IAmNMFlores
IMPORTANT FOR THOSE WHO POST ON MY TALK PAGE edit
Editing on Wiki is one of my favorite hobbies, and I love helping to improve articles the way I can. If I make mistakes, I promise they are all in good faith and do not mean any harm. I humbly ask if you are here to warn me to please discuss if I have made some mistake. I promise to keep improving when needed, as I do not wish to lose the privilege of editing alongside y'all and improving articles throughout Wikipedia. Thanks. IAmNMFlores (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
May 2024 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)- I know you personally prefer for the production comapnies to be cited in the infobox, but I didn't "blank" the info or left info uneverified like in #2 on WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. As said in my appeal below, the companies were mentioned in the lead sentence so I moved the citation there so everything was still verified. IAmNMFlores (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
IAmNMFlores (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Citations for production/distributor put outside infobox; DreamWorks Animation is NOT a distribution company
Simply, I moved the citation(s) from the infobox to the lead which contained the same information. The citation was to verify the studio(s), distributor(s), and country, which were all stated in the intro sentence; my intention was to reduce the uses of the citation from three times separetely in the infobox, to once in the intro sentence thus not leaving the information cited unverified.
As seen in the changes I made, I forgot to add in the summary that I did replace a citation,<ref name="AFI"/>, as it contained multiple pieces of info that contradicted other sources, notably the inclusion of DreamWorks Animation as a distributor. The replacement, <ref name="NUM/>, was sourced already elsewhere in the article, and does contain the studio, distributor, and country info within. IAmNMFlores (talk) 01:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It was a misunderstanding, I did not blank info, or leave info without sources for [[Monsters vs. Aliens]]. As I had stated on the edit summary for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monsters_vs._Aliens&oldid=1222580265 19:10, 6 May 2024]: <blockquote class="templatequote " >Citations for production/distributor put outside infobox; DreamWorks Animation is NOT a distribution company</blockquote> Simply, I moved the citation(s) from the infobox to the lead which contained the same information. The citation was to verify the '''studio(s)''', '''distributor(s)''', and '''country''', which were all stated in the intro sentence; my intention was to reduce the uses of the citation from three times separetely in the infobox, to once in the intro sentence thus not leaving the information cited unverified. As seen in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monsters_vs._Aliens&diff=prev&oldid=1222580265 changes I made], I forgot to add in the summary that I did replace a citation, <code><ref name="AFI"/></code>, as it contained multiple pieces of info that contradicted other sources, notably the inclusion of DreamWorks Animation as a distributor. The replacement, <code><ref name="NUM/></code>, was sourced already elsewhere in the article, and does contain the studio, distributor, and country info within. [[User:IAmNMFlores|IAmNMFlores]] ([[User talk:IAmNMFlores#top|talk]]) 01:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=It was a misunderstanding, I did not blank info, or leave info without sources for [[Monsters vs. Aliens]]. As I had stated on the edit summary for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monsters_vs._Aliens&oldid=1222580265 19:10, 6 May 2024]: <blockquote class="templatequote " >Citations for production/distributor put outside infobox; DreamWorks Animation is NOT a distribution company</blockquote> Simply, I moved the citation(s) from the infobox to the lead which contained the same information. The citation was to verify the '''studio(s)''', '''distributor(s)''', and '''country''', which were all stated in the intro sentence; my intention was to reduce the uses of the citation from three times separetely in the infobox, to once in the intro sentence thus not leaving the information cited unverified. As seen in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monsters_vs._Aliens&diff=prev&oldid=1222580265 changes I made], I forgot to add in the summary that I did replace a citation, <code><ref name="AFI"/></code>, as it contained multiple pieces of info that contradicted other sources, notably the inclusion of DreamWorks Animation as a distributor. The replacement, <code><ref name="NUM/></code>, was sourced already elsewhere in the article, and does contain the studio, distributor, and country info within. [[User:IAmNMFlores|IAmNMFlores]] ([[User talk:IAmNMFlores#top|talk]]) 01:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=It was a misunderstanding, I did not blank info, or leave info without sources for [[Monsters vs. Aliens]]. As I had stated on the edit summary for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monsters_vs._Aliens&oldid=1222580265 19:10, 6 May 2024]: <blockquote class="templatequote " >Citations for production/distributor put outside infobox; DreamWorks Animation is NOT a distribution company</blockquote> Simply, I moved the citation(s) from the infobox to the lead which contained the same information. The citation was to verify the '''studio(s)''', '''distributor(s)''', and '''country''', which were all stated in the intro sentence; my intention was to reduce the uses of the citation from three times separetely in the infobox, to once in the intro sentence thus not leaving the information cited unverified. As seen in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monsters_vs._Aliens&diff=prev&oldid=1222580265 changes I made], I forgot to add in the summary that I did replace a citation, <code><ref name="AFI"/></code>, as it contained multiple pieces of info that contradicted other sources, notably the inclusion of DreamWorks Animation as a distributor. The replacement, <code><ref name="NUM/></code>, was sourced already elsewhere in the article, and does contain the studio, distributor, and country info within. [[User:IAmNMFlores|IAmNMFlores]] ([[User talk:IAmNMFlores#top|talk]]) 01:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}