This article needs to be updated. In particular: regarding lawsuits and current products.June 2017)(
|Founded||8 July 1991(as Barleta Ltd.)|
|James Dyson (Chief engineer)|
Jim Rowan (CEO)
|Products||Vacuum cleaners, hand dryers, desk fans, Hair dryers|
(see products listing)
|Revenue||£3.5 billion (2017)|
|£900 million (2016)|
Number of employees
Dyson Ltd is a British technology company established in the United Kingdom by Sir James Dyson in 1991. It designs and manufactures household appliances such as vacuum cleaners, air purifiers, hand dryers, bladeless fans, heaters, hair dryers, and lights. As of February 2018, Dyson had more than 12,000 employees worldwide. In January 2019 it was announced that Dyson would move its headquarters to Singapore to ramp up manufacturing for their electric vehicle, stating Asia trade will be their main focus and commenting that the company was unhappy with EU/UK bureaucratic restrictions.
In 1974, James Dyson bought a Hoover Junior vacuum cleaner, which became clogged quickly and lost suction over time. Frustrated, Dyson emptied the bag to try to restore the suction but this had no effect. On opening the bag to investigate, he noticed a layer of dust inside, clogging the fine material mesh.
Later on, Dyson was working on his ballbarrow at a previous company he had founded (but no longer entirely owned) where a large vacuum system was used to contain the fusion bonded epoxy coating that was sprayed on the wheelbarrow arms as a powder coating. Dyson found the system inefficient, and was told by equipment manufacturers that giant cyclone systems were better. Centrifugal separators are a typical method of collecting dirt, dust and debris in industrial settings. Such methods usually were not applied on a smaller scale because of the higher cost. He knew sawmills used this type of equipment, and investigated by visiting a local sawmill in dark of night and taking measurements. He then built a 30-foot model for the ballbarrow factory. While constructing this at home, Dyson realized the function of the cyclone was to extract dust without clogging. Wondering if this could be applied at a smaller scale to a home vacuum, he constructed a cardboard model with sticky tape, connected it to his Hoover with its bag removed, and found it worked satisfactorily.
The directors of the ballbarrow company thought if a better vacuum was possible, Hoover or Electrolux would have invented it. Dyson was undeterred, and was kicked out of his company. Jeremy Fry provided 49% of the investment for cyclonic vacuum development, and the rest came from a loan. In the shed behind his house, Dyson developed 5,127 prototype designs between 1979 and 1984. The first prototype vacuum cleaner, a red and blue machine, brought Dyson little success, as he struggled to find a licensee for his machine in the UK and America. Manufacturing companies such as Hoover did not want to licence the design, probably because the vacuum bag market was worth $500m so Dyson was a threat to their profits.
The only company that expressed interest in the new cyclonic vacuum technology was Dyson's former employer, Rotork. Built by Italian appliance maker Zanussi and sold by Kleeneze through a mail order catalogue, the Kleeneze Rotork Cyclon was the first publicly sold vacuum cleaner of Dyson's design. Only about 500 units were sold in 1983.
In April 1984, Dyson claimed that he had sent the prototype machines, drawings, and confidential information to American consumer-products maker, Amway as part of a proposed licensing deal. The deal fell through, however in January 1985, Amway produced the CMS-1000, a machine which was very similar to the Dyson design. Less than a month later, Dyson sued Amway for patent infringement.
In 1985 a Japanese company, Apex Ltd., expressed interest in licensing Dyson's design and in March 1986 a reworked version of the Cyclon – called G-Force – was put into production and sold in Japan for the equivalent of US$2,000. The G-Force had an attachment that could turn it into a table to save space in small Japanese apartments.[verification needed] In 1991, it won the International Design Fair prize in Japan, and became a status symbol there.
Using the income from the Japanese licence, James Dyson set up Dyson Appliances Ltd. in 1991. The first dual-cyclone vacuum built under the Dyson name, the DA 001, was produced by American company Phillips Plastics in a facility in Wrexham, Wales, beginning in January 1993 and sold for about £200. Vacuum assembly took place in the unused half of the plastic factory. Due to quality control concerns and Phillips's desire to renegotiate the terms of their contract to build the vacuum cleaner, Dyson severed the agreement in May 1993. Within two months Dyson set up a new supply chain and opened a new production facility in Chippenham, Wiltshire, England; the first vacuum built at the new facility was completed 1 July 1993. The DA 001 was soon replaced by an almost identical cleaner, the DC01.
Dyson licensed the technology in North America from 1986 to 2001 to Fantom Technologies, after which Dyson entered the market directly.
Even though market research showed that people wouldn’t be happy with a transparent container for the dust, Dyson and his team decided to make a transparent container anyway and this turned out to be a popular and enduring feature which has been heavily copied. The DC01 became the biggest selling vacuum cleaner in the UK in just 18 months. By 2001, the DC01 made up 47% of the upright vacuum cleaner market.
The company introduced a cylinder machine, the DC02, and produced a number of special editions and revised models (DC02 Absolute, DC02 De Stijl, DC05, DC04, DC06, DC04 Zorbster). On 2 January 2001 the company name was shortened from Dyson Appliances Ltd. to simply Dyson Ltd. In April of that year the DC07, a new upright vacuum cleaner using "Root Cyclone" technology with seven cyclone funnels instead of the original dual-cyclone design, was launched. By 2009 Dyson began creating other technologies: the AirBlade hand dryer, the Air Multiplier "bladeless" fan and Dyson Hot, the "bladeless" fan heater.
Production moves to Malaysia and SingaporeEdit
Dyson vacuum cleaners and washing machines were made in Malmesbury, Wiltshire until 2002, when the company transferred vacuum cleaner production to Malaysia. There was some controversy over the reason for this move, as well as over plans to expand Dyson's factory to increase production. Trade unionists in Wiltshire claimed that the move would negatively impact the local economy through the loss of jobs. The following year, washing machine production was also transferred to Malaysia. This move was driven by lower production costs in Malaysia (30% less than in the UK); it resulted in the loss of 65 jobs.
In 2004, the Meiban-Dyson Laundry Manufacturing Plant was opened in Johor, Malaysia. The RM10 million (approx. US$2.63 million) plant is a joint venture between Dyson and the Singapore-based Meiban Group Ltd., which has manufacturing facilities in Singapore, Malaysia and China. Dyson stated that the cost savings from transferring production to Malaysia enabled investment in research and development at their Malmesbury head office.
In 2007, Dyson formed a partnership with the Malaysian electronics manufacturer VS Industry Bhd (VSI) to take on a major role in Dyson's supply chain, from raw material sourcing and production to distribution. VSI also undertook an extensive production plan to supply finished product to Dyson's markets around the globe (America, UK, Japan, etc.).
It is said that Dyson has around 7,000 employees. Dyson has not publicly stated where those employees are located, though it is known that VS Industry Bhd (VSI) currently has around 4,250 employees at their Malaysian facility which manufactures Dyson products, and in 2007 it was reported that Dyson alone was responsible for 80% of VS Industry Bhd revenue.
Dyson launched a $360 million plant in Tuas, Singapore in 2013, which can produce 4 million digital motors a year. In 2016, Dyson injected $100 million to increase output to an estimated 11 million digital motors a year.
UK expansion at HullavingtonEdit
On 28 February 2017, Dyson announced a significant expansion programme in the UK, opening a new high-tech campus on the former RAF Hullavington Airfield in Hullavington, Wiltshire, about 5 miles (8 km) south of its Malmesbury site. It has been suggested that research there will focus on battery technologies, following the acquisition of US start-up Sakti3, and robotics.
HQ moving to SingaporeEdit
On 22 January 2019, Dyson announced plans to move the company HQ to Singapore, to be closer to its fastest growing markets.
In 2014, Dyson invested in a joint robotics lab with Imperial College London to investigate vision systems and engineer a generation of household robots. In 2001 they were close to launching a robot vacuum, the DC06, but James Dyson pulled it from the production line as it was too heavy and slow.
Dyson invested in a Dyson Chair at the University of Cambridge in November 2011. The Dyson Professor of Fluid Mechanics focuses on teaching and researching the science and engineering behind air movement. In addition, Dyson invested hundreds of thousands pounds in a Dyson research branch at Newcastle University in May 2012 to investigate the next generation of Dyson digital motor and motor drive.
In March 2015, Dyson invested in its first outside business, paying $15m for an undisclosed stake in US battery start-up Sakti3, which is developing solid-state batteries. Dyson acquired the remaining stake in Sakti3 for $90m in October 2015. Dyson researchers had been working on battery technology since 2010. In 2017, Dyson abandoned its licensing of patents held by University of Michigan, fuelling doubts over Sakti3's technology.
In late September 2017, company founder James Dyson announced via email to employees that the company has 400 people working on a battery electric vehicle, secretly in the works for two years, which it hopes to release by 2020. Further information about the company's plans emerged in February 2018, with news of three electric vehicles in the works as part of an estimated $2.8B project. Even with the company's investment in solid state batteries, sources report that the initial lower-volume high-end model will likely still use current generation battery technology.
James Dyson Award and James Dyson FoundationEdit
The James Dyson Award is an international student design award running in 18 countries. It is run by the James Dyson Foundation, James Dyson's charitable trust, as part of its mission to encourage the next generation of design engineers to be creative, challenging and inventive. The James Dyson Award is presented jointly to students and their university.
The James Dyson Foundation aims to inspire young people to study engineering and become engineers. By visiting schools and universities and providing workshops for young people, the foundation hopes to encourage creativity and ingenuity. Over 727 schools in Great Britain and Northern Ireland have used Dyson's educational "Ideas Boxes", sent to teachers and pupils, in order to learn more about the design process. The James Dyson Foundation also provides bursaries and scholarships to aspiring engineers.
The Dyson Institute of Engineering and TechnologyEdit
In November 2016, James Dyson announced plans to open a higher education institute to address the engineering skills gap in the UK. In September 2017 it welcomed its first cohort of undergraduates, partnering with the University of Warwick to offer BEng degrees in Engineering, whilst also employing them as engineers 3 days per week. The second cohort of students, joining in September 2018, was made up of 40% female undergraduates, compared to a national average of 15.1% for Engineering.
Lawsuits and controversiesEdit
Patent infringement lawsuitsEdit
Amway and HooverEdit
In 1985, Dyson sued Amway for copyright infringement of a Dyson dual cyclone prototype machine. Dyson claimed that he had sent the prototype machines, drawings, and confidential information to Amway as part of a contract in April 1984. In January 1985, Amway produced the CMS-1000, a machine which was very similar to the Dyson design. Less than a month later, Dyson sued Amway.[needs update]. Dyson and Amway settled the lawsuit in 1991, becoming joint licensees. 
In 2006, Dyson sued the parts manufacturer Qualtex for copyright and unregistered design right infringement, for creating and selling deliberate imitations of Dyson's original vacuum cleaner parts. Dyson was seeking to prevent the sale of spare parts made by Qualtex to fit and match Dyson vacuum cleaners. The Qualtex parts in question were intended to resemble closely the Dyson spares, not least as they were visible in the normal use of the vacuum cleaners. The Chinese manufacturer that produced certain parts for Qualtex was found to have copied the visual design of some of Dyson's spare parts. Following the victory, £100,000 was donated to the Royal College of Art to help young designers protect their designs.
In 2010, Dyson launched legal action against rival manufacturer Vax, claiming the design of its Mach Zen vacuum cleaner is an infringement of the registered design of its first "bagless" Dyson cylinder vacuum DC02, which dates back to 1994. Dyson also claimed the Chinese-owned rival had "flagrantly copied" Dyson's iconic design. However, the court backed an earlier decision which rejected Dyson's claims, as the two designs did not produce "the same overall impression" on the informed user. The courts held that the two cleaners were "different designs", the Dyson cleaner being "smooth, curving and elegant", the Vax cleaner being "rugged, angular and industrial".
In August 2013, Dyson sued Samsung Electronics over claims his company's steering technology was infringed. The product that was targeted, Samsung's "Motion Sync", allegedly infringed the design of a steering mechanism for cylinder cleaners, patented by Dyson in 2009. It describes a way to allow a vacuum cleaner to spin quickly from one direction to another on the spot, and to follow the user's path rather than just being dragged behind, in order to prevent the vacuum getting snagged on corners. But three months after it filed the lawsuit, Dyson voluntarily dropped the litigation for unknown reasons. Samsung filed a counter suit for ₤6 million for compensation for hurting Samsung's corporate image.[needs update]
On 5 December 2012, a lawsuit by hand dryer manufacturer Excel Dryer was filed against Dyson, claiming that Dyson's advertising comparing the Airblade to the Excel Dryer Xlerator was deceptive. Dyson's advertisements stated that the Xlerator produced twice as much carbon dioxide, was worse for the environment, and cost more to operate than the Airblade. Excel Dryer claimed that Dyson was falsifying its comparisons by submitting a 20-second dry time for the Xlerator to the Materials Systems Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, rather than Excel Dryer's tested 12 second dry time, thus inflating energy consumption figures in the Airblade's favour.[needs update]
Criticisms regarding foreign studentsEdit
This section needs to be updated.June 2017)(
In March 2011, James Dyson reportedly said in an interview for The Sunday Times that British universities were allowing Chinese nationals to study engineering and spy on the departments where they were working, enabling them to take technology back to China after completing their studies. In the interview he was quoted as saying that "Britain is very proud about the number of foreign students we educate at our universities, but actually all we are doing is educating our competitors. [...] I've seen frightening examples. Bugs are even left in computers so that the information continues to be transmitted after the researchers have returned home."
David Willetts, the government minister responsible for British universities, said he would thoroughly investigate the statement provided by James Dyson. He has also criticised the Chinese authorities for failing to act on patent infringements.
Lobbying on copyright issues with ChinaEdit
In December 2011, The Independent reported that Bell Pottinger executive Tim Collins had been filmed by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism saying that David Cameron had raised a copyright issue with Chinese premier Wen Jiabao on behalf of Dyson Limited "because we asked him to".
Dyson suit alleging industrial espionage on motor technologyEdit
In 2012, Yong Pang, an engineer specialist in electric motors, was accused of stealing Dyson's digital motor technology which was a part of future product development projects. The motors, in development over 15 years, incorporated microchip “digital impulse technology” to spin at 104,000 rpm in order to draw high volumes of air through the appliance, and were not licensed to any other companies. Yong Pang and his wife Yali Li allegedly set up a front company "ACE Electrical Machine Design" to receive payments of £11,650 from Bosch while Pang was working for Dyson. Dyson claimed that trade secrets were passed to Bosch's Chinese motor manufacturer.[needs update]
Siemens and Bosch energy requirements allegationsEdit
In 2015, Dyson charged that Siemens and Bosch vacuums were using a sensor that sent signals to its motor to increase its power while the machine sucked up dust remnants, making them appear more competent during European Union (EU) efficiency tests. Because tests are conducted in dust-free labs, Dyson claimed that this gave an unfair reading, because in a real home environment the machines used much more power. Dyson said both brands have "capitalized on loopholes" found within the EU regulations to be granted an AAAA energy consumption rating, when actual domestic use showed they performed similarly to an "E" or "F" rating. Dyson issued proceedings against Bosch in Netherlands and France, and against Siemens in Germany and Belgium.
However, BSH’s Hausgeräte, which makes household appliances under the Bosch and Siemens brands explained that many of its machines contain “intelligent sensor technology” to avoid loss of suction, which control the vacuum cleaner motor automatically. After weeks of court proceedings, Dyson lost the court battle against Bosch; the courts in the Netherlands decided that Dyson accusations were baseless.
Dyson suit against European CommissionEdit
Until 2017, European Union regulations had required vacuum cleaners be tested when empty, a ruling which greatly favoured bagged vacuum cleaners. Dyson sued the European Commission, resulting in a judgement requiring testing be done under normal usage conditions.
- "DYSON LIMITED: Company number 02627406". Companies House. Her Majesty the Queen. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
- correspondent, Rupert Neate Wealth (22 January 2019). "Dyson to move company HQ to Singapore". Retrieved 19 July 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
- "Asia sales power Dyson's profits up 41%". The Financial Times. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
- Jolly, Jasper (23 October 2018). "Dyson to build electric cars in Singapore – with 2021 launch planned". Guardian. London.
- Tovey, Alan (28 February 2017). "Dyson to increase UK base tenfold as it buys ex-RAF base to satisfy expansion plans". Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
- McIllroy, John (22 January 2019). "Dyson electric car: former BMW and Infiniti boss Roland Krueger to lead project". Auto Express. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
- Neate, Rupert (22 January 2019). "Dyson to move company HQ to Singapore". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
- Jarvis, Jacob (22 January 2019). "Dyson's decision to move head office from UK to Singapore nothing to do with Brexit". Evening Standard. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
- Dyson, James (2008). Against The Odds. South Western.
- "A new idea". Inside Dyson. Archived from the original on 8 June 2013. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
- NPR (12 February 2018). "How I Built This with Guy Raz -Dyson: James Dyson".
- James Dyson - Against the Odds
- Earl, Peter; Wakeley, Tim (2005). Business Economics: A Contemporary Approach. McGraw-Hill Education. pp. 142–146. ISBN 0077103920.
- "How To Make It". The New Yorker. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
- "James Dyson: Business whirlwind". BBC News. 5 February 2002. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
- "A Clear Bin Policy". RGC Jenkins & Co., Trade Mark and Patent Attorneys. Archived from the original on 18 October 2006.
- Crewe, Louise; Gregson, Nicky; Metcalfe, Alan (2009). "The Screen and the Drum: On Form, Function, Fit and Failure in Contemporary Home Consumption". Design and Culture. 1 (3).
- "Dyson Vacuum Cleaners, Fans, Heaters & Tools - Official Site". dyson.com.
- Allbusiness - Dyson rekindles war of words on Malaysia switch
- "800 jobs axed as Dyson moves to Far East".
- "BBC News - BUSINESS - Dyson to move to Far East".
- "BBC NEWS - UK - England - Wiltshire - Fresh blow for Dyson plant". bbc.co.uk.
- "Dyson production moves to Malaysia". The Daily Telegraph.
- "Design News - Serving the 21st Century Design Engineer". appliancemagazine.com.
- Dyson plant shuts up shop (26 September 2002)
- The Star- VSI sees RM1b sales via Dyson tie-up (5 June 2007)
- Ruddick, Graham (13 September 2016). "Sir James Dyson upbeat about Brexit as company invests in expansion" – via The Guardian.
- EMIS- V.S. Industry Berhad
- The Star- Contracts put VS Industry in good stead (8 October 2007)
- "British vacuum-maker Dyson is cleaning up in Asia". Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved 19 July 2019.
- "Dyson injects $100m to expand Tuas plant". Retrieved 19 July 2019.
- Ruddick, Graham (28 February 2017). "Dyson shrugs off Brexit fears with massive UK expansion plan". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
- "Dyson to increase UK base tenfold as it buys ex-RAF base to satisfy expansion plans". The Telegraph. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
- "Brexit backer Dyson moves vacuum giant's HQ to Singapore". 22 January 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2019 – via uk.reuters.com.
- "Sir James Dyson plans to make affordable household robots". Telegraph.co.uk. 9 February 2014.
- Colin Smith. "Dyson and Imperial to develop next generation robots at new centre". imperial.ac.uk.
- "Dyson invests £5m in robotic vision lab with Imperial". BBC News.
- "Ingenious Britain: Dyson invests £1.4m in academic research at Cambridge". cam.ac.uk.
- "Dyson makes first external investment with move into batteries". Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
- "Dyson buys up rest of 'solid-state' battery company". Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
- LeVine, Steve. "Dyson has abandoned patents aimed at creating a battery-and-car juggernaut resembling Tesla". Quartz. Retrieved 5 April 2017.
- Pollock, Ian (26 September 2017). "Dyson to make electric cars from 2020". Retrieved 19 July 2019 – via www.bbc.com.
- Wiener-Bronner, Danielle (26 September 2017). "Dyson plans to launch an electric car by 2020". CNNMoney. Retrieved 19 July 2019.
- Campbell, Pooler. "Dyson bets on electric cars to shake up industry". Financial Times. Retrieved 17 February 2018.
- Ballaban, Michael. "Dyson's Plan To Build Three Electric Cars From Scratch Is Nuts And Just Might Work". Jalopnik. Retrieved 17 February 2018.
- "There could be an entire line of Dyson electric cars". The Verge. Retrieved 17 February 2018.
- "About the Award". James Dyson Award. James Dyson Foundation. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
- "Home - James Dyson Foundation". James Dyson Foundation. Archived from the original on 26 October 2011.
- "Dyson to open UK-based Institute of Technology". The Engineer. 7 November 2016. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
- "Home - Dyson Institute". www.dysoninstitute.com. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
- "Dyson Institute welcomes its second cohort of engineering students". The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
- "British Inventor Claims Theft of Vacuum Idea v". The Argus Press. 9 May 1988.
- Eng, Dinah. "How James Dyson Created a $3 Billion Vacuum Empire". Retrieved 4 August 2019.
- Robert Uhlig, Technology Correspondent (4 October 2000). "Dyson cleans up in patent battle with rival Hoover". Telegraph.co.uk.
- "Lawdit Solicitors - Unregistered Design Rights and the Dyson Case".
- "Dyson sues rival Vax over vacuum cleaner design". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Dyson loses Vax court battle about vac design". Which UK. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Blood on the carpet as Dyson loses court battle". The Times. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Case No: A3/2010/2498: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CHANCERY DIVISION)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Samsung Sued by Dyson Technology Over Vacuum Steering Patent". Bloomberg. 10 September 2013.
- Leo Kelion (10 September 2013). "Dyson sues Samsung over new vacuum's steering mechanism". BBC Technology.
- Kim Yoo-chul (16 February 2014). "Samsung files $9.43mil. suit against Dyson". Korea Times.
- "xcelerator v dyson". Docstoc.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2014.
- "Overseas Students in UK Stealing Technology Secrets: James Dyson Told UK's Sunday Times newspaper". Allvoices.com. 28 March 2011. Archived from the original on 29 March 2011. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
- "Are British inventions at risk from Chinese students?". Ibtimes.com. 28 March 2011. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
- Kenneth Tan (28 March 2011). "UK inventor Sir James Dyson: Chinese students are stealing our secrets". Shanghaiist. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
- "'Spy' at the centre of Dyson espionage case named". telegraph. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- Robert Watts and Jack Grimston (27 March 2011). "Chinese students steal secrets: inventor James Dyson". The Australian. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
- Newman, Melanie; Wright, Oliver (6 December 2011). "Caught on camera: top lobbyists boasting how they influence the PM - UK Politics - UK - The Independent". The Independent. London.
- "Conservatives under pressure to explain links to lobbying firms". The Daily Telegraph. London. 6 December 2011.
- "'Chinese spy' furore over vacuum secrets". Independent.ie. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
- "British Vacuum Cleaner Manufacturer Accuses Chinese Spy Of Stealing Secrets For German Rival". Business Insider. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Dyson spy 'leaked files to Chinese'". The Sunday Times. Archived from the original on 24 February 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Dyson accuses Bosch of paying research spy". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Next 'VW scandal'? Dyson accuses German vacuums of test cheating". CNBC. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
- "German vacuum cleaner firm set to sue Dyson over energy-test claims". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
- "Dyson sucked into power struggle with German groups". The Finance Times. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
- "Dyson loses legal battle with Bosch over vacuum row". Telegraph. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
- "Dyson in Historic EU Court Win against EU Regulation". May 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
- Chee, Foo Yun (8 November 2018). "Dyson wins fight against EU energy labelling rules". Reuters.