Open main menu

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

  (Redirected from Wikipedia:RFUD)

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or rejected Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages and files which have already been deleted. If the page you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents


Crown Parliamentary Copyright portraitsEdit

Crown Copyright (fair use) portraits. They were not made for Getty. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Per above. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

  • @Muboshgu: Can you please have a look at restoring these photos? AlbanGeller (talk) 21:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    AlbanGeller, it appears that Fastily deleted these under WP:CSD#F7 as invalid fair use claims. I see that Ashok Kumar has images, which would validate that the fair use claim is invalid. Why do you believe F7 was incorrect? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    Muboshgu, F7 is incorrect because these official portraits were not commissioned by Getty. They were commissioned by the UK Parliament in 2005. These portraits are therefore covered under Crown copyright restrictions. Getty does not own this copyright. (File:Ashok Kumar.jpg depicts Ashok Kumar (British politician), not the primary topic, of which there is no known free representation.) AlbanGeller (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    AlbanGeller, thanks for clarifying that I had the wrong Ashok Kumar. I'm not a subject of the crown so I'm not particularly familiar with crown copyright. I am also busy atm so I won't be able to look into it in depth until sometime later. If someone else can determine one way or another on these files, I would be appreciative. Otherwise, I'll read up on it later. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    Muboshgu, Crown copyright simply means that these works are protected by the state, for as long as 50 years after first publication. Works covered by this copyright are not intended for commercial use, and because of this, WP:GETTY cannot apply to these files. In light of this, the fair-use claim for these files was entirely consistent with the original intent of these images. AlbanGeller (talk) 23:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    If these are crown copyright, then why are you sourcing them from Getty? I'll support restoration if you provide source(s) substantiating your claims. -FASTILY 06:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
    Fastily, Getty is the only website that still hosts (most of) the 2005 portrait collection. Currently, the official Parliament website only hosts the most recent, 2017 portrait collection, under the Open Parliament Licence (itself a licence for Crown copyright). Given the 2017 batch is covered by Crown copyright for depicting each member with their own portrait photograph, it can be inferred that the 2005 batch is also covered by this copyright. AlbanGeller (talk) 07:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
I think only the 2017 images are open source. The previous images not so: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/use-of-parliamentary-photographic-images/. DrKay (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Exactly. The previous images are protected by Crown copyright. AlbanGeller (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
@Fastily: In light of the above, can you please restore these files? AlbanGeller (talk) 19:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The source I've provided provides no proof that they are Crown copyright. In fact, it indicates quite the opposite. DrKay (talk) 19:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks DrKay, your source appears to specifically refer to parliamentary copyright. Therefore, {{Non-free Parliamentary copyright}} should suffice for these files. AlbanGeller (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
@Muboshgu: It's been established that these files fall under {{Non-free Parliamentary copyright}}. Can you possibly restore them on this basis? AlbanGeller (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  Not done You need to convince Fastily to undelete or take it to WP:DRV. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
I'd strongly prefer if a different, uninvolved admin makes the final call. -FASTILY 06:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Since no evidence has been presented that someone other than Getty holds the copyright, I am declining to restore them. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Emailed Parliament for confirmation on the issue; watch this space. AlbanGeller (talk) 07:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Sir Anthony Meyer.jpgEdit

Screencap of ITN interview (fair use) that aired before Getty was founded. —AlbanGeller (talk) 17:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

You'll need to talk to the deleting admin or use WP:DRV given the reason for deletion. I doubt you'll get very far with that rationale, Getty's business model appears to consist of acquiring the rights to pictures taken by other people. Hut 8.5 22:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hut 8.5, the copyright is owned by ITN on licence to Getty. AlbanGeller (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
This process is only for requesting that pages deleted for uncontroversial reasons be restored, that doesn't include this one. You'll need to get the deleting admin to restore it or bring it to deletion review. WP:GETTY forbids all fair use claims on images from Getty, I don't think that whether Getty holds the copyright will make much difference as the rationale is respect for commercial opportunities. Hut 8.5 22:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hut 8.5, the file was simply derived from a single frame of 30-year-old footage. Therefore, {{Non-free television screenshot}} applies, in respect of commercial opportunity. AlbanGeller (talk) 23:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  Not done You need to convince Fastily to undelete or take it to WP:DRV. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
@JJMC89: Evidence that ITN owns the copyright for this file. AlbanGeller (talk) 07:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Fastily, for this image, the copyright is unambiguously owned by ITN. AlbanGeller (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:StartupSoftEdit

I, Kylysav, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kylysav (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Eugenia Dunlap PottsEdit

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:DC SolarEdit

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Nellie Talbot KinkeadEdit

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Women Help WomenEdit

I, Triacylglyceride, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Triacylglyceride (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:BioPac'rEdit

I, Wyobiomass, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wyobiomass (talk) 20:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

work on it —Wyobiomass (talk) 20:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Doug TaylorEdit

In 2006 an administrator who seems to have left the project deleted an article on a Doug Taylor, as A7. This is, no doubt, a common name. There is a Toronto-based historian, author of several books [1]. I request someone check the deleted article, and, if it is about the fellow from Toronto, userify it for me. Thanks. Geo Swan (talk) 10:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC) —Geo Swan (talk) 10:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

  Not done Geo Swan, the article was about an engineer, and more than half of it is about the non-notable company he works/worked for. A7 was the right call. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Muboshgu I am going to call this   Done, as I only needed userification if he was the Toronto-based historian, so thanks for confirming he was not that guy. Geo Swan (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

User:אלינור1977/sandbox/Eyal ShifroniEdit

I, 2A00:A040:196:6075:CFE:2D45:ACF8:F788, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A00:A040:196:6075:CFE:2D45:ACF8:F788 (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


"I want to make changes in the article and publish it" "Publish changes" button below —2A00:A040:196:6075:CFE:2D45:ACF8:F788 (talk) 10:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

AppViewXEdit

The information we've given is genuine and not promotional. We've cited third-party articles as well to substantiate the information. —Vidhyaappviewx (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that you are obligated to disclose any paid or contractual relationship per our Terms of Use. Note that if the PROD is removed or otherwise contested after the fact, I will encourage @David Gerard: to take it to WP:Articles for deletion. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Onward to 2020 22:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

draft: GavagaiEdit

we will continue writing this article; we are waiting for a further source to appear shortly in English since non-English sources were not approved by the previous editors —Jussi Karlgren (talk) 14:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Leo PiccioliEdit

I, Lyotard98, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lyotard98 (talk) 14:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Destin C. HallEdit

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tangofoxx (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Joey_PrimianiEdit

I, 2601:647:4001:7980:9D68:CF70:AC35:5CD5, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:647:4001:7980:9D68:CF70:AC35:5CD5 (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G4. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Joey_PrimianiEdit

I, 2601:647:4001:7980:9D68:CF70:AC35:5CD5, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:647:4001:7980:9D68:CF70:AC35:5CD5 (talk) 05:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:ChorgaliyaEdit

I, Aman Palariya, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aman Palariya (talk) 11:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Raj&PabloEdit

I, LisaThorne007, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LisaThorne007 (talk) 15:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

My invoice took 6 months to be paid, by which time the article has been deleted. [and then click the "Publish changes" button below] — LisaThorne007 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Please read WP:PAID and see if it applies to you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

List of highways bypassed by Interstate HighwaysEdit

Draft:Charles Alexander MoffatEdit

I, MarkZusab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarkZusab (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dominic CoveyEdit

I, MarkZusab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarkZusab (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done I know it was deleted by a MfD, but the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dominic Covey was quite weak, and the deletion rationale was that it was an abandoned draft, which we do undelete if it was G13. So, I'm WP:IAR restoring this. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Emmanuel (artist)Edit

I, MarkZusab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarkZusab (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Paul DryeEdit

I, MarkZusab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarkZusab (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Paul Drye, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Richard RanalloEdit

I, MarkZusab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarkZusab (talk) 23:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Richard Ranallo, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lynn Canal ConservationEdit

I, Truth46add2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Truth46add2 (talk) 02:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:01, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Tampa BayareaEdit

Talk page was deleted when it should have instead been moved back to Talk:Tampa Bay Area. Please restore the talk page and move it back to where it belongs. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – Muboshgu (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

sumitsaniwalEdit

{{subst:refund|1= sumitsaniwal |2= my page id real please review my page this is the news paper of dainik bhasker hisar check the red bock


i am music video director & [1]

i can give my links also https://www.hungama.com/artist/sumit-saniwal/157828888/ https://www.jiosaavn.com/artist/sumit-saniwal-albums/iZ,o67oBhAA_ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/entertainment/music/haryanvi/latest-haryanvi-song-cute-sung-by-nav-roy/videoshow/68886080.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/entertainment/music/haryanvi/latest-haryanvi-song-chhod-ke-alone-tane-chali-jaungi-sung-by-vishal-sachdeva/videoshow/71098086.cms https://gaana.com/song/beautiful-girl-141 https://www.amazon.com/Melons-feat-Ajooba-Explicit/dp/B07GXP847W — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitsaniwal (talkcontribs) 10:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Not done given the reason for deletion you will need to speak to the deleting admin or use WP:DRV. We strongly discourage people from writing articles about themselves. Hut 8.5 17:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


References

  1. ^ haryanvi films

Draft:Raj&PabloEdit

I, LisaThorne007, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LisaThorne007 (talk) 13:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 17:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kuppili PadmaEdit

I, 183.83.246.86, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 183.83.246.86 (talk) 13:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 18:01, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Aleem ZafarEdit

Hi i'm getting a message (G13: Abandoned draft or AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see i would like to edit this article —Hiraali87 (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  • The only contents of the most recent version were "Hi, we have the copyrights for Aleemzafar.com & we are donating all the information there and allowing wikipedia to use everything copy pasted from there to here", which there's no point in restoring. The previous versions were copyright violations, which we don't restore on request. If you really do own the copyright to the content then see here for instructions to prove that, but you should read WP:COI before making any further edits related to the topic. Hut 8.5 18:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
  Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Charles Alexander MoffatEdit

I, MarkZusab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarkZusab (talk) 17:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 18:10, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Writers Guild of America Awards/topic coordinationEdit

Accidently created mainpage, nominated it for G7, talk page was an unfortunate casualty. —–MJLTalk 18:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done Hut 8.5 18:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Universe (type theory) ‎Edit

G13; not the creator but seems like a plausible topic to cover —Taku (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

BhatrajuEdit

There are enough mentions and scholarly articles on this particular community. There is even a Ph.D. dissertation where the origin and history of the community has prominent coverage. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Reo kwon (talk) 08:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ji ZheEdit

I'm planning to expand the article (assuming it's about the basketball player) —Zanhe (talk) 10:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Zanhe, it's about a volleyball player. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
  Not done Then never mind, I'll create the article directly. Thanks for checking. -Zanhe (talk) 23:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:MrASinghEdit

I, Laptirma, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Laptirma (talk) 17:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


  •   Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:JalopnikEdit

I, TwoThousandMiles, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TwoThousandMiles (talk) 01:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Daniel ElderEdit

I, Snooby2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Snooby2 (talk) 03:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Nishabdham poster.jpgEdit

Must be restored to Nishabdham. —Kailash29792 (talk) 05:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dénes König PrizeEdit

G13; not the creator but the topic is likely notable according to my quick Google search. —Taku (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Hector Michael PatmoreEdit

I want to redraft it to respond to the reviewer's comments and resubmit for review —Chris M Mass (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Martin Hill (councillor)Edit

I would like this page to be userfied or restored to the draft namespace so that I can continue to improve it. —Noswall59 (talk) 10:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Noswall59/Martin Hill (councillor). – Muboshgu (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Antidepressant ConsumptionEdit

I, Berfinkara, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Berfinkara (talk) 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Motorcycle Roadracing AssociationEdit

I, Jjbbrewer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjbbrewer (talk) 13:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Bobby Wealth CraigEdit

I, RXPyro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Rxpyro (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Wealth Craig, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Lourdes (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 22:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Robocoder CorporationEdit

I, Akitsu42, request the undeletion of this draft submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Akitsu42 (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. Hut 8.5 22:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Japan Electric Power Exchange (JEPX)Edit

G13; not the creator; very likely notable (and so no need for deletion) —Taku (talk) 23:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 23:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Matt TarrantEdit

I, Reedandwrite, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reedandwrite (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Drowneded/sandboxEdit

I, Drowneded, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drowneded (talk) 02:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Arman AliEdit

Kindly review the page and consider restoring —Itswikimallik (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:NOPHOTOEdit

I, Wikiabulafia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wikiabulafia (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 15:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Domotz ProEdit

I, Wdelisio, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wdelisio (talk) 15:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 15:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:The Mansfield RuleEdit

G13ed draft, requested restoration to work on at the teahouse. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Teahouse#New Submission - The Mansfield Rule ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
  Done as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Port House GrillEdit

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 24.101.129.68 (talk) 17:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. —C.Fred (talk) 20:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stephen SonnenbergEdit

I, RCUT426, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RCUT426 (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I can't check the draft against the link for the copyvio, but it was different enough from the version of Stephen Sonnenberg that was deleted G12 that there does not appear to be a violation. @Praxidicae: If you have time and access to the source and would like to check the draft, I would be grateful.
@RCUT426: Please make sure to address the concerns raised in the prior reviews of the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Art PrisonEdit

I, CulturalShock, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CulturalShock (talk) 22:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
@CulturalShock: Please make sure to work on the draft once it is restored. It was restored back in February, but no work was done, so it was deleted almost six months to the day after recreation. —C.Fred (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Victoria EmslieEdit

I, Suepipe, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Suepipe (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


Wish to continue editing following long period of inactivity - many news articles to add and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Suepipe (talk) 01:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

  Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Suepipe: Make sure to work on the draft. If it sits untouched for six months, it is subject to being deleted again. —C.Fred (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

File:ATCCOLombia3186.jpgEdit

The publisher of this image expressed his consent for me to use it in a wikipedia page in the photos comments on the website. The person who deleted, simply looked at the website and deleted it probably thinking it was a copyright violation. It is under fair use and the owner explicitly gave me rights to using the image on wikipedia. I am going to use this image on the page ATC Colombia. —Articute (talk) 02:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

@Articute: There is no such thing as permission to use an image on Wikipedia. The copyright owner either needs to place it under a free license, so anybody can use it, or the image has to meet the non-free content criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Local Linearization MethodEdit

G13; not the creator; *probably* legitimate topic (so make sense to keep developing it) —Taku (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Logic problems and computingEdit

G13; not the creator but the topic is likely legit —Taku (talk) 05:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)