LaundryPizza03

Replaceable non-free use File:Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Thank you for your thoughtful nominations and input at CFD. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Words and phrases category

Template:Words and phrases category has been nominated for merging with Template:Words and phrases. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 04:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Recent close

Hello, you closed Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 16#Films by year of setting as close/merge. Please kindly undo your close and relist the discussion. I don't think a clear consensus emerged with 2 !votes only. Thank you. -Mushy Yank. 12:06, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• While it is my own nomination, I think a relisting of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_22#Births_by_year_600_BC_-_500 would be appropriate because of User:Fayenatic london's argument. At the same time I think (for FL to confirm) that there is clear consensus to merge the 6th-century BC categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Hear hear. And yes I do not oppose merger of 6th century BC. – Fayenatic London 22:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

    I don't understand; do you want me to relist or not? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

    Yes, please relist for the sake of the ten centuries 490 BC births to 499 births, but you could acknowledge that there is consensus so far to merge 6th century BC. – Fayenatic London 10:47, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

List of isotopes .

How can I send a list of minor corrections to the List of isotopes articles? I recently send some but I am not sure I used the proper channel. There are 14 of them . Would an e-mail be better ?

Thank you. Michel Béliveau (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

I'd suggest you edit the affected articles directly. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Good morning LaundryPizza03

I will preform the edits. Here is the list of these edits so you can have a trail. Thank you. Please note that - for testing purpose - I performed the first one before sending this reply .

D11 Article = Isotopes_of_rhodium

Isotope : ¹¹⁷Rh Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ¹¹⁵Pd Should be : ¹¹⁶Pd

D12 Article = Isotopes_of_palladium

Isotope : ⁹³Pd Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ⁹¹Ru Should be : ⁹²Ru

D13 Article = Isotopes_of_palladium

Isotope : ⁹⁵Pd Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ⁹⁵Rh Should be : ⁹⁴Ru

D14 Article = Isotopes_of_cadmium

Isotope : ⁹⁸Cd Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ⁹⁷Ag Should be : ⁹⁷Pd

D15 Article = Isotopes_of_antimony

Isotope : ¹⁴²Sb Decay mode : β⁻ 2n Result specified : ¹³⁰Te Should be : ¹⁴⁰Te

D16 Article = Isotopes_of_iodine

Isotope : ¹¹¹I Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ¹¹¹Te Should be : ¹¹⁰Sb

D17 Article = Isotopes_of_iodine

Isotope : ¹⁴³I Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ¹⁴¹Xe Should be : ¹⁴²Xe

D18 Article = Isotopes_of_iodine

Isotope : ¹⁴³I Decay mode : β⁻ 2n Result specified : ¹⁴⁰Xe Should be : ¹⁴¹Xe

D19 Article = Isotopes_of_cerium

Isotope : ¹²¹Ce Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ¹²¹La Should be : ¹²⁰Ba

D20 Article = Isotopes_of_dysprosium

Isotope : ¹⁴⁷Dy Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ¹⁴⁶Tb Should be : ¹⁴⁶Gd

D21 Article = Isotopes_of_holmium

Isotope : ¹⁷⁷Ho Decay mode : β⁻ Result specified : ¹⁷⁵Er Should be : ¹⁷⁷Er

D22 Article = Isotopes_of_thulium

Isotope : ¹⁵⁶Tm Decay mode : α Result specified : ¹⁵²Er Should be : ¹⁵²Ho

D23 Article = Isotopes_of_thulium

Isotope : ¹⁵⁷Tm Decay mode : α Result specified : ¹⁵³Er Should be : ¹⁵³Ho

D24 Article = Isotopes_of_gold

Isotope : ²⁰⁹Au Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ²¹⁰Hg Should be : ²⁰⁸Hg

Michel Béliveau (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Good day.

I applied the changes but got a message for the last 2 :

D23 Article = Isotopes_of_thulium

Isotope : ¹⁵⁷Tm Decay mode : α Result specified : ¹⁵³Er Should be : ¹⁵³Ho

message = This template is missing TemplateData, and its parameters have been autogenerated. As a result the template and its parameters lack descriptions. There might be additional information on the template's page.

D24 Article = Isotopes_of_gold

Isotope : ²⁰⁹Au Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ²¹⁰Hg Should be : ²⁰⁸Hg

message = Required field missing. Are you sure you want to continue without filling the "Reference name 1" field?"

Can you fix that ?

Thank you. Michel Béliveau (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)