Notice If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter please see User:Callanecc/Emailnotice before emailing me.

Re: Sockpuppet accusationEdit

‹See TfM›

Hello, Callanecc. You have new messages at AxoIotI's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arbitration motion regarding AbortionEdit

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The one-revert restriction on all articles related to abortion, authorized by the community here and modified by the Arbitration Committee in the Abortion arbitration case, is formally taken over by the committee and vacated. Discretionary sanctions remain authorized for all pages related to abortion, broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Abortion

Help request: IP blockedEdit

Callanecc you blocked my IP address? The message is reprinted below. Can you help me unblock my IP address and recover my password? Thanks. jacobst

For talk block log logs filter log Jump to navigationJump to search This IP address is currently partially blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

09:48, 1 August 2020 Callanecc talk contribs blocked talk from editing the pages BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Houston, Bochasanwasi Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha, Swaminarayan Sampradaya, Pramukh Swami Maharaj and Mahant Swami Maharaj with an expiration time of 6 months (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Block evasion: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Swamifraud) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Nomination for merging of Template:SuppressedEdit

 Template:Suppressed has been nominated for merging with Template:Uw-selfinfo. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Interstellarity (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Page ProtectionEdit

In July, this article was subject to vandalism by a user who you blocked for sockpuppeting. You graciously enacted page protection on the articles which received the most disruption 1. Just 2 days ago, the same article in question was subject to more disruptive editing by an unregistered user, requiring multiple reverts 12345. Given that it's the 3rd instance of disruptive editing/vandalism on this article since July, I was wondering if you would consider protecting this article. Thank you. Moksha88 (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I've put pending changes on it for a year. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Excellent, I appreciate your fast response. Moksha88 (talk) 21:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)