No authorityEdit

who have u the authority to comment on ram setu wiki page? dont interfere in our matters if u are ignorant on that topic GauravMaP (talk) 10:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

GauravMaP, I have to be honest, I have no idea what you're talking about. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
I think it's the common argument made by many Indians that non-Indians "have no right to comment" on issues related to India. Gaurav is, I think, referring to Adam's Bridge and the move requests there. @GauravMaP: Please do not be rude. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 09:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Ah, yes. I have to assume Adam's Bridge is the WP:COMMONNAME in english, since there is an existing consensus to keep it at that name. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

exactly....still u decided to write a reply on the page "adam's bridge"... GauravMaP (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for commentEdit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:In the news on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

User:2RhwjtEdit

Please Don't Block Me 2Rhwjt (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

CicisEdit

There seems to be legitimate confusion about how this company currently names itself, so I do not see that particular edit as vandalism. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Cullen328, in on mobile right now trying to revert the edits, so I was just using the rvv function in redwarn. It seems pretty clear the edits are intended either as vandalism or cover for sneaky vandalism. If you'd like I can stop. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I fo not object to the revert but please don't label any edit as vandalism unless it is unambiguously vandalism. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Does intention factor into an edit being vandalism? Their earlier account was blocked indef for block evasion after your initial block, and 80 percent of the edits were subtle vandalism with a few correct or questionable for cover. Would that qualify the totality of the edits as vandalism? I did switch to using rollback for the edits that were just bad rather than intentional misinformation or vandalism, but the extra effort didn't seem worth it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Each individual edit should be evaluated on its merits and it is possible for an editor to make some edits that are vandalism and others that aren't. Subtle vandalism complicates matters and often it is difficult for an editor who isn't fully conversant with the topic to say for sure. But edits can be reverted for being unreferenced or dubious or not an improvement. In my view, it is best to reserve the vandalism label for unambiguous vandalism. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't disagree, but on mobile it's difficult to write out full edit summaries and such, and I didn't want all of the subtle problems introduced to be edited over, making three work of removing it a degree of magnitude more difficult than just hitting the revert button. In the future I'll strive to use regular reverts and leave edit summaries. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I do 99%+ of my editing on Android smartphones (including now) and only use a desktop computer to edit image files. I use the fully functional desktop site on my phone. You might consider that as well. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for commentEdit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rainbow flag (LGBT) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for commentEdit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for commentEdit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Miles Davis on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for commentEdit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ismail I on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)