It is The Reader that we should consider on each and every edit we make to Wikipedia.

(Thanks to Alan Liefting, via BMK)

This user prefers to communicate
on-wiki, rather than by email.

Status: Active. bd2412 T

Dispute resolution clause: By posting on my user talk page, you agree to resolve all disputes that may arise from your interactions with me through the dispute resolution processes offered within the Wikipedia Community. BD2412
Archives
By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):
Articles-1st/Deletion-1st-2d/Law-1st-2d-3d-4th-5th
Misc.-1st-2d-3d-4th/RfA-1st-2d-3d-4th/Tools-1st-2nd-3rd/Vandalism

Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):
001-002-003-004-005-006-007-008-009-010-011-012-013-014-015
016-017-018-019-020-021-022-023-024-025-026-027-028-029-030
031-032-033-034-035-036-037-038-039-040-041-042-043-044-045
046-047-048-049-050-051-052-053-054-055-056-057

MCU Credit Scenes edit

Do you have any objections with me nominating Mid-credits and post-credits scenes in the Marvel Cinematic Universe for FLC? Figured I'd check since you're one of the other major contributors to the article. -- ZooBlazer 09:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ZooBlazer: By all means, go ahead! The list is a labor of love, and as good as any, I think. BD2412 T 21:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sounds good. I'll do it whenever I get a second support on my current FLC. -- ZooBlazer 21:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of United States courts of appeals cases edit

Hey! If you're still maintaining this page, I'd recommend leafing through Category:United States courts of appeals cases and its subcategories – looks like you could expand the listings by four or five times! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: I have worked on the page, but I don't know if I would say that I am "maintaining" it. I do have in mind to add the most notable cases from the category, and probably split the list by circuit eventually. BD2412 T 21:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Naming judges edit

I see you altered some links on List of United States federal judges by longevity of service to different versions of their names (I gather to match article titles).

I think the goal here should be to standardize on the versions of the judges' names that were typically used on official and semi-official judicial rosters, and I think Samuel Rossiter Betts is in fact the usual roster name for him; Wikipedia divergence can involve either expansion or contraction from the roster name (the judge usually listed in almanacs and law books as Paul P. Rao is Paul Peter Rao while the one listed as Giles S. Rich is Giles Rich...while "John Clifford Wallace" has finally been moved to the roster-name J. Clifford Wallace his colleague normally listed as Alfred T. Goodwin is still plain Alfred Goodwin to Wikipedia, and Elbert Parr Tuttle plain Elbert Tuttle).

Does nobody who contributes there have ready access to shelves of Federal Reporters? 71.105.190.227 (talk) 19:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We use common names rather than "official" names throughout the project, both for article titles and for list entries. Common names are generally derived from common usage such as news reporting. It is always possible to propose that an article be renamed based on evidence of which form is in fact the most common usage. BD2412 T 19:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RevisionDelete Request edit

Hey - could you use RevisionDelete on revision 1211704524 on King Kong, per WP:RD2? Thanks! Staraction (talk | contribs) 00:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Staraction:   Done. Cheers! BD2412 T 00:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]