Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 14
May 16 >

May 15 edit

Template:Rurik edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 23. Primefac (talk) 09:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Athletic at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full of red links; unlikely to be needed for such a minor event. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Perhaps we should wait until the event gets underway in June. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Euronext2015 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one editor's sandbox page. No documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2015. Subst and delete, or userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Yesno/template edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fundamentally counterproductive idea for a module, see Template talk:Yesno#Switch to lua. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Legit. The startup cost of switching to Lua is helpful context; where's a good place to learn about that sort of thing? —CalendulaAsteraceae (talk • contribs) 04:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Use Module:Sandbox/CalendulaAsteraceae instead. Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Popstar to Operastar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates between three articles already well linked. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 12:09, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Twoja twarz brzmi znajomo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is nothing more than a WP:PERFNAV --woodensuperman 11:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tu cara me suena (Spain) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is nothing more than a WP:PERFNAV --woodensuperman 11:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Streetwalkers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only two notable albums, the rest of the navbox is filler. --woodensuperman 11:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hummingbird (band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All three notable albums redirect to a discography article, the rest of the navbox is filler. --woodensuperman 11:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Gass edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two notable albums, the rest of the navbox is just filler. --woodensuperman 10:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Masked Singer (American TV series) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All season links included at {{Masked Singer}} --woodensuperman 08:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Mask Singer (Thai TV series) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All season links included at {{Masked Singer}} --woodensuperman 08:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Loud LDN edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template on non-existing Loud LDN group. While individual members have articles, WP:BAND notability should be established first before the template's creation. Brandmeistertalk 10:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As an ensemble who perform together and who has (at least) seven notable members, they pass WP:MUSICBIO#C6. I've drafted an article at User:Launchballer/Loud LDN but I want to do some more work on it before I publish it.--Launchballer 12:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy the navbox. Launch's draft is promising and since he is working on it, it's best to make it a subpage of his. And once the main article is ready to be published, move it back into template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete We're missing the parent article. a case of WP:Write the article first. Even then I'm a bit doubtful, the navbox simply consists of performers. Nigej (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have now published an article on Loud LDN - the collective met WP:MUSICBIO#C6 anyway. WikiCleanerMan, Nigej - please reconsider your votes.--Launchballer 11:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still wondering where this navbox fails WP:PERFNAV since the only links are to performers. Nigej (talk) 14:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The article now exists. Thoughts on the template only listing performers?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This should now be deleted as this is still Perfnav and none of the additions outside the list of members has anything to do with this collective group. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Greek myth (other gods) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used in only three articles. The category "other gods" is highly vague, and the assortment of figures in the template seems quite random. – Michael Aurel (talk) 01:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, for now. By its contents, it should probably occur on at least twelve pages, and it has the potential to be expanded to many more; there are probably a number of Greek deities who don't neatly fit in any of the categories listed in the top sections. This template seems to be part of a series treating different groups of Greek gods separately, and specifically those not covered by the major groups, above. Possibly other groups, such as "nymphs" "winds", "muses" could be added to the top lists (and I note that Leto should probably be included among the Titans), but of course this type of editing, adding, moving, or shuffling about of individual entries, is routine maintenance, and not really a reason to delete the template. The only reason for doing so would require the conclusion that it has no useful navigational purpose, but as far as I can see, it has one. P Aculeius (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. "Other gods" is not a useful grouping. Of the articles linked, some are already included in related navigational templates (Apate in template:Greek myth (personified); nymph in template:Greek myth (nymph)); others probably would be better off there (the various winds in template:Greek myth (personified)). I can't concieve of a reason why it's helpful for an article on e.g. Pan (god) to link to Apate or the Keres and vice versa. A series of navigational templates on Greek gods is useful, but just throwing our hands up and grouping a bunch together as miscellaneous deities with nothing particularly in common isn't, and doing so when most of the entries have better places to be is actively harmful. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 12:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Blacklisted URL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded only in one editor's sandbox. No documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_15&oldid=1156529451"