![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (3 threads) |
---|
Bots noticeboard (6 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (3 threads) |
---|
Original research noticeboard (10 threads) |
---|
External links noticeboard (5 threads) |
---|
Conflict of interest noticeboard (13 threads) |
---|
Dispute resolution noticeboard (2 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Media copyright questions (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (8 threads) |
---|
|}
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- 2600:1700:c0:44c0:d02d:e7f3:4774:fbd1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Tripped 10 abuse filters in the last 5 minutes: (details). DatBot (talk) 04:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Warned user. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- 217.165.243.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Tripped filter 793 (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). DatBot (talk) 06:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 07:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- 41.128.168.242 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Tripped 10 abuse filters in the last 5 minutes: (details). DatBot (talk) 08:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
User-reported
- User:Vaultralph (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) Not registered but using a name that hides IP. Persistingly deletes passages or sections in Mokshas or rolling back to obsolete info. ----Numulunj pilgae (talk) 07:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- I see you have already posted this at ANI. I think the subject is best suited to a discussion there. PhilKnight (talk) 07:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Turkcell Vandal (see also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Turkcell vandal targeting Canibus related articles not much discussion has occurred at time of writing)
- 188.58.64.0/18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 77.67.160.0/19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 31.143.0.0/16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 176.89.0.0/16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 178.247.128.0/19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 176.227.0.0/18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 178.240.0.0/16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)
- 5.24.0.0/16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) Please block them. My recent contribs have been full of reverting these edits. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Rolltide689 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) – Resumption of exactly same pattern of editing that resulted in week's block for "disruptive editing, including failure to follow WP:MOS guidelines, edit-warring, and failure to respond to warnings". Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Gauravguptaofficial77 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Arloisadyke (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Webots (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used s instead of 5 attempting to skip filter: bot ?[0-9]*$. Violating string: webot5" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Name may imply an unauthorized bot. Do not block accounts in which the "bot" suffix arises naturally -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Being discussed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sumu.name (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- HeavenPregnantBunnyRabbitMarried (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Xxxxjeon (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Thestupidstudent12 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Abdullahali.ca (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Собачонка (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Username is Ukrainian and according to Google, translates to "Doggy". If that's accurate I highly doubt this is a username violation. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Urmom10101 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Frikenstin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Noahisdumb69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(is|was|are|were) ?(a|the)? ?dumb" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Computing Cloud (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "putin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to politician involved in invasion of Ukraine -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- SportPromotions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Franciscoeusebiogarciamartinez (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Homo Corwyna (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "homo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- RareUsername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yofk.nz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- ActuallyLukaDonicGQsports (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yvngdaadofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Vda9ihancdibjocadjobvadoj (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Wabpdbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Kuwertyuweeyopaeesdeeeff (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: kuwertyuweeyopaeesdeeephph" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- PandaSucksAtGames (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- IamdefinitelynotMoqwerty (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: iamdephinitelynotmoqwerty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Андерсмог (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
User-reported
- DashBookingInc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:CORPNAME, created Draft:Dash Booking. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Burwellfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a username that implies shared use. Special:Diff/1088576244. Helen(💬📖) 23:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Good Meat Project (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a username that implies shared use. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 00:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Urmumsmilk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- EasyParcel (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. EDM fan 2 (talk) 03:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Aleaitsolutions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. Shellwood (talk) 07:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators. Please change this notice to {{No admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Kadir Mısıroğlu
Reason: The page has already been silverlocked, because it has been subject to unsourced conspiracy addtions from a sockpuppet army (i.e. typical LTA). The sockmaster's new tactic is using IPs on the article's talk page for claiming that the article is "unbalanced" (since it doesn't depict the conspiracy theory nonsense as "facts"), and then using an autoconfirmed account for adding the undue weight template to the article. I suppose that the problem can only be resolved by Bluelocking the article. Best regads, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Qin Yi
Temporary semi-protection: Edit war on birth-date: there is an IP who vandalize the page every single day. Alienautic (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- The article has conflicting sources for her birthdate: This article says February 4, while this archived one says January 31st. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Alok Vaid-Menon
Reason: Persistent misgendering of a non-binary BLP. Request indefinite semi. Funcrunch (talk) 18:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Amad Diallo
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dr Salvus 18:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Addison Rae
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after protection was over, look protection history logs. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Moldova
Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE. Persistent disruptive editing. Curbon7 (talk) 22:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Holodomor genocide question
Reason: Requesting Extended confirmed protection given coordinated disruptive editing by what appear to be sock accounts (months old account with only a few edits and no history of prior engagement on topic pushing suddenly same talking points). Semi-protection would not work here given the particular accounts being used. CASalt (talk) 00:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Pokimane
Reason: Perennial vandalism as this subject is well known with a younger crowd. Seeking temporary protection as vandalism has spiked in recent days. BriefEdits (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Great Replacement
Reason: High level of IP vandalism/abuse. --Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Declined. The page is being massively edited, but I see only a few cases of IP vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 04:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Albert Vandal
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking and block evasion, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RussianFanboy2010. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Joe Locke (actor)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – repeated addition of unsourced BLP info. Joeyconnick (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Jabari Smith Jr.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IPs are vandalizing article (likely related to the draft.). Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Charles Leclerc
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SSSB (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hip-Hop for Sale
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Mind Control (Canibus album)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – turkcell vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Melatonin Magik
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Turkcell vandal. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 07:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Eric C. Conn
Reason: From what I could tell from what I could find of the original deletion of the article, it appears to me that it was originally deleted due to violation of WP:N. Conn is convicted of defrauding the United States Government in a massive conspiracy of half a billion dollars. He was the subject of a manhunt for more than six months from several federal law enforcement agencies, to include the Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When the original article was opened, he was merely a random attorney but has since crossed that threshold into being notable, in my opinion. There have been articles written about the man in major news sources, such as The Wall Street Journal, the Lexington Herald-Leader, and National Public Radio. Additionally, his fraud scheme was featured in an episode of CNBC's American Greed: Scams, Scoundrels and Scandals and a documentary series titled The Big Conn on Apple TV+ has been created outlining the scheme.
I don't want to go into the whole "whataboutism" but I could easily point out plenty of topics that exist on Wikipedia that are much less notable than Eric C. Conn. I assume that the original reason the page was deleted was that it was fashioned as a straight-up advertisement, but I feel there is enough to write a fairly sufficient Wikipedia article. I recently watched the AppleTV+ docuseries and wanted to know a little more about what happened, especially since I'm from that area and used to see his billboards all over the place "back home." When I noticed there was no article, I decided I'd go ahead and create it for anyone that might also be curious but ran into the "create-protected" block.
In fairness, I have no idea why the page was "create-protected" (a strange concept from my understanding of the mission/purpose of Wikipedia?), but I haven't been heavily involved in editing Wikipedia in a few years. Thank you for your time and careful consideration of this request. — HiB2Bornot2B talk Go Big Blue! 23:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- The page was originally protected in May 2007 by BorgQueen. Courtesy pinging BorgQueen for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Im obviously not her, buuuuut I would still like to give my input on this peculiar situation…A create-protect in 2007? Geez, even if the story was minor at the time, you’d think someone in FIFTEEN YEARS would’ve managed to hear about him and double checked. Or even an appropriately leveled admin could’ve gone and created the page. Not saying OP doesn’t deserve credit but geez it’s a shame it didn’t happen sooner. I CreecregofLife (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Your input is not required, CreecregofLife. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Did not know BorgQueen was still around. @HiB2Bornot2B: Maybe establish notability as a draft? That would strengthen the case for allowing creation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra. BorgQueen edited a couple of days ago but they do not edit frequently. It’s just a matter of courtesy to consult the protecting administrator; if we don’t get a response in a few days, I’ll go ahead and unprotect as I see no problem here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- I am happy to write up an article, and I even thought about doing so as you suggested as a draft but then I determined that I didn't really want to invest the time in the event that it doesn't get unprotected. — HiB2Bornot2B talk Go Big Blue! 23:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra. BorgQueen edited a couple of days ago but they do not edit frequently. It’s just a matter of courtesy to consult the protecting administrator; if we don’t get a response in a few days, I’ll go ahead and unprotect as I see no problem here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Did not know BorgQueen was still around. @HiB2Bornot2B: Maybe establish notability as a draft? That would strengthen the case for allowing creation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Your input is not required, CreecregofLife. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Im obviously not her, buuuuut I would still like to give my input on this peculiar situation…A create-protect in 2007? Geez, even if the story was minor at the time, you’d think someone in FIFTEEN YEARS would’ve managed to hear about him and double checked. Or even an appropriately leveled admin could’ve gone and created the page. Not saying OP doesn’t deserve credit but geez it’s a shame it didn’t happen sooner. I CreecregofLife (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Kathy Barnette
Reason: She lost the election, so there is little reason to believe the page will continue to get vandalized. Protecting the page for a year is definitely not needed any longer, and probably no protection is needed at all since she is no longer a candidate. Banana Republic (talk) 02:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Courtesy pinging El C, who installed the year-long semi-protection. But IMO that protection was fully justified and is still needed. She lost the election only yesterday, and she remains a highly visible and very controversial person. There is no reason to believe she will immediately fall off of everyone's radar the day after losing the primary. Maybe six months from now we can evaluate whether the protection is still needed.-- MelanieN (talk) 03:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Project_Veritas
In the "Purpose" field, replace "disinformation" with a term that describes the purpose of the page subject, thereby bringing the page out of violation of Wikipedia's defamation policy and demonstrating that Wikipedia administrators have not acted deliberately to maintain a statement plausibly known to be defamatory. 107.77.224.24 (talk) 04:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment: They selectively edit videos to make the people filmed look like they're saying things they didn't. Is there another word for that besides "disinformation"? Sumanuil. 05:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- We're not going to entertain inflammatory requests for this article, full stop. Even if Project Veritas hadn't made whitewashing their Wikipedia article a priority, this falls under the American politics discretionary sanctions regime. Anyone demanding edits in this manner would be either formally warned or (if they had been already) flat-out topic-banned or blocked. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC) |
5 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
---|
Account creator |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
AutopatrolledUser:Petewarrior
I have created 26 articles so far, and it would be great to have the next ones appearing on search engines more quickly. PetéWarrior (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
User:BastianMAT
Greetings, it’s been a few months since I last applied for the permissions. I have created many political articles since then and taken on the feedback from before. I have not faced any issues and received several thank you messages from users with some of my articles making it to ITNR. Considering this, I do feel like its the right time to submit this now. Wish you all a good day. BastianMAT (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Gardenkur
Myself a regular editor in Wikipedia and mainly involved in writing articles of public interest request this permission for getting these articles directly into search engine. I dont have any remarks in the content of my articles as I reference them from reliable sources. I wish to make Wikipedia a trustable platform for global readers by adding genuine content. Thanks in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 15:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Florificapis
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
ConfirmedUser:FozzieHey (test)
Hi, this is a test account of User:FozzieHey. I would like to test Ultraviolet on this account, but to use Ultraviolet you need confirmed. FozzieHey (test) (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC) |
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewerUser:Botu Yadav
I am the new user who is interested in Politics related articles more, i would like to request for the New Page Reviewer if i am eligibe for that. I saw people with less than my edits and creations are NPR so i wanted to request and i will work tirelessly after i become the NPR. Botu Yadav (talk) 03:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC) User:Gardenkur
Hi. With a regular editing experience in existing articles and writing new articles I could gain good knowledge of Wikipedia policies. Request permission to clear backlogs and make new articles suitable for Wikipedia platform. Gardenkur (talk) 06:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Gardenkur (talk) 06:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC) User:Darth Mike
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page moverUser: Qwerfjkl
Hi, I'd like to request page mover rights so that I can move categories, to help with the backlog at CfD (see User:Qwerfjkl/CSD log for some examples of my CfD work) (please User:Itcouldbepossible
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewerUser:Bgredmchn
Good track record, never been blocked, and have over 16,000 edits to the project with almost 600 of them in the last week. I understand policy and guidelines, and would like to help with backlogs and protect pages against vandalism. Brian (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Brian (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC) User:MrMeAndMrMe
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
RollbackUser:NotLance
Hi! I used to mainly edit/create articles before but I've been actively trying to fight vandalism for the past 4 days through recent changes. I presumably have over 500 edits now (excluding ones that are not related to anti-vandalism work). If I did an accidental revert, I would've revert it back again and would provide a summary to why I did that. Also, for the warns, sometimes I would not provide warns due to obvious vandalism, grammar error (typos) or I'm just not sure what warn type do I address. It would've be great if I can get rollback permissions so that I can further speed up the process of my edits by using a faster anti-vandalism tool. If I ever get denied & if you do believe that I should probably gain more experience and anti-vandalism activities for a few weeks then I'll continue doing it! NotLance (talk) 09:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Blazing Phoenix
Hi. I have been recent change patrolling for a long time, and I request rollback rights to revert vandalism. Blazing Phoenix (talk) 11:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Airtransat236
Hi i'm combatting a lot a vandalism and i would love to be a rollbacker beacause i love combatting vandalism! I am a lot active (especially on W-Ends) and i check recent changes almost every day. I have about 250 mainspace edits which makes me eligible. Thank you Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 15:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC) User:Mr Reading Turtle
|
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
)
|
|
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
Barnstars
|