Open main menu

Doubled and quadrupled commasEdit

Hi, I noticed your use of Doubled and quadrupled commas, a notation which I have never seen before. If you invented this notation, I am interested in its genesis. It reminds me of Jacqueline Kennedy's letter-writing style (she tended to avoid periods). Perhaps you might illuminate its meaning for me? What I thought of when reading the edit, was that you were thinking multiple phrases that you were intending to fill in later, but then you cut your edit short, leaving the commas. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 16:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

 I will amend such irregular comma proliferations in the future, I thank you for bringing it to my 
 attention--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you! /(wikiproject med)Edit

  Thanks for stopping in at WikiProject Medicine. Feel free to ask any questions about health articles there. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

very kind--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

ebola [1][2][3]fresEdit

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

~ Category:"Part of a series on" sidebar templates

 
V.Ebola pathogenesis via infection of endothelial cells causes cytopathic effect which with cytokine effect, can compromise vascular integrity.[1]

Ozzie, if you've the time, go around to the other articles and let them know about the ivote on the title. Drop a note on the talk pages with a link so they will easily get to it. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)



Thanks, yes



ebola article 2, Navarro College ,Texas/(cover)Edit

Might that not be better placed, due to the low relevance of a singe college in Texas in relation to the wider epidemic, in the U.S. sub article instead section "Call for suspension of visas"? As an example of how (not) to quarantine the virus? Also it doesn't fit with the timeline since the letter was dated to 2 October per Slate.--Alcea setosa (talk) 22:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)




noteEdit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic HERE. <!- Template:ANI-notice-->

Thank you.
 
III.Ebola Virus Protein-Cross-section of the Ebola virus particle[2][3]
 
IV.Ebola Virus from Mali blood sample November 2014 during West Africa Ebola virus epidemic 2014-2016[4]
 
I.Genome of Ebola virus-contains the coding regions, a genome contains genetic information, it consists of RNA.EBOV is about 19,000 nucleotides in length (7 genes, including VP40) single stranded ribonucleic acid.[5][6]
II.Ebola virus glycoprotein structure (which includes virion hexamer and transport dimer from VP40 ).[7][8]video/Nature PMC2700032

NoteEdit

note/
  1. ^ Marcinkiewicz, Janusz; Bryniarski, Krzysztof; Nazimek, Katarzyna (1 January 2014). "Ebola haemorrhagic fever virus: pathogenesis, immune responses, potential prevention". Folia Medica Cracoviensia. 54 (3): 39–48. ISSN 0015-5616.
  2. ^ Diehl, William E.; Lin, Aaron E.; Grubaugh, Nathan D.; Carvalho, Luiz Max; Kim, Kyusik; Kyawe, Pyae Phyo; McCauley, Sean M.; Donnard, Elisa; Kucukural, Alper; McDonel, Patrick; Schaffner, Stephen F.; Garber, Manuel; Rambaut, Andrew; Andersen, Kristian G.; Sabeti, Pardis C.; Luban, Jeremy (November 2016). "Ebola Virus Glycoprotein with Increased Infectivity Dominated the 2013–2016 Epidemic". Cell. 167 (4): 1088–1098.e6. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.014.Primary source per MEDRS however valid source per "Molecular and Cell Biology"
  3. ^ Lee, Jeffrey E; Saphire, Erica Ollmann (November 2009). "glycoprotein structure and mechanism of entry". Future Virology. 4 (6): 621–635. doi:10.2217/fvl.09.56. ISSN 1746-0794.
  4. ^ Hoenen, T.; Safronetz, D.; Groseth, A.; Wollenberg, K. R.; Koita, O. A.; Diarra, B.; Fall, I. S.; Haidara, F. C.; Diallo, F.; Sanogo, M.; Sarro, Y. S.; Kone, A.; Togo, A. C. G.; Traore, A.; Kodio, M.; Dosseh, A.; Rosenke, K.; Wit, E. de; Feldmann, F.; Ebihara, H.; Munster, V. J.; Zoon, K. C.; Feldmann, H.; Sow, S. (3 April 2015). "Mutation rate and genotype variation of Ebola virus from Mali case sequences". Science. 348 (6230): 117–119. doi:10.1126/science.aaa5646. ISSN 0036-8075.
  5. ^ Saeidnia, Soodabeh; Abdollahi, Mohammad (12 November 2014). "Ebola hemorrhagic fever: current outbreak and progress in finding a cure". DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 22 (1). doi:10.1186/s40199-014-0070-9. ISSN 1560-8115.
  6. ^ Gale, P. (26 September 2016). "Could Bat Cell Temperature and Filovirus Filament Length Explain the Emergence of Ebola Virus in Mammals? Predictions of a Thermodynamic Model". Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. doi:10.1111/tbed.12580. ISSN 1865-1682.subscription required
  7. ^ Madara, Jonathan J; Han, Ziying; Ruthel, Gordon; Freedman, Bruce D; Harty, Ronald N (May 2015). "The multifunctional Ebola virus VP40 matrix protein is a promising therapeutic target". Future Virology. 10 (5): 537–546. doi:10.2217/fvl.15.6. ISSN 1746-0794.
  8. ^ Silva, Leslie P.; Vanzile, Michael; Bavari, Sina; Aman, J. M. Javad; Schriemer, David C.; Sticht, Heinrich (5 July 2012). "Assembly of Ebola Virus Matrix Protein VP40 Is Regulated by Latch-Like Properties of N and C Terminal Tails". PLoS ONE. 7 (7): e39978. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039978. ISSN 1932-6203.Primary source per MEDRS however valid source per "Molecular and Cell Biology"
Both VSV-EBOV and CAd3-ZEBOV are being studied for vaccine purposes.
EVD (non-evd fr/spa)
outbreaks
Date Country Virus
1967   West Germany
  Yugoslavia
MARV
1975   Rhodesia
  South Africa
MARV
Jun–Nov 1976   Sudan SUDV
Aug 1976   Zaire EBOV
1976   United Kingdom SUDV or EBOV
1977   Zaire EBOV
Aug–Sep 1979   Sudan SUDV
1980   Kenya MARV
1987   Kenya RAVV
1989   United States RESTV
1989–1990   Philippines RESTV
1990   Soviet Union MARV
1990   United States RESTV
1992   Italy RESTV
Dec 1994–
Feb 1995
  Gabon EBOV
1994   Côte d'Ivoire TAFV
1995   Côte d'Ivoire
May–Jul 1995   Zaire EBOV
Jan–Apr 1996   Gabon EBOV
1996   South Africa EBOV
1996   United States RESTV
1996   Philippines RESTV
Jul 1996–
Mar 1997
  Gabon EBOV
1996   Russia EBOV
1998–2000   Democratic Republic of the Congo MARV & RAVV
Oct 2000–
Jan 2001
  Uganda SUDV
Oct 2001–
Jul 2002
  Gabon
  Republic of the Congo
EBOV
Dec 2002–
Apr 2003
  Republic of the Congo EBOV
Nov–Dec 2003   Republic of the Congo EBOV
Apr–Jun 2004   Sudan SUDV
2004   Russia EBOV
2004–2005   Angola MARV
Aug–Nov 2007   Democratic Republic of the Congo EBOV
2007   Uganda MARV & RAVV
Dec 2007–
Jan 2008
  Uganda BDBV
2008   Uganda
  Netherlands
  United States
MARV
Dec 2008–
Feb 2009
  Democratic Republic of the Congo EBOV
2008   Philippines RESTV
Jun–Aug 2012   Uganda SUDV
2012   Uganda MARV
Jun–Nov 2012   Democratic Republic of the Congo BDBV
^ 2013–2016 Widespread:
  Liberia
  Sierra Leone
  Guinea
Limited and local:
  Nigeria
  Mali
  United States
  Senegal
  Spain
  United Kingdom
  Italy
EBOV
Aug–Nov 2014   Democratic Republic of the Congo EBOV
2014   Uganda MARV
2015   Philippines RESTV
2017   Democratic Republic of the Congo EBOV
2017   Uganda MARV
2018   Hungary
May-July 2018   Democratic Republic of the Congo EBOV
^August 2018   Democratic Republic of the Congo EBOV

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

^ took/will take to GA article status/publish

A barnstar for you!/ebolaEdit

  The Teamwork Barnstar
Ozzie, I have noticed how willing you are to always help the Ebola article by offering feedback on the talk page. It has made my editing easier and a much more joyful experience. Your sincere efforts to maintain a friendly atmosphere have been very much appreciated. Gandydancer (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ozzie10aaaa i second this nomination. It is a pleasure working with you... Greeting Brian BrianGroen (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


  Like   Bfpage |leave a message  11:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:48, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Halloween greetings!Edit

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

REEdit

Hi, This source is not reliable. It uses Wikipedia as a source. Read it carefully. --Max24 (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

you are correct--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Can we be friends?/ ebolaEdit

I wanted to make sure there weren't any hard feelings about the Ebola article. You're clearly a WP:Good-faith editor, and I don't want to upset or wrong you. The new information about the Liberian infection rate was important and useful, and I hope you don't mind my revising it. I was trying to improve it according to WP:TONE and WP:MOS, as I have needed other editors to fix my own edits.

As to allegations of sockpuppetry, I recognize that I've been unusually active for a new-ish user (evidently I need more of a life). I can totally see where you're coming from, and going to an admin seems like a great response. You're welcome to go through my past and future edits, and follow instructions on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations to report me if you find evidence of misbehavior. Thanks for your efforts!

I wish you the best, and apologize again for any offense I've given you. FourViolas (talk) 02:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

all opinions count, as does yours--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

RE/ Hemopurifier [5]/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi Ozzie I researched this. a) it's an early stage product which may never come into general use ( http://www.aethlonmedical.com/products/hemopurifier/index.htm ) b) it must be attached to a kidney dialysis machine - not many of those in W Africa !! ( http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2014/nov/14/aethlon-hemopurifier-ebola/ ) c) the patient was receiving multiple therapies and his viral load was already in decline ( http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2014/nov/14/aethlon-hemopurifier-ebola/ ) Cheers, Bob. Robertpedley (talk) 15:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC) Hello again, Ozzie! Please don't take my edits personally. I spend an average of 1 hour researching before I make any edit. I'll only add material if it enhances the value of the article to the reader - it's important to maintain the reputation of WP and of the Ebola pages. I'll remove any edit which doesn't meet WP guidelines or is not relevant to the page. Robertpedley (talk) 11:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

CONAKRY Hi Ozzie The BBC lead says "Clinical trials to try to find an effective treatment for Ebola patients are to start in West Africa next month." The serum trial hasn't started yet.Bob Robertpedley (talk) 15:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

ANI(decision)That's a content dispute. ANI isn't for content disputes.

[6] reviewing this diff though you are correct that his stance is not logical. The material in question was the USA answer and precautions to the Epidemic in west Africa. So it is related and belongs in the article. But that is only my opinion. I think they are suggesting you should put it Ebola virus cases in the United States. This isn't unreasonable. You really just to get with them and talk. Take it to the talk page. If that don't work open an RFC or take it to the appropriate noticeboard. There are plenty of ways to get a consensus.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Some climbing equipment for you!/ebolaEdit


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Seasons GreetingsEdit

  Happy holidays.
Best wishes for joy and happiness. to Ozzie BrianGroen (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)({{Subst:Xmas4})

my apologies/ ebolaEdit

Sorry Ozzie i did not see your netherlands edit... I have updated it a bit and moved in Alphabetical order.. You may slap my hand, permission granted BrianGroen (talk) 11:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

I think you added to it, in a positive manner--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, OzzieEdit


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:40, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


Seasonal Greets!Edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New YearEdit

Happy new year Ozzie.... Hope you have a Fab year.BrianGroen (talk) 14:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much - same to you. Happy editing in 2015! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC

Happy New Year, Ozzie!Edit


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

RE/Dyslexia/GA (wikiproject med) [7]Edit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa

Due to my own dyslexic issues my copy editing skills are next to zero, but i can help provide links to supporting citations and and worldcat IDs for books. I found out about my poor copy editing abilities when i tried ot edit the dyslexia article back in 2009 - 2010. There was a Dyslexia prject set of pages with a few suggested future updates. Not sure if it si still accessable. best wishes dolfrog (talk) 12:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

It is slightly dated but some of the ideas may be useful Wikipedia:WikiProject Dyslexia and my most recent set of dyslexia links including some research papers can be found on my new Useful Dyslexia links web page which represents more my personal perpsective. Currently I am busy elsewhere but i will try to keep up with your progress with the article dolfrog (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

I would be honored to assist,thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Definition of DyslexiaEdit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa,

While it's true when it comes to dyslexia the diagnosis is clinical and scientific, the treatment is educational.

That's why my hope is to find a home for the NICHD definition of dyslexia. In 1994 and again in 2002 the IDA lead the Definition Consensus Project in partnership with the National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD), and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The resulting definition helped align the professional community and laid the groundwork for important public policy initiatives going forward.

Todayl, this definition is the cornerstone for important legislation in the U.S. that is leading to early screening, evaluation and help. It took an extraordinary commitment from a large dedicated team to reach this important milestone and it would be great to find a place on Wikipedia for this important information.

Please advise.

Best,

John Mayo-Smith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayosmith (talkcontribs) 17:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC) (see answer above)

Your GA nomination of DyslexiaEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dyslexia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bluerasberry -- Bluerasberry (talk) 14:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of DyslexiaEdit

The article Dyslexia you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Dyslexia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 15:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Dyslexia--Moxy (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for DyslexiaEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Dyslexia/GA2Edit

Thanks for the thanks! Have just noticed: what does "sounding out words" in the second line of the Lead mean? ~ P-123 (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

P-123 dyslexics go by different routes of learning they need "sounds" to ascertain what it is they are saying or being said...in this case it simply means an emphasis on the word..example -the train is coming,,,a dyslexic would say - t-h-e t-r-a-I-n I-s c-o-m-I-n-g to get a full appreciation of the sentence, it isn't easy , thanks for asking--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I thought that is what it meant. ~ P-123 (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't think "sounding out words" in the second sentence is clear enough for the general reader, but I cannot think of a better way to say it the moment. ~ P-123 (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
P-123 don't worry, and thanks again for your valuable help ([8])--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


access grant/ Wikipedia:Elsevier ScienceDirect results mostly out, but more to come? /(wikiproject med)^Edit

You need to say clearly which option you are applying for, whether it is obvious or not. Wiki CRUK John (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)             Approvedaccess grant



METRICS

RE/ FYI Complementary and Alternative Medicine/(wikiproject med)^Edit

—Given that the remedy has just been enacted, I am providing this notice to everybody who has participated in the discussion on Jimbo Wales' talk page for their information. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)


thank you, for informing me on this controversial med subject--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

west Africa/ebolaEdit

Hi Ozzie.. I think that Perhaps these 3 do need a little rearranging.. Guinea with the lowest cases, but the index case has to stay first, Sierra Leone second sounds good, with Liberia last Mostly because of the total case counts. The daily Case counts must be viewed cautiously, how many times has it happened that case counts slow, just before it resurfaces in a new region. Also i'm concerned about the 'Suspected case' counts that are still increasing, as well as the slowness of reports coming out of Liberia. Then again it wont move to "Contained" until WHO confirms... So I see no real problem with a little reshuffle.. GremlinSA 13:30, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Just a quick note update.. Looking at latest released figures from Liberia.. Feb 28th http://www.mohsw.gov.lr/documents/Sitrep%20289%20Feb%2028th%202015.pdf - suspected:4354 Probable:1877 Confirmed:3149, and March 5th http://www.mohsw.gov.lr/documents/Sitrep%20294%20March%205th%202015.pdf suspected:4479 (+125) Probable:1879(+2) Confirmed:3149... thats 127 cases in 5 days. GremlinSA 11:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


I agree, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

MEDDATE /(wikiproject med)^[13]Edit

You cite MEDDATE in a lot of discussions, so I wanted to take a moment to clarify that "rule". It's meant to be a rule of thumb, rather than an absolute requirement. It doesn't say just "five years"; it says "five years or so", and those last two words matter. It also says that the rule was written for subjects that receive the most attention, like Hypertension, and not for rare diseases or other subjects that don't see much research attention.

What you really want is to consider the last few high-quality secondary sources, which (depending on the subject) might be professional-level books or review articles. We want to take advantage of what MEDDATE calls the "full review cycle": Alice published a review, Bob published a primary study, and Chris read both Alice's and Bob's papers and wrote a new review. If it took ten years to get through a full review cycle, then MEDDATE actually wants ten years, not five. Conversely, if you get three good review articles every month, then MEDDATE would rather than you used this year's or last year's best publications, instead of going back to anything that was no more than four years and 364 days old. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


your correct, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


Humans and the EnvironmentEdit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa. A notification came up that you asked me a question[14], but I then saw you reverted it so assumed you changed your mind. I only just now noticed that you asked it in another format. I know Jytdog gave an answer at WT:MED#Safety of genetically modified foods, but since that thread is getting quite long and relatively stale I though I would give my 2 cents here. Feel free to move it back there if you think that appropriate.

The interactions between GMOs and the environment then the environment and humans are complicated so a straight answer may be difficult. Some of the main environmental concerns covered at the controversies page are; insects developing resistance, horizontal gene transfer to other plants, death of non-target organisms, loss of biodiversity and secondary pests becoming more prominent. The effect of these on the environment are hard to accurately predict, let alone whether they will have any indirect effect on human health. Glyphosphate-resistant weeds resulting from gene flow are unlikely to develop outside of crops as they do not provide any selective advantage in the wild, but insect resistant ones might. Loss of biodiversity is a problem with all agriculture and so is the death of non-target organisms. Everything is interconnected in some way so I can't honestly say something occurring to environment through genetic engineering will never effect human health at some point. I feel that would be true for any technology though. Most people when thinking about human health and GM food are more concerned with the direct relationship. If I eat this will it be harmful to me. I think the article is better off distinguishing between the environment and human health the way it does.

You gave an example that increased pesticides used on GM crops may lead to increased risk of cancers.[15] The theory being that GMO crops have increased pesticide use and high levels of pesticide are a risk factor for some cancers. Currently there are two main groups of GM crops on the market (Bt crops and glyphosphate resistant crops). Bt crops actually use less pesticide since they are modified to be insect resistant (so need less synthetic pesticide). The Bt toxin itself has been shown through multiple studies to be harmless to humans and even non-target insects[16][17][18]. Glyphosphate is relatively safe to humans (see Glyphosate#Human toxicity) compared to other herbicides. Any chemical application is going to be regulated under various governmental acts designed to keep toxicity levels below a certain level and this will apply to all crops including GMO ones. You also have to take into account that most toxicity studies are done using straight round-up or a similar product, whereas in practice the final food product will at most have only residue of the chemical and in most cases virtually none of the pesticide will remain. Again all this is all regulated (with-holding periods and the like) and not unique to GMO.

Anyway, I am not trying to convince you to become a supporter GM. I don't even really know where you stand on the issue. I personally see huge potential and most of the risks as being speculative, especially those related to human health. I knew a group of researchers that were trying to put vaccines in bananas. One idea being that they could be used to vaccinate kids in regions with unreliable or no power. I think this factor and many other similar ones get overlooked and the discussion is dominated by Monsanto's involvement and much of the opposition is because of them. AIRcorn (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

RfC on GM foodEdit

Note about this RfC where you !voted. I tweaked the statement to make it more clear that it is about eating GM food and health. I'm notifying each person who !voted, in case that matters to you. Sorry for the trouble. Jytdog (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

(redact)this is an important topic.[19] thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

(wikiproject med)Edit

  The Medicine Barnstar
Just great to see someone with your demeanor and editing ability helping the project so much!!! Moxy (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


thank you (especially coming from you)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

NP my friend!! . On a side note I noticed you edit Ebola articles...new book out Center For Disease Control; Francois Wilson (2014). CDC Guidance on Ebola Virus (EVD): 2014 Edition. International Publications Media Group. ISBN 978-1-63267-011-3. and..last month they also digitized Ebola Virus: New Insights for the Healthcare Professional: 2011 Edition: ScholarlyPaper. Scholarly Editions. 2012. ISBN 978-1-4649-1493-5. -- Moxy (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


your are the best!..thanks!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you! /(wikiproject med)Edit

  Thanks for being around on the WP:MED board. I feel like your presence and short comments have encouraged other people to be more forward in sharing their ideas, even brief ones. Also the direct impact of your contributions are a benefit to everyone. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

It looks like you deserve that cup of coffee! I left a note on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Disagreement_at_Psychosurgery_and_History_of_psychosurgery, thanking you as well for your note about my "valuable" opinion. If there is an emerging consensus perhaps it would be useful if you left a note under Talk:History of psychosurgery as well to prevent deletion of those useful references at least under that heading. Philipegalite (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)


and thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)


I also appreciate the way you tell people that you've commented on a discussion and encourage them to do the same. Please keep it up. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

thank you WhatamIdoing, --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

for you!Edit

Although we have not directly communicated with each other I have followed your diligent, fair and outstanding work towards making Wikipedia work in an otherwise unintelligible labyrinth. WikiProject Medicine is working at its best , better than formerly because of the team work you have promoted. I quit editing last year disappointed but you have tackled the same issue with more success and fairness. Stay vigilant for scholarship and justice! In the meantime have a cherry coke and a cheeseburger from me! Thank your for the vindication of my previous editing work! LeBassRobespierre (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |}


thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Waid's note.../ebolaEdit

Ozzie, I've had your page on my watch list because we work on the Ebola article together. I noticed that you deleted Waid's note. Was it by accident? I've known Waid for years and can hardly say how many times I've gone to her for advise. IMO, she's one of our best editors and I've never seen her to display the arrogance and lack of good intent that is not uncommon for this project. If she tried to help me I'd consider it an honor that she was willing to spend the time on me, a less experienced editor. Gandydancer (talk) 14:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

actually it was to place inline cites on articles that need it, which I will,(some individuals simply have a different way, though she is professional), ,,BTW now that I have your attention I wanted you to know its always been a pleasure to work with you (and I spoke with Brian he added some info to the article...he's OK), --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It's okay. I know he's thinking about it. There's no need to keep it visible. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I thank you for any advise... thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your work is appreciated! (wikiproject med)Edit

  Medical Content Creator Barnstar
Your work on the Cerebral amyloid angiopathy article is excellent and has made the encyclopedia a better place for medical content. Thank you for your hard work - it is noticed and appreciated. Best Regards,   Bfpage |leave a message  21:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)



thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Liberia/ebolaEdit

"On the same day, the tree were the outbreak began, was identified.[20]" That reference is about Liberia, so should I move it out of the Guinea section? Art LaPella (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Art LaPella..Art its this ref [21] and its in Guinea.thanks for checking I wish everyone were like you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Reedited. Art LaPella (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thanks Art--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Can I barrow your thoughts? Comment /Collaboration of the Month/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I have been working on Stab wound for a little bit and I am working to get it up to GA status hopefully but I really am sort of limited in what else I can add. It is a very niche subject and I have juiced all my sources dry. If you have a moment would you mind taking a look at it and giving your input? Anything is valued. Peter.Ctalkcontribs 14:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

absolutely, thank you for asking (and Myasthenia gravis )--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

MGEdit

I just want to thank you for all fo the hard work you put into MG over the past week, we have made a lot of progress. What else do you think we need to tackle before trying for GA? Peter.Ctalkcontribs 20:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Peter.Ctalkcontribs I would nominate it for GA now (it takes a while for the process ..in the meantime we could get a good CE on it)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Sounds good, before I do that though I want to try to find a proper source for the physical exam, probably need to find a review article from Up-To-Date or some other source. Will also try to expand the lead a slight bit and remove the refs to conform to MEDMOS. Will try to nom by the end of day. Also - know any good CE who could do a quick run through of it? Peter.Ctalkcontribs 14:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Peter.CtalkcontribsWikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests this is the official CE,..aweaome...good luck (collaboration of the month[22], as well)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Medical References /(wikiproject med)^Edit

You recently edited the article on Heyde's syndrome and added a lot of 'medical reference needed' tags with no explanation or anything else. Could you please check the talk page for that article and let me know what I need to change? There are a lot of old references in the text, but I think they are valuable. Thanks for your help. Michael Dacre (talk - contribs - email) 17:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

thank you for asking--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Minimally invasive/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa - just to say I've written on talk page. cheers --Iztwoz (talk) 07:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

for you!/(wikiproject med)^Edit

The page looks so good compared to this morning, great job! If you need any more help(on anything), just let me know, I am glad to help you out! XxX ellen

EllenvanderVeen (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

thank you (Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney article benefited alot from your input)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


Can you help on Post Ebola Eye image/ebolaEdit

Hi, I've uploaded an image to commons for this article, but being new to this stuff I wasn't able to provide necessary information on the copyrights status. The image actually is all around the internet and I'm fairly sure it's free. An admin on the commons told me that my only chance is to contact the original creator and ask for permission. I traced the image to here.(NYtimes article attributes it to them) But I was unable to find the image on that site, nor could I find the creator of the image.(though I found who the eye belonged to) I'm overwhelmed by the amount of work this needed and I feel like it's a newbie mistake. Is there an easy way to do this? The image obviously not essential, but I think it would be nice to have it. Hope you have time, thanks in advance. Darwinian Ape talk 21:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Darwinian Ape talk yes, thanks for asking--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks again, for your help. Darwinian Ape talk 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion /ebolaEdit

Hi Ozzie i need your input here User:BrianGroen/Ebola_virus_disease_in_Nigeria .. Kind Regards Brian BrianGroen (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

absolutely, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! (wikiproject med)Edit

  The Original Barnstar
For your work on Ischemic cardiomyopathy; we now have a great new article! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


thank you very much!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Shielding lotion Clinical Studies/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Thanks for taking time to reach out to me regarding my article. I do have a question regarding the Clinical studies section. I happen to have the clinical study documentation on hand, but I'm not sure these have actually been published online. How do I cite this properly? Can I just include the study title, ref number date and company that conducted the study? Thanks for your help. James Schultz (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I just read the article about Medical Citations and it stated that studies where animal test subjects are used do not qualify as a "Clinical Study" and should be referred to as "Pre-Clinical Studies". Each of these studies were conducted on laboratory animals. Should I list them as "Pre-Clinical" rather than "Clinical"? Thanks James Schultz (talk) 15:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

James Schultz (in response to both posts) ...yes you may list them consistent with Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles but first it needs to be PubMed indexed, (it needs to not be a primary study only with exceptions, are they included per Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)), any article (journal) needs to be a review or meta-analysis thus a secondary source (I should point out that it is important that you not have a conflict of interest with the article either as primary, secondary or corresponding author)....you may also use a source such as a position statement from CDC,WHO,HHS,NIH and so forth or a medical textbook, please feel free to ask should there be any questions, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Ozzie10aaaa. Don't quote me on this, but I believe the initial studies referred to were primary studies conducted for a particular manufacturer. In any event, I have removed them and found some on ClinicalTrials.gov. I only used completed studies with documented results. Thanks again for your help. If you have further suggestions to improve the article, I'd really appreciate it. James Schultz (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
will respond on article talk page, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Philly Medlibs Event Planning /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Thanks for your comment on my WikiProject Medicine Announcement. Is this something you would be interested in participating in? Not sure of your location- or would the project or the Wikipedia Foundation support or sponsor someone involved to attend and present? Feel free to contact me or pass along this request to others who might be interested/available on-wiki or by email (richardjam *at* gmail *dot* com) Richardjames444 (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Richardjames444 ...while I do live in Florida, I would probably have little problem attending (Spring 2016)...in regards to Wikipedia Foundation and funding probably DocJames would be most knowledgeable, in the meantime I will in fact pass this along to a couple of editors which should be interested...thank you for this very kind gesture--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate the input, and I'll update you as more details emerge.Richardjames444 (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!/ebolaEdit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
You are to be commended for your tireless work on the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa article. You are one of the few that have been willing to not only work on the article when the epidemic first broke out but to keep the article up-to-date with your timely addition of new information. Thanks Ozzie! Gandydancer (talk) 13:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Dispute resolution needed for Talk:Health care in the United States/(wikiproject med)^Edit

The discussion regarding an issue on article neutrality is currently occurring in: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. 2601:647:4601:4634:D455:1D6A:4C07:B030 (talk) 22:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

thank you for notification, will comment--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

have voted--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy Holiday/New YearEdit

Thank you kindly - the same to you. Keep up the good work, and happy editing! :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 12:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank youEdit

Thank you so very much for the very kind holiday wishes. You always so kind and courteous toward me - your positive attitude has a lot to do with my continued editing. Best Regards,

Barbara (WVS) (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC) aka Bfpage
thank you, Merry Christmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi OzzieEdit

Thank you for the xmas greetings. Dont take this the wrong way, but the bright red is so bright, and fugly, that I'm going to remove it as it hurts my eyes. It was nice of you though, thanks. -Roxy the dog™ woof 17:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

It's that time of year....Edit

 
Christmas tree worm, (Spirobranchus gigantic)
Time To Spread Some Happy Holiday Cheer!!
I decorated a special kind of Christmas tree in the spirit of the season.

What's especially nice about the digitized version is that it doesn't need water,

and it won't catch fire.
Wishing you a joyous holiday season...
...and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉

Atsme📞📧 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Pure pun-ishment. [23]



thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Thanks for your edits to party and play. Kind regards, -- The Anome (talk) 22:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

thank you (it's a very good article)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!/(wikiproject med)Edit

  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia Edit 2015. It is nice to have a WikiProject Medicine participant speak up in these more public channels. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


thank you ( as always)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Broken reference in Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa/ebolaEdit

Hi! Thanks for your recent edits to Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. I see that a broken reference has appeared in the intro to the article. I had a quick try at fixing it, but just made things worse, so I reverted my change. Could you please take a look to see if you can make a better fix? -- The Anome (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

your edit seems to have fixed it[24], thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 07:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's GreetingsEdit

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

thank you :-)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry ChristmasEdit

 
Merry Christmas!!
Hello, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!  

   –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 16:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


thank you (Merry Xmas)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Yo Ho HoEdit

Thanks for all you have done this year :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

thank you for your guidance--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Best wishes for the holidays...Edit

  Season's Greetings
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Shepherds (Poussin) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 10:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


thank you John, Merry Xmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Seasons GreetingsEdit

 
Seasons Greetings!
I've been hearing from the elves that you've been a little worried about how Santa's list is looking for you. They say he's almost done with his second check, and so far it looks like you've hardly been naughty at all! Thanks for the work you do and the help and nice words that you have shared with me. You have brought joy into my work here.

I wish you and your family Seasons Greetings and a very Happy New Year Gandydancer (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


thank you, Merry Xmas (its very good to work w/ you)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Ebola errataEdit

Glad you were able to track it down. Sorry I wasn't any help, but I was at the office all day. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

thank you anyway :-)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Alexa Brown/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I made a vote on Talk:Clyde cancer cluster. I encourage you highly to vote on whether Alexa should or shouldn't have a separate article. Thanks. Philmonte101 (talk) 03:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

will comment on article/talk, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ozzie10aaaa!Edit

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Neonatal infection/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I want to thank you for all your constructive edits to my editing in the past. The article I created, Neonatal infection is scheduled to appear on Main page sometime in the "Did you know..." section in about a week. If you would like to help make it even better, please feel free to polish it up with me. Thanks again and Best Regards,

Barbara (WVS) (talk) 13:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


Barbara (WVS) I'm honored and will take you up on that, thank you very much--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Knowledge Engine (Wikimedia Foundation)/(wikiproject med)^/Search engine MetaEdit

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!Edit

please help translate this message into the local language
  The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


thank you Doc James, this means a lot to me,I am very grateful, --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

question about RFC /(wikiproject med)^Edit

I was about to respond to the RFC re: Deepak Chopra under your comment, but I wanted to make sure I'm doing it right first... Am I supposed to reply directly on Talk:Deepak Chopra or is there a separate page like for AFDs? Also, is that the right place to go into detail about anything in the lead that I have an issue with or do you think it's only for discussing POV issues? Sorry this is a dumb question. I guess I never participated in in an AFC before. Permstrump (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Deepak_Chopra, yes comment at the talk page (RfC), please read the top of the talk page first for more information, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Pertinence /(wikiproject med)^Edit

I would suggest you think over your position concerning the pertinence of the image on bipolar disorder. It is present in numerous sources and strongly associated with the topic. CFCF 💌 📧 11:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I do believe you make a valid point, however Images should look like what they are meant to illustrate[25], I will think it over[26]...--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. /(wikiproject med)^Edit

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Wpegden (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

have commented, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey/(wikiproject med)^Edit

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

have answered, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! (wikiproject med)Edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you so much for taking the initiative to tidy up the article on medullary cystic kidney disease. I did not expect such a rapid response from anyone. Though I've been on Wikipedia for quite a long time, I still consider myself a newbie, and so I'm still learning proper etiquette. Thanks man! NJ (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


thank you for the opportunity to help w/ such an important article--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Article on Medullary cystic kidney diseaseEdit

Hey, I'm still working on the article for Medullary cystic kidney disease. Are you done with as everything you could think of? If so, I'll post on the WikiProject Medicine talk page to ask for additional input just in case. NJ (talk) 01:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

NJ ill finish it this week (ive been watching the article and you've made some great edits to the article!), thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

for you!Edit

Thank you so much for your work on medullary cystic kidney disease! I will learn a lot from your contributions. You have worked tirelessly on the article, and should be proud of your work. Cheers! NJ (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

thanks,NJ however I think this was a team effort, therefore thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Precious (wikiproject med)Edit

medical research

Thank you for quality contributions to medical articles such as Ebola and organ donation, for structuring Portal Anatomy and project work, for improving articles such as Ebola virus disease treatment research, for welcoming and remembering users, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)


thank you, this is very kind of you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 09:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests/GA/ebolaEdit





Your GA nomination of West African Ebola virus epidemicEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article West African Ebola virus epidemic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pbsouthwood -- Pbsouthwood (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of West African Ebola virus epidemicEdit

The article West African Ebola virus epidemic you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:West African Ebola virus epidemic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pbsouthwood -- Pbsouthwood (talk) 05:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)



Good work, A pleasure to work with you. You are welcome to provide any feedback you think may be useful or appropriate on my talk page. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

it was my pleasure to work with someone so professional as you, thank you truly--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


Issues with DYK nomination of West African Ebola virus epidemicEdit

Ozzie10aaaa, I just had to remove the transclusion of a non-existent nomination template for this article from the DYK nominations page. You'll want to consult the DYK instructions for nominators and follow the steps there. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. You have seven days to complete the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Never mind: I've restored it—I just saw your post on the DYK talk page, and fixed the nomination template. I'm still not sure how you managed to get one name for the template page and another inside that very same template, but it's all set now. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)



thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


DYK for West African Ebola virus epidemicEdit

 On 17 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article West African Ebola virus epidemic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/West African Ebola virus epidemic. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, West African Ebola virus epidemic), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 19/(wikiproject med)^/referencesEdit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti

  • New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
  • New Library Card Platform and Conference news
  • Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

Read the full newsletter



19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Review of article? Draft:Dan Riskin/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and would like to ask for advice from a top medical contributor. The page I've been editing is Dan Riskin. I think the page is ready to move out of draft space. Would you be willing to help me by reviewing it, providing feedback as needed, and moving it out of draft space if you think it's ready? I've been seeing a lot of bad information on people involved in value-based healthcare and would like to put up real, fact-based content. If I'm successful in this one, I want to move on to other key figures in the field. Thank you so much for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NimbleToad (talkcontribs) 23:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

have commented on draft/talk, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


Thank you so much for your comments! I'm only related in that I also work in value-based healthcare and am frustrated by how many people are claiming credit for hard work from a relatively small group of people. I'd like to put up pages for key people. I'll work on adjusting the article so it reflects why the figure is notable and only lists fact-based commentary. If those changes are made, is it a reasonable next step to move it out of draft space?NimbleToad (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)


as long as there is consensus on the talk page[31], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)


Thank you! Your revisions are great and make the page much more readable. I updated formatting and added citations where missing. I don't see any objection on the talk page. Could I ask you to please help in moving this out of draft space? NimbleToad (talk) 23:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


will respond at talk/article, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


Thanks. I've asked colleagues and they feel the information is balanced and represents important history as we go through rapid changes in health policy and clinical data use. Unfortunately, I don't know other Wikipedia editors to leave comments. I haven't seen any objections to move the page out of draft space. Once this is done, I'd like to go on to work on John Halamka, another influential individual in the field. Thanks for helping me to learn the process! NimbleToad (talk) 23:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


Sorry, I should have been more clear. I don't have permission to move this out of draft space. You offered to move it out of draft space as long as there is consensus on the talk page. You've made the article much stronger and there have been no objections in talk. Could you please help with the move out of draft space? Thanks! NimbleToad (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)



[32]posted at wikiproject med(if no answer, then ill have to move article, there should be more comments) in the future please comment at talk/article THX--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!/ebolaEdit

  The Original Barnstar
Congrats on the GA and DYK for the Ebola article. Very nice work indeed! Gandydancer (talk) 17:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
User:Gandydancer its you (and Brian) that led the way, and therefore your the one that should be commended (left note on your talk) thanks as always--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!/(wikiproject med)^Edit

 Hello, Ozzie10aaaa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


voted[33], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


A cup of coffee for you!/(wikiproject med)Edit

  I just taught an online Wikipedia class at Wikipedia:Cochrane online classes October 2016. I told the participants to check in at WP:MED for support. It happened that you responded to many of the participants. Thank you so much for that.

The students appreciated what you said. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


thank you (they ask great questions b/c they have a great teacher in you Blue Rasberry)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

Thanks for all your help re Influenza vaccine and health care workers. I will have time to sit down and go through your suggested references tonight. I greatly appreciate the helpful and positive feedback. JenOttawa (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@JenOttawa: you are very welcomed, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!Edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2017!

Hello! Thank you for your wishes, and I hope you have great holidays! Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

thank you(I know the WikiJournal of Medicine will be better than ever this coming year!)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


WikiJournal of Medicine /(wikiproject med)^Edit

 
WJM Poster (hyperlinked)


















  • per [34]/[35]
  • at work and post on some editors/talk here([36][37])
  • and have emailed several editors I know--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

xmasEdit

thank you, Merry Xmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays!Edit

Thank you so much for the holiday wishes! N. Jain talk to me 14:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!Edit

Hello, Ozzie10aaaa! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
N. Jain talk to me 14:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
thank you and Merry Xmas/New Year!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Best wishes for the holidays...Edit

Season's Greetings
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Kings (Gerard David, London) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thank you Johnbod, Merry Christmas to you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry ChristmasEdit

 
Merry Christmas Ozzie10aaaa!!
Hi Ozzie10aaaa, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!  

   –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 22:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thank you, Merry Christmas to you!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Yet anotherEdit


Merry
Rexxmas


--RexxS (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

thank you RexxS, Merry Christmas! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!Edit

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)  

thanks again Bzuk (Merry Christmas x2!)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Season's GreetingsEdit

 
His work for this year done, Santa heads north...

Season's greetings and best wishes for the coming year. (I guess that Santa felt that his reindeer needed a little rest before heading home.) Sincerely, Gandy



thank you Gandy, Merry Christmas and all the best in the coming year!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ozzie10aaaa!Edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Harry New Year to you too, all the best!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)




WHO Model List of Essential Medicines/Review for Featured listEdit



Wikipedia:Featured list criteria

  • Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  • Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  • Comprehensiveness.

(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.

  • Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  • Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.

(a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly

  • Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process
reviewed jan-feb 2017(copied from archive 1)

WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Over the last 4 years a number of us have been worked to improve all 414 medicines on this list. The leads of each item now provides a decent well referenced overview of the subject in question and an article exists for each of the medicines / combinations. The WHO just released an image under an open license for use to us. World Health Day is April 7th and 2017 also marks the 40 anniversary of the EML. Would be nice to get this ready for the main page for that date. I also believe it meets the FL criteria. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

comments Ozzie10aaaa

perWikipedia:Featured_list_criteria

  • Criterion 1- is consistent with professional standard [38]
  • Criterion 3- a. covers the scope of WHO Model List of Essential Medicines very well[40]
b. consistent with Wikipedia:Stand-alone_lists and does not violate Wikipedia:Content_forking
  • Criterion 4- African trypanosomiasis........ Medicines for the treatment of 1st stage African trypanosomiasis...seems to be "two" headers, would you be willing to merge or get rid of one of them?
b.could use between 2-5 images to bring more interest in the "list" for our readers?


--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Have adjusted the headers[41] let me know what you think. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  • perfect,and consistent with the rest of the list, thank you.
  • the other issue is images as indicated above (2-5 images) as our readers will be more interested when they see as well as read.[42] --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Okay will pull in a few more :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


as a result of [43] and [44][45][46][47][48][49] in reference to this Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates nomination I therefore




Reflist(OpenBiome)/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hey O. Hope all is well. I think the "2" is deprecated with "32em" prefered. Have adjusted here [52]. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


Paratonia ?/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I came across Paratonia on the WP:MED assessment page, someone's recently rewritten it and would like some help with getting the ugly tags off. They've said they're an expert in the field - could you please say hi to them? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

will look, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


Thank you for checking the page on paratonia. I read the guidelines for references and citations, unfortunately there are no secondary sources available (maybe in the future I will publish a review!), what I wrote is the best I can doLuciomarinelli (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


have responded on talk /article, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


I replied too, what you think? Luciomarinelli (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


[53]the second link, indicates all books that are available(and more) if you go to next page[54](even if you feel the first link/book[55] I indicated was not satisfactory, thank you...have posted at article talk as well)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


Hello, I added a recent book among those you suggested. Luciomarinelli (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


looks good[56]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


shall we remove the "multiple issues" warning and the "stub" flag? Luciomarinelli (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


done[57]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


Adjusted(MABp1)/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hey Ozzie. Have placed this article, MABp1 in WP:PHARM. IMO we should wait until a medication is avaliable / in us before adding it to WPMED. Your thoughts? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

@Doc James:agreed:-)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


I understand(Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine)/(med wikiproject)^Edit

...the esteem with which Doc is held at WP Medicine, and I share it. But when entering a complex discussion, is it not better to fully understand the issues involved, before taking a side (even with as easy as voting and side-taking is here)? Your work on the various of your editing projects makes clear you are capable of sophisticated and subtle understanding. The issues of our allowing self-published medical imagery (and the associated matter of our seeming lack of concern for patient consent) are things that could sink the ship. Please, if engaging there, read through the arguments and examples, and them vote. Thank you. Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I did[58], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


Health_effects_of_tobacco/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hey Ozzie,

Can you look the suggestion mentioned here ? KVDP (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

commented[59]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


New editorial board candidate/WikiJournal of Medicine (Wiki.J.Med)Edit

Hello Ozzie,

We have a new candidate for an editorial board position: Talk:WikiJournal of Medicine#Potential new board member
As a peer reviewer, I'd like you to participate in the vote.

Best regards,

Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

done[60]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)


A barnstar for you! (wikiproject med)Edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for all you help while I was without Internet :-) Home and back at it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


Doc James thank you!(you were missed)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


Edit summaries(Video game addiction)/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi there. This is just a friendly reminder that you should try to use edit summaries more often. For instance, in these edits you added and removed over 30,000 bytes. I see that you were just moving stuff around, but you easily could have explained that. That's all. Thanks for your contributions to that article! (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and I see you might have been responding to my post on the WikiProject Medicine talk page, so thanks for that as well. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
good tip, yes I did leave a note[61],thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!Edit

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


Doc James its an honor, thank you for guiding this medical project--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


2605:6000:ef43:8500:8d1d:42a:ea65:9ef5 (Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola outbreak 2017)/ebola2Edit

There is no need to discuss edits before they are made, per WP:BOLD; they should be discussed after they are reverted though, per WP:BRD. This looks to be a content dispute rather than disruptive editing. GiantSnowman 13:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

ok I will then address the IP after they have edited, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


The Signpost: 9 June 2017/WMF Elections (wikiproject med)^Edit

thanks(including newsletter below)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 02:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 1 – 14 June 2017Edit

Facto Post – Issue 1 – 14 June 2017
 

EditorialEdit

This newsletter starts with the motto "common endeavour for 21st century content". To unpack that slogan somewhat, we are particularly interested in the new, post-Wikidata collection of techniques that are flourishing under the Wikimedia collaborative umbrella. To linked data, SPARQL queries and WikiCite, add gamified participation, text mining and new holding areas, with bots, tech and humans working harmoniously.

Scientists, librarians and Wikimedians are coming together and providing a more unified view of an emerging area. Further integration of both its community and its technical aspects can be anticipated.

While Wikipedia will remain the discursive heart of Wikimedia, data-rich and semantic content will support it. We'll aim to be both broad and selective in our coverage. This publication Facto Post (the very opposite of retroactive) and call to action are brought to you monthly by ContentMine.

LinksEdit

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary (wikiproject med)Edit

A year ago ...
 
medical research
... you were recipient
no. 1448 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


User:Gerda Arendt thank you very much, its an honor--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)




Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thank you very kind!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Van Goethem syndrome/(wikiproject med)^Edit

The template you used to request the deletion of this article is only used for pages which meet the criteria for speedy deletion, and this doesn't. If you want this article to be deleted then you'll need to use the proposed deletion or articles for deletion processes. Hut 8.5 20:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

ok thank you, Ill do that[62](Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How an AfD discussion is closed)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


Sorry, the snowball clause doesn't work like that. If ten people had turned up to agree with you and nobody had disagreed then you might be able to argue that it could be closed early under the snowball clause, but one person isn't going to lead to an early closure. The discussion will be either closed or relisted after a week as per the usual procedure. Hut 8.5 20:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


thanks for clarification[63]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


Participate our study to help recruit editors forWPMED?/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa,

Thank you for responding my post on WPMED about our study, and hope you are interested in it. I wonder if you'd like to participate our study to recruit editors we recommend for WPMED? Please check out my user talk page for participation, and let me know if you have any question. Thanks! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

thank you for the invitation, I will consider it--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with the new Cochrane-Wikipedia Editors/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Thanks for your help with those new Cochrane Editors. Cochrane ran an editing workshop and it looks like they drummed up some interest. How did you reply to the person who did not sign their page? I have not figured out that trick :)

I will be away from my internet for a couple of days, but will be following up with these people and will support them as new editors.

Thanks again for all your friendly assistance and support in my own Wikipedia editing initiatives.

JenOttawa (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

you are very welcome!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


Moving content /Lissencephaly/(wikiproject med)^Edit

If you are removing large pieces of content in an article, in order to replace them elsewhere in the article, please remember to leave an edit summary to that effect, so it will not be mistaken for vandalism. GMGtalk 12:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

good point though I always put MEDRS/MEDMOS on second edit I will place it now before and after moving text, thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Ulnar neuropathy/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Ozzie: why did you remove my information about ulnar neuropathy? I’ve been treating it for many years. Can we discuss this? That was not added lightly or spur of the moment. Asherah12 Asherah12 (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

have left a note[65] on your talk page, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Illogical reversion Dysautonomia/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Ozzie: Why did you revert the placement of Mechanisms in Dysautonomia? I moved it because the section followed rather than preceded "The symptoms of Dysautonomia, which are numerous and vary widely for each individual, are due to inefficient or unbalanced efferent signals sent via both systems." The Mechanisms section explains "both systems"; it doesn't make sense to place the section after the reference. Shinju (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

have answered at your talk page[66](please see MEDMOS), thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


ArbCom 2017 election voter message?/{wikiproject med)^Edit

 Hello, Ozzie10aaaa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)



have voted[67] thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Would you be so kind and re-revert your revert of Glycogen storage disease type IX ?/(wikiproject med)^Edit

According to the OMIM review on GSD IXd, Burwinkel et al. (2003) is the last word from the medical research community on the genetics of GSD IXd. Yeah, I know, that is kinda unsatisfactory – but then again, as I have written here, GSD IX is quite rare. If you have more extensive reviews, or newer research, I am all ears, and more than willing to include that – in the meantime, could you be so kind and re-revert your revert? Tony Mach (talk) 11:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

have posted at [68] thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please can you review ..Lytico-Bodig disease/(wikiproject med)^Edit

.. this edit [69]?

Adding this to the infobox is misleading. It is clear from the article that it is NOT an inherited disease. Familial (or, rather, on the latest theory, commensal), but not genetic. Philip Trueman (talk) 09:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

have answered on your talk[70] thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


It is clear from one of these pages you cite that there is disagreement among the primary sources. One ".. concluded that purely environmental, mendelian dominant, and mendelian recessive hypotheses of causation could be rejected." I repeat: adding this to the infobox misrepresents what the secondary sources are saying. It is not even certain that there is a genetic component at all. Philip Trueman (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


have posted at [71], thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


have withdrawn image per [72]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Yo Ho HoEdit


thank you, Merry Christmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too!Edit

And in return,


thank you, Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Best wishes for the holidays...Edit

  Season's Greetings
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Nativity scenes attributed to Zanobi Strozzi is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


thank you, Merry Christmas/Happy New Year to you!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons GreetingsEdit

"tis the season...."Edit

Gandydancer (talk) 22:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

thanks Gandy, Merry Christmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!Edit

Thanks for thinking of me and for leaving a Christmas message. I hope that you have a very nice holiday and I am looking forward to seeing you on WikiProject Med in 2018. Warm regards,

Jenny JenOttawa (talk) 03:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!Edit


Merry Christmas and the very best in the New Year to you!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry X-masEdit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.


Doc James all the best in the coming year, Merry Christmas!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Yet anotherEdit


Merry
Rexxmas
2018


--RexxS (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

RexxS Merry Christmas & Happy New Year--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' GreetingsEdit

...to you and yours, from Canada's Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)






thank you, Merry Christmas to you([73]two cards are better than one )--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

HNYEdit

  Happy New Year!

Best wishes for 2018, —PaleoNeonate – 22:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


thank you PaleoNeonate, and Happy New Year to you!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ozzie10aaaa!Edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


the very best 2018 to you and all your dreams!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Sources?Thrombocytopenia /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Thought ADAM is hosted by the NIH they are not a very good source.

I would use this instead https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/thrombocytopenia

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

thanks for improving the source, I agree--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


Further reading and external links, wondering your thoughts on generally putting this together? They are typically the same / similar? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


they could be placed together, however if the reader sees that one is at least, a subsection(=== ===)of the other to better define the difference it would be good... having said that should you feel strongly about joining both w/out any 'differentiation' I would agree and understand--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


Multiple system atrophy/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi, Ozzie10aaaa, not sure why you removed the external links from this article, as this is one place where they are deemed to be appropriate. Were they in some way flawed? Let me know, as I just replaced them in the relevant "External links" section.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quisqualis,so...if we go to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#External links it indicates Don't use external links...to web-based or email-based support groups for patients, professionals, or other affected people (even if run by a charitable organization)...(will post on talk/article as well)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


Request for more input in Antibiotics Talk/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hello! I see you commented at the top of the discussion in Antibiotics Talk

I wonder if you could come back and lay eyes on the reference in question and comment on whether it's a reliable biomedical secondary source per WP:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#Definitions. I haven't made a lot of edits, so I may be applying my professional understanding inappropriately, but it seems like all four of the references I referred to in talk are considered reliable secondary sources here as well. You've been around for a while, so if you look at the actual references and say they're not, then I know i've misunderstood. If I can get some consensus on whether those sources are appropriate, then it will be worth my time to rewrite as suggested in talk. If not, I won't bother.

This is the reference that was originally used. It's a perspective's article published in Science (see the publishers requirements for that type of article: http://www.sciencemag.org/authors/science-information-authors [1]

Here are the additional references mentioned in talk. I'll use web links here: Science, a news article (on the topic in general, not on the previous perspectives article) http://science.sciencemag.org/content/324/5935/1637.long

A review in Chemical Reviews, also on the topic in general (pub med central link to full text) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173521/

A more recent review (12/2017) in Cell Press, that includes a section on the topic: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=28688575 (pubmed link) http://www.cell.com/trends/microbiology/pdf/S0966-842X(17)30148-8.pdf (link to pdf, requires subscription)

Please let me know if requesting a comment in this way isn't appropriate. I'm new at making edits, and I want to make sure any contributions I make to the community are done in the right way! Dbhall200:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

since I feel there is nothing further to add(I have been watching this talk/article)per [74] would also suggest Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard where I would contribute, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

refEdit

  1. ^ Ratcliff, William Croft; Denison, Robert Ford (2011-04-29). "Alternative Actions for Antibiotics". Science. 332 (6029): 547–548. doi:10.1126/science.1205970. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 21527704.


Archiving?Help:Archiving_a_talk_page/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hello, I have noticed you have a tendency to add archives to talk pages. For example here and here. May I ask why you do this? Or if there is a specific guideline I can read about this? WP:ARCHIVE notes in the lead that when a Talk page exceeds 75,000 bytes it is recommended to archive per the talk page guidelines. Linked examples above were just 14,000 and 21,000 bytes respectively. --Treetear (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

so..if we look at[75] and then Help:Archiving_a_talk_page the first sentence indicates... It is customary to periodically archive old discussions on a talk page when that page becomes too large. Bulky talk pages may be hard to navigate, contain obsolete discussion, or become a burden for users with slow Internet connections or computers....the last discussion on that page was Aug. 2015(2.5 years ago)[76]....the aforementioned 'archive help page' further indicates ,However, when to archive, and what may be the optimal length for a talk page, are subjective decisions that should be adapted to each case --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


Thank you for the answer. If we use the same first quote with different emphasis:
It is customary to periodically archive old discussions on a talk page when that page becomes too large. Bulky talk pages may be hard to navigate, contain obsolete discussion, or become a burden for users with slow Internet connections or computers.
In my opinion, it is a bit overkill to archive Talk pages with only around 15 or less sections (each with only a few comments), seeing there are no active discussions popping up recently that could re-populate the Talk page. I see no use in having an empty Talk page with an archive, compared to a small Talk page with no recent discussion. The previous discussion is useful to have visible for readers and editors and should not be 'hidden' or be archived to give the appearance that the discussions are finished. Occassionally, comments are given on older discussions, especially on pages where there are not many sections on the Talk page. Even if no comments would pop up in 2.5 years, maybe what's stopping it is that previous discussions on a topic have already commented what the editor had in mind suggesting.
I think you may have misread the Guidelines and missed the necessary point that archiving suggestedly only should be considered when a page is large or "bulky", not necessarily when nobody has commented in a while. --Treetear (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


perHelp:Archiving_a_talk_page, However, when to archive, and what may be the optimal length for a talk page, are subjective decisions that should be adapted to each case...is clear IMO, thank you(besides if there is any particular article/talk you think needs to be reexamined , just revert)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


TextWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/(wikiproject med)^Edit

This did not appear to format properly.[77] Feel free to try again. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Doc James actually its suppose to look like a combination of both images[78]<span style="position:absolute;top:-130px;left:-185px;z-index:100;background-color:" class="noprint">[[File:WHO Rod.svg|110px|link=Main Page]]</span>...what should I change?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


Hum. Not sure myself. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


[79]?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)



Annular pancreas?/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi, Ozzie10aaaa, could you check the voice, please? I have done many integrations, but my English is quite poor... Thank you--Frivadossi (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

ok will answer at talk/article[81], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Section naming and ordering for symptom related articles/(wikiproject med)^Edit

We generally use a different layout per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles#Signs_or_symptoms

Thus I have switched some of your changes back around. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

in Chest pain and Cough you are correct( long day thanks)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


No worries. Thanks for all your updating by the way :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


Re: User_talk:Yair_rand/interwikiwatchlist.js/ for(wikiproject med)^Edit

I am not currently using it. I do not know if it works now or not. Try it out. The instructions are at the top of

Ask for help there and at User talk:Yair rand - He is still editing. --Timeshifter (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

[82] I've tried several times(and left a message w/ Yair rand[83]), thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 09:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)


Thrombocytosis /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi Ozzie - i asked for a page move earlier - Essential thrombocytosis to Essential thrombocythemia. This was because it was the name used on the page, in the infobox and in the refs. I've just looked at the page thrombocytosis which you edited recently - and thought i'd bring it to your attention - both pages ought to use the same name. Ngrams favour essential thrombocythemia but favour thrombocytosis. The page was moved - any thoughts? thanks (and a late thanks for all your past thanks) --Iztwoz (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

very good idea[84]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


But ought the thrombocytosis page be moved too? thanks--Iztwoz (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


tried to move but it says administrator needed? apparently Thrombocythemia exists as a redirect, and therefore needs an administrator(?Doc James) to move--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


i'll put it through Req moves page - best --Iztwoz (talk) 06:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


Encephalitis /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi Ozzie,

You removed the link to the Encephalitis Society on the Encephalitis page? Can I ask why? And can you give me some guidance as to how we can correct it?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewPitt (talkcontribs) 08:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#External links....

Don't use external links:

  • that lead to information already included in the article
  • to web-based or email-based support groups for patients, professionals, or other affected people (even if run by a charitable organization)
  • to local, state, or regional charities, hospitals, clinics, or programs, or to meetings or events in a single location
  • to personal experiences or survivor stories
  • that recruit for clinical trials, sell products, or raise money...thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


Cheers, Ozzie.
I'd (respectfully) argue against some of those points which are relevant to us. Namely, that we are not purely web or email based: we are a dedicated society which provides accredited, evidence-based, peer-reviewed info. Indeed, some of the authors used as references are members of our Scientific Advisory Panel. We do exist in bricks and mortar (I assure you!) and provide global services. Along the same lines, we are not local, state or regional - we are an international organisation. Thanks - love to hear your thoughts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewPitt (talkcontribs) 11:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)



any further inquires should be taken to User talk:Doc James, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!Edit

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


Doc James its your strength and leadership ability that has made this project one of the top and most viewed by our readers, so therefore thank you for your guidance--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:24, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


Caudal regression syndrome external links/(wikiproject med)^Edit

In this edit to Caudal regression syndrome, you removed several external links as inappropriate. While I might agree with some of your choices, might I inquire about some others? Specifically

The first is the only known organization that deals specifically with this condition, and the second is a nationally recognized organization whose resources for rare diseases and conditions are widely valued. I believe these two links fall within the policy outlined by WP:EL for links that can provide the reader with more information than can conveniently be included within the encyclopedia article. Cousendux (talk) 14:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

so...[85]is a patient advocate, while [86] is as well.Therefore, I would point out Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#External links...Don't use external links
  1. that lead to information already included in the article
  2. to web-based or email-based support groups for patients, professionals, or other affected people (even if run by a charitable organization)
  3. to local, state, or regional charities, hospitals, clinics, or programs, or to meetings or events in a single location
  4. to personal experiences or survivor stories
  5. that recruit for clinical trials, sell products, or raise money...thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


Unicentric Castleman disease Article structure /(wikiproject med)^Edit

I noticed that you changed the organization of the unicentric castleman disease article I wrote. Sorry to re-edit this question, initially I preferred the classification section rather than the signs and symptoms, but I think that does work. I did prefer having a separate section for classification at the beginning of the article as it is critical to understanding the disease. Please let me know if you are comfortable with me moving the classification section back. I am new to wiki and did not want to overturn your changes as you are a much more experienced editor. Thanks CDK55 (talk) 13:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

CDK55 per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles either way is fine,therefore please replace the classification again at the start of body(of the article) thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


ITN recognition for 2018 Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak/ebola3Edit

 On 21 May 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thank you(and to all who worked on the article)!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


Monomelic amyotrophy peer review and transfer help/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hello User talk:Ozzie10aaaa. I'm lost in the labyrinthine process of swapping the revised article that we've been working on that is in my Sandbox: REVISED Monomelic amyotrophy for the existing one Monomelic amyotrophy. Thanks for your help improving the article.

GeeBee60 (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

will look,left note on your talk[87]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)


Looks like they resurrected Sinclair method / The Sinclair Method after that 2015 AfD /(wikiproject med)^Edit

As per the suggestion on the closing admin's talk page, I am pinging active editors who voted on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sinclair_Method_(2nd_nomination) a few years ago about what happened to that page. Within a month of the original Sinclair Method (currently a redirect) article being deleted, The Sinclair Method (also a redirect) was created; that was moved to Sinclair method and finally made in to a "soft" (i.e. history preserved) redirect; here is the history of that article. I myself have restored Sinclair Method as a redirect, for pragmatic reasons: The page http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/10/26/alcoholics-anonymous-much-more-than-you-wanted-to-know/ has a link to the old Sinclair Method article, and I think a link to a short summary is more useful for readers than a dead link. (I personally think The Sinclair Method probably doesn't work, since the same treatment has only shown a modest effect when other scientists than Sinclair try to replicate the results, but I'm biased towards 12-step approaches, WP:NOTAFORUM and all that) Defendingaa (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

thank you[88]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

geed Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Haha, I was wondering what "geed" meant. Because you put it in italics, I inferred that it was a deliberate spelling. Best wishes, Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

yes it was a mistake when I sit a certain distance from the monitor I cant see too well(I seem to have myopia in one eye),unfortunately its not the first time Ive had unusual typos, thank you for mentioning it, should you see anything similar in the future please correct it as it undoubtedly will happen again at some point(I'm usually very close to the monitor to see clearly)thank you Axl--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


Please provide detailed explanation for revertCerebrovascular disease/(wikiproject med)^Edit

No co relation with diabetes and acute cerebrovascular disease (Stroke)

1. Total number of hospital stays in usa 32,371,800..

2. Total number of hospital stays of diabetis as principal diagnosis 512,500. And diabetis is secondary diagnosis 6,290,000.

3. Acute cerebrovascular disease (stroke) patients with diabtis as principal or secondary diagnosis 153,800. Finally Cerebro vascular disease occurred 2.4% of diabetic people .

4. In this total number of hospital stays , 892300 patients for stayed in hospital for Acute cerebrovascular disease (stroke).2.4%

5. Final conclusion is Acute cerebrovascular disease occurred in same % in diabetic and non diabetic people.

6. There is no any co relation with diabetes and cerebrovascular disease


Statastical and Research Evidence : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK63493/

If any one want to revert this ,please provide valuable explanation. I am medical doctor , i was submitted the same issue to world health organization and got appreciation from who. Generally stroke occurs at old age people. so old age general public and diabetic people suffer with chronic diseases like diabetes and hypertension. Due to this reason a common miss concept occurs diabetes is causative factor for stroke . Please read some more information about this statistical records .If you want i can provide some more information on this concept.

(Subrahmanya preethamm (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC))

will respond on your talk/page[89], thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


ThanQ ...i will provide 2017 primary and secondary sources to confirm my argument shortly (Subrahmanya preethamm (talk) 13:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC))


I was updated information(Subrahmanya preethamm (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC))


will look, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

RE Myasthenia gravis/(wikiprojedt med)^Edit

I wasn't aware primary sources should be avoided. Thanks for pointing that out to me. I understand and appreciate the reasoning. However, I'd think for something like establishing a "relationship," a primary source would be acceptable. Metaquanta (talk) 04:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#MEDRSis very clear on this--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


New Page Patrol?Edit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa,

I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join New Page Patrol, and from your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; we could use some additional help from an experienced user like yourself. We could use a good medical editor like yourself on the team.

Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR.

Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


Watch a quick video tour



will review processWikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer, thank you for the consideration!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer grantedEdit

Hi Ozzie10aaaa. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator. ~ Amory (utc) 20:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

thank you!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018Edit

 
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Not everything needs an infobox /(wikiproject med)^Edit

I noticed that you've recently added a bunch of blank infoboxes to a handful of pages; if there is no content in an infobox, there is no point in adding it to an article. Would you please consider self-reverting those additions? Primefac (talk) 14:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

well actually, they are for diagnostic test and serve the fact that if information is available, then it can be added in the future--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


Yes, and if in the future there is information, the infobox can be added. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


responded at at VPT--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


A barnstar for you!/ebola4Edit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Once again the leading editor of one of our Ebola articles! What a fine job you have done with the 2018 Équateur province Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak. Congrats to you Ozzie! Gandydancer (talk) 22:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


thank you very much Gandy!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


graph created for N. Kivu outbreak(second outbreak)Edit

 
Democratic Republic of the Congo Graph(N. Kivu, as well as further areas)






--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

 
Graph ,2 Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak 2018(North Kivu and other area)









 
Bar graph of Democratic Republic of the Congo outbreaks 1976-present
















 
2018 Kivu Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak (total cases-death as of Oct.16









NPR Newsletter No.13Edit

monthly newsletter

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Other
Moving to Draft and Page Mover
  • Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
  • If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
  • Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
  • The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
  • The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

  • Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
  • In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
  • MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
  • User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
  • User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
  • User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
  • User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
  • User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14Edit

monthly newsletter
 
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
  • ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
  • There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)


thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Dawn Sumner NPR/BLP(astrobiologist)Edit

Thanks, Ozzie for reviewing this page. I have studied your edits and agree with many. I do think the External Links section is appropriate though WP:EL, without the Google Scholar link. What do you think? Okay if I try a revert of parts? BrucePL (talk) 17:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

responded[90] thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


Ozzie. I'd like to try and revise the outreach section to make it more neutral. BrucePL (talk) 16:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)


BrucePL if it is more neutral, then ok, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Request to submit Wikipedia article to Wiki.J.MedEdit

I have nominated the some Wikipedia articles (that have significant contributions from you) for review through Wiki.J.Med. I need to ask you whether you would like to have your name (original name) with affiliations included in the list of authors, or at least your pseudonymous username, and whether you would like act as the corresponding author of those articles. It would be appreciable if you can join in and help to upgrade the article(s) as they undergo review. I myself would be joining in and would try to help though the review process (and possibly prior to that as well). Seeking your cooperation. You can respond to this message or contact me privately. Diptanshu 💬 18:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

have answered[91] and would answer in the affirmative to your post above, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 
Hello, Ozzie10aaaa. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I have taken the liberty to add some code to your page to ease the navigation. Feel free to remove it if you do not like it. I also welcome you to archive some of the earlier discussions on your talk page. Diptanshu 💬 04:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I've now imported Dyslexia, West African Ebola virus epidemic and Hepatitis E to v:WikiJournal Preprints/Dyslexia, v:WikiJournal Preprints/West African Ebola virus epidemic and v:WikiJournal Preprints/Hepatitis E. Thank you for bearing with us whilst we sort out this part of the process. We're still working out the best ways for Wikipedia articles to be submitted! I've added the template:article info template to the top, which has a few parameters to fill in. It would be ideal if you could also fill in the template:fig template to add image attributions. I'm looking forward to seeing them progress! Whenever you're ready to submit one, just fill in this authorship declaration form. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 12:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
have /am filling out forms thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

2018 Kivu Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak/ebola5Edit

Hi there, looks like your recent edit of 2018 Kivu Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus outbreak added an odd reference. Please see here - it's the "xref" changes right at the top. I'd fix it myself, but I'm not sure how. Would you take a look when you get a moment? Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

thank you very much for the notice, Im not entirely certain how it may have occurred, I suspect the mouse pasted a prior reference(plus I don't see very well from a distance), thank you again--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Dyslexia page Wiki.J.MedEdit

Hi, thanks for nominating the article! Who will be authors listed on this? Forbero (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

it will be based on [92]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)


Hi Ozzie, I have not been editing on Wikipedia for some years now. Too many other editors banding together marketing various programs and outdated concepts. If only thye would base editing on international research best wishes dolfrog — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolfrog (talkcontribs)


Dolfrog,it is great to hear from you, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Please clarify re: copyvio/NPREdit

Hi there. Regarding this edit can you please clarify? --Muhandes (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

per beginning of paragraph, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


I believe you got it the other way around. That article is using text which I wrote for Wikipedia, almost verbatim. --Muhandes (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


seems to be this source[93], its about 2 or 3 lines, if you want just paraphrase and put it back, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


I believe you got things mixed. Here is my original edit from August 2017. The article was published in 2018. The article is the one who is violating Wikipedia's CC BY-SA, don't you think? --Muhandes (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


User:Diannaa your opinion please? thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


You can see at the very bottom of this pdf version of the article that it was published in their September-December 2017 issue, and we have had it since August 2017. So they copied from Wikipedia rather than the other way around. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


thank you Diannaa, have restored[94]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


Apology accepted ;) --Muhandes (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hello,

I wanted to share a follow-up to an RfC you participated in from late 2016/early 2017. It was regarding making certain warning templates visible on mobile. The Readers web team has been working to improve how these templates appear on the mobile website. I shared an announcement with communities today that covers what is happening. If you have any interest, I encourage your support in giving feedback on the project page or helping update templates of this nature with some of our recommendations.

Thank you, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15Edit

monthly newsletter
 

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Ozzie10aaaa,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
  • Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message/{wikiproject med)^Edit

 Hello, Ozzie10aaaa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)


voted[95],thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

2018 Kivu Ebola outbreak/ebola5Edit

Timeline of reported cases and deaths[27]

The case fatality rate on 2018-11-26 is 57 , NOT 52. I know that in the article you are referring to it says 52, but that number is wrong.

241 / (374+47) * 100 = 57 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.99.216.43 (talk) 01:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

done[96], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)


Not that it can be included in Wikipedia, but i have access to a neat powerpoint slide prepared for Kibali Gold Mine - that I do some consulting for - which puts into perspective the areas of both the outbreak and the military unrest. I was supposed to go there in November, but didnt, and i will wait for everything to settle down before i go there again. If i can somehow get an email address i can send it to you. Matilda Maniac (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


that is very kind of you, Special:EmailUser/Ozzie10aaaa it could prove useful for the article, thank you again--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


A Shaker Christmas greetingEdit

  A Shaker Christmas wish
Give good gifts, one to another
Peace, joy and comfort gladly bestow
Harbor no ill 'gainst sister or brother
Smooth life's journey as you onward go.
Broad as the sunshine, free as the showers.
So shed an influence blessing to prove;
Give for the noblest of efforts your pow'rs;
Blest and be blest, is the law of love.

--Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:01, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

thank you, Merry Xmas--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too!Edit

Thank you for the holiday note. I hope that you have a very nice Christmas! See you (online) in the New Year on WP:MED. JenOttawa (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

thanks, Happy Holidays--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)


NPR Newsletter No.16Edit

monthly newsletter

Hello Ozzie10aaaa,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


A barnstar for you!/New Page PatrolEdit

  The Original Barnstar
For reviewing TAGSAM. Thank you. Fotaun (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


thank you, very good article--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


Merry X-masEdit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.


thank you, and Merry Christmas to you Doc James--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


Yo Ho HoEdit

ϢereSpielChequers 13:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy new Year to you, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Peace Dove ChristmasEdit

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

These words pretty much describe you, my friend: One of the nicest and most tolerant people here and a true gift for Wikipedia. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you! Gandydancer (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


those are very kind words Gandy, Ive said it before you are the best medical editor Ive worked with and I consider having done so a privilege, Merry Christmas to you and the very best New Year ...Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New YearEdit

 
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

Hi Ozzie10aaaa, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,

   –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 14:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


thank you, Merry Christmas to you!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


Best wishesEdit

  Season's Greetings
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Shepherds (Cariani) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 10:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


Johnbod the very best Christmas and New Year to you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year !!!Edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.


Marry Christmas/Happy new Year to you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


XmasEdit

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)



Merry Christmas to you and thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!Edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Ozzie10aaaa, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.


thank you, Merry Christmas to you and your family and Happy new Year--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

And a Happy New YearEdit


Merry
Rexxmas
2018



thanks RexxS, Merry Xmas and Happy New Year--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:05, 25 December 2018 (UTC)


Brain Preservation Foundation/(wikiproject med)Edit

Hello Ozzie. I don't have a lot of experience with Wikipedia. Can you please tell me why you thought the Prize section wasn't relevant, and deleted it? It's the biggest achievement from the organisation. Thanks. --Mati Roy 27 December 2018

answered on your talk[97], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)


Thanks for your response. I implemented the changes you recommend. I also wonder why you removed the logo? In their footer on their website they mention that they waived the copyrights. Please let me know. Thank you.--Mati Roy 27 December 2018


[98]answered--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


It just seems more complete with the logo. No conflict of interests. Thanks. --Mati Roy 27 December 2018


thank you for response--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ozzie10aaaa!Edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


and Happy New Year too you... may all good things come your way--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


GGSE-1/New Page PatrolEdit

  Space Pioneer Award
Thank you for reviewing GGSE-1! :) Neopeius (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


thank you,its a very good article!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


Help with editing a page N-localizer/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I’m new to Wikipedia. I see that you have previously edited the N-localizer page, so could you please help me to edit that page?

I’ve moved Figure 1 out of the info box, added a discussion that ties Figures 1-3 together, and added a discussion of the Sturm-Pastyr localizer. However, Figure 3 doesn’t line up with Figures 1 and 2 but instead is lower on the page. Can you please help me to fix this problem? Thanks! Lunqvist (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

fixed,left message on your page,thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Schinzel-Giedion syndrome /(wikiproject med)^Edit

My brother has this rare syndrome, and has a very aggressive form of it as well. If there are any questions regarding Schinzel Giedion syndrome I would love to help as much as possible! Lexi mara (talk) 08:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

have answered[99], thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

NORD/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Does fairly good reviews of rare diseases. I think they are generally okay. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

ill add[100] it back to Hypocalcaemia--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


Parameter 'thumb'/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi Ozzie, when you add an image to an infobox, like this one-Apocrine gland carcinoma, can you try to remember not to include the |thumb parameter with the image filename, please? The infobox already deals with the image position and size, and the thumb parameter just gets treated as an invalid parameter. That places the article in Category:Pages using infobox medical condition with unknown parameters, which I'm trying to reduce from its present 469 members (so that I can clean up the template). It only had 466 yesterday and it's quite frustrating trying to get the number down. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

no problem, thanks for heads up--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


User contributions Crawdaunt Howardula aoronymphium/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hey,

Glad to fill in some blanks. I am loosely related to the topics as a former colleague of a researcher who works on the Drosophila*Spiroplasma*Howardula system. Crawdaunt (talk) 20:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

have left a note on your talk[101]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
I previously read and understood the context of COI, and am fully aware of the biases I can have consciously and unconsciously. I would like to know who can possibly write an article on the topics I contributed to (basic species information) without having been educated somewhat of A) their existence, B) their use in research. I did not declare COI because I as I said, I am loosely connected, but I am not an active researcher in the field nor do I have an active relationship in the field. If this qualifies as COI, I admit I am unsure of exactly what I can write about on Wikipedia. Please advise on how I can continue writing on topics of which I am knowledgeable without being blocked by COI concerns.
p.s. reading this... as text is void of inflection, please understand I am not trying to be snarky. I am just a bit perplexed where the line is between educated and unrelated vs. educated and related. Surely the degree of COI falls on a spectrum, where above some arbitrary threshold it can be deemed inappropriate. But this also implies below said arbitrary threshold it is appropriate. - Crawdaunt


[102]answered on your talk, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


Yes, Dr. Steve Perlman. However, if you look at the number of publications relating to D. neotestacea, you will find that a research group off-shooting from John Jaenike is responsible for almost the entirety of research related to D. neotestacea. It is not a highly competitive field. As far as I am aware, labs actively doing research with D. neotestacea include: John Jaenike's lab at the University of Rochester, Kellie Dyer's lab (former post-doc of Jaenike), and Steve Perlman's lab (former post-doc of Jaenike). I am happy to provide the google scholar search return for "D. neotestacea", which you will see returns results almost entirely from John Jaenike, Kellie Dyer, or Steve Perlman. Indeed, Jaenike is an author on every publication on the first three page of results directly related to D. neotestacea (owing to his starting in this field in the 1970s), many of which are co-authored with Dr. Steve Perlman pertaining to D. neotestacea*Spiroplasma*Howardula interactions. K. Dyer's lab and S. Perlman's lab also focus on population genetics in the species group. So pretty much all references to D. neotestacea with respect to Howardula, or Spiroplasma, are attached to J. Jaenike and/or S. Perlman. Please see Google Scholar search results, and particularly note in papers where D. neotestacea is in the title, the senior author is almost always either Jaenike, Perlman, or Dyer: https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?start=0&q=drosophila+neotestacea&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
I wrote the H. aoronymphium page after seeing it referenced in the Drosophila falleni page, but H. aoronymphium had not yet been created. I mentioned D. neotestacea on the H. aoronmyphium page, and subsequently wrote a page for D. neotestacea as one was not yet written in English (though D. neotestacea had an entry in 6 other languages). I hope this clarifies the reason why the authors attached to J. Jaenike, S. Perlman, and K. Dyer appear so frequently in the D. neotestacea page. - Crawdaunt


thank you for your response--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!Edit

  The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Doc James thank you for being the inspiration that helps all medical editors do their best!, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


Congratulations and Thank You!Edit

I noticed the 2018 editor stats. Wow! Thank you for your dedication to this project! JenOttawa (talk) 01:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

that's very kind of you, however we should collectively thank Doc James for leading by example for all of us, thank you again, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


I definitely agree @Doc James:. Have a nice day! JenOttawa (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


Reference for "March hematuria" /(wikiproject med)^Edit

Hi, you have reverted my adding a reference for the existence of "march hematuria", which I merely copied from mechanical hemolytic anemia. Your reversion edit did not give any information about why the reference is not applicable. I would be very interested to understand the basis for that reversion. Thanks, 192.118.27.253 (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

if you take a look at edit summary it says MEDRS, which can be seen hereWikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine).This applies specifically to the date of the reference in question as they may not be older than 5 years(older) from publication, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


OK, this is interesting. Does this mean I should edit the lead for HIV/AIDS, remove the three references, which are all older than 5 years old, which confirm that HIV causes AIDS, and add a "citation needed" instead? Somehow, I don't think that would improve that article. There are countless medical conditions which are no longer being studied because of advances in medicine or accepted medical knowledge, or other societal changes (for "march hematuria", for example, the replacement of marching with the use of better transportation methods in wartime) and there are no recent sources for them. Although MEDRS does not explicitly allow use of older references in this case, it hints at the necessity for them by saying that "History sections often cite older work". 192.118.27.253 (talk) 11:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


there seem to be references here"Mechanical hemolytic anemia - PubMed - NCBI". www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 13 February 2019. and here"Mechanical hemolytic anemia - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 13 February 2019.--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


Thanks for the help for finding better references and improving my Wikipedia skills. Based on your edit, I still would like to hear your opinion of why a troll couldn't edit HIV/AIDS in the way I proposed and cite MEDRS as justification. 192.118.27.253 (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


your welcomed(it terms of HIV/AIDS its 1. semi protected[103] and 2. I was unable to find your specific edit?)thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome/(wikiproject med)^Edit

I responded to your edits on the talk page.

Thanks, Thomas pow s (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

have responded, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


I responded again. Thomas pow s (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


as have I,in the future please respond at article/talk as I am watching it thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


NPR Newsletter No.17Edit

monthly newsletter

Hello Ozzie10aaaa,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


External links? Klaus Peter Jantke/New Page PatrolEdit

Hello Ozzie, thank you for reviewing and improving my articles, but I don't understand, why do you remove the external links? Could you please explain? --Allexkoch (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

external links are permitted however [104] seemed to go somewhat "overboard", and begins to look like WP:PROMO[105]. If you stick to one EL that would be OK--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)



Thank you for your explanation. I always have difficulties with these technical details and really much to learn. --Allexkoch (talk) 22:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for all the work organizing articles/(wikiproject med)^Edit

When you added new section can you add a few lines of text rather than the "empty section" tag? CDC or WHO often cover the issue. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

good idea, will do so going forward, thank you Doc James--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


Citation bot/(wikiproject med)^Edit

Feel free to run again here. [106] It does not work for me on this IP. Was reverting all the spelling changes by the IP before you. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Doc James thanks for 'heads up'--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


Cantu syndrome/(wikiproject med)^Edit

There is a graphic showing the inheritance of this condition. This graphic is widely used for other diseases. Yet you consider this inclusion to be disruptive.

Would you care to explain your logic? Virion123 (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

you've placed it twice where the infobox is suppose to be[107], Ill move it down and downsize it[108]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


Sounds like a plan. I have a suggestion. Change the graphic. Cardiomegaly is not specific for this condition. Put this latter image elsewhere in the page. This would make this page consistent with other genetic diseases with known inheritance. Virion123 (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


according to NIH(which uses Orphanet) cardiomegaly is present 80-99%[109]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


I am afraid I don't really see the point of that last remark. It may be a common feature but there are many causes of cardiomegaly. Don't worry I am not going to move things around just because I can. Such things are so trivial its not worth my time bothering with them. Virion123 (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


the reference speaks for itself--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Ozzie10aaaa".