Universal Hero

Marmayogi

Hey dude i don't think sushmitha sen is doing any role in marmayogi. Moreover the film dropped because of the film's high budget and kamal schedule is full so they had dropped the film. I think hema malini is doing the villain role(not sushmitha sen). If u still wanna do it, its ok but there is one more {Trisha's role previously given to Shriya but shriya refuse it because she was busy with her other film at that time } so tha kamal offers shriya to play as his flashback wife in the film.

JustTollywood

Hi,

I noticed that you are removing all the justtollywood links. I have read all the guidelines for external links and articles. I am not violating any guidelines, so, I think you should stop removing my links. If you know any other rules which I am unaware of please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srchalla (talk • contribs) 15:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Article R.Madhavan

Hey dude, in article Madhavan I don't understand why you have removed his name in Tamil in the first brief intro. Please do not revert. --BennyWikipedian (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Help needed from someone trustable

Hey dude! I need a help from you! Will you help me to create a page called User:Thulasi12345/Vettaikaaran! Please , and if you create the page filled it up with ..(see down)..

Hey, Thulasi! This is the page you asked to create !

After you create, message me on my talk page.

—Thulasi12345 (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 16:10, 02 January 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Vijay

Hey I need your help. Are you an admin? Is it possible for you to temporarily block the Vijay article from unauthorized users to edit it. It's been subject to too much vandalism and so much people are adding made up info to the page, like Vijay's 50th and 51st movies which are just rumours. I always find vandalism on the page everyday. Can you block the article from being edited by these people just until Vettaikkaaran starts or something -- its turning out to be a pain undoing all the vandalism. Thanks. --இளைய நாயகன் Eelam StyleZ (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Enga Veetu Pillai

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Enga Veetu Pillai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unremarkable unreleased movie.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -Zeus- [t|c] 19:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Asal

I have deleted this article following a consensus at the deletion discussion. The consensus also indicated the possibility of userfication until the commencement of shooting has been announced. What I would do it move the deleted content to a subpage in your userspace, and you could move it back when you have been able to cite this missing detail. If you would like me to do this for you, please let me know on my talkpage. Best wishes, Fritzpoll (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Kanthaswamy

Hi Universal Hero, I think, the article is definitely Tamil centric, although I know well, that the makers are of course Tamils. I need the requested source please. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Asal

 Done at User:Universal Hero/Asal Fritzpoll (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Stardust The New Menace Award

{{mergeto}}

This is regarding Aegan plot

Hi,

The Aegan plot you have mentioned is completely irrelevant and follows the Hindi film ' Main Hoon na' story. Aegan which is supposedly a remake of the original Hindi fare underwent drastic changes in the script. I have watched the movie many times and know the story by heart. So I changed the story. But you have edited it back to the old content. On what basis did you change the story? I am new to Wikipedia so I dont know the rules around here. So please let me know why it was changed back.

Ravi41778 (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Universal Hero. You have new messages at Pharaoh of the Wizards's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dude I have been waiting for like 2 days now. You have provided a seriously wrong information in wikipedia.

Ravi41778 (talk) 13:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Dude, Aegan's plot you have mentioned is completely wrong. Why dont you accept it. Please change it. I had previously given the original plot but it seems you are not interested in the change, even if it is for the good.

Standardisation of terms

Hi, I'm tagging here because I've seen you editing many Tamil film articles and would like your opinion. Please check out the discussion I've started here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Tamil-language_films#Standardisation_of_terms_used Ckannan90 (talk) 07:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Aeganaudiofront.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aeganaudiofront.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Mgr article

Hello, I'm Thulasi12345 messaging here. May I know why you changed a big whole part of Mgr article ? And redirecting it to Pandhayam article. Mgr film is of real, which just havne't done it's offical announcement. Not the fictional Mgr film, featured in Pandhayam film.

---

It is about a true film. Not the fictionous film in Pandhayam. Ok! The directors nominated was a long list, so we're not so sure about the director. Please don't redirect Mgr article to Padhayam again. Please. You knew wikipedia rules right. If you did it again, I've have to take action on you.

Thank you

Thank you so much... I really appreciate it! :) --Eelam StyleZ ^(talk) 22:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey

I missed you really. We are kinda not on talking terms or what?? LOL!!! How have you been? How's life? You sent me a message I also could not move the page you asked to. I was also blocked right after seeing your message :(

Talk2me. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Images In Joseph Vijay's 51st film

May I know the reason why you had changed the Joseph Vijay's 51st film article's image and talk. You can't do that without reason. I have the rights for it, because it is in my user page. I think you should read more about Wikipedia rules. Please read it. It's better for you.

--- Thulasidasan 02:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thulasi12345

 Clerk note:

When submitting sockpuppetry cases, it is more likely that the case will be rapidly processed if you follow the following guidelines;

1. Submit your evidence in the correct section
2. Submit evidence, rather than your recommendations. The reviewing admin will decide on what needs to be done.
3. Submit evidence of sockpuppetry, rather than of general poor behaviour.

Mayalld (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Prashanthfilm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Prashanthfilm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Your beautiful layout

Hello, Universal Hero. I've liked your layout on your user page. I've borrowed your layout to put on my user page. Thank you.

Dark Knight Rider (talk) 13:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sahana (song)

I have nominated Sahana (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahana (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sahara (song)

I have nominated Sahara (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahara (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Oh Ho Sanam

I have nominated Oh Ho Sanam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh Ho Sanam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeans budget

Do you actually believe Jeans' budget exceeds $4m? Then, the film is a flop. Bcoz its total gross was $4m - a new peak for Prashanth. Newspapers then reported that Jeans was less than Indian.Anwar (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Dasavatharam - gross

Why are you removing citations for Dasavatharam's gross of $16 million?[1] boxofficemojo.com gives dollar figures not rupee figures. Anwar (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Payya image copyvio?

Hi Prin

Where did you get this photo? You have not mentioned the source of the image? Did you download it from the Internet? I have tagged the file as per CAT:NS

Anwar (talk) 12:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

notify possible copyright violation

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kodi1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Anwar

Hi universal. The guy is clearly going out of his way to make things awkward. It is a clear case of victimization. I would recommend reporting him to WP:ANI. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Just provide as many examples as you can find like the one where he added lots of peacock words to demonstrate how he is being disruptive to existing articles and also how he is going out of his way to disrupt your editing (including spamming you with image licenses). Memtioning his huge history of blocking wouldn't hurt either. Regards Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

All you have to do is find the url link of where you got the images from to those images. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Universal Hero. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Universal Hero.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Additional information needed Please could you clarify the edit that I have queried. Mayalld (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Kamal Haasan's - $100 million box office total

Why do you keep removing the line that Kamal's lifetime box office collections exceed $100 million? I know you are a Rajini fan. But Rajini was important after 1990 only.Let me give the box office collections of his ten films and see if you can count:

• Dasavatharam - $18 million (All-Time Blockbuster)
• Vettaiyadu Vilaiyadu - $11 million
• Vasoolraja MBBS - $8 million
• Thenali - $7 million
• Indian - $6 million
• Apoorva Sagodharargal - $5 million (All-Time Blockbuster)
• Nayakan - $4 million
• Thoongadhey Thambi Thoongadhey - $3 million (All-Time Blockbuster)
• Vaazhvey Maayam - $2 million
• 16 Vayadhinile - $1 million

These ten films together gross $65 million. He acted in over 200 films in Tamil, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Hindi... The figure I quoted is a understatement of his achievements. Please stop blind revert warring. These one-liners are irreftable facts of the man's achievements.Anwar (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Exclusive licence?

Hi Prin

Here you claim to hold exclusive licence for redistribution of images from the websites behindwoods.com and kollywoodtoday.com for your uploads. Is it true? Can I see the licence agreement? Can you give me the details of your contacts at these portals so that I can verify. Anwar (talk) 11:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, sure, I'll upload it when I have the time. Why do you want to see it anyway? Universal Hero (talk) 11:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey hey..

I fully believe you are not what some perceive you to be, and the checkuser will prove it. I think no useless discussions are needed. It's better if a checkuser is made and you get out of this silly story. I also cannot understand how such things are relevant after a two-year gap. It makes me laugh. You're one of the better editors I know, and I trust your fairness and goodwill (and that's what I'm going to say to anyone who has the intention to harm you and your wiki-reputation).

I'm ready to support you. Right now I can't see where my opinion values, because I did not have the time to do anything but glance for two bits, and I understand nothing. You caught me at a time I'm not less active (more than three days ago, I was very active), so did not have the time to examine the situation, as well as when, how and why it started. While here, I've always fought for the fareness and the general sake of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. I never cared if I had to pay for that, and eventually people on here appreciated that. I advice you to do the same. Don't get disheartened. Don't hesitate to make me a post whenever you need to. Your friend, Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to see you working on some GAs. You do it wonderfully. Both Blof, Rahul and myself think very high of your work on South Indian articles (just like Mspraveen, another great guy). Please don't disappear now. I like editing, and I think this place is a great experience to learning. I did leave Wikipedia because I was forced to, but came back within two months. Now I don't know what exactly will be. I've learned not to take this place seriously, bewcause people outside don't do that either (LOL!!!)... Do the same!!! Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard.

I have asked for an investigation of some of your image uploads here. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Repeated_Copyright_fraud GameKeeper (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

I sort of need some help here. A user by the name of "User:Brajbilla2007" has been constantly uploading awkward images of Ajith Kumar to the Ajith Kumar and Asal pages after several warnings I gave him and keeps trying to add a new Billa 2 link to every possible article (such as Vishnuvardhan and Billa (2007 film)). I can't seem to make him stop messing up the Asal article either. Can you look into that please? Thanks. --Eelam StyleZ ^(talk) 04:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Kantha.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kantha.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Do not tamper with tags and notices

You have claimed to have downloaded this image straight from a website. Incase you are unaware, it is illegal. Did the producer of the film give you written permission to do so? Anwar (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Replacing the tag is not a good idea.Anwar (talk) 19:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Is Chennai365.com the producer of Poda Podi?Anwar (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey Universal Hero just wanted to inform you that you do not need permission from the copyright holder as Anwar is claiming if you are uploading a fair use. It seems like you know what is required for a fair use image but just in case you had any doubts all a fair use image needs is a fair use rationale and a license tag, eg: File:Flushed poster.jpg. However also keep in mind this only applies to items that fall under fair use such as posters, logos, cover art, etc. Keep up the good work. Salavat (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Podapodi112.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Podapodi112.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Naga Chaitanya

I have nominated Naga Chaitanya, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naga Chaitanya. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tabercil (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Poorkkalam

I really don't know how to explain you the difference between Poorkkalam and Porkaalam, nonethess I'm trying:

Look at the Tamil writing:

போர்க்களம் - The 2009 Tamil film directed by Bandi Saroj Kumar starring Kishore & Tinnu Anand. Meaning: Battlefield

and

பொற்காலம் - The 1997 Tamil film directed by Cheran starring Murali & Meena. Meaning: Golden Time /Age

Where the hell you see the similarities between these two Tamil words. Apart from the last letter (ம்), not a single letter is the same in both the words. The main difference is the "rka", try to see the difference between "ற்கா" (in பொற்காலம்) and "ர்க்க" (போர்க்களம்). No similarities, but you have titled both the films with the same title, not possible.

THE correct anglicized spelling of "போர்க்களம்" HAS TO BE "Poorkkalam" (or "Porkkalam" as you can't make a difference between "பொ" and "போ" in English writing), but in no case "Porkkaalam"!

And yeah, it may vary always slightly (by the way, I've never seen, someone writing "Egan"!), but this, you have to understand, is actually a "major" problem, since the meanings of the words are completely different and writing "Porkkaalam" instead of "Porkkalam" will falsify the meaning of the title.

And how does it happen, that you can't distinguish the difference between these two words, since everyone, who can speak, write and understand Tamil, will notice, that both the words can't be written in the same way, neither in English nor in another language!!!

Moreover, look at the OFFICIAL WEBSITE of that film or how other websites how written the film's title. You seem to be the only, single person in the world to spell that word in that way!

So you have to make a difference between both the words, make "Porkkalam" (or "Poorkkalam") out of "Porkkaalam" or I'll do it, in two days, at the latest!

Thanks, brother, take things easy and do try to understand, what I'm trying to tell you. I never thought, this would become such major issue! Anyhow, best wishes! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes003 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Chennaiyil Oru Mazhaikaalam

Sorry, but I didn't delete it, someone else did. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Sura (film)

Main article: Sura (film)

Are you going/continuing to write Sura article? Because, I'm thinking to write the Sura article on Wikipedia ?

World Cinema Writer (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kabir Toor

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kabir Toor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CRIN and WP:ATHLETE, cricketer who is yet to play professional cricket, can be recreated when he does

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jpeeling (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Deletion

Some context for your comment would be excellent, then I might actually know what you're on about. PC78 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

It's not my job to inform you -- if you care about the article you should have it on your watch list. The article quite clearly fails the applicable notability guidelines, so I would be very interested to read your "keep" rationale. PC78 (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Aaskar Films a different title by copying its content and pasting it into Aascar Films. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Aegan

Thanks for restoring the proper page--I couldn't see the forest for the trees anymore. Drmies (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Singam

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Singam. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singam. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Paravai Muniyamma

When you are creating a new article which is not yet complete, consider adding the {{underconstruction}} tag to the top when submitting it for the first time. This lets other editors know that you are actively working on it and plan to improve it with more information and references very soon. Without this tag it's difficult for other editors to distinguish articles which are being actively worked on from those that are incomplete and are likely to stay incomplete.--RadioFan (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

every film deserves to have an article

Every film does not deserve an article, only those which meet Wikipedia:Notability (films) do. In any film articles you create, make sure that it's clear that the film has been widely distributed and/or include any major awards the film has won. Be sure to provide references for these facts or the article is likely to be nominated for deletion.--RadioFan (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Assume good faith / no personal attacks

Regarding your comment here, please follow Wikipedia policy of assuming good faith. And if you cant assume good faith, you must not attack a fellow editor by making accusations of sockpuppetry across the site. If you feel the editor is an abusive sock puppet, make the appropriate request here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations and await the results. -- The Red Pen of Doom 05:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, guys. I'me sorry for what I've done. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kabir Toor

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kabir Toor. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabir Toor. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thirumangalam (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thirumangalam (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreleased film lacking significant coverage in reliable source_s_

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Dasavathaaram

Wow, I'm really suprised seeing your article, Dasavathaaram didn't get WP:GA. I'm really taking deep interest on the article. I'll try to make edit and let's bring it up to WP:GA again. Regards, World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Furthermore, the title Dasavatharam, not Dasavathaaram. The ImdB reports the same too. Any testdirve, you can do here. Thank you. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I've finished my work and has nominated it to DYK and GA - Talk: Dasavathaaram/GA2. Hope it gets GA. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 03:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Fine

Fine, if you really doesn't need my help, nevermine. Anyway, the article was better in my edit. Are you still in fight with me. Because, I forget that long time ago. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 11:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, if you see, that was th article i went so much active. And you reverted it. Just, make me felt sad. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 11:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TanishaVinay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TanishaVinay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic POV commentary

Please do not make edits like this one where you inserted much unsourced , POV, superlative laden , commentary. Content in Wikipedia articles must be sourced and presented in a manner appropriate for an encyclopedia, not a fan homage or celebrity gossip mag. -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hey buddy! It has been a long time since I last talked to you. I am doing fine. How are you?? I managed to catch KI today, which, apparently was released two days earlier here in Toronto. The film is quite entertaining and I enjoyed it quite a lot. I haven't seen Pammal K. Sambandam so I am not sure if KI is indeed a remake of the film. Unfortunately, I haven't seen 13B though I will definitely try to get my hands on the DVD. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Please be more careful when writing about living people

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kamal Haasan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Re your response on my page: you may not be a new editor, but even long term editors who continue to add unsourced and poorly sourced gossip to articles about living people will be blocked.-- The Red Pen of Doom 23:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Vaana(Tamil film)

Hello Universal Hero, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Vaana(Tamil film) - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 23:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

"Urimai Kural"

Thank you, Universal Hero. If can, I'm planning to bring the article to WP:GA, if can as a competitor to Lage Raho Munna Bhai. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 07:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

"Urimai Kural"—IPA Help

As on the title, you knew that I writing an article entitled, Urimai Kural. I was in an intention to bring up the article to WP:FA. As if, I took Lage Raho Munna Bhai as my idol, not fully. I see that the article has a WP:IPA. So, I planned to put up a WP:IPA on my article. But, I don't know whether the IPA I wrote was correct or not. So, what I want you to help me about is to check the IPA. Cheers, World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 02:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Come one, I knew that fact. What about the IPA? World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Of course on WP:GA first. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Look at WP:GA now? The article is still in sub-page. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Of course now. But, if you find a problem, don't move it. Tell me first. We'll discuss.World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 12:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Priya Anand page edits

The names of Priya Anand's roles have been confirmed by reliable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arivoli.r (talk • contribs) 22:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Yatra (Tamil Film)

Hello Universal Hero, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Yatra (Tamil Film) - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 09:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dashaavataram-Gallery-2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dashaavataram-Gallery-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dasavatharam-Stills-30.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dasavatharam-Stills-30.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Yuvan Shankar Raja-Parattai connection

Regarding "Parattai Engira Azhagu Sundaram" music, the entire soundtrack, comprising of six songs, was defintely retained from the original Kannada version, composed by Gurukiran! As far as I know Yuvan Shankar was a part of the earlier crew, when Raju Sundaram was supposed to direct the film, so I guess, his name is still mentioned there, even after the director got changed. It is also possible, that Yuvan Shankar had scored only the background score, though I'm sure about this either.

However, this has to be clarified at first, until then I will hide your comment! Thanks, anyway!

Johannes003 (talk) 09:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right, but I think, it was Simbu's opening song ("Thotta Powerda") that was composed by Yuvan! Johannes003 (talk) 10:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

hi !

hi buddy ! saw ur effort's ....welldone....nice work....i wish to work on Mullaperiyar Dam ....if possible it would be great to see u there ...regards--Doctor muthu's muthu ^{wanna talk ?} 13:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Asin Thottumkal

Please read and understand our policies about neutral point of view, original research, puffery. Do not return these unencyclopedic content to the article. -- The Red Pen of Doom 01:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey buddy!!! I'm happy to hear from you and I'm happy you're working on the south Filmfare Awards which have been in need of editing a long time ago. Sadly, there' not enough info about them, and there are so many languages that it's quite confusing. You created a wonderful page. Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

First, I hope you were not upset with what was happening on the Asin page. I had several discussions with TheRedPenofDoom as you can see on my and his talk pages.

New films. The only new film I saw was New York, which was good. BTW, it's quite amazing but several days back I saw a film with Kamal Haasan and Hema Malini - forgot the name. It is an amazing Hindi art film. Raaj Kumar plays his father and Padmini Kolhapure her daughter. And the elders fall for the youngsters. Kamal - well, as always great. He played an angry young man... LOL! Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

How can you compare Rajni to Haasan? I honestly was never impressed much by Rajnikanth. Kamal is a THREE-time National Award winning actor and he's had a great share of hits as well. He's an accomplished actor while Rajni is a star for no evident reason. It's my opinion of couse - I don't want anyone to get offended. I'm happy you appreciate art films. Have you seen Deepa Mehta's Heaven on Earth (film)? Preity was really really amazing!! She was nominated for several international awards and won an award at the international film festival of Chicago!

Looking forward to all these three films. And Kaminey, which releases tomorrow. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

You said it very well: He is the master! He's made such amazing films - it's unbelievable. He's one of the few filmmakers who are able to combine total relality with art and making exceptionally artistic films without having to take anything from their realism. Dil Se is surprisingly enough one of my favourite Preity performances - although it's such a brief role. Mani sir has always extracted good performances from his actors - every actor has given one of his best in his films. Shahid • ^Talk2me 11:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Naga Chaitanya deletion

I've deleted the article you created for Naga Chaitanya. Back in April of this year an earlier article on Naga was deleted after discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naga Chaitanya, and I do not see any new information which would cause the article to overcome the earlier arguments for deletion. Tabercil (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay... I've done some checking and I've undeleted the article. I'm not convinced he is notable, but I'll hold off on acting to allow others to start work on the article. Tabercil (talk) 01:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Pokkisham

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pokkisham, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://kollywoodtopics.blogspot.com/2009/08/movie-review-pokkisham.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Pokkisham and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Pokkisham with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Pokkisham. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Pokkisham saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Crowrlg (talk) 22:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Azhagar Malai

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Azhagar Malai, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://sify.com/movies/tamil/review.php?cid=2429, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Azhagar Malai and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Azhagar Malai with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Azhagar Malai. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Azhagar Malai saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Crowrlg (talk) 22:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Bold text

Please do not unnecessarily make text bold. This also applies to cast lists. Please check out the system we use for the rest of the film articles and try and keep your additions as closely linked to the system as possible. Thanks --Maurice45 (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?!

That's all very well, but my edit wasn't vandalism, and I don't see how calling it "cheeky vandalism" helps prove anything. Please be more constructive and not criticise another's edits in such a way, simply calling it "vandalism" if you don't agree with it --Maurice45 (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Shriya Saran.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Shriya Saran.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/8286281@N08/2311107795/. As a copyright violation, File:Shriya Saran.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Shriya Saran.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Shriya Saran.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Shriya Saran.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Shriya Saran.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Uploded to Flickr in a larger size and befor you transfered it to Commons. Also you should archive this note instead of deleting this and you should take this as a warning to NOT repeat this false claims "This photo was taken by me in India" - which is a bloddy lie! I dont know what makes you lying in the anonymity of the internet, I just want to say you that this is a really bad behaviour. --Martin H. (talk) 13:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files by User:Universal Hero is related to your uploads. Regards, --Martin H. (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Rechipo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rechipo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.greatandhra.com/ganews/viewnews.php?id=16302&cat=&scat=12. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Sri Lankan Tamil cinema

Hi dude! whenever you get time. Can you please check the article Sri Lankan Tamil cinema and improve the quality of this article. Thank you .--BlueLankan 14:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear hero pls dont modify/redirect unnikrishnan page to P. Unnikrishnan. you may be his fan. dont spoil me. it is a request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.241.57.103 (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey!

Hey Universal Hero,

just wanted to say thank you! Thank you for cleaning up those sites and thank you for helping me! These articles are full of fake and biased information and so cleaning up and putting references in order to prevent (or at least try to prevent) vandalism, was mandatory. It was actually actress Simran's page that made me to do so. (I'm sure, it's still not "clean"!) So, thank you for your help and support and keep on your good work! Johannes003 (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Kanchivaram

Hello, Universal Hero. You have new messages at Reincarnut's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello (1999 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hello (1999 film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thenisai.com/tamil/movies-cinema/hello-tamil-movies.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

hey i found a lot of false facts in the page A.R.Rahman.Can u please debug that article please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperroy (talk • contribs) 13:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Magadheera-wallpapers9 (1).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Magadheera-wallpapers9 (1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ajith party.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ajith party.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Amalthea 00:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi,
I can't see that page you just added, http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1940531&id=607246116. Main question is, does the owner of that picture explicitly release it into the public domain there?
Amalthea 00:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The page, goes to her official facebook page - where according to the new guidelines all material is accessible to the public. Furthermore, she has given me verbal authorisation, if you wish, I'll kindly ask her to produce some sort of note or so. :) Universal Hero (talk) 00:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

"Accessible to the public" is very different to releasing an image into the public domain, which is what you put on the file page! If she owns that image and wants to release it into the public domain or under a free license, she would need to follow the procedure laid out in Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. As it stands, it will have to be deleted (and believe me, I'd very much like having a clearly policy compliant picture for that actor so that I could stop deleting the copyright infringing ones!).
Amalthea 00:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I'll kindly ask her to reproduce what she had told me into an email to the email address. Universal Hero (talk) 11:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I've marked the file as such. Please tell her to name the file name in question in her e-mail, "File:Ajith party.jpg", so that the person who processes it will know where to look. Thanks, Amalthea 11:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar

Hello again,
can you explain to me why you think that the unsourced statement "Aalwar which bombed at the box office miserably" is in any way an appropriate phrase for an encyclopedia that strives to write neutral, verifiable articles?
Amalthea 22:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

About the image, she has accepted - waiting for an email anytime soon. I was doing a mass reversion due to persistent vandalism. I'm slowly working through the article, as you may have seen through the expansion of the initial sections of the page. Ajith Kumar, is the second "largest" actor in South India and is open to vandals all the time. Pleas ebare with me, for the moment. Universal Hero (talk) 22:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

No, I've not seen that, and I do not see that. Are you saying that all seven editors that made changes to the article since your last change are vandals? Are you saying that the sentence you added back and I just quoted is to be seen as an improvement?
From your edit I can't deduce what you are thinking or trying to do. All I see is that you reverted to your last version, and since you persistently refuse to use edit summaries to give your edits context, I have to come here now and get your explanation, before I change the article myself and remove the unsourced, highly contentious content that you just added back. Amalthea 22:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Yuvan for Striker!

Hey, how do you know that Yuvan is confirmed for Striker? You indeed referring to the Hindi movie starring Siddharth? Johannes003 (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, is it? Will check it out, thanks dude! Johannes003 (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Three Idiots

Was there a need to change the cast in tabular format to simple format in Three Idiots. Table was looking much better than this current format. If you have no objection I will revert it back to the tabular format. Managerarc (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

I dont agree with you that the table format has died. I think table format is in use for most of the old and new film articles. Besides, it is written in bold which doesnt look good to the eyes. Managerarc (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

I feel we need to put this thing up for discussion to get the views of other people as well because there is no specific rule which defines how the cast should be mentioned.Managerarc (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Endhiran.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Endhiran.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Goa

Yes, I think, this is acceptable. First of all, Goa soundtrack is, along with VTV, one of the most anticipated and most expected albums. I didn't intend to start a separate article, but Goa's article itself was getting longer and longer and so decided to open a new page. If I merge the soundtrack page into the main article, it would get way too long, I feel. Goa's soundtrack page is already over 9000 bytes long!!

I don't want such a trend either and as I said, I never really planned for a separate page, but seriously I don't think Goa is an unnotable album, in my opinion there is also novelty in Goa's album. I agree that not every single film should have a separate soundtrack page, but for me Goa would be worth an exception. I will take care that not everybody opens such a page for unnotable albums. Johannes003 (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Universal Hero! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 13 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Shiva (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Snigdha Akolkar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Jai (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Brinda Parekh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Srinath (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Aravind Akash - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Nithin Sathya - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Yogi Srinivasan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Madhu Muttam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. P. Vijay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Rags (singer) 12. A. R. Reihana

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Reply

Hey friend. No it's not a flaw. A few years ago there was a delay in the awards which created a mess. Awards for 2007 were given a few months ago in 2009. And the awards for 2008 were given only now so that later this year they can give awards to 2009 films. What we should do I think is to ignore that all and follow the simple standard of writing the following year to the film's release. I mean, a 1999 film will be included in the line of the 2000 awards. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Support

Hey Hero :)

I really need your help and support now. An ardent Ajith fanatic is editing the Aasal article and making it a fansite. He is getting irritating slowly. Now since you are an experienced and clever editor, I would like to request you to support me in this fight against such editor. He thinks, he is correct and I have no idea about editing at wikipedia, so if at least one more editor would support me and show the poor guy "the right way", it would be really great. Thanks in advance! Johannes003 (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Reg removal of my Aayirathil Oruvan edit

Can you tell me why have you removed my edit on Aayirathil Oruvan article pls? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aayirathil_Oruvan&action=history Clapsandboos is a movie discussion board launched early this year and publishes reviews of their hired professional critics and provides their weighted score under the "loudmouth" section. All the other registered user reviews are published after moderation and a "popular score" is provided. The website is monitored by hired moderators and only valid reviews are published. All the loudmouth reviewers are hired professional writers. Hence, I think it is perfectly valid to add an entry for that in the movie article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvindrockz (talk • contribs) 17:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

//I don't know what your playing at. That garbage called "ClapsandBoos" is practically a forum full of opionated film fans. It is 100 percent NOT reliable, don't expect another reason returning an argument, as any attempt by yourslef to stick up for such a lowly cause would be invalid. I saw this too, ClapsandBoos, and will be voting for its deletion. Universal Hero (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

What do you know about the website to call it garbage? As I said before, the website doesn't allow "biased" and nonsensical reviews. All the reviews are published only after moderation. To add to this, there are profession reviews as well. You can go ahead and vote for deleting the main page for the website, as I have myself acknowledged it. But, there is no basis for deleting this review edit? It just works similar to how "Rotton Tomatoes" website works —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvindrockz (talk • contribs) 17:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, that may be your opinion. I don't understand how you call that a "fan forum". You argument holds no water. I don't know what gave you that idea neither do I understand what is that exactly that you are trying to do here. I am going to add that back, if you have issues bring it up on the discussion page for the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvindrockz (talk • contribs) 18:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand know what your agenda is. You have acccused the website as 'garbage' 'orkut based' and all that without the faintest of idea. What is your intention against a democratic website which is well moderated? And why don't you put up this for discussion in the movie page, then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvindrockz (talk • contribs) 18:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

It is high time you place a check on what you say. How do you accuse him of being my "sockpuppet" when you don't have any clue about us? Most of your accusations were invalid and you didn't accept it when I responded to you. Then when I passed on the message to the person who writes for the site and have him clear things for you, you accuse him of being my "sockpuppte". How comfortable, eh? That you prefer to talk randomly without addressing the concerned issue. And, I can't speak for him or his edits. I am trying my best to constructive edits and am here for that only. When we showed you how "notable" the website writers are, what is the problem? Movie Buff (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Well well well, is this all you can comprehend? He wrote in your page that "I am Udhav Naig" and explained things to you. On a different discussion, I posted the same justification in User talk:BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ's page. Please go and check for yourself if I had claimed there that I was Udhav. Again, you are just resorting to cheap accusations and your claims of "sockpuppet" is totally baseless and holds no water. If you want to start an investigation for that, you can go ahead.

Now, why don't you actually address the discussion that is supposed to happen here? You have been provided enough references to how notable the website's critics are. Then, what exactly is the issue? Movie Buff (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

It looks like we are talking in circles. If your concern is the website reviews being written by "non notable" people, then doesn't references to the notable works of the reviewer hired that I provided help the cause? Or if the concern is that people will be able to "read the review" of that particular critic, then I guess I can link the exact review of that critic, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvindrockz (talk • contribs) 20:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hi

Hello, Universal Hero. You have new messages at Erik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Box office

Regarding that 'List of Top Tamil films' on the Tamil films of 2010 page, did you thought of adding only the figures of the openings of the films or to update the figures weekly? And the Behindwoods link doesn't expire after a week, so it could be added as a source! Johannes003 (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah right, then let's leave the opening grosses. Your link indeed redirects to some other page, but check out this one: Top Ten Movies I think, this should work! Johannes003 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Asin's bday confusion

pls see Talk page for article Asin .Thanks. Arjun⁰²⁴ 16:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey that information isn't obvious... Some things which are obvious to you will not be obvious to everyone. And why do you think it needn't be included in the opening? It needs to made clear what rights of the film have been sold worldwide. And so please don't remove it from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editinfo (talk • contribs) 06:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Shriya Saran

Why are you always change shriya's wikipedia? I have already expand it but you always delete it are you stupid!! Can't you read the massege displaced by wiki that we need to expand shriya's wikipedia if not it will be deleted. this is last warning please do not do that she is my favourite actress ok!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravinraj (talk • contribs) 19:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Filmography of Simbudevan

Template:Filmography of Simbudevan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:ITFA Awards

I have nominated Category:ITFA Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:International Tamil Film Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

GANs

Hey, I'm Hunter. I've been considering reviewing your GANs, and the subject matter really fascinates me. However, each of these GANs seem to be cited entirely by websites, and I'm not sure whether they meet Wikipedia's reliable source standards. That being said, however, I'm not very familiar with this film genre, so maybe these sources are entirely reliable and I'm just not familiar with them. Could you please explain to me what makes these sources reliable before I conduct any GAN reviews...

• IndiaGlitz.com
• OneIndia.in
• Chennai 365
• Sify.com
• BehindWoods.com
• CineSouth.com
• BharatStudent.com
• OnionDosa.net

Let me know ASAP, as we really need to start getting this GAN backlog cleared out. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 03:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

• Ok, well, at first glance, BehindWoods strikes me as a reliable site, but the OneIndia Wikipedia page itself actually describes OneIndia as an unreliable Wikipedia source. I've never seen something like that before. Please understand that I'd like to see these articles make it through the GAN process, and personally I think I tend to take a more liberal position on WP:RS than some editors, but I've seen sites considered more stable than these challenged as unreliable. So I'm just trying to think of the best way we could handle this. I suppose one way would be to look at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources#Questionable sources and produce evidence that these sites don't fit that criteria (by establishing reputation, editorial oversight, that the material isn't promotional, that it doesn't rely on rumors). Another approach, I guess, would be to go to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and get input on the sources there. (IndiaGlitz has already been challenged on the noticeboard a few times, here and here.) Another option is that you might want to consider removing these articles from GAN contention for now, until you can sort this issue out with the reliability. What do you think? — Hunter Kahn 14:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Have you decided what you want to do about this? Should we seek outside opinions on this? Do you want to withdraw the noms for now? Or have you found anything to establish these as reliable source? — Hunter Kahn 02:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
    • Sounds good. Let me know either way. — Hunter Kahn 17:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to barge in, but Behindwoods, reliable? Guys, They publish some odd story - In fact based on my industry contacts, I can refute most of their 'news' items!!Karthik Sriram (talk) 20:05, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Samantha Ruth Prabhu

Hey! Regarding Samantha Ruth Prabhu's article, it is mentioned that is born to a Malayali and Telugu couple, so she is half Malayali and half Telugu, but not Tamil at all. So why adding her name in Tamil language or removing her name in Telugu (or Malayalam)? I think, only the name in her mother tongue, should be added there, shouldn't it? For instance, see Vidya Balan, who is Tamilian, but though she never acted in a Tamil film, her name in Tamil language has been put in her article! What say? Johannes003 (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sneha Bandham

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sneha Bandham, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sneha Bandham. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sreejith K (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TVPvishal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TVPvishal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kaaval

Hello Universal Hero. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kaaval, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Try PROD or AfD instead. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Aayirathil Oruvan GAN: On hold

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I have reviewed the article, and have found issues that should be addressed before the article is passed. The review can be seen here. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, and an extension can be given if progress is being made. Good work on the article so far, and let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or when you are finished. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Please address the remaining image issue so we can conclude the review. If you have questions about it, please let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 20:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

To conclude the review, the image issue will need to be addressed, as images are one of the GA criteria. If you are waiting to upload one of the examples I provided, the current image should be removed. After that, I'll do a final copyedit of the article and pass it. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kuselan

The article Kuselan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kuselan for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I note that you have a further seven film artciles nominated, which all appear to suffer from the same problems that I have found in Kuselan. Might i suggest that you withdraw those nominations until you have sorted out Kuselan and Aayirathil Oruvan to save yourself having to work on all of them at once. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi again, four of your nominated articles are now showing as the oldest nominations at WP:GAN so you may find that they are all failed if you don't get your skates on! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sarvam

The article Sarvam you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article may meet the good article criteria, but only if thorough copy-editing is undertaken. There are also some dubious sources and a dead link. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Sarvam for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Posterdasavatharam.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Posterdasavatharam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --–– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dasavathaaram

The article Dasavathaaram you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Dasavathaaram for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem!

Hey,

thanks for approaching me. Of course, I'll help in whatever way, no problem at all! I will be happy, if I can contribute to get any Tamil articles to GA level. Didn't know that Sarvam was also nominated. Yeah, will go through and help definitely! :) Johannes003 (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Santosh Subramaniam

The article Santosh Subramaniam you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Santosh Subramaniam for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dhaam Dhoom

The article Dhaam Dhoom you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dhaam Dhoom for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeans (film)

The article Jeans (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jeans (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 03:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aayirathiloruvan.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aayirathiloruvan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Blurpeace 04:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Aayirathil Oruvan

Hey, went through the plot and made some minor changes. I'm not an expert at all, but felt that the plot was actually written very well. I tried to help as far as I could. Go over it again, and perhaps you should ask the editor for some advice, where exactly to make corrections and to help out. Here are some lines, I didn't change, but felt should be corrected.

• "They nearly go mad before finally reaching the secret hideout of the Chola dynasty" - I feel this line could be reworded.

• "The central minister, who sponsors the expedition, is also shown to be a Pandyan." - Which central minister, perhaps should be more detailed.

• "The Cholas are at war once again with the Pandyas." - This means they were warring earlier already, has it been mentioned earlier?

That's all for now. I hope I could help a little bit. Cheers and have fun! :) Johannes003 (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

New message

Hey buddy, a couple of days back I had moved the page of Love You Maa to Siddharth Malhotra's Next. According to Karan Johar and the director of the film [on Twitter], the film is still untitled and therefore I decided to move the page. However, I found out today that you decided to redirect the page to LYM. May I know why you did so?? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 15:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey dude,

actually same here. Most probably I'll be very busy too in next weeks, but will try to come here, though. Yeah, I didn't create a user page, wasn't much interested. But since you asked, I'll tell about my likes and dislikes. Some questions are really unfair and hard to answer, like the first one. ;) But I try somehow.

• 1. Rajinikanth or Kamal Haasan: the better actor/star
  • 1. Rajinikanth :) (I'm somehow kind of a Rajini fan, but KH is a great actor, no offense! :) )
• 2. Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam: Rank them in order
  • 2. Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada (Watch mostly Tamil only, hardly watched any other language films)
• 3. Simran or Jyothika: the better actress
  • 3. Jyo ;)
• 4. Vikram, Surya or Madhavan: the better actor
  • 4. Vikram
• 5. Asin or Genelia: the better actress
  • 5. Asin
• 6. Dhanush or Simbu: the actor with the better future
  • 6. Dhanush
• 7. Kajal Aggarwal or Samantha: the actress with the better future
  • 7. Samantha
• 8. The Next Telugu superstar: Ram Charan Teja, Allu Arjun, Rana or Naga Chaitanya
  • 8. Ram Charan Teja perhaps, Telugu is not my cup of tea
• 9. The most promising: Karthi, Arya, Simbu, Dhanush or Jeeva
  • 9. Karthi / Jeeva
• 10. The last film you saw that you really liked
  • 10. Very difficult to say, any films I saw recently were hardly likeable. Paiyaa and VTV perhaps, but it's been a long time since I really thoroughly liked a film.
• 11. The last film you saw that you felt was "pure torture"
  • 11. Oh yeah, many, the last one has to be Thamizh Padam, I guess.
• 12. Your all-time favorite performance/film of Kamal Haasan
  • 12. Again difficult to say, there are many, all-time best should be Nayagan. :)
• 13. Ajith, Vijay, Vikram, Surya: Rank them in order
  • 13. Ajith, Vikram, Vijay, Surya
• 14. Asin, Trisha, Shriya, Nayantara, Tamanna: Rank them in order
  • 14. Asin, Tamanna, Nayantara, Shriya, Trisha (the latter 3 are more on par)
• 15. Mani Ratnam, Shankar, Gautham Menon, Selvaraghavan, Bala: Rank them in order
  • 15. Mani Ratnam, Bala, Shankar, Selvaraghavan, Gautham Menon

These are my preferences, now I would like to know the same about you, though I might know some of your answers. ;) Anyhow, good luck buddy and take care! :) Johannes003 (talk) 09:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaavalkaaran

A tag has been placed on Kaavalkaaran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —SpacemanSpiff 19:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The 19th Step

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The 19th Step. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 19th Step (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Reema to Reemma

Hello Universal, why did u move Reema Sen to Reemma Sen (29 December 2009)? Jay (talk) 09:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Can you respond to a question at Talk:Reemma Sen#The move from Reema to Reemma. Jay (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Kaavalkaaran

I have nominated Kaavalkaaran, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaavalkaaran. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —SpacemanSpiff 05:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Luckaudio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Luckaudio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Lekha

Hey, regarding Lekha, actually it was not me who added Kadhalar Dhinam to the list. I myself was surprised to find the film listed there, but then didn't remove it, since I thought you added it. It's been ages since I watched the film, I have no idea whether she really appears in the film, sorry dude! Johannes003 (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Krishna Sekhar - Name is incorrectly mentioned

Hi Universal Hero

Can u pls edit the name of the Tamil Film Hero "Krishna Sekhar to "Krishna". He is known as Krishna in the Tamil Film Industry and Krishna Sekhar is not his name. Thanks.Charu.suryaprakasam (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christine Zedek‎

The article Christine Zedek‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--Sodabottle (talk) 05:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Anjaadhe gallery 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Anjaadhe gallery 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aegan-Stills-17.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aegan-Stills-17.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dasavathaaram character

Template:Dasavathaaram character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 20:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Classic epic movies

Hey man i just saw your works they are awesome.Why don't you also try to do something in those old films such as chandralekha and many. They are many movies which dont even have page but they are great movies than stuff releasing now. Just a suggestion. Hve a grt day Sunnu308 (talk) 06:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnu308 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Idhu-maalai-nerathu-mayakkam-07-11-08.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Idhu-maalai-nerathu-mayakkam-07-11-08.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Template for deletion

Hi, this may be of interest to you. Apparently it was previously listed for deletion but no one appeared to join the discussion. It would be great if you could comment on it's deletion proposal. EelamStyleZ (talk) 22:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chennaiyil-Oru-Mazhaikaalam.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chennaiyil-Oru-Mazhaikaalam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Krishnaleelai

A tag has been placed on Krishnaleelai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Supertouch (talk) 02:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Removal of Content

Why? Silverseren^C 16:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Varalaxmi Sarathkumar

The article Varalaxmi Sarathkumar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 08:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Album (film)

A tag has been placed on Album (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TYelliot (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Indiscriminate reversion

Your total reversion of the article Kamal Haasan to your last edited version from several weeks ago is unacceptable, considering there have been 55 edits since then, some of which improved the article. Indiscriminately reverting other people's edits is equivalent to asserting total ownership over an article, which is not the way Wikipedia works. AtticusX (talk) 21:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியா

Did you know?
Our target demographic wondering what in the world is WP:ENGVAR A large majority of the Tamil population is more comfortable with Tamil than English Tamil Wikipedia, with 25,000 articles is one of the leading Indic language wikipedias It is easy to type to in Tamil using transliteration tools like E-Kalappai, NHM Writer and Suratha Tamil Wikipedia needs experienced wiki contributors like you to expand exponentially எனவே வாருங்கள்! தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவில் உங்கள் கட்டுரைகளை மொழிபெயருங்கள். உங்களுக்கு பிடித்த விஷயங்களைப் பற்றி த. விக்கியில் புதிதாய் எழுதுங்கள். ஏற்கனவே, சுந்தர், சோடாபாட்டில், லாஜிக் விக்கி போன்ற பல ஆங்கில விக்கிப்பயனர்களின் வரவு தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவை வளர்க்க உதவி வருகிறது. நீங்களும் எங்களுடன் இணைந்தால் தமிழர்களுக்காக தமிழிலேயே கட்டற்ற அறிவுக் களஞ்சியத்தை உருவாக்கி விடலாம்.
இப்படிக்கு, தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியர்கள்

Kamal Referred to

Hi. I want to include this "He is referred by the title -- Universal Hero" in intro. It is neutral as it does not violates article. I need help on this. Please explain in detail. Thanks !!!

--Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply

[2] I dont need to be an "expert" on Surya or any other artist in particular to know and apply basic WP:MOS and WP:V and WP:NPOV principles to the article content. Active Banana (^bananaphone 21:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaalai.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaalai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Bombay High (film)

Are you sure about this redirect? This appears to be a completely different film to Season's Greetings. PC78 (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

HIII

Unnaipol Oruvan - Tamil Version - Plot takes place in Chennai with different locations - Police authority is Inspector General - Mohanlal

Eeenadu - Telugu version - Plot takes place in Hyderbad with different locations - Police authority is Police Commissioner - venkatesh

Watch telugu version in you tube.

Kind Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocktruly18 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leaderpremiere.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leaderpremiere.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC

Please Join Indiancinemamediawiki

[[3]] Indiancinemamediawiki was indian version of Asianmediawiki yes or no? --Sunuraju (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yemaaya.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yemaaya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Kanimozhiaudio.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kanimozhiaudio.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Tamil films of 2011

Hey dear, I've created a page for Tamil films of 2011 now. I saw you had created a list of Tamil films scheduled for a release next year and thought you might want to add them to the page. :) Johannes003 (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:JodiNumberOne.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JodiNumberOne.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Shriya Saran/GA2

Hi. We could use a little help here, and fast. We need to replace some IndiaGlitz, Idlebrain, and a couple other sources with more reliable ones. I did some work over the weekend, but the reviewer is saying its still not enough. You are tied as the number one contributor here; can you help with the final push to GA? BollyJeff || talk 16:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Anwar Saadat

Thought you might want to see this - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shinas. Our friend Anwar has finally been caught and indef blocked (but that hasn't stopped him from running a sock farm). --Sodabottle (talk) 09:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Komagata Maru

Hey bro I wanted to make the article as my article like User:Pravinraj/Komagata Maru (film). How to do it??

Komagata Maru

Whats this "Don't re-add article until it is confirmed. (which I doubt it ever will be)"!! I know what I'm doing please you don't have to say that!! Did I tell the same in your Marmayogi article!! Even your Unnale Unnale aricle It's not a goos article!! Even I can do that!! Please try to encourage young wikipedians, not to underestimate them!! I'm sure you have many wikipedians who can support you in any situation such as Johannes.... But please do not use those kind of words!! (Pravinraj (talk) 05:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC))

Proposed deletion of Helloo India

The article Helloo India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a film allegedly "in production"; sources I find show it as somewhere between in final shooting and post-production; no clear information is given about an actual release; most sources only mention the film in passing. Per WP:CRYSTAL, this should be deleted until the movie is fully confirmed (ideally, released).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Boss Engira Bhaskaran

You are right actually, Arya bought the film for distribution along with Red Giant, but, as far as I know, this film was produced by Vasan Visual Ventures, wasn't it? Johannes003 (talk) 10:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Rattha Charithiram

The website www.behindwoods.com only carries box-office reports of Tamil films (never for dubbed films from Telugu, Hindi, Hollywood), hence why it actually even included Rattha Charithiram, and since (yes half the movie was dubbed), the actor Suriya's scenes were all reshot in tamil, and the film was in fact released as a straight tamil film (watch the start of the movie). So it would actually make sense if it was included in the Top 10 Tamil film. Trishna147 (talk) 23.58, 01 January 2011 (UTC)

Kanthaswamy

Hello Universal Hero! Sorry for disturbing you, but I just want to inform you that I am reviving the move request of the page Kanthaswamy (film) to Kanthaswamy. I realised that it was originally your idea to move the article, and I find the verdict to the previous discussion unfair, because the page was not moved although there were so many people supporting the move to Kanthaswamy. I really hope you can give your opinion about supporting or opposing the page move. Here is the link to the discussion. Thank you so much! Yours faithfully, Kotakkasut. 07:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello again Universal Hero! I didn't hear from you but I am happy to announce to you that the discussion has ended with a happy note and the page has been moved to simply Kanthaswamy. Looks like your wish has been granted! Yours faithfully, Kotakkasut. 14:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Paruthi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paruthiveeran poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Images in film articles

Hi Universal Hero! Thank you for adding an image to Anaganaga O Dheerudu. In the future, can you please remove the request for an image in the Film banner on the talk page like this? Thank you! BOVINEBOY2008 09:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovest2003.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lovest2003.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 12:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 23:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Again some support please!

Hi UH, I see you have been silently improving some article. Great! I'm here to request for some help from you. Again! A new (or maybe not that new) user Sanjay is making big trouble. I know that you will know what is true. Would be glad if you could support us here. Thanks dear! Johannes003 (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Do not give fake details,

We are from the team of Ponnar sankar We appreciate your work and would like to get in touch to set the record straight,give us your email id. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetruthonlywiki (talk • contribs) 07:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Ponnar Sankar

Sorry to bother u universal hero , already said u r giving all fake details , y don't you keep your self update if not surf the net and find the reference do not fake details to to people. I really appreciate your work this is not the way we are changing again and again your doing the same. if you don't know pls dont update (Ponnar sankar team) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetruthonlywiki (talk • contribs) 19:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rags (singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rags (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rags (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 18:08, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Info on Kamal films

Hi frnd, can u provide some info on Kamal Haasan's Malayalam films that released on late 1970s.

Orphaned non-free image File:Villu-2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Villu-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leaderpremiere.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leaderpremiere.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuruvifilm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kuruvifilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Filmfare Awards South

Hi! I found the sources and filled up Filmfare Awards South for Best actor, actress, film and director. But still cant find it before 1972. I've updated the table from 1972. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 04:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Raja Raja Chola Award

		Raja Raja Chola Award
		For your extremely valuable contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamil Nadu

-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 11:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Dhaamdhoomstill.jpg

This file is missing evidence of permission. It has an author and source, but there is no proof that the author of the file agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit grant of permission that complies with the licensing policy or by forwarding email communication granting permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey you make awesome edits. Why don't you try to develop few old tamil classic movies as they don't even have proper pages. As for new movies they are many people ready to edit, but we need some reputed people like you to edit old tamil movies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samblack8210 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Unnale Unnale

I have placed Unnale Unnale up for reassessment. I think you were a major contributor. Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Unnale Unnale/1 BollyJeff || talk 16:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nootrukku Nooru (2011 film)

The article Nootrukku Nooru (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFF, looks like it got stuck in production hell

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaksar (let's chat) 06:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Polladhavan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Polladhavan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kodi1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kodi1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

GA nom of Vikram

Hi, I think it's too early to nominate the article for GA. The article has been expanded many folds by you, but still there are some unreliable sources. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 15:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

I really appreciate your work on the article. I know how difficult is to find sources for his films released before Sethu. Though many consider "Indiaglitz" and "beindwoods" as reliable some reviewers might not accept it. Also I doubt if "Thiraipadam.com" is reliable. Anyway, I'll also try to replace those with reliable ones. Finally, I'm happy to see you back again :) --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 02:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Karthi

Hello, the article needs an image for the infobox. I tried hard without any luck so far. It will be good if you upload one image of him. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 08:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, no can do. Universal Hero (talk) 21:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kodiesvaran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kodiesvaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodiesvaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Commander _{(Ping Me)} 18:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kodi1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kodi1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kodisvarankarishma.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kodisvarankarishma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Universal Hero! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vikram (actor)

The article Vikram (actor) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vikram (actor) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? ASHU^IND 09:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Boyspostershankar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boyspostershankar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Universal Hero for helping to promote Karthi to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 08:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Dheera (film)

Hi, Universal Hero. I invite you to take part in this deletion discussion. Thanks! EelamStyleZ (talk) 01:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Sathya (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sathya (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sathya (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Muhandes (talk) 13:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Thalaivan Irukkiraan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thalaivan Irukkiraan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalaivan Irukkiraan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:51, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ganeshkar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ganeshkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wikieditindia (talk) 06:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aadhya Paadham

The article Aadhya Paadham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film and unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJay^{Talk to me} 02:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dasavatharam sherwat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dasavatharam sherwat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2lmuff5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2lmuff5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Screenshot from Yavarum Nalam.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot from Yavarum Nalam.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anumodhanam

The article Anumodhanam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film and unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Athiradee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athiradee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athiradee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Vivvt^Talk 16:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Balleilakka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balleilakka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balleilakka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Vivvt^Talk 16:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Sahana (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahana (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahana (song) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Vivvt^Talk 16:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Style (2007 song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Style (2007 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Style (2007 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Vivvt^Talk 16:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Vaaji Vaaji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vaaji Vaaji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaaji Vaaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Vivvt^Talk 16:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Anuya Bhagvath

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nee Ente Lahari

The article Nee Ente Lahari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. Fails WP:NFF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashta Maangalyam

The article Ashta Maangalyam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. Fails WP:NFF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012

Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call)

You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)

You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume III, No. 2 – November 2012 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Request for Comment: An RFC about the Backlog Elimination Drives has been started this month. Go and voice your opinions! Featured editorial: A Matter of Time: The Future of Backlog Elimination Drives Project News: Over 345 unreviewed articles, 13 at reassessment Good Articles of the Month GA Task Forces: A calmed GA community awaiting for an RFC Member News: 223 members of the GA Wikiproject Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 November 2012

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume III, No. 3 – December 2012 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: "Drive-By Reviews": A Retrospective About Reviews During Backlog Drives Project News: A backlog elimination drive is being held now at GAN. Good Articles of the Month: Our picks for November, 150+ promotions. GA Task Forces: Results from the Backlog Elimination RfC Member News: 227 members of WikiProject Good Articles and counting Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 December 2012

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jaggubhai.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Jaggubhai.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Skyfall by Hahc21. Project News: A record, and issue and a future. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 190 articles passed in December! GA Task Forces: Results from the drive Member News: Two crucial users leave the project Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 3 January 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Vishal (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishal (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 2 – February 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Time to make a Sweep by Hahc21. Project News: Several proposals are currently ongoin at the project, including two requests for comment. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 282 articles passed in January! GA Task Forces: Some minor notes this month Member News: Member news Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 12 February 2012

Speedy deletion nomination of Ameer (director)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ameer (director) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Mitta Miraasu, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Mitta Miraasu" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Good Article Nominations Request For Comment

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 00:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Hazel Keech for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazel Keech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazel Keech until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tiptoety ^talk 18:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK RfC

• As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions02:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:14680661 guruen7.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:14680661 guruen7.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 14:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Aalavandhaan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Aalavandhaan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 14:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Devadarshini

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devadarshini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Need your attention!

Hey, I saw that you have created this page Arjunan Kadhali. It's not been updated since 2 months. Can you please update it? -- L o g X 21:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Polladhavan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Polladhavan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Agaram(film)

Hello Universal Hero,

This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I took the liberty to slightly expand your article, adding relevant references. Hopefully, you'd like my little effort. I'd appreciate your say on this matter. Best regards, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC))

Proposed deletion of Swimming Pool (1976 film)

The article Swimming Pool (1976 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability of films

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashirvadam

The article Ashirvadam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability of films

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swimming Pool (1976 film)

The article Swimming Pool (1976 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FILMNOT. Doesn't have other evidences of notability. Theatrical release alone may not be sufficient to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! A GAN Backlog Drive will begin in less than 4 days! In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate per review. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00. At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the Backlog Drive talk page. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--EdwardsBot (talk) 03:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013! If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive! If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 23:56, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Filmfare Awards South

Template:Infobox Filmfare Awards South has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

• This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
• Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
• The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
• An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers. Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC) To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

Orphaned non-free image File:Sethuvikram.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sethuvikram.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jai Surya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jai Surya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Surya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jai Surya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jai Surya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chennai600028.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai600028.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:JodiNumberOne.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JodiNumberOne.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JodiNumberOne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JodiNumberOne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Soora Samhaaram

The article Soora Samhaaram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged for notability for 2 years and for lack of sourcing for over a year, no evidence provided of meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JodiNumberOne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JodiNumberOne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Universal Hero/Tamil actresses

User:Universal Hero/Tamil actresses, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Universal Hero/Tamil actresses and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Universal Hero/Tamil actresses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kodiesvaran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kodiesvaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodiesvaran (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Universal Hero/List of highest grossing Tamil-language films

User:Universal Hero/List of highest grossing Tamil-language films, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Universal Hero/List of highest grossing Tamil-language films and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Universal Hero/List of highest grossing Tamil-language films during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Following Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Universal Hero/Tamil actresses, your list is still present at User:Universal Hero/Sandbox2. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuselan-jun20-2008-001.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kuselan-jun20-2008-001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kuselan-jun20-2008-001.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kuselan-jun20-2008-001.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaalai-stills-59.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaalai-stills-59.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amara Prema for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amara Prema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara Prema until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heera Rajagopal

The article Heera Rajagopal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 01:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sara Arjun

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sara Arjun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr. Nair Talk 08:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

What is A. L. Vijay's connection to Vijay Anand?

For some weird reason you seem to have made Vijay Anand (director) redirect to A. L. Vijay's page. Why?

Vijay Anand (director) was linked to previously from Shekhar Kapur's page. Since obviously A. L. Vijay is NOT Kapur's uncle and Dev Anand or Chetan Anand (director)'s brother, I changed the link to point to Vijay Anand (Hindi film maker) instead.

This leaves the Vijay Anand (director) redirect completely unused at present. Since I see absolutely no reason for Vijay Anand (director) to redirect to A. L. Vijay, why not delete the redirect so that we can use Vijay Anand (director) for Dev Anand's brother, just as we use Chetan Anand (director) for his other brother? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.57.22.165 (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Kanimozhiaudio.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kanimozhiaudio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JodiNumberOne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JodiNumberOne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Anniyan.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anniyan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Audiodahaam.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Audiodahaam.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Mozhi.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mozhi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Jeyam-Kondaan-stills-002.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeyam-Kondaan-stills-002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Guru-may2-2008.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Guru-may2-2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Audiokuselan.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Audiokuselan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Engeyumkaadhalaudio.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Engeyumkaadhalaudio.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Kandencd.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kandencd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tanuwedsmanu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tanuwedsmanu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mahaguru for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahaguru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahaguru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashmith Kunder

The article Ashmith Kunder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.Can't see how he passes SNG either!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 09:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Villu-2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Villu-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mahamagam-6.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mahamagam-6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Yash Shah (Rubber Boy)

Hi, I am yash shah. I am a contortionist. So I am requesting you that please make wikipedia for me.

You can search about me on google please search "yash Shah rubber boy".

Please open this link for more details about me : -

http://www.superhumansencyclopedia.com/yash-shah-rubber-boy-india/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:8101:2D74:0:0:231D:70A5 (talk) 09:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jodi Number One

Template:Jodi Number One has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

"Ghajini (2007 film) (2007 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ghajini (2007 film) (2007 film). Since you had some involvement with the Ghajini (2007 film) (2007 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 19:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ayul Regai

The article Ayul Regai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Pidichirukku for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pidichirukku, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pidichirukku until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yavarum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yavarum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Alaiyadikkuthu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaiyadikkuthu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaiyadikkuthu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 21:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Agra (2007 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agra (2007 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra (2007 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 20:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Amudhey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amudhey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amudhey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 01:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chikkubukku.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chikkubukku.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mahamagam-6.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mahamagam-6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

"Vijay(actor)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vijay(actor) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Vijay(actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kadhal Kaditham

The article Kadhal Kaditham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notable sources/reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Orphaned non-free image File:Aatanayagan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aatanayagan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

"Siddharth Malhotra's Next" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Siddharth Malhotra's Next and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Siddharth Malhotra's Next until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

"Anurag Singh's Next" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anurag Singh's Next and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Anurag Singh's Next until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lesamusic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lesamusic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kattuviriyan

The article Kattuviriyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 1 review found and no other sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Aayirathil Oruvan (2010 film)

Aayirathil Oruvan (2010 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Erum Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erum Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erum Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jupitus Smart 15:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Shivam Dwivedi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr Shivam Dwivedi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Thairiyam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thairiyam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thairiyam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 08:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kalinga (film)

The article Kalinga (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entire article relies on a single review. No other reviews or sources found (non-passing mentions).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello,

I took the liberty to redirect the page. If you think I made a mistake, feel free to revert. Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

"Garnier fruits" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Garnier fruits has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 28 § Garnier fruits until a consensus is reached. Natg 19 (talk) 18:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chennai600028.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai600028.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)