Open main menu

User talk:Muboshgu

Active discussions

A cake just for thee!Edit

WikiCup 2018 November newsletterEdit

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is   Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1.   Courcelles (submissions)
  2.   Kosack (submissions)
  3.   Kees08 (submissions)
  4.   SounderBruce (submissions)
  5.   Cas Liber (submissions)
  6.   Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7.   Iazyges (submissions)
  8.   Ceranthor (submissions)

All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

WikiCup 2019 March newsletterEdit

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  •   L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  •   Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  •   MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  •   Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  •   Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  •   Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

The following improvements need to be made to the page for Vicente Gonzalez (politician)Edit

Information needs to be updated. The current information holds sources that support this update. All other updates can be sourced through resources from Vicente Gonzalez's congressional website:

If I am not "allowed" to make these changes on a website that promotes the ability to do so, then please direct me to whoever can make these changes. If not, I will continue to push for these changes (which are verifiable), until the changes are made.

Requested changes below:

Early life, education, and early careerEdit

Gonzalez was born in Corpus Christi, Texas in 1967[2] to [Olga Cantu] and [Vicente Gonzalez], a Korean War veteran and U.S. Merchant Marine. Gonzalez attended Roman Catholic School in Corpus Christi for part of his primary education, but eventually dropped out of high school during his junior year. He went onto obtain a G.E.D. and returned to school by enrolling at Del Mar Junior College where he received an Associate’s Degree in Banking and Finance.[3][4]

In 1992, Gonzalez received his Bachelor of Science degree in aviation business administration from the Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University on the Corpus Christi Naval Air Station. After high school, and throughout college, Gonzalez traveled to almost 100 countries around the world.

In 1996, Gonzalez obtained his Juris Doctor from Texas Wesleyan University School of Law (now Texas A&M University School of Law) in Fort Worth, Texas. While a law student, he interned for then Congressman Solomon P. Ortiz (D-TX-27). He trained in Negotiation at Harvard Law School [in Cambridge, Massachusetts]. In 1997, he founded the law firm, V. Gonzalez & Associates, in McAllen, Texas. He is a member of the Bar Associations of Texas and New York.[5]

As an attorney, Gonzalez successfully recovered millions in proceeds for businesses, homeowners and public schools throughout the country. His professional successes prompted an invitation to join the prestigious Million Dollar & Multi-million Dollar Advocates Forum, a membership reserved for less than one percent of American attorneys.

Gonzalez's wife, Lorena Saenz Gonzalez, is a former educator and school administrator from McAllen, Texas.

Peter Handke editEdit

I did not engage in edit warring. I reverted his revert of my good-faith and objective addition only once, then requested page protection. I would like my addition to be restored and the editor to be prevented from changing it, as there is nothing inaccurate or malicious within my addition; in fact, it simply serves as further information on Hendke's page. Everything was properly cited and formated, to boot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbabuch (talkcontribs) 23:11, 16 October 2109 (UTC)

@Gbabuch: The citations and formatting are not the issue here. The issue is neutrality. WP:CONTROVERSYSECTIONS violate neutrality by producing an undue emphasis on negative material. Also, that material has been relocated throughout the article, so that you are addiction of a controversy section is stating the controversial information twice. The other editors have mentioned this in their edit summaries. Therefore, your edit will not be reinserted. Any attempts on your part 2 reinsert it constitute edit warring, and may result in a block. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION is an essay. Whether something adheres to NPOV is a content dispute, which should be resolved through a discussion. You cannot give mandates like "Therefore, your edit will not be reinserted".
Why not just tell everybody to go to the article talk page or WP:BLPN? There is a discussion at BLPN: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Peter Handke. One editor said "I don't think it's unreasonable that the controversies take up almost half Peter Handke". This was on 10 October, when there was a separate controversy section. Politrukki (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit war resolvingEdit

If you would scroll to the bottom, the bottom reference from soapboxie is, in fact, the reference. I don't want to take this any higher. Please, just tell me the problem. If soapboxie isn't reliable, then what about CNN? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua12450 (talkcontribs)

@Joshua12450:, I do not know "soapboxie". There should be a citation immediately following the content it is citing. I suggest using the article talk page to form consensus. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Sahar AjdamsaniEdit

Hello dear Muboshgu Hope yiu are well. I improved the article, please check out it. Music in Iran is forbidden and prohibition for women but she do, and if you read the sources you will find that many countries have written about this person that this is not the usual and there is very few artists in the world are at this level of globalization. . this article has more than 20 URL's of different & reliable sources related to subject. She has many news coverages & awards & she released a world peace music album & collected 12 countries artists to this album to show world peace & UN 7 Unicef supported her for this album “Dreamy World”. The following is also my reasons for verifiable an article based on Wikipedia rules: Based on Wikipedia : Notability (music) , based on the following paragraphs, the notability is valid :

-Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

-Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.

-Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.

-Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

-Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.

-Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. -Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.

& based on general notability; f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.

& based on notability (people) People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published, secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. e person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field. Also based on Wikipedia: Proof, Wikipedia: Referrals and Wikipedia: Neutral Perspectives, this article introduces an artist who has just introduced her & is Impartial and all the statements are referenced to reliable sources (valid news agencies from several countries that is shown her internationally recognized) and can be verified, & also articles of Iranian artists similar her are all confirmed and featured on Wikipedia. & also based on Wikipedia: the removal policy, this article is not eligible for removal. ( If order and need, I will translate all Persian news in English too ) Special thanks Best wishes Kind regardsSahar410 (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019Edit

Joe Biden and Mr. XEdit

Even though Mr. X undid my edit for no reason on the Joe Biden page I tried to discuss it with him but he just gave me all sorts of B.S. reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhiladelphiaPhilliesFan (talkcontribs) 22:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC) IT WAS NOT A REVERT FOR THE 5TH BILLION TIME! IT WAS A NEW EDIT!!! WHY CAN'T YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT?! NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!!NEW EDIT!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT NOW?! IT WAS NOT A DAMN REVERT! IT WAS NEW A EDIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I can understand this guy, it's really annoying how you antagonize people and then enforce irrelevant wikipedia rules while ignoring facts. Wikipedia is falling down and I'm beginning to understand why the quality has deteriorated in recent years - suggest name change to Wikipinion --Wikireadia2020 (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikireadia2020, I suggest you'd feel more at home on Conservapedia. The agenda you're trying to push will fit in there. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm not trying to push an agenda - it is you who is trying to push an agenda. I'm interested in knowledge and facts - that's what I thought Wikipedia was all about? I was wrong. Wikireadia2020 (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

It's just offensive to me as an intellectual all the anti-intellectualism.. I hate conservatives as much as Democrats, they are all greedy and corrupt. I'm a libertarian.. an anarchist. It's just difficult to watch the poorly defended thesis, I'm posting links to facts and you are throwing food at me. Sorry. Wikireadia2020 (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikireadia2020, if you want knowledge and facts, start by recalibrating which sources you trust and which ones you don't. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Seriously, you are referencing sites that are known to be either highly biased or outright pushers of fraudulent material. Please realize that this is an encyclopedia, not a blog. And no one cares what you are. What any of us believe is irrelevant to what we add or remove. We simply follow the guidelines as best we can to ensure WP:NPOV. You are basing your edits on known sites that push goofy conspiracies. O3000 (talk) 01:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

You guys are a bunch of opinionated bureaucrats. You are experts at rules (form) but have no understanding of essence (what things really are). Wikipedia is the site that pushes goofy conspiracies, not the other way around, that's why I decided to join. I can tell you for a fact that 50% of the content on Wikipedia is incorrect. But it's correct according to your rules. Respectfully, you have a lot of homework to do. And what you believe is very relevant because it is based on your views and opinions, and political bias, that you decide what is a conspiracy and what is a fact. It's not objective, and that's why no one takes Wikipedia seriously anymore. CNN is a known site that promotes goofy conspiracies, yet for Wikipedia it's considered a highly credible source. Wikireadia2020 (talk) 02:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, I realize that you try to contribute to something, however something obviously doesn't work. I've been a writer for 20 years on complex topics and I've used Wikipedia as a source (CITATION) reference in articles, hundreds of articles, books, research reports, PhD thesis, readers would chastise me and I defended Wikipedia. Recently I've noticed that when you go to a page to get the facts, they have been 'edited' and then if you try to fix them here comes a troll to 'override' you. I've been using Wikipedia since day one heavily but never contributed. The content quality has seriously deteriorated, so please tell me why this is happening, and why since 2016? If it's not trolls, what is it? Wikipedia **used to be** an encyclopedia, now it's a quasi forum/blog whereby administrators push their opinion by overruling any dissent. Wikireadia2020 (talk) 02:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Doctor Who (series 12)Edit

Per this reply, what do you mean by "Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection"? Here is a non-exhaustive list of reverts that we've had to make to the article in the past week: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Almost all of them concern the addition of an unsourced premiere date. What constitutes enough "disruptive activity to justify protection"? -- /Alex/21 14:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Yet another [16] since. -- /Alex/21 23:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Alex 21, I believe that when I looked at it yesterday, I saw high edit volume with many constructive edits by IPs. Perhaps I was wrong. I just protected the page for three days. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you; it's greatly appreciated. -- /Alex/21 23:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

  Administrator changes

  AkhilleusAthaenaraJohn VandenbergMelchoirMichaelQSchmidtNeilNYoungamerican😂

  CheckUser changes


  Interface administrator changes


  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news



Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Mike MoustakasEdit

hi, I saw that you removed what I had added to his page. I had two sources about what I was adding to the page. the sources are: and

Unconfirmed. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


As far as being neutral that would mean you stand in the middle and do not take any sides. You can explain the rally and such but Kessler simply tried to arrange a Unite the Right (to free speech) and a bunch of idiots showed up. That was not his fault. Does the Black lives Matter page say they are Black Panthers and black supremacist? Please try to as you said make the article neutral and let people make their own mind up. There were blacks that were standing with him. KimNFred (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

KimNFred, Kessler is a white supremacist and it's no accident that his Unite the Right rally attracted many white supremacists. Do not pretend that this wasn't the purpose of the rally. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Could you please provide sources/proof of him being a white supremacist. No fake news please. He simply wanted to have a voice for white people as blacks have their own. My brother-in-law is black and he does not feel he was being a white supremacist any video Kessler made stated he never spoke of hate or taking sides. I am Italian. To call him a white supremacist is wrong and incorrect. The Black lives Matter movement is filled with hate. Do you believe Michael Jackson is guilty? I don't. I believe Michael Jackson was a good person and an excellent entertainer. I love MJ and will always back his innocence. Again, I'm going to go check now, does the Black lives Matter movement say they are Black Panthers or Black Supremacist? Let's be neutral as you stated. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KimNFred (talkcontribs) 17:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Hunter Biden French WikipediaEdit

Hi, while reading the French Wikipedia Hunter Biden page I was astonished by the quality of it, it is a copy-paste of GOP and FOX talking points only referencing damaging private details (cocaïne, prostitues, adultery...) why also promoting debunked conspiracy theories.

I tried to modify the page, first I deleted all which was maybe excessive, but then I only tried to translate the English Wikipedia page, which is more neutral into French. Even that was blocked though. I referenced all this on the discussion page but got no response except blocking attempts by russian trolls. I was told to contact the french page owners, but seeing all what was referenced and biased on it, I truly have little trust in them. Could some redacters from the English Hunter Page wage on this with French-speaking Wikipedia administrators, as the differences of quality on information on English and french page are appalling, it's like two opposing stories. And it is really unacceptable what is currently printed on the french page, it's not neutral, full of debunked lies or not relevant. ty for any help to restore some dignity or truth... --Nicolas.eisbar (talk) 10:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Nicolas.eisbar, I unfortunately do not speak any French. I'll copy-paste your comment to Talk:Hunter Biden for wider discussion. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019Edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tulsi Gabbard; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Note that the article is sanctioned to 1RR. Please self-revert or I have got no choice except to report.--SharabSalam (talk) 03:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC) SharabSalam (talk) 03:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussionEdit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Muboshgu reported by User:SharabSalam (Result: ). Thank you. SharabSalam (talk) 03:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  • You would be well advised to self-revert your last edit to Tulsi Gabbard, lest you be blocked for violating 1RR. —C.Fred (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
    C.Fred, I have done it. I hope someone else can take that clearly unnecessary tag off though. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to comment on House of Representatives electionsEdit

Edit keeps being removed, even after I added an independent sourceEdit


I have been trying to add some information, regarding Declared Democratic candidate Hal Shouse, on the page.

The first time, you removed my edit, because you said it lacked an independent source. So, I re-added the information, and added the citation to the following source: Here is a link to that edit: Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you consider an independent source, but that seems pretty solid, to me. He has registered his candidacy, with the FEC. He has an active political campaign.

The edits to this page are the first time I have attempted to make any edits on Wikipedia. I appreciate any help you can provide.

Thank you, Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23Mike (talkcontribs) 16:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

23Mike, we need a reliable, secondary source, which is not an FEC filing. Many people file with the FEC and then do not run. No source is presented in the article. Also, if you are also editing with the account Bigreddwon, you need to stop, because it is sock puppetry. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok. I can cite a news article, if that counts as a secondary source. Bigreddwon is not my account. It is my client. When he saw that his information was removed, he attempted to re-add it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23Mike (talkcontribs) 16:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

I am Bigreddwon, I am the candidate, Harold Shouse. That is a screen name I have used for decades. I keep re-posting it because you keep deleting it. Not only have I filed with the FEC but I have filed my personal financial disclosures and I am actively campaigning. I don’t know what else you require to prove that I’m a candidate. Bigreddwon (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

My info keeps being deletedEdit

I'm running for US Senate and my information on the Wiki page about the election keeps being deleted. I'm registered as a legitimate candidate through the FEC. The FEC IS THE ONLY place that MATTERS in reference to who IS and ISNT a candidate. YOU can go there and put my name in and CONFIRM that I AM a candidate, why is that NOT good enough? What ELSE, if the OFFICIAL federal regulating body isn't good enough do you consider GOOD enough?? Very frustrating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigreddwon (talkcontribs) 20:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


He just signed a 9 year contract and the information on his wikipedia page is outdated. he is no longer a free agent[1]. please change this information or remove the protection so that his information can be updated to reflect his current team and position.Please and thank you. And if I am in the wrong please forgive me... But it's all over the internet. He is no longer a free agent. thank you for your time sir.Jarmusic2 (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)jarmusic2Jarmusic2 (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Miklós Palencsár's pageEdit

Hello Muboshgu, I hope you are doing well.

I would like your help about Miklós Palencsar's deleted page. It's been 5 years the page was on without any problems.

What can I do to get back the page? Could you help me ?

Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alencar.rossoni (talkcontribs) 21:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotEdit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
974   Danny Phantom (talk) Add sources
39   Prime Country (talk) Add sources
1,099   Sweating sickness (talk) Add sources
57   Kate Marshall (talk) Add sources
11   2004 Baseball Hall of Fame balloting (talk) Add sources
27   Maggie's List (talk) Add sources
643   CVS Health (talk) Cleanup
84   Cameron Maybin (talk) Cleanup
91   Camara Phyllis Jones (talk) Cleanup
306   2018 United States Senate election in Texas (talk) Expand
17   Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (talk) Expand
287   California State University, Chico (talk) Expand
4,513   Mike Pence (talk) Unencyclopaedic
46   Progressive Change Campaign Committee (talk) Unencyclopaedic
884   HIV/AIDS in the United States (talk) Unencyclopaedic
802   Governor (United States) (talk) Merge
393   Transylvania University (talk) Merge
540   Fake news website (talk) Merge
81   Criticism of the Food and Drug Administration (talk) Wikify
43   Otis Bowen (talk) Wikify
127   Prescription Drug User Fee Act (talk) Wikify
3   Luciana Borio (talk) Orphan
3   Kelly McQueen (talk) Orphan
3   Sin Perdón (talk) Orphan
53   2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Indiana (talk) Stub
29   Mihai Constantinescu (talk) Stub
26   Wandy Peralta (talk) Stub
10   Enderson Franco (talk) Stub
148   Wisconsin's 7th congressional district (talk) Stub
196   2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Gerrit Cole Is no longer a Free Agent, per ESPN.Com Plese remove the Protection so we can Fix this Or Plese update this information as it is outdaded and HE IS NO NONGER A FREE AGENT, BUT A NEW YORK YANKEE. The whole world knows it but you. Jarmusic2 (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)jarmusic2Jarmusic2 (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Frank Robinson GA nomination requestEdit

Would you be willing to nominate the Frank Robinson page as a Good Article? I only have time for small edits like proofreading and I haven't really worked on his article nor do I have enough wiki experience. I just noticed the page had been nominated way back in 2006 and it has seemed to be improved quite a bit since then. You're one of the baseball editors I know of (Also, Yankees10 recommended to ask you instead of him), so that's what led me here to ask. Thanks, no matter what you decide. Persistent Corvid (talk) 05:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Muboshgu".