Wikipedia

User talk:JVbot/patrol whitelist/Archive 1

< User talk:JVbot‎ | patrol whitelist
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Grutness in topic Me me me!

Original text

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
Copied from User talk:Jayvdb John Vandenberg (chat) 21:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there great idea having a bot automatically patrol the elite editors and contributors. I was wondering if you could extend the same courtest to User:EJF who is an active and able contributor. PLease see his contributions and then make a decision cheers ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 13:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Done - and, in fact, I had just noticed him myself and was about to add him to the list anyway! DS (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
To clarify: there is no "elite" here. This is for people who reliably produce large quantities of valid articles. DS (talk) 00:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I was checking a few of my articles over the last week or two, and they were all marked by JVBot - I thought I had a stalker! Lugnuts (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Suggested members?

These are suggested based on the number of non-deleted new pages.. Perhaps all their new pages are penis spam? Someone should find out. ;)

User:Dex1337

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you someone add this user to the list? He (or she) has been creating dozens of station articles, which are all valid. I'm tired of patrolling him. -- Taku (talk) 10:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

 Y Done John Vandenberg (chat) 15:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

User:RushdimIDlike

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello again. The user has been creating station articles en masse. I don't think his articles need to be patrolled by a human. -- Taku (talk) 01:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I don't think User:RushdimIDlike's articles should be auto patrolled. He is a relatively new user, and the articles needs another editors eyes. They are uncategorized and needs wikifying. He has repeatedly added his signature to new articles, and has created nonsense articles. Rettetast (talk) 16:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
All, right, if that's the case. -- Taku (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Dickeybird

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can this user be added? He creates a lot of articles related to French geography, and translated from the French Wikipedia. Mjroots (talk) 17:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

  Done. Rettetast (talk) 08:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Tinucherian

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This editor has been creating lots of articles on places in India. A possible candidate for the whitelist? Mjroots (talk) 11:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

  Done. Rettetast (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Rudolph89

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

With a total of 102 articles to date, Rudolph is a highly active new page creator. Perhaps he should be tagged? - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 01:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  Done. Rettetast (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Plumoyr

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Even though he is a newbie, he has created a bunch of useful articles ([1]) and probably could be added without incident. - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 17:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

  Done. Rettetast (talk) 14:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Invertzoo

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

157 new articles.

What's the minimum that is generally our guideline anyway? - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 17:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Already on the whitelist. There is no magic number. Users who have shown that they can be trusted in createing new articles can be added. Rettetast (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Bobo192

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bobo192 (talk · contribs)

Seems to be trusted. SQl's article creation tool can't even parse him due to his number of edits. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 16:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Bobo192 is an admin and all his creations are automatically patrolled by the software. Rettetast (talk) 22:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Apparently they weren't, I found a couple of them while patrolling the backlog today.

User:Kisuga

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Kisuga (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi) NuclearWarfare (Talk) 04:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

  Done. Rettetast (talk) 11:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Few suggestions

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some possible additions. – Sadalmelik ☎ 09:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

  •   Done.
  •   Done.
  •   Done.

User:Bugboy52.40

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Has created many articles, and just created a spree of fruit fly-genus-related stubs, which is laborious to patrol manually. Jamie☆S93 02:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

What is this?

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Autoreviewer? Why am I an "autoreviewer"? What does this mean? Please respond on my talk at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your time. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see WP:Autoreviewer for more; but basically, this means that your new articles will not have to be reviewed at Special:NewPages; instead, the Mediawiki software will automatically mark them as patrolled. Leaving a note for you on your talk page as well. NW (Talk) 20:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Genius Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Me me me!

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

At the risk of blowing my own trumpet, I'm an admin (and therefore probably fairly reliable) and have created - at last count - 1,983 articles, over 300 templates, and about 150 categories, which is probably enough to be an autoreviewer. Any chance, hint hint...? Grutness...wha? 00:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

PS-the concept of autoreviewing is an excellent idea, BTW - well done. Grutness...wha?
I suspect your request will be denied.  Skomorokh  15:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Administrators automatically have the autopatrol right, which would render the addition of autoreviewer redundant. But 2,000 articles? Wow. Great job, and keep up the good work! NW (Talk) 16:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Ah - OK, that makes sense. And yeah 2000, but a lot of them were pretty stubby (all legit, though). Thanks for the comments :) Grutness...wha? 01:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Copy notice

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

{{editprotected}} Could an administrator please copy/paste the {{notice}} at the top of this talk page to the top of User:JVbot/patrol whitelist? Thanks, NW (Talk) 16:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

  Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JVbot/patrol_whitelist/Archive_1&oldid=1141486529"