Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
CategoryList (sorting)
TalkBy subject
Reviewing instructions
Helper script

Welcome to the Wikipedia Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions to Wikipedia. Are you in the right place?
  • For your own security, please do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page; we are unable to provide answers via email.
  • Please keep in mind that we are all volunteers, and sometimes a reply may take a little time. Your patience is appreciated.
  • Bona fide reviewers at Articles for Creation will never contact or solicit anyone for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article. If someone contacts you with such an offer, please post on this help desk page.
Click here to ask a new question.

A reviewer should soon answer your question on this page. Please check back often.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions

October 18Edit

00:05:04, 18 October 2020 review of submission by Tuesdaymorning20Edit

Tuesdaymorning20 (talk) 00:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Sophie Santos is an American comedian and writer. There are notable references including on Amazon Publishing's site. I am a non biased individual.

Amazon is not an acceptable source under any circumstance, and a author's publisher is not a reliable secondary source. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 00:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

01:34:54, 18 October 2020 review of submission by AamirabusyEdit

Hi! As I can see Sahnil Bhatnagar has more than a million followers as well as he is into acting. How can I get his page on wikipedia? could you please help me because his all other co-actors have their own wikipedia page and he deserves to be here. Please guide me.

I could find 7 news articles about him, I was able to manage to find his IMDB links. Please help! Thank you! Regards Aamira

Aamirabusy (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

02:14:43, 18 October 2020 review of submission by AamirabusyEdit

Hi Zooden, I guess you are not from India but in India, Sahnil videos are very viral and he s having a good amount of fan following. I also got to know about him through my younger brother who is a big fan of him and then I searched about him and found his videos very cool. He is an actor I have started watching his show MTV Warrior high on youtube and he is doing great. I see all his co-actors having their wikipedia. I suppose you should give him a chance and keep him on wikipedia for sometime to see. My brother told me that on his live he mentioned that he is going to some web series soon. Anyways it would be great if you go through all of his videos,work and pictures. I saw a fan making a permanent Tattoo of his name that means he is notable. Because if someone is making permanent tattoo that means he is a notable person. Please have a look at these videos which i just found on his instagram handle Wow! We done even need proof. These pictures and videos says it all. This guy deserves. Please let me know your advice. Generally I guess editors focus on news articles but videos and pictures are the best proof. Thank you for your time! Just sharing my feelings. Oone his profile is on wikipedia. I'll message him on instagram. I hope he replies. Best Regards Aamira HR Consultant

Aamirabusy (talk) 02:14, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Aamirabusy: I'm afraid that you have a common misconception about what Wikipedia contains. Wikipedia does not contain profiles, not a single one. Wikipedia has encyclopedic articles about topics that satisfy Wikipedia's special definition of notability, in this case a noteable person. Please also be aware that nobody "owns" a Wikipedia article in the sence they can say what's on there. Intagram and other social networks are commonly regarded as an unreliable source. The linked draft was deleted today morning. If you want to get it back, please ask at WP:REFUND. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Aamirabusy, the article you have re-created was the same one that the sockpuppets have persistently added and resulted in the draft space being create protected. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sahnil Bhatnagar. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Aamirabusy, why are you contacting Sahnil? This reeks of conflict of interest and paid editing. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I am not paid to edit anything, I am just doing this for my younger brother because he admires him a lot. As I had mentioned above that I got to know about this through my brother. Sahnil doesn't even know me and I had said I will message Sahnil, I HOPE HE REPLIES , I wanted Sahnil to reply me if I am able to create his wikipedia because this is the only way my younger brother can talk with him. I am working as a HR Managar and I am earning good. I dont want this money Sir. You are taking me in a wrong way. I am a 28 years working lady. Since, This s all messed up here I just hope Sahnil doesn't gets to know about this. I still request you guys to reconsider his article. God bless you! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamirabusy (talkcontribs) 17:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Aamirabusy, you need to rewrite the article from scratch, not use the old ones that keep getting resubmitted and therefore deleted. Do not source IMDb. That is user-generated and not a reliable source. As I discussed in the MFD, he is borderline not notable. He only has one recurring role in that Warriors show. Wikipedia requires entertainers have multiple significant roles in major productions. This role is not discussed in detail in any newspaper articles presented so far. Elovator Pitch is not a major role, but a minor/guest role as a participant. Other than that, he had a brief event fame for dating a woman in Brazil over Likee. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 AngusW🐶🐶 OK I will rewrite everything. Please open this draft so that I can rewrite again and I will just post relevant articles. Thanks for understanding! I will try again . MTV Elovator Pitch I have seen it was a great show and he was one charm in that show, as well as MTV Warrior high I am watching, even you can watch to see him. He is doing great there too. Talking about his LIKEE experience well yes I saw his videos and he is quite famous in India and Brazil. Now will you please allow me to make a new article from scrath here? Should It be a stub article only na? Because it will be a short article about him.

Please guide me! Best Regards Aamira

I reframed everything. please make the desired changes. Draft:Sahnil_Bhatnagar_(Actor) Thank you for your suppot. It means a lot, finally my younger brother will be happy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamirabusy (talkcontribs) 21:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: OP has been indef-blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sahil9610. --Finngall talk 03:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

02:29:03, 18 October 2020 review of submission by CarthexEdit

Hello Wiki, I just made some changes on my Talk page, Kindly preview and let me know if it meet up for your approval, have been working on this several times but my Talk page was not approved Carthex (talk) 02:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Carthex: still no evidence how this subject meets WP:NPERSON. If you come to this help desk another time, please bring your WP:THREE with you. If you have questions if a particular source would meet the criteria, try looking at WP:RSN archives, WP:RSP, or ask here or at the teahouse. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

06:52:15, 18 October 2020 review of submission by PaulGorduiz106Edit

PaulGorduiz106 (talk) 06:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

14:53:44, 18 October 2020 review of submission by Aryanfanpage24Edit

I have created this page for Aryan Rao pippal and everything on this page is real and genuine, I 100% believe that if this page go live ,it will get the very good amount of attention because of the popularity of Aryan Rao Pippal in hong kong and India, so it is a humble request from the fans of Aryan Rao Pippal to allow this page. Thank you Aryanfanpage24 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Aryanfanpage24: Wikipedia isn't interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim you want to make will need to be backed up by a reliable source. We dont make exceptions for verifyability. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

16:33:06, 18 October 2020 review of submission by RbshadowEdit

(talk) 16:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Rbshadow You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. This is because it is a blatant promotional piece for the colleges, telling about its offerings. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the college, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 20:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

18:07:13, 18 October 2020 review of submission by AminuddinshroffEdit

Aminuddinshroff (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Moin-ud-din is my late father and notable personality. Unfortunately, there are no references available online than what I have mentioned in the article. Esmayeel Shroff is his brother and I had created his article as well which had references. You may check the films tagged under his name has his name on it. Any help in getting this page/article published would be helpful. It is currently sitting in my sandbox.

It would appear that, if that is the case, that your father would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. If independent reliable sources write about his work, he might in the future. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

19:08:10, 18 October 2020 review of submission by AbonentiEdit

Abonenti (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Abonenti You don't ask a question, but your draft was not an encyclopedia article and was promotional. 331dot (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

October 19Edit

01:33:30, 19 October 2020 review of draft by RecyclingrightEdit

Hello! I have tried several times submitting my draft AfC, however the 'submission-received' box has not appeared at the bottom of the page. I believe that I have authored the article correctly with very notable sources, but it does not seem to be pending review. I just want to confirm it is on the waitlist to be reviewed.

Thank you for your time! Recyclingright (talk) 01:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

I just tried submitting the draft for you, and I also could not get it to work. I'm not sure what's going on here, but someone more experienced than me should definitely take a look. AviationFreak💬 03:10, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Recyclingright, I resubmitted the draft under your name. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 06:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
@Recyclingright, AviationFreak, and AngusWOOF: There is an unclosed html comment on the page, preventing anything below from appearing. I will fix it as soon as possible. Victor Schmidt (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

01:50:10, 19 October 2020 review of draft by ImranAaýan99Edit

ImranAaýan99 (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

You haven't asked a question, but your draft lacks any sources. Please also see WP:AUTOBIO. AviationFreak💬 03:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

02:27:59, 19 October 2020 review of submission by Robertleyva2002Edit

Robertleyva2002 (talk) 02:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

You haven't asked a question, but your draft was declined because it does not show WP:N. AviationFreak💬 03:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

05:30:43, 19 October 2020 review of submission by Karthik CLEdit

Dear Sir,

I have included some more information which should boost the notability of the subject. Please have a look at the page and suggest changes if required.

Karthik CL (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

09:17:57, 19 October 2020 review of draft by Henry CuevasEdit

I would like to request support regarding an article that I wrote. The article is about a medical device company that develops and manufactures mesh nebulizers. I added references to describe events related to the company and information from websites and publications; however, the article has been rejected twice because references from news outlets and other websites are not considered valid.

I will very much appreciate some guidance on how to overcome this issue, as I have noticed that other articles contain the same type of references, but have been successfully published.

Thank you for your support.

Henry Cuevas (talk) 09:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Henry Cuevas Note that other similar articles existing is not a reason for yours to exist, see other stuff exists. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us. We can only address what we know about. Standards also change over time, so that what was once acceptable is no longer. If you'd care to point out some of these other articles, we can address them; we could use the help.
Regarding your draft, it is sourced to nothing but press releases or routine information. That does not establish notability as defined by Wikipedia, for companies that is defined at WP:ORG. A Wikipedia article needs to summarize significant coverage found in independent reliable sources that have chosen on their own to write about the subject. That does not include press releases(which are not independent), announcements of routine business transactions, or brief mentions(such as basic company information). Please see Your First Article for more information.
If you work for or are otherwise associated with this company, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on disclosures you could be required to make. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

10:33:45, 19 October 2020 review of submission by DipSagarregmi12Edit

DipSagarregmi12 (talk) 10:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

This page has been rejected and as such will not be considered further. Repeatedly submitting a draft without making significant changes to address the reviewers' concerns is a waste of their time and yours. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 11:10, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

12:07:50, 19 October 2020 review of submission by CaptiliaEdit

Captilia (talk) 12:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

12:07:50, 19 October 2020 review of submission by Captilia

Hello I'm have hard times to publish any article .. Kindly advise

@Captilia: I assume this referes to User:Captilia/sandbox. I have so far seen the following problems:
  • The page reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia does not host advertisements. It contains peacock terms. If I were to grab a red pen and mark everything that falls under this pint, there is not much left.
  • The page makes excessive use of <big>-Tags. Normally, you shouldn't need to use them at all.
  • The page makes excessive use of bold text. use it sparingly.
  • The page currently fails WP:V. If I were to determine where the information in the draft comes from ,I would need to grab google myself.
  • In conjunction with the previous point, the draft also fails to meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG.
  • The draft uses external links in the article body. this is not allowed. Plain external links are only allowed in a specific section, usally called "External links".
  • Upon a routine investigation, I also determined that a substancial amount of text is identical to the organisation website. Please never do that. Even if we could get the legal aspects resolved, 99% of the texts not written for Wikipedia is also unsiutable for Wikipedia (see the first point).
For future attempts, try to follow these steps:
  • First, review our guideline on notability, our policy on Verifiability, and our general notability guideline (GNG). Consider whether your subject clearly meets the standards listed there. Also, check if the topic is already covered, perhaps under a different spelling or in a section of an article about a wider topic. You will waste a lot of time, if you create a new article, and then find that the encyclopedia already has an article about that.
  • Second, read how to create Your First Article and referencing for beginners and again consider if you want to go ahead.
  • Third, If you have any connection or affiliation with the subject, disclose it in accordance with our guideline on Conflict of interest. If you have been or expect to be paid for making edits, or are making them as part of your job, disclose this according to the strict rules of the Paid-contribution disclosure. This is absolutely required; omitting it can result in you being blocked from further editing.
  • Fourth, gather sources. You want independent, professionally published, reliable sources with each discussing the subject in some detail. If you can't find several such sources, stop; an article will not be created! Sources do NOT need to be online, or in English, although it is helpful if at least some are. The "independent" part is vital. Wikipedia does not consider as independent sources such as press releases, or news stories based on press releases, or anything published by the subject itself or an affiliate of the subject. Strictly local coverage is also not preferred. Regional or national newspapers or magazines, books published by mainstream publishers (not self-published), or scholarly journals are usually good. So are online equivalents of these. (Additional sources may verify particular statements but not discuss the subject in detail. But those significant detailed sources are needed first.)
  • Fifth, use the article wizard to create a draft under the articles for creation project. This is always a good idea for an inexperienced editor, but in the case of an editor with a conflict of interest it is essential.
  • Sixth, use the sources gathered before (and other sources you may find along the way) to write the article. Cite all significant statements to sources. Do not express opinions or judgements, unless they are explicitly attributed to named people or entities, preferably in a direct quotation, and cited to a source. Do not use puffery or marketing-speak. Provide page numbers, dates, authors and titles for sources to the extent these are available. A title is always needed. Submit the draft when you think it is ready for review. Be prepared to wait a while for a review (several weeks or more).
  • Seventh, when (well perhaps if) your draft is declined, pay attention to the comments of the reviewer, and correct the draft and resubmit it. During this whole process, if you face any unresolvable editing hurdles, or cannot comprehend any editing issue, feel free to post a request at the Teahouse or the help desk and ask the regulars. Repeat this until the draft passes review.

Congratulations, you have now created a valid Wikipedia article. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

12:41:50, 19 October 2020 review of draft by BettyKongEdit

Hi, I am Betty. I would like to see if this article now is up to standard. Most of the references are in Cantonese or Chinese and we believe due to the nature of the subject it should have an English page.

Please let me know what could help to improve the article.


BettyKong (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

BettyKong, If you want a review, please submit the article. Snowycats (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

15:57:44, 19 October 2020 review of submission by AthousanddaysbeforeEdit

Thanks so much for your assistance, Snowycats. I removed the header that was mistakenly placed near the bottom of the article.

Athousanddaysbefore (talk) 15:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

16:40:39, 19 October 2020 review of draft by Chouhan777Edit

Hello , I would like to add the Bio data of a scientist Known to me who is working Indian film and television industry. Please let me know the process of Successfully Adding such profiles. Thanks In Advance

sanju (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Chouhan777 Please understand that Wikipedia does not have "profiles", not one. Wikipedia has articles. You've been given comments about your draft; please heed them, and if you have questions, please ask by editing this existing section. 331dot (talk) 16:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
You should also review the autobiography policy; Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. 331dot (talk) 16:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

20:28:27, 19 October 2020 review of submission by Excel23Edit

The article on Western Telematic was previously not sufficient as it was poorly made. However, upon further inspection of the company, its products and overall history I have determined that it is worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. I have reworked the entire article so that it is better sufficient to meet Wikipedia standards.

Excel23 (talk) 20:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Excel23, Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,763 pending submissions waiting for review. Snowycats (talk) 03:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

21:25:46, 19 October 2020 review of draft by Ishanshah012Edit

Hello! I am requesting help for my draft "Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine". This Wikipedia page is for an emergency medicine journal. It is affiliated with another journal, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (WestJEM), which has its own published Wikipedia page. I followed a similar format to that of WestJEM's and other medical journals, but the draft has not been accepted. What else can I add/change to the draft. Thank you so much, I really appreciate the help! Ishanshah012 (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Ishanshah012, "Inadequate attempt has been made to address previous advice". Read the advice from the previous reviewers, make changes, and then re-submit after those changes have been completed. Snowycats (talk) 03:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Snowycats! Thank you for your feedback! I believe I have addressed the previous advice by adding the references under "Abstracting and Indexing". Those references are published journals and journal databases in which Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine journal is included. If this is not enough information, can this article be accepted as a stub? Thank you!Ishanshah012 (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Ishanshah012, I don't believe that WP:WEASEL has been addressed. Snowycats (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Snowycats! I have made those edits and believe have addressed WP:WEASEL. Is this suitable to re-submit? Thank you! Ishanshah012 (talk) 04:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Ishanshah012, You are free to submit an article at any point after you have made substantial changes since the past review(s). =) Snowycats (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Snowycats Thank you so much for your help!! I really appreciate it =) Ishanshah012 (talk) 01:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

22:56:00, 19 October 2020 review of draft by Tabrez123Edit

Tabrez123 (talk) 22:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Tabrez123, It already exists. Please read the comment from the reviewer. Snowycats (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

22:57:19, 19 October 2020 review of submission by Tabrez123Edit

Tabrez123 (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Tabrez123, It already exists. Please read the comment from the reviewer. Snowycats (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

My article has been declinied. please help to get it published.

23:58:53, 19 October 2020 review of submission by 2604:2000:E010:1100:3048:49B9:5798:3217Edit

Zero explanation given for rejection, which doesn't seem cricket.

2604:2000:E010:1100:3048:49B9:5798:3217 (talk) 23:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Spike 'em, could you provide clarification on this one? Snowycats (talk) 03:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Not sure what happened here, as I definitely typed out my decline reasons, which were: He is a cricketer who fails WP:NCRIC (his only listed appearances on Cricinfo are in 6-a-side games) and the references added seem to be WP:ROUTINE coverage of cricket matches. Spike 'em (talk) 06:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
p.s. another discussion about this: WT:CRIC#Help?. Spike 'em (talk) 06:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
p.p.s. Have added decline reasoning to draft. Spike 'em (talk) 08:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

October 20Edit

00:43:42, 20 October 2020 review of submission by FutureEnterprisesEdit

I am trying to find the balance between the suggestion to not brag too much or make it sound like an advertisement, with also showing Davey Miller's importance to the surfing world. I wonder if someone familiar with the surfing world of the 80s and 90s might be found to review it and help me word it to match what would fit Wikipedia? It is my first time. Many of Davey Miller's contemporaries that he has actually ranked higher than and had shorter surfing careers have Wikipedia pages. He is sort of a top quarterback that made some amazing records that those in football world admire and respect, but he didn't ever win the superbowl. He is respected by the surfers in that he was after "some good surf" more than being the highest champion. Many of the surfers who tried some of the stunts he has done died, etc. I am waiting for the archives of the surfing magazines to get back to me. He was in the cover and had articles about him at least seven times that he remembers. I could show the covers, they are on his Facebook and Instagra, but we want to verify we have the rights to share them in the Wiki Commons system. When Davey Miller walks on a beach in California and Hawaii people still come up to praise him and tell him how amazing he is, so he is well known and has some "minor fame". His art is starting to become "a thing" in the art world, so I and many others think he is fitting of a Wikipedia article. Maybe we have to wait until the archives of the surfing magazines return our emails (if they have anyone employed to do that). Help and guidance and ideas on how to include or use the magazine covers with possible "rights" issues would be appreciated. If those covers would help establish he is worthy of a Wikipedia article. I see Alex Frey and other people I know have one and Davey Miller is just as famous, if not more. FutureEnterprises (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Literally none of the claims your draft makes is cited to a credible secondary source, and it's due to that that your draft is getting declined. The citation requirement is not optional. The draft itself also reads like it's promoting him, which is not acceptable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 00:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

03:48:55, 20 October 2020 review of draft by (talk) 03:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

A detailed comment was left... Hi, the article needs references to significant independent WP:Reliable sources such as newspapers, magazines, reliable websites, books. At least two good references are needed. Snowycats (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

why denied the sources are from her self directly and are real legit sources I am wondering why keep denied? If anything could be added to help be accepted please let know

WP:SELFCITE resp. WP:SELFPUB and WP:BLP. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:17, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

04:10:55, 20 October 2020 review of submission by RbshadowEdit

This college is a well known college in Bangladesh. Here this article is not written to do advertising. People around Bangladesh search this college and didn't found much information about it. People seeking reliable information sources like Wikipedia. So for this purpose the article is created. Thanks (talk) 04:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Rbshadow, It is written like an ad. Read this: WP:NPOV Snowycats (talk) 04:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

06:41:34, 20 October 2020 review of draft by ErvikasbhargavaEdit

Greetings, I need help just finishing this article up. The previous Article was created by another user and it was declined by the reviewer. I have edited the existing draft with some more notable references Including those of Lootcase, TVF Tripling, ad films, movie details, personal life[1]. The comment by the first Wikipedia reviewer was based on the first submitted draft by the other user. Yesterday when I submitted the article again, it got declined. The response was "The rejection said that it could be discussed before resubmission". I would greatly appreciate it if you kindly give me some feedback on this article and review this article. Thanks

Ervikasbhargava (talk) 06:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. You still have claims in the article which require cites to credible secondary sources. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 14:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


  1. ^ "'Comedy is going to be a big part of my life: 'Lootcase' director Rajesh Krishnan". Theweek. 1 August 2020. Retrieved 2 August 2020.

07:00:32, 20 October 2020 review of draft by GodbillywillyEdit

My wiki article has met the criteria for speedy deletion. However I have already fixed it. May I know how to get rid of the notice box?

Godbillywilly (talk) 07:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Godbillywilly, Your article has been deleted as it was clearly an advertisement. Snowycats (talk) 18:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

11:14:05, 20 October 2020 review of draft by P4muzEdit

Tried adding tags to the article for a speedy review but would not accept it as they said there is no draft title to that name :( I'm editing "Tutoroo" to add tags "Language", "Education", and "Companies"

Thank you!

P4muz (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@P4muz: I have added them for you. Note that the Inputbox on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Add_WikiProject_tags expects the drafts title including the "Draft:"-Prefix, so "Draft:Tutoroo" in this case. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


Why may drafts not improved be deleted after six months? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Becuase Wikipedia is not a webhost for material found unsiutable for the encyclopedia. If one of the drafts edited by you have been deleted due to that, please go over to WP:REFUND/G13. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

14:39:08, 20 October 2020 review of draft by Bryan103AEdit

Hi, may I check what is lacking on this page in order to have it published? I have tried multiple times to edit and add information but it seems to be declined all the time. I will appreciate some clarity and guidance on the matter. Thanks!

Bryan103A (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Bryan103A, If you want a review and you have made significant changes since your last submission, you can submit it for review. Reviews are not completed in any particular order and we have a large backlog at the moment. Snowycats (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

14:51:57, 20 October 2020 review of draft by DanishomEdit


I am new to Wikipedia. I created an article about Prof. Shabtay Dikstein, a globally recognized scientist, innovator, scientific author, founder of the Unit of Cell Pharmacology at the Hebrew University Hadassah medical school, founder of international committees and magazines, with multiple medical drugs on the market, and on and on.

When I submitted the draft (I think; working with Wiki is quite unintuitive :( ), I received a bunch of comments (not from a reviewer) on unverifiable sources, and the fact that he was still alive, and so on. I tried to understand how can I verify biographical events of his childhood in Fascist, then Communist Hungary, but received no reply.

The 90 year old Prof. is now suffering from cancer and I don't know how much longer he will live. I was hoping to present to him the Wiki article before he is gone, but I don't know what to do now. I was so frustrated by the process that I abandoned it for many months. Now, that the prof is somewhat recovered from the cancer therapy, I hope that I can complete the process.

Please help me out Thank you Dani Danishom (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. I sympathise, but even if he were to perish at this very moment you would still be obligated to have a credible secondary source for every single claim the article makes, as our biographical requirements apply to recent decedants as well. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 15:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

15:47:08, 20 October 2020 review of submission by LewjonEdit

I do not understand why the page does not respect the aim of a publication. I tried to follow as much as possible the structure of every software developer, from Autodesk to Graphisoft. I added references, removed them when it was said that it was too commercial. I just want to add a piece of information about this software developer that is well known in the BIM industry and deserves to be part of the free encyclopedia, not ot mention that it is the most successful software developer in Italy in the AEC sector. How am I supposed to do so? Lewjon (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Lewjon, This is clearly an advertisement and you did not make substantial changes from prior declines, leading to the rejection. Snowycats (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi :Snowycats, thanks for prompt reply. I don't know whether you are rerferring to my very last edit, but if you read the whole article, as I had submitted it at the beginning, you will notice a huge difference. Hence my request for advice and my suggestion of comparison with What does sound like an advertisement? I described the field of interest, I gave info on the company's history...what kind of information am I supposed to supply? I have applied further modifications and added more reference to show that this company deserves to be part of Wikipedia. The issue I have now is that I don't know where to submit it again. Is it something I can still do? Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewjon (talkcontribs) 13:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

16:19:28, 20 October 2020 review of submission by THE STORY TELLER INDIA KIDSEdit

THE STORY TELLER INDIA KIDS (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. We are not a creative writing site, we are an encyclopaedia. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 16:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

16:49:32, 20 October 2020 review of submission by AthousanddaysbeforeEdit

I'd like to request a review of notability. There was a previous reviewer who rejected the article, but then decided that the subject matter being written about and awarded by the Austin Chronicle did in fact give suitable notability. Athousanddaysbefore (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Athousanddaysbefore, You have not made any meaningful edits since the previous revision. The article was rejected because of the minuscule edits that were made between previous declines. Do you have additional sources you can contribute? Snowycats (talk) 18:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

18:05:16, 20 October 2020 review of draft by OyindebrahEdit

I am currently writing this page and a reviewer says it is not in an encyclopedia tone.

I would like someone to review and give me specific feedback on changing the tone. Thank you

I actually used Total as a guide to write this and that is why I am confused

Oyindebrah (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Oyindebrah, If you want a review and you have made significant changes since your last submission, you can submit it for review. Reviews are not completed in any particular order and we have a large backlog at the moment. Snowycats (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 19:01:19, 20 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Robert AdamskiEdit

Robert Adamski (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Robert Adamski, You did not ask a question. Snowycats (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

19:08:07, 20 October 2020 review of submission by Djb2183Edit

Djb2183 (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

I changed some of the sourcing. I believe the subject is notable enough for Wikipedia, and the article is in no way an advertisement Djb2183 (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Djb2183, There are many other submissions pending. Please wait for a review. Snowycats (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Snowycats, Ok, many thanks! Djb2183 (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

19:52:30, 20 October 2020 review of submission by HarveyYazEdit

I have been earnestly trying to prepare an entry for Dr. Boris Berenfeld. In response to feedback, I have made many changes. Yet, I'm told the entry still doesn't conform to Wikipedia's guidelines. I very much would like some concrete feedback as to how I can edit the entry so it will be approved and published. Please, can I get some assistance? Thank you.

HarveyYaz (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Harvey Yaz The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It reads as a PR piece. Do you have an association with this person? 331dot (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

20:39:38, 20 October 2020 review of submission by Mikey Corey GoodwinEdit

Mikey Corey Goodwin (talk) 20:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Mikey Corey Goodwin Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. 331dot (talk) 20:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

October 21Edit

04:20:05, 21 October 2020 review of draft by AidsporedEdit

Hi there, can someone help me understand why this article was rejected. Trying to understand the reason & fix the issues. I'm kinda new here so any advice is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Aidspored (talk) 04:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Aidspored, Review WP:NACTOR. Snowycats (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 11:02:03, 21 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by AmirnofitEdit

I received a rejection of "Michal Alberstein" and revised according to the general comments - not enough citations and not a neutral tone. I changed the tone and structure and added numerous citations (over 41 citations from journals and websites), and it was rejected again with the same general comments. I would be grateful for more specific advice on how to fit the text to Wikipedia. Many thanks, Nofit Amir

Amirnofit (talk) 11:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Of those 41 citations, which three speak about Michal Alberstein, her life, her career, etc. in great detail? In order for an article subject to be considered notable by the Wikipedia community, we require that an article subject receive significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. This means that for any article subject, we should expect to find multiple sources that are interested enough in Alberstein to have written detailed content about her personally, with little to no participation by her (i.e. not an interview, not a press release, not content written by her or by those close to her.) Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

12:00:46, 21 October 2020 review of submission by (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

12:02:23, 21 October 2020 review of draft by NairjiEdit

The article created for Sarva Yoga which is now at Draft:Sarva Yoga, was moved because of inadequate citations. There has been decent press coverage, directly of the subject as well as independently which was included as citations.

Would require help in improving the citations and to publish for review.

Kindly guide and help.

Nairji (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

13:12:29, 21 October 2020 review of draft by IcleepEdit

Hi, I have written a draft biographical article for a British technologist called Kavita Kapoor. It is located in my sandbox at I would like help on optimizing its layout, tags and title to assist the draft review process.

Icleep (talk) 13:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

15:47:09, 21 October 2020 review of draft by Kingsl1.0Edit

The drop down arrow and the tab is not working for the subtopic "Early life" in this article. Can anyone please help me to fix it?

Kingsl1.0 (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Your draft has more existential issues than that - a lot of claims in it are unsourced. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 16:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

15:53:39, 21 October 2020 review of submission by 125apsEdit

This is my first submission of a new page, and I need assistance with publishing images while I am a copyright holder of all of them. 125aps (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@125aps: Hi, I just left a message on your talk page. If I'm not mistaken, you are the subject of the article? And it looks like you have submitted copyright statements for all 5 images you uploaded. Thanks for doing that. The following images, your paintings, should be fine:
The 2016 photograph might be an issue since copyright usually belongs to the photographer, not the subject shown in the photo:
I've cleaned up the image description files and added the {{OTRS pending}} tag. Oh, and please be careful using the {{ }} brackets. They only work with preexisting templates. If you type words in them, they won't show the way you want. Hope that helps Ytoyoda (talk) 16:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

16:27:10, 21 October 2020 review of submission by Sudhindra AthreyaEdit

I had added more details to the article. Please review.

Sudhindra Athreya (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. You have no sources, and none of the external links in the article can be used as sources. Have newspapers, news magazines, and/or industrial journals written about him in some depth? —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 16:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Sudhindra Athreya, since you are obviously related to this kid, you may lack the objectivity required to edit in this subject area, as you have a clear conflict of interest. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a social network site, nor is it a place to build monuments for people or pedestalise people. We care about notable people, and notability is established when you can demonstrate that multiple reliable independent sources have written about the subject in depth, without any provocation or participation from the subject or their relatives i.e. no interviews or press releases. I'm sure you can understand that winning "first place in cute participants" in a "fancy dress competition" would not make someone deserving of an encyclopedia article, nor would playing with LEGOs or singing songs and drawing. These all sound like run-of-the-mill activities for children. If you can demonstrate that the subject meets our general notability guideline, then we can re-address this. Until then, you are strongly discouraged from editing about this person, as your conflict of interest presents a significant ethical concern. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

22:13:08, 21 October 2020 review of submission by EllegriffinEdit

I edited this article to include information as to why an entry on Brandon Fugal is notable. Please re-review. Ellegriffin (talk) 22:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ellegriffin: Interviews cannot be used to demonstrate notability, as we require independent sources, and an interview is dependent on the responses of the interviewee. Please see WP:GNG. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

October 22Edit

Request on 01:31:51, 22 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by MEEM WEAVEREdit

Hi I got a message on my user talk page saying my new draft article needs more reliable sources, can someone on here review it and give more specifics please. I don't know whether to expand with new information but there isn't a lot of information on the band out there and I don't know where else to get info from besides Allmusic. I have always considered Allmusic a pretty reputable site, they have editors there who know music and the other page I cited was written by one of the band members in their biography section on their profile. The page is Draft:Numbs I hope this link works. Thanks in advance

MEEM WEAVER (talk) 01:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

09:11:42, 22 October 2020 review of draft by OficialtowhidEdit

Review these articles --

Oficialtowhid (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Real — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. What is your connexion to the editors who were behind Ashish Chanchlani and Ashish A. Chanchlani? —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 14:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

13:12:30, 22 October 2020 review of submission by Sudhindra AthreyaEdit

Additional details added for the young talent.

Sudhindra Athreya (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. You haven't changed a single thing since the last time I looked at it, and as such it still violates our biographical policies. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 13:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

14:30:44, 22 October 2020 review of submission by PratsmusingsEdit

Please guide me on how to get the page accepted.

Pratsmusings (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Moot as draft is deleted and user has been shown the door. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 14:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

15:32:51, 22 October 2020 review of submission by Leon M-ZackEdit

Leon M-Zack (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Leon M-Zack: It appears that you have (attempted to) write an article about yourself. While autobiographys are not strictly forbidden, they are strongely discouraged. Pleasse be aware that a Wikipedia article about yourself may not nessesarely be desireable. This article does not meet WP:BLP. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 16:16:14, 22 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by LaundryPizza03Edit

It was declined due to NPOV problems; specifically, that it reads like an essay. I need help correcting this; specifically, how should the causes and impacts be summarized neutrally? I'm pretty sure this topic is notable.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

17:00:27, 22 October 2020 review of submission by Maciek XEdit

Hello, my draft was checked and I canceled the categories before publishing how I understand from the comments, is it all, and should I wait now for publishing? Thanks in advance for your feedback!

Maciek X (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Maciek X: Pages in draft namespace dont belong into categories for content space pages. Therefore, a bot has correctly converted the categorisations of the pages into links. It is unnessesary to remove them all together. I will readd them now. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 18:33:28, 22 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by StoptosmellrosesEdit

Dear Reviewer, I made significant changes and resubmitted my draft I was told that it would take 3 months for the second review. Is there a way to get feedback a little sooner? The first review pointed out that I needed reliable sources. I added several sources such as Baidu which is China's Wikipedia. I also added links to people who reviewed the works of the historian I wrote about. All the reviewers I mentioned are Chinese academics who have a solid reputation. All the works are published in reputable journals by reputable publishers. Mr. Guo's works have not yet been translated into English but he has readers in American universities and institutions on China studies. I modeled my draft on a wikipedia article on Mr. Guo's fellow historian in China Any advice to improve my draft is appreciated.

Stoptosmellroses (talk) 18:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 19:34:17, 22 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by LagardetEdit

My draft has been declined several times and since my last changes I did not get any answer. This has been nearly 6 months now. I fear the draft to be moved. Lagardet (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Lagardet: I'm not sure what answer you were looking to get. It looks like here you asked a rhetorical question in the body of your edit summary, which would not allow anybody to respond to you. We usually discuss things on talk pages. I see you've recently resubmitted the draft, so perhaps you'll receive feedback in due time. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

20:35:23, 22 October 2020 review of draft by JimZBrewerEdit

The article Draft: David A. Deitch was declined on Aug. 1 by Editor Eternal Shadow. I understand that there are many articles to review, but it has now been nearly three months since I resubmitted and it has not been re-reviewed. Is there some way I can expedite the process? JimZBrewer (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

21:54:31, 22 October 2020 review of draft by R2T2MEdit

Thank you for providing an avenue for the AfC help desk. I have recently submitted Draft:Air_Squared for review and have received a "reads more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia" rejection. While I understand this is not the place to argue what should or should not be removed before resubmission, I am concerned that there were no details provided in the rejection. Specifically, apart from an external link to Air Squared's website in the Infobox and a link to Air Squared's Youtube channel, 26 of the 27 references meet Wikipedia's range of independent, reliable, published sources. If the concern in notability, other MOXIE partners including Ceramatec, Inc are represented on Wikipedia and I would argue that the commercial space industry should be represented on Wikipedia.

May I ask if the best course of action would be to edit the draft to make it read more like an encyclopedia article regardless of feedback or should I reach out to the user who provided the rejection for further details? Thank you for your time and support, my apologies for being unfamiliar in submitting my first Wikipedia article. R2T2M (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)R2T2M

R2T2M (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

If someone says your draft reads like an ad, it has very little, if anything, to do with the sources and everything with how the article itself is written. Sourcing is where you get your facts, neutrality is how you are supposed to present them. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 22:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

October 23Edit

09:40:12, 23 October 2020 review of draft by Collingwood Supporter3Edit

I need help with my references and citations Can you help? I Collingwood Supporter3 (talk) 09:40, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Collingwood Supporter3: I have attempted to fix them. The most part is done, though I have not suceeded in every case. You may want to look at my Changes before attempting to fix the rest. Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

14:17:16, 23 October 2020 review of submission by Sudhindra AthreyaEdit

I'm not able to upload the correct picture. The one uploaded is partially done and I would like to change it. Please suggest.

Sudhindra Athreya (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Sudhindra Athreya: Please do not write an article about yourself. Its not forbidden, but the count of persons I have seen writing their autobiography sucessfully in a suitable way is zero. Next, if You are affilated with the person depicted in this image, I have another concern: Wikipedia is not a social Network like Facebook or Instagram.
I am not able to read deleted pages and therefore can't give you advice on Draft:Samarth_Athreya, but its extremely unlikely that this topic meets WP:BLP, let alone WP:NPERSON. The former is especially important when writing about minors. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
It has beed rejected again, the topic is not notable. Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

16:47:22, 23 October 2020 review of submission by BlackbearprEdit

Hi guys im just wondering if you can help me and give me some advice on why my page i wrote about the professional boxer was not accepted? if anything im asking for some help and advice on what i need to add into it to make it acceptable for wikipedia

Blackbearpr (talk) 16:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We do not permit official or shared accounts, nor (as you have found out) do we tolerate mercenary editors who do not explain their circumstances. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 22:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

17:34:18, 23 October 2020 review of submission by OWC12345Edit

My page was declined because of the sources. I have gathered news articles from trade publications as well as local media publications so I am unsure why this information was declined. OWC12345 (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

It comes down to the sourcing. Company profiles (Bloomberg) are not reliable sources. Anything written by Forbes contributors is useless as a source. Press releases (nationalmortgageprofessional) are not reliable sources. Trivial mentions (Union Recorder) are not reliable sources. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 22:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 18:27:28, 23 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by JfritterEdit

Hi there! I don't quite understand why my article for submission has been rejected twice now. It's about a film sound designer named Sean Garnhart, and the reason it was rejected was because it apparently doesn't show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article through published, reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I included sources from credible entities like the Emmys (which he has won one of), Motion Picture Editors Guild, and the British Film Institute. I have seen other pages that have been published using similar award entities as sources - Skip Lievsay and Ren Klyce can be used as examples. I do notice the main difference is that those pages have references to sources from the Oscars - but my question would be: does a sound designer really need to have been nominated for an Oscar to be qualified to have a Wikipedia page? In my opinion, that should not be the only metric that would make a sound designer credible/notable. The Emmys are a similarly large award, as are awards from the Motion Picture Editors Guild and BFI.

I would really appreciate any and all guidance here, and thank you in advance!Jfritter (talk) 18:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Jfritter (talk) 18:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft has NOT been rejected twice, it has been declined, there is a subtle difference, being declined means there is hope that it can be accepted. you need to find some independent reliable sources, the two sources you have at the moment are not independent. Theroadislong (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
I appreciate the prompt reply and the clarification of terminology! I don't quite understand how the Emmys and BFI aren't independent resources, though, especially since the Oscars are considered independent. I would consider the Emmys and BFI to be "news media", which would qualify them as independent sources according to this page. Would it be possible for you to explain to me what prevents these sources from being considered independent?Jfritter (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

19:12:51, 23 October 2020 review of submission by Chukwu3buka01Edit

Chukwu3buka01 (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Why is my article disallowed?

My references are legit. You can visit the pages to confirm the authenticity.

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Inline citations are expected to be in the text proper, used to verify claims the article makes. Search results are not acceptable sources. Trivial mentions (name-drops and sound bites) are not acceptable sources. Two of your sources 404 out. Three of your sources (would be four if one of them weren't a 404) are the exact same article, which makes all but one of those useless and implies a press release. Your sources are, frankly, not up to par. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 22:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 20:53:50, 23 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Khadar shahEdit

Khadar shah (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Khadar shah You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

October 24Edit

12:46:20, 24 October 2020 review of submission by 许木23Edit

 Chinese VC Yunqi Partners targets to raise $275m for third fund

许木23 (talk) 12:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@许木23: What is your question? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

13:00:01, 24 October 2020 review of draft by 许木23Edit

significant?he was included in Forbes’ China Midas 100 list in 2017, 2018and 2019。and  the subject in

许木23 (talk) 13:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@许木23: The decline notice says that you need to demonstrate that the subject has received "significant coverage". If you read our general notability guidelines, they will explain what "significant coverage" means. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

19:20:00, 24 October 2020 review of draft by MagitroopaEdit

Would there be a way of getting this draft merged or deleted altogether? I'm never the best with where/how to request things for deletion/merge. Seems like Mcnickleguy57 created it on October 18, and it was later moved to draftspace. There is already a draft at Draft:Santiago of the Seas that has been around since July, so I see no reason for this second draft to exist. Magitroopa (talk) 19:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 00:08:40, 25 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Bhumi2tandonEdit

Bhumi2tandon (talk) 00:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Respected sir My article was vindictively and maliciously declined by a reviewer.

Please go through my coversation below with the previous reviewer and you will understand why I was in no position to fix the problem.

Copy of my conversation:-

"Please see a copy of my conversation with him below.

"The POV forks have already been fixed please check. Actually this is my first wiki page submission so I guess every place has its own style and language in which content is required to be written. Be it newspaper or websites :))

You cannot "fix" it. The whole thing is a POV fork. The answer was "no", and will remain "no" no matter how many times you repeat the question. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

You are entitled to your opinion and I respect that but a gentler tone would be appreciated. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 14:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Mr Seraphimblade At 14:20 I objected to a high toned message from you and requested you to use a gentler tone and within 20 minutes of my message you went ahead and declined my draft page submission and arbitrarily closed a discussion that was posted on the page with respect to the merger of the page which was started today morning only and in which only you had given your opinion so far. The page was supposed to remain open for atleast seven days as per guidelines. I find this act on your behalf highly vindictive and prejudiced. Let me remind you that while Wikipedia grants some discretionary powers such vindictive acts are not covered by that.

Had you deleted my page the first time you went through it and thought it to be a POV fork I would not have objected but the action was done within 20 minutes of my submitting a message respectfully objecting to you high toned message this is clearly a vindictive act and highly objectionable behaviour for a place like wikipedia. Let me remind you no one not even you OWN the Wikipedia and small editors like us are the reason the Wikipedia exists. I would really appreciate if you stay away from the draft page now."

How can I fix the reason for decline when the page was declined vindictively and arbitrarily after removing a discussion posted in the group with respect to its merger that had been opened in morning only and in which only the reviewer had given his opinion so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 00:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)