Pending changes reviewer edit

Hi Prof, just in case you ever get involved in an article that has had to be given wp:Pending Changes protection, I've given your account reviewer rights so you can approve newbie and IP edits to such articles. ϢereSpielChequers 19:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Hypodysfibrinogenemia) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Hypodysfibrinogenemia, Joflaher!

A page you started (Familial eosinophilia) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Familial eosinophilia, Joflaher!

Your creations edit

Hello. I am very much impressed by your editing on wikipedia. If you dont mind, I have some tips for you. Would you be interested in them? (they are about creating new articles). Let me know here. Best, —usernamekiran(talk) 18:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted edit

 

Hi Joflaher, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 19:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eosinophilic myocarditis has been accepted edit

 
Eosinophilic myocarditis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

usernamekiran(talk) 17:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox help edit

Following your past note to me (joflaher), I created a new page, Eosinophilic myocarditis, on my sandbox, as you suggested, and submitted it two days ago. I then learned that its review may take over two months. However, I hope to make this page a foundation page for further pages that are closely related to it and that I wish to start creating now. I am an extended confirmed user, pending changes reviewer and autopatrolled. Perhaps I should of submitted this new page directly to you but I did not know how to do that. Would you speed up the review of Eosinophilic myocarditis or allow me to directly add this page? In all events, thank you for your past and, I hope, future help. (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I apologise for delayed reply. I will post a detailed message on your talkpage. :) —usernamekiran(talk) 17:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I apologise again for not contacting you regarding previous incident. I will do it soon.
I came here to ask help from you. The article Physiological functional capacity requires some "within field" links. Could you please do that? I have few things to tell you about the sandbox, it is already ready in my mind, but I am not getting around typing it to you. I will try to do that soon. Best, —usernamekiran(talk) 04:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions has been accepted edit

 
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Resolvin article edit

Hello. I made major deletions of your edits for the Resolvin article because you had inserted considerable amounts of primary research, speculation, and opinion editing about the importance and physiological or therapeutic roles of resolvins. This is WP:OR. Conclusions about the potential roles of resolvins should await the results of high-quality clinical research as defined in WP:MEDREV and other parts of the WP:MEDRS general guideline. You are likely acting in good faith by adding to the Resolvin article, but keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of best-known facts, i.e., information that relies on systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis of completed top-quality clinical trials. The resolvin literature is many years from this state of understanding. A conversation about your edits you may wish to join is occurring at the Wikiproject Medicine Talk page. Those editors and I are willing to help you orient better to medical editing and sourcing; this review may also be useful. --Zefr (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

 
Biochemistry&Love has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Thank you kindly for recognizing my recent edits to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis! It's nice to feel appreciated!―Biochemistry🙴 19:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

  The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

CYP2C9 edit

Thank you for your contributions to the CYP2C9 page that you did last year. The edits that I did since 22 June 2020‎ in the CYP2C9 page, mostly on CYP2C9#Pharmacogenomics and CYP2C9#CYP2C9 Ligands. -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

CYP4F2 edit

Could you please review my edits of the CYP4F2? Thank you in advance! ---Maxim Masiutin (talk) 18:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myofibroblastic tumors has been accepted edit

 
Myofibroblastic tumors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [utc] 05:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Joflaher. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 05:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma edit

Hi @Joflaher: I have copied your article for User:Anaplastic large cell lymphoma as it was the most modern version, into the article space article at Anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The revision history will taken across RoySmith but can you check the article is ok. If you need any help copying stuff about, please give me a shout. I see your sending your articles to draft which is a good thing, that will keep it right. scope_creepTalk 20:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Writer's Barnstar
I noticed your creation of the page Lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor, and wanted to thank you for the large number of medical pages you have created. Bibeyjj (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myxofibrosarcoma has been accepted edit

 
Myxofibrosarcoma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creepTalk 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous New Year edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!!

Hello Joflaher, warm wishes to you and your family throughout the holiday season. May your heart and home be filled with all of the joys the festive season brings. Here is a toast to a Merry Christmas and prosperous New Year!.

scope_creepTalk 00:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Possible images for Porocarcinoma edit

Good Morning @Joflaher:. There is a block of images on Wikipedia Commons at [1]] for Porocarcinoma. I can't comment on the quality of the images, they do have descritive text and they be useful for the article. To quote them in the article, you use the file template. This is an example.

 
Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz

The first parameter is the file name, the 2nd is the parameter tells the code to make a thumbnal image, the 3rd indicates is size in pixels and the 4th is the image caption, the descriptive text associated with the image. They be useful. I hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 10:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multiple sclerosis edit

My apologies for the misread at multiple sclerosis; I mistakenly thought you had added a whole new section. I reverted self! Long day, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Hi, sir! I'm glad to see that you liked my work. Thanks for the appreciations. My dream also to become a medical doctor. AwfulReader (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 4 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free fatty acid receptor 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Receptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Error corrected Joflaher (talk) 13:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 12 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free fatty acid receptor 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 16 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alcohol and Inguinal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 23 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Colon, Medulla and Ilium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 5 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free fatty acid receptor 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Differentiation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 28 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Itaconic acid, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lyse and Serum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Itaconic acid Chembox edit

Hi Joflaher,

In this edit, you lost most of the chemical infobox and placed the remnant far down in the article. That is a standard part of chemical articles, with full available info, and goes at the very beginning. Could you please restore it? DMacks (talk) 20:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done but please check it out to make sure the chembox has complete info Joflaher (talk) 21:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox edit

Please note that user sandbox pages, such as your User:Joflaher/sandbox, are not allowed to be filed in mainspace categories as if they were already finished articles. The page must stay out of categories while it's in sandbox, and categories are to be added only if and when the content is actually being moved into a real article. Since I've already had to remove the page from categories four times in the space of just one month, please also note that it is a thing you can be sanctioned for being disruptive if it continues, so please do not readd your sandbox page to categories again. Bearcat (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bearcat: will do. I may not fully understand your instructions so please, please be patient with me. I will conform. Joflaher (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I just had to remove the page from categories again, so just a reminder: do not add categories to the page while it's in sandbox. Bearcat (talk) 18:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Bearcat,
I don't think a change anything at all in the sandbox. Would please explain exactly what I did wrong in my sanbobox? Thank you for your patience. Joflaher (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply