Open main menu

Contents

Orphaned non-free image File:Olivia Jade.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Olivia Jade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Clarifying "external links" tag on Redfish (specification) pageEdit

  You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Bcornec#RfC analysis. If time allows, Bcornec and I (paid editor) would value your input. Thank you. GGSloth (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Criminal Complaint.jpgEdit

 

The file File:Criminal Complaint.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If the text is useful to an article it should be written using wikitext for accessibility. WP:IUP#FORMAT: Generally speaking, you should not contribute images consisting solely of formatted or unformatted text, tables, or mathematical formulas. In most cases these can instead be typed directly into an article in wiki markup (possibly using MediaWiki's special syntax for tables, math). This will make the information easier to edit, as well as make it accessible to users of screen readers and text-based browsers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington, My HomeEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington, My Home you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 08:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington, My HomeEdit

The article Washington, My Home you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Washington, My Home for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 06:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Edith MunroEdit

 On 25 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edith Munro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after her son, U.S. Coast Guard signalman Douglas Albert Munro, was killed in battle, 48-year-old Edith Munro (pictured) joined the Coast Guard herself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edith Munro. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Edith Munro), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations.-Nizil (talk) 05:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Washington Initiative 1639Edit

 On 26 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Washington Initiative 1639, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the sheriffs of more than a dozen of the 39 counties of Washington state have announced they will not enforce recently enacted gun-control legislation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Washington Initiative 1639. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Washington Initiative 1639), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

File:MLA logo 2018.png listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MLA logo 2018.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. funplussmart (talk) 01:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Brussels International Catholic School pageEdit

Dear Sir or Madam,

Thank you very much for notifying the publication of a wikipedia page for the Brussels International Catholic School. I would like to submit some additional references from external sources. Do I have to do this immediately on the page or should I get in touch with you?

Best regards,

Annie - Bicschoolbe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bicschoolbe (talkcontribs) 08:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Bicschoolbe - you may want to review WP:COIREQ. Chetsford (talk) 05:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Realtor.com articleEdit

Hello, Chetsford. I'm struggling to get any feedback on one particular edit request for the Realtor.com article, which I've posted here. To summarize, an anonymous editor has added some text about "social media concerns", and I believe this is a case where a specific detail is being given a lot of weight in the article, compared to the reporting. I've outlined my specific concerns and shared sourcing. User:SMcCandlish has helped with the article in the past, but is not as comfortable deciding WP:UNDUE on company articles. Per his suggestion, I posted a request at the NPOV noticeboard, and at WikiProject Companies. Neither post received any feedback apart from SMcCandlish's comments. Before I open a request for comment, I was wondering if you might be willing to review the edit request and update the article appropriately? If you prefer to pass, that's OK, I'm just trying to find an individual editor who might be willing to help before I put a larger burden on the community.

Thanks for your consideration, Inkian Jason (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Inkian Jason - I responded on the Talk page. I'll check back in three days, if that sounds okay. Chetsford (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Sounds perfect, thank you, Inkian Jason (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)Edit

Irakli Tsereteli FACEdit

Hi, I have Irakli Tsereteli at FAC again, and as you commented on the first nomination for it, I was wondering if you would be interested in taking another look at it. Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Douglas Albert MunroEdit

The article Douglas Albert Munro you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Douglas Albert Munro for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

File:South Carolina Sword of State.pngEdit

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

DYKEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Sword of State of South Carolina at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DannyS712 (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History ProjectEdit

  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for January to March 2019 reviews. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Orphaned non-free image File:The Next Web logo.pngEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Next Web logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Revolution of 1719Edit

  Hello! Your submission of Revolution of 1719 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lloyd ChalkerEdit

 On 8 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lloyd Chalker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that U.S. Coast Guard Vice Admiral Lloyd Toulmin Chalker has been credited as the "father of Coast Guard aviation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lloyd Chalker. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lloyd Chalker), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

How are all my sources unreliableEdit

I had three sources 1) a government website 2) another Wikipedia article however this was used only to illustrate the results of the last election. 3) a southend echo article which was only linked to show the fact a councillor had defected.

I have since changed the other Wikipedia article to a southend borough council link. (another government website) but the southend echo source should either stand or removed entirely as it is very hard to replace it. the southend echo also comes under semi reputable as it is a trusted news association. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatguyinthedeli (talkcontribs) 22:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

What is this regarding? Chetsford (talk) 23:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Defense of the Cutter EagleEdit

 On 13 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Defense of the Cutter Eagle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Defense of the Cutter Eagle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Defense of the Cutter Eagle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949)Edit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Chetsford".