External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neha Kakkar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Cleaned content. edit

The article was written like news and a lot of promotional stuff was there. I have heavily cleaned up the article and have made necessary changes to make sure that the content adheres to Wiki guidelines. I also have removed the PR tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatill (talkcontribs) 09:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Section titled "Plagiarism Allegations" - Regarding edit

In this section, a claim is made that Neha Kakkar ravages and plagiarizes lyrics - this may be a claim too far, especially the latter. This is because in most controversies including the latest surrounding "O Sajna," the original artist does not have an exclusive copyright any longer. The sourcing of the claims on plagiarism is from substandard sources that use the word 'plagiarism' very loosely, imho. -- Gurubrahma (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Agreed - the section has WP:BLP and WP:NPOV issues, and having an entire section probably isn’t WP:DUE. I haven’t gotten around to taking a look at the sources to see what’s salvageable. Politanvm talk 21:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply