Open main menu

User talk:Miraclepine

Active discussions
This user prefers to receive notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to him on other pages. No talkback messages are needed.


Judge Dredd articlesEdit

It's premature to delete or redirect articles before the 7 days are up, even if you think that will be the eventual outcome. People are entitled to the full time to object to the removal of prodded articles if they want to. Richard75 (talk) 23:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

I don't agree that these are valid redirect yet -- they may well be, but that isn't the point. Another user prodded then for deletion, and by redirecting them so soon you didn't respect the process. I appreciate that they can't be prodded again, but with the greatest respect, you should have thought of that. Your remedy now is to nominate them for AfD. Richard75 (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@Richard75: This is why WP:BOLD exists. ミラP 16:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
WP:BOLD doesn't override all other policies and procedures. Richard75 (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Don't be impatient. Richard75 (talk) 23:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
@Richard75: I'm not. I'm just being clear that articles will not exist some of at those pages. ミラP 00:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
They exist right now, so it's premature to delete links to them. Richard75 (talk) 20:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
@Richard75: Not anymore. 7 deletions in 36 hours. ミラP 17:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I think you'll find that 2 December was more than 36 hours ago. Richard75 (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
@Richard75: I meant within a period of 36 hours. ミラP 20:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Please read WP:SOFTDELETEEdit

Not many people follow the guideline but as you are not an administrator please don't relist discussions like this. Thanks in advance, J947(c), at 04:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

@J947: Oh, my mistake. But there was a keep vote after the relist. ミラP 16:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Funny I was bothered by the out of policy relist there too - given that there was a keep vote I felt compelled to relist again, though I would suggest the ends don't justify the means. I then found Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Akiniymika. Your relisting statement is again incorrect (we don't need any !votes to decide what to do ) and that article to would have been eligible for soft delete. This one had two subsequent delete !votes so I went ahead and closed it, in keeping with policy, as a delete. If you are going to relist discussions (and know that I am on the record as disliking this long before I became a sysop myself) I would ask that you need to better familiarize yourself with appropriate policy. I would also ask that you give thought to relist bias and consider abstaining from relist until you decide to go for RfA (which based on your userbox seems unlikely and fair enough). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Miraclepine".