The FGM-148 Javelin, or Advanced Anti-Tank Weapon System-Medium (AAWS-M), is an American-made portable anti-tank missile system in service since 1996, and continuously upgraded. It replaced the M47 Dragon anti-tank missile in US service. Its fire-and-forget design uses automatic infrared guidance that allows the user to seek cover immediately after launch, in contrast to wire-guided systems, like the system used by the Dragon, which require a user to guide the weapon throughout the engagement. The Javelin's high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warhead can defeat modern tanks by top attack, hitting them from above, where their armor is thinnest, and is also useful against fortifications in a direct attack flight.
|Place of origin||United States|
|Used by||See Operators|
|Designer||Texas Instruments & Martin Marietta (now Raytheon & Lockheed Martin)|
|Manufacturer||Raytheon & Lockheed Martin|
|Unit cost||US$216,717 (G-model missile only, FY2021)|
US$240,000 (missile only, export cost, FY2019)
US$249,700 (Lightweight CLU only, FY2021)
|No. built||45,000 missiles (12,000 CLUs)|
|Variants||See: § Variants|
|Length||1.1 m (43 in) (missile)|
|Barrel length||1.2 m (47 in)|
|Diameter||142 mm (5.6 in)|
|Crew||1 or 2|
|Calibre||127 mm (5.0 in)|
|Effective firing range|
|Sights||Optical sight & thermal imaging|
|Warhead weight||8.4 kg (19 lb)|
|Flight ceiling||150 m (490 ft) (top attack mode)|
60 m (200 ft) (direct-attack mode)
Javelin is a fire-and-forget missile with lock-on before launch and automatic self-guidance. The system takes a top-attack flight profile against armored vehicles, attacking the usually thinner top armor, but can also make a direct attack, for use against buildings, targets too close for top attack, targets under obstructions and helicopters.
It can reach a peak altitude of 150 m (490 ft) in top-attack mode and 60 m (200 ft) in direct-fire mode. Initial versions had a range of 2,000 m (6,600 ft), later increased to 2,500 m (8,200 ft). It is equipped with an imaging infrared seeker. The tandem warhead is fitted with two shaped charges: a precursor warhead to detonate any explosive reactive armor and a primary warhead to penetrate base armor.
The missile is ejected from the launcher to a safe distance from the operator before the main rocket motors ignite – a "soft launch arrangement". This makes it harder to identify the launcher, though backblast from the launch tube still poses a hazard to nearby personnel. The firing team may move as soon as the "fire-and-forget" missile has been launched, or immediately prepare to fire on their next target.
The missile system is sometimes carried by two soldiers consisting of a gunner and an ammunition bearer, although one soldier can fire it. While the gunner aims and fires the missile, the ammunition bearer scans for prospective targets, watches for threats like enemy vehicles or troops and ensures that personnel and obstacles are clear of the missile's launch backblast.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (February 2022)
In 1983, the United States Army introduced its AAWS-M (Advanced Anti-Tank Weapon System—Medium) requirement and, in 1985, the AAWS-M was approved for development. In August 1986, the proof-of-principle (POP) phase of development began, with a US$30 million contract awarded for technical proof demonstrators: Ford Aerospace (laser-beam riding), Hughes Aircraft Missile System Group (imaging infrared combined with a fiber-optic cable link) and Texas Instruments (imaging infrared). In late 1988, the POP phase ended and, in June 1989, the full-scale development contract was awarded to a joint venture of Texas Instruments and Martin Marietta (now Raytheon and Lockheed Martin). The AAWS-M received the designation of FGM-148.
|AAWS-M Candidates Fact Sheets|
In April 1991, the first test-flight of the Javelin succeeded, and in March 1993, the first test-firing from the launcher succeeded. In 1994, low levels of production were authorized, and the first Javelins were deployed with US Army units in 1996.
Test and evaluationEdit
Development test and evaluation is conducted to demonstrate the engineering design and development process is complete. It is used to reduce risk, validate, and qualify the design. It also ensures that the product is ready for government acceptance. The DT&E results are evaluated to ensure that design risks have been minimized and the system will meet specifications. Results are also used to estimate the system's military readiness when it is introduced into service. DT&E serves a critical purpose as it reduces the risks of hazards by testing selected high-risk components or subsystems. DT&E is the government developing agency tool used to confirm that the system performs as specified and that the system is ready for field testing.
DT&E is an iterative process of designing, building, testing, identifying deficiencies, fixing, retesting, and repeating. It is performed in the factory, laboratory, and on the proving ground by the contractors and the government. Contractor and government testing is combined into one integrated test program and conducted to determine if the performance requirements have been met and to provide data to the decision authority.
The General Accounting Office (GAO), since renamed Government Accountability Office, published a report questioning the adequacy of Javelin testing. The report, titled "Army Acquisition—Javelin Is Not Ready for Multiyear Procurement", opposed entering into full-rate production in 1997 and expressed the need for further operational testing due to the many redesigns undergone.
In 1995, Secretary of Defense William Perry had set forth five new operational test initiatives. These included: 1) getting operational testers involved early in development; 2) use of modeling and simulation; 3) integrating development and operational testing; 4) combining testing and training; and 5) applying concepts to demos and acquisitions.
The late-phase development of the Javelin retroactively benefited from the then new operational test initiatives set forth by the Secretary of Defense, as well as a further test conducted as a consequence of the Army's response to the GAO report. Before the Milestone III decision, and before fielding to 3rd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment at Fort Benning (also Army Rangers, Special Forces, airborne, air assault, and light infantry), the Javelin was subjected to limited parts of the five operational test and evaluation initiatives, as well as a portability operational test program (an additional test phase of the so-called Product Verification Test), which included live firings with the full-rate configuration weapon.
Per initiatives and as a DT&E function, the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) and the Defense Department's Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) became involved in three development test activities, including: 1) reviewing initial operational test and evaluation plans; 2) monitoring initial operational test and evaluation; and 3) structuring follow-on test and evaluation activities. The results of these efforts detected problems (training included) and corrected significant problems which led to modified test plans, savings in test costs, and GAO satisfaction.
The Javelin Environmental Test System (JETS) is a mobile test set for Javelin All-Up-Round (AUR) and the Command Launch Unit (CLU). It can be configured to functionally test the AUR or the CLU individually or both units in a mated tactical mode. This mobile unit may be repositioned at the various environmental testing facilities. The mobile system is used for all phases of Javelin qualification testing. There is also a non-mobile JETS used for stand-alone CLU testing. This system is equipped with an environmental chamber and is primarily used for Product Verification Testing (PRVT). Capabilities include: Javelin CLU testing; Javelin AUR testing; Javelin Mated Mode testing; Javelin testing in various environmental conditions; and CLU PRVT.
The all-up-round test sets include: extreme temperature testing; missile tracker testing (track rate error, tracking sensitivity); seeker/focal plane array testing (cool-down time, dead/defective pixels, seeker identification); pneumatic leakage; continuity measurements; ready time; and guidance sections (guidance commands, fin movement).
This section needs additional citations for verification. (February 2022)
The system consists of three main components: the Command Launch Unit, the Launch Tube Assembly and the missile itself.
Command Launch UnitEdit
The gunner carries a reusable Command Launch Unit, more commonly referred to as a CLU (pronounced "clue"), which is the targeting component of the two-part system. The CLU has three views which are used to find, target, and fire the missile and may also be used separately from the missile as a portable thermal sight. Infantry are no longer required to stay in constant contact with armored personnel carriers and tanks with thermal sights. This makes infantry personnel more flexible and able to perceive threats they would not otherwise be able to detect. In 2006, a contract was awarded to Toyon Research Corporation to begin development of an upgrade to the CLU enabling the transmission of target image and GPS location data to other units.
Day field of viewEdit
The first view is a 4× magnification day view. It is mainly used to scan areas in visible light during daylight operation. It is also used to scan following sunrise and sunset, when the thermal image is hard to focus due to the natural rapid heating and/or cooling of the Earth.
WFOV (wide field of view)Edit
The second view is the 4× magnification night view, and shows the gunner a thermal representation of the area viewed. This is also the primary view used due to its ability to detect infrared radiation and find both troops and vehicles otherwise too well hidden to detect. The screen shows a "green scale" view which can be adjusted in both contrast and brightness. The inside of the CLU is cooled by a small refrigeration unit attached to the sight. This greatly increases the sensitivity of the thermal imaging capability since the temperature inside the sight is much lower than that of the objects it detects.
Due to the sensitivity this causes, the gunner is able to "focus" the CLU to show a detailed image of the area being viewed by showing temperature differences of only a few degrees. The gunner operates this view with the use of two hand stations similar to the control stick found in modern cockpits. It is from this view that the gunner focuses the image and determines the area that gives the best heat signature on which to lock the missile.
NFOV (narrow field of view)Edit
The third field of view is a 12× thermal sight used to better identify the target vehicle. Once the CLU has been focused in WFOV, the gunner may switch to NFOV for target recognition before activating Seeker FOV.
Once the best target area is chosen, the gunner presses one of the two triggers and is automatically switched to the fourth view; the Seeker FOV, which is a 9x magnification thermal view. This process is similar to the automatic zoom feature on most modern cameras. This view is also available along with the previously mentioned views, all of which may be accessed with the press of a button. However, it is not as popular as a high magnification view takes longer to scan a wide area.
This view allows the gunner to further aim the missile and set the guidance system housed inside it. It is when in this view that information is passed from the CLU, through the connection electronics of the Launch Tube Assembly, and into the missile's guidance system. If the gunner decides not to fire the missile immediately, they can cycle back to the other views without firing. When the gunner is comfortable with the target picture, they pull the second trigger and establish a "lock”. The missile launches after a short delay.
The US Army developed a new CLU as an improvement over the Block I version. The new CLU is 70 percent smaller, 40 percent lighter, and has a 50 percent battery life increase. Features of the lightweight CLU are: a long-wave infrared (IR) thermographic camera; a high-definition display with improved resolution; integrated handgrips; a five megapixel color camera; a laser point that can be seen visibly or through IR; a far target locator using GPS, a laser rangefinder, a heading sensor, and modernized electronics. The LWCLU has also demonstrated the ability to fire an FIM-92 Stinger anti-aircraft missile, using its superior optics to identify and destroy small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
Launch Tube AssemblyEdit
Both the gunner and the ammunition bearer carry the Launch Tube Assembly, a disposable tube that houses the missile and protects the missile from harsh environments. The tube has built-in electronics and a locking hinge system that makes attachment and detachment of the missile to and from the Command Launch Unit a quick and simple process.
The Javelin missile's tandem warhead is a high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) type. This round utilizes an explosive shaped charge to create a stream of superplastically deformed metal formed from trumpet-shaped metallic liners. The result is a narrow high velocity particle stream that can penetrate armor.
The Javelin counters the advent of explosive reactive armor (ERA). ERA boxes or tiles lying over a vehicle's main armor explode when struck by a warhead. This explosion does not harm the vehicle's main armor, but causes steel panels to fly across the path of a HEAT round's narrow particle stream, disrupting its focus and leaving it unable to cut through the main armor. The Javelin uses two shaped-charge warheads in tandem. The weak, smaller diameter HEAT precursor charge detonates the ERA, clearing the way for the much larger diameter HEAT warhead, which then penetrates the target's primary armor.
A two-layered molybdenum liner is used for the precursor and a copper liner for the main warhead.
To protect the main charge from the explosive blast, shock, and debris caused by the impact of the missile's nose and the detonation of the precursor charge, a blast shield is used between the two charges. This was the first composite material blast shield and the first that had a hole through the middle to provide a jet that is less diffuse.
A newer main charge liner produces a higher velocity jet. While making the warhead smaller, this change makes it more effective, leaving more room for propellant for the main rocket motor, and thus increasing the missile's range.
Electronic arming and fusing, called Electronic Safe Arming and Fire (ESAF), is present on the Javelin. The ESAF system enables the firing and arming process to proceed, while imposing a series of safety checks on the missile. ESAF cues the launch motor after the trigger is pulled. When the missile reaches a key acceleration point (indicating that it has cleared the launch tube), the ESAF initiates a second arming signal to fire the flight motor. After another check on missile conditions (target lock check), ESAF initiates final arming to enable the warheads for detonation upon target impact. When the missile strikes the target, ESAF enables the tandem warhead function (provide appropriate time between the detonation of the precursor charge and the detonation of the main charge).
Though the Javelin's tandem HEAT warhead has proven efficient at destroying tanks, most threats it was employed against in Iraq and Afghanistan were weapon crews and teams, buildings, and lightly armored and unarmored vehicles. To make the Javelin more useful in these scenarios, the Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center developed a multi-purpose warhead (MPWH) for the FGM-148F. While it is still lethal against tanks, the new warhead has a naturally fragmenting steel warhead case that doubles the effectiveness against personnel due to enhanced fragmentation. The MPWH does not add weight or cost and has a lighter composite missile mid-body to enable drop-in replacement to existing Javelin tubes. The Javelin F-model was planned to begin deliveries in early 2020; the improved missile design, along with new lighter CLU with an improved target tracker, entered production in May 2020.
Most rocket launchers require a large clear area behind the gunner to prevent injury from backblast. To address this shortcoming without increasing recoil to an unacceptable level, the Javelin system uses a soft launch mechanism. A launch motor using conventional rocket propellant ejects the missile from the launcher, but stops burning before the missile clears the tube. The flight motor is ignited after a delay to allow sufficient clearance from the operator.
To save weight, the two motors are integrated with a burst disc between them. It is designed to tolerate the pressure of the launch motor from one side, but to easily rupture from the other when the flight motor ignites. The motors use a common nozzle, with the flight motor's exhaust flowing through the expended launch motor. Because the launch motor casing remains in place, an unusual annular (ring-shaped) igniter is used to start it. A normal igniter would be blown out of the back of the missile when the flight motor ignited and could injure the operator.
Since the launch motor uses a standard NATO propellant, the presence of lead beta-resorcinol as a burn rate modifier causes an amount of lead and lead oxide to be present in the exhaust; gunners are asked to hold their breath after firing for their safety.
In the event that the launch motor malfunctions and the launch tube is overpressurized—for example, if the rocket gets stuck—the Javelin missile includes a pressure release system to prevent the launcher from exploding. The launch motor is held in place by a set of shear pins, which fracture if the pressure rises too high, and allow the motor to be pushed out of the back of the tube.
As a fire-and-forget missile, after launch the missile has to be able to track and destroy its target without assistance from the gunner. This is done by coupling an onboard imaging IR system (separate from CLU imaging system) with an onboard tracking system.
The gunner uses the CLU's IR system to find and identify the target, then switches to the missile's independent IR system to set a track box around the target and establish a lock. The gunner places brackets around the image for locking.
The seeker stays focused on the target's image, continuing to track it as the target moves or the missile's flight path alters, or attack angles change. The seeker consists of three main components: focal plane array image sensor, cooling and calibration, and stabilization.
Focal plane array (FPA)Edit
The seeker assembly is encased in a dome that is transparent to long-wave infrared radiation. The IR radiation passes through the dome and then through lenses that focus the energy. The IR energy is reflected by mirrors on to the FPA. The seeker is a two-dimensional staring FPA of 64×64 MerCad (HgCdTe) detector elements. The FPA processes the signals from the detectors and relays a signal to the missile's tracker.
The staring array is a photo-voltaic device where the incident photons stimulate electrons and are stored, pixel by pixel, in readout integrated circuits attached at the rear of the detector. These electrons are converted to voltages that are multiplexed out of the ROIC on a frame-by-frame basis.
To function effectively, the FPA must be cooled and calibrated. In other applications, a CLU's IR detectors are cooled using a Dewar flask and a closed-cycle Stirling engine, but there is insufficient space in the missile for a similar solution. Prior to launch, a cooler mounted on the outside of the launch tube activates the electrical systems in the missile and supplies cold gas from a Joule-Thomson expander to the missile detector assembly while the missile is still in the launch tube. When the missile is fired, this external connection is broken and coolant gas is supplied internally by an onboard argon gas bottle. The gas is held in a small bottle at high pressure and contains enough coolant for the duration of the flight of approximately 19 seconds.
The seeker is calibrated using a chopper wheel. This device is a fan of six blades: five black blades with low IR emissivity and one semi-reflective blade. These blades spin in front of the seeker optics in a synchronized fashion such that the FPA is continually provided with points of reference in addition to viewing the scene. These reference points allow the FPA to reduce noise introduced by response variations in the detector elements.
The platform on which the seeker is mounted must be stabilized with respect to the motion of the missile body and the seeker must be moved to stay aligned with the target. The stabilization system must cope with rapid acceleration, up/down and lateral movements. This is done by a gimbal system, accelerometers, spinning-mass gyros (or MEMS), and motors to drive changes in position of the platform. The system is basically an autopilot. Information from the gyros is fed to the guidance electronics which drive a torque motor attached to the seeker platform to keep the seeker aligned with the target. The wires that connect the seeker with the rest of the missile are carefully designed to avoid inducing motion or drag on the seeker platform.
The tracker is key to guidance/control for an eventual hit. The signals from each of the 4,096 detector elements (64×64 pixel array) in the seeker are passed to the FPA readout integrated circuits which reads then creates a video frame that is sent to the tracker system for processing. By comparing the individual frames, the tracker determines the need to correct so as to keep the missile on target. The tracker must be able to determine which portion of the image represents the target.
The target is initially defined by the gunner, who places a configurable frame around it. The tracker then uses algorithms to compare that region of the frame based on image, geometric, and movement data to the new image frames being sent from the seeker, similar to pattern recognition algorithms. At the end of each frame, the reference is updated. The tracker is able to keep track of the target even though the seeker's point of view can change radically in the course of flight.
The missile is equipped with four movable tail fins and eight fixed wings at mid-body. To guide the missile, the tracker locates the target in the current frame and compares this position with the aim point. If this position is off center, the tracker computes a correction and passes it to the guidance system, which makes the appropriate adjustments to the four movable tail fins. This is an autopilot. To guide the missile, the system has sensors that check that the fins are positioned as requested. If not, the deviation is sent back to the controller for further adjustment. This is a closed-loop controller.
There are three stages in the flight managed by the tracker: 1) an initial phase just after launch; 2) a mid-flight phase that lasts for most of the flight; and 3) a terminal phase in which the tracker selects the most effective point of impact. With guidance algorithms, the autopilot uses data from the seeker and tracker to determine when to transition the missile from one phase of flight to another. Depending on whether the missile is in top attack or direct attack mode, the profile of the flight can change significantly. The top attack mode requires the missile to climb sharply after launch and cruise at high altitude then dive on the top of the target (curveball). In direct attack mode (fastball), the missile cruises at a lower altitude directly at the target. The exact flight path which takes into account the range to the target is calculated by the guidance unit.
A great familiarity of each control and swift operation needs to be achieved before the unit can be deployed efficiently. American troops are trained on the system at the Infantry School in Fort Benning, Georgia, for two weeks. The soldiers are taught basic care and maintenance, operation and abilities, assembly and disassembly, and the positions it can be fired from. Soldiers are also taught to distinguish between a variety of vehicle types even when only a rough outline is visible.
The soldiers must accomplish several timed drills with set standards before being qualified to operate the system in both training and wartime situations. There are also smaller training programs set up on most army bases that instruct soldiers on the proper use of the system. At these courses, the training program might be changed in small ways. This is most commonly only minor requirements left out due to budget, the number of soldiers vs. simulation equipment, and available time and resources. Both types of training courses have required proficiency levels that must be met before the soldier can operate the system in training exercises or wartime missions.
The Javelin was used by the US Army, the US Marine Corps and the Australian Special Forces in the 2003 invasion of Iraq on Iraqi Type 69 and Lion of Babylon tanks. During the Battle of Debecka Pass, a platoon of US special forces soldiers equipped with Javelins destroyed two T-55 tanks, eight armored personnel carriers, and four troop trucks.
During the War in Afghanistan, the Javelin was used effectively in counter-insurgency (COIN) operations. Initially, soldiers perceived the weapon as unsuitable for COIN due to its destructive power, but trained gunners were able to make precision shots against enemy positions with little collateral damage. The Javelin filled a niche in US weapons systems against DShK heavy machine guns and B-10 recoilless rifles—weapons like the AT4 and the M203 grenade launcher were powerful enough, but the ~300m range was insufficient. Conversely, while medium and heavy machine guns and automatic grenade launchers had the range, they lacked the power; and heavy mortars, which had both a good range and more than enough power, were not accurate enough.
The Javelin had enough range, power, and accuracy for dismounted infantry to counter standoff engagement tactics employed by enemy weapons. With good locks, the missile is most effective against vehicles, caves, fortified positions, and individual personnel. If enemy forces were inside a cave, a Javelin fired into the mouth of the cave would destroy it from the inside, which was not possible from the outside using heavy mortars. The psychological effect of the sound of a Javelin firing sometimes caused insurgents to disengage and flee their position. Even when not firing, the Javelin's CLU was commonly used as a man-portable surveillance system.
In 2016, claims were posted on social media that the Syrian Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) may have received Javelin missiles. By June 2018, it was still unconfirmed if the YPG themselves were fielding Javelin missiles, although US special forces units have been seen operating them in support of Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) advances during the Deir ez-Zor campaign in the Middle Euphrates River Valley.
During the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, NATO provided thousands of Javelins to Ukraine, where they proved highly effective. Javelins have been responsible for a part of the 230+ of armored vehicles Ukraine has destroyed, captured or damaged. An image dubbed "Saint Javelin", which shows Mary Magdalene holding a Javelin launcher in the style of an Eastern Orthodox church painting, gained attraction in social media and soon became a symbol of the Ukrainian resistance against the Russian invasion. An unknown number of Javelin launch tube assemblies were captured by the Russian armed forces during the conflict; it is unclear if any of the captured launchers contained live rounds, or were simply tubes discarded after being used. On 18 March, the Pentagon claimed out of 112 Javelins fired by the Ukrainians since the start of the war, 100 missiles had hit their target.
In a commentary from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), concerns were raised over the US stock of Javelin missiles. According to CSIS, the US has used to one-third of its Javelin missiles; 7,000 have been supplied thus far, with the United States buying Javelins at the rate of about 1,000 a year. The maximum production rate is 6,480 a year, but it would likely take a year or more to reach that level. Orders take 32 months to deliver; the report concluded that it would take about three or four years to replace the missiles that have already been sent to Ukraine. The commentary further stated that there are more tanks in the Russian Armed Forces than missiles potentially facing them; in Ukraine the missiles outnumber the tanks and it is unlikely that all Russian tanks would be deployed there. The missile production rate could be increased greatly with a national procurement effort. On May 8, 2022, Lockheed Martin CEO James Taiclet stated that Lockheed will nearly double the production of Javelins to 4000 a year. Additionally, Ukrainian officials estimated that up to 500 missiles per day were being used in the early days of the war.
The Javelin Weapon System has been incrementally upgraded, resulting in a number of variants and production blocks.
- FGM-148A: initial version
- FGM-148B: an improved version
- FGM-148C: a further improved version
- FGM-148D: export version
- FGM-148E: the result of a project called Spiral 1: it replaced electronic components in the control actuator section of the missile for cost and weight savings. Production started in 2017.
- FGM-148F: the result of a project called Spiral 2: fitted with a multi-purpose warhead. Production started in May 2020.
- FGM-148G: the expected result of a project called Spiral 3: it will develop a new launch tube assembly and battery unit, and will replace the current gas-cooled seeker with an uncooled seeker in the guidance section of the missile. Production missiles will be designated FGM-148G.
- Australia: 92 launchers.
- Bahrain: 13 launchers.
- Czech Republic: Purchased 3 launchers and 12 missiles for its special forces (intended for use in Afghanistan). An additional order totaling US$10.21 million was placed in December 2015 for an unknown number of missiles and launchers.
- Estonia: 80 CLU (with option for additional 40) and 350 missiles purchased from the United States. In service from 2016.
- France: 76 launchers and 260 missiles for use in Afghanistan. Was replacing MILAN anti-tank missile, no follow-on order in favor of the Missile Moyenne Portée (MMP).
- Georgia: 72 CLUs and 410 missiles received in 2018, and the delivery of another 46 CLUs and 82 missiles approved in 2021. The first Foreign Military Sale to the Georgian military consisting of 410 missiles, and 72 CLUs includes 2 Javelin Block 1 CLUs to be used as spares was approved for US$75 million. Another contract that was approved in 2021 consisted of 46 CLUs and 82 missiles for a total sum of US$30 million.
- Indonesia: 25 launchers and 189 missiles. Javelin Block 1 variant in a US$60 million deal.
- Ireland: Irish Army, replaced MILAN anti-tank missile.
- Jordan: 30 launchers and 116 missiles were received in 2004, and another 162 CLUs, 18 Fly-to-Buy Missiles, 1,808 Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missiles and other support equipment was ordered in 2009. The estimated cost is $388 million. Jordan placed another order of $133.9 million in 2017.
- Libya: Used by the Libyan National Army
- Lithuania: Total: 144 CLU and 871 missiles purchased from the United States. In 2001, 40 launchers and 200 missiles. The first European country to receive this launcher and missile system (2001). In December 2015 DSCA approved for a possible Foreign Military Sale to Lithuania for another 220 missiles and 74 CLUs for $55 million, plus 30 CLU and 350 missiles in 2026.
- New Zealand: 24 launchers and 390 missiles (in batches of 120, then 270)
- Norway: 100 launchers and 526 missiles. Delivered from 2006, in use from 2009. In 2017 Norwegian authorities started the process of finding a replacement anti-tank weapon, in order to counter new types of heavy tanks equipped with active protection systems capable of defeating missiles like the Javelin.
- Oman: 30 launchers.
- Poland: 79 launchers, 180 missiles
- Qatar: In March 2013, Qatar requested the sale of 500 Javelin missiles and 50 command launch units. The deal was signed in March 2014.
- Saudi Arabia: 20 launchers and 150 missiles
- Taiwan: In 2002, Taiwan bought 360 missiles and 40 launcher units for $39 million. The contract also included training devices, logistics support, associated equipment and training. In 2008, the United States issued a congressional notification for the sale of a further 20 launchers and 182 more missiles.
- Ukraine: Over 5500 systems. In March 2018, Ukraine purchased 210 missiles and 37 launchers from the United States worth $47 million. No details beyond the confirmation of the delivery (on 30 April 2018) have been provided. At the end of 2019, Ukraine announced it had signed contracts to purchase another 150 missiles and 10 launchers. On 21 June 2020, they were sent to Ukraine. In early December 2021 the commander of the Joint Forces Operation confirmed deployment of Javelin missiles with troops near the line of contact in eastern Ukraine.[needs update]
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom: The UK Ministry of Defence purchased 850 Javelin units and 9,000 missiles for the Light Forces Anti-Tank Guided Weapon System (LFATGWS) requirement. Javelin entered UK service in 2005, replacing the MILAN and Swingfire systems.
- United States: In 2003, the United States General Accounting Office (GAO) reported that the army could not account for 36 Javelin command launch units worth approximately $2.8 million. The New York Times later reported supply chain problems at military armories and warehouses in 2004 and expressed concerns of weapons falling into enemy hands.
- Thailand: On 30 July 2021, the US State Department announced a possible Foreign Military Sale to Thailand of 300 Javelin FGM-148 Missiles and 50 Javelin Command Launch Units (CLU) worth $83.5 million.
- India: India had proposed a deal to buy some systems off-the-shelf with a larger number to be license manufactured locally through "transfer of technology" but this was not acknowledged by the United States. Instead, in September 2013, the US offered co-development of a newer variant of the Javelin which was, this time, not acknowledged by India. Eventually, the plan to purchase Javelins was "shelved" and in October 2014, India chose to buy the Israeli Spike missile system.
- HJ-12, by Norinco (China)
- 9M133 Kornet, by KBP Instrument Design Bureau (Russia)
- Missile Moyenne Portée, by MBDA Missiles (France)
- MPATGM, by DRDO (India)
- NLAW (United Kingdom and Sweden)
- OMTAS (Turkey)
- Spike, by Rafael Defense (Israel)
- Type 01 LMAT, by Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan)
- AGM-176 Griffin, shared components by Raytheon
- "Javelin in Afghanistan: The Effective Use of an Anti-Tank Weapon for Counter-Insurgency Operations" (PDF). www.dtic.mil. Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.: Raytheon Technologies. 15 March 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- Linehan, Adam (2 June 2016). "Unsung Heroes: The 'Javelin Aces' Who Laid Waste To An Iraqi Armored Unit". Task & Purpose. New York: North Equity LLC. Archived from the original on 5 June 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
- Lagneau, Laurent (15 November 2016). "La bataille de Raqqa, en français dans le texte" [The battle of Raqqa, in French in the text]. opex360.com (in French). Zone militaire. Archived from the original on 30 August 2018. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
- Walsh, Declan; Schmitt, Eric; Ismay, John (28 June 2019). "American Missiles Found in Libyan Rebel Compound". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 November 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- Schogol, Jeff (7 March 2022). "The US and NATO have reportedly shipped 17,000 anti-tank weapons to Ukraine". Task & Purpose. New York: North Equity LLC. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
- "Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates: Justification Book of Missile Procurement, Army" (PDF). Virginia: United States Department of the Army. February 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022. Page 66:"$165.355 million supports the production of 763 missiles and the non-recurring expenses for the G-model production cut-in"
- "US approves Ukraine's purchase of 150 Javelin anti-tank missiles". 3 October 2019.
- "Raytheon/Lockheed Martin Javelin Joint Venture Awarded Contract For 2,100 F-Model Missiles, Marking Initial Full-Rate Production". Orlando, Florida: Lockheed Martin. 30 January 2019. Archived from the original on 2 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Javelin (Warhead)" (PDF). Middletown, Iowa: American Ordnance LLC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Javelin Portable Anti-Tank Missile". www.army-technology.com. Army Technology. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 25 December 2014.
- "Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates: Justification Book of Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army RDT&E − Volume II, Budget Activity 5" (PDF). Virginia: United States Department of the Army. p. 187. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Javelin Missile Hits Targets Beyond Current Maximum Range During Tests". missilethreat.com. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. 8 February 2013. Archived from the original on 15 August 2016. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
- Mohammadi, Ali. "Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile". Military Today. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- Pike, John. "Javelin Antitank Missile". Globalsecurity.org. GlobalSecurity.org. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- "Introduction to Crew Served Weapons B3M4078 Student Handout" (PDF). Camp Barrett, Virginia: United States Marine Corps. pp. 14–15. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 June 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Javelin Antitank Missile". man.fas.org. Washington, DC, US: Federation of American Scientists Military Analysis Network. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- Blake, Bernard (1988). Jane's Weapon Systems 1988–1989. Coulsdon, England ; Alexandria, Vancouver, US: Jane's Information Group. p. 153. ISBN 9780710608550. OCLC 18304207.
- "Javelin". www.redstone.army.mil. Archived from the original on 15 February 2001. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- "Instrumentation Development: Javelin Environmental Test System (JETS)". www.rttc.army.mil. Redstone Technical Test Center, Huntsville, Alabama, US: United States Army Test and Evaluation Command. Archived from the original on 26 January 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "262 Phase I Selections from the 06.2 Solicitation". Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
- Hicks, Dave (20 March 2013). "Close Combat Missile Systems Overview to Precision Strike Association" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 April 2014.
- Lye, Harry (12 March 2021). "Raytheon launches Stinger missile from Javelin launcher". Army Technology. New York, NY, US. Archived from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- Smith, Heather (3 July 2012). "Javelin warhead redesigned for future threats". The Redstone Rocket. Decatur, Alabama, US. Archived from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- Gould, Joe (6 May 2020). "Lockheed-Raytheon's deadlier F-Model Javelin anti-tank missile rolls into production". Defense News. Tysons, Virginia, US: Sightline Media Group. Archived from the original on 7 May 2020. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "64 × 64 LWIR Focal Plane Assembly (FPA) Highly Linear, Rapid Operation Staring Array" (PDF). www.raytheon.com. Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.: Raytheon Technologies. 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- Shanker, Thom (22 September 2003). "The Struggle for Iraq: Combat; How Green Berets Beat the Odds at an Iraq Alamo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 October 2017.
- "EXCLUSIVE: Interethnic coalition takes on the IS group in Syria". France 24. 22 April 2016. Archived from the original on 28 April 2016. Retrieved 24 April 2016 – via Youtube.
- Gibbons-Neff, Thomas (23 February 2016). "This highly advanced U.S.-made anti-tank missile could now be on Syria's frontlines". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
- "Ukraine Has Become a Graveyard for Russian Tanks". WSJ.com. Wall Street Journal. 17 March 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
- Ghosh, Poulomi (26 February 2022). "Who is St Javelin? Why is she going viral amid Russia-Ukraine war?". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- "How St Javelin become the face of Ukraine resistance amid war?". mint. 26 February 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- Gault, Matthew (25 February 2022). "Who Is St. Javelin and Why Is She a Symbol of the War in Ukraine?". Vice. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- "Amerikanskij granatomet i raketu NLAW našli na byvših pozicijah VSU" Американский гранатомет и ракету NLAW нашли на бывших позициях ВСУ [American grenade launcher and NLAW rocket found at former positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces]. Izvestiya (in Russian). Moscow, Russia: Inews. 27 February 2022. ISSN 0233-4356. OCLC 427395058. Archived from the original on 28 February 2022. Retrieved 15 March 2022.
- Cancian, Mark (12 April 2022). "Will the United States Run Out of Javelins Before Russia Runs Out of Tanks?". Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
- Cancian, Mark (14 April 2022). "Will the US run out of Javelin anti-tank missiles to give Ukraine before Russia runs out of tanks?". Yahoo.com. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
- CNN (14 April 2022). "US stocks of Javelin anti-tank missiles are running low, report says". Egypt Independent. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
- Business Insider (9 May 2022). "Lockheed is nearly doubling production of Javelin anti-tank missiles". Retrieved 9 May 2022.
- "Javelin Close Combat Missile System – Medium" (PDF). Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2022. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- "Javelin Portable Anti-Tank Missile". Army Technology. 14 March 2022.
- The World Defence Almanac 2010. Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, US: Monch Publishing Group. 2010. pp. 136, 174, 184, 286, 298, 418, 423. ISBN 9781612000565. ISSN 0722-3226. OCLC 751805929.
- "Bahrain Requests 160 Javelins & 60 CLUs". Archived from the original on 24 March 2007. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- "A-report" (PDF) (in Czech). Prague, Czech Republic: The Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Czech Republic to buy Javelin ATGWs | IHS Jane's 360". Janes.com. Archived from the original on 7 December 2015. Retrieved 7 December 2015.
- Einmann, Andres (18 November 2014). "Eesti saab Javelini tankitõrjesüsteemid järgmisel aastal" [Estonia will receive Javelin anti-tank systems next year]. Postimees (in Estonian). Tallinn, Estonia. Archived from the original on 19 January 2018. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
- "Armor: Missing Milans In Gaza". Strategypage.com. 21 October 2012. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- Pierre, Tran (5 December 2015). "France Orders Anti-Tank Missile from MBDA". Defense News. Tysons, Virginia, US: Sightline Media Group. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "The U.S. Congress approved the sale of the Georgia anti-tank systems "javelin"". Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
- Bisaccio, Derek (4 April 2019). "Georgia Receives All Javelin Missile Systems". Forecast International. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
- "US Approves Javelin Missile Sale to Georgia in Deal Worth $30 Million". 5 August 2021.
- "FGM-148 Javelin Block I: Fire and Forget Dengan Pemandu Infra Red". Indomiliter.com. 19 August 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
- Jones, Richard D. Jane's Infantry Weapons 2009/2010. Jane's Information Group; 35 edition (27 January 2009). ISBN 978-0-7106-2869-5.
- "Jordan to buy Javelin anti-tank missiles from USA of worth $388 million". Archived from the original on 6 March 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- "Raytheon/Lockheed secure contract for foreign Javelin missile sales". UPI. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
- Scott, Nicholas (16 August 2017). "Lockheed-Raytheon JV Awarded $134M to Supply 3 FMS Clients With Javelin Equipment". Gov Con Wire.
- "Raketų paleidimo sistema "JAVELIN"" [JAVELIN missile launch system]. kariuomene.kam.lt (in Lithuanian). Lithuanian Armed Forces. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- John Pike (18 December 2015). "Lithuania-Javelin Missiles and Command Launch Units". Globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- Marcus, Jonathan (30 May 2017). "Should Russia's new Armata T-14 tanks worry Nato?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 30 May 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- "US approves sale to Poland of 180 Javelin guided missiles". The Defense Post. Washington, D.C., US. 5 March 2020. Archived from the original on 28 February 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- "Poland – Javelin Missile and Command Launch Unit". www.dsca.mil. Washington, D.C., US: Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 4 March 2020. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
- "FMS: Qatar Requests Sales of 500 Javelin Anti-Tank Missile Rounds and 50 Launch Units". Deagel.com. 28 March 2013. Archived from the original on 27 March 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- Mustafa, Awad (27 March 2014). "$23.9B in Deals Announced on Last Day of DIMDEX". Defense News. Tysons, Virginia, US: Sightline Media Group. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – JAVELIN Missiles | The Official Home of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency". Dsca.mil. 18 November 2010. Archived from the original on 27 May 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- Written at Bethesda, Maryland, US. "Taiwan Agrees to Purchase Raytheon-Lockheed Martin Javelin Anti-tank Weapon System". missilesandfirecontrol.com. Tucson, Arizona, US: Lockheed Martin. 24 July 2002. Archived from the original on 27 March 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States – JAVELIN Guided Missile Systems" (PDF). DSCA. 3 October 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 5 October 2008.
- Stavros Atlamazoglou (17 April 2022). "50,000,000 Bullets and More: Check Out the Weapons Biden Is Giving Ukraine". 19FortyFive. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
- "Fact Sheet on U.S. Security Assistance for Ukraine". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
- "U.S. Confirms Delivery Of Javelin Antitank Missiles To Ukraine". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Archived from the original on 1 May 2018. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
- "Ukraine – Javelin Missiles and Command Launch Units – The Official Home of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency". www.dsca.mil. Archived from the original on 2 March 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- "Ukraine Says It Has New Contracts For Second Batch Of U.S. Javelin Missiles". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 27 December 2019. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
- "U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Facebook post: United States Air Force Port Dawgs load a contract aircraft at Dover Air Force Base". Facebook. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
- Ponomarenko, Illia (9 December 2021). "Javelin anti-tank missiles seen deployed to Donbas". The Kyiv Independent. Retrieved 11 December 2021.
- "New Shoulder-Launched Missile Enters Service Four Months Early". Government News Network. 28 July 2005. Archived from the original on 3 March 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
- "Javelin Medium Range Anti-tank Guided Weapon". Archived from the original on 10 January 2013. Retrieved 8 October 2011.
- Abate, Tom (18 May 2003). "Military waste under fire / trillion missing – Bush plan targets Pentagon accounting". The San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 19 June 2012. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
- Schmitt, Eric; Thompson, Ginger (11 November 2007). "Broken Supply Channel Sent Arms for Iraq Astray". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 22 February 2015. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- Grevatt, Jon (8 February 2021). "US approves Javelin sale to Thailand". Janes Defense News. Archived from the original on 8 February 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
- Pandit, Rajat (17 August 2010). "India to order large number of Javelin anti-tank missiles from US". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 12 September 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
- Pandit, Rajat (29 November 2012). "Israel pips US in anti-tank guided missile supply to India". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
- Raghuvanshi, Vivek (16 August 2014). "Too Early To Assess Indo-US Defense Ties". Defensenews.com. Gannett. Archived from the original on 16 August 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2014.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to FGM-148 Javelin.|