Crystal Clear app clock.svgIt is approximately 8:24 PM where this user lives.

The Signpost: 28 December 2020Edit

"Upcoming Ariana Grande album" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Upcoming Ariana Grande album. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Upcoming Ariana Grande album until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Harajuku Girls (song)Edit

Hi, Heartfox. An AfD discussion for Harajuku Girls (song) has started. Please feel free to comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The Masked SingerEdit

Hey, I am terribly sorry for the unsuccessful FAC. I feel really bad because I put a placeholder and then failed to comment... at all. The prose is brilliant, but I understand that source reviewers can sometimes be confusing. That said, I wholeheartedly appreciate your efforts in constructing a comprehensive article for the betterment of this site, and the general public's interest. Fyi, my first successful FAC was 7 years after my first edit, so don't be dissuaded. Your first FAC was really neat and clean, as opposed to my monstrous first (several) attempts. You are handling the situation very well (I remember being very mad at those who opposed to my FACs..), so keep up the great work. (talk) 16:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@: Thank you for your very kind words. I understand where the source review is coming from, but I just felt some of it was a bit excessive considering the content being cited from the sources, and I just felt kind of defeated at that point and didn't really feel like continuing justifying certain things even though I probably could have. I have removed some stuff since then even though it kind of makes the article worse but I am proud that such a comprehensive article is available to people for a popular TV show, especially when there are so few good/featured reality show articles. I think I will probably not renominate until the series ends, which is probably in a couple years, but that will probably change. I start my second term of my first year of university next week, so I will be (hopefully able to make myself) more inactive until the summer to focus on school :) Thanks, Heartfox (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
I understand. I hope you find the balance between Wikipedia and real life, because I can occasionally get very compulsive lol. Good luck with your studies! (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
For the tremendous effort of putting together a holistic collection of Nielsen ratings. It's quite the undertaking, and your efforts are very appreciated ! Rswallis10 (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks again; I hope general readers can better understand the success of shows now and other editors can easily find info as well :) Heartfox (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Live-InEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Live-In you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


  Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Live-In, has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on January 16, 2021.  Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of some birds. Enjoy!
Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 20:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Heartfox (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Live-InEdit

The article Live-In you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Live-In for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

IJBall and RowspansEdit

Hi I'm just wondering if you ever resolved the issue with rowspans on Olivia Rodrigo's page? I agree with you 100% that a rowspan is needed and that IJBall's reasoning for reverting edits are only based on his personal opinion. Not sure how to move forward with this... D_bovair1988 (talk) 20:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@D bovair1988: You can leave a message with your opinion on the talk page; don't come to me first lol I'm not going to have a secret convo off to the side. Best wishes, Heartfox (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok sorry to bother you

Your draft article, Draft:List of The Masked Singer (American TV series) contestantsEdit


Hello, Heartfox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of The Masked Singer (American TV series) contestants".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for deletionEdit

Hello, Heartfox,

Just a reminder that every time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you should post a notice about this tagging on the talk page of the page creator. I was just looking at Ben Arogundade and it wasn't done in this case. It is very easy if you use Twinkle, once you set up your Preferences, the program will inform the page creator automatically. This should be done out of habit, even if it appears that the editor is no longer active. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks; I think I checked that the page creator wasn't active for many years so I didn't leave a message, but I should have done that. I don't engage in deletion stuff regularly so I didn't know. PROD only says you should, not that you must, so given they weren't active for many years I didn't bother. Heartfox (talk) 02:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit on Motherhood (ER)Edit

Hey, I just saw your edit on Motherhood (ER) and I thought it was really helpful. However, I was just wondering if you knew a website where an archive of the USA Today page you cited could be found just to verify the information. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 23:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

@Some Dude From North Carolina: if you have ProQuest (it's free through The Wikipedia Library, you don't even need an institutional account), you can get viewership for everything from July 25, 1988, through March 17, 1991, on "USA Today pre-1997 Fulltext" (you can find some direct links at User:Heartfox/sandbox/Nielsen, which I'm working on). After that date, you have to use the links from the articles at tvaholics, and then type them into the Wayback Machine as they are no longer live. They're also copyright violations so you can't use them in references, etc. or link to them directly on Wiki because of WP:COPYLINK. The links were live until about September 2020, but were probably taken down due to the fact they're copyvios. The vast majority are at the Wayback Machine. Most are just clipouts with no article titles, etc. but USA Today published them every Wednesday on page 3D unless it was Christmas or something. For example, the week from August 3 to August 9, 1992, would be published on Wednesday, August 12, on page 3D. Beginning in mid-1996, you can find viewership through links at my sandbox, and I also added a table to Wikipedia:List of U.S. television ratings archives for the whole of 1997, which is complete. If you have any other questions/need help I'd happy happy to answer. Heartfox (talk) 23:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the detailed info!   Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 00:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021Edit

FAC: Love for Sale (Bilal album)Edit

Hi. Would you be willing to offer a review for my nomination of this article? As you might see, sourcing has been raised as an issue, so perhaps you can offer more thoughts on the remaining sources suggesting attention. Here is the guideline on source reviewing and quality for FAC, if you choose to do so. Thanks. isento (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Valentine Greets!!!Edit

  Valentine Greets!!!

Hello Heartfox, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,

D💘ggy54321 (xoxo😘) 04:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

AFDs (February 2021)Edit

Hi, Heartfox. Two AFDs discussion have started for The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) and I've Just Begun (Having My Fun). Please comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, (talk) 04:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Live-In FACEdit

Hello again. I just wanted to say that I'm sorry for not participating in the above FAC. I am always happy to see a FAC on an obscure television show as that is one of my personal Wikipedia passion projects. Something about working on these one-season obscurities is so interesting to me as it reflects a lot about television and consumer interest at the time. Anyway, just wanted to let you know that you can reach out to me whenever if you need a review for something. Aoba47 (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I was kind of inspired by your work and decided to try one on my own. Unfortunately I chose a show so obscure even TV Guide didn't have all of the episodes listed lol. It's not gonna be an FA but I guess it was a good quick writing experience and I had fun watching the episodes (sort of... I can see how it failed lol) so it's okay. I will definitely reach out in the future; your input is valued anywhere! Thanks, Heartfox (talk) 21:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • I know this will sound terribly cliché, but the most important thing is if you had fun working on the article and everything related to it. I am glad that you enjoyed it, and I think you did a wonderful job with the article. Aoba47 (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021Edit

Nomination of Feel the Love (Kids See Ghosts song) for deletionEdit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feel the Love (Kids See Ghosts song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

  • If I want to participate in a deletion process then I will. Having participated in a whopping 20 over 6 years, you can see how much I love spending time doing so...
You don't have to spam everyone's talk page—the AfD sorting list is readily accessible. The Ultimate Boss, I think you will enjoy your time more if you focused on improving articles and honing your skills rather than nominating articles for deletion. People may forget/forgive the drama you've associated yourself with if you lay low for a bit. I don't know if this nomination is because you genuinely feel it should be deleted, or out of spite against another editor, or maybe you're having a rough time again. I can't tell, and so I don't want to involve myself in something possibly malicious. You and Kyle Peake seem to be going back and forth nominating each other's articles for deletion, and I don't want to involve what little time I have in that.
Regardless, having been active in some of those discussions for a good week it's kind of clear to me that a lot of people don't really care about the guidelines, and they are contradictory and confusing, so I really do not know what base a vote on anymore. Therefore, I am no longer participating in such processes unless something in which I am a major contributor gets nominated. Thank you, Heartfox (talk) 01:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of One of the Boys (1989 TV series)Edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article One of the Boys (1989 TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

One of the Boys (1989 TV series)Edit

  Congrats dude! The article you were working on, One of the Boys (1989 TV series), has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on March 12, 2021.  Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of a frog. Enjoy!
Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! Heartfox (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of One of the Boys (1989 TV series)Edit

The article One of the Boys (1989 TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:One of the Boys (1989 TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Golden GlobesEdit

Thank you for the newspaper sources in the Ratings list in the Golden Globe Awards article. I am using them to edit IMDb listings. I was wondering if you might have a good source to show that the Globes were not aired anywhere on TV from 1969 to 1972. Brndtnlsn (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@Brndtnlsn: I think I do have the sources but I was too lazy to add them when I originally made the table. Just as an example, this clipping shows that it did not air on television in 1969. But do be careful as the ones on KTTV aired really late and it's Pacific Time, so the air dates in the table are adjusted because it would be like 2 am Eastern. Heartfox (talk) 21:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I noticed you added a reference to a Variety article, but I can't access it. If you could possibly post here a copy or relevant quote from that article, that would help me. Brndtnlsn (talk) 07:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
@Brndtnlsn: which footnote? Heartfox (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
December 6, 1972, Variety article says "Hollywood Foreign Press Assn.'s Golden Globes awards, off tv since 1968 when they encountered sharp criticism from the FCC..." Heartfox (talk) 07:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, that's what I was hoping for. Brndtnlsn (talk) 09:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021Edit


Hey! I saw this and wanted to clarify something for you. I got a notification that an editor reverted my edit to Justice (Justin Bieber album), I read their edit summary (which was basically the same as mine and which linked to Template:Infobox song#released), I read the section, which made no mention that it was put in place 14 years ago, and I thought "hey, Taylor Swift released a bunch of songs solely to radio in promotion of Folklore and Evermore, and since this says to list the dates of singles that were only sent to radio as the day they were released from the album, I should change that". As well, most of the policies on Wikipedia were put in place more than a decade ago, so I don't see why you’re using all caps and telling me to revert when you don’t do that for anything else that was discussed in pre-2008 Wikipedia. Yes, Infobox instructions are not the MoS, but unless you can find something in the MoS that contradicts what is being said in the template doc, why are you even bringing it up? Lastly, what does I'm a bit tired of your unduly deference to instructions, whether they're relevant or not mean? When do I defer from instructions so unduly that you get tired from it? Please clarify. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 22:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Well, I believe they are wrong. The infobox template refers to "album tracks". For example, if there was a song that received unofficial airplay (no impact date), and it had an article, then it would use the album release date. But since we are in the streaming era, and most editors have agreed that radio impact dates = single, why would it still be an "album track"? An album track is something that isn't released independently. You are correct for "Peaches"! Why is the music video date being used? That is not a release of the song, it's marketing of the song. I think you are a good editor; I just think sometimes you tend to follow whatever another person says, whether they are right or not. Referring to singles by their album date is something that I have never seen before, and I was a bit mystified as to why this was happening. No hard feelings, Heartfox (talk) 22:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Moving forward, maybe I should take a step back, take a breather, go on a walk, etc, and try to form my own analysis on what stuff means, rather than me believing anything I’m told. As for right now, I’ve already put this into place, and I have come to the conclusion that I’m very confused on the wording, and that the documentation needs to be rewritten with a mindset of "We're in 2021, we're in the streaming era, how has this differed from 2007?". I half agree with your argument, and I half agree with AshMusique's original summary, who I’m pinging so they can offer their two cents. Likewise, no hard feelings   D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 23:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
@Doggy54321: it's not your fault. There are many guidelines, etc. that no longer reflect how things are today. I, too, get confused sometimes and wish there was more clarity regarding stuff. Regarding the issue here, I just think it would be unhelpful for readers, for example, if there were 10 singles from an album that were only released to radio, and they all had the same dates in the infobox. That just doesn't make sense to me or seem like it would benefit readers. Like, why bother writing a date at that point (maybe we don't and just leave it to prose, who knows)? Heartfox (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree with that. Leaving it to prose might be a good option, but at that point, why even list the singles in the Infobox? D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 00:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
I think it might be beneficial to start a discussion at a WikiProject for clarity regarding the infobox template wording. Heartfox (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
I concur. You should start it, as you’re the one who can say more about it. I’m honestly just confused on the wording. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 00:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Source reviewEdit

I will address everything after you indicate the source review has been completed, as I don't want to keep bothering you with pings and clouding up the nomination page with recurring notes of thanks. Please indicate it explicitly when done. I do understand if you regret taking on the source review of such a lengthy article, though. It sounds tedious! Regards.--NØ 01:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: It will pass when you address the comment regarding fn 128. I don't regret anything? It just takes a few times looking over things to notice issues sometimes. Heartfox (talk) 02:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Re: this, I apologize if my acknowledgement of the SR concluding came across as disrespectful. You have been leaving spurts of one or two comments for the past several days, so I think it is a reasonable assumption that you are busy. I did not want to be annoying and ping you for the hundredth time. Needless to say, I am grateful you have performed two source reviews for me and I owe you one.--NØ 06:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
@MaranoFan: Great work on the article, and you can ping me whenever idc. Heartfox (talk) 06:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Create an article for a personEdit

Hello, Yassin Bilal, music producer and music maker. I want an article in Wikipedia about my name and my work. Can you help me with that? Peace.maker14 (talk) 04:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Veronica Clare peer reviewEdit

Hello again. Apologies for the message, but I remember that you mentioned possibly helping me with my current peer review for the Veronica Clare article and I was curious if you were still able to help. It seems like the peer review process was slowly becoming active, but it seems (at least to me) to have slipped back into its old state of dormancy. If you no longer have the time to do it, I completely understand. I just wanted to check in about this. I hope you have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

@Aoba47: sorry I forgot!! I will leave some comments today. Heartfox (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021Edit

A requestEdit

Hello, apologies for the random message. I have come across your comments in various FA nominations and was wondering if you'd be willing to leave some feedback here. The article became a GA in January and I wish to take to FA but would like to get as much feedback on how to improve it further. I'd really appreciate your comments. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the request, Ashleyyoursmile. I will take a look when there are no other unaddressed comments (when HumanxAnthro is done). Heartfox (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the consideration. Ashleyyoursmile! 03:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

In appreciationEdit

  The Reviewers Award
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Gog the Mild. I admire your dedication to the process and I can't imagine the time you must spend doing everything! Heartfox (talk) 23:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of One of the Boys (1989 TV series)Edit

 Congratulations, Heartfox! The article you nominated, One of the Boys (1989 TV series), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Big congrats on getting this to FA! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Congrats on getting the article promoted to a FA. You put a lot of work in it and you did a great job with handling the comments from the FAC to further improve the article. Apologies for the delay in my congratulations. I just noticed the promotion today. Aoba47 (talk) 02:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


  The Featured Article Medal
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 13:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Heartfox (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/The 40-Year-Old Virgin/archive1Edit

If you could by some chance leave input for the peer review linked above, then I'd very much appreciate that. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Will leave comments soon. Heartfox (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Katie JoplinEdit

Hello again! I hope you are doing well and having a good week so far. Apologies for this random message. I was wondering if you could help me find the ratings for Katie Joplin? I completely understand if you say no. I was thinking about nominating the article for a FAC, but I am feeling insecure lately about FACs for some reason (and especially since this show is super obscure lol). Either way, have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 02:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aoba47: I found the numbers for you :) If you want me to add them for any other articles please let me know and I'd be happy to add them. Don't worry about the FAC chances. As long as the air dates/titles can be sourced then I believe any obscure TV show can be an FAC. It's just about finding coverage that is not freely accessible online. Heartfox (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the message. I am still learning how to best use and navigate ProQuest. For some reason, I had completely missed those ratings so thank you for finding them. I completely agree with you that any article should be eligible to become a featured article at some point (as long as the work is done for it of course). Best of luck with everything on and off Wikipedia. Aoba47 (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • @Aoba47: I just used THR because I had already indexed all of the available weeks for 1999 on User:Heartfox/sandbox/Nielsen#1999. I'm using ProQuest through my university where you get more sources than you do through The Wikipedia Library, so that may be why you couldn't find them, although there are other sources for household ratings through ProQuest via TWL. Heartfox (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • That makes sense to me. Thank you for letting me know. I did not think about how university access and the Wikipedia Library access would differ. I greatly appreciate how you are pulling together these different sources for ratings as it is very important to include in television show articles. It is very helpful for Wikipedia as a whole. Aoba47 (talk) 19:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you again for adding the ratings to the articles. Aoba47 (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Kids See GhostsEdit

I have not finished going over all of your comments yet but have covered a good number of them, so could you try and respond soon in these areas? --K. Peake 06:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

In case you are wondering why I posted this when it's not all been fully addressed yet, there are quite a few questions I have about your comments for the candidacy. --K. Peake 20:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
All of the sources have been addressed properly by me now... I wonder why you've not commented since you've clearly been active no offence. --K. Peake 07:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
What happened yesterday, as you said you'd leave comments Sunday but never did?? --K. Peake 06:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
My entire life does not revolve around another editor's featured article nomination?? I don't need to explain "what happened yesterday" to anyone. You took three days to respond when I first left comments; I don't know why you think it's appropriate to constantly hound people like this. The nomination has not even been open for two weeks and only one of the FA coordinators is active. I'll get to it soon, OK. If you had better prepared the nomination I would not have to dedicate hours reviewing. Heartfox (talk) 06:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I am sorry to have come across as harassing you maybe, but you said that more comments were to come for yesterday so it felt disappointing to have not received them. I do acknowledge that I shouldn't be posting messages to you so much, though I didn't respond until three days because I didn't see the comments due to not checking with my work schedule, while your comment about preparation is insulting since I did put a lot of hard work into the article. --K. Peake 07:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Showbuzz DailyEdit

I've just posted about the latest update at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#U.S. TV ratings sources, but uh... yikes. Magitroopa (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

@Magitroopa: I feel bad for all the cable shows that will no longer have viewership. It's very sad. For network shows, coverage was almost better in the 1970s than it is today :( Heartfox (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for the help with the Katie Joplin FAC. It was recently promoted as a FA. Your work on One of the Boys (1989 TV series) inspired to do this nomination as I genuinely did not believe the article would work in the FAC space (even though I had nominated other obscure, one-seasons shows in the past). I really enjoyed the experience with this FAC and I just wanted to thank you for inspiring me to do it in the first place! Aoba47 (talk) 02:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Congratulations on the promotion with 8(!) supports! If you need viewership/ratings for anything just let me know :) Heartfox (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the offer, and I will definitely let you know in the future. Feel free to ask me for any help with anything as well :) Aoba47 (talk) 01:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  • I actually do have a quick question. Apologies if I had already asked you this in the past, but would you by chance be able to find the ratings for Veronica Clare. I am going to nominate that article for a FAC next month (and thank you again for the help with that peer review), but it would be nice to know the ratings. I am not in a rush to nominate this as I prefer to take time between FACs to avoid stress and to make sure I give each nomination the proper attention it deserves. Aoba47 (talk) 02:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the very quick response. I will add that to the article sometime over the weekend. I hope you are doing well and have a great start to your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 03:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021Edit

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021Edit

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Australia radio release dateEdit

Hey there! From reading WP:SINGLE?, I'm not sure if The Music Network can be used as a radio release date for Australia? I am guessing no? Cool Marc 15:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

@Coolmarc: They say it is based on songs serviced to radio, but we don't know if they're all sent on the date they publish the chart, or throughout the week. It's also hard to verify because sometime the publish date changes, and there's no dates on the page. I feel like it used to be Friday but now it might be Sunday? I am no longer adding The Music Network myself, but maybe it could be included in prose as "sent to radio in Australia". But I don't think it is proper verification for a radio release date. Heartfox (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Red (Taylor Swift album) peer reviewEdit

Hello Heartfox, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. I am reaching out as you commented on Shake It Off's FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! --TheSandDoctor Talk 01:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of The Masked Singer (American TV series)Edit

 Congratulations, Heartfox! The article you nominated, The Masked Singer (American TV series), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Congrats on another job very well done! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Congratulations on the featured article! Aoba47 (talk) 22:53, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021Edit