Open main menu


Deletion of Draft:OrmucoEdit

Dear Materialscientist,

I hope my message finds you well.

Last Wednesday, May 15, you deleted a draft I wrote for the company "Ormuco". I am wondering if I may receive further feedback.

The grounds for deletion were G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I have reviewed G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion as well as Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion.

I attempted to write neutrally in describing Ormuco's history and product offerings. I included five independent references including from Bloomberg, Financial Post, and the UK Department for International Trade. Nonetheless, my article was deleted.

I would like to know how I could improve the article should I like to rewrite it, or if you would suggest I submit the article for review through the Articles for Creation process.

I noticed previous versions of the Ormuco page have been deleted in 2013 for G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion and 2014 for A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events). However, as time has elapsed since then, I have attempted to republish the Ormuco article, especially as Ormuco has patented its technology in 2016.

I believe mentions of Ormuco's 10+ year history, patent holdings, and media features pass through the notability test in User:Ihcoyc/The presumption of non-notability for Internet related, computing, and services businesses.

I would greatly appreciate hearing your thoughts. Thank you for your time.

Regards, LuoXizi (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @LuoXizi: WP:B2B (which you point to) is just an essay. WP:NCORP and WP:GNG are the law of the land. History, patent holdings, and the rest don't matter. We need multiple, independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage about the subject. As we've rejected this multiple times, I'd quit pressing the issue. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Blocked range

Hi Materialscientist,

Can you tell me which edits caused you to block (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? Someone who was blocked under that range is also using an account to edit, so I was wondering if the block was for those edits. Jayjg (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-Protection for some storm articlesEdit

Hello. Can you please Semi-Protect all of the listed articles? They have been popular targets for vandals recently. I refrained from requesting protection for some of those articles in order to honeypot vandals, but the sheer amount of vandalism that those articles (particularly Cyclone and Tropical cyclone) have experienced in the last few months is simply ridiculous. I'm also starting to grow tired of having to constantly police those articles. Can you please Semi-Protect them for a while to curb the disruption? Thanks. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 03:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Kenneth "Ken" GibsonEdit

Hi MS. Usual message - user unblocked, rename done, yada yada yada. You know the drill, ping me if needed! Cheers, Yunshui  09:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Promotion-only accountEdit

Administrator, reporting a user to your attention. This account Extra taste of knowledge is clearly WP:NOTHERE. Fanboy account of actor Mammootty, adding promotional edits and edit warring for the same. Meaninglessly using edit summaries copied from other users. Trolling at others talk pages. Adding fake references which do not cite the promotional content added in order to deceive others. Ignoring warnings and removing edit warring talk page warning. Clearly not here to contribute anything. (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Reemergence of account with unsourced editsEdit

Hello! You had few reverted some unsourced huge edits made by an account named Fan101ovo on pages such as Commissioner of Karachi and Pakistan Administrative Service in the months of February and March. You had gone on to block the account from editing if I recall correctly as those warnings went unheeded. However, it has come to my notice that once again similar unsourced edits are being made by an new account named Sindhimanoo. Please look into this. Thank you (Ereckkarja (talk))

EU seatsEdit

He reported just a false tweet to suuport new scenario in seat projections. (talk) 03:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

This is not vandalism, but edit warring. Stay calm. Materialscientist (talk) 03:50, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok). Not clear acting by him. (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Materialscientist".