Rctgamer3
|
December 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page WODE has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/user/wodedev (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
February 2015 edit
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at FedEx Express Flight 80, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 13:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Pokemon edit
Hi there, thanks for correcting my error with forme/form on that Pokemon article. I checked the respective Pokemon's article to see if "forme" might be correct, but I guess I missed it (probably because I was assuming it was a typo and didn't check very thoroughly). I made several similar edits, which I'll revert - just wanted to save you the trouble, in case you might check. Cheers, Jessicapierce (talk) 02:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
This isn't new, it is part of a pattern, so I've finally decided to ask for a block but I'm not sure if I've asked in the right place and since he keeps changing address it is difficult to know if admins can do anything about it. Advice or help spotting any others that seem to fit the pattern would be appreciated. -- 109.76.149.62 (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Rumi Shishido edit
Ojamajo Doremi Na-i-sho is a television series. It aired on SkyPerfecTV. If it was an "OVA" then it would be released directly onto DVD, which it wasn't. The series was originally announced as an OVA before it was turned into a television series. The official website even lists it as a television series in its URL: http://www.toei-anim.co.jp/tv/doremi_n/ lullabying (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, I noticed you've been changing it back to "OVA" without discussing in this edit summary. As previously stated the series is not an OVA anymore since it was aired on television. It was originally announced as one before it was turned into a TV series. lullabying (talk) 03:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
@Lullabying: That's because it is one. You're the only one here that thinks it isn't. Japanese Wikipedia page also lists it as an OVA. [1]
前述のとおり、DVD発売に先行してスカイパーフェクTVでの放送が行われたほか、各話のフォーマットに従前のシリーズと同様の形式が取られているためTVシリーズとして扱われることがあるが、元々はTV放送を前提としないOVAとして企画・製作された作品である。ただ、地上波でもDVD発売のCMが流れたことがある。なお、海外ではテレビ放送されずに、OVAとして扱われる事が多いが、韓国、イタリアでは日本と同様、テレビ放送をされていた[58]。
Translated: "As mentioned above, in addition to the broadcast on Sky PerfecTV prior to the DVD release, the format of each talk is taken as a TV series [episode] because it takes the same format as the previous series, It was originally planned and produced as OVA which does not assume TV broadcasting. However, even on terrestrial broadcasting, there was a commercial release of DVD release. In addition, abroad, it was treated as OVA without being televised, but in Korea and Italy it was telecasting as well as in Japan [58]."
So, Naisho was produced as an OVA and was scheduled to release as such, but Sky PerfecTV decided to air it before the DVD released. Take it up with the people on the Japanese Wikipedia article first before you change it back to it not being an OVA. Rctgamer3 (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- My bad, I just read an editorial by PASH! that calls it an OVA: http://www.pashplus.jp/anime/130427/ I really wouldn't use Japanese Wikipedia as a source, though. lullabying (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "おジャ魔女どれみ", Wikipedia (in Japanese), 2019-02-22, retrieved 2019-03-11
First off edit
I told you my account has been hacked and stop sending me these messages Rockercar32 (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
@Rockercar32: Your account security is your responsibility, this includes any of your contributions, "hacked" or not. Not my problem. Rctgamer3 (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Like I said stop leaving me these messages if you guys can't delete and chastise the ones on here making fake articles that have been up for YEARS with no sources and plain editing. Then you no reason to be talking to me until you get that together don't message me again I been on here way longer than you I know how this works. Deuces Rockercar32 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
About your question in IRC edit
Hey, you left just before I finished typing my answer. Anyway, you can request a page delete on the redirect under "G6: make way for page move", then move the page. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WelpThatWorked (talk • contribs) 19:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Using amiibo vs. Amiibo edit
I suggest you look at the Amiibo page and that everything should NOT be lowercase! Get consensus about it first. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Witchy Precure talkpage edit
I don't mind discussing things over with other users, but when they preface the topic with such hostility, calling my edits "stupid" simply because they don't like it, I honestly don't think they deserve any respect. Especially since that complaint is prefaced with a blatantly ignorant POV on the site's guidelines and MOS. I have no interest in having my editing privileges revoked due to a blatantly lying newb who claims to have multiple undeclared accounts, so I'm taking it here. I do believe respect is a two way street, and that I have done absolutely nothing to warrant this kind of harassment in the talkpage. Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Marie & Gali moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Marie & Gali, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:59, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marie&Gali.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Marie&Gali.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Manga edit
Category:Manga is a a subcategory of Category:Comics, and the beginnings and endings categories apply to manga as well. Dimadick (talk) 07:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC) @Dimadick: Might be, but I don't see how this would be relevant for a single manga of each Precure series mostly following the exact same plot as their anime counterpart. Anime comes first, manga spinoffs are released later. I only see a ton of actual comics, like Marvel and whatnot, and actual comic series. According to your reasoning, any anime ever that had an accompanying manga would fall under a comics beginning/start category, which I don't see happening. Are you going to update the thousands of other anime articles as well? I don't see how that would be beneficial. Rctgamer3 (talk) 10:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
I update them when I come across them. Categories should not be limited to American comics.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie & Gali has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~Kvng (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Star Twinkle Precure edit
I noticed you un-did my edit, it's per "Star Twinkle Precure". The reason is on this talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuteDolphin712 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Good luck edit
Unexplained page move edit
So is this. No other site in the world except Wikipedia is calling that show that name. ミラP 14:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- I know. Toei USA names it like this, i don't like it either. http://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html - Something to do with official sources. I very much the Japanese name myself. By the way, I'm going to move the page to PreCure instead of Pretty Cure, your move was fine but it was moved to Pretty instead of Pre. If you want to start a discussion on fixing these names, go ahead, i'll join. Rctgamer3 (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Healing Good Pretty Cure edit
Sure you do like to piss off my guts do you? Because those so called "episode reveals" are from magazines scans and always falls to questionable 3rd party sources, even if you do believe they're true. It is better NOT to add them on an episode list that would throw curve balls all the time since we can't predict which episodes are to air next. People are steering clear from leaks these days because "they never want to get spoiled no matter what". You also need to behave also since we can only trust official episode listings from Toei themselves and with the recent series licensed, we can no longer rely on magazine scans for episodes. Just stop being too ignorant over the issue, this is how things are moving forward these days. You don't like it, don't even try.--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 10:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Regardless of the episodes up for discussion, I'm treating this as a personal attack, I find your wording of your message not acceptable. You need to calm down. Rctgamer3 (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
That I stop massively changing the pages that I have removed? edit
Dude, I do not understand why you do not want me to remove the term voice actor if it is not constructive, it is that I realize that when I see all the articles related to seiyus for example it makes me very concerned that the introduction of the paragraph the terms actor and voice actor is uncomfortable because I thought that you were going to revert en masse without there being a change of material in just combining, an example that leaves my edit summary on Ryūsei Nakao's page right here and before separate it, I changed the term from actor and singer to voice artist, well, you understand me, but it is not necessary to remove them or change categories that I order alphabetically and you also removed the short description that I have carefully placed and the question is if there is any way to solve this peacefully if the terms can at least be left the same term. 148.0.112.44 (talk) 20:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Who says voice artist is more fitting than voice actors. Provide sources? The main articles are about voice ACTORS/ACTRESSES, voice artists is an uncommon term. I have more problems with you (assuming you're also that random other IP-editor) combining pages of (primarily) voice actors as actors, as being a VA and being an actor in itself means different things, and thus should not be listed that way in the short wikipage desc. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- but you just linked it and placing occupations in the short description 1 with your reversals. 148.0.112.44 (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- So? Quoting SNUGGUMS: "I personally would just recommend using "voice actor" or "voice actress" for people whose performances are almost entirely voice roles or exclusively those". Either go with voice actor if that's their main occupation. I just don't understand why you would suddenly introduce an obscure term. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Because I just did not understand anything you just told me, these tips that SNUGGUMS gave about Japanese voice actors in particular should be checked the number of people in Japanese Wikipedia a number of roles in series and live-action movies instead to add news references to each of them, it is also impossible for who adds or creates a page of series and movies but apparently not all believe that they have a minimum of minor or secondary appearances, which is so in that if they left it already I do not want to alter the order and I wage an edition war with you because if I do not resolve this dispute, we are going to be in a big mess. 148.0.112.44 (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand your reply. Please answer my question. Why are you introducing obscure terms? Also, I meant that he point of that actor project discussion was that there seemed to be consensus to only use their primary field of work in the short-wikidesc of each individual article. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Because I thought I was going to separate the term well-known actor and voice actor for something that was not of my interest, meanwhile, I wanted to do something like that by putting a separate occupation (see here), what I said in the previous conversation I did not know how to answer you with sincerity just by introducing a lot of obscure nonsense terms with mistakenly changing the term voice artist if it doesn't work for me. 148.0.112.44 (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand your reply. Please answer my question. Why are you introducing obscure terms? Also, I meant that he point of that actor project discussion was that there seemed to be consensus to only use their primary field of work in the short-wikidesc of each individual article. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Because I just did not understand anything you just told me, these tips that SNUGGUMS gave about Japanese voice actors in particular should be checked the number of people in Japanese Wikipedia a number of roles in series and live-action movies instead to add news references to each of them, it is also impossible for who adds or creates a page of series and movies but apparently not all believe that they have a minimum of minor or secondary appearances, which is so in that if they left it already I do not want to alter the order and I wage an edition war with you because if I do not resolve this dispute, we are going to be in a big mess. 148.0.112.44 (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- So? Quoting SNUGGUMS: "I personally would just recommend using "voice actor" or "voice actress" for people whose performances are almost entirely voice roles or exclusively those". Either go with voice actor if that's their main occupation. I just don't understand why you would suddenly introduce an obscure term. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- but you just linked it and placing occupations in the short description 1 with your reversals. 148.0.112.44 (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Top5a has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Thank you for all your hard work at maintaining pages and fighting against vandalism! Enjoy a cookie! --Top5a (talk) 01:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
UVB-76 edit
i did not remove any template, also, i did explain my edits. Edit: i pasted the citations to the infobox to cite the second frequency, i did not know it removed it on the text. thanks for pointing that out.
A kitten for you! edit
sorry if i gave you a hard time, i have a little kitty to cheer you up.
SomeWhatLife (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
it's buzzing edit
UVB-76 is buzzing (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOq9Nn03PhA). I don't think we should make any changes to the article based on you tube, particularly a live feed. IF the channel marker changes we need to wait until someone has written about it. We don't break news here. Secretlondon (talk) 20:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon: I never watch those YouTube clips tbh without checking the real deal. I've listened to 4625 on the University of Twente (Netherlands)' WebSDR thing on various occasions yesterday to verify and there was no buzzer to be heard, that's for sure. At least that deserves a remark on the page. I clipped some audio too. 'Least the buzzer is back again. There's a lot of pirate interference going on now, that's for sure. Rctgamer3 (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- We can't comment without sources. If it's not been written about by independent sources it didn't happen, as least as far as we are concerned. Secretlondon (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Conservation of Reverted Edits edit
Hey, this is KusumaSPMTickford. Sorry if this happened to me before. Actually I've written an edit on PreCure because it is based on theory and facts, but why do you even reverted. Due to the change in the official premiere date. Maybe it was earlier if you had rejected the edit. Please, don't reject other people's wikipedia edits without asking first. Because this is based on the law and policies, then I forgive completely. Please reply to this message if you change your mind or if you want to ask about the phrase. KusumaSPMTickford (talk) 01:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Your edits were reverted because they were considered not to be non-constructive. Did you plan on counting Reiwa dates for the next 50 seasons? /s - There's a point, one full season before and after when these Reiwa period counts really don't add anything to the article. Link MOS otherwise. As for the networks, all of these stations are covered by ANN. No need to duplicate data. Rctgamer3 (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
But I'm just making improvements. Did you know, BaldiBasicsFan deleted the description of the article?. I fixed it again and then deleted it again, even though the description of the article in the Reiwa era was actually quite old, not the current one. The actual data is the same, the franchise is still alive if can the Japanese era transition again in the future. KusumaSPMTickford (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
AIV report on 121.99.190.99 edit
I know it might be how Huggle does it, but try to avoid reporting IPs as VOAs or NOTHERE, as they cannot be blocked indefinitely except in rare circumstances, like what ArbCom ordered for Scientology. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Thanks for the message. What's the best way to report these, then; WP:ANI? Rctgamer3 (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
About yesterday. edit
I want to ask you. What is ANN?
Is there an ANN Channel?, The answer is no.
ANN is an affiliated program. Do you watch the Precure series on Japanese television?
If you only put the ANN label on it, later those who want to watch will be confused if you are looking for TV channels to watch Precure
So, that's why I added information on TV Asahi (Kantō), ABC TV (Kansai) and metele/Nagoya TV (Chubu) channels after ANN's word letter. Make it easier to find KusumaSPMTickford (talk) 23:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- ANN is a network of TV stations. Adding individual stations is overkill. Rctgamer3 (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
No man. TV Asahi, ABC TV, Metele (Nagoya TV) are affiliated by ANN. Should you don't reject of latest edit for i'm going refixed that. 😡 KusumaSPMTickford (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Hatsune Miku edit
I think all the lyrics are now hidden. If you have any suggestions as to the reason that page is under attack can you comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Talk:Hatsune Miku. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, i don't have any further information on the subject, i only came across the repetitive spam on Talk:Hatsune_Miku recently. Thanks, i'll keep an eye on that page. Seems to be more widespread than i thought... Rctgamer3 (talk) 18:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)