template:rp in TFatWS articlesEdit

Do you know why {{rp}} is used in Truth (The Falcon and the Winter Soldier) instead of the relevant cite template parameters? --Gonnym (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, because we are using the ref "EndCredits" to cite content from three locations: the main on-end credits for the starring actors, the actual credits list, and then the VFX vendors of the episode. The citation is formatted to let readers know at what time the credits start in the episode, with {{rp}} being used for the specific time stamps, much like citing a specific page number. As there is no timestamp template serving a similar function, {{rp}} has been the most useful. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
So I'm assuming that the reason not to use {{Cite episode}} |minutes is so you won't have 3 references for the same item that differ only in the minutes? I can understand that, though to be honest, with only 25 sources in that page, 2 more wouldn't be really cluttering it. --Gonnym (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes exactly. We're pulling the info from the same source, so why duplicate it multiple times? That's my view on it anyways. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Assistance RequestedEdit

I could really use your help and/or the help of someone more knowledgeable on Wikipedia's rules than me if possible. I'm currently in the middle of a light conflict with an editor over whether there should be an "antagonists" header in the Power Rangers Dino Fury character page for a group of antagonists who aren't stated to be part of a named organization or group. My argument is that it isn't necessary because it should already be obvious in the antagonists' information. Their argument is that most of the previous Power Rangers series' pages have it, and thus, so should the Dino Fury page. I know this subject might be out of your wheelhouse compared to the pages you normally work on, but I could really use some advice on how to proceed and I want nothing more than to put an end to this before things get worse. If you are unable to, then perhaps you could direct me to someone who might be able to. Either way, please respond when you can. Blazewing16 (talk) 02:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:ANTAGONIST and WP:OSE are what you probably want to look at. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Franchise usage at MCU list articlesEdit

The infoboxes at List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series and List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films have been bugging me for a while. Neither usage is what the template is for (film or TV series), but a sort-of-franchise usage with needs that the current franchise template does not offer. I was thinking of maybe creating a new infobox that would allow these pages to have a similar look. I've created simple examples at User:Gonnym/sandbox/franchise based on what is currently in use in those articles (I've split the TV one into two, as almost the entire usage was split, which really begs for the infobox to be split as well). Care to look and offer any thoughts? --Gonnym (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey, talk-page stalker here. Perhaps this proposal can be brought to Talk:Marvel Cinematic Universe, the central article, in order for more eyes to see it. —El Millo (talk) 00:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
@Gonnym: My only issue with creating specific templates would be, are there other articles that would benefit from it? I feel like yes to a film one perhaps, but not so for TV series? Otherwise, could the film and tv infoboxes simply be modified, or use "child" coding to get the desired result. I also personally don't see an issue as they are now, but am not against changing it. (Also, I'm planning not to be as active for the next week or so, so apologies for any slow response.) - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
In the film franchise infobox, the only added parameter is |num_films=, which could easily be added to {{Infobox film}}. —El Millo (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Favre1fan93, Marvel's ABC television series, Marvel's Netflix television series, Marvel's young adult television series, Adventure into Fear (franchise), List of Star Wars films, List of Star Wars television series, Sony Pictures Universe of Marvel Characters and potentially DC Extended Universe and Arrowverse (from those that I can think of, but I'm sure there are more). @Facu-el Millo, I'd be opposed to adding any non-film parameter to the film infobox. Code should be used correctly and not abused. It might work fine in the MCU articles, but by adding it you open up a lot of protentional misuses. This is similar to the current situation, where the film and TV infoboxes are misused here with, for example, pseudo headers such as "Total". And just to repeat what I said earlier, a reader viewing both the film and TV lists shouldn't experience a completely different infobox style when both serve basically the same thing. --Gonnym (talk) 13:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
DCEU and Arrowverse should keep {{Infobox media franchise}}, so really, it's mostly the MCU lists and Star Wars lists. My opinion then is I don't see the need really to create an entirely new infobox for these lists. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Wanda Maximoff's ImageEdit

Deriving from this.

Since AOU Wanda is old, Is it appropriate to change it now we have Wanda in her full glory as the Scarlet Witch in WandaVision? I've uploaded A new incarnation of the image (Too big and wrong license, though Milo could fix it). But I've decided to contact You since your one of the people I work alongside with during most of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier's episode articles. It also would be cropped to showcase only Wanda, Thanks! ChannelSpider (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

ChannelSpider, I got this. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Oh ok. ChannelSpider (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Kailash29792. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Agents of SHIELD and Agent Carter not canonEdit

I know this isn't the best source, but do you think this info should be monitored? Kailash29792 (talk) 03:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Here's Comicbook.com talking about the same topic. —El Millo (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
It is something that could probably be mentioned at the list of TV shows in the development section, but I don't think we should be saying they aren't canon or anything. The wording at the different TV series articles is still correct I feel. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't think there's much too this. It is indeed "Legacy" content when compared to what Marvel Studios is doing. Doesn't mean it isn't canon, since the Marvel TV shows never fit nicely in the Phases anyways. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)