Star of life2.svgThis user is a member of
WikiProject Medicine.
Blutkreislauf.pngThis user is a member of
WikiProject Anatomy.
ECG Principle fast.gifThis user is a member of
WikiProject Physiology.
Eurasian otter.jpgThis user is a WikiOtter.
Symbol support vote.svgThis user has reviewed 60 Good Article nominations on Wikipedia.
PR icon.pngThis user has contributed to quite a few peer reviews on Wikipedia.


Bio barnstar2.png The Bio-star
For diligence above and beyond that expected of a typical article reviewer, exercised over months and with far more academic rigor than any other GA review I've worked with, in Talk:Myocardial infarction/GA1. Of course, the only reason it makes sense for me to demand so much and you to put up with it is that the improvements you've made to this article can and probably will save lives. (I wish there was a more appropriate Barnstar, but while we have them for tons of trivial topics, no one has made a Medicine Barnstar that I've found. This may be upgraded to that at will should one be developed in the future) Jclemens (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
A year ago ...
Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
masterpieces on anatomy
... you were recipient
no. 1376 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Bio barnstar2.png The Bio-star
Awarded to LT910001 (Tom LT), who successfully promoted Lung to GA status, a level-3 vital article. Good luck on your next article!
  User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  23:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

masterpieces on anatomy

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Thank you for your stellar work on anatomy articles on Wikipedia (I hope Heart soon adds a new feather to your cap!), for careful GA reviews, despite unwelcome circumstances. Indeed, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
About Wernicke. I appreciate your corrections. I hope it ends with the agreement of all us. Luis cerni (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
MedicineBarnstar.png The Medicine Barnstar
Great work cleaning up a number of medical articles. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 10:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Great work on merging / organizing Wikipedia's medical content. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Gaufre biscuit.jpg Globally awsome medicine-related content work. Good to have you on board. JFW | T@lk 23:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
MedicineBarnstar.png The Medicine Barnstar
To LT910001, for contributions to medical articles. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Team Barnstar Hires.png The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you for news! I love it very muchsmile Was a bee (talk) 11:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
For your excellent work on Anatomical terms of motion, and for finalizing the ridiculous amount of merges I had flagged and just thought later about.

CFCF (talk) 09:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

MedicineBarnstar.png The Medicine Barnstar
You were one of the top 10 medical contributors to Wikipedia in 2013. Many thanks for all your hard work. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
I haven't been on for long to edit a lot of the Anatomy pages, but I award you this Barnstar; you deserve it. Tux.png-Hamer(talk) 01:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Reviewer Barnstar Hires.png The Reviewer Barnstar
For your excellent example of collaboration and superb editing skills, I believe you deserve this barnstar. All the best, TylerDurden8823 (talk) 07:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
MedicineBarnstar.png The Medicine Barnstar
For your significant work improving Wikipedia's anatomy content. Hoping that these accolades will change your mind :-) Wikipedia only succeeds because of people like you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
I hearby award LT910001 this Star of Life for work on medical and anatomical articles. Good work! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


GA review barnstarsEdit

GA review barnstars
Reviewer Barnstar Hires.png The Reviewer Barnstar
for your detailed review of aphthous stomatitis. Lesion (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Reviewer's Barnstar.png The Reviewer's Barnstar
Thanks for your recent work to reduce the GA backlog--it's much appreciated! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Nuclear Barnstar Hires.png The Nuclear Barnstar
Thanks for your reviews of George T. Reynolds and Hugh Bradner. Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Resilient Barnstar Hires.png The Resilient Barnstar
For your persistence and hard work as a reviewer during the extended Good Article review of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 17:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
Many thanks for reviewing my GA nomination of Coat of arms of Pichilemu! Küñall (talk) 14:14, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Premium Reviewer Barnstar Hires.png The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
for your hard work, boldness and cooperative approach when reviewing Árpád, the first (or second? :) ) grand prince of the Hungarians. Borsoka (talk) 13:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar of Diligence.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for a very thorough and insightful review of Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey. If you keep doing GA reviews, your style and precision definitely will a tremendous benefit to the GA project and I encourage you to consider offering your keen eye and time to featured article candidates as well. ColonelHenry (talk) 00:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Halo halo1.jpg Halo-halo Award
For reviewing and assisting in upgrading Larry Itliong's article to GA status I present you this dessert. Enjoy! RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Premium Reviewer Barnstar Hires.png The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
LT910001, thank you so incredibly much for your thoughtful review of Wirgman Building and for assisting the article in passing its good article nomination! -- Caponer (talk) 02:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Premium Reviewer Barnstar Hires.png The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
LT910001, I hereby award you The Premium Reviewer Barnstar for your thoughtful and thorough review of Robert White (Virginia physician) and Wirgman Building! Thank you for all your extraordinary efforts in maintaining Wikipedia's quality and standards! -- Caponer (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

List of GA reviewsEdit

List of reviewed articles

Essay Important topics, long or complex reviews


Failed good article nominee Failed

Peer review barnstarsEdit

Peer review barnstars
Feedback Responder Barnstar.png The Feedback Responder Barnstar
Thank you for your feedback on the PA clan peer review. It's been a great introduction to the world of wikipedia editing T. Shafee (Evo&Evo) (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg Many thanks for the helpful feedback and advice on the peer review of Norwich School (independent school). Duffit5 (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


On technical writing:

They told me that if your reader can't understand your opening sentence, he's not going to read the rest of it, and if your reader doesn't read it, what's the point of writing?

I read Science and NEJM every week, and I couldn't figure it out the first time I read it.

This would be a good example for a writing course.

As I explained in the edit box, you can't define a word in terms of other words that your readers don't understand. If they don't know what "aneuploid" means, they're unlikely to know what "monoploid" means.

And providing a link for the unfamiliar word is no excuse. Every professional editor I know agrees that you can't do that. You have to include everything in the work itself that your reader needs for a basic understanding of your point. That's why I was glad to see that Wikipedia agreed in WP:NOTJOURNAL.

I hope I didn't drive [that user] off Wikipedia. Most people don't enjoy having their writing changed. I don't usually enjoy it myself. But an ordinary reader has to understand a Wikipedia article -- at least the introduction.

-- Nbauman 09:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC) [1]

Hurrah!! Emboldened by this I am off to make a change to the Epidermis article. It begins "The epidermis is a stratified squamous epithelium". Well that clears things up! LookingGlass (talk) 06:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)