasons as Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput did. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 07:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The potential for disruption at this page is obvious. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Shivesh95 (talk) 08:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir Files is a movie based upon true events that were suffered by the Kashmiri Pandit community resulting in the massacre and their exodus from the valley. Kashmir was initially a literary place for the Hindus, and had the famous Sharda peeth which was a University, where Hindus from across the Indian subcontinent came to study and graduated themselves as Pandits. Over several centuries, the Hindu community in the valley were religiously persecuted and massacred. The events of 1989 were the 7th exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the valley.

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shivesh95: Let me save you and everyone else some time: This article falls under the discretionary sanctions in place for edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and even if the page were to be unprotected at this juncture it would be almost summarily reprotected under the sanctions regime, which would make any future attempts at unprotection need to go thru WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (who take a dim view of polemics).
By the same token, any edits seeking to make edits either against an existing consensus, against the presently available sources, or to content that is in dispute will not be considered here or anywhere else, and Enforcement will not entertain such requests either except to possibly block you for trying to use it to "win" a content dispute by filing frivolous requests.
So as to make sure that you can't claim you didn't know anything about this in the future, I have formally alerted you to the existence of these sanctions, which means you are now subject to any user-level sanctions for misbehaviour in the topic area, including (but by no means limited to) edits about The Kashmir Files or any other controversy on the Subcontinent. Govern yourselves accordingly and stop wasting your time on this; the page will not be unprotected and the edits you're requesting will not be made. Find a different, less volatile, topic to write about. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 08:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The potential for disruption at this page is obvious. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joravarsinh Jadav

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism of early life info. Nizil (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anangpal Tomar

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 06:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ankitjat00fadaswo (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mutant

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Mutantofficial (talk) 07:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nayak (caste)

Reason : the page has been changed beyond recognition, recent activity suggests some kind of regular unsourced content being added there.RS6784 (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Divock Origi

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 13:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Less Unless (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Minecraft

Reason: Change from semi-protected to pending-changes so IPs can make edit requests (but they have to be approved first). Enderman123456789 (talk) 03:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CRASHlock is not available for talk pages, if I am not mistaken. Even if it were, a large volume of edits makes it unworkable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 04:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. It is not technically possible for talk pages to be placed on pending changes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of U.S. states and territories by Human Development Index

Reason: For some reason, IPs keep removing Japan from the list of comparable countries. As you can see from the “List of countries by Human Development Index” article, Japan has the same score as Israel and Liechtenstein, so it should be listed as a comparable county to Ohio and Michigan along with them. I have no idea why this person or people wants Japan to be removed, but they’ve done it three times now.VictimOfEntropy (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I’m sorry if this messes up the format, but I want to add that I think this anonymous vandal found a way to change their IP address because I mentioned that it was the same vandal as before when I undid their removal of Japan for the second time.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Warn them for edit warring and/or removing content without a source and then report if it continues. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Taboritsky

Reason: High level of vandalism BorderRegions (talk) 08:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karađorđe

Reason: High level of ip vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Karim185.3 (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:XXXTentacion

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dračevo, Skopje

Reason: Reason: High level of disruptive editing from a set of edit-warring IPs and one recently blocked newly registered editor. WP:SPA: WP:NATIONALIST. Jingiby (talk) 14:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah McCoy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 15:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duane Washington Jr.

Reason: vandalizing biography and nationality because of his dual citizenship 46.161.108.141 (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious. Not happening. False accusations of vandalism are considered WP:Personal attacks. – 2.O.Boxing 14:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution.. And no talk of vandalism please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Krasinski filmography

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continue adding in rumored role after being reverted and told to add only with reliable sourcing. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fano (militia)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it contains false allegations. It completely contradicts with the fact on the ground. Yaschelewal (talk) 14:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Editing of this page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as a result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of presidents of Sri Lanka

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No pages have been moved. It looks like an edit war over a redirect. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5: My bad. Can something be done to prevent the disruption (another 3 reverts by the IP since I filed this report)? Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked, a straightforward violation of the three-revert rule. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrann Mathieu

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Patrushev

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Star Jalsha

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism and addition of false information with fake URLs by multiple IPs. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 04:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I do this reluctantly, because I also see IP accounts making constructive edits to the page. Maybe they should be encouraged to register accounts. MelanieN (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zee Bangla

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism and addition of false information with fake URLs by multiple IPs. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 04:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Itcouldbepossible I found an IP changing colours for columns in tables non-constructively and reverted to last stable version. 42.110.197.223 (talk) 06:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Amadeus1999

Indefinite full protection

Reason: Previous denied on (in my view) incorrect grounds, I'll include the text I posted in a comment in the archived version:
@Bbb23: Thank you for your response! I understand that usually the policy is not to protect pages pre-emptively, but as per consensus agreed upon here it seems that there is an exception to the rule as the conclusion of that discussion clearly states that: "Per a request at WP:ANRFC, this discussion is closed with a consensus that users be allowed to preemptively protect pages in their user and user talk namespaces, but not their actual user talk page. -" I am requesting that my user page (not my user talk page) as the consensus says, be protected due to high likelihood of future vandalism. Thanks for your time and efforts. Also, please {{Ping}} if/when you respond so that I'm notified, I have the worst ADHD and I forget stuff like this exists, especially when I'm editing a lot.
From my previous request. The reason I'm making a new request is of course because you're technically not supposed to edit archives and they might not respond. Hence my re-request, thanks for your time. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 23:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: . Our protection policy says quite clearly: User pages and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. Pages within the user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause. (bolding is my emphasis). Looking at the history of the page, I do not see that "a need exists" nor that there is "good reason or cause" for protection. The page is already protected by an edit filter to the same level as semi-protection and I do not consider that full protection is needed at this time. I am inclined to decline this request. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Just noting that I agree with Malcolmxl5 that this should be declined. Absent some extenuating circumstances (such as persistent abuse from confirmed socks) user pages aren't fully protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I as well. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per unanimous admin statements. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas MacArthur

Change A day after his arrival in San Francisco from Korea on 18 April 1951, to A day after his arrival in San Francisco from Tokyo on 18 April 1951, Rippertel (talk) 14:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What page is this, Rippertel? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5: Pretty sure it's Douglas MacArthur#Later life. Can't access the source, so I don't know from where he flew to SF. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that must be it. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – @Rippertel: Please use an edit request at Talk:Douglas MacArthur to request the change. It would be helpful, in fact required, to provide a reliable source for your claim. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper Soloff

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring between an autoconfirmed account and an IP on an unsourced BLP date of birth. The autoconfirmed account has added a source to the Google knowledge panel believing it to be a reliable source. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elvana Gjata

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent removal of sourced content without consensus on talk page. Mightberight (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.. Sockpuppet blocked by Widr. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trai Turner

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Katietalk 20:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kunduz hospital airstrike

Reason: I requested this a few weeks ago, the page got it, protection ended, and within 24 hours people are POV pushing. This is an ongoing issue. Requesting protection from IP edits for as long as you can give it please. CT55555 (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @CT55555: If you'd like pending changes reviewer, let me know and I'll give it to you. Katietalk 20:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thanks for the offer. I would welcome that. User:KrakatoaKatie CT55555 (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bath Rugby

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, over the last 2 days, of a rugby club facing relegation with two games left in the season. The vandalism is probably going to continue for the remainder of the season. Last game looks to be 4th June which is a bit long for a block (no idea if there are alternatives that can be deployed instead). Carver1889 (talk) 18:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should get you past June 4. Katietalk 21:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of epidemics

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03 May 2022

Malayalam cinema

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, persistent WP:TRIVIA. SnehaRaphael1996 (talk) 08:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 20:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One Thousand and One Nights

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – POV pushing by users without auto confirmation. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Your disruptive editor is already autoconfirmed and I do not want to put ECP on this page. Warn him, then take him to AN3 if necessary. Katietalk 21:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One IP was blocked, now disruption has resumed from different IP. See 14:15 edit summary. MB 21:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Borneo

Reason: High level of changes against MOS. Would consider myself involved. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: Semi-protection won't work here since a lot of the edit warring is from registered accounts. Either we warn them more stringently for edit warring than we have, or go for full protection. Is that what we want? It would be rather drastic. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The edit-warring has continued on this article, along with many of the other Survivor pages. Bgsu98 (talk) 22:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll see what this does. Daniel Case (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Online chat

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly edited by mobile app users hoping to chat. John of Reading (talk) 09:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@John of Reading: Given it's a talk page I'd prefer not to protect it indefinitely but I understand the reason you're asking. I won't decline this in case another admin is happy to indef semi it, but it might be best to ask on AN so a discussion can take place. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, I am happy to semi it - not indefinitely at this time but I think it probably should be in the future. The talk page is very heavily edited, but literally all the edits are from IPs or new editors who think this is a place to chat or make test edits. The regular editors who cover that article spend all their time reverting that kind of edit. Waste of their time, and bad experience for new editors. If someone wants to take it to AN I will defend my decision. MelanieN (talk) 02:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of shopping malls in California

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by IP users that do not adhere to WP:NPOV. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of U.S. states and territories by Human Development Index

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. My request for protection was denied because I was told that there wasn’t enough recent vandalism, and now the same IP vandal has struck again twice while I was sleeping.VictimOfEntropy (talk) 16:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know how to sign this comment with my username, but this is VictimOfEntropy and I’m adding that I think this page needs to be permanently protected in that way that prevents IPs from editing a page, because this vandal switches their IP address constantly, so blocking them wouldn’t work, and they’re persistent, and they’ve shown that they’ll wait for months, obviously constantly watching for anyone to undo the ways in which they’ve falsely presented the information from the HDI study/studies, and there doesn’t seem to be any users watching the page except for me. I didn’t think that I’d need to add this page to my watchlist when I undid this anonymous person’s vandalism the first time, and I wouldn’t have caught it the second time if I hadn’t happened to go back to that page. Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictimOfEntropy (talk • contribs) 16:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VictimOfEntropy: User(s) blocked. I have given a three-month range-block to those IPs, since they're clustered together. I will add it to my watchlist and see if it is effective. You can sign your posts by adding ~~~~ to them. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaakad

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Md Adnan (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wasatch Front

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. KidAd • SPEAK 22:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhoi Su-34

Temporary semi-protection: - Reason: Disruptive and unsourced changes made by various IP users. Mr.User200 (talk) 00:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Expendables 4

Reason: Move protection: A user is mistakenly believing that the title stylization is the actual title, when even a Deadline article published this morning calls it The Expendables 4. The user has moved it twice and I suspect they will continue to do so. They have a habit of adding cast or plot details completely unsourced and wedging it behind pre-existing sources that don't have such info CreecregofLife (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is about the Reed Richards and Black Bolt edits, that was footage leaked on Twitter, John Krasinski and Anson Mount are literally in the Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness film as those characters, that is very real. The Expendables 4 is titled Expend4bles with a 4 instead of an A: BarrySteakfries (talk) 16:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BarrySteakfries: please don't move the page again. Start a requested move discussion instead. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah no that’s not how it works. They didn’t announce the title, they revealed its stylization. I’m sorry you can’t see that.--CreecregofLife (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There literally say "The Next Expendables Is Officially Called Expend4bles" and "The Expendables 4 Gets A Title That’s Not Actually Expendables 4". That is how it works all the time, like with 2 Fast 2 Furious, Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa, Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood, Pokémon 4Ever, it goes on and on. BarrySteakfries (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did Universal say that it's officially titled Expend4bles, or did the article writers make assumptions? Because right now you're making a false equivalency, because each of those examples substitute an actual word in the title, like "To" and "For", making them actually nothing alike CreecregofLife (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I'm going to hold off here since there's an RM discussion now underway. If disruption persists, feel free to request protection again. Katietalk 20:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: BarrySteakfries (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo.. Turns out Barry was a sock, and it was not the turn I was expecting. I've never used the RFPP response templates before tonight (because I don't have the powers for action, I thought they were off limits), but this at least felt appropriate CreecregofLife (talk) 00:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh Pirates

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abd al-Mu'min

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. M.Bitton (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MelanieN: I hope you won't mind, but I saw that you active on this page and wondered whether you wouldn't mind having a look at this case. Many thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 02:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any need for Extended Confirmed protection. MelanieN (talk) 05:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Limitless Win

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors repeatedly making a very specific edit to the reception section. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Skylit Drive

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent BLP violations, with primary source documents cited from a court proceeding. Binksternet (talk) 23:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. One of the disputants has been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 02:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

George Springer

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 23:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: The writer of the article is spreading misinformation - allow crowdsourcing to fix the numerous inaccuracies about the film 50.93.222.82 (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Sigh. Here's a selection of previous decrease requests. It is a very volatile page and contains no misinformation. Unprotecting the page would only cause to produce misinformation in the name of "correction" CreecregofLife (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m almost wondering if we should make it a spiritually pinned request, to deter further. Unless the reason for archiving is for them not to build a case and have to start over every time… which I guess makes sense CreecregofLife (talk) 02:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Reason: Should be semi-protected for a week in anticipation of tomorrow's news storm. bender235 (talk) 02:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. If indeed there is a vandalism storm tomorrow, it can be protected at that time. MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Lafreniere

Reason: Continuous slander over an extended period of time. 172.103.229.100 (talk) 05:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in Sweden

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Edit history will show that the article has been a target for months by an editor active from Indonesia persistently removing the terms Protestantism and Church of Sweden, amongst other things. They constantly hop IP's to avoid blocks so hoping that a couple of months or so of semi-protection would at the very least force them to make use of talk page. TylerBurden (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-header

Reason: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Signpost-header is template-editor protected but this weird redirect (which SIgnpost articles use) only has autoconfirmed protection, that largely defies the template-editor protection on the target. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The bot will automatically protect it when it reaches the 5000 transclusions threshold for template editor protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhumi Pednekar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chevrolet Enjoy

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:800:63b6:febf:64e4:b3ad:c047:f03 (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given the problematic history of the page and no apparent reason to edit the redirect, I’d say no. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – just like the previous times you asked. When will you get the message? Favonian (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Collins

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection for one week: as the swing vote in a SCOTUS nominee that has overturn Roe v. Wade I expect this page to be vandalized repeatedly in the near future. While only one vandal has appeared so far, the page has been vandalized before. There has been unrelated IP vandalism on her page for the past month as well but I think protection should be as short as necessary and somewhat purposeful in this case. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 07:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diff, vandalism since request. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 12:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 15:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buzz Lightyear

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 10:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avianca Brasil

Reason: This protection is no longer necessary and protected since 17 June 2019. I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again. M.FirasBukhari (talk) 11:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.FirasBukhari: Unrelated to the overall decrease request, but as you are autoconfirmed, you should be able to edit the article anyway. (Non-administrator comment) FozzieHey (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yaris678: pinging the protecting administrator Yaris678 for their input. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. It was originally protected for edit warring. This should be long enough. Yaris678 (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doc Rivers

Reason: Persistent vandalism and edit warring from an IP range. – 2.O.Boxing 09:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal national football team

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism, both pro and anti-Cristiano Ronaldo, as well as the Penaldo vandalism articles that mention him often attract. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Day

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In what used to be a yearly ritual for me to revert vandalism (and I only needed this page on my watchlist for a few days a year), my new tradition is RPPing it, starting a little early this year, but please protect this page for non-autoconfirmeds until May 7: Page gets no traffic, and hence no little vandalism once "May the Fourth", "May the Fifth", and "Revenge of the Sixth" variants have passed. Thanks. JesseRafe (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles aren't protected pre-emptively. I'm not an admin however so that's their decision. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Kallarangatt

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. One of the IP ranges involved replaced most of the article with promotional content copy-pasted form a church website. - SUN EYE 1 12:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blanchey

Indefinite semi-protection: I want to avoid having my userpage being potentially vandalised by anonymous users as it has been happening to others recently. Thanks. Blanchey (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Unnecessary. Your user page is already protected by an edit filter to the level of semi-protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Blanchey (talk) 14:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also pages are not protected pre-emptively. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Vito

Reason: The actress' current profile is Michelle R. Vito and the article already has a source and right information. Bbsalexa2366 (talk) 12:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Article was deleted at AfD. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

Reason: Persistent IP disruption – This has been going on for weeks. The article was protected, the IP returned after the protection expired. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Putin

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple disputes over multiple issues... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kira Reed

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring over possible adult movies earlier in her career with horrible sourcing. Please protect for now until some sort of consensus can be reached, and better sources offered so at least the edit war stops. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mileva Marić

Reason: Slow (once a day) vandalism by a dynamic IP hovering around 178.12[0 or 1].xxx.xxx adding a statement to the lead that Mileva Marić is author of the Theory of Relativity. Mathglot (talk) 08:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Representation of the People Act 1918

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shamshera

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Md Adnan (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luchasaurus

Reason: Persistent unsourced edits Hunterb212 (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ty Dolla Sign

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 10:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Margarita Simonyan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manoto

This paragraph below is not true and is defamatory. no evidence has been provided, and it must be removed: 'It is known that the channel is funded by the Israeli and United States governments to spread negative sentiments among Iranians toward Iran's government while promoting Iran's ousted monarchy' Also, this paragraph : 'However, many Iranian analysts believe that the channel is funded by the Israeli and US governments to propagate negative sentiments amongst the Iranian population toward Iran's government while promoting Iran's ousted monarchy.' VAHID MAHDAVI 09:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

The talk page of the article is not protected; why not ask there politely instead of demanding the rights to edit the page? Especially as this seems to be framed under one of two discretionary sanctions regimes, either one of which is a complete nightmare on an average day and doesn't need more firebrands. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 09:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This page is indefinitely protected because it falls under a special subject area (post-1978 Iranian politics) that attracts a lot of controversy and disputes. Therefore, it is unlikely to be unprotected anytime soon. If you'd like to edit this article, you need to become extended-confirmed, which mean you must have a registered account that is at least 30 days old, and has made at least 500 edits. Otherwise, if you'd like to influence this article, my advice would be to start a discussion on the article's talk page, clearly laying out which sentences you believe are problematic, what you'd propose to change (i.e. would you just delete those sentences altogether, or replace them with alternate sentences?), along with any sources required to back up your position. Note that both sentences that you're contesting are referenced to a source, although that source is behind a paywall so I can't see it. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple users over the past week. Areaseven (talk) 14:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spokane, Washington

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – New users (possibly a sockpuppet/master)continues to add unsourced information to the article, all of which include the addition of a random name and unreferenced fact. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 20:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Wood

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We keep getting IP or non-autoconfirmed editors adding this joke edit in the intro: know for his portrayals of "The Guy" in Spy Kids 3: Game Over. Peaceray (talk) 20:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 21:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04 May 2022

Durga

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nor would semi-protection have any effect as the two editors disagreeing are registered accounts. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Becker

Temporary semi-protection: Some BLP violations in recent days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rudy Giuliani

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent Persistent Vandalism. Taxin609 (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. WP:ACDS/AP2 -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Restoring edits by serial sockpuppeteer Thakor_Sumant_Sinhji_Jhala. MrOllie (talk) 23:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fano (militia)

Reason: The definition is not right it's full of false information & it must be edited to the right meaning 197.156.73.162 (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is protected as a result of Horn-of-Africa-region discretionary sanctions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Editing of this page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as a result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA). Favonian (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahathir Mohamad

Reason: Persistent and repetitive IP vandalism. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Women

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA from a dynamic IP sock vandal. – DarkGlow • 12:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also threw around some blocks. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BBC One 'Lens' idents

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated reinstatement of excessive, trivial content by confrontational IP editors. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Phillips (murderer)

Reason: Repeated vandalism from multiple IP addresses targeting specific editor. For many years there has been a lone editor, operating from multiple IP addresses, who attempts to remove the fact the victim's mother states the victim and the subject of the article were friends prior to the murder. This is well sourced, and I do not understand why the IP editor has a problem with it. However, since I keep reverting their unexplained removal of referenced content, the IP editor now repeatedly vandalizes the article to place my name in the text. While these edits are not constant, it's disturbing that someone is deliberately publicly attacking me, and an IP block will be insufficient as they operate from multiple addresses. I am therefore requesting indefinite protection of the page to stop personal attacks. I feel this would be a good idea in general anyway as the page has previously been temporarily protected multiple times to protect from vandalism, which has been ongoing for years now. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of 4DX motion-enhanced films

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs persistently adding content without providing sources. DonIago (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issyk kurgan

Unprotection: Article was protected for an edit war in 2009. The page has not seen major editing in a while and the protection is no longer serving a purpose. Protecting administrator: User:Dbachmann Terasail[✉️] 21:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne

Short-term protection: Vandalism this week, the history is full of reverts. Enderman123456789 (talk) 00:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption is from about a week ago, recent reverts seem like normal editing. I'll watch and protect if things get worse otherwise make another request should the IP return. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 276

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Katyn massacre memorials

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/GRP target, will not back out of edit warring. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Opera House

Reason: Vandalism by IPs. This IP has added stupid, weird and sexual descriptions of Hitler (see the edit history) to the performances section. This was on 29 April. Plus heaps of other vandalism. Enderman123456789 (talk) 01:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing has changed since you asked yesterday. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Celeste Cortesi

Reason: persistent IP vandalizers are back after the article's protection expired few days ago. Requesting for higher protection level. Vandalized edits were already fixed/reverted but may vandalized by IP editors if protection won't be placed on the article. ZZSWKX (talk) 04:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophical methodology

Reason: IP keeps edit waring by adding inappropriate external link and uses personal attacks in edit summaries, see [7], [8], [9], & [10]. The person seems to be using a proxy: each IP used gets blocked soon after the edit was made. Phlsph7 (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Crowder

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations, and disruptive editing. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsha Khan

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content is being added by Ip editors repeatedly. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Reason: this template was protected for being highly visible. However, only template editors and administrators can edit it, which I find excessive. Navboxes of several other organizations such as Template:European Union topics or Template:United Nations do not have such a high level of protection, so I am requesting this template's protection to be reduced so that extended confirmed users can edit it. I apologize by the way if this is not the correct place to request decrease in protection for templates, redirect me to the correct place if so. Super Ψ Dro 20:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyp since you protected the template. I don't see a reason for more than semi-protection. Galobtter (pingó mió) 21:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I lean towards keeping protection as is but could be persuaded for lower. While it's not "highly visible" in terms of transclusion count, it's used on some of our most viewed articles. It got protected following some particularly bad vandalism that I won't get into for WP:BEANS reasons, but suffice to say that vandalism to it is probably on par with more widely used templates in terms of scale. @Galobtter: thoughts? — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wugapodes I think ECP protection would be appropriate then, so regular editors can still edit the template. Galobtter (pingó mió) 02:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Melendez

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High IP vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nish Kumar

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Ongoing vandalism of a comedian's biography, seems like a 75/25 mix of people who don't like his work adding variations on "not funny" to the lead, and people who do like his work adding in-jokes like fake pseudonyms. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jaimal Singh

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Basrasaab and IPs (likely the same person) adding/readding honorifics contravening WP:NCIN and MOS:HON, as well as unsourced content. [11], [12], [13], [14] [15] [16]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Toyah Battersby

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring on infobox. – DarkGlow • 10:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Domingue

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Will watch the article and block user if they continue vandalising. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spotted dick

Pending changes protection: Ongoing vandalism/troll hits from IPs in “drive-by” fashion (as in not any one specific user per se), but more so once or twice a month on average from some random IP. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 06:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most recent edit to the page was in March. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:06, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shontel Brown

Reason: Controversial topic prone to abuse CarlSerafino (talk) 09:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 13:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan

I was to edit the page for Taiwan. I think it is unfair that they think Taiwan is a part of China since they left China and have been independent for years Presleyisweird1 (talk) 00:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Your request for an edit to be made is too vague. I suggest you start a discussion on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SK (disambiguation)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SK

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SK Group

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian David Cheok

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per past page protections, Australian IP addresses are again trying to remove sourced details from this biography, and add details of Cheok's latest press release. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. He won't be back for a year at that /64. If he returns as a sock, SPI is thataway. Katietalk 14:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Again content dispute. A user is removing the image leaving the discussion in between. They are misinterpreting the words of admin.[17] Heba Aisha (talk) 08:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The concerned editor who has asked for protection crossed 3RR on the page despite the fact that they were told on talk page of the article regarding the previous discussion with an Admin. Nevertheless, I also request for admin page protection on the page for a brief period. RS6784 (talk) 12:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Abecedare. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nivia Sports

Reason: To stop vandalism, copyright infringement Raavi Mohanty 09:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 14:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Elrich

Reason: Frequent edits made appearing to come from political opponents. Characterizations of housing positions are under dispute and frequently misinterpret source material. Inna12724 (talk) 12:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Fair warning, though: if you're the reporter, you'll have your own conduct examined, and you could end up blocked yourself as you've violated 3RR. Katietalk 14:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco Giants

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new account. Storchy (talk) 14:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of the baseball season (6 months), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dianne dela Fuente

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 16:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taga za Yug

Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 17:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Max Homa

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Sotto

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 17:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Pandya

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two times the page was protected for short time and user(s) make disruptive edit and not ready to accept facts. We can't warn or talk with the user since it comes from various IPs. Could you protect for long period (more than 6 months)?. AntanO 09:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Going for a bit longer this time. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rubin Carter

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting RPP, or alternatively a range block on IP, due to persistent disruptive editing: removing wording agreed upon via talk page. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taíno

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2603:7080:906:20C7:8DEF:1F14:3C13:7238 (talk) 05:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The protection isn't necessary, it shouldn't have been put in to affect in the first place. A Taíno tribe has just been officially recognized, proving what we've been saying all along.

The page was protected due to persistent disruptive editing. If you have suggestions for improving the article, make them - with sources - on the article talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected. The period of protection has expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Zampolli

Reason: External threat of malicious edits. Page currently is adherent to wikipedia standards, but explitict threats have been made outside of this site to do damage to the page. Jamesmw90 (talk) 14:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sahle-Work Zewde

Reason: Temporary protection is needed especially against IP's. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mobile Device Management software

Reason: High level of product promotion, regular inclusion of non-notable product entries, high level of WP:COI FlashWikipedian (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Limitless Win

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by IP and newly registered editors. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did see a request pass through here for it recently (May 2-3), and it was declined. Did it worsen since then? CreecregofLife (talk) 20:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CreecregofLife: Edit warring by Oracle987654321 continued after the first request. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection won't hurt. The user is blocked, but only for 24 hours. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enneahedron

Reason: This page is very infrequently edited, only being edited once in 2021. The editors warring over this page in 2016 have likely forgotten about said edit war. Computerfan0 (talk) 15:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David Eppstein: pinging the protecting administrator David Eppstein for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Agree that the reason for protection is stale. If it starts up again we can always semiprotect it again. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected - for the bot. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Audiovisual Communicators

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Perennial LTA target; see WP:LTA/Bertrand101 for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The previous five edits to the page go back to October 2021. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 18:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Putin

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial political figure involved in a current conflict. Subject to Recent Vandalism. Taxin609 (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Deepfriedokra. 😉
Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant to go back after my FP wore off. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: This version is not accurate and not in line with facts, hence request to let me update 157.38.116.93 (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The potential for disruption at this page is obvious. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05 May 2022

Accurin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive editing by various non-autoconfirmed editors. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aman.kumar.goel: What's the issue here? The talk page has no activity, the user who's been making those edits has a redlinked talk page, and I don't see how it's vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Melnyk (ambassador)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations from ip addresses since March that also impact a page covered under WP:ARBEE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sally Ride

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IP and recently-created vandalism-only accounts Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Confetti Tour

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of previous editing behaviours which stemmed from previous a protection, which lifted less than 24-hours ago. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uka (singer)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please look at history. - AwfulReader(talk) 23:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low level of editing but most IP edits have been disruptive. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoonito (American programming block)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User is continuing to add Happy Tree Friends. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Botez

Reason: Recently it seems like every other day I have to revert new/unregistered users' additions to this BLP that fail WP:NPOV or WP:V, e.g. loaded text, mentioning things she said just to contradict them, whatever this noise is, etc. A chronic issue is tons of different people adding and re-adding an uncited birth date in clear violation of WP:DOB, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, and the icing of someone making me watch a video just to discover it wasn't in the source: 5. Note that this activity is coming from tons of different users, mainly IPs, so I think page protection is warranted. Now per WP:RGTSP I should mention that some new-ish accounts have made good contributions recently, e.g. here and here, but these contributors would not be stopped if auto-confirmation were required to edit. It would be really nice not to constantly see this page at the top of my watchlist with some new problem, and to free up that energy for improving the encyclopedia. Thanks! Astrophobe (talk) 01:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Eisenman

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I have reasons to believe there is socking going on here. I have no idea who the sockmaster would be, so can't exactly compile an SPI at this time. However, we've had various and random users and IPs making the same or fairly similar edits in the last several months. Amaury • 21:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet imagery during the Russo-Ukrainian War

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBEE. Painting17 (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. New article with no history of disruptive editing. If that changes, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Nicki Minaj

Temporary protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IPs introducing deliberate factual errors in the past few days — B. L. I. R. 02:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red Square

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Bellinger

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Van cat

Semi-protection: IP and throwaway-account vandalism every few days, of an anti-Armenian and anti-Kurdish, pro-Turk nature, in violation of WP:ARBAA. This has been going on for years and is probably mostly the same person or couple of people, but it has accellerated recently. I'm not sure any IP or new-account edits to this article have ever been constructive.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action, though WP:ARBAA worthy. low intensity, prolonged duration vandalism --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Martin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be a persistent and consistent edit war going on during the current Australian federal election. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 04:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

88.245.192.5 (talk) 02:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done No mention of what article is requested. — B. L. I. R. 02:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ananya Panday

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Costa

Reason: High level of IP vandalism that is edit warring with unsourced edits, attempting to change the subject's name. —grolltech(talk) 07:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Type 052D destroyer

Reason: Starting on May 3, edits by multiple IPs using unreliable sources (self-published websites and forums.) - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 07:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Skylit Drive

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/Scottq, using IPs from Ontario. Binksternet (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion in the United States by state

Reason: Extremely high level of vandalism from a user called Jamberpilot who was previously vandalizing this page and the Abortion in Ohio page as an IP. Another user was helping me undo this vandal’s edits, but has apparently gone to sleep, and I very much need to as well. Please help. I don’t know what to do. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 07:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for one week by Black Kite. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:47, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by new user. Temporary protection for a week or two until they calm down. el.ziade (talkallam) 07:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. We do not protect articles against one user; the user who caused disruption has not edited for two days, and if they continue they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Afifi al-Akiti

Reason: Persistent vandalism on BLP. Lulusword (talk) 10:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of living centenarians

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP editors. Temporary protection recently expired. Renewal6 (talk) 10:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Smalls

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Peaceray (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of hottest stars

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is being regularly vandalised by anonymous editors. Lithopsian (talk) 15:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AnyDesk

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent whitewashing by series of sock accounts. MrOllie (talk) 13:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at [18] and [19], it's unlikely that this will continue. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rock music

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term edit warring between IPs from Munich. Wesoree (Talk Contribs) 15:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Bellino

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism. Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 17:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fano (militia)

Reason: article contains significant factual inaccuracies 24.148.9.33 (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Editing of this page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as a result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m starting to wonder that with such frequently requested pages like this, that we start linking to the archive pages to show just how highly concentrated it is CreecregofLife (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving...

Radyr Comprehensive School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism from many ips. Wesoree (Talk Contribs) 14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been two disruptive edits from IPs since the beginning of the year. That's not a "high level" by any stretch. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maxi López

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High IP vandalism. Wesoree (Talk Contribs) 15:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bleach (manga)

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits from IPs. Xexerss (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Airlines

Reason: The pages have been protected since 8 November 2015. I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again. M.FirasBukhari (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Biblioworm: pinging protecting administrator Biblioworm (though they haven’t edited for a while). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. Left a note on Biblioworm's talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's been some block evasion that gets through even the semi-protection so I'm not sure unprotection is the best idea. — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per Wug. Primefac (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UAAP Season 84 volleyball tournaments

Reason: IP vandalism. ZZSWKX (talk) 07:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please provide diffs of vandalism if you'd like the page to be protected, because I don't see any obvious vandalism at all. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion in Ohio

Reason: Extremely high level of vandalism from a user called Jamberpilot who was previously vandalizing this page and the “Abortion in the United States by state” page as an IP. Another user was helping me undo this vandal’s edits, but has apparently gone to sleep, and I very much need to as well. Please help. I don’t know what to do. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 07:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. You both now have warnings for edit warring. Please stop. You've both been told to stop calling each other's edits vandalism. Please stop. You both need to cease the personal attacks. Please stop. I am inclined to block you both, as you should not need a warning to not indulge in this behavior. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I don’t understand how I could have handled the situation any better than I did. Jamberpilot repeatedly edited the page so that it said abortion was illegal in Ohio at a point which is approximately 6 weeks LMP despite the fact that it is currently legal and available up to 22 weeks LMP in that state. That is a horrible way to misinform people, and it could have horrible consequences. Drmies undid Jamberpilot’s edits and told him to discuss it on Talk, but he just left a message on the Talk page and then immediately restored his false information on the article, and even lied in his edit claiming that it had been discussed when it hadn’t. Misinforming people has real consequences, like what we’re seeing in the real world, and Jamberpilot just repeatedly refuses to accept facts or have discussions before making these edits. People rely on this site to teach them about the world, and there’s a lot that needs to be done better. How can I let false and misleading information remain on a page just because the person who put it there is very persistent and refuses to discuss it? What if a woman in Ohio who didn’t realize she was pregnant until she was 8, 12, or 16 weeks along came to Wikipedia to learn if she could get an abortion, and cried in despair because she saw the page after Jamberpilot put that false information on it and before Drmies or I could fix it? What else could happen? —— VictimOfEntropy (signing my username here because I don’t know how else to do it. Sorry. I just hope things will be alright now).

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khalaj people

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IP user. Arguing about a content, however source is present. Beshogur (talk) 09:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ziggy Xolane Ndhlovu

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Xolane Ndhlovu. GPL93 (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colby Howard

Unprotection: Protection no longer necessary. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 01:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it no longer necessary? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The event last year that got this protected is quite serious and without a really good reason I'm not inclined to unprotect. — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: pinging the protecting administrator Primefac for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already asked and replied at my userpage, seems a case of OTHERPARENT at play. The disruption stopped because the page was semi'd, and I see zero reason to drop that. (please ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:太西

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by socks. PAVLOV (talk) 10:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If the user wants their talk page protected, they should probably request that themselves. I don't think we should usually protect user talk pages without consent from the user. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Wood

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edit war. - Daveout(talk) 16:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cinco de Mayo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I wonder why. It's not like Ymblanter protected it first and then added the message here. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected. Hopefully, the bot only confused this with the request above. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rhys Muldoon

Reason: IP vandalism on a BLP. 159.196.100.171 (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julio Jones

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collin Morikawa

Reason: We're on the 3rd newly registered user vandalism this page in the past day or two. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've created Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hyatt4333 now; perhaps someone can perform a rangeblock behind the scenes. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajputisation

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carver1889 (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Srđan Jovanović (referee)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 20:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 1

Reason: This page has unprotected on January 1st. 50.244.129.65 (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your rationale. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2022

John Lundstram

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Alabama- (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 in film

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruptive editing from IPs. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kardashian family

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent daily disruptive editing on high profile family. Kbabej (talk) 23:45, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:47, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FGM-148 Javelin

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring, primarily by one user against consensus, and removal of cited content. BilCat (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see a legitimate content dispute. I see repeated edit warring by one user, removing cited content and being reverted by several other editors. Since the user is not auto-confirmed, semi-protection may solve the problem, at least temporarily. If it doesn't, a block may become necessary. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonny Khalwale

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World War II casualties of the Soviet Union

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an Ip who is adding original research to the page and when. Looking at the protection log history it looks like the same person from many years ago. Mordencarfan (talk) 18:47, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please see the talk page history same person is still trying to pov push https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union/Archive_1.Mordencarfan (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by new user. BilCat (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dookie

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of the page has increased in recent months. Maybe a page protection or unregistered edits review set up would resolve this. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ezdiki language

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Indefinite protection seems to a good response now that activity has returned after two years (this page was nothing but a headache back in 2019).

Also Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan exist. Semsûrî (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Gupta

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article without protection has experience slow, but persistent vandalism. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian frigate Admiral Makarov

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 01:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malayalam cinema

Reason: A new account (user:MCCLOUD101) is trying to vandalise the page by repeating the same disruptive edits from a recently banned IP. The IP was banned after my request to protect this page from high level of IP vandalism. It seems the banned user has created a new sock puppet account. SnehaRaphael1996 (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Judd

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring over words following her recent suicide. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey See, Monkey Do

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent attempts by dynamic IP to create a page at this redirect. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2607:FEA8:5C9F:72D0:0:0:0:0/64 x 3 months -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Senegal

Reason: Vandalism. Enderman123456789 (talk) 04:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guinea-Bissau

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from a variety of IPs. — Chevvin 06:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vice President of the Philippines

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 120.29.79.240 (talk) 06:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Soviet Union (1927–1953)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors re-adding contested content without providing adequate explanations or opening a talk page discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 03:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I'm not seeing any effort to reach out to the IP and explain the problematic nature of their proposed edits. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwe

Indefinite semi-protection: Recent vandalism, plus it has been protected 15 times. Enderman123456789 (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Close, but the pending changes seems to be holding up for now. Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UNESCO

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Several IP's and users vandalizing the page by persistently inserting incorrect people into leadership role. TylerBurden (talk) 05:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the edit rate proves too much for pending changes feel free to re-request semi-protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5 Is the Perfect Number

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 05:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:13, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora (2018 Filipino film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 05:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing baby

Reason: recent vandalism due to upcoming NFT grift Robey (talk) 07:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imelda Marcos

Reason: Repeated removal of criminal convictions by multiple changing IPs. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Burundi

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 10:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Kenya

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 10:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rodrygo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many IP's adding vandalism. Kante4 (talk) 11:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Kenya

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Firestar464 (talk) 08:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Burundi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Firestar464 (talk) 08:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jayda Fransen

Temporary semiprotection. Persistent IPv6 vandalism with malformed code, statements about lying, etc. Possibly precipitated by local elections, still being finalised. Mathsci (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 13:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Byron Castillo

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 04:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leni Robredo

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 120.29.79.240 (talk) 05:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. 15 previous protections. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World Wide Web

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Mike Novikoff 07:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formula One

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing the last few days. TylerBurden (talk) 07:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like PC protection is working as intended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Federation of Australia

Reason: Vandalism. Enderman123456789 (talk) 08:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much there; last edit 28 April, only three reverts in April. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prizrak Brigade

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppet edit warring jumping between IP addresses. — Czello 09:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. per ACDS/EE Ad Orientem (talk) 15:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superhero film

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Latest target of Wikipedia:LTA/GRP. Note the attempt to avoid tripping the reeves edit filter. MrOllie (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Krishnaut

Reason: Lots of newly created SPAs active on the page and trying to push unsourced content there. RS6784 (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of edits the past few months. Feel free to re-report if disruption picks up. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey See, Monkey Do

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs, likely same person, overwriting redirect with nonnotable article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Karim185.3 (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:34, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eritrea

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism and way too many protections (try to count them all). Enderman123456789 (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should be sufficient for now. Indefinite protections tend to just get forgotten about; for that reason should be used very sparingly. Jayron32 16:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Duck

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 17:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangey McRangeblock by Melanie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Batman film series

Unprotection: There are 3 child categories now, I don't see why this category can't be useful by now. ★Trekker (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Over 14 years of create protection... CreecregofLife (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed I went ahead and just undeleted the category. It was deleted and protected way back in 2008, the Batman film universe is a much different place since then. Should be working fine now. --Jayron32 16:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Especially not only with Affleck/DCEU and Pattinson, but Joker, Lego Batman and every DTV animated movie DC has put out (that has him) including a different Lego Batman! It really is nuts CreecregofLife (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected - for the bot. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Emerson

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits and legal threats by 2A02:C7E:1BDE:FE00:9464:6E8C:D5CD:F235 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: There has been no vandalism of this page and there is a lack of updates about the nature of this important political figure. It says it was unprotected in January but is still protected 104.195.130.197 (talk) 23:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask who you're talking about? You never identified--CreecregofLife (talk) 23:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. I’ve left a message on the OP talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Malformed request; OP was given sufficient time to clarify and has not yet. Jayron32 16:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AP Dhillon

Reason: My name is AP Dhillon and this Wikipedia represents me. I no longer needs the protection because from now on i will be keeping it updated for all kind of updates. Apdhillxn (talk) 02:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Apdhillon: That isn't how this works at all. We don't allow a subject to "keep their article up to date" directly, and the article is about you. It does not "represent" you what-so-ever, and you cannot dictate its content short of demanding obvious falsehoods be removed via the talk page or thru the Volunteer Responce Team. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 04:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest... CreecregofLife (talk) 05:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jayron32 16:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Jones

Reason: Alex jones Wikipedia page has many false information Monso78 (talk) 12:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article talk page is not protected. If you have suggestions for improving the article, start a discussion there. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jayron32 16:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cornwall

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Oliveira

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brian O'Nora

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the past few days, this article has seen a series of contributions that have been vandalistic at worse and unhelpful at best. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 20:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shit cunt

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by the same sockmaster. Steel1943 (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nottingham Forest F.C.

Reason: Several different IPs vandalising over the last 24 hours. Seasider53 (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn Nets

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism. oknazevad (talk) 22:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 22:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07 May 2022

Ute (vehicle)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruptive edits from an IP. Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 19:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Pearce

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, just as the article is about to appear on TFA. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Digital transformation

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is still a magnet for people posting spam links. Could the protection please be re-added? Thanks. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sati (practice)

Indefinite semi protection See the history of this page, and continued probelmatic editing by IPs. 106.214.120.46 (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --auburnpilot talk 23:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edlington

Reason: Semi-protection - an IP editor is trying to force in some irrelevant story. See also this Help Desk thread. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:13, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --auburnpilot talk 23:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Pastrňák

Reason: High level of vandalism likely linked to the NHL playoffs 35.135.179.213 (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --auburnpilot talk 23:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elliott from Earth

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the last couple of weeks, people have been undoing the date for the last episode, even though it's been over a year since the last new episode aired and no official news about a renewal has been made. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Additionally, please provide sources to support your own edits. --auburnpilot talk 23:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honest (Justin Bieber song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Rishabisajakepauler, using IPs from Texas. Binksternet (talk) 23:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC): Note: When I die I may not go to heaven. I don't know if they let cowboys in. If they don't just let me go to Texas, Boy! Texas is as close as I've been. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 274

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive and ip editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 00:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never Gonna Give You Up

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Last protection was 1 year long so indef protecting page would be a good idea. Also high vandalism target for obvious reasons. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:39, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Indefinite is a long time, and outlives its usefulness. Better to take it one year at a time. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esquemas

Full protection: AfD redirect result at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esquemas being ignored. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It's only been re-expanded to an article once. That was reverted and the redirect was restored. Let's see if the problem recurs. If it does, ask again, but we don't protect on the basis of a single edit. MelanieN (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger Cruise (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption - unexplained deletions of categories by IP user, whose doing this on other articles also. (And they just added a Protected tag to this article.). BilCat (talk) 01:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: To the East! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Garuda Indonesia

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent socking by User:Jellywings19. Requesting long term protection, at least 6 months. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. Semi-protection has proven ineffective. Please upgrade. Also make sure that there is at least 6 months protection on this. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shane Tate

Reason: I would like to create my own page and fill add content about myself. 

Michaelshanetate (talk) 04:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not doneThat isn't how this works at all. You have exactly zero notability. And its not even protected. CreecregofLife (talk) 04:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super Air Jet

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent sockpuppetry by User:Jellywings19. They are quite persistent, so this will likely need to be for at least 6 months. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Batik Air

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. Again, Jellywings19, and semi-protection has proven ineffective. Upgrade to ECP needed. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citilink

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. More Jellywings19 problems, needs to be under for at least 6 months, as Jelly is very persistent. (This is feeling like trying to nail jelly to a wall) Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juanda International Airport

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. "I like Aeroplane Jelly, Aeroplane Jelly for me." Semi-protection has been ineffective against the jellywings 19 socks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mandy Takhar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – User:Dav Singh Bal and the IPs (likely same person) adding unsourced DoB [20] [21] [22] [23]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Audrey Sutherland

Reason: vandalism 66.244.92.192 (talk) 12:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like an onslaught of trolls. I have reverted to a stable version. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greeks for the Fatherland

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 11:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DC Extended Universe

Reason: Vandalism from different IPs recently Indagate (talk) 13:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wimal Weerawansa

Reason: Vandalism 66.244.92.197 (talk) 13:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sri Lankan politics. A few nasty comments there. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hafiz Saeed

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting a temporary suppression of IP editors to discourage persistent vandalism for an obviously controversial figure. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 11:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Tim McLean

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 14:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of San Francisco Giants owners and executives

Reason: Repeated assertions that the SF Giants are "owned" by the LA Dodgers or their staff, since June 2021. Medium-term semi-protection should help. Certes (talk) 15:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ifrit

Reason: Frequent vandalism by a newly registered User who feels offended by an image, due to religious feelings. It is a GA article, and, even after several attempts, it was not possible to reason with the User. Even if the User is blocked, there are high chances the article will be vandalized by a new account he creates or anonymously. VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. WP:Partial block --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please report to WP:ANI or on my talk if disruption resumes. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of longest-reigning monarchs

Reason: Two-day protection. Mobile editor keeps putting Elizabeth II ahead of Johann II, even though she hasn't passed him yet in terms of reign length. GoodDay (talk) 14:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Lugnuts

Reason: Requesting for my own talkpage to be protected for 1 month. Increase of late of some LTA, as you can see from the page log. It was protected in Feb for 2 weeks. Thanks Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was fast CreecregofLife (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just happened to see the request on my watchlist. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fear Factor: Khatron Ke Khiladi

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Consistent vandalism and unconstructive addition C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blood libel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 17:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tough. The frequency is relatively low, the relative amount of undesirable contributions is high, the term "vandalism" is somehow a stretch, pending changes protection isn't really made for such cases. Short-term semi-protection can be applied but would have little effect. It's unlikely that this type of edits will stop in the near future, yet it's clear that they go against consensus and will continue to do so unless technically prevented.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Martins (footballer)

Reason: Since at least January, an IP user in France (sometimes using named accounts) has been repeatedly writing in French that they are the spouse of this living person. The user is barely coherent in English, and the choice of doing such an edit on an obscure page, persistently, suggests major mental issues. At times, this vandalism has sat on the page for weeks, as Wikipedia's recent change monitors who undo good edits in a fraction of a second, are OK with stalkers writing in foreign languages. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:B046:76A:9B7E:2495 (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08 May 2022

Sony YAY!

Reason: Hi level of IP Vandalism give protection for some long time Drtsgh (talk) 02:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It seems that the disruptive activity is from one person with different IPv6 address each time. 0xDEADBEEF (T C) 02:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May want to extend this pageblock on the /32 to include this page. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob SquarePants (season 13)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content/episodes- primarily coming from multiple 2600:1005 ranges. Magitroopa (talk) 17:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kashmir Files

Reason: The protection is not necessary because the article is biased and needs to be neutral for both sides. You can't just undermine what happened in Kashmir in 1990. The film was taken positively by the majority Indians, you cannot erode the fact that the audience was wrong. 103.211.53.19 (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Repeatedly demonstrated potential for disruption. Favonian (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ngurah Rai International Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent sockpuppetry by User:Jellywings19. Master is quite a persistent type, so this will need to be for 6 months at least. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 14:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:48, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise City

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page continues to be vandalized with changes of the song's title. Songwaters (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thalapathy 66

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps changing the cast and crew. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Super Mario Bros.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent date changes for no reason by IPs. Wretchskull (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hold Me Closer

Temporary semi-protection: - Disruptive editing over some time.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BabbaQ, semi-protection won't help to prevent edits from an autoconfirmed user, whose edits you seem to be referring to. Please report the situation at WP:ANEW if it continues; I have now warned the user on their talk page about this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addison Rae

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This was protected in the past. Shadow4dark (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FreeRDP

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ips repeatedly undoing AFD consensus see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeRDP. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be open to semi-protection if this still doesn't help. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Tamzin

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of admin time is being wasted reverting and revision deleting offensive and purely disruptive edits made by an individual or individuals seeking to insult and debase Tamzin. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 21:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin is an administrator and quite capable of deciding how to manage her talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, with gratitude for the concern. If disruption increases to a point where it's becoming a drain on anti-vandalism resources, I don't object to another admin giving it 12-24 hours semi, but in my view an admin's talkpage should be as accessible as possible. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 21:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist cosmology

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. JimRenge (talk) 21:17, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4073:0:0:0:0:0:0/36 (talk · contribs). partially blocked from the page for one month. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 21:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Ball

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 23:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lock Upp (season 1)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bisping

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 00:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 01:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Royval

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding plenty of poorly sourced content. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 00:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 01:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of totalitarian regimes

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin James

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism after protection expired. Painting17 (talk) 04:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flower

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism over an extended period of time following it's de-protection. Dracophyllum 04:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Chandler

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Ferguson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Gaethje

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 10:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Koo Hye-sun

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IP persistently adding factual errors and/or unsourced contents to the Awards and nominations table. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 10:52, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt–Mesopotamia relations

Reason: Persistent deletions by new user, without discussion on the Talk Page. Please protect. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 04:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Halidzor

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV changes by IPs that contradict the refs used. Hardyplants (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution of Yazidis by Muslim Kurds

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Another povfork similar to Ezdiki language which was protected yesterday. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan also pertain to this one. Semsûrî (talk) 20:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Semsûrî, looking at WP:ATD-R, it may be reasonable to discuss at AfD before re-redirecting. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Quireboys

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Since the end of March 2022, this article has been batted back and forth between two contradictory assumptions: 1) Frontman Spike was fired and the band has continued without him. 2) Frontman Spike is leading a new version of the band. Cited WP:SECONDARY sources only support the first scenario. A big social media dispute is underway. BLP ECP requested for a few months. Binksternet (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please progressively warn any auto-confirmed users addind unsourced content. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil Giri

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created article. So, I request to protect it for indefinite as only administrator would create the page and for the creation of draft regarding this article I request to protect it as a temporary indefinite protection as only extended confirmed user can create the draft. Fade258 (talk) 02:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Move protrected draft --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asuka (wrestler)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I have already submitted a SPI case, but the blocked user seems to have more sock accounts. Mann Mann (talk) 03:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tovino Thomas

Reason: I think this page should protected because of many inaccurate information is being added by some IP users and some registered user. Movieman369 (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Say Mamamoo: The Best

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tow (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. partial block coi user name --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shebin Benson

Reason: Persistent Vandalism. Movieman369 (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proof (album)

Reason: Many people are trying to change the page from being an "Anthology" to a Compilation due to a petty twitter fanwar Noturbusiness98 (talk) 12:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lauris Reiniks

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Antandrus/Archive20

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/GRP harassment target, no need for non-autoconfirmed users to edit this archive. JavaHurricane 15:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Favonian (talk) 16:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free movie poster

Template protection: High-risk template – This redirect was put under indefinite full protection in 2009. Template protection should be sufficient; this redirect has about 20,000 transclusions. Also, the protecting administrator has not been active in the past few years. Steel1943 (talk) 08:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Air India

Reason: The protection is not necessary since 15 September 2017. I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again. M.FirasBukhari Talk 11:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.FirasBukhari: You are an extended-confirmed user and thus able to edit the article. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This hasn't been discussed with RickinBaltimore yet, if I see correctly.
Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ncuti Gatwa

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits. JMHamo (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems manageable; I have blocked 109.76.173.48 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for edit warring. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Khan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 16:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

G Flip

Reason: Subject is non-binary and recently entered a high-profile relationship, which has caused an increase in IP violations of MOS:GENDERID. I am requesting protection per my understanding of WP:ARBGS. Bizarre BizarreTalk modern to me 21:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09 May 2022

Languages of New Zealand

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same persistent changes to the lead by various IPs contrary to consensus decision. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 03:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unsolicited opinion: if you have to edit war with multiple IPs over the wording of a sentence, it might be worth rewording the sentence. A lot of those IPs seem to think they're fixing a mistake. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siblings Day

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to have attracted a variety of IP editors in the last month, some doing subtle diddling, others more blatant. Le Deluge (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Low edit rate, lots of test edits (especially around the holiday), some helpful IP edits, few watchers: sounds like a good candidate for pending changes. Also granted reporter PCR. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K. Annamalai

Indefinite semi-protection: The page is unwatched/barely watched and it gets commonly hijacked and replaced with the biography of Draft:Annamalai Kuppusamy, a subject that has been deleted multiple times, that has had several drafts (all of them rejected) and that simply doesn't meet WP:NPOLITICIAN. (CC) Tbhotch™ 14:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. It seems that one got through the previous semi-protection so let's see how ECP works and we can lower it in the future. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaman (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. This is getting ridiculous, I'm yet to work out quite what the draw is to this particular article lately. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Alexf. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greeks for the Fatherland

Reason: Edit warring multiple IPs & socks, likely the same blocked editor behind them. GoodDay (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Best FIFA Men's Player

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Replacing the remainder of the PC protection with semi. I'm not sure indef is needed quite yet but I think that's the next step if nothing improves when the semi ends. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania Backlash (2022)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 21:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citadel Outlets

Reason: Constant disruptive edits by IP's. Becoming more and more persistent since May 3. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing B-52 Stratofortress

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP persistently adding copyrighted content. Loafiewa (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:EE0:4A62:1840:FD86:2EE:5549:32EA/64 (talk · contribs). — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nordic model

Reason: Ongoing IP disruption. The protection used on the Human Development Index article has worked well. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manzoor Pashteen

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Personal insults by IPs. Khestwol (talk) 01:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low-frequency, but serious and not getting reverted fast enough, so let's see if splitting the difference works. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imam Hossain

Reason: Not a high-visibility page, but it has had four article hijacks in the last few weeks. Appears to be sockpuppetry - Imampresents and Imamhossainsaju have been blocked, but the hijacks have continued from multiple IP addresses. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23 Seems I conflicted with you here after protecting. I reverted the protection and p-blocked the IP range. I'm fine to leave it at that unless you have any other thoughts. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wugapodes: Whatever you think best is fine with me.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Wong Chi-keung

Reason: The article page has been protected until 27 April 2023 due to constant article hijacks of a non-notable actor. This has now spread to the article's talkpage. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thor (Marvel Comics)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:06, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of U.S. states and territories by historical population

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated periodic attacks by IP editors, adding fictional population data for future decades. Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:249:700:8600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). They're all on the same range, probably same person given that it's a /64. blocks are probably a better tool at this point. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Namajunas

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 22:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Banchero

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks to be an isolated incident that finished a few hours ago. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bro culture

Reason: Frequent vandalism mostly, but not exclusively, by IP's Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I happen to have this on my watchlist already, so I'll keep an eye on it. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earl Thomas

Reason: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Ccai2053 (talk) 04:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Koregaon

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent attempts by IP to vandalise page. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 05:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4053:2000::/36 (talk · contribs). Hardblocked from the page for two weeks. Also indeffed Chandrashekar azaad for continuing this while logged-out after a level-3 warning logged-in. If this doesn't solve it, feel free to re-request. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 05:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K.G.F: Chapter 2

Reason: Please increase the protection to extended users or more as some editors are using non reliable sources for updating the Box Office TuluveRai123 (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. @TuluveRai123 and MovieBuffIndia: Neither of you has conducted themself very well here, and the fact that you both came to admins before trying to talk to each other doesn't reflect well on either of you. Can you please discuss this on the article's talkpage like adults? I've read through your several days of reverts and neither of you has done a good job explaining their position in their edit summaries. If you both continue to edit-war, then the next step is blocking you both from the page, not protection. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lock Upp (season 1)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Reality series over, improvement already done, currently disruptive and vandalism editing going on C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Dorsey

Temporary protection: Racist vandalism 6 minutes after MusikBot removed PP tag Adakiko (talk) 09:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Banzhaf

Temporary protection: Racist vandalism again. Adakiko (talk) 09:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Talha (talk) 08:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army

Reason: Many constructive edits being made, especially from unregistered users. Raheelejaz907 (talk) 09:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jashodaben Modi

Reason: Frequent vandalism from IPs and new comers 218.250.39.241 (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try pending changes to prevent repeated violations. BusterD (talk) 10:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tripura

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 3RR broken, edit warring in an FA status article. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hexnode

Reason: Continuous edits by unregistered and new users, not providing valid sources while editing. FlashWikipedian (talk) 04:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shia Islam in the Indian subcontinent

Reason: IP vandalism Dr. Hamza Ebrahim (talk) 06:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only three instances of vandalism so far this year. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lech Wałęsa

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP has been edit warring in the last few weeks, removing references etc. Le Deluge (talk) 11:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too slow for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Westarctica

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article was recently vandelised have requested Administrator intervention but in the mean time a temporary protection would be best till the matter is resolved. Available at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. DownTownRich (talk) 10:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance of disruption. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Molossia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article was recently vandelised have requested Administrator intervention but in the mean time a temporary protection would be best till the matter is resolved. Available at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. DownTownRich (talk) 10:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance of disruption. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Fahim

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several ips removing afd notices/blanking AFD. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should last through the current AfD process. BusterD (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pallab Bhattacharyya

Reason: The page was earlier SALTED. I have received the Draft through WP:REFUND and have modified it for AfC submission. If the page remains SALTED, how it can be reviewed as Admins are busy on higher level works? - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 00:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer would simply ask an admin to perform the move. Considering this page was salted last month and there seems to be a significant history of disruption on this page, unsalting may not be the best idea. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 03:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Wait for the page to be reviewed please. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

The information stated is of biased selective nature and partial. Whereas the documentary is based on interviews with both the affected community and local muslim population. The documentary is depicting the truth with changed character names and portrayed emotions. It can be feasible to assume that the timeline and few dialogues can be considered fictional but calling the whole film "fiction and conspiracy" is apathy and intentional.

Therefore the request is to remove the terms that are not fact based and without citation to verified validated sources like that of bbc and other renowned press.

[1]

[2]

Indiangengiskhan (talk) 10:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Indiangengiskhan (talk) 10:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC) :[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35923237
  2. ^ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36525694

User talk:えのきだたもつ

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a jawiki sysop's user talk page. Because of persistent vandalism, I request semi-protection of the page with an expiration time of indefinite, just as User talk:Nnh and User talk:さかおり. Dragoniez (talk) 13:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I don't know how the admins feel, but I think that if the user wants their talk page protected, they would request protection (since I'm fairly sure they would be seeing the notifs of the vandalism). But maybe they're inactive. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – editor has never edited this Wikipedia since the account was attached in October 2016. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Younger Dryas impact hypothesis

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Despite engaging in discussions on the talk page, an IP user continues to ignore responses. Aluxosm (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Amber Heard

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Talk page could use protection from the stream of IPs and new accounts adding unconstructive insults and potty humor. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done by User:Ohnoitsjamie. (Closing on behalf) Aidan9382 (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2022)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- EN-Jungwon 03:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey (2022 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Damini

Reason: Moderate level of IP vandalism. Please allow this page to be semi-protected, there’s someone targeting this page every time it gets fixed, they come back and do it again, it’s very frustating, thanks in advance98.160.209.108 (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaat-e-Islami Kashmir

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper making poor quality edits with cryptic edit summaries. Seems intent on going on forever. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disinformation Governance Board

Reason: Was temporarily semi-protected previously, IP vandalism and disruption has returned since. Seven reverted IP edits in the past week. Continues to be a political lightning rod for disruptive edits. Bakkster Man (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua București

Reason: Edit warring between multiple users. This is a disambiguation page for God's sake! Rpo.castro (talk) 14:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Any administrator may lift this protection if consensus is reached on the article talk page. Katietalk 20:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It should have been handy when the filer pointed out the earlier sockpuppetry and the present sockpuppet-investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Goalandgoal. The Banner talk 20:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Shankar

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk) 15:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Titodutta (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Damini

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 98.160.209.108 (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two vandal edits from the same IP in the last 6 months is not what I'd call a "high level." OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

Want to apply ACH Reviewer. Pnamdar (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to something to do with Articles for Creation. If so, this is not the place to request 'ACH Reviewer'. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – You need a lot more editing experience, and it doesn't look good to apply when you're having difficulties getting a draft approved. Favonian (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10 May 2022

K.G.F: Chapter 2

Reason: The article is continuously being edited with unreliable sources. It is targeted with high level of vandalism. Soon it might lead to a edit war. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Oh, the edit war ship sailed a day or so ago. In the future, this should go to WP:AN3. Katietalk 20:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Baugh

Reason: Temporary semi-protection or pending changes. IP editor reinserting the names of three minor children in infobox on a BLP. BusterD (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Since it was redirected a short time ago, let's see if that stops your IP. If not, feel free to request again for this page or the Republic of Molossia page.Katietalk 19:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kenia Os

Reason: I request the protection of this page due to the vandalism and enormous hate that the artist has from a group of fans of other artists. To avoid offense or immaturity, please protect it. Thank you in advance. Santykpvazquez (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 19:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Itamar attack

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 17:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Ari Fuld

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 20:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Joachim

Reason: Persistent vandalism by ips. Sahaib (talk) 00:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to re-request semi-protection if the edit rate gets too high for pending changes. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 01:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amphibia (TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on the page from various users adding the finale date to the infobox, even though the final episode hasn't even aired yet. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Kut

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term sock-puppetry User:KızılBörü1071. DuncanHill (talk) 22:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Ethiopia

Reason: IP hopper repeatedly adding unsourced claims, unwilling to discuss on TP - Arjayay (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked: 2001:8f8::/32 (talk · contribs). pblocked 1 month. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Joachim

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP trying to add unsourced information to BLP, would prefer only established users allow to edit the page instead of having to revert the IPs changes all the time under current Pending Changes protection. — NZFC(talk)(cont) 02:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom

Reason: Getting quite a bit of Johnny Depp/Amber Heard-related IP vandalism at this article. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Raducanu

Reason: Ongoing registered user edit warring, despite user discussion. Would AIV but still hoping to get through to them. Kingsif (talk) 21:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It seems to have calmed down for now; feel free to re-request if edit warring resumes. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mehfile Shahe Khorasan

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 03:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Ohnoitsjamie. (Closing on behalf) Aidan9382 (talk) 04:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sajad Gharibi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Storchy (talk) 05:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Take it easy, bot. Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Wrestling

Reason: Frequent insertion of false information by block-evading IP hopper (Jdhfox). oknazevad (talk) 01:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Fogle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Being persistently vandalised by different IP's, can we just put semi-protect on for a short period so it ceases and I can clean the article up, thank you Such-change47 (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Such-change47 (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vicki Iseman

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Long stable biography of a DC lobbyist now experiencing ill activity because 24 hours ago a former John McCain aide admitted to helping cover up an affair between the senator and the lobbyist. Sources are developing; the NYT published one last night. I raised this issue at BLP/N. I'm requesting a week semi until the initial excitement passes. I have long been involved with this pagespace so can't protect it myself. BusterD (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkaru Vaari Paata

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandals changing the names of cast members and adding poor edits. SP013 (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption. Disruptive changes to sourced content and addition of unsourced content. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 05:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Party (Turkey)

Reason: The page gets vandalized by people on a regular basis therefore I ask for protection for the page I provided. 212.64.216.37 (talk) 11:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy- 11:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Don't want to mess up their GS on this page like I did on Putin. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Elordi

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sial tribe

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – RS6784 is continue Vandalism.Please protect this page. Wikidellhi (talk) 10:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, I reverted your edits as they were unconstructive and adding of unreferenced material. RS6784 (talk) 10:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rhea Ripley

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of disruptive edits, unsourced additions, and BLP violation by IP users in the last 24H; e.g.[24]. Mann Mann (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khokhar

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – RS6784 is continue vandalism. please protected this page. Wikidellhi (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is you who is reverting edits, by adding unsourced content . RS6784 (talk) 10:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Page is already semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bayon

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. F.Max Muller (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyiv National Academic Molodyy Theatre

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (talk – contribs) 13:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uyghur Americans

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks keep changing the population number to be 250,000. InvalidOStalk 15:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaiian pizza

Reason: repeated vandalism by countless users, please see edit history, thank you. Kazuha1029 (talk) 13:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evo Morales

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from unregistered user. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

KGD CHAPTER 2 GROSS COLLECTION 1175 CRORES 2409:4071:E1E:EAD3:C017:2BFF:FE4C:BA0B (talk) 11:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. It's not clear to me which protected page you are referring to nor what specific edit you want made. I suggest you request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ZOE Broadcasting Network

Reason: vandalism 120.29.78.126 (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

East Noble High School

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 17:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11 May 2022

2022 FIFA World Cup Group A

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor; it was an isolated incident that just settled down. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Jalen Folf (talk) 23:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:SkyWarrior

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism from a persistent, changing IP address. SkyWarrior 23:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Barnette (2nd nomination)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple editors trying to modify discussion after it was closed. Her supporters are very righteous and feel she is being suppressed; the page itself had to be salted. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joginder Singh Ugrahan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Common target for socks of Jagdeep singh bittu who upload copyrighted images to commons then add them here. Ravensfire (talk) 12:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regina King

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to re-request semi-protection if the edit rate gets too high for pending changes. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FC Steaua București

Reason: Vandalism by various sockpuppets of User:Goalandgoal – PeeJay 16:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1985–86 European Cup

Reason: Vandalism by various sockpuppets of User:Goalandgoal – PeeJay 16:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1988–89 European Cup

Reason: Vandalism by various sockpuppets of User:Goalandgoal – PeeJay 16:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Helmuth Duckadam

Reason: Vandalism by various sockpuppets of User:Goalandgoal – PeeJay 16:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Citarella

Reason: Repeated vandalism and reverting to vandalized page 2600:1700:450:7240:889D:A8F:6CD:EEF0 (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IPs obsessed with Kathy Barnette for some reason [25] [26] [27] [28]. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 02:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

Oklahoma Symphony Orchestras should include: Lawton Philharmonic Orchestra; Norman Philharmonic Orchestra; Oklahoma Community Orchestra; Oklahoma Chamber Symphony

Thanks! TiffanyRLaw (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It’s not clear to me which protected page you are referring to. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kit Connor

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Since the removal of the previous page semi-protection on 03 May 2022, the article has been vandalised by IP users 8 more times in 7 days, particularly about the article subject's sexuality/relationship. Please kindly consider a longer duration PC or semi-protection. Aviator006 (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The edit rate is a bit too high for pending changes to be effective, so Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing films in India

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Contested topic area. Frequent unsourced changes by IPs/new users continue immediately after the protection expired. Requires constant clean up to maintain the quality of the article. Ab207 (talk) 15:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't go indef quite yet, but Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Amritsar (1757)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esquemas

Full protection: Article being created multiple times at a redirect against decision of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esquemas. Draft exists - should remain protected until draft ready to move to main space. Request protect previously rejected, but told to request again if re-creations continued. See [29] for page history before draftify move swap. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Due to some of the recreators being extended confirmed, Fully protected indefinitely. Unprotection can be requested to create the page. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trajan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

House of Tudor

Reason: High level of vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 19:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Jankowicz

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Subject is newly visible political appointee whose page has been getting vandalised by ips and new regs for the last week. recommend tmp protection till news cycle wears off. Cononsense (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of unsolved problems in mathematics

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Amritsar (1757)

Reason: IP vandalism making the same edits as two name accounts. Full protection may be needed. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Channel One (Albania)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kharkiv (2022)

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE. Curbon7 (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False equivalence

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism --evrik (talk) 22:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ye

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Constant target of vandalism due to the association with Kanye. Curbon7 (talk) 19:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I thought about giving it a pending changes protection, but in the end I can't really justify protection when there have been less than 10 edits so far this year. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All affected by extensive IP hopping socking by User:Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. Unlikely to subside anytime soon (as seen at the SPI) asking for mid-term semis. Also covered under WP:CASTE. Gotitbro (talk) 23:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into this. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Kenya

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More disruptive editing (removal of content w/o explanation) from IPs just a day after the last protection expired. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vicky Kaushal

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption by IP and new users. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try a year before we leap to indef. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TV show (disambiguation)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Martinez

Reason: Vandalism Jackbluebury (talk) 23:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty persistent IP disruption over an extended period; little if any constructive IP input (to the already mature, stable article) to balance out the risk. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too soon for indefinite. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drive (Incubus song)

Reason: Ridiculous amounts of consistent vandalism on this page regarding a genre reliably referenced that is getting out of hand. Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: SlytheWarrior (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the Quran

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a fairly constant plod of IP vandalism on this page. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A couple of incidents in the past few weeks, but there are helpful IPs whose contributions are retained. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron James (organist)

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Repeated vandalism of a BLP article. Seloloving (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2605:8D80:640:0:0:0:0:0/44 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ks0stm. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sex

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Neverending vandalism. Constructive edits by IPs are very few proportionally and far between. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 19:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Talk pages are generally not protected, and it would need to be particularly bad or frequent. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wugapodes I strongly disagree that the disruptive activity is not frequent enough to warrant protection. The last time an IP edited constructively was March and the past weeks have only consisted of IP vandalism and us reverting their comments. Pending changes might be a better option to preserve the option of IPs contributing, as the current state of protection is not conducive to productive collaboration on article improvement between editors imho. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 08:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ixtal: Per WP:ATPROT, we almost never protect article talk pages for long periods of time. When it's done, it's usually due to severe BLP violations or very persistent sockpuppetry. Pending changes is not enabled for the talk namespace, and wouldn't make sense to enable there, since the point of PC is to keep certain changes from being visible to readers immediately, and talk pages are editor-facing, not reader-facing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 08:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zenica

Reason: Edit warring. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Puran Mal

Reason: One newly SPA is constantly adding "Jat" to it without any reference, similar habit has been repeated in the past certain banned sock accounts. The history of the page makes it clear. RS6784 (talk) 06:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tawa Reservoir

Reason: High level of IP vandalism has been noticed, including unregistered users adding dubious phone numbers to seemingly important entities. The phone numbers are un-verified and not cited. I am asking to Semi-protect this page due to it’s high significance in Indian history and research. Also, this stub can be improved with a large chuck of info that I’ll be adding over the coming few days. (Refer NCERT Class 10 Science Textbook {Lesson 16}, Tawa Dam oustees’ dispute and more on the web.) Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 07:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless (talk) 09:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yoon Suk-yeol

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism, beginning on May 10 Thomas9825 (talk) 08:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jet set

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 10:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aylesford School

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Semi-protected for 1 day. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

African immigration to Norway

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP hopping disruptive editor making absurd edits. TylerBurden (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nivedita Joshi-Saraf

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep on removing sources and and adding unsourced content. Do not follow WP:COMMONNAME (that is changes the infobox name which should match with the article title), adds unsourced birthdate and birthplace, and adds name of non-notable children in the infobox [30] [31] [32]. They did the same thing in March [33] [34] as well as before in 2021 (for example [35]). Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A. A. K. Niazi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent disruptive edits by IP users who should be discouraged by temporary semi-protection. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 07:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 09:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amelia Gentleman

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism and potential libel Zadradr (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ketanji Brown Jackson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption since May 10. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cate Blanchett

Reason: Vandalism 

Jackbluebury (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khanates of the Caucasus

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is under attack by brand new users/socks. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 13:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. One month to start, then we can proceed from there. Katietalk 14:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pangina Heals

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject posted about their infobox image on social media so lots of vandalism right now. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zenica

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Incessant edit warring by a series of IP editors for no apparent reason. Note article has been protected several times for the same issue. MrOllie (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sasebo slashing

Reason: Vandalism Jackbluebury (talk) 10:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Martinez

Reason: I already requested it but rejected, but i think the page should be protected due to Vandalism and No Sourced Edits Jackbluebury (talk) 13:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Hynes (ice hockey)

Semi-protection: Vandalism by IP editors. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Groundhog Day (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 15:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm inclined to protect for one day only, then re-protect again tomorrow, but that may be seen by some as pointy. BusterD (talk) 16:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Harlow

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unexplained removal of sourced content. Kbabej (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Elordi

Reason: Vandalism Jackbluebury (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aventus Protocol

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent promotional rewrite to G11 status. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. partial blocks --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Walter White (Breaking Bad)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very consistent vandalism. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 14:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 207.157.65.141 (talk · contribs). Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user was not the only vandal for this article in recent PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing

Reason: Vandalism Jackbluebury (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matty Lee

Reason: Even though this was already requested, i think the page should be protected due to controversial changes such as British to English, which was requested in last month. Jackbluebury (talk) 15:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dir (clan)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Alternative may be to block 2001:2003:f740::/43, though disruption is regular and page was protected for 6 months in the past. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 09:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Olympus Has Fallen

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by same IP hopper. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2.29.250.166/24 (talk · contribs). I initially blocked just the most recent IP for a week, but looking at that /24's contribs, it's just that one user going back to January, inserting a lot of subtle unconstructive content, some of which hasn't been reverted. Blocked 5 months. (The other range that had been editing the talkpage was blocked 3 months by Ad Orientem on the 3rd.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allison Stanger

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous accounts spontaneously created in the last 20 minutes with the sole purpose of vandalizing this page. If you check the history, some of the edits were actually quite funny. Painting17 (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roderick Strong

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:TyMega, using a series of sockpuppet accounts. Other articles that need the same protection: Christopher Lloyd, Danny Trejo, Danny Trejo filmography, Tom Kenny filmography, Patrick Stewart on stage and screen, Tobias Sammet, Ralf Scheepers, Paul Dooley, Armin Shimerman, Jeremy Sisto and Sam Lloyd. Binksternet (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 22:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 22:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple articles constantly suffering from sock disruption

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruption by socks. See [36] HistoryofIran (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Katietalk 21:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John McCain lobbyist controversy

Reason: Poorly sourced WP:BLP content. I cannot. I am involved. Seeking longer rather than shorter duration. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021–22 United States network television schedule

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by IP hopper, keeps on adding unsourced material. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicities in Iran

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tor missile system

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues. Just today, the "Igor from Ukraine" joke was added twice. K. Oblique 21:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12 May 2022

Pell's equation

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA User:Xayahrainie43 has made this a persistent target for the last month +, ever since the last protection expired. JBL (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Large set (combinatorics)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent attacks from LTA User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rukmini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by multiple IP addresses and an auto confirmed user from last few days.Kridha (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HarmonyOS

Reason: High level of IP vandalism with unauthorised editing outside of registered administration. BenHDev (talk) 19:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Unauthorised editing outside of registered administration" Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and any article. You do not own an article. As per the edits, there is no appearent vandalism in recent, in fact the only major contributor to this article I can see is you. If you are referring to vandalism made by somebody else on your account, Wikipedia Accounts are only allowed 1 person in use. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
COI welcomed filer. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arca (musician)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 21:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Wild

Reason: Mobile editor, vandalising article GoodDay (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tbilisi

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 22:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Central 3

Reason: IPs have been vandalizing this page (and related articles such as Dance Central 2 and Just Dance 3) for some time now despite multiple range blocks. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 22:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talaat Pasha

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive removal of sourced description of the article subject as a convicted war criminal, by IPs. (t · c) buidhe 22:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Vermont gubernatorial election

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP and new editors adding middle-school & high school student names to write-in candidates for Vermont gubernatorial election (because a 14-year-old is running). Schazjmd (talk) 23:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Mules

Reason: High level of vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jisoo

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, nearly every single edit by a new editor has been reverted for the past few months. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 23:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy- 04:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please elaborate on this edit warring? CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – While it is featured article. Semi is enough. McClenon mobile (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Anderson (British politician)

Temporary semi-protection: Recent BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paradigm Lost

Reason: Per WP:PIA An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SodaStream

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Talk page says non-ECON editors are prohibited from editing, but the article is not protected. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 22:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The ARB notice was placed on the page by an editor 8 years ago, who as far as I can tell is/was not an admin. No editing restrictions have been logged. I have removed the notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decatur High School (Georgia)

Indefinite auto confirmed protection: High amount of vandalism from school users. Googleguy007 (talk) 01:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been one vandal edit in 2022. Please don't misuse this board. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radha

Reason: high level of vandalism and insult to mata radhe 2409:4073:213:675E:414D:67B8:FFEE:34B8 (talk) 02:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Dinosaur Train episodes

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – multiple IPs, likely same person. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David James (footballer, born 1970)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason this page has recently attracted vandalism and addition of unsourced information from numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 05:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radiant Historia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page consists of nearly nothing but vandalism and reverts for the last 150 edits. Seloloving (talk) 03:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lufia: The Legend Returns

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page consists of nearly nothing but vandalism for the last 200 edits. Seloloving (talk) 03:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arelion

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of reverts of unconstructive edits from anonymous users, mostly removal of:

YOU DIDN'T MENTION THE OCCULT SYMBOLISM IN THE FREEMASON TEMPLES. TEMPLES ARE FOR WORSHIPPING DIETIES.HMMM, WONDER WHICH ONE THEY WORSHIP? GRAND ARCHITECT OF THE UNIVERSE MAYBE? LUCIFER THE LIGHT BEARER MAYBE?

. I.hate.spam.mail.here (talk | contributions) 03:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Addison

Reason: Repeated serious BLP vandalism (including allegations of murder), from one new account and now multiple IPs. PohranicniStraze (talk) 03:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Smart

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kendrick Lamar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Auto-confirmed accounts repeatedly try to change a birth year that goes against consensus and her birth announcement. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Having to revert a relatively inconsequential disruptive edit less than once a month on average does not justify walling this article off from the majority of our editors. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Silence of the Lambs (novel)

Reason: Much-repeated IP vandalism. The same IP vandal that has caused this page to have to be protected twice before has returned again less than five days after protection was removed. I don’t know how to block an IP, but that’s clearly what has to be done with IP 103.100.225.90 unless the page is permanently protected in that way that prevents any IP from editing. There were some other IPs vandalizing before, so I don’t know if they’d come back again as well if only 103.100.225.90 was blocked, but as of right now it’s just 103.100.225.90 vandalizing for the fifth time.VictimOfEntropy (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 103.100.225.90 (talk · contribs). blocked from article 1 month. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can-I-Bus

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 06:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frenkie de Jong

Temporary protection: lots of vandalism over past two days, many IPs Adakiko (talk) 07:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Tae-yong

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from two IPs with NPOV issue. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 09:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gilford (surname)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism going back over a year. The frequency has picked up heavily over the last several months with one user consistently reverting edits, adding unreferenced material, and being generally disruptive on both the article and talk page. ExRat (talk) 11:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sial tribe

Reason: Same issue like Khokhar page, a newly created SPA ( Possibly related to some old account) is only interested in "inserting word" Jat there. Request for increase in protection level of the page. Multiple IPs, are also active adding poorly referenced materials, with wrong edit summary and with very low time difference of 3 minutes and probably related to the SPA. RS6784 (talk) 12:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

I want to correct content I'm not giving any misinformation KK033329 (talk) 08:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – No article specified. Favonian (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imee Marcos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Page has been persistently edited by IPs over the past few days to remove cited content in an attempt to whitewash the article. Usage of term removed discussed in Talk:Ferdinand Marcos § RfC for the use of the term "kleptocrat" in Wikivoice on a political figure. Chlod (say hi!) 03:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False Positive (TV series)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced and unexplained edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First Lady (TV series)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced and unexplained edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guns of Icarus Online

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Nythar (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A00:20:3000::/40 (talk · contribs). Blocked 1 month from this and Muse Games. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Curse of La Llorona

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 11:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Evermoor Chronicles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 11:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:41.215.163.21

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. (-_-) zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 11:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SrCerberus, why are you edit warring to keep a two+ year old warning on an IP editor's page? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please stop edit-warring, SrCerberus. WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME applies even for IPs currently blocked as proxies. Plus it's unlikely that it's the same person behind that IP that it was 2 years ago, so the removal is reasonable even on the merits. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin How do I know for sure that it is not the same person? I understand that in most cases this is the case, but why would another person delete a warn of a discussion? I should have stopped at the second reversion, that is correct. (-_-) zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 11:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SrCerberus: Quite possible someone saw that their IP's talkpage exists, saw that there's an old warning that doesn't apply to them, and removed it. The IP's blocked, so they really can't do any damage, other than to say bad things on their talkpage, which they're not doing. Either way, even your first revert goes against policy. Editors are allowed to remove almost any message from their talkpage, including warnings. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin Thank you for the information, I will keep it in mind. (-_-) zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 11:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bolera

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. A Lot of IPs have been making unsourced changes. EdJohnston (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khokhar

Reason: Constant edit warring by newly created SPA who is only interested in inserting "Jat" there. I request for increase in protection level of the page. This is even after explaining the SPA on talk page about reliable references and poorly questionable reference.RS6784 (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

XXXTentacion discography

Reason: IPs have been quite insistent on violating WP:MUG these last couple days. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Help desk

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Personal attack LTA. Protecting the Help Desk talk page shouldn't cause as many issues as protecting the main Help Desk since it isn't used as often (if protection is decided to be needed) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ALright then. I Guess we'll just have to see if it's a persistent problem or if it's an "Every once in a while thing". ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nivedita Menon

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was protected previously for a month but is still being vandalized due to a recent controversy surrounding The Kashmir Files movie and her portrayal. Better if it is protected for a longer period. USaamo (t@lk) 14:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected – Six months under WP:ARBIPA due to nationalist editing and BLP violations. Semiprotection would not be enough. EdJohnston (talk) 18:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Itcouldbepossible

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect my talk page for atleast 6 months. If you see the edit history, then you will find out that this page is the target of many vandals and bunches of LTAs are behind me. So please do the necessary. Regards, ItcouldbepossibleTalk 14:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The LivinGrimoire

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Fade258 (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Among Us

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. There have been very few constructive edits from non-autoconfirmed users to this article. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Tierney (referee)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IP and new editors adding unsourced controversial claims on BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 19:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which takes us past the end of the season, I think. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Snake Island

Pending review - Reason: Events being reported lead to disruptive edits by some newly created accounts and other editors. Mr.User200 (talk) 13:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – You have not requested any particular level of protection. The disputed events are now the subject of reporting in several sources, so we hope the article can converge on reality soon. EdJohnston (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jarrett Stidham

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 21:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars involving Ukraine

Reason: TRAMPOLINES ARE FUN 99.209.11.218 (talk) 18:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done invalid request reason. — xaosflux Talk 19:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13 May 2022

Horse racing

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 15:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Osman I

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption in May. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dhar Mann

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism over the past few months. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Party (Turkey)

Reason: May I ask for protection for this page, please? The page gets vandalized by people on a regular basis. Pwnneed (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Foad

Reason: Vandalism JacksonJams (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 02:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Knox County, Ohio

Reason: Class assignment (based on this edit. This is being disruptive and it acts like a MEAT account, continuing to add undue weight information without gaining consensus VVikingTalkEdits 21:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 02:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xochitl Gomez

Reason: Persistent addition of disruptive unsourced content to a biography of a living person by IP editors.— TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SurrealEstate

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno, the last anonymous edits before this were in January. I don’t think one COPYVIO edit series is enough to say it’s persistent and disruptive. I think it’d need to be more numerous and concentrated CreecregofLife (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Left {{uw-copyright-new}} at User talk:2A00:23C5:3A7C:3F01:110E:DDE8:1C7C:370C, which seems to be the IP most recently used by the user in question. Hopefully they'll see it. RD1'd copyvio. There don't seem to be any other reverted edits in the last 50, so Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sparta Battalion

Full protection: Rampant edit warring for sometime. 99.165.88.9 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Zhoga

Full protection: Rampant edit warring for sometime . 99.165.88.9 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jakov Sedlar

Reason: Some months back the page was semi-protected after continuous IP disruption/removal of sourced content. After the latest protection expired, a new IP emerges removing content. Griboski (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 01:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021–22 UEFA Champions League

Reason: An IP-hopping user keeps adding flags to the top scorer information in the infobox. This is a violation of MOS:FLAG and is counter to the consensus gained at WT:FOOTY. – PeeJay 20:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Trudeau

Reason: vandals per revision history Ak-eater06 (talk) 20:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 02:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP user who vandalises the page making edits subject to oversight and who has access to a huge number of IPs. LTA abuse won't just go away, so I request a protection forever. Dr Salvus 22:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ashraful Islam Jhohan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Huge amount of canvassed new users/IPs trying to remove maintenance tags. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nayib Bukele

Reason: A constant stream of IP edits that have been reverted, as well as by newer auto-confirmed users. There has been a deluge of unsourced content surreptitiously added as if the citations support it when they absolutely do not. Cpotisch (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Revdel'd the nonsense. El_C 02:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barrier Air

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP recently off a block continuing to make the same undiscussed and misplaced edit. Andrewgprout (talk) 20:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 02:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus, Ohio

Reason: Class assignment (based on this edit. This is being disruptive and it acts like a MEAT account, continuing to add undue weight information without gaining consensus VVikingTalkEdits 21:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 02:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel May

Semi-protection: Continued removal of sourced content. —Confession0791 talk 21:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan

Temporary semi-protection: Subject has recently died; currently being inundated with tons of drive by IP edits, many who are not really contributing productively. Seloloving (talk) 10:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chevrolet Enjoy

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I am understand to no longer vandalism on Wikipedia again . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:800:63b6:85f4:1105:cef3:1283:c263 (talk) 02:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, Given the history of disruption at this redirect, there’s no chance of this being done. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birds Aren't Real

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent disruption at the article has resumed after the previous protection expired. It'd be nice to see it protected for a lengthy enough period that by the time it expires, we'll all have been assassinated by the bird drones the joke will have worn itself out. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 04:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ← still trustworthy. El_C 11:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miranda Lawson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It appears there's an LTA on this page repeatedly redirecting to nonsense; long-term off-and-on case. I cannot identify the LTA. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Love According to the Law

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple newly created accounts (not sure if related) keep introducing factual errors to the article by changing Love According to the Law to The Law Cafe despite a quick search in Korean on Naver (since drama is Korean) and on Google returning no exact match of The Law Cafe other than MyDramaList which is unreliable source. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A. A. K. Niazi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure why this page keeps getting rejected for even temporary semi-protection. There's clearly a consistency with the IP vandals' presence, and I've been almost regularly reverting. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 03:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 11:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DC Extended Universe

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and new users stemming from a rumor that a film has been cancelled. The report has not yet been corroborated by a reliable source. Prefall 07:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sus, Lachin

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The Among Us vandalism returned right after protection ended. It seems it's time to go indefinite. O.N.R. (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Martial law under Ferdinand Marcos

Reason: Presumptive president-elect Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has reportedly called for the revision of history textbooks in the past, and now may have the power to do so and more within the next six years. Along with the rise of troll farms being used to spread misinformation and suppress certain historical facts on social media, and with the red-tagging of companies such as Adarna House for their sale of educational Martial Law-related books, it is possible that trolls may be sent to target and censor this article and others related to it in the name of removing what they perceive as "Anti-Marcos" text. It is extremely important to preserve every piece of Philippine history now more than ever. 112.201.162.95 (talk) 10:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Golden

Reason: Repeated personal attacks by sock IPs (this from today), previous ones are revdelled. Requesting semi-protection for a short while. — Golden call me maybe? 13:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Golden, if the problem persists, feel free to make another request here or with me directly. Chetsford (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive 86

Could the enclose="div" attributes be removed from the <syntaxhighlighting> tags? This is to fix Category:Pages using deprecated enclose attributes issues (See the category for instructions on how to fix). I have to make the request here as its a talk page thats protected. Aidan9382 (talk) 04:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While this is still open, could the enclose=none attributes be changed to inline for User talk:JaGa/Archive 11 as well? Aidan9382 (talk) 05:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done — Please direct such requests to the editor whose talk page archive it is. He is currently active. Favonian (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

Temporary semi-protection

Reason: Edit warring (yes including me to restore the consensus version) in direct opposition to an RFC ([[37]]) despite a new RFC underway. Slatersteven (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Slatersteven, presumably you instead intended to request ECP since the page in question is already semi-protected (the bot should've commented on this already but hasn't for some reason), also note, assuming my memory of the byzantine DS procedures is correct, since the existing protection was a DS any upgrade would also have to be done under DS unless Deepfriedokra agreed otherwise. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh sorry yes. Slatersteven (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
74.73.224.126, thanks for the note – just the part about discretionary sanctions appears is incorrect: Nothing (...) prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Responding to talk page notice) ToBeFree yes that was actually the point I was trying to convey, however ineptly, in my initial post. An upgrade without consultation is OK if it is also a DS, however an upgrade that was not done under DS would be inappropriate. Granted, and given that no one actually understands all the nuances of the DS/arb stuff thats developed over the years, even if someone made an error I'm confident AGF would hold, and it would all get worked out amicably in the end. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I have misread that. I'd say the now-applied protection doesn't even really modify the existing sanction as its duration and protection level exceed the original one. Semi-protection is still present, beneath the new protection, for its original duration (and beyond). And yes, I completely agree. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hell, i thought I'd fully protected the thing. ECP works. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that was the Sparta Battalion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Schenker

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IP and non auto-confirmed editors. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

White Latin Americans

Reason: Shortly after the last page protection expired IP vandalism returned, dunno if more elaborated actions could be taken, as it's clearly just one person doing most of the vandalism, and may be playing on both sides. Pob3qu3 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Weaver

Reason: Person recently died, an increase in vandalism in the main article and talk page. Nythar (talk) 01:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

comment Came here to request exactly this; recent spate of anon IP edits removing sourced information. JimKaatFan (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guns of Icarus Online

Reason: I requested protection for this before and the vandalizing IPs were partially blocked, but more IPs are inserting the same vandalizing sentence into the lede of this article. Nythar (talk) 06:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muse Games

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Please temporarily semi-protect the article. Nythar (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14 May 2022

Uncharted 4: A Thief's End

Reason: High level of offensive IP vandalism. – Rhain ☔ 06:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3A2603%3A9001%3AD%3A3800%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%2F64&type=block ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Murder

Reason: Vandalism 49.179.42.75 (talk) 06:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkaru Vaari Paata

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits by IPs resumed immediately after the previous protection expired. Poor edits going unnoticed due to high edit rate. Ab207 (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring/socking by IPs and others (see hist). Article is covered under WP:ARBIPA and the disruptions date back to at least as far back as two years ago (see Talk). It is unlikely to subside anytime soon, a long-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 09:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Appears to be a content dispute, and neither the article talk page nor the article history make it clear that there is any socking. I see accusations, but no connection to a blocked user has been made. If there is socking, use WP:SPI instead. Otherwise, discussion is underway at the article talk page, and good-faith editors appear to be taking up either side of the dispute. Jayron32 17:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Har Gobind Khorana

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started as soon as the last PP expired, a longer one is required this time. Gotitbro (talk) 10:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As a side note, good faith disagreements are not vandalism. Being wrong does not make one a vandal. Please choose your words carefully. Jayron32 17:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marlon Dingle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous users have been vandalising the page quite a lot recently so perhaps it should be protected for a little while. Blanchey (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been two reverts in the last three months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry

Reason: Editor with a history of vandalism is adding content that we decided not to include via a talk page discussion – PeeJay 10:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Babe (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs. DonIago (talk) 15:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Layne Staley

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two bad edits today, but nothing going back weeks. Renominate or ping me if it becomes a bigger problem. Jayron32 17:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nottingham Caesars

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Socks seem to be attracted to this talk page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is also happening elsewhere, please include Talk:Hatsune Miku as well. Rctgamer3 (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I figured out that it's an LTA (based on an globally blocked user in older contribs). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hatsune Miku

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwv (talk) 18:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kizuna AI

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwv (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related to the above 2 reports. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Saki Fujita

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwv (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

African immigrants to Sweden

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Same IP hopping editor that was disrupting African immigration to Norway has now shifted targets to this one with the same absurd edits. TylerBurden (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Central High School (Aberdeen, South Dakota)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Inappropriate additions to the alumni section by various IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Papua New Guinea

Reason: Vandalism. 123.208.18.144 (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 20:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On closer look: Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon Islands

Reason: Vandalism. 123.208.18.144 (talk) 20:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 20:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On closer look: Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Starships (song)

Pending changes protection: Persistent IP/new user vandalism and disruptive edits. Throast (talk | contribs) 20:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruptive edits are rare enough to be dealt with by normal page watching. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia (disambiguation)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Most edits to this page, going back at least a few years, are either disruption or reverts of disruptive edits. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus! I have never seen a page that vandalised. 123.208.18.144 (talk) 21:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black

Reason: Vandalism. 123.208.18.144 (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia 76ers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_76ers 2020–present: Rivers–Morey era

" On October 10, 2022, the 76ers acquired James Harden and Paul Millsap to the Brooklyn Nets in exchange for Simmons, Andre Drummond, Seth Curry, and two first-round picks. "

It's not possible for this event to have happened in the future. This occurred in February 2022 2A02:C7E:32CF:9900:BD4C:9D62:5EF3:697D (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jayron32 18:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Papua New Guinea

Add {{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} 123.208.18.144 (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done though I used {{pp-sock|small=yes}} as socking was the reason given in the protection log. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon Islands

Add {{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} 123.208.18.144 (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done though I used {{pp-sock|small=yes}} as socking was the reason given in the protection log. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stripper

Reason: Vandalism (not surprising, pages like this are typically vandalised). 123.208.18.144 (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned, the pending changes protection is working as intended.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. (for the bot.) MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Ultimate Journeys: The Series

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP editors. Yowashi (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yoweri Museveni

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs repeatedly changing "Uganda" to "Rwanda" in lede and infobox. --Finngall talk 23:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaican Patois

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing/edit warring by a new user who is Righting Great Wrongs. BilCat (talk) 23:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Richard Myers

Indefinite full protection: Can somebody change the protection level to full protection per WP:DWG? LucasKannou (talk) 00:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Billinghurst. RIP Richard Myers. El_C 02:36, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it was only tprotected. I've upgraded it to full. El_C 02:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin De Bruyne

Temporary semi-protection: In the month of May there has been further disruptive editing. Long protection history for the article. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nagito Komaeda

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of IP vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 00:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taxonomy/Amorphea

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This template is or will be used in 300K pages (once the job queue catches up). This taxonomic classification was moved from Unikont (see Talk:Amorphea), and taxonomy templates have been updated to use this page instead of {{Taxonomy/Unikonta}}, which has TE protection and probably does not need it anymore. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 02:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Director of the Intelligence Bureau

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by IP user - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalist China

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 04:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honeylet Avanceña

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edits erroneously stating the subject is a "First Lady" despite citations stating she is not despite her being the unmarried partner of President Rodrigo Duterte. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Asian Games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Sanchez (journalist)

Reason: the protection is no longer necessary because it hasn't been touched for over a decade, citations are littered with dead links and it should be updated Davetheirishguy (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Davetheirishguy. The page was protected in December 2016 due to persistent violations of our BLP policy. There have been no edits by IPs since then because the page is semi-protected but there have been dozens of edits by auto-confirmed users. You are auto-confirmed so are able to update the dead links if you are so inclined. Nevertheless, pinging Drmies for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, I don't know. Hit or miss. If you unprotect and the BLP-violating vampires return, we'll protect it again, but it certainly was distasteful. Drmies (talk) 00:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies. Actually, looking at the history more closely, the BLP violation was restored in September 2017 until Davetheirishguy removed it yesterday saying the citations were dead links. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
yes, that is correct, I took them out, the Miami Herald and Sun-Sentinel articles that were cited were links to "Page Not Found" messages, not even archived or paywalled articles. Davetheirishguy (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmx15, I see that now--thanks. "restore DUI incident, see talk page" is kind of crappy, particularly without anything other than one comment from a different editor. Very disappointing. Davetheirishguy, thanks. Drmies (talk) 13:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The above discussion notwithstanding, this is a high-profile controversial journalist, and BLP problems are likely to return as soon as protection expired. Drmies said "hit or miss" on unprotecting, and I tend to lead towards leaving it semi-protected. --Jayron32 18:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CBI 5: The Brain

Reason: High level of vandalism, adding unreliable sources by IP users. Continuosly changing gross without adding reliable source. Grabup (talk) 02:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is urgently needed please anyone look into this. Grabup (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. On the heavier side since it's fresh off another semi. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 10:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jordi Amat

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Maybe a protection longer than 30 days would be needed. It's been going for months. Dr Salvus 09:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Tate

Reason: Repeated attempts to change date of birth with no reliable source. Long-running dispute with multiple IPs. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CBeebies

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 10:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quad (figure skating)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 14:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram (actor)

Reason: frequent unnecessary edits AvRam (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated nonsensical/inaccurate edits from IP users. AldezD (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hambirrao Mohite

Reason: High level of consistent IP vandalism on this page. Need page protected with confirmed users access only. MehmoodS (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Mules

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by IPs and apparent SPAs. soibangla (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fast X

Reason: Notable increase in IP "vandalism". Iamnoahflores (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MasterChef Australia (series 14)

Reason: Anonymous editor is posting spoilers on future eliminations WWGB (talk) 06:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Keed

Reason: His death is being reported by meme pages and/or unreliable sources on Twitter. It has not been confirmed by management or any family — or official news outlets. It should be locked. 157.65.238.231 (talk) 06:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Here is a reliable source which confirms his death. Grabup (talk) 08:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Looks like the issue has been resolved. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Assassins

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of disruption by non-auto-confirmed users. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class

Reason: Multiple anonymous IP users continously adding unncessary/trivial information regarding George Floyd owning a car. Maybe protect the page indefinitely? This nonsense has been going on for over the last several weeks or months. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stepan Bandera

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed. Apparently there are a lot of people who do not like what is written in the article, and we are now down to the situation when reliably sourced information is being reverted on almost a daily basis. The article is under discretionary sanctions and has been semi-protected for a long time. Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: I'd certainly consider raising the level of protection, but it won't do much towards solving the current issue. As far as I can see, all edits within the last week except this one were done by extended-confirmed users. Favonian (talk) 11:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ Favonian & Ymblanter Perhaps this would be a good candidate for ACDS/EE editing restrictions? ECP and 1RR? -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are both right, and I should have been more careful. Indeed, the previous bad edit before yesterday by an autoconfirmed user was on May 1. We probably can survive with semi-protection for the time being. Ymblanter (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – for the moment, but discretionary tools are being sharpened. Favonian (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Raducanu

Reason: Tendentious editing started after one of the recent edit warring newbies didn't like discussion. Kingsif (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pachelbel's Canon

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Mathsci edit warring their preferred version; once more... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bigg Boss (Malayalam season 4)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. -JoxinVerified User 18:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jana Gana Mana (2022 film)

Reason: Vandalism by IP users. Continuosly changing budget and grosse of the film without adding any reliable sources. Grabup (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is urgently needed, anyone please do it. Grabup (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chuhra

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP editors. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kostas Tsimikas

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just won the FA Cup, lots of vandalism and fan edits. Won't need protecting for that long. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15 May 2022

User talk:ZappaOMatic/Archive 4

As brought to my attention by @Aidan9382:, the presence of enclose="div" is causing the archive to end up in Category:Pages using deprecated enclose attributes. While the archive is protected such that only sysops can edit, I am not one so I'm unable to remove the attributes myself. Zappa⚡Matic 21:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I removed two instances of this attribute. Hopefully all is good now. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan

Add {{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}. 123.208.18.144 (talk) 22:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done though I used {{pp-blp|small=yes}} as the protection log shows the page was protected due to BLP violations. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Historical GDP of China

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by long-running sockpuppetteer User:Legende_Legende_Legende (SPI) via regular IP-hopping. Nearly all anon edits to the "Current status" section since April 2021 are LLL, and it looks like anon edits go back to at least January 2020 (with Special:Contributions/185.121.112.100); this makes up the grand majority of anon edits from the time. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 European Rally Championship

Reason: Relentless campaign by anon IP to include unreferenced activities of living people or entities. Anon declines to engage in dialogue, has multiple warnings on their user talk page and has been blocked in the past for this reason. Rally Wonk (talk) 17:37, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

North Macedonia at the Olympics

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by previously blocked User 91.148.82.106 (which is itself a sock) at this and other articles about Balkan states at the Olympics Jeff in CA (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Shireen Abu Akleh

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA, pinging Ymblanter who protected the parent. nableezy - 19:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 19:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by dynamic IP user who promises to keep changing sourced information. BilCat (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan

Reason: A great deal of vandalism since Sheikh Mohamed became president of the UAE hours ago. Векочел (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. It's at WP:ITN, so there's a lot of traffic. But nothing too crazy so far. El_C 21:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, that showed me. El_C 03:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

United Arab Emirates

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 197.37.224.88 (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. High level of disruption recently even preceding the death of Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan. El_C 21:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poppy Playtime

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism after page got unprotected. Vandalism seems to be coming from different people. Jurta talk 21:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jurta, an EDP445 (he only wanted a cupcake!) reference, how weird. El_C 21:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Keed

Temporary semi-protection: Subject has recently passed away. Réunion (talk!) 22:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Buffalo mass shooting

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent serious BLP vandalism from specific user, and still awaiting an admin to process AIV to block them, but this article will inevitably need temporary semiprotection anyway (just like every past American mass shooting) so that might as well be done. Valid preventative reason, since edits like this are seriously problematic. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given edits like this you might even wish to consider ECP. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Not enough disruption to justify an increase from the current level of protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YSL Records

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 22:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I support this request. From what I gather, an artist on the label died and the article has experienced a large volume of disruption/vandalism. I suggest a week to let things die down. S0091 (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People's Liberation Army

Semi-protection: Block evasion (89.205.135.134 using multiple IPs.). Rastinition (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by sockpuppeteer User:Legende_Legende_Legende; past similar edits to the article noted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Legende_Legende_Legende/Archive#21_March_2022. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Eurovision Song Contest winners

Temporary semi-protection: The Eurovision Song Contest 2022 just happened, and some Brits are angry. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor 42

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Bgsu98 (talk) 01:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Amogus

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Fade258 (talk) 02:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Ad Orientem (talk) 03:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Oricum

Reason: Edit warring over content dispute. There's both a talk page discussion and a DRN discussion going on but that isn't preventing the participants from prematurely going back and forth with their own preferred versions. Requesting full protection for a couple of days, with reversion to the last stable version of 14:38, 7 May 2022‎, until this can be sorted out in those discussions. Avilich (talk) 02:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gyanvapi Mosque

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Reason:: Many users are vandalizing the page with biased comments, it seems they have started doing this right after the page was unprotected. Haiiya (talk) 02:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hot Boys

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/173.91.201.210 and Special:Contributions/172.58.160.107. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Youngstown music vandal. Binksternet (talk) 03:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Symonds

Temporary semi-protection: Subject has recently died. Réunion (talk!) 04:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A recent death is not by itself enough to justify semi-protection and the article does not seem to be experiencing the kind of disruption that would. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Duggar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Images keep being changed. Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pitu Guli

Reason: Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Set of WP:SPA and WP:NATIONALIST on an article into the scope of WP:ARBMAC. Jingiby (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected three months --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanuatu

Reason: Persistent vandalism by my one of my brother's mates. 49.179.42.75 (talk) 04:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New South Wales

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 49.179.42.75 (talk) 04:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Llanfairpwllgwyngyll

Reason: Vandalism. 49.179.42.75 (talk) 05:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Indian presidential election

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in the past month (check page history). TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Piss

Reason: Vandalism (obviously a vandal target). 49.179.42.75 (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR 1

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Long term protection, give it 3 months minimum, LTA. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term protection, give it 3 months minimum, LTA. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR HD

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term protection, give it 3 months minimum, LTA. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR București

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR Cultural

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR Cluj

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR Craiova

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR Iași

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR Timișoara

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TVR Tîrgu-Mureș

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pro TV

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Cinema

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. First edits to these pages after protection expired was this LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antena 1 (Romania)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Channel (Romanian TV channel)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antena 3 (Romanian TV channel)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antena Stars

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kanal D (Romania)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I thought all the pseudo-Mako's were a nice touch. Showed panache. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2000 Mules

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, NOTFORUM violations, and personal attacks. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 06:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cillian Murphy

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First Ladies and Gentlemen of the Philippines

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing insisting there is a current First Lady despite existing sources stating the contrary. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 08:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raajneeti

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. cross-wiki abuse: w:Karna promotion sock farm, see w:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#LTA sockpuppetry, puffery of Karna of Mahabharata ; was protected in the past due to the same sock farm — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oxley College (Burradoo)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruptive editing from many new accounts and IPs. FozzieHey (talk) 10:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neha Kakkar

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Movieman369 (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nearly a week since the page was last edited. El_C 10:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Astro Vaanavil

Reason: An IP editor keeps changing the content on this page in subtle but disruptive ways. For example, they keep changing the launch date - one time they said that it launched in 2007, another time they said it was established in 2009. They also keep renaming it to 'Astro Vaanavil Tonight!' without any reason, among other changes. These changes have already been reverted by others but no one notices. Please protect the page or block the range. Thanks, எ (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Robb (activist)

Reason: Persistent vandalism over the last few days. எ (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Masjid al-Qiblatayn (Somaliland)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 12:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed

Reason: Needs semi-protected indefinitely. 2001:44B8:41C6:F700:C824:F484:3BE7:C2B6 (talk) 11:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – That would defeat the whole purpose of the page. Favonian (talk) 11:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jet set

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I highly doubt this obsessed IP will just stop after 10 days, this is a long term case FMSky (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dark web

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Months of steady off topic talk page posts. Most of the last 100 edits are reverts. –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lesley Ann Warren

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stockport County F.C.

Reason: Editors repeatedly attempting to change the league the club is in, despite the league season not being complete yet. Number 57 17:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovision Song Contest 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The annual post-Eurovision disruption continues this year with unserious and unsourced additions. I recommend some weeks of protection. Semsûrî (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scud Race

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 14:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polyphony Digital

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 14:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ([38]) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jennie (singer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism on and off since April 2022. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram (2022 film)

Reason: Lots of vandalism Lurking shadow (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 There has been vandalism occurring in the cast and music sections of this film. SP013 (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Male expendability

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandal. Page was previously protected for a week. Requesting temporary protection for one month. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian English

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ([39]) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rashism

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IPs. 106.214.120.46 (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zuhr prayer

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 16:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sakaldwipiya

Reason: Many people are changing the contents to their liking and propaganda which is not necessarily the truth. the fact is that they just want to claim superiority by making bold and false claims. I humbly request to lock this article. Shweta Chaturvedi000 (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monke

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wall of reverted edits. lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 18:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent vandalism Vandalism continued after previous protection expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conklin, New York

Reason: Requesting pending review protection for this page please. This page is attracting repeated additions of BLP violating content, relating to the suspect of the 2022 Buffalo shooting. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how that goes.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 40-Year-Old Virgin

Reason: IP refuses to adhere to WP:BRD & is edit-warring for his word preference GoodDay (talk) 20:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HBO Max

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist cosmology

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. JimRenge (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16 May 2022

Canaan Dog

Reason: Incessant nationalist POV edits, mostly by IPs. Since the last protection expired last April, there have been all of seven edits that weren't vandalism or reversion of vandalism, not including bots. Sumanuil. 23:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

D. D. Verni

Reason: Repeated vandalism/BLP violations. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 23:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This BLP is woefully undersourced. It would be harder to vandalize if material was properly anchored with sourcing. A pending changes regime should allow some time to build up sources on this page. BusterD (talk) 02:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laguna Woods church shooting

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit-warring involving possible sockpuppetry. Love of Corey (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Maté

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. --Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Samuels

Reason: Some editors are changing his year of birth from 1965 to 1969; sources say he was born in 1965. Nythar (talk) 01:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melvin Ingram

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He has reportedly agreed to a new contract but no official announcement has been made. IPs are making premature changes. Rockchalk717 22:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. BusterD (talk) 02:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tops Friendly Markets

Reason: Requesting pending review protection for this page please. Similar to Conklin, New York, this page is attracting repeated additions of BLP violating content, relating to the suspect of the 2022 Buffalo shooting, albeit to a slightly less frequent degree. Could this page also be pending revision protected for 7-10 days please? Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going a bit further, extended confirmed for a week. This should shut down sleeper accounts and the normal disrupters. BusterD (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

Change members from 0.48 million to 1.5 million. Change origin date from 2002 to 52AD.

Origin date is wrong Number of members is wrong. There are about 200,000 members outside of India, not 500,000 overall. There are well over 1.5 million members overall. It looks like a member of the Indian Orthodox Church logged in, wrote inaccurate statements, then protected the page to create falsities about this church so that they can feed their ego. Page protection was a pretty smart move, because it means no one can correct the misinformation being spewed here. Wikipedia should do better than to condone this sort of behaviour. 115.64.202.101 (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I can’t begin to guess what page you’re talking about nor have you requested an edit on the protected page's talk page as it says above. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Southeast Asian Games

Reason: there are a lot of vandalism in that page especially the medal table section as I'm writing this there are many vandalism happening there Jr2006Venz (talk) 11:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this isn't vandalism, although most of it may not have been verifiable in the moment it was added. I'd be fine with protection, but it would come with significant collateral damage that I currently won't cause myself. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. per above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dalida

Reason: Edit war started by others, and then they claim I am fault for it + warn me on my talk page. Look for more on Dalida article talk page: very unprofessional approach of 2 editors, 1st on the intro lines 2nd one of them prepares in their sandbox a complete overwrite of the article, but it is done in bad way. Just sales sales sales millions bla bla. No concrete contextual serious writing, only amateur sourced from several invalid mediocre books. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 22:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.. Requestor has been partially blocked from the article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenicia

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits. Mostly removal of "Israel" and replacement with "Palestine". Recent examples: [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45] Bolter21 (talk to me) 07:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Refactoring my protection summary: might also need to be escalated to arbitration enforcement (i.e. WP:ARBPIA4#General sanctions upon related content) if these issues persist. @Bolter21: courtesy ping. El_C 11:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Asimov

Reason: Recent edit warring by anonymous IPs making edits which contravene MOS (they keep identifying his nationality as Russian due to his Russian birth, but this has been debated before and the consensus is that he was American, having moved to US when he was three and acquired US citizenship age eight). Richard75 (talk) 10:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia (U.S. state)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cannolis (talk) 04:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir

Reason: Previous Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protection seems to have run out. See also: Page history and WP:ARBIP. INDT (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 11:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Jones (journalist)

Reason: Excessive IP vandalism. -- L10nM4st3r (talk) 11:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of people with the most children

Reason: IPs frequently add unverified claims Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 02:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Space Man

Reason: High level of IP vandalism with no edit summary and repeated deletion of edits with cited sources. Changing the nationality by same IP (no edit summary) and a user. Erzan (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Morale & the Big Steppers

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP addresses. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Sorry it's taking me so long, Moneytrees!) El_C 12:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kachhwaha

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page is being vandalized by some IP and new accounts, continuously adding unsourced, poorly sourced ref. Shanusar (talk) 11:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounding rocket

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism after several warnings. BilCat (talk) 07:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. What is up with that IP, BilCat? Pretty weird, eh? El_C 11:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PTT Global Chemical

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... Year ago. Mymeyoupdfcode (talk) 09:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. No valid reason given. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

Remove “Neo-Nazi”, Azov is just a part of Ukrainian military forces, and this part is a russian propaganda. 79.21.134.112 (talk) 08:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion

Change «is a neo-Nazi[6][7] unit » to « is a nationalist unit » Lisachloe (talk) 11:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Same reply as the one given to your IP a short while ago: Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here. Favonian (talk) 11:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaakad

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Md Adnan (talk) 09:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shamshera

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Md Adnan (talk) 09:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shehzada (2022 film)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Md Adnan (talk) 09:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Md Adnan, your requests for protection are abusive. The last edit on this article was on May 8 and the one before that on April 28. Bbb23 (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radha

Temporary semi-protection: Major vandalism done by anonymous IP user. The sourced content is being erased again and again which might result in edit warring or disruption of page later. Please kindly take note of this. Thank you. Kridha (talk) 12:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Truett (name)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The same unsourced content is repeatedly added by multiple IP users. Random86 (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Minecraft

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. I haven't seen a single constructive IP edit on this page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-racism

Semi-Protection: Frequent IP vandalism Googleguy007 (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bullwinkle J. Moose

Reason: There is a continued edit war on whether Keith Scott is still voicing Bullwinkle or not, that has been going on for months. Not to mention the unnecessary bolding of selected “current” voice actors. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 15:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bullwinkle- Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
Lion- roars
Bullwinkle-- Must've been the wrong hat. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tammin Sursok

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent addition of unsourced bio info from multiple editors or accounts. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jayeshbhai Jordaar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsolicited editing by some cricket fans. Rickyurs (talk) 08:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsolicited? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: IPs Rickyurs (talk) 02:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rickyurs, the word "unsolicited" caused some confusion here, and "IPs" isn't a helpful explanation. Are you sure you meant "unsolicited"? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unsolicited The thing is, most Wikipedia edits have not been specifically solicited by the community; few editors are invited to edit specific articles. That's fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (persistent addition of unsourced content) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susie Dent

Reason: User keeps making the unsourced additions of her being separated from her husband ("sourced" but has been tagged with needing a more reliable reference) and changing her birth date. I've been warned by them thus: "Do not change my corrections. Susie Dent's birthday is 21 September, she shares it with Liam Gallagher. Also she separated last year from her husband, irreversibly. If you don't know the facts don't change them. I personally know Susie and your reversion are incorrect"

Another editor also reverted the changes yesterday. Seasider53 (talk) 14:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elie Ferzli

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Party (Turkey)

Reason: Hi! May I ask for extended protection for this page, please? 212.64.216.37 (talk) 14:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent disruptive editing. Fragilegraces (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im not an admin but could I ask why you want it protected? Googleguy007 (talk) 14:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Googleguy007: Take a look at the edit history. Seems to be some edit-warring. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thank you Googleguy007 (talk) 14:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see an resumption of edit-warring over "far-right" label as soon as the last protection expired. I've restored it to the last stable version, though I removed a "Pan-turkist" description, as that source did not sufficient support that label. I'll recuse myself from applying further administrative action, but semi or extended protection may be warranted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already semi protected. Perhaps we should see how that works. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 17 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can see how well semi-protection works: it doesn't. The previous protection was ECP and it is still necessary; edit warring by non EC-confirmed users resumed immediately and was not deterred by semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijanis

Reason: Repeated sock IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection. — Golden call me maybe? 15:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Habibi (poet)

Reason: Repeated sock IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection. — Golden call me maybe? 15:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

East Zangezur Economic Region

Reason: Repeated sock IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection. — Golden call me maybe? 15:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of Dylan Ehler

Reason: Numerous vandalizing edits made by parties who are citing no sources and putting false information in. Two parties, "DylanEhlersMom" and "Dylansupporter", appear to have personal connections to the article subject and are putting in their personal opinions instead of sourced information. Considering that this article is about a missing minor child, and an ongoing, open police investigation, I would like to request protection for the page. PetSematary182 (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Daniels

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations. Spike in viewing as he's just come out as gay. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oculus Quest 2

Reason: High number of vandalism, users keep changing Facebook to Meta and back again and so on. Sunflowerthomas (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the European migrant crisis

Reason: IPs keep adding repetitive updates of the numbers of Ukrainian war refugees, despite being told that this article is about the 2015 European migrant crisis. ~Asarlaí 19:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mark Zuckerberg

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – None of IP changes over the past 3 months have been appropriate for talk pages. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

Reason: The page contains false information deliberately spread by Russian propaganda to discredit Ukrainians. In fact, this article promotes fake narratives and hate against brave Ukrainian defenders. It is a digrace and an insult to all Ukrainians that are suffering terribly by Russian aggression, to which Wikipedia contributes by publishing fakes. You should be ashamed and give an opportunity to edit the page. SylviaL1130 (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17 May 2022

History of music

Reason: Requesting indef semi. Aside from ces from myself and such, basically the last 50 edits are all IP vandalism and then them being reverted. Aza24 (talk) 22:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saline Valley salt tram

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 23:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is Today's Featured Article. MelanieN (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of military alliances

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article has persistent issues of inclusion of non-military alliances. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Why did it go crazy in the past few days? Might it be a class assignment or something? MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you MelanieN, we've been attempting to clean up the article. —  dainomite   00:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of 9-1-1 characters

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. page was ptoected twice before. Lado85 (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. BusterD (talk) 22:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susquehanna Valley High School

Reason: Temporary extended-confirmed protection - Edits are adding the 2022 Buffalo shooting suspect as a notable alumnus, in defiance of WP:BLPCRIME. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This wouldn't have prevented the edits that appear to be the reason for requesting.
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the article contains biased speculative information and people can’t change it. The Azov in the article is claimed to be a “nazi unit” which is a biased and subjective beliefs of Russian media. So it is not a an encyclopedic content. 93.74.138.135 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The potential for disruption at that page is obvious. Instead, please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original Six

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring against consensus by IP user. BilCat (talk) 22:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have warned the editor. We don't usually protect an article because of vandalism by a single user. MelanieN (talk) 23:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pandora and the Flying Dutchman

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 New York Yankees season

Reason: Changing mobile editor keeps vandalising the article GoodDay (talk) 01:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:CD:C581:4040:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). —Bagumba (talk) 01:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Ontario general election

Reason: There is a high level of IP vandalism that editors are constantly addressing. This vandalism focuses on one leader in particular, so it is possible that it is partisan in nature. HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 02:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Heartfox (talk) 03:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 06:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Popeye

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 08:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old Collegians Rugby Club

Reason: repeated IP user and new user vandalism, specifically the removal of unflattering media coverage PabloZ ✉ 03:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edit you reverted was made in July of 2021. If we protected every article that was vandalized in the last year, there wouldn't be any unprotected articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dik-dik

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. There is a meme that this animal's name is pronounced "xylophone", and it has been getting a slow but steady stream of attention since at least the early 2010s. It has a lengthy protection log, but the clowning resumes within the first edit or two after unprotection. Maybe PC might keep it clean for readers.Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The protection logs gives quite a good idea of exactly how persistent this problem is. It was last protected for 5 years back in 2017, which expired on 30 April. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. At this point could be semi-protected indefinitely but maybe it would die down in 10 years. Don't see any constructive edits for pending changes. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of concentration and internment camps

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Less than 2 hours after expiration of previous protection, IP re-added poorly sourced edit [diff], which before had led to that first protection period. Similar IP added again [diff] after it was reverted. No effort has been made to discuss the material in question, at Talk or anywhere else. Pinchme123 (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Prager

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalizing users. Nythar (talk) 08:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 09:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honkai Impact 3rd

Reason: Semi protection should suffice. Easily more than 5% of edits (id say more than half of all actually) are vandalism, and the hasty reverts dont get rid of most of the damage. Semi protection should control both. Edit: There is also media attention that increases the amount of traffic with vandalism. Browseitall (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Eurovision Song Contest winners

Reason: Vandalism attempts Pdhadam (talk) 10:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yuzuru Hanyu

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by user Margaret Habibie. The first edit is assumed to be done in a good faith even though the added statements and most references cited have been included in the lead and body of the article. So, I have reverted the edit, but added the new references to the relevant existing statements in the article to keep the article neat. However, the user keeps adding the paragraph even though I have explained it to her here. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 01:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes Please make WP:EDITREQUESTs on the article's talk page. Please seek dispute resolution as needed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Byju Raveendran

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism RPSkokie (talk) 05:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shriya Saran

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please look at the history, unprecedented vandalism. - AwfulReader(talk) 12:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charizard

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – By multiple IPs and accounts. Pending isn't enough in my opinion. lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 13:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verdis

Reason: Page should no longer be protected as it has been an extremely long time and it appears the abuse has stopped. However, the page should still only be created depending on the notability of the subject. The protection should be removed though. Same goes for "Free Republic of Verdis" 180.150.38.128 (talk) 08:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – It was only a year ago, and some of the abuse came from your IP range. Favonian (talk) 09:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grigor Parlichev

Reason: High level of edit-warring and disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 07:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Yeadon

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:PROMO and other WP:BLP issues. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DatBot filters

Reason: Indefinite Extended confirmed Edit Protection, Indefinite Full Move Protection. This page contains a load of configuration settings which determine whether tripping edit filters generates reports at WP:AIV and WP:UAA. Needless to say this should not be editable by anyone. This was protected, but the protection was lost in a delete and restore histmerge operation a few months ago. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yeah. Um, please protect this ASAP. @El_C @Malcolmxl5 pinging recently active admins. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Make it Full protection. Only edit filter managers should be able to make changes to this, and whilst EC users would probably mean well, a lot of damage could be done by a well meaning mistake. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, it needs to be extended confirmed protection, because one of our main edit filter maintainers, Suffusion of Yellow, is not an admin. The protection levels should be set at the levels the bot operator intended for them to be set at. Why are you clerking RFP anyway? 163.1.15.238 (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Protection restored as requested by OP. Thanks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Yuzna

Reason: SPA-turned-IP vandalism of BLP. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator 331dot. Favonian (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bath School disaster

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 95th anniversary of this mass-murder/school bombing event is tomorrow and May 18th usually brings the attention of vandals/crazies to the article (+ it is going to appear in the May 18th OTD). Please consider semi-protection - for at least a week. Thx. Shearonink (talk) 14:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Pending changes protected. Favonian (talk) 15:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most edits to this article over the last few months have been vandalism; they are not frequent, so PC seems like a good solution. If such editing becomes a bigger problem over the next few days, temporary semi-protection could be added in addition to the PC protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Niš

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Favonian. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Totalitarianism

Reason: Unregistered ip vandal and suspected sock puppets keep removing top sourced content including Oxford and Princeton university press in the last 2 months after multiple users have reverted him. The users removing content are: 108.35.72.233, 2607:fea8:1320:13d0:a501:404:d452:5804, and DaEditorz. The users who have been reverting these vandals are myself, Spf121188, HurricaneEdgar and Mako001. Foorgood (talk) 04:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make that Full protection, this is (even if not one) indistinguishable from a content dispute. Whilst I am inclined to side on Foorgood's side, I also see that the editor removing the content is actually making an argument for doing so, which isn't being suitably refuted by other users. My role here was to revert them in one instance where they didn't provide an explanation for the deletion. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The random ip users are not making arguments there are saying "its excessively sourced" and "unnecessary" while lying saying ive been sanctioned for editing the totalitarian page when they are deleting the whole edit. They literally created their random ip account just to keep removing it without valid reason. Foorgood (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On closer inspection, the appearance of a genuine content dispute has fallen away. The IP users are using misleading summaries which suggest that consensus exists for their changes, but there is nothing on the talkpage. If a Checkuser is feeling a bit bored at the moment, they may like to check out some of the users on that page, as there is clearly some EWLO and socking going on there. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And now it seems like this is indeed a content dispute. I found the supposed "consensus", and whilst it is shaky, this is now firmly what I would consider a "take it to the talkpage" situation Full Protection requested until a wider consensus can be established. I have no further comment on DaEditorz seeming EWLO. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mako user SPF fell for DaEditorz lying and then came to consensus with me: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASpf121188&type=revision&diff=1083625041&oldid=1083624770Foorgood (talk) 14:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well this is complicated isn't it. I might just leave this for now. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wow... was it difficult once you see that there are multiple random ip users reverting top sourced content for no valid reason dont we realize its vandalism? i guess we will return here once he vandalizes it two or three more times. Foorgood (talk) 15:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 14:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cobra (2022 film)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content AvRam (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Southeast Asian Games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 14:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anjul Nigam

Reason: It looks like several users are arguing about culpability for the Rust shooting on this page by making edits to the reference to his role on Rust. This seems inappropriate. Bamboolucy (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Flores

Reason: Getting vandalized repeatedly by new account RedPatch (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conservatism in the United States

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great Replacement

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Noticing persistent unsubstantiated edits from IP and new users. Requesting that this page be temporarily protected to mitigate the insertion of unsubstantiated information. - CreationFox Talk Page 17:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Have watchlisted this just in case, we need to upgrade this to ec as originally requested. BusterD (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Francois

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 19:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DJs from Mars

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from Special:Contributions/2806:268:2403:73D:88B5:444F:770F:EF33, Special:Contributions/2806:268:2403:73D:590F:A9D5:C0F5:257C and Special:Contributions/177.240.52.234. Binksternet (talk) 20:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unite the Right rally

Reason: Repeated unsourced inappropriate addition by an IP; there are restrictions in place on reversion, so cannot keep reverting Elemimele (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black Sun (symbol)

Temporary full protection Persistent edit warring by several users all around, with one user is vandalizing the article. Efforts to discuss already made at Talk:Black_Sun_(symbol)#Removal_of_Z_(military_symbol)_and_Rashism_from_"see_also"_section. 117.99.104.99 (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this IP editor has made five reverts on this page over the past few hours: [46], [47], [48], [49], [50]] (WP:3RR). :bloodofox: (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Last one was a revert of a user who is engaging in rampant vandalism.[51] 117.99.104.99 (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Asghar Khan

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent blanking from multiple IPs. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18 May 2022

Mehfile Shah-e-Khorasan

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please see Mehfile Shahe Khorasan, the same editor is trying to publish this article in new namespaces after the SALTing of the original namespace. GPL93 (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Ad Orientem (talk) 23:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gyanvapi Mosque

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Though the disruptive editor has been blocked, this is a topic that has recently become extremely politically and religiously divisive in India, with more disruption expected. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Niš

Reason: High level of edit-warring/source blanking by new accounts Maleschreiber (talk) 20:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russia under Vladimir Putin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Mellk (talk) 23:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normally I don't go straight to long term protection, but in this case, commonsense tells me this is not going to be short term issue. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monsters, Inc.

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple users incorrectly editing words here and there; article might be better off without those edits. Nythar (talk) 22:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla (2014 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps restoring non-constructive/unsourced WP:FAN content. Armegon (talk) 22:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wydad AC

Reason: Vandalism. Hamadinhoo (talk) 22:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marjorie Dannenfelser

Reason: Personal information of where individual lives is listed. User has requested this page locked and any mention of living city/state be disallowed and page protected. Bh2win (talk) 16:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, that's not really feasible, . I have left educational material for the filer and involved myself by reremoving said information. Best --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per above. A discussion concerning what degree of personal information about a potential subject of harrasment to include in an article should be held on the talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AvtoVAZ

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 24 to 48 hour full protection to force discussion rather than edi warring. McClenon mobile (talk) 21:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Odin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing every day. TylerBurden (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. BusterD (talk) 03:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kucheng massacre

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by long-time suckpuppeteer User:Legende Legende Legende; editor has been responsible for most (all?) anon edits to that article since December 2020. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling girl groups

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of unsourced additions to this article. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Buffalo shooting

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. -- lomrjyo 🇺🇦 03:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 03:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Del Duca

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – daily vandalism. —WildComet talk 03:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do Kwon

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP violations over the past few days, after Kwon's crypto project collapsed. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian mafia you are requesting an edit to

Unlocking semi protected page to add sourced contents Jkma31 (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Buckley

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:0:0:0:4FAD (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Laurinaitis

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalised 13 times in last 12 hours. Temporary increased protection required. Nick Levine (talk) 07:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vikramaditya

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long term problem with IPs adding unsourced poorly written material. Doug Weller talk 09:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Barnette

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Brought up at WP:BLPN. Constant POV pushing and removal of RS information by ip addresses. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, I gotta write the thing! Bad bot! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 11:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angana P. Chatterji

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring on a BLP. Lard Almighty (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kirar

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 11:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Research

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users changing definitions. Nythar (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K-Beauty

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Firestar464 (talk) 09:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan Arab Airlines Flight 114

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Indefinite protection requested, at least until both warring parts come to an agreement on what information to include in the article. Jetstreamer Talk 11:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 11:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Korean beauty standards

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing. The Banner talk 11:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 11:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Women's Tag Team Championship

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of unsourced edits and POV changes by IP users in the last 48H. Mann Mann (talk) 10:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Korean idol

Temporary protection: POV editing, rm of sources vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One World Radio

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yurina Hirate

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war with unsourced information. PetéWarrior (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hero Alom

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users blanking sections. Nythar (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: previous protection was for three years. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project Veritas

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is a highly controversial and unprofessional approach to it’s opening paragraph and needs to be edited in a way that doesn’t have an obvious misleading approach by other editors. . 209.151.179.201 (talk) 06:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What’s misleading about it? I think the protection is justified as it is a highly volatile page easily targeted by people who want it portrayed more positively--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not a huge fan of what they do as well but I wanted to learn more about them and when in their opening paragraph says they “propagate disinformation” it doesn’t describe anything and doesn’t seem to be proven either, so… objection leading and objection hearsay on that lol. I believe saying something “propagates disinformation” while using political bashing in an opening paragraph just seems obviously one-sided politically motivated and not informational in an non misleading way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1014:b1a8:1e8e:21aa:8ecc:827a:288b (talk) 07:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of the article is restricted to registered editors with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits. As the talk page is currently protected, you may request specific edits in the section "Current requests for edits to a protected page" below (and the OP 209.151.179.201 has). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Editing of the page is restricted to registered editors with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as the result of arbitration enforcement. As the article talk page is currently protected, specific edits may be requested below in the section "Current requests for edits to a protected page". Courtesy pinging Ymblanter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

"change is a neo-Nazi unit to is a nationalist unit" Lisachloe (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @Lisachloe: Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ateneo Lady Eagles volleyball

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I guess the new season is starting soon and IPs are adding and self-reverting the (unsourced) roster of non-notable players. History of promo and sockpuppetry in this page. A semi-protection of a month will cool down the team-promo. The Banner talk 10:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Caron

Reason: Repeat vandalism 81.109.232.225 (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gyanvapi Mosque

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because people are trying to rewrite history by false claims.and no one can edit this..issue with the article: 1. The mandir was made later around the masjid by queen holker much after aurangjebs rule.so aurangjeb cannot destroy a mandir that was not there... 2. The controversial shivling is being examined. Some say it's a fountain because there is a hole on top. Shivlings don't have that. 3. During Mughal era people converted to Hinduism because of issues they faced in Hinduism. Like: satidaha where widow were burnt alive with dead husband's, caste issue where huge penalties were given to lower castes even if their shadows touched Brahmin shadows.devdasi where hindu leaders could kidnap young girl and use as a prostitute. Right now these systems are abolished and people do not know the history fully. Current political agenda is to agitate the situation like the Nazis. So request wiki to release pages originating in India only after due verification from international historians.else it may be really bad for the society and will be a wicked thing to do.

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Please use article talk page to suggest changes, and wait for consensus to develop. --Jayron32 12:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anubis Finch

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered editor keeps restoring article against general consensus. --Another Believer (Talk) 13:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Stable IP, block is less disruptive to editing than protection. Jayron32 13:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mansa Musa

Reason: Last month, I requested protection for Mansa Musa due to persistent IP vandalism over a period of several months. This was granted, with the page being semi-protected for ten days. It's been around a week since that protection expired, and three different IPs have vandalized the page in that time—some of them repeatedly. I think a longer-term semi-protection is warranted. Ornithopsis (talk) 13:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. He's a common subject of school study in middle and high school world history classes; I suspect that summer vacation will put an end to the silliness. Jayron32 17:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio3Net

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RRI 2

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pro FM

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Antena Satelor

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio România Muzical

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio România Cultural

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio România Actualități

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss FM (Romania)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look Sport +

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prima Sport

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

B1 TV

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Național 24 Plus

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss TV (Romania)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prima TV

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Guerrilla

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23: They use proxies quite aggressively, if that's of any interest? Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mako001: Not with respect to whether the article needs to be protected, no.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Focus Features

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: @Jayron32: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, must've missed one. To be fair, it was a HUGE list of articles to protect. I have fixed it now. Please forgive me Cyberbot, if you can find the place in your cold, dead, code-heart to do so? --Jayron32 17:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Duboe

Reason: continued slander and unnecessary edits to this page. It is good as it is currently, but continues to be edited for slander and attack. As the author of this page, please lock it for editing. Msquared8706 (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Rosindell‎

Reason: Disclosure of claims under police investigation - see latest edit and Talk page - request rev-del - Arjayay (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I’ll look at the rev-del as well. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stepan Bandera

Reason: The page is written and edited by a pro-Russian author who represent Ukrainian national liberation movements as "fascist" while including multiple pro-Russian ideologies such as calling 2014 illegal annexation and war against Ukraine as "intervention" or claiming that Ukrainian national liberation movements are "nazi." This rhetoric is USED this very moment to brutalize and murder Ukrainians and destroy Ukraine. This page must be re-written by Ukrainians who remove rhetoric that justifies Russia's long standing genocidal and imperialist treatment of Ukraine. For instance, stunningly the Holodomor (forced starvation) - a Russo-Soviet Stalinist genocide resulting in death of approximately 10 million Ukrainians during Bandera's early life and career are completely omitted. Soviet brutality and oppression of Ukrainians is minimized. Please consider whether all entries about Ukraine, which have significant influx of pro-Russian propaganda, are reviewed by a legitimate group of Ukrainian scholars (I recommend Harvard Ukrainian Institute, Kyiv-Mohyla University, and the University of Toronto scholars) 98.185.254.147 (talk) 05:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This page has a troubled history and I do not see any prospect of the protection being lifted. I suggest you request specific edits to the article backed up by high quality sources on the talk page. Courtesy pinging the protecting administrator MelanieN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Use the article talk page to request changes to the article. Jayron32 13:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I concur with the above comments. The article's history suggests that indefinite semi-protection is needed. IPs and non-autoconfirmed users should use the talk page to request specific changes to the article. -- MelanieN (talk) 16:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National Resistance Front of Afghanistan

Reason: And in order for us to correct all the wrong information mentioned in my capacity as the official commissioner for managing the pages of the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan, I assure that I will correct everything that is wrong in this article that talks about our organization.

Note that we requested an amendment, but the editors did not modify anything EBUBAKIR (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of this page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as a result of arbitration enforcement. In addition, you have a self-confessed conflict of interest and should restrict yourself to making suggestions for improvements on the article talk page. Note that consensus will be required for changes. Courtesy pinging Anarchyte who protected the page (as 'Panjshir resistance' prior to the page move). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Declared conflicts-of-interest are not valid reasons to reduce protection levels. As noted above, please use the article talk page to request changes to the article. Jayron32 17:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio Chiellini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dr Salvus 15:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thalapathy 66

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism throughout today. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Uncle Waffles

Reason: Repeated recreation of the page by a permanently blocked editor; hereby requesting WP:SALTING of Draft:Uncle Waffles and Uncle Waffles. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paulo Dybala

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dr Salvus 19:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19 May 2022

Pyramid of Sahure

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Recently featured article with a bunch of recent vandalism due to it. Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 21:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Gettleman

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war. No one is using the talk page. Lurking shadow (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project Veritas

Project Veritas has a very bias approach to the opening paragraph. I suggest changing the entire first paragraph to a more informative approach and maybe add at the end one sentence saying “there is controversy regarding…..” it just seems very unprofessionally written and/or vandalized. Minimize the politics and add confirmed facts and descriptions please. 209.151.179.201 (talk) 06:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article talk page is currently protected so you can request a specific edit here. You will need to make a clear and specific description of the requested change (in a replace 'x' with 'y' manner) supported by high quality sources and demonstrate that there is consensus for the change. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. As noted above, please make a specific edit request at the article talk page in the form "Please replace X with Y because Z" replacing "X" and "Y" with the exact text you want to remove and replace respectively, and with your rationale replacing Z. Jayron32 17:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How can one minimize the politics about a group whose sole purpose is right-wing politics? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Read it as "Shut up and sing" or "Stick to sports". —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Roumie

Reason: IP vandalism Elenatina (talk) 21:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked [52]. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gillian Anderson

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 ☎ 21:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Space Mountain (Disneyland)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Recently there have been multiple IP users making very similar edits to this article. Kadermonkey the monkey (talk) 23:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna give more detail, all the edits have been talking about some jonothan coleman, with no sources or anything. Kadermonkey the monkey (talk) 23:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked this /45 range from that article. Let me know if more partial-block targets need to be added. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Fortnite

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:09, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British Army

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent. edit warring by experienced editors. Sigh. BilCat (talk) 19:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bluey (dog)

Reason: Repeated vandalism Citrusbadger (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator decline) Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one vandalism revert in 6 months. I'm not an admin but I think the actual admins would agree. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 22:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are two incidents from that user this month that I can tell and a previous edit on the 3rd of December last year, I respect your reasoning but before you make that final call I would like to request you review edit history again in case information pertinent to the decision has been missed. As protection may save us all time to fix any potential repeats of vandalism I just want to be reassured the situation has been thoroughly assessed. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. -CB Citrusbadger (talk) 23:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I trust I can raise this issue again at a later date if the issue escalates to warrant another review. Citrusbadger (talk) 00:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Guerrilla

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by block-evader resumed after protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pyrilutamide

Reason: High level of vandalism from registered users and other sources. Gabbobler (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Reprid

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by different ips. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melvin George (Mel)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Rastinition (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article will probably be deleted per the current AfD discussion in less than a week. MelanieN (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Sheikh Mohamud

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 23:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. MelanieN (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Lebanese general election

Reason: Disruptive IP editing and high level of IP vandalism in headers and the infobox. Prodrummer619 (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Daniels

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism reappears hours after previous protection ends. Egghead06 (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frog cake

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Large number of users inserting apparently incorrect information. Nythar (talk) 06:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 07:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frog cake‎

Reason: Just need temporary semi protection - it has come to the attention of a sub on Reddit, so we're getting a lot of IP vandalism through. Bilby (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 07:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Mules

Reason: Claims of falsehood have themselves been debunked. Example- Philip Bump from the Washington Post is being used as a source [3] to support that 2000 Mules is false. In contrary, Bump's biased stance and April article was incorrectly written. Bump's claim that the Georgia FBI field office already had a person arrested in the Atlanta shooting of a young girl before the Geo-tracking evidence was given to them from 2000 Mules is correct. However, that arrest did not lead to the indictment. The FBI released that suspect and a year later, 2000 Mules provides the Geo-tracking evidence and then the suspect is re-arrested and finally indicted. In addition, the Geo-tracking evidence provided a second suspect, something that Bump leaves out. This confirms the precision Geo-tracking actually provides, contrary to what Bump may have you believe. Bump's use of a half-truth to support his biased claim is then, in turn, used here on Wikipedia which is misleading. The same could be said of the other sources. This practice, if continued, will change Wikipedia from being an online encyclopedia to being just another political opinionated waste of time. 68.194.19.250 (talk) 01:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Fully debunking 2000 Mules would take too long, so here's a few sourced to read. A pro-Trump film suggests its data are so accurate, it solved a murder. That's false. Analysis | Discussing the gaps in '2000 Mules' with Dinesh D'Souza Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules Is a Hilarious Mockumentary (That one's a conservative source.) Georgia investigation dispels allegations highlighted in ‘2000 Mules’ – Muboshgu (talk) 04:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addison Rae

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after protection was over, look protection history logs. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pokimane

Reason: Perennial vandalism as this subject is well known with a younger crowd. Seeking temporary protection as vandalism has spiked in recent days. BriefEdits (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Great Replacement

Reason: High level of IP vandalism/abuse. --Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The page is being massively edited, but I see only a few cases of IP vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 04:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alok Vaid-Menon

Reason: Persistent misgendering of a non-binary BLP. Request indefinite semi. Funcrunch (talk) 18:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Vandal

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schleswig-Holstein

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking and block evasion, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RussianFanboy2010. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jabari Smith Jr.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IPs are vandalizing article (likely related to the draft.). Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hip-Hop for Sale

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mind Control (Canibus album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – turkcell vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melatonin Magik

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Turkcell vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nani (footballer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of ips and new users adding transfer speculation about this footballer, edit warring with each other about him joining several clubs. A short semi-protection would be useful. Valenciano (talk) 10:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kadir Mısıroğlu

Reason: The page has already been silverlocked, because it has been subject to unsourced conspiracy addtions from a sockpuppet army (i.e. typical LTA). The sockmaster's new tactic is using IPs on the article's talk page for claiming that the article is "unbalanced" (since it doesn't depict the conspiracy theory nonsense as "facts"), and then using an autoconfirmed account for adding the undue weight template to the article. I suppose that the problem can only be resolved by Bluelocking the article. Best regads, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Qin Yi

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war on birth-date: there is an IP who vandalize the page every single day. Alienautic (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article has conflicting sources for her birthdate: This article says February 4, while this archived one says January 31st. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holodomor genocide question

Reason: Requesting Extended confirmed protection given coordinated disruptive editing by what appear to be sock accounts (months old account with only a few edits and no history of prior engagement on topic pushing suddenly same talking points). Semi-protection would not work here given the particular accounts being used. CASalt (talk) 00:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 12:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Leclerc

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SSSB (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prithviraj (film)

Reason: Please take a look at the sorry state of this article which I recently noticed and persistent disruption by caste warriors and other disruption as well. Considering the release of the movie is near, Please add semi-protection or extended confirm-protection to this article for a while. Some of the diff for disruption:- diff, diff, diff, diff & diff. . Packer&Tracker «Talk» 11:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Moviola

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism/graffiti. 2601:188:180:B8E0:0:0:0:4FAD (talk) 11:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hojjat Adeli

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Atavoidturk (talk) 12:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Barnette

Reason: She lost the election, so there is little reason to believe the page will continue to get vandalized. Protecting the page for a year is definitely not needed any longer, and probably no protection is needed at all since she is no longer a candidate. Banana Republic (talk) 02:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy pinging El C, who installed the year-long semi-protection. But IMO that protection was fully justified and is still needed. She lost the election only yesterday, and she remains a highly visible and very controversial person. There is no reason to believe she will immediately fall off of everyone's radar the day after losing the primary. Maybe six months from now we can evaluate whether the protection is still needed.-- MelanieN (talk) 03:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. This is a standard length for a discretionary sanctions page. Election victories or losses are not a binding metric. El_C 10:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project_Veritas

In the "Purpose" field, replace "disinformation" with a term that describes the purpose of the page subject, thereby bringing the page out of violation of Wikipedia's defamation policy and demonstrating that Wikipedia administrators have not acted deliberately to maintain a statement plausibly known to be defamatory. 107.77.224.24 (talk) 04:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: They selectively edit videos to make the people filmed look like they're saying things they didn't. Is there another word for that besides "disinformation"? Sumanuil. 05:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We're not going to entertain inflammatory requests for this article, full stop. Even if Project Veritas hadn't made whitewashing their Wikipedia article a priority, this falls under the American politics discretionary sanctions regime. Anyone demanding edits in this manner would be either formally warned or (if they had been already) flat-out topic-banned or blocked. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moldova

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE. Persistent disruptive editing. Curbon7 (talk) 22:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Seems to be just the one IP (at least recently), Curbon7. El_C 10:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Milbern

Reason: High level of vandalism as this page is linked from Google Doodle today Ttwaring (talk) 14:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khas people

Temporary Semi-protection Persistent disruption, unsourced changes to content from multiple IPs. 2601:188:180:B8E0:0:0:0:4FAD (talk) 14:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection was for six months, so I feel a year is justified. Katietalk 14:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amad Diallo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dr Salvus 18:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 12:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Locke (actor)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – repeated addition of unsourced BLP info. Joeyconnick (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Bunny

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – unconstructive IP edits. Gtag10 (talk) 14:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Wikipedia

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 ☎ 11:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 12:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ardh

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect this page son that only extend confirm user can edit. Otherwise ip is coming and editing that page. Trakinwiki (talk) 13:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP edits are not vandalism, and IP editors are welcome to edit constructively. You do not own the page. Katietalk 14:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Wikipedia

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kolar Gold Fields

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Bloody Valentine (band)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Skylit Drive

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Same problem again after expiration of most recent protection. BLP violations by warring factions of the band. One guy is trying to take over the band trademark, the others have been accepted to play at festivals as the authentic band. Binksternet (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig Ahgren

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20 May 2022

Steve Kirsch

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ScienceFlyer (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kherson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 22:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yandere Simulator

Reason: The protection level is not allowing the page to display criticism of the game 198.209.134.104 (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manny Puig

Reason: Persistent unsourced edits to birthday. Hunterb212 (talk) 18:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Two-way dispute regarding unsourced BLPs, which you should not be restoring. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Tremaine

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits. Hunterb212 (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Two-way dispute regarding unsourced BLPs, which you should not be restoring. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kazimir Malevich

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs/new accounts continually making unsourced changes to nationality after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Canter

Reason: A well-sourced section on sexual harassment accusations has been repeatedly edited with unsourced statements and blanked by an editor who seems to be the article's subject (WP:NOR, WP:POV, WP:AUTO). See Talk:Marc_Canter#Restoring deleted section for details. 2601:142:0:6370:D8C5:A4DD:84A3:65E3 (talk) 22:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That article hasn't been edited since February. This is not the venue for your concerns. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Party

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 15:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12th Man (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – With the film releasing today, disruptive editing has also increased. The Doom Patrol (talk) 17:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Men (2022 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Himalayas

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit warring by established editors with no end in sight. A few days' full block should suffice to cool down hot heads. — kashmīrī TALK 23:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Someone please ping me or administrator Ks0stm when this full protection expires, so that the year-long semi-protection can be restored. MelanieN (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CEDU

Reason: the page has a lot of content removed over last few months.

15 jan 2022 page size was 89,508 bytes

19 may 2022 page size was 20,474 bytes

2022 has seen 499 edits

2021 there was only 63 edits 

1keyhole (talk) 01:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done None of those points are protection rationales. Please read WP:PROTECTION. If you have specific concerns with content (or removed content), take those to the article's talk page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Le Sserafim

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 02:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Disruptive editing occured due to member Kim Garam controversy that is currently brewing in the media. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone add upon this request asap, thanks a lot! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Kathmandu municipal election

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. People/ his fans are adding unsourced content on rapper Balendra Sah and other candidates who are in race for mayoral post. This is absolutely going to make Wikipidia a private magazine which for sure is going to be worst. So, I request protection for 1 months from now as counting may last atleast days from now. Some evidence are here.[53], [54], [55], [56] JayMithila (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Yes, I do see occasional comments and unsourced content about Balendra Shah, in particular in trying to add a third name. But I also see dozens of IP editors contributing constructively to the article. So I suggest the occasional bad edit simply be reverted, so that the article can be added to by the many good users. MelanieN (talk) 05:06, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Jensen (Minnesota politician)

Reason: Semi-protection requested; large number of edits (emanating from newer users) that have edited text in a way at odds with cited sources. Neutralitytalk 20:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is being very heavily edited, but I see little or no vandalism or other problem edits.  MelanieN (talk) 05:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Kathmandu municipal election

Reason: Continuous disruptive edits from fans of Balendra Sah. Krish edits675 (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. See above.  MelanieN (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biryani

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, viz. multiple unexplained deletions from various IPs multiple times a week for several weeks now, if not months, which then need to be reversed or otherwise rectified. TheCherryPanda (talk) 05:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Odessa clashes

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated attempts to edit the page in order to support WP:POV versions of the event. Given the current events in Ukraine and the "online war" developing behind it, I suggest increasing the page's protection Karma1998 (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: Thank you for your swift action.--Karma1998 (talk) 20:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C of Tranquility

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by the Turkcell vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 08:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kishmish

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of unsourced content — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Asia Cup

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Fade258 (talk) 10:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: well, which is it? Bangladesh or Sri Lanka? @Fade258 and Lugnuts: courtesy ping. El_C 10:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I just posted this on the talkpage. Right now, it's Sri Lanka until the Asian Cricket Council say otherwise. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks Lugnuts, I appreciate the prompt reply. El_C 10:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem - and thank you for adding the protection. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El_C Thank you for the ping. I just requested to protect this page because there is an addition of unsourced content by the IP user or someone else where Lugnuts had posted on that respective article talk page regarding this issue. Fade258 (talk) 11:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaman (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the last protection expired, vandalism has continued, usually targeting Amber Heard. --*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 11:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German Air Force

Reason: Recent recurring IP vandalism M16A3NoRecoilHax (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eric C. Conn

Reason: From what I could tell from what I could find of the original deletion of the article, it appears to me that it was originally deleted due to violation of WP:N. Conn is convicted of defrauding the United States Government in a massive conspiracy of half a billion dollars. He was the subject of a manhunt for more than six months from several federal law enforcement agencies, to include the Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When the original article was opened, he was merely a random attorney but has since crossed that threshold into being notable, in my opinion. There have been articles written about the man in major news sources, such as The Wall Street Journal, the Lexington Herald-Leader, and National Public Radio. Additionally, his fraud scheme was featured in an episode of CNBC's American Greed: Scams, Scoundrels and Scandals and a documentary series titled The Big Conn on Apple TV+ has been created outlining the scheme.

I don't want to go into the whole "whataboutism" but I could easily point out plenty of topics that exist on Wikipedia that are much less notable than Eric C. Conn. I assume that the original reason the page was deleted was that it was fashioned as a straight-up advertisement, but I feel there is enough to write a fairly sufficient Wikipedia article. I recently watched the AppleTV+ docuseries and wanted to know a little more about what happened, especially since I'm from that area and used to see his billboards all over the place "back home." When I noticed there was no article, I decided I'd go ahead and create it for anyone that might also be curious but ran into the "create-protected" block.

In fairness, I have no idea why the page was "create-protected" (a strange concept from my understanding of the mission/purpose of Wikipedia?), but I haven't been heavily involved in editing Wikipedia in a few years. Thank you for your time and careful consideration of this request. — HiB2Bornot2B talk Go Big Blue! 23:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page was originally protected in May 2007 by BorgQueen. Courtesy pinging BorgQueen for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Im obviously not her, buuuuut I would still like to give my input on this peculiar situation…A create-protect in 2007? Geez, even if the story was minor at the time, you’d think someone in FIFTEEN YEARS would’ve managed to hear about him and double checked. Or even an appropriately leveled admin could’ve gone and created the page. Not saying OP doesn’t deserve credit but geez it’s a shame it didn’t happen sooner. I CreecregofLife (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your input is not required, CreecregofLife. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did not know BorgQueen was still around. @HiB2Bornot2B: Maybe establish notability as a draft? That would strengthen the case for allowing creation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra. BorgQueen edited a couple of days ago but they do not edit frequently. It’s just a matter of courtesy to consult the protecting administrator; if we don’t get a response in a few days, I’ll go ahead and unprotect as I see no problem here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy to write up an article, and I even thought about doing so as you suggested as a draft but then I determined that I didn't really want to invest the time in the event that it doesn't get unprotected. — HiB2Bornot2B talk Go Big Blue! 23:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected It's been almost 4 days and BQ has not yet responded, the salted article contained almost none of the information that the OP references, so this is likely a significantly different situation than existed when it was salted. Feel free to create your article as you see fit, but do be careful with WP:BLP. Jayron32 12:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanuatu

Reason: Sockpuppetry and vandalism by a group in my neighbourhood. G'dayFellowMinecrafters (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Same as 49.179.42.75. You and your "mates" should stop wasting our time. Favonian (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've also revdel'd the Scott Morrison BLP vio account name and edits/edit summaries, which also featured some homophobic slurs for bad measure. El_C 10:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rashidun Caliphate

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption has been constant during the past few months, but there has also been a significant number of constructive contributions from some IPs. The page gets quite a bit of traffic from established users, so I think PC would work well here. I suggest trying it out for a few months. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 12:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 13:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Battle of Kyiv (2022)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – GRP. EthanGaming7640 12:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

North Yemen Civil War

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war going on for almost a month. Before that there was a lot of back-and-forth reverting between throwaway accounts and IPs (many of which appear to be proxys). ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani

Reason: Unsourced content and vandalism 88.245.22.171 (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is averaging less than one edit per week. Jayron32 12:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dunfermline

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated premature edits, doubtless GF, to denote subject is a city, rather than, as is currently noted, that it is to become one later in the year. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a borderline case, most of the contested changes are good faith differences in understanding about the timing of the status; plus they are coming from both autoconfirmed accounts and IPs. It's mildly annoying to have to correct this, but the potential for collateral damage seems to outweigh that. Stay vigilant, but I can't see any legitimate policy violations (rather than differences in understanding of sources) that protection would ameliorate. Jayron32 12:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kimiya Hosseini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-jumping, block-evading editor keeps adding false information that they are married to this person (the blocked editor also claims to be 16 years old, so, BLP issues aside....). Hopefully a temp protection can finally but the brakes on this. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamra456. Singularity42 (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant diffs: [57], [58], [59]. Singularity42 (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Southeast Asian Games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Huge amount of IP vandalism. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 14:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sia

Reason: Vandalism 88.245.22.171 (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 12:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Artikulo 247

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 11:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 12:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Locke (actor)

Reason: Vandalism 88.245.22.171 (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any vandalism at all. Jayron32 12:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Fox and the Hound 2

Reason: This page has been protected for over 13 years, and it is currently low traffic. In particular, a dead link is apparently a malformed attempt to repeat a reference already mentioned in the same section of the infobox. (the studio) On a related note, The Fox and the Hound (novel) is another page protected for about 11 years now, and its problems most likely should have eased by now. However, I'll make a separate request for it if I have to. 75.106.171.139 (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that it probably should be unprotected, this could've been filed jointly with an actual edit request on the talkpage CreecregofLife (talk) 19:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Bambifan is still active, so it's up to the admin to determine it if it's worthy. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected As noted, these pages were protected to deal with a long-term troll, who is still active. Please create an account if you wish to edit these articles. Jayron32 12:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Funland (Rehoboth Beach, Delaware)

Reason: Some examples of stuff that are currently outdated is the park has now opened as the page is omitting, as well as multiple rides have been removed from the park, as well as a new ride that is arriving soon. We know this because we are big fans of the park, and have done a ton of research on it. The other editor that knows a ton on Funland has tried to explain this to the other editors, as well as provide them with sources confirming what they've been saying, and trying to reach consensus, but nobody is listening to them. The other editors then also decided to try to get the page protected and block the knowledgeable from correcting the page. We have no connection to ANY of the editors including the now blocked editor, however we do know the page really shouldn't be protected when apparently nobody besides the blocked editor knows anything bout the park. We've triple read through the article's talk page, and it appears the only person that knows about the park is the now blocked editor. This is totally unfair to them as they've evidently done nothing but try to make sure the page was accurate. This is really quite disgusting to say the least. Although we don't have any connection or conflict of interest with Funland, we feel like it's our duty to make sure that the page has the information it deserves to have, that way people can learn proper information bout the park. We hope you do the right thing and unblock the page and hopefully even the editor as well. 

AlmNack (talk) 01:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Who are 'we'? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jayron32 12:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

change "is a neo-Nazi unit" to "is a nationalist unit" Lisachloe (talk) 11:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Same reply as for your three previous requests: Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page.. Favonian (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Australian federal election

Temporary semi-protection: The federal election is coming tomorrow, and there has been IP/unregistered vandalism that has slowly been increasing in frequency in the past few days. By tomorrow, the the vandalism is likely to multiply exponentially if left unprotected since the daily pageviews is basically guaranteed to also significantly increase. I'd suggest to protect the page for at least the next 3 days since the results are unlikely to be finalised by tomorrow. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 10:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I can see more positive (or at least good-faith) edits from IPs than obvious vandalism among the most recent several days. Jayron32 12:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response, if the situation does change tomorrow then I'll come back here, but for now I'll just watch the page and remove obvious vandalism since it is still manageable right now. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 12:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Lorenz

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Endwise (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Barkin

Reason: A lot of nonconstructive edits have started pouring in ever since she gave her taped deposition during the Depp v. Heard trial yesterday (May 19). Some of them are flat-out, indisputable vandalism. Many (albeit not all) appear to be from IP accounts. Afddiary (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 11:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing widespread bad-faith editing. Maybe some misunderstandings about how to add images or sourcing requirements, but nothing that I would call outright vandalism. Jayron32 12:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jayron32, It wasn't a misunderstandings or something like that, anonymous users are continously adding original research. One user changed it to a deep depression and another user changed it to a tropical storm. I don't know whether you guys will take that as a reason or not Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 12:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adding the comment of Beraniladri19. The IP is clearly vandalism the page because it was added incorrent information on the storm see revision. (1), (2) HurricaneEdgar 13:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vangelis

Reason: Vandalism after his death 88.245.22.171 (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. The page is very active atm due to the recent death, but I'm seeing few disruptive edits when compared to this high activity. But feel free to list a few diffs of greatest concern, maybe I missed something. El_C 13:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

R. C. Sproul

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are several different editors (or more likely, one editor with multiple sockpuppets) removing the photo on this page for no reason. StAnselm (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. though I considered full protection as well. Reading edit summaries makes it clear this is not vandalism; there are some good-faith reasons for removing the picture. The are literally not vandalizing the article, as they believe they are helping. Hopefully, this will encourage use of the talk page rather than repeated reversions. Jayron32 16:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cobra (2022 film)

Reason: to prevent vandalism AvRam (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't see any vandalism. What I do see is a good-faith disagreement over the inclusion of some text. Please use the talk page to discuss. Jayron32 14:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Williams (basketball)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zaseok, Bosansko Grahovo

Temporary semi-protection: repeat attempts to add a non-existing template to the top of the page Frietjes (talk) 16:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HBO Kids

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magitroopa (talk) 18:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bufalino crime family

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamato people

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by what appears to be a single person using multiple IPs. Last reported on April 2nd by Wretchskull at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2021/04. All edits to this page in May are either (1) IP vandalism or (2) registered users fixing the IP vandalism. — Greentryst TC 19:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Dupré

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the recent edits are IP edits that are reverted. Le Deluge (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Four IP edits in six months. Katietalk 19:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the plot keeps getting blanked and I think this would be the pages third time getting protected. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 18:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Partial blocked the /64 IP – let's see if that does the trick, as I see there are constructive IP edits since the last protection expired. Katietalk 19:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sussmann

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sussmann is on trial in an extremely contentious case, we can expect lots of vandalism. soibangla (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting this request. Right now, it's just multiple violations of the BLP policy. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21 May 2022

American Lamprecht Transport

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated redirect overwriting by COI farm. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gagan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gaganbhullarsingh.

Single blocked editor trying to vandalize to self-promote.

  • May 16th: first series of edits by the editor: [60]
  • May 16th: vandalizing the article's talk page with their own name: [61]
  • May 16th: second series of edits by this editor: [62]
  • May 16th: third round of edits by this editor [63]

Gourgen Yanikian

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 21:55, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Please read the instructions for this page. The only recent disruption on that page is from a single IP address that you hadn't even warned yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MGM

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 23:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1947–1948

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive306#Proposal:_Extended-confirmed_protection_for_India-Pakistan_conflict. BenCKP (talk) 20:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 05:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chit San Maung

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism within the last 3 days by IP users. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David James (footballer, born 1970)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of repeated vandalism and unsourced information following end of recent page protection. Egghead06 (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Asian Games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent adding of poorly unsourced material over last few weeks. Fade258 (talk) 06:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Minister of Australia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unhelpful edits and vandalism by IPs. Nythar (talk) 08:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Glam-girlz

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The sockpuppeteer has taken to vandalising this page and (more recently) it's associated talkpage. Please indefinitely semi both, there really isn't any need for non-autoconfirmed users to edit these pages. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Arts Pictures

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Proxying LTA Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bashi Channel

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by specific anonymous IP in the past three days making identical edits, which were misinformation and giving no relevant reason for the change. [65] [66] [67] LVTW2 (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of rail accidents (2020–present)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of entries of no encyclopedic significance (for example, routine level crossing incidents with nothing but transient local news coverage). This is getting burdensome, and the main culprit seems to have an IP which changes ever so often. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: RC, did you warn a prior incarnation of this IP? Because this one only has a welcome msg on their talk page. Also, does 71.163.7.41: CIR; routine LC incident ≈ El_C Incident? Probably "local coverage," but it took me a minute. El_C 13:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Yep, warned, explained on talk page, was even blocked for it, and yet they've kept going. This is just becoming a timesink (even when the accident is not routine, one usually needs to rewrite it from scratch because the English is just atrocious) and, well, given the IP is not really static, long-term problems require long-term solutions. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paresh Baruah

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by IP user - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 07:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 10:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chiyoda, Tokyo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – vandal after last protect. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 09:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Delhi

Reason: Today a load of wp:spa's have fetched up making the same POV pushing edits (so likely socking). Slatersteven (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eve Borg Bonello

Reason: Vandalism. Vandalised this week, reverted Zikkaden (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lock Upp (season 1)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing, adding unsourced content and vandalism. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much activity for pending changes to be effective. BusterD (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swimming at the 2021 Southeast Asian Games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion of Ineedtostopforgetting, operating under no less than 4 IPs trying to edit war and retain a group of disqualified Singaporean swimmers in the field. 1 2, 3, 4. Seloloving (talk) 11:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for the excellent request. BusterD (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Holmes à Court

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recommending temporary PP for 24 hours. Recent election in Australia just concluded, the subject of this article was a high profile campaign contributor to a candidate who unseated several government MP's. There has been a fair bit of vandalism this evening, and I feel this RPP is required to prevent further vandalism from IP's and new accounts. Such-change47 (talk) 12:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22 May 2022

Fait Accompli (album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by the Turkcell vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 11:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Balen Shah

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I just created a redirect over the ECP; it will need to be edit-protected to maintain the protection or the disruptive editing might resume. Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draža Mihailović

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 16:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chetnik war crimes in World War II

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: regular admin action- --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Linehan

Reason: Previous protection expired two days ago, since the expiry there has been an increase in disruptive edits by IP and non-autoconfirmed editors. Requesting restoration of previous protection level, ideally with an indefinite expiration date. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded: I tried to request this via Twinkle but it aborted as this request was present. The six-month protection just expired and there's been a wave of vandalism by non-autoconfirmed accounts and IPs. We've seen both pro- and anti-Linehan vandalism, the latter of which is a particular concern per BLP. — Bilorv (talk) 20:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Though I feel as though we'll be back here again in another twelve months, as this pattern of; protection expires -> vandalism -> protection has been consistent since for the last two/three years. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LittleBe

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous users are persistently disrupting this page. They were very clearly told that what they were adding was contrary to MOS and they have still continued to add it. In my eyes, it’s now a case of pure vandalism and not a good faith misinterpretation. Blanchey (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: thank you so much Blanchey (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blondie (band)

Reason: Non-consensus changes and edit warring! Joey Camelaroche (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kanawut Traipipattanapong

Reason: Malicious movement by deleting important reliable information Nattarintns (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requestor is currently engaged in blind reverting to overtly promotional language.Slywriter (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nasser Al-Khelaifi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 21:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Gama

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, with the article subject being commemorated in today's Google Doodle. Thanks, AnupamTalk 04:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Kelly

Reason: Kelly has lost his seat and is now a former politician. As such, he is unlikely to attract sustained vandalism that requires semi protection for five more months. 159.196.100.171 (talk) 12:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: A politician who lost an election is not necessarily a "former politician". Have you asked the protecting admin, ToBeFree, for their opinion? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping! I think I wasn't asked, but I'd be fine with unprotection. I won't perform it myself, though. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Ping me if this proves to be a mistake and I'll reprotect. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Mules

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the description is false and needs correcting. The sources you cite to deem the premise of the film as "false" are not accurate (if you actually read them, you'll see they are only opinion pieces and the Bump interview actually supports the honesty of the film). You are falsely peddling misinformation by editorializing subject matter here. You're not allowed to that and then protect the page. Your opinion on this is irrelevant and you clearly haven't watched the film, so don't editorialize. Apparently you don't care about fair elections in the US? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KXL13 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Kudpung/Editnotice

Reason: I protected this page myself. I am no longer an admin and I would like the protection level decreased to Semi-Protection. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: Heavy bias against conservatives is ridiculous. Why allow 'false' charge with unreliable heavy biased source? Rino5611 (talk) 00:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 09:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:RHaworth/2014 Dec 18

There are obsolete font tags that are creating linter errors, and I couldn't fix them without this edit request.

Signatures affected:

  • [[User:Silvrous|<font color=" #007fff" >Silvrous</font>]] ''[[User talk:Silvrous|<font color="#8c1717"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]]
  • <span style="text-shadow:#ED8CDD 2px -2px 9px;">— [[User:Kikichugirl|<font face="Georgia" color="#000000">kikichugirl</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kikichugirl|<font color="#8A37F0">inquire</font>]]</sup></span>
  • <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b>

Proposed signatures: (these are respective, meaning the proposed signatures have the same order as the affected signatures)

  • [[User:Silvrous|<span style="color:#007fff;">Silvrous</span>]] ''[[User talk:Silvrous|<span style="color:#8c1717;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]]
  • <span style="text-shadow:#ED8CDD 2px -2px 9px;">— [[User:Kikichugirl|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#000000;">kikichugirl</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kikichugirl|<span style="color:#8A37F0;">inquire</span>]]</sup></span>
  • <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color:#D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> Sheep (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Favonian (talk) 09:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Sneap

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Turkcell Vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 04:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David M. Sabatini

Reason: Lots of IPs or SPAs recently want to add coverage of ongoing lawsuit, particularly that in the substack of Bari Weiss. I am fairly certain that this substack is not a sufficiently reliable source for backing contentious claims in a BLP; I will further mention that the substack names an individual that mainstream press accounts have not named as a victim of possible sexual harrassment. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck E. Cheese (character)

Reason: Consistent vandalism from single-purpose accounts over the past several months. Lizard (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of programmes broadcast by MBC 4

Reason: Persistent IP block evasion. Magitroopa (talk) 02:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ertuğrul

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption in May. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Suárez

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kpddg (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Facebook

Temporary semi-protection: IP editing so far this month is almost 100% disruption ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption has to very severe before we protect talk pages. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mind Control (Canibus album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism right after expiry of protection - See also User:0xDeadbeef/TurkcellVandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 13:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lars Ulrich

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See also User:0xDeadbeef/TurkcellVandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 13:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once Upon a Forest

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FilmandTVFan28: For those of us not familiar with the sock or the topic, is there a way we can see that the IP's edits are bad? I don't see anything on talk and superficially (given I know nothing about the topic), the recent IP edits look defensible. Johnuniq (talk) 10:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The IP user's edit summaries haven't proved that it asked nicely to stop, not even once. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 12:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rosmah Mansor

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism of BLP. Pakbelang (talk) 12:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinandan Varthaman

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism [68] [69] [70]like these. BenCKP (talk) 13:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gwalior Fort

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, and unsolicited removal of contents. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does unsolicited mean? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abertillery Learning Community

Reason: High level of vandalism due to recent events reported by the media Fale29 (talk) 21:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angkasa Pura

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Needs to be for at least 6 months, this sockpuppeteer is very persistent. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

European Russia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 11:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mozes Kilangin Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Needs to be for at least 6 months, as this sockpuppeteer is very persistent. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lion Air Group

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Needs to be for at least 6 months, as this sockpuppeteer is very persistent. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frans Kaisiepo International Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Needs to be for at least 6 months, as this sockpuppeteer is very persistent. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Domine Eduard Osok Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Needs to be for at least 6 months, as this sockpuppeteer is very persistent. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Sepinggan Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Needs to be for at least 6 months, as this sockpuppeteer is very persistent. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – All edits since 10 March 2021‎ have been unsourced additions, changes of dates, etc. The page appears to attract more traffic during the last few days for some external reason. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 12:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mako001/CSD log

Indefinite semi-protection: Had an LTA find this page. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore

Reason: Frequent and persistent vandalism of the page, in particular repeated re-insertion of non-critical commentary by unregistered IP accounts into the "critical reception" section regarding Johnny Depp that uses known non-reputable sites as sourcing which are dated months before the release of the film in question. Apache287 (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Jankowicz

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Immediate resumption of BLP violations by non-confirmed users immediately after protection expired. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23 May 2022

Oxford, Mississippi

Reason: Persistent vandalism from 3 or more IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 19:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Fairly OddParents characters

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Israel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring compounded with block evasion. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaakad

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent changes by IPs/new users without sources. Diffs: [71], [72], [73], [74], [75] etc. Ab207 (talk) 06:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Killnet

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kavanagh (referee)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Somewhat pre-emptive, although there has already been one vandal, as the controversy from the february 26 game resurfaces due to the close of the 2021-22 EPL season and the perceived effect on the final results. TartarTorte 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Underneath (Code Orange album)

Semi-protection: Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/Sockpuppetry. The IP user 181.48.199.41 is the most recent offender. I can tell that the same person is hopping between IP addresses to perform the same disruptive edits despite all the warnings and blocks. The warnings and blocks aren't stopping this person, significant page protections for all the articles this IP edits are needed. Bowling is life (talk) 21:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unloved (album)

Semi-protection: Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/Sockpuppetry. The IP user 181.48.199.41 is the most recent offender. I can tell that the same person is hopping between IP addresses to perform the same disruptive edits despite all the warnings and blocks. The warnings and blocks aren't stopping this person, significant page protections for all the articles this IP edits are needed. Bowling is life (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked a few more Columbian ranges. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Telugu films of 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs/new users to the financials of these Indian films which is a contentious topic area. Ab207 (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm adding semi-protection but I don't expect it to do much good, because most of the people adding - AND removing - unsourced content are auto-confirmed users who would not be affected by semi-protection. Extended Confirmed protection could be imposed, but it might not be a good idea; it could cause collateral damage by preventing editing by both the "good guys" and the "bad guys". MelanieN (talk) 03:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad of Ghor

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been plagued by occasional disruption by IPs for years now. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. "Occasional" is correct, so that Pending Change protection seems like the indicated solution here. MelanieN (talk) 03:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Paramount Pictures films (2020–2029)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. The IP user 75.181.6.248 keeps vandalizing the List of films from every distributor movie companies NSAandGCHQ (talk) 21:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Milan Lucic

Reason: High level of vandalism due to controversial incident in recent hockey game. Temporary protection would be very helpful Keithshep (talk) 03:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Milan Lucic

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 03:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Note article is under discretionary sanctions. Let's lock this up for a day or two....let's try to get those involved in the ongoing talks to just talk.....and to reduce fly by reverts by those not involved at all in talks. Moxy- 02:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I’m not seeing it. I see one instance per day in the past three days where somebody makes an edit and someone else reverts it. The parties involved in each case are different, and the subject matter is different. This is not edit warring. Let’s not disturb the existing indefinite Extended Confirmed protection.  MelanieN (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 monkeypox outbreak

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – High volume of IP edits. I think they're too frequent to be thoroughly checked resulting in false statistics making it through. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 17:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. User(s) blocked: 2.100.20.148 (talk · contribs). If there are other users updating the stats without evidence, the first line of defense against that is a heavy hand on the "undo"/"rollback" button. If you can show that that isn't working, feel free to re-request with evidence thereof. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 03:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Mastriano

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent disruptive editing. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 20:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest WP:APDS be invoked to semi the page through the month of November (when the election takes place). He is getting national attention constantly for his extreme views, and the talk page is seeing a constant stream of non-policy-based complaints from people about the (well-sourced) far-right label. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how that plays out. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black Lives Matter

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by autoconfirmed accounts. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement. I also set indefinite pending changes as insurance.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism going on for 5 weeks. Dhruv edits (talk) 04:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asatru Folk Assembly

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. There is a high level of edit warring. Often by user accounts and IP addresses for only for editing Asatru Folk Assembly page ‎and then abandoned or blocked (list below is since Jan 2022). Nearly all users have shown little interest in using talk page. Edits often provide no reason for changes or simply gives a misguiding reason such as correcting spelling. The page has had Temporary protected before due to disruptive edits but disruptive editing started up after it was removed.

Myotus (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Special:PrefixIndex

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 06:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I am generally not a fan of long-term protection of talk pages, but given that (i) this is a talk page of a special page (ii) it was protected earlier for 3 months and (iii) vandalism resumed immediately after the expiration of that protection, I thing 6 months is a reasonable duration Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. DeluxeVegan (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DeluxeVegan: Sorry to be lazy but there are a million recent edits at that page, and there is nothing on talk. Please identify some edits showing a problem. Diffs would be nice but just a couple of date/times would do. Johnuniq (talk) 10:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Johnuniq: No worries, there's blanking ([76], [77], [78], [79]), piracy spam, gibberish ([80], [81], [82]) and a load of other general unconstructive edits. Since the film released just yesterday I would expect this to last for quite a while. DeluxeVegan (talk) 11:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, any update on this? It's been two days and there's no sign of the disruption stopping. DeluxeVegan (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Hrsmn

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – See also User:0xDeadbeef/TurkcellVandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 08:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hip-Hop for Sale

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See also User:0xDeadbeef/TurkcellVandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 09:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkaru Vaari Paata

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced changes by IPs/new users resumed immediately after the previous protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fábio Carvalho (footballer, born 2002)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 11:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kitty murder

Reason: Vandalism and unsourced content 88.245.18.50 (talk) 12:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 07:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AK965: Please see the earlier request for this article above. With that many edits (and a couple I looked at were not WP:VAND), please identify some problems. Johnuniq (talk) 10:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Gah. It's a mess. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 European Rally Championship

Semi-protection: There is an anonymous IP (202.8.218.167) making the same edits relentlessly, including activities of living people and entities without references - in fact it is contradicting the sources that are given there. I've tried to source references for their edits myself but had no success, IMO it's vandalism. Anon IP will not engage in talk page chat, will not respond to feedback left on their talk page. IP has been temporarily banned multiple times for the same reason yet returns immediately to continue the same edits, including today having just served a one week ban. Given the IP only edits the one article and temporary bans serve no use, it could be a programmed bot. I would like to request the IP ban is full time or the page be protected. Rally Wonk (talk) 12:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: single IP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goblin (album)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding unsourced recording dates in the article throughout the months. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drip or Drown 2

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – An editor keep adding unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aytaç Şaşmaz

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced content by multiple editors who have ignored warning on their TP. MB 03:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined All involved are autoconfirmed, and ECP is off the table as there's no previous semi. Sources have been provided for the claim at issue; even if they're subpar sources, I don't think a full protection would help with that. Recommend discussing any further issues on talk. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

La casa de los famosos (season 2)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP users and ignore warnings on their talk pages. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 07:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. To quote what C.Fred said to the IP in their related ANEW report: This noticeboard is not a bludgeoning tool to get one's way in a dispute—especially when one is edit warring themselves to try to make the change. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Lion King

Reason: Semi protected indefinitely since 2008; I hope the change to pending changes or unprotection would have no vandal threats anymore. RapMonstaXY (talk) 10:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: . The protecting administrator is no longer active on Wikipedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caillou

Reason: The article will unprotected. 50.244.129.65 (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stem master

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent test editing by multiple IPs. Jalen Folf (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Women's T20 Challenge

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monkeypox

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Golem08 (talk) 13:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Deacon

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, or editing against consensus despite comments advising this in the text. Examples: [83], [84], [85], [86] Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mitski

Reason: Unsourced content and vandalism 88.245.18.50 (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ángel Di María

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing adding that his Paris Saint-Germain career is over (many IPs). Yes he announced his departure, but that departure will only happen on 1 July 2022. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World War II casualties of the Soviet Union

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP from many years ago whose trying to push their own pov on this page is back, and is trying to add their own original research. Mordencarfan (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:CV

Reason: repeated page blanking by IPs. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iryna Fedyshyn

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tow (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sunni dynasties

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors editing this kind of semi-controversial list article generally have no clue about WP:V and some kind of axe to grind; better to leave it to autoconfirmed accounts entirely. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 10:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Columbine effect

Reason: Vandalism or/and unsourced content 88.245.18.50 (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you the right article? Not seeing that currently --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, i think wrong. 88.245.18.50 (talk) 12:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deion Sanders

Reason: Persistent unsourced edits. Hunterb212 (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User warned. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ric Ocasek

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stubborn IP editor repeatedly changing date of birth against consensus, along with changing dates and source titles to fit their narrative. Could use protection because they have a dynamic address. Nohomersryan (talk) 07:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Guaidó

Semi-protection: Vandalism and unreferenced edits from IPs and unconfirmed users in the last weeks. NoonIcarus (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seljuk Empire

Reason: Full protection constant editing on infobox, trying to add stuff to the flag section. Beshogur (talk) 10:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yoakim Karchovski

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. WP:NOTHERE; WP:NATIONALIST; WP:SPA. Jingiby (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Capitanich

Reason: Article is currently the target of some very active POV-pushers. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benedicta Ward

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This person may have died. One user updated the article to past tense and put in a year of death, but no source. I reverted. Two other users (one IP, then one non-IP) made similar edits today. I've reverted 3 times and it seems someone doesn't want to stop. Requesting protection so we don't report her death prematurely. An obituary or other indication of death should be included to change a BLP to just a bio. FYI, I have left messages on 2 of the talk pages of the editors. Thank you. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I did a search for her under her name as the article title and name born by and I didn't get hits for an obituary. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's not a high volume of disruption, but there's also not a high need for edits from unregistered users. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jana Gana Mana (2022 film)

Reason: Ip users rapidly changing the box office collections without providing sources. Grabup (talk) 10:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter fandom

Reason: IPs keep adding an unnecessary non-free image. Poirot09 (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. *Angrily* El_C 19:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Le Sserafim

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 20:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2022

Sana (singer)

Reason: Unsourced content and vandalism 88.245.18.50 (talk) 12:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Sawayama

Reason: Unreliable sources, vandalism and unsourced content 88.245.18.50 (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Sawayama

Reason: Sorry for repeat, Unreliable sources, vandalism and unsourced content 88.245.18.50 (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stem mixing and mastering

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopper making test edits. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Sawayama

Reason: No one responded to my request from hours: Unsourced edits and vandalism 88.245.18.50 (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kay Burley

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Page used to be protected, but protection has expired. Straw17s (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Green Day

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Offline 00:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeshkumar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After Hirooxx got indeffed, an IP started hijacking the redirect similar to how the user did. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Redirect with no real reason for anyone to be editing it more than once a year or so, so just went with indef. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffany Espensen

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Large number of edits from IP editor of questionable quality (e.g. unsourced), without explanation, etc. Probably best to force this editor to the talk page to explain what they are trying to do. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stockton Heat

Temporary semi-protection: Team announced a move for next season and already people are changing the name and moving the article prematurely - before such a team name is even announced. Needs to be move-protected also. Echoedmyron (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Trying to avoid move protection. Please let me know. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Burundi

Reason: Resumption of vandalism after previous protection expired. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4052:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs). Pblocked from this page and a number of others. Also blocked the most recent IP sitewide 31h. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

St. Louis Blues

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GamersBaseball24 (talk) 04:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Weinstein Company

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Safari (web browser)

Reason: High level ip protection Panglima daeng (talk) 04:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please learn to edit a bit before working on "back-room" stuff like RFPP. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 164

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent refactoring of the closing summary of a RFC to change its meaning by IPs. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 05:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. Home Entertainment

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed sock puppets. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2002 Indianapolis 500

Reason: As its the 20th anniversary, I believe the race winner will be incorrectlyedited several times. DarkerDai (talk) 06:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @DarkerDai: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two instances of vandalism since 2018? Definitely not grounds for protection. Good catch on the recent subtle vandalism, though. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanuatu

Reason: Vandalism. 110.150.20.32 (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Chappelle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Recently in news, persistent disruptive editing/vandalism CaffeinAddict (talk) 01:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nishant Kumar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs keep removing the disambiguation hatnote to the more famous person of the same name, the article being a redirect recently converted into a deletion-worthy student biography. They're also removing the AfD template. 43.230.41.218 (talk · contribs) is on a week-long block for removing the hatnote. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MalnadachBot

Indefinite semi-protection: Speaking as MalnadachBot's operator, the only purpose this talk page serves is to trigger an emergency shutdown whenever the page is edited. This is meant to help any non-admins to stop the bot if/when it malfunctions. However as can be seen in the page history, this feature has been abused by anons numerous times which has disrupted bot operations. Every non autoconfirmed user edits to the page has been vandalism. Putting this page under semi protection will still have emergency shutdown available to autoconfirmed users and above. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ, if you can designate an outflow page for non-confirmed users (clearly marked as such), I'm willing to do that. El_C 12:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: I have modified the header at the top of bot userpage pointing non-confirmed users to WP:ANI to request stoppage. Also the bot talk page redirects to mine, so they can leave any message there to bring my attention. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. El_C 12:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Labor Party

Reason: Vandalism. 110.150.20.32 (talk) 08:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edison light bulb

Reason: Several recent attempts from different IPs to change 'vintage light bulb' to a specific person named bulb without providing a reference. (Each IP providing a different name) 109.152.150.186 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... The movie has been out for a very long time and even many movies came after this movie so I think there’s no need to protect it now . Phoenix14061990 (talk) 09:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Phoenix14061990. What page are you referring to? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, I don’t think the rationale works. “It can be unprotected because other movies exist” says nothing about the page, even unspecified CreecregofLife (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CreecregofLife. Your input is not required. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Target page not identified. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edvin Ryding

Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism.BabbaQ (talk) 10:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 11:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Rudberg

Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism. BabbaQ (talk) 10:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 11:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Sawayama

Reason: Useless sources, sorry for repeating for the third time 88.245.18.50 (talk) 10:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. IP, please stop mis-using this board. This is the 4th request (at least) in less than 24 hours. It's too much. Thank you. El_C 11:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed for one week --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

India

Reason: The protection is not necessary because there are not a lot of things that need to be protected in this article. RayAdvait (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That feels like a dubious claim CreecregofLife (talk) 11:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Article is protected as a discretionary sanction under WP:ARBIND. Favonian (talk) 13:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

template:Uw-ublock-yourmum

Reason: This template, just created and protected by anome, is currently full-protected. This seems excessive, especially considering none of the other uw templates are full protected. I think it should be lowered to either Template protection or semi protection 67.21.154.193 (talk) 14:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss with the administrator The Anome before posting here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've downgraded it to template protection. — The Anome (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahira Khan

Reason: The page has limited information As.mum86 (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The article has an extensive protection log for BLP violations, vandalism, and other disruption. It will remain as is. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arkhip Kuindzhi

Reason: Anachronistic POV vandalism started almost right after the last protection expired. I know how you might feel, but a Greek who lived his entire life in the Russian Empire is not Ukrainian in any way, shape or form. Sumanuil. 23:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luz Noceda

Semi-protection: As it is an article about an LGBTQ+ oriented character in a children's television show, it is prone to homophobic-related vandalism. Semi protection to only allow autoconfirmed users would be ideal. Mjeims (talk) 01:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pages do not get protected merely because they "may" be vandalised. See WP:Protection policy. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 03:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. El_C 12:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwania 3 (supercomputer)

Reason: There's someone changing the content into something wrong from some unknown IP address, in which is misleading the general public. I request for protection of this page to prevent further harm caused. Tony kang peppy (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Party of Australia

Reason: Vandalism. 110.150.20.32 (talk) 08:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 15:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Astle Hall

Reason: This is a page im working on as a hobby in my spare time. I have all the relevant information as I live there and im collecting information of local people who know the historty of the house and whos lived there. Im trying to write up but every few hours someone deletes it and puts something irrelevant or even false! Please can you protect my page and make it so that i can only edit it. Thank you TomCaunce3 (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. TomCaunce3, that isn't even technically possible, but in any case,, Wikipedia is a collaborative project, so you are expected to engage with other editors at the article talk page (Talk:Astle Hall). Good luck. El_C 12:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Premier Sports (Philippine TV channel)

Reason: Protect the page from Vandalism. MaiLab Cesko (talk) 12:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TAP TV

Reason: Vandalism on that IP: 180.195.204.226 (talk) MaiLab Cesko (talk) 12:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:CEE Spring 2022

Reason: A lot of new users (none seem to be autoconfirmed) are making non-constructive edits to the page every day. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 13:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azovstal iron and steel works

Pending changes: Decent amount of IP editing and reverts going on. PC would be an unobtrusive way to increase article quality. –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 15:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dyson (company)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A return of long-term edit warring. IP shows no interest in communication and is ignoring the note requesting not to change the company's country. — Czello 14:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mable Lee

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; NB I mistakenly applied protection here, entirely inappropriate in the circumstances. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Melendez

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Perron

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Bastoni

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and new users updating footballer's club without sourcing. Looks like trade rumors swirling but no transaction happened yet per my quick search. Nsevs • Talk 15:54, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfriForum

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Meat or sock puppets, same geolocation, same pov edits. Doug Weller talk 16:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Candlepin bowling

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Do I Have to Do

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hand on Your Heart

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Andrewbf. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing's Gonna Stop Me Now (Samantha Fox song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Andrewbf. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel Castro kidnappings

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from anonymous users every few weeks or so. wizzito | say hello! 18:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of barrios and sectors of San Sebastián, Puerto Rico

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla Braxton

Reason: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Mary (folklore)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, certainly more edits vandalizing and reverting than adding info. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 20:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States television markets

Reason: IP editor editing, en masse, longstanding, FCC designated TV markets using TV guide listings. There is currently a discussion going on about the edits in talk page under Conflicting information section. Its edits should be reverted, also. The FCC makes market determinations and not TV listings. P37307 (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Zenz

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — Czello 20:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I knew when I heard him on BBC News this morning his page would be getting hit again today. BusterD (talk) 21:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting

Reason: Heavily edited due to current event. Needs protection to prevent vandalism JorieLeisure (talk) 21:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also move protected for now. BusterD (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

25 May 2022

It Comes

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 02:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PinkPantheress

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of unverified/inaccurate information, other BLP violations. benǝʇᴉɯ 03:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:NinjaRobotPirate

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – We can't have anymore of Nate's rudeness. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's Glam-girlz, not Nate Speed, although they're easily confused. Either way, NinjaRobotPirate is an administrator and can decide for himself whether his talkpage needs to be protected. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done NinjaRobotPirate is able to protect their talk page if needed. If a short period of protection is required when they are not around, I’m sure someone else will step up. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While I'm not sure if protecting one's own talk page is recommendable enough to name this technical ability as a decline reason, and while protecting user talk pages even against the will of the user may be necessary in cases of extreme disruption, this declined request here can be safely archived for now. NinjaRobotPirate would at very least request semi-protection if needed.
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putinism

Semi-protection Rampant trolling by an IP hopper who wants us to discuss[87]: "Russian soldiers were quickly killed by brave Ukrainian defenders of democratic European ways", "Americans quickly elected a much better, pro-Western and pro-NATO president, who supports the defense of Europe!", "Putin is hiding in his cold, dark and wet bunker somewhere in the Uran mountains", "he will hopefully be extradited to Haag or Tel Aviv, where he will be tried and hanged quickly".

And is also removing my message critical of this trolling.[88]

Protection of main Putinism won't hurt either because the article was also hit by this troll's attempts.[89] Orientls (talk) 08:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan

Reason: Two socks so far attempting to get the SPI speedily deleted. Don't think more attempts of this are needed. ([90] [91] [92]) Magitroopa (talk) 15:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably keep it as bait. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brenden Aaronson

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Benjamin112 ☎ 15:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Danes

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Frequent addition of WP:BLOATED version without gaining consensus prior hand for 1 week now. TolWol56 (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yuzuru Hanyu

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent editing by user Margaret Habibie violating neutral point of view on BLP on statement which has been approved during article's GA process. User refused to communicate. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 01:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

North Macedonia at the Olympics

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, e.g., repeated removal of content from this and other articles on Balkan states at the Olympics (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, etc.) Jeff in CA (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Depp

Reason: In light of the controversy surrounding the current televised court case between Depp and his ex-wife, there's been an attempt to discredit the list of descendants of Elizabeth Key Grinstead, suggesting that Depp is not a descendant. However, the information has been published on Wikipedia for, at least, a decade without any issue. It's possible that those siding with the case Defendant are trying to erase this information from Wikipedia, because they're also targeting the page for Elizabeth Key Grinstead page. LineageFirst (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the page may need protection from your editing, which could be selectively applied in the form of a block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per TBF. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Key Grinstead

Reason: In light of the controversy surrounding the current televised court case between Depp and his ex-wife, there's been an attempt to discredit the list of descendants of Elizabeth Key Grinstead, including the suggestion that Depp is not a descendant. However, the information has been published on Wikipedia for, at least, a decade without any issue. It's possible that those siding with the case Defendant are trying to erase this information from Wikipedia because they're also targeting the page for Johnny Depp. LineageFirst (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per TBF. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Principles

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – no reason for IP to the page. Moxy- 22:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done not all that much recent activity, and it'd be somewhat ironic to protect the page on principles... TonyBallioni (talk) 23:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Katz (classicist)

Reason: The article is subject to large amounts of edits by both IP Editors and by new accounts. Because of constant intermediate edits, many of the changes editors have done is not reversible automatically and thus must be done manually. Joshua Katz has, in recent days, gained nationwide attention over his dismissal from Princeton University and the article is in desperate need for some basic protection. GuardianH (talk) 02:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @TonyBallioni ! Unfortunately, because of the extended confirmed protection, I am unable to reverse the edits back to the article before the hot edit-mess. I created the article Joshua Katz (classicist) a few days ago and authored almost the entire article—I would very much like to revert the article back to the state it was just a few hours ago before the load of editors came in. Is there any way for this to be done? GuardianH (talk) 02:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
GuardianH gave you +extendedconfirmed because you weren't the target of the protection and are so close to getting it anyway. I see Drmies is also active there and editing stuff not related to potential BLP problems, so I'd coordinate with him/on the talk page before doing a blanket restore. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
TonyBallioni, the editor was being a bit ... enthusiastic in their writing, and seems to take it all a bit too personally. But we'll see; more attention from seasoned editors would be a good thing. I don't see any BLP problems right now--just an article that was too promotional. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Drmies, yeah, when I was looking at it I saw some overly detailed stuff on the accusations, etc. and back and forth over that in the history. Given the topic and that professors being fired tends to always be controversial, went with ECP on a BLP as a DS to hopefully let things cool down and let more experienced editors in. If you don't think its warranted, I'm fine reducing it (I know you're involved, but more out of respect for your experience with these things.) Same offer goes to any other admin. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Pandya

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page has been protected 3 times due to disruptive edits by several IPs. However, it was short duration such as a week. When the protection expire the IP users starts the disruptive edits by adding confusion text, probably from Google translation which would mislead readers. Therefore, It needs long / indefinite protection. AntanO 03:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for extended confirmed protection, because most problem edits are from IPs or non-autoconfirmed users. And the problems are not frequent enough to require semi-protection. Pending Change protection seems to be what is called for here.  MelanieN (talk) 04:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21st Century Film Corporation

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – You know who is back again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure if protecting this will actually accomplish anything... The recent disruption is purely in the edit summaries. It's really bad edit summary disruption, to be clear, but it's not reader-facing, and it's not like she cares a lot about the articles she targets; if not this one it'll just be another. But, this does meet the standard criteria for a short-term semi, so if another sysop thinks that worthwhile, I won't object. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes, I think it is disruptive enough, and the IPs are changeable so blocking won't help.MelanieN (talk) 04:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Hinson

Reason: High level of vandalism from shifting IPs, at least since the beginning of the year. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Avalanche

Reason: High level of IP vandalism BattleshipMan (talk) 05:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Gervais

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. In the news currently - persistent vandalism/disruptive editing. CaffeinAddict (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Utah Jazz

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Storchy (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From April to this day, the vandalism on this page remains ongoing. Orientls (talk) 08:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uvalde, Texas

Reason: Vandalism Melihthewikilover (talk) 04:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is being very heavily edited, but I am not seeing serious problems. MelanieN (talk) 04:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Buffalo shooting

Semi-protection: More disruptive edits/vandalism effectively the second this article became unprotected. I think it needs longer. Endwise (talk) 06:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raai Laxmi

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: DaxServer, she says in that 2017 interview that she's 26, so how could it be 1979? El_C 12:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C The DOB was updated per VRTS ticket # 2016051310004058 by Geniac in Special:Diff/1087976281. Nothing more I could do — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Be that as it may, the source attributing 1979 does not actually reflect that birth date (i.e. is a decade off). So that self-contradiction needs to be resolved. We can't fault users (unconfirmed or otherwise) for aligning the info with the citation in question. El_C 13:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is valid. How do you suggest one, or maybe I, counter the VRTS ticket [in this scenario] ? Should I put a footnote explaining the same (and move the citation into the footnote stating sourcing and a previous interview contradicts with the VRTS identification) ? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to ping @El C — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really sure. Maybe bring the matter to WP:BLPN (with a note to that discussion linked on the article talk page)...? It's probably beyond the scope of RfPP to address, in any case. El_C 13:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi El C and DaxServer, I'm surprised I have to point to WP:SOURCE and remove challenged material that was re-added without a published source. 🙂 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know a VRT ticket was considered a reliable, independent sources with a reputation for fact checking. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now you know! El_C 11:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CBI 5: The Brain

Reason: IP users constantly changing Box-office collection without providing reliable sources. Grabup (talk) 06:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tomara dynasty

Reason: High level of vandalism and disruptive edits. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 08:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Second request in as many days....2 week long dack and forth. Moxy- 21:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MelanieN: Courtesy ping, since you declined the previous. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping, but since I commented on the previous request, I will leave it for another admin to evaluate this one. -- MelanieN (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is the thing: the expectation these days in certain areas of the project seems to be that if you fully-protect a page, you must follow up on the dispute or disputes. Which I don't know how many admins would be willing to do. So, while full protection is clearly called for right now I, at least, am holding off for that reason. El_C 11:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had seen the previous request and not taken action because most edit warring on extended-confirmed-protected pages can be resolved through warnings and (rarely, mostly partial) blocks. I acknowledge, though, that this may be the wrong approach if a topic attracts random reverts from experienced bypassers. The disruption from these currently appears to be manageably low-frequent enough. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that gets tempered by 1RR, so it spreads over a number of users. El_C 11:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., in my judgement, the edit-warring is severe enough for a short-term full protection, but is not sufficient for a long-term protection. Now, in a week, protection is going to expire, I set pending changes to avoid immediate damage, but in principle the protection must be restored to extended confirmed as soon as possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ateez

Reason: Heavy vandalism, the previous semi-protection on the page expired. Multiple new users and IP users making non-sense edits deliberately. There were 50+ edits in the past 24 hours, and vandalism is still on going. Alykr81 (talk) 00:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holy moly! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thom Bresh

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced or badly sourced content. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Singla

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Subject was arrested today. IP keeps adding "sacked" to replace "removed" from office. Wont respond to user talk or article talk threads. Venkat TL (talk) 14:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For what it's worth, "sacked" is used extensively in multiple reliable sources [93]. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Becky G

Reason: Unsourced content and vandalism Melihthewikilover (talk) 10:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of vice presidents of the Philippines

Temporary semi-protection: As a result of the 2022 Philippine presidential election (a protected page), multiple IPs and users adding Sara Duterte as the 15th vice president. She is not yet sworn-in, and officially is not the vice president before June 30. Requesting semi-protection till then. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC). Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 40 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radha Soami Satsang Beas

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding the same deleted content without giving any reason. Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 18:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Konaseema district

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring over the name, for context see [94], possibly enforce WP:ARBIND. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally apply move-protection, the page was moved a few times within the last week — DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Move protected indefinitely. El_C 12:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Ko

Reason: Vandalism Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CCFL inverter

Reason: It is encountering a total page deletion (redirecting). I would like to ask for protection once and discuss it. Neotesla (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Neotesla, I don't understand. What issues are facing the redirect? El_C 16:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Pretty sure CCFL inverter is the intended target, so I have changed the request accordingly. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, over-reverting continues by certain editors. Even unnecessary parts have been deleted. Neotesla (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema district

Reason: High level IP disruptive editing Thewikizoomer (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ulriken

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nythar (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guy_Mettan

Reason: IP vandalism - ranges confirm globally blocked user:FFA P-16 Anidaat (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anidaat, that would be an WP:SPI matter. Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 11:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leona Lewis

Reason: Possible unsourced content edits Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Mules

Reason: The content is undeniably partisan. In order for Wikipedia to have any legitimacy, it needs to make an attempt at neutrality. The opening sentence says, the documentary "falsely" claimed mules were illegally used in the 2020 election. What is wrong with just saying that the documentary "claims" or "alleges" mules were illegally used in the 2020 election? Criticism and fact checking are fine anyone who denies the existence of voter fraud in the U.S. needs to go to Heritage's online database, where they will find 1,285 proven instances of it—including 1,110 criminal convictions (Newsweek). Many of the "fact checks" in this Wikipedia post are not only biased but contain logic fallacies. Page protection should be used to protect fair and balanced material from corruption, not to prevent it. 2601:603:1580:89D0:51E8:CF55:2CC3:3824 (talk) 22:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not the complaints department. If you have suggestions for improving the article, please make them on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly suggest you find a different hill to fight on, as this article seems to me to fall under the post-1992 American politics discretionary sanctions. And page protection is not a judgment on article content. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We’re going to be getting a lot of these for a while, aren’t we? CreecregofLife (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
2000 Mules has already been brought here so many times that I watchlisted the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I think this was fourth or fifth in just a few days since release. I wouldn’t be surprised if it gets Kashimir Files-level persistence CreecregofLife (talk) 00:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. If you have suggestions for improving the article, please make them on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mitski

Reason: False information, vandalism and unsourced content Melihthewikilover (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of presidents of the Philippines

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple users and IPs changing current title holder before official inauguration of new president on June 30, 2022. Ganmatthew (talk) 15:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xiao Zhan

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Dearnurulsky (talk) 15:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Dearnurulsky: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round Here (Florida Georgia Line song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. PAVLOV (talk) 16:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Burnley F.C.

Reason: High level of vandalism, mostly from IP Addresses. It's been a busy few days with the club's relegation last weekend and the upcoming appointment of a new manager, so the page has attracted people who either are trying to be "funny" or who are stating misinformation. Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers: The Last Knight

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent, multiple IPs adding nonconstructive changes. Reverted article to the -best I can tell- last good version. Jip Orlando (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mulan (1998 film)

Reason: Considering unprotection or PC because it has been semi since 2008 and I wanted to let the page test if vandals are still there. RapMonstaXY (talk) 13:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: . The protecting administrator is no longer active on Wikipedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Let's try it out. Ping me if the test fails. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thom Bresh

Unprotection: Edit warring over inserting unreliable sources on Bresh's death. Issue is now moot as a reliable source has been found. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pinging Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Narayani Sena

Reason: Addition of poorly, unreferenced material by certain caste pov IPs to create a false impression of relating 19th century group with a mythological group. I request for some protection on this page RS6784 (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been constant addition of poorly referenced materials which have been removed in the past just to connect a mythological group with a present day Yadav, Ahir community. The details on the page are exactly opposite to points put up by these IPs. The same IPs constantly attack editors on talk page of article with very choices of abuses. I suspect a lot of them are banned sock accounts. In line with all this I request for protection on this page. RS6784 (talk) 07:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RS6784: Help is on the way. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Not sure that describing the person with whom you are in a content dispute in unfavorable terms adds anything to a request. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen, Davao del Norte ‎

Reason: Persistent and high level of IP vandalism P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panabo

Reason: Persistent and high level of IP vandalism. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Galvão Bueno

Reason: Extreme repeated vandalism PaienPaien (talk) 15:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done One instance of vandalism in 2022 does not constitute "extreme repeated vandalism." OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine/Archive 5

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by banned LTA; also no need to edit this finished archive. EthanGaming7640 18:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alha

Reason: Regular disruptive activity by IPs and newly socks overriding the previous consensus on it by senior editor. RS6784 (talk) 08:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Admin, for my wrongly framing of words here. My point is as the page had some consensus based decision in the past by editors and now newly SPAs are active on it with very disruptive editing. You can see the 1-2 weeks activity on that page, I think considering all this there should be some protection. Apologies once again for wrong choice of words. RS6784 (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: We have no senior editors. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User is DS alerted and has been warned twice for disruption. If they persist, they will be subject to escalating blocks. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Will need semi protection --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benedicta Ward

Reason: Let's extend this, please. Another IP user has attempted to add a date of death w/o a citation (looks like they tried to fake a citation in the infobox). I reverted. I have talked on the talk page and on user/IP pages. Thanks. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uvalde, Texas

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – current event vandalism stuff. wizzito | say hello! 20:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

26 May 2022

Rana Sanaullah

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rana Sanaullah

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism from multiple IPs. Lcodyh803 (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Demi Lovato

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Bring back indefinite semi!!!. Dolfi2000 (talk) 23:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fler

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 01:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Timeline of the far future

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing but garbage comments and WP:NOTFORUM in the past few days. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Antandrus (talk) 03:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Australia

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Cinderella157 (talk) 02:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Antandrus (talk) 03:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jihadi John

Reason: Slow motion edit warring by an IP since May 17 multiple editors reverting no talk discussions. GreenC 04:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Shelby

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Some kind of 'meme' vandalism. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Barker

Reason: Vandalism and unsourced content Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Boss Baby

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 22:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gucci Mane

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by users. Dolfi2000 (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Semi-protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert (doll)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – periodic vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 21:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Treyarch

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – periodic vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 21:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vitamin D

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – vandalism/unsourced content problem. wizzito | say hello! 21:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awan (tribe)

Full protection Edit warring against talk page consensus and use of poor edit summaries to justify reverts. Orientls (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most of the problems seem to be coming from IP addresses, prior protection of 2 years was not long enough, apparently. Upped it to 5. Jayron32 12:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jet set

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/reliable sources quiz

Indefinite semi-protection: To match the rest of the Help:Introduction pages to avoid disruption from test edits. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Jayron32 12:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aimee Marcos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A high rate of IPs removing sources with no reason given, and the subject of the article does not appear to have been in the news lately, so the surge of activity is not justified. The vandalizing IPs are from different geographical regions, but could be a VPN hopping. Asking for a temporary PP to disallow IP edits for little while. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President of Burundi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malassay

Reason: IP keeps reverting multiple users and just blanked my warning on their talk page. Magherbin (talk) 05:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jackfruit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP changes with no talk page responses to an open discussion. Two IPs and two named editors are making the same minor undue edit to the lede, which is present under the History section. Named editors have been warned about WP:DE. Zefr (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wide-ranging dispute involving multiple regular users. Followed standard policy, and protected the WP:WRONGVERSION. Please use talk page to establish consensus. Will unprotect if consensus is established on talk page. Jayron32 12:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in Lebanon

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent anon additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content, to the pie chart at the top of the article. Storchy (talk) 11:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arin Mirkan

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. Semsûrî (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Let's try this again: Done. Logged AE action. El_C 12:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Labor Party

Reason: Persistent vandalism. TheFattyClan (talk) 07:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Janelle Monáe

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent addition of unsourced relationship/dating content to Personal life section by IP users. Mann Mann (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Magic

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Such-change47 (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suraj Mal

Reason: Disruptive editing by IP range 2402:8100:2259:6F28:E4A8:F65:34C6:7FFB and other accounts. POV pushing of exaggerated maps from non reliable secondary works, diff and using online blogs as a source, no respect for three revert rule, either. Semi protection is badly needed here, diff, diff, diff etc. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 12:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normal admin action. Does not invoke DS. Jayron32 12:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Coronation Street characters

Reason: Vandalism is no longer frequent on the page and most pending change reviewers are unfamiliar with the subject so ascertaining vandalism from a good edit is difficult for them. The page has a number of watchers who are familiar with the subject and edit it regularly, so I think it's safe to decrease from pending changes. I'll re-request protection if it ever gets bad again. – DarkGlow • 10:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected. Page hasn't been protected since January 11, 2021. Jayron32 12:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assault rifle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. VQuakr (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A user ArsenalAtletico2017 was blocked for disruptively editing this and related articles. Since then, they have created two sockpuppet accounts to edit this article (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArsenalAtletico2017). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network (Philippine TV channel)

Reason: Semi for a long time, I hope pc or unprotection should test out if vandals are still target. RapMonstaXY (talk) 13:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: . Protected by Ged UK in November 2010. Pinging Ged UK for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prashanth Neel

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced changes/edit warring by IPs/new users over the subject's ethnicity and birthplace since the past protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 14:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Berry stark (talk · contribs). Jayron32 12:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blink-182

Reason: Poorly sourced content or false informations Melihthewikilover (talk) 18:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 12:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles L. Venable

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Has been edited by multiple users with seeming COI, removing unflattering information and adding uncited facts. Cerebral726 (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Jayron32 12:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

XXXTentacion discography

Reason: WP:MUG-violating IPs are back. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steve (Minecraft)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 21:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of North Korea

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 21:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hasn't been edited, at all, in over 2 weeks. Jayron32 12:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Five Nights at Freddy's (video game)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 21:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 1 edit since May 10, and that wasn't vandalism. Jayron32 12:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of deadliest animals to humans

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – target of LTA (WP:LTA/D86), other disruptive editing. wizzito | say hello! 21:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less than a dozen edits in 2022; certainly not worth protecting. Jayron32 12:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slinky

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 22:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 1 edit since March. And that wasn't vandalism. Jayron32 12:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion in Japan

Reason: The page "Abortion in Japan" was recently radically changed by an unnamed user with the IP address 42.115.159.169, that IP address was subsequently blocked. The changes they made on the page were incorrect, so i reverted it. However, another unnamed user with the IP address 126.72.234.100 has now restored the exact same version that 42.115.159.169 made, and i suspect that this is the same person trying to evade the blocking of their previous IP address on Wikipedia. I think there is a need to inquire about that. Snarcky1996 (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits in a month is not too much to keep up with via normal means. If this becomes more rapid or frequent than that, please re-nominate for protection.Jayron32 12:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:XXXTentacion

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Near as I can tell, one fan posted a WP:NOTFORUM-type post, and there's nothing else there. We can handle this by just reverting it. Jayron32 12:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seventeen (South Korean band)

Reason: Repeated elimination or modification of information without any justification or source. Periodic vandalism. Oscarcho00 (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 12:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recent edit warring by Extended Confirmed editors. Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 01:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Use WP:DR to solve disputes on talk page, or try WP:ANEW if someone violates WP:3RR or is otherwise edit warring. Jayron32 12:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

M Miraz Hossain

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – disruptive moves during ongoing afd (3 days running). – robertsky (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: page deleted. El_C 12:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Moot.Jayron32 12:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prashanth Neel

Temporary protection: removal of sources, addition of unsourced content by new and anons Adakiko (talk) 04:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. See above. Jayron32 12:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Walling

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and new users' persistent vandalism. PAVLOV (talk) 11:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 185.130.92.20 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Jayron32 12:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sea of Azov

Reason: IP editor (from a range) adding incorrect information and reverting editors adding the correct information AntientNestor (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting

Add {{current event}}. TheFattyClan (talk) 07:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page. The talk page is unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per aboveJayron32 12:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rukmini

Reason: Repeated additon of unsourced content on page by auto confirmed users User:Pointn and User:Chronikhiles from last few days. Major biased changes under the name of minor changes are being done without providing WP:RS or any edit summary. It all result in compromising the readability and neutrality of page. Kindly, increase the protection from auto confirmed to extended confirmed users. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 06:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: What I see is you edit warring. Please sort it out on the talk page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahir clans

Reason: A new SPA, is constantly active blanking content. I request for attention as well as some kind of protection on the page. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 17:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Liotta

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 16:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. El_C 17:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

27 May 2022

2000_Mules

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because, as can be seen from the talk page, this lock is clearly being used by an editor to stiffle a valid objection to use of the term 'falsely' in the first sentence. The term 'alleges' or similar would suffice without biasing one way or the other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.234.196 (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu: we’ve got another one CreecregofLife (talk) 19:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page. The talk page is unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua București

Reason: Semi-protection is enough. Also, the information displayed now is incorrect. The page was given protection after Topcalcio/Realnewsnews vandalised it. Both accounts have been confirmed as a sockpuppet of Goalandgoal. Both accounts are blocked indefinitely. Please restore the info as it was on April 6 (last edited by user The Banner). Dante4786 (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page was protected due to edit warring over the content. Has consensus on the content been reached on the talk page? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No need to involve the talk page just because a user used a sucketppupet to vandalise the page. I was requesting for the content to return to its previous "form", which was the same for basically a year. Anyway, the admin that was involved understood what I said and agreed with my request. My request was granted, so I guess you can erase (or archive) this. Thank you for your time :) And sorry if I didn't explain this very well. Dante4786 (talk) 17:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. OK, thank you. I'll mark this as done. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fano (militia)

Reason: Fano (militia) is generally the young people of Amhara, Ethiopia. It is impossible to blame Fano as a specified organized group. All the young people of the Amhara are called Fano. There is a clear difference between Fano and militia. Fano is the youngest community member of the people of Amhara whereas militia is a government-based organized group, especially constituting ex-soldiers. And, Fano is not a protest group rather it follows the values and principles of the people of Amhara in their everyday movements and activities. Blaming Fano as a rebel group is equal to accusing the people of Amhara as an unruly community. This type of overgeneralized accusing of a particular community including Amhara is not acceptable and should be stopped. Fano is the part and parcel of the people of Amhara. 197.156.108.6 (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of this page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and 500 edits as a result of arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBHOA)--CreecregofLife (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. What CreecregofLife said. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quandale dingle

Reason: More edits would be necessary. Uiy (talk) 19:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More necessary for what? CreecregofLife (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. No such page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 7)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until the season is over. I don't think at this stage IPs or overzealous fans are going to adhere to MOS:ACCESS or allow some stability in the article. There's been some terrible instability around deleting of tables, reformatting and organising information that is not compliant with MOS:TABLE and WP:COLOR. There were heated discussions at multiple admin interventions here and here around previous/other series of Drag Race. Safest bet is to ask editors to post updates on the talkpage instead. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are IPs and new users a net negative on this article? They also appear to be adding some useful content. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And probably too busy for PC. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. It looks like a good number of the edits here are in good faith. bibliomaniac15 04:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeet filmography

Reason: People Making So much Wrong information without any Reference Thenfsa (talk) 10:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Granted, is currently edited actively, but not seeing a lot of disruption. Thenfsa, feel free to provide WP:DIFFs, in case I'm missing something. El_C 17:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kitty murder

Reason: Page unprotected and there might be false info edits again Melihthewikilover (talk) 19:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Melihthewikilover:We talked about this when you were editing as an IP. We do not protect "just in case". --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i'm sorry. As i said i will now just be a editor, and i will only request protection only one time a day. Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. You have proven once again that you need to not post to WP:RFPP, even if you got lucky. I will now partial block this account for disruption at RFPP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rina Sawayama

Reason: Unsourced content and false information Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes i already requested it 4 times when i was a IP user. Melihthewikilover (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. You're replying to a bot, not a person. Once again, please stop spamming this request over and over and over again, with any account. El_C 12:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I PB'd an anon that did the four times. I guess this is the connection I need to PB the account too --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, man. El_C 17:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NXT In Your House (2022)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users add unsourced content/changes to Matches section. Mann Mann (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Rhett

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talysh people

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The statistics of the Talysh people keeps getting altered by IPs/new accounts, it's quite problematic. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WTRF-TV

Reason: Edit disputes. Further information on talk page concerning updating information that keeps getting reverted back to the outdated and biased information, with information that hasn't been correct about the station for years, and asking for sources for types of information that has either been sourced from official sites or that is allowed to exist on similar TV station entries without any sources. Person doing the reverts refuses to discuss on the talk page of the entry, even when I have repeatedly went to the talk page to avoid edit warring for this page. User who reverts has been warned before on their own talk page about this, as user has seemly done this with another page. Seems to be two who refuses to allow any new or updated info to be added, regardless of if it is sourced or not. Darkpower (talk) 18:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Binny and the Ghost

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of WP:LTA/WKHF. wizzito | say hello! 19:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Nun 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of WP:LTA/WKHF. wizzito | say hello! 19:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Conjuring Universe

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of WP:LTA/WKHF. wizzito | say hello! 19:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Kratts

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of WP:LTA/WKHF. (all pages relating to them that I have requested have been edited by them today). wizzito | say hello! 19:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Groove Phi Groove

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism Thabiso.magagula (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An odd request from a user whose entire history consists of one edit to the page, undoing it and then coming here. The page may need protection, but I'd rather hold off for now. There are at least three experienced editors watching it, who understand what is likely to be removed.Naraht (talk) 20:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per Naraht. I'll note that most of the IP edits are claiming to be the same person President of GphiG (talk · contribs) has claimed to be. That account is now softblocked, but the user is welcome to rename or create a new account, so unless there's a resumption of IP disruption, I don't see a need to protect the page due to one person's actions. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:RandomCanadian

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being vandalised by some random socks. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Hopefully they will move on. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Future Nostalgia Tour

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Unstable. Oroborvs (talk) 20:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I note that some of the additions of unsourced content have come from an autoconfirmed account. @Oscarozzi: I hope you heed Oroborvs' warning about unreliable sources. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 03:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orihime Inoue

Reason: Persistent vandalism LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on highly trafficked new page. Kbabej (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined surprisingly, not seeing all that much UP activity at all. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grizzly bear

Reason: high level of IP vandalism Askarion 💬●✒️ 21:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AP Dhillon

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is constant vandalism on the page. People who are not registered users keep editing and changing where the singer is from. It would be good to have the page protected indefinitely to prevent such people from doing this vandalism. User:Yellow alligator 21:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 04:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Snakes on a Plane

Reason: A series of IP addresses have been submitting false/unsubstantiated information, namely about crime boss Eddie Kim (no evidence of anything beyond him being a gang boss and the catalyst behind the snakes). DawgDeputy (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Carlos (footballer, born 1993)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits that need checking and reverting. JMHamo (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 04:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Police

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 00:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tammy Lynn Sytch

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated IP edits removing sourced information with "typo" as edit summary. Attempted to start a discussion on talk page about why they were removing it but no responses. WikiVirusC(talk) 01:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Asghar Khan

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption resumed just a couple days after protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

"change is a neo-Nazi unit to is a nationalist unit" 2A01:CB00:38A:A00:313A:9155:4C06:238D (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The term already has a [disputed – discuss] tag. You can join the discussion instead. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – What Tbhotch wrote. Favonian (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion in the United States

Reason: A new editor and an IP have been adding inaccurate information about current laws. If anything, please watchlist this article to prevent further disruption. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 23:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined SouthernCaliforniaExploration is already autoconfirmed, and the IP disruption is minimal. Both parties are at 3RR, and both seem to have recognized this and stopped, so I don't currently see a need for administrative action on that front. I do wonder if the page would benefit from a 1RR or consensus required, though, at least for a few months. Thoughts, anyone? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 03:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm involved in the content dispute, and the article currently includes inaccurate original research that has been discussed at length at SCE's Talk page without a resolution. Wtmitchell and I tried to fix the article but SCE continued to revert their WP:OR version back in. My current concerns are 1) how to effectively communicate with an editor who has disrupted the article by adding misleading information, and 2) how to remove the misleading information so the article can instead reflect information from the sources. Beccaynr (talk) 04:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Beccaynr: Well, a discussion on talk would be the best way forward for the current matter. I've also left them the same alerts I just left you, for the abortion and AmPol DS regimes. In terms of avoiding a repeat of this kind of edit war, that's why I'm mulling over 1RR or consensus required. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, Tamzin, and at this point, I have taken the article off my watchlist and I am disengaging. I feel I have already had a thorough discussion with SCE, and at this point it seems best for me to leave it to others to remove the misleading and inaccurate original research from the article. Beccaynr (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Titan the Robot

Reason: For almost 14 years the fact that "Titan the Robot" is a costume worn by an actor and not a robot has been repeatedly been deleted from the Wikipedia page to be in accordance with the company's website. The company omits any details about "Titans" true nature so as to not commit false advertising while at the same time trying to maintain the illusion of a real robot. Deletions have been done by a user called "Titan the Robot" until that user was blocked permanently. Since then deletions are done by IP-users. Request to protect the page in its current form that states the correct nature of the subject of the page. MiBerG (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The edit of 4 May, which you just reverted, seems to be the first time in years that anyone's tried to claim Titan is a real robot. Unless I'm missing something, the last such time was November 2018, reverted March 2019. This article looks like a good candidate for long-term pending changes, but I'm hesitant to start that off when there have been no previous protections and not a lot of recent activity. So for now, Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But if someone tries to again push the idea that it's a real robot, I would support a 3-month trial of pending changes. Feel free to ping me if that happens. I'll watchlist the page for good measure. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTV Romania

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More Nate Speed sock puppets. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined. Romanian TV means this is Glam-girlz, not Nate. Glam-girlz isn't one of those sockmasters who obsesses over a few articles and if you protect them she might go away. She also isn't putting any disruptive content into the articles themselves; it's purely in the edit summaries, which our readers don't see. Given that she's going to be targeting some article, I don't see how it benefits the encyclopedia to force her away from articles that recent change patrollers now have watchlisted, and toward brand new ones. Just revert, block, and ignore. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Patrick Butler

Reason: New Afc, autoconfirmed protection requested to prevent WP:COI Filmforme (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Vrbanja Bridge

Reason: vandalism, today's featured article Turini2 (talk) 07:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Peacemaker67. Favonian (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OF/France

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Skjoldbro (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A group of pages that has been targeted by Philippines IP vandal range

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Philippines IP vandal is back. Please protect these pages as they are the primary target of the vandal IP range. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 09:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. All protected for one month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interest (emotion)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long history of disruption; no constructive edits since March 2020. –Sonicwave talk 04:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Connor McDavid

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Usual silly sports-related "trash talk" vandalism since his team is in the NHL playoffs. — GhostRiver 05:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AGM-183 ARRW

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism/PAs. BilCat (talk) 06:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diocesan School for Girls, Auckland

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Penguins666. Whether socking or a couple of bored schoolkids; a week or two of semi-protection seems reasonable. Jack Frost (talk) 06:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpa: The Rise

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Regular unsourced edits by IPs since the previous protection expired with atleast 2-3 reverts/day over the past month. Ab207 (talk) 06:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiara Advani

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism since previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerhead

Reason: Vandalism (clearly a target for vandalism for obvious reasons). 58.105.161.125 (talk) 10:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Favonian (talk) 10:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil

Reason: Vandalism after unprotection. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marko Filipović

Reason: Persistent vandalism - problems from many different IPs since the last protection expired. Entranced98 (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Kelly

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after unprotected (per an RfPP request), plus as an Australian I can tell you he is quite a disliked politician, so vandalism will occur all the time from Australian IPs. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 08:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 14:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cassia fistula

Reason: Persistent edit warring with Kerala content, initially added by a registered editor and then restored by varying IPs. Very similar to edit warring that has taken place on now-protected Jackfruit, also Indian elephant. Not engaging on any Talk pages. Similar edit summaries. Declangi (talk) 09:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 14:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2002 Indianapolis 500

Reason: Winner keeps incorrectly being amended to Paul Tracey. It is currently the 20th anniversary so it may be more common. DarkerDai (talk) 11:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To get through the long weekend; after which interest will likely wane again. Jayron32 14:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arado Ar 196

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoax added by IP, claims an Ar 196 as captured by Greece in 1941 providing varying sources but none of them confirms it. Reverted IP multiple times but IP edit-wars to keep it in. Denniss (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 14:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelos Zappas‎, Konstantinos Zappas‎, Petros Zappas‎

Reason: Pages are currently under a sockpuppet vandalising campaign. See the following links: [95] [96] [97]. Super Ψ Dro 15:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isle of Man

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scoville scale

Reason: Persistent vandalism over the past few days, especially today. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Havelock Academy

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EeOneGuy

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Thermopylae

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism (10 reverts in the last 30 days). T8612 (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting

Semi-protection: Article is still experiencing disruptive editing after ECP expired. ––FormalDude talk 04:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Is it? I see lots of good-faith edits from IPs in the last 50 edits; i.e. [98], [99]. There are a few questionable edits in there, but I don't see anything that can't be managed by normal editing; given the high visibility and activity on the article, I'm leary to protect unless it becomes unmanageable otherwise, and I'm just not seeing it here. Jayron32 14:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhojpuri Language

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, it is unclear the batch of edits made today were actually vandalism. --Jayron32 14:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prashanth Neel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive changes by IPs/new users continue even after the edit warring user was blocked. Likely case of socking --. Ab207 (talk) 13:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 15:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: NS9280 (talk · contribs). Jayron32 15:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Berry stark (talk · contribs). extended from 1 week to indef. Jayron32 15:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Warner

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ton of vandalism today for some reason. THE Pizzaplayer!TALK TO MEE!! contribs 15:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were two vandalism edits today. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Deif

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 15:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 15:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Malaysia

Reason: Mid-level of vandalism. High-level of destructive edits. Most edits do not correlate to the topic. There is the addition of un-required images which ruins the layout of the page. Most of these images are currently under Wikimedia's speedy deletion / deletion nomination policy. Addition of a sizable amount of unsourced content. Would suggest to approve this request to prevent the need for constant maintenance in order to restore the page to readable order. PenangLion (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

28 May 2022

Balen Shah

Unprotection: Now notable as he is elected as the Mayor of the capital (Kathmandu) city of Nepal. No need to protect anymore. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 18:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Sdrqaz, the protecting admin, for their thoughts. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Muboshgu. My protection of the redirect was meant as a continuation of the previous creation protection that was extinguished by the creation of the redirect. Given that following the election it has now been overwritten by an actual article, the protection has lost its purpose. In an ideal world, I'd prefer that a draft was approved via AfC, but given that the article creator is an AfC reviewer themself, I suppose it makes zero difference. Unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dawes (band)

Reason: This page was protected over 10 years ago due to a spate of vandalism at the time. The article does not cover a generally controversial topic, and the length of the protection seems excessive. 2605:A601:AADC:2100:C2FA:4802:5984:FA49 (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Let's give it a try. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyla Rae Kowalewski

Reason: This page should be redirected to "List of The Amazing World of Gumball characters § Anais Watterson", per other cast members (such as Christian J. Simon and Duke Cutler). —ÐW-🇺🇦(T·C) 20:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional European countries

Reason: Vandalism motivated by ultranationalism and chauvinism, especially after the article was featured on Depths of Wikipedia account. Its existing content should also need to be reviewed in my opinion. White Ruthenyan (talk) 16:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is a lot of activity (and I agree the content needs improvement), but most of it is in good faith so I am reluctant to protect this now. Feel free to re-request if things get substantially worse. Malinaccier (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Jensen (Minnesota politician)

Reason: Candidate for office whose page has been almost unilaterally altered by a newly registered editor with possible WP:COI issues. Beginning to cause disruption and edit warring with other editors. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malinaccier (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Elisabeth, Duchess of Brabant

Reason: Disruptive editing by IP users. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Koko (gorilla)

Reason: Disruptive IP editing by two IP users. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Long partial-rangeblock for one user (who has been at this for over a year); the other IP self-reverted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Koshary

Reason: A very popular food. 156.174.22.208 (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page isn't vandalised enough, so your request will be probably declined. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These pages

Reason: Persistent vandalism. For the first two, edit filters wouldn't let me add the "i", but I think you know what I mean. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kamala harris

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most edits to this page have been vandalism or reversions of vandalism. Since this page is a redirect, it's unlikely that much editing will be needed. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darvin Ham

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent IP vandalism. Jack Frost (talk) 00:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of Pakistan

Reason: Continued addition of random unsourced content by multiple users not conforming to the citations provided on the article space. Sneha04 💬 14:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Assault Weapons Ban

Reason: High level of vandalism that is resulting in incorrect citations. Important in wake of the 2022 Uvalde shooting this week. Needs to accurately communicate the evidence of the cited studies, but many recent edits are resulting in the exact opposite of what the citations say. Some edits are also adding unreliable sources with inaccurate representations of the data. Needs to stay factual. Tigeropolis (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K. S. Chithra

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – It seems that the pending changes protection is not sufficient protect the article from determined persons from introducing promotional fluff into the article with registered account(s) with autoconfirmed rights. – robertsky (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sindhudesh

Reason: High level of IP Vandalisation including from the regional users which come from mostly unregistered accounts and non-verified users,
these users not only harm the information present but they further damage it, I humbly request the moderators to please increase the protection.
Thank you.
NameIsShaheer (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Cooper

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Prasad Bismil

Reason: High level of vandalism and persistent attempts to edit the page without reaching conclusion despite warnings. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 18:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morbius (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Random IPs vandalizing page. Nythar (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Assault Weapons Ban

Reason: High level of IPs making unsupported edits. Springee (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Araneta-Marcos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated premature edits to present her as First Lady of the Philippines which is not necessarily the same as the spouse of the president. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow X Together

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nythar (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 11:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wi Spa controversy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ––FormalDude talk 20:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. WP:GENSEX DS action. firefly ( t · c ) 11:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robb Elementary School shooting

Reason: Persistent vandalism. IP Addresses making dumb meme jokes. Swagging (talk) 01:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse. Persistent additions of hateful transphobic, racist misinformation too. [100] [101] Schierbecker (talk) 05:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles FC

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Repeated after reverts and multipl IPs RedPatch (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Less Unless (talk) 11:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rohitha Rajapaksa

Reason: Continued BLP violations. Page was protected twice last month too. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 13:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Chipmunkdavis

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired yesterday apparently, and surprise surprise. CMD (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hatsune Miku

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Seloloving (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still going on right now. Multiple IPs. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: They've been using multiple IPv6 addresses to try to evade blocking. Sheep (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 13:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. P.greenlink (talk) 07:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assault weapon

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Loafiewa (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shueisha

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Cow cleaner 5000 socks. $chnauzer 14:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AR-15 style rifle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Loafiewa (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German language

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tejasvi Surya

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 21:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 11:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pushyamitra Shunga

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 21:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 11:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fler

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 04:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Talking Tom

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People are repeatedly adding unencyclopaedic adjectives ("cute" and "gay") about once in 2 weeks over the past 2 months. Tube·of·Light 05:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. P.greenlink (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. P.greenlink (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Latvia

Change from extended-confirmed-protection to semi-protection: Protection is too high. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is protected as a discretionary sanction (regime: Eastern Europe and the Balkans). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Moldova, etc don't have this protection, if any. 49.180.240.221 (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant, and I suggest dropping this line of argument as it's a complete waste of time. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – per Jéské Couriano. Favonian (talk) 11:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria De Angelis

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 01:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 11:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more of the same vandalism. ZimZalaBim talk 02:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 11:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 156.174.22.208 (talk) 03:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless (talk) 11:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 Pokemon pages

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs changing the game generation without discussing on the talk page. See Talk:Pokémon_FireRed_and_LeafGreen#Game_generation. Yeeno (talk) 03:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: all three --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Channel One (Albania)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please consider semi-protecting this page due to an IP user vandalizing this page (see history). Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soundarya filmography

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of tafsir works

Reason: IP users have been vandalizing this page out of religious prejudice/fundamentalism. One IP user in February removed tafsir Ibn Abbas and the corresponding translation, blanking the section, presumably because of the disputed authorship of that tafsir. Another user edited the Ahmadi section to say they are “(non Muslim anti Islam)”. Recently, an IP user blanked the entire Ahmadi tafsir section. Zaynab1418 (talk) 08:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajesh Hamal

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fade258 (talk) 08:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs). Less Unless (talk) 13:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Delmar Burke School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been targeted for promotional and poorly-sourced content expansion for many months. There have been edits by sockpuppets (Twsabin, here), sockmasters (Factsforsure44, here), and block-evading IPs (this edit, IP in /40 range of this then-blocked user).

Previous protection has not sufficed to stem the disruption upon unprotection. 4 days, 1 month, and 2 months, have all been tried. I think there's been enough committed disruption, and a low enough need for constructive edits from newcomers, that we should try a lengthy protection period. Maybe a year or more?. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:PonyDuck21/Public Key

Reason: Non-changing information that could be malicously tampered with. Page protection for PGP keys has been given in the past e.g. User:Kjak/Public_Key. Thank you for your help. PonyDuck21 (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Ogbonna

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Democracy Index

Temporary semi-protection: there is currently an edit war going on. (And in general that article gets a lot of disruptive edits from unregistered users.) ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These pages

Change from extended-confirmed-protected to semi-protected: no need for this level of protection. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you say that? What is your rationale for protection being too high? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The page about the Australian and English cricket teams, for example, are higher than that of Australia and England themselves. The only things these cricket teams have in common are that they are all very successful and very popular cricket teams, but even the Indian and Pakistani teams only have semi-protection. 49.180.240.221 (talk) 23:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As explained above, this is irrelevant. You cannot use the status of other articles to justify whether these ones should be (un)protected. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Nonsense rationale. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Los Angeles FC

Reason: After the main page got protected a newly created user (probably the same as the IP) is now vandalizing the talk page as well as the LAFC redirect page (it's a fan of the rival LA Galaxy team) RedPatch (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie McNutt death video case

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Almost no edits since the page was created have been something other than vandalism or reverting it. One edit even got oversighted. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 17:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Florence Pugh

Reason: Persistent unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 17:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These pages

Change from extended-confirmed-protected to semi-protected: no need for this level of protection. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

El C protected them both under WP:ARBBLP reasoning. I imagine there is a need for that level of protection, but El C knows better than I do. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Dark Emu is quite a controversial book here in Australia, often cited as a "fake history book" by many politicians and the author of Dark Emu is Bruce Pascoe. However, the level of protection for the book is higher than that of Australia, the country it was made in. 58.105.161.125 (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which is completely irrelevant. The status of other (tangentially-related) pages does not affect whether or not a page should be protected, doubly so if there is a discretionary sanctions regime involved. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Acquaint yourself with Wikipedia:Protection policy instead of trying to make up your own. Favonian (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I happen to be the one who downgraded Unites States (I've heard of it) from ECP to semi... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ El_C 15:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paresh Baruah

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent vandalism by IP user - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 06:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lysenkoism

Reason: High level of IP edit warring with multiple editors and not following WP:BRD process. About 7 reverts in 2 days so far. Ramos1990 (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pound sterling

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent wp:ADVOCACY by IP editor who has not engaged at talk page (despite having opened a discussion). Multiple attempts to push a POV that contradict the citations. Latest edit sought to respecify ISO 4217!

Cautionary note to adminstrator: this could have been interpreted as a content dispute but I suggest that it has gone beyond that now, given that the IP editor is trying to insert complete fiction in "support" of their POV. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Georges Méliès

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The helper5667 (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Airtransat236

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also getting harassment from IPs. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 19:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thibaut Courtois

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding vandalism after the final of the Champions League. Kante4 (talk) 21:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

29 May 2022

Kirby: Right Back at Ya!

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced material by IP users. ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 19:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

St. Louis Blues

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism started again after previous protection ended. Deadman137 (talk) 00:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hermione Granger-Weasley

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized a few times by an LTA who has targeted other redirects to Hermione Granger. It's unlikely this page will need to be edited much as it is a redirect. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermione Granger poster.jpg

Indefinite semi-protection: This page has been targeted by an LTA who has been vandalizing Hermione-related pages for nearly a year. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Granger (Harry Potter)

Semi-protection: This page has been targeted by an LTA who has vandalized other redirects to Hermione Granger. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hermione Jane Granger - Harry Potter

Semi protection: This page has been targeted by an LTA who has vandalized other redirects to Hermione Granger. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iel (pronoun)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs trying to put unsourced statements. — Tazuco 22:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Tate

Reason: Didn't take long....10 hours after template removed? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protection from vandalism

Reason: There is high level of IP vandalism 2409:4054:2010:1FDF:55BE:86C0:7518:98DC (talk) 04:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got the right page? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. No such page and no response. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And not even a prior edit history to trace their steps and know what page they could be coming from CreecregofLife (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

International School Ho Chi Minh City - American Academy

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – First calling it the KKK. Unsourced claim of violence. This. "Irresponsible Violent School". etc. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 07:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pāua

Reason: Various IP addresses are vandalizing this, they all seem to be the same person · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sindhudesh

Reason: Hello kind moderator, this is my 2nd time asking to increase the security of the article
and this is due to frequent IP vandalizations that happen there which disrupt the information present,
i would kindly ask to increase the security of the page preventing
non-login users from editing this is to prevent edit conflicts which are already present in the article, give protection to the page for atleast 3 months.
Now i will go, thank you for reviewing.
NameIsShaheer 10:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makonnen Wolde Mikael

Reason: Content conflict over the persons ancestry, potentially controversial addition by a user, in which IP's are responding. Talkpage is bypassed by everyone, user and ip's alike. Temporary extended protection is needed. YonasJH (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ribbon of Saint George

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing whitewashing by various IP’s. Kleuske (talk) 06:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of members of the 17th Lok Sabha

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by IPs going on for many weeks. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Ovsyannikova

Reason: An IP hopper replaces Odessa with Odesa against consensus; five reverts today already. Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Double or Nothing (2022)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Justificate (talk) 01:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to be over, apologies for not reacting on time Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maxwell Jacob Friedman

Reason: Persistent unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 13:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example Article Name

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because erling haaland has just made a transfer to Manchester city hence the page permission to be modified Beckrianzy (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Beckrianzy. If this is about Erling Haaland, please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page (note that he doesn’t actually join Manchester City until 1 July). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 08:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

HanArchive (talk) 19:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@HanArchive: Which article are you referring to and what changes do you request? Favonian (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – for lack of information. Favonian (talk) 07:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Flair

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP users change her real name without providing reliable BLP sources. Recent unsourced changes due to her marriage. Mann Mann (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Fatagar

Reason: New user keeps reverting to their preferred version ignoring BRD Magherbin (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pat King (activist)

Reason: Regular vandalism by IP and mobile phone account. I've asked before, it's expired, as soon as it expires, more comes in. I think this will remain a theme for this page due to the political nature of the content, so if this could be longer than the usual month, it will save me repeating this processs monthly please. CT55555 (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeet filmography

Reason: Stop Spreading of wrong information Thenfsa (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Ball

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CityLife Church

Reason: consistent removal of unflattering and controversial past statements by affiliated entities 180.150.60.131 (talk) 07:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kajol

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Fade258 (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ponniyin Selvan: I

Reason: Unsourced Edits by IP users. Give protection for at least 3 months. Laxman.1908 (talk) 10:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azov Battalion

"change is a neo-Nazi unit to is a nationalist unit" Lisachloe (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Same reply as for your many previous attempts: make a coherent request on Talk:Azov Battalion. Favonian (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian Party (United States)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 01:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 71.230.191.242 for 2 weeks. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Road signs in Malaysia

Reason: Multiple unlogged in IP users from the same ISP and area are doing disruptive edits on this article. They are reinstating old PNG images and removing the descriptions when there is newer SVG images that follow a new sign format and a lot more high resolution.

This content dispute is addressed in the talk page to discuss, but since these users are making mobile, visual edits it is most likely they will never reply.

Currently I think this is the only way other than banning the IPs but they will just return with a new IP address like they did before. Thank you. ItsTomato (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 114.122.128.0/18 has been blocked from editing this article for 3 months. Favonian (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cupcakke

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 18:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Adli

Reason: Avoiding unnecessarily editing Amfiq92 (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the instructions at the top of this page. "Unnecessarily editing" is not a protection criteria. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA

156.174.22.208 (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1917 (2019 film)

Reason: Protection exists because of 1 IP edit warrior over a year ago. I doubt this film is a active target for vandals nowadays SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping Primefac. It looks like 79.53.128.0/17, home to the editor whose antics caused the protection, is still active, and some of the edits are – disconcerting. Favonian (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not super-inclined - I count a half-dozen IPs, in which every edit from January 2021 has been redacted or suppressed. My protection was not a one-off, it was due to escalating protections previously. If someone wants to overrule me I will not stand in their way, I agree with Favonian's disconcert. Primefac (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – For the record, the protection was caused by BLP violations, not just edit-warring. Someone has a very unhealthy focus on one of the actors in this film, and as the above mentioned IP range still produces a number of unhinged edits, I'm coming down on the side of caution. Favonian (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frenkie de Jong

Reason: High level of IP vandalism with unproven changes. Ultraprime12345 (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:TikTok logo.svg

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonteemil (talk) 21:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. File talk pages are rarely edited, the last (and only) constructive edit by an IP here was two years ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bennedict Mathurin

The Bennedict Mathurin needs to mention his 3/21/22 groping allegations. This was caught on video, widely discussed in the media, and reported by credibly outlets. An administrator, Drmies, and other users seem to be trying to suppress any mention of this incident. Truth Possum (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please see the recent history of that article: these I consider to be BLP violations considering the size of the edit and the paucity of the sourcing; the user is welcome to make their case on the talk page but hasn't seen fit to do so. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • How is ESPN not a valid source? Making this briefer doesn't allow for any mention of Mathurin's denial of the allegations. Because of the sensitivity of these allegations, the more in-depth discussion feels necessary. Do you have any suggestions that don't result in completely suppressing the matter altogether? Truth Possum (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sheesh. Yes. DISCUSS IT ON THE TALK PAGE AND LOOK FOR CONSENSUS. And don't twist my rationale into "ESPN is unreliable"--that's disingenuous. As far as I'm concerned, that content is so undue that the admin who looks at this might well consider rev-deleting. Drmies (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        Please clarify: "that content is so undue"?
        Will a shorter version of this story citing ESPN meet your standards then? Truth Possum (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Wrong venue. There are now discussions at Talk:Bennedict Mathurin as well as WP:BLPN. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

30 May 2022

Jesus

Indefinite or temporary for a long time, extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite semi protection, unwanted edits keep coming, so this needs to be protected more. This page is simply very susceptible to vandalism. Drummingman (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I see exactly two disruptive edits in the last week which would have been prevented by upping the protection level to EC. I also see edits by useful contributors in the last few weeks which would have been prevented by the change in protection level. I also see some content disputes but on a high-visibility page like this one that's a healthy state. This is currently semi-protected indefinitely, which is just about as far as I'm willing to go, this being the encyclopedia anyone can edit. BusterD (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uttarakhand

Reason: Please Permanent Protection this article because some people vandisam TheManishPanwar (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm seeing nothing inappropriate since the 24th... BusterD (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seo Shin-ae

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 23:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hambirrao Mohite

Reason: High level of consistent IP vandalism on this page. Page was protected earlier for a week but after expiration, article has been constantly disrupted. Need page protected with access to confirmed users only. MehmoodS (talk) 19:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aspartame

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding the usual badly sourced and debunked claims and not discussing in talk. Unbh (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:6C5D:5900:277:D5D5:BBE2:40D2:2E42 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FC Bayern Munich

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.37.105.244 (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Already pending changes protected and last edit two days ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Carey

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip's keep removing sourced content. RF23 (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Content dispute. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Khan

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because of a significantly lower rate of possible vandalism on the page due to recent occurrences.. . Ultraprime12345 (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those recent occurrences being the article being ECP protected (2022/04/09). Given BLP is the reason the protection was escalated in the first place.... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The article is currently restricted to registered users with at least 30 days tenure and more than 500 edits due to persistent violations of the biographies of living persons policy from (auto)confirmed accounts. Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page instead. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gamergate (harassment campaign)

I’m not sure if “right wing” is explicitly correct in it’s entirety, and seems a little oddly biased in its writing. I’d prefer changing “right wing” to “misogynistic” or “anti-feminist”, as ‘right-wing’ is kind of vague nowadays, with the term being used inconsistently to describe certain groups that can or have been perceived as on the political right in many a few cases. It just doesn’t sound very precise in my opinion. MaxOS117 (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Compañero y Compañera

Reason: Persistent vandalism from an IP user which has been going on for months. TheHotwiki (talk) 16:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The user has been /19 rangeblocked from the article for one year by Ohnoitsjamie. Let’s see how that goes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jollof rice

Reason: Anonymous users repeatedly remove or alter sourced content. FromSenegal (talk) 22:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The content you keep adding is not sourced properly; the source you're adding is concerned with a different dish. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know it´s a different dish since I know this dish and it´s background and you don´t? FromSenegal (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History wars

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unreferenced details added; edit warring; article ownership. Migsmigss (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 UEFA Champions League Final

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 ☎ 21:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

F3 (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs/new users to BO figures and critical reception. Ab207 (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kishmish

Reason: High level of IP vendalism Thenfsa (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meena Jutla

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous users continue to add validly removed information and are not liaising with other editors. I am reporting this now since I do not want to create or engage in an edit war. Blanchey (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:CEE Spring 2022

Reason: Semiprotection requested as a lot of new accounts appear to have been spamming frequently these past few days. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Top Gun

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism since Top Gun:Maverick release. BilCat (talk) 20:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. MelanieN (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diet coke

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Redirect target repeatedly changed to Codename: Kids Next Door. Painting17 (talk) 01:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 04:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Humane Columbia

Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting 1 month until elections are over. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Pact for Colombia

Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting 1 month until elections are over. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Team for Colombia

Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting 1 month until elections are over. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elections in Peru

Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting 1 month until elections are over. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bimal Acharya

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 02:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stems

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is going way beyond "test edits". Lithopsian (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also took the opportunity to clean out the vandalism from the history. And blocked the perpetrator. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:PAVLOV

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some trolls are insulting me terribly. PAVLOV (talk) 10:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flavio Briatore

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked by Inter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hello, World!" program

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. PRAXIDICAE💕 11:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justine Skye

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from a bunch of IPs and new accounts. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 12:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cypriot Greek

Reason: I am requesting semi-protection due to persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Demetrios1993 (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fraser Forster

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Storchy (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Galileo Galilei

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 73.22.122.66 (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Armenia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Attracting sock disruption. CMD (talk) 09:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imee Marcos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spike in IP vandalism attempting to remove cited content in the article. The vandalisms are centered around attempts to whitewash the history of this "Imee Marcos" as well as that of their family. Firekiino (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michelin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps changing European English for a European company into American English, Coming close to an editwar. The Banner talk 11:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Human evolution

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 12:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wretchskull: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last edit was over a month ago ... Sdrqaz (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Mignogna

Reason: High level of IP and fresh account vandalism, violating NPOV. It continues to persist from his highly vocal fanbase even three years after his perpetrated sexual assaults came to light CreecregofLife (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems it’s been set for three, which I think is still good. I wouldn’t consider it excessive CreecregofLife (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Euro 2020 Final

Reason: Repeated removal of sourced content by anonymous user, who has shown no inclination to discuss the changes – PeeJay 13:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Valjean/Essay/Reliable sources, Trump, and his editors here

Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection for my private essay. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ekeshwar

Reason: To prevent vandalism Sarojbisht11 (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

East Timor

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting sock attention. CMD (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of pizza

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing content dispute; someone keeps using Wikipedia as a source with different IPs. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Actually, it was unsourced edits and now revdel'd personal atacks. And block evasion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iñaki Rueda

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. DH85868993 (talk) 10:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked a /22 range, disruption across a number of racing articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kalash people

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing sourced content claiming them to be 'Zionist sources' in the edit summary [102] [103]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was a similar removal before [104] by a newbie user, possibly per certain POV. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Father of the Nation

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attacked by LTA:Nipponese Dog Calvero. PAVLOV (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of current world boxing champions

Reason: Persistent vandalism by an IP hopper. Individual is removing weights and champions from the list (because they can't get their own way). – 2.O.Boxing 09:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nadoda Rajputs

High chances of vandalism and caste issues: High level of IP vandalism. Jadeja97 (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Besides, it would prevent you from editing the article until your account becomes autoconfirmed, a couple of days from now. Favonian (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua (name)

Reason: Vandalism by an IP user and newly registered user. Keep changing Joshua to a female name. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

31 May 2022

User:Nedim Ardoğa

Indefinite full protection: WP:RIP. Eyesnore 21:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected TonyBallioni (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Jaiswal

Reason: please allow me to edit Neerajsinghdirector9372 (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Did you read why the page was deleted and protected? It all seemed pretty reasonable to me CreecregofLife (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He's probably trying to bypass the draft review. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. @Neerajsinghdirector9372: There is a draft for this article at Draft:Ajay Jaiswal. You may edit it there. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Testicles

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Reduce to semi-protection. This article was fully protected 11 years ago and is fully protected. I believe that an article with such a name should only be semi protected, like Testicle which is only semi-protected. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 19:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What edits do you want to make to this redirect, Capsulecap? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
None. Is there an "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" kind of policy with page protection? Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 21:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined it's not been vandalized likely because it is protected, unlike the target this one has significantly less watchers (over 100 times less) so vandalism would be less likely to be noticed as well, and it has hundreds of inbound links. If this is in the way of any needed maintenance that can't be handled with an edit request, we can revisit. — xaosflux Talk 22:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Étoile Charleville-Mézières

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism occurring recently. Raltoid (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WVNS-TV

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Raines

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP address with an obvious grudge is trying to remove all reference to the subject's PhD. I've put them on final warning but I think that a period of page protection might also help. DanielRigal (talk) 23:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Cruel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know why but it seems to be getting attention from a number of IP vandals recently. I assume the case has been in the press somewhere!. JeffUK (talk) 23:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Skinnyfromthe9

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the past day. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User WPBiography/doc

Reason: Template:User WPBiography is protected now, so they've started vandalizing the doc page instead. Sumanuil. 03:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi

Reason: Perstitent removal of referenced content from the infobox. Since 15 May, a number of IPs have attempted to remove an alternate birth place and birth dates from the article, even though these are referenced both in the infobox and the article's main text. Applodion (talk) 08:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Kennedy

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • User(s) blocked. Good catch; rangeblocked a user who has been targeting a number of articles over the last year in a similar fashion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikaw sa Puso Ko

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits and unconstructive edit summaries from an IP user. TheHotwiki (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Skinnyfromthe9

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism (mainly focussed on the word 'snitch') due to recent news headlines. Mxtt.prior (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Shah

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Shah

Reason: vandalism 73.22.122.66 (talk) 12:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Levantine Arabic

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism. Nehme1499 12:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Hog Farm. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persuasion

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent copyright violations by a series of editors (likely block evasion, at least one has an indef block). MrOllie (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chisholm Catholic College, Perth

Reason: Vandalism 73.22.122.66 (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of UEFA Champions League finals

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 05:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Pacific typhoon season

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and unsourced edits occurring after recent protection. Akbermamps 07:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Owl House characters

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism consisting of one of the listed characters (named "the Collector") being changed to a fake name ("Enzo Gabriel") with no basis in the show. The fake name is instead a joke originating from a segment of the show's fandom. The vandalizing edits have occurred 5 times in the past 2 days, and have come from multiple anonymous/unconfirmed users. Jamie Eilat (talk) 12:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renan Lodi

Reason: Vandalism 73.22.122.66 (talk) 12:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Q28

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been destructive behavior, so I want this page to be semi-protected . Q28 (talk) 11:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: As per the discussion on the offending user's talk page, and the post to your talk page, this was clearly not vandalism. They simply posted by mistake to your user page and then reverted. And then posted a non vandalistic message to your talk. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Italians

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Multiple IP accounts of the same person are doing an Edit War making a non-Civil POV pushing ignoring the sources in the "Ethnogenesis" section. I will open a discussion thread to avoid possible future Edit Wars on the subject. I suggest a partial protection of the article.Venezia Friulano (talk) 12:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: content dispute. Please discuss changes on article talk page.. Please make WP:EDITREQUESTs and/or seek dispute resolution as needed. " All content must be cited from reliable, independent sources with a reputation for fact checking." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles

Los Angeles has a significant number of homeless people, one of the highest in the United States. LA’s homeless encampments are notorious for addiction, drug dealing, gang banging, and stabbings. 68.133.47.161 (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Please discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page at Talk:Los Angeles. Use the {{Edit semi-protected}} template to request a specific edit. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Defense

Reason: IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Favonian (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Kool Herc

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP range 207.195.80.0 is persistently vandalizing. Recommend semi-protection and a rangeblock. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – Specifically, 207.195.80.0/24 for 3 months. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia in the Eurovision Song Contest

Temporary semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry by Dealer07. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 16:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ringette

Reason: High level of recent vandalism, mass edits, due to a single editor (insulting as well, not for my contributions but ones belonging to others). Seemed in good faith initially, investigation strongly suggests otherwise; WP:POINT, loss of many many sources due to the same editor; too much content lost to effectively use undo/reverts to repair significant losses CheckersBoard (talk) 22:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a WP:OWN issue here. You have been reverting a number of good-faith edits which do seem to be making the article better by removing a lot of original research and off-topic waffle. Calling them 'Vandalism' is not appropriate. JeffUK (talk) 23:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute between established users, currently at the point where the nom has been blocked from editing the article. Favonian (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Hatchling

Reason: The pageant for Queen Elizabeth's diamond jubilee will take place in London, England, on 5 June 2022. The Hatchling will lead the pageant (celebratory procession) down the Mall and past Buckingham Palace, and the Gold State Coach pulled by around eight white horses will be included in the pageant. This is the coronation coach, and it has not been included in a procession for 20 years, so it will attract worldwide attention. The Hatchling is like no other giant puppet, being also a kite, and having an extraordinary appearance. It is expected to attract extra attention by its unexpected entertainment activities while leading the pageant. Thus both will attract unusual worldwide attention. I am requesting page protection for these two articles for all of 5 June, and if necessary for the following day. I am requesting protection at least at DYK level, or higher at your discretion. If you can't do that, then the absolute minimum protection would have to be: no unregistered editors, no brand new just-registered editors. Storye book (talk) 09:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question: In that case, for the reasons given above, would it be possible for me to ask someone with the facility to protect a page, to add these two pages (The Hatchling and Gold State Coach) to their watchlist on 5 June? Storye book (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gold State Coach

Reason: Same request as for The Hatchling. Storye book (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 14:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:lol1VNIO

Could someone please remove the bullet point "What on a switch?" and the two images that follow it as an obvious violation of WP:BLP, WP:POLEMIC and WP:ATTACK. It is unacceptable for editors to be using the elf on the shelf meme (see https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/youve-heard-of-the-elf-on-the-shelf if you're unfamiliar) to label living people they don't like as a b****es. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lol1VNIO: Can you justify your user page and the following text: "PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE without my permission. No exceptions." In case you didn't know, your user page is not yours. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@192.76.8.78: When I put that there, I wanted it to say snitch (as in thief). I didn't even notice that rhymes with the b-word at the time. If the word is still problematic, then I'll remove it.
Per WP:NOBAN, if I request people not to edit my user page, it should, within reason, be respected. My reason is it looks cool when the dates in the page history subtract and months add, even if it makes me a man child. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 10:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My OCD like it when something looks good like that. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 10:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@192.76.8.78: I don’t see that you’ve raised this on Lol1VNIO's talk page. That should be your first port of call. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – This is not the right venue for settling matters of etiquette. Favonian (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Orbán

Change "The article also mentioned also mentions the sudden increase in wealth of Orbán's childhood friend, Lőrinc Mészáros, thanks to winning state contracts.[186]" to "The article also noted the sudden increase in wealth of Orbán's childhood friend, Lőrinc Mészáros, thanks to winning state contracts.[186]" Mlevinmail (talk) 14:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2022/05&oldid=1183264674"