Open main menu
Wikipe-tan the Library of Babel.png

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 13:39, 19 August 2019 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Contents

Re: Today's Featured ArticleEdit

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Deeday-UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Portals tasks requests: presented in the newsletter below...Edit

WikiCup 2018 November newsletterEdit

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is   Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1.   Courcelles (submissions)
  2.   Kosack (submissions)
  3.   Kees08 (submissions)
  4.   SounderBruce (submissions)
  5.   Cas Liber (submissions)
  6.   Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7.   Iazyges (submissions)
  8.   Ceranthor (submissions)


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

WikiCup 2019 March newsletterEdit

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  •   L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  •   Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  •   MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  •   Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  •   Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  •   Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019Edit

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

EngvarB QEdit

What's the matter with EngvarB? I haven't heard of any problems with it before. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Per template:EngvarB: An article tagged with one of the specific language templates must never be changed to {{EngvarB}}. There is no legitimate reason to do so. {{EngvarB}} is a cleanup template applied by bots to articles where the national variety of English cannot be automatically determined from the text. It signals to bots that the variety is unknown, and they will add according to their own defaults. The idea is that the article maintainers should go through the article, remove the anomalous spellings, and tag it with the correct variety of English. Per WP:ENGVAR, once this is done, the bots and human editors must respect the specified variety of English. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Wish I'd found out about this sooner, I've used it as a tidy-up device. I thought that it was a newer version of the BritEng tag. ah well, you live and you learn. Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-29Edit

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball)Edit

 On 17 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Isabel Martin was one of the Australian Devils who won silver at the 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship in Suphan Buri, Thailand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World ChampionshipEdit

 On 17 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Isabel Martin was one of the Australian Devils who won silver at the 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship in Suphan Buri, Thailand? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for NASA Astronaut Group 2Edit

 On 18 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NASA Astronaut Group 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that six of the Next Nine astronauts flew to the Moon, and three walked on it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NASA Astronaut Group 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, NASA Astronaut Group 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for NASA Astronaut Group 3Edit

 On 20 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NASA Astronaut Group 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that four of the fourteen astronauts in NASA Astronaut Group 3 were killed in training accidents before they had a chance to fly in space? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NASA Astronaut Group 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, NASA Astronaut Group 3), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Michael Collins (astronaut)Edit

 On 21 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michael Collins (astronaut), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Michael Collins (pictured), the command module pilot for Apollo 11, was the first person to perform two spacewalks in a single mission? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Collins (astronaut). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Michael Collins (astronaut)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-30Edit

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK stats for Michael Collins (astronaut)Edit

Hi, you have to wait another day to record the July 21 page views for this page, since that formula which deducts the pageviews on the days before and after needs to be implemented. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kerstin von LingenEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Kerstin von Lingen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kim Post (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project RoverEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project Rover you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project RoverEdit

The article Project Rover you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Project Rover for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Neil DaveyEdit

 On 27 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Neil Davey, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Stephen 22:28, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Volunteers Decoration ribbon.pngEdit

 

The file File:Volunteers Decoration ribbon.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics scheduled for TFAEdit

This is to let you know that Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 19 August 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 19, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 15:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh. It's the only Paralympic featured article, and I was hoping that it could be run during the 2020 Paralympics in Tokyo. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the article, with "drama and controversy, triumph and heartbreak" - and for that steady flow of GAs below, amazing! I have a peer review open btw. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-31Edit

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019Edit

Your GA nomination of NERVAEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NERVA you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 2Edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 5Edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 3Edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Will you run for administrator?Edit

Hi Hawkeye I've kept an eye on you (as you know) for a while and I think you'd make a fine admin. Would you consider running? Any talk-page stalkers who are interested in co-nominating, please speak up. I'm always happy to share. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I would very much like to run. I appreciate your confidence in me. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Great. I'll start working on an RfA page over the next few days. It won't be done in a hurry. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
There's no rush. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I would be very happy to co-nom, Dweller, but would happily step aside if someone with greater credibility was to offer. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Happy to have you and anyone else. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

The RfA is beginning to take shape at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hawkeye7 3. Anyone wishing to co-nom can add their nominations. Please don't participate in any other way yet. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Might a hatting be in order?Edit

Hi Hawkeye7,

I was surprised at the tone of this response to you. My thought is that we were informative, but that you were not reciprocated by the asker. I am prepared to hat this whole thing, but I suspect that you are easygoing about it. Probably we could let this all pass, in silence.

But I could act. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 23:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-32Edit

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 2Edit

The article NASA Astronaut Group 2 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 3Edit

The article NASA Astronaut Group 3 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Rose HollermannEdit

 On 12 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rose Hollermann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rose Hollermann (pictured) was the youngest player on the Team USA women's wheelchair basketball team at the 2016 Summer Paralympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rose Hollermann. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rose Hollermann), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Nominating you for adminEdit

--Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-33Edit

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Nope nope nopeEdit

I don't agree one bit with your last revert : not only are you deleting valuable information, that was correctly accompanied with a citation needed tag, but your reasons are shady.

Editors are forbidden from adding unsourced material.

I didn't see the forbidden part anywhere in the guidelines, especially when it was clearly written that a citation was needed. And ultimately, since information is lost by your revert and the article linked was very explanatory of the subject, that falls for me in IAR.

Unsourced material in not allowed at all in A-classd articles. 

Wikipedia:Content assessment: "It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources." Don't see the not allowed either.

Last thing : I already corrected a non negligeable amount of information in this article just by looking in the official decrees. That is strange for a good article. So, I revert back.

CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

WP:V: Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. How about just finding a source?
I was going to ask you if you would be interested in co-nominating the article for FAC?
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

RfA and edit summariesEdit

I am not sure what's going on but the Xtools edit summaries report does give you the mainspace edit summary usage of 46.7% for all mainspace edits, and 45.6% for major mainspace edits. Nsk92 (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Looking at your article space edits from today, I do see quite a few edits that in the edit history appear as not having edit summaries. E.g. [16] [17][18] [19][20] [21] [22][23][24][25][26]. All of these edits have a notation "Tag: PHP7". I am not sure if the tag has any significance, as plenty of your other edits, with edit summaries, have the same tag. Still, it is possible that something related PHP7 to is not working right. Nsk92 (talk) 00:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
They all have edit summaries. The first one is "Safety tests", the second is "Biography". I don't know what the tag means. My preferences have "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" set. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Those aren't edit summaries. They are pre-existing section headers. If an edit is made without an edit summary, it is shown in the edit history by a greyed-out section header. E.g. this edit that I just made here on my own user page [27]. The same is true for all of your edits whose diffs I listed above. ""Biography", "Safesty tests", etc are section headers that were already there before, prior to your edits. When a new section is created by an edit, it is shown in the edit history by its new greyed-out name followed by bright black phrase "new section", e.g. here [28]. Nsk92 (talk) 10:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
The sections have been added by my edits. The editor preferences setting regards them as edit summaries. If we want to regard them as otherwise, then the editor preferences will need to be changed first. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
It does not matter who created the section originally. When you made the edits linked in the diffs in my original post above, all the sections that you mention already existed in these articles. The "Safety tests" section in the "Project Rover" article, for example, was created by you on August 8 in this edit [29]. But in this edit of yours of August 12[30] the section had already existed for several days, and your edit did not include an edit summary. Note that if a section had already existed in an article prior to a particular edit, the greyed-out name of that section is always shown by the system in the edit history log, regardless of whether the edit was manual or automatic. An actual edit summary, if it is included at all, is always shown in bright black. Nsk92 (talk) 11:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Note that this point is explicitly explained in Help:Edit summary#Section editing and Help:Edit summary#Automatic summaries. Nsk92 (talk) 11:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Pedantic note: the section name is not "always shown", even if you click the "edit section" button. It's just inserted into the edit summary as a default. It can be added, removed or altered (as I'm doing in this edit). It's no less a part of the "actual edit summary" then any other code which the system automatically formats (e.g. blue links). — Bilorv (talk) 23:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes, the edit summary counters don't count the automated summaries, while the preference does. It is a bit inconsistent (and maybe there should be a feature request for extended preferences). The auto summaries that state which section you are editing are better than nothing, but of course not as good as really describing what you do by hand. —Kusma (t·c) 11:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Timing is everything?Edit

I don't usually look at RFA, so missed the start. I'm not going to post at this point, but would like you to know that what I said in 2016 still holds. Risker (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Risker I think having an Arb who voted for the desysop to add their voice to NYB who opposed it, would be valuable. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Just thanks for all the great work you do around here. Among others, I happened to read/enjoy the Buzz Aldrin article recently, after seeing First Man (not the most flattering portrayal, I imagine, but oh well). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Albert Kesselring featured article reviewEdit

Hi, I note that you've notified MILHIST about the FARC: [31]. Could you please notify the rest of the projects listed at the top of the nomination: WP History; WP Germany; etc: Wikipedia:Featured article review/Albert Kesselring/archive1? --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I have notified WP Biography, Germany, MilHist and Aviation, the four projects that have declared that the article is in their scope. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Harold FingerEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Harold Finger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thincat (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm probably being a bit fussy and it may not strictly be a DYK matter anyway. I'll keep watching and give a tick asap. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 5Edit

The article NASA Astronaut Group 5 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 5 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 07:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019Edit

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


RfAEdit

Thanks for making yourself available. These ordeals are not for the faint of heart. Being desysopped was a major hurdle but not an insurmountable one. Reflect upon the comments (some are helpful some are not) and remember that the majority supported your RFA. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

I second that. Deb (talk) 13:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I would vote for you again tomorrow, but I don't know how long it will take before you can get consensus. As you well know, 98% of most admin's contributions do not require the bit. --rogerd (talk) 17:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Sad to see the outcome, Hawkeye. You would make a great admin (again). Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-34Edit

15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer ParalympicsEdit

Hello.

Instead of repeatedly making the same change, maybe you should propose changing the article names – especially since you think there's a grammatical error.

Cheers.

HandsomeFella (talk) 08:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History ProjectEdit

  The Military history A-Class cross
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class cross for Apollo 11, Buzz Aldrin, Michael Collins (astronaut), Elliot See, and 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)


DYK for Harold FingerEdit

 On 22 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harold Finger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1960s, Harold Finger was in charge of the development of NASA's nuclear rocket and nuclear power systems, including generators left on the Moon by Apollo missions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harold Finger. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Harold Finger), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Hawkeye7".