Open main menu

Contents

Happy New Year!Edit

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!Edit

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
Wow, thanks to you both, that is massive. :) LOL BOZ (talk) 19:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject BrandsEdit

Hello, BOZ.

You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. North America1000 20:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Isle of the DeadEdit

You have clearly noticed that I have been working on the Isle of the Dead article. By any chance do you have any information on the game like its instruction manual? Been trying to get it to at least GA status but hitting a wall. GamerPro64 02:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi! :) Yes, I have notices your work on improving it, so thanks and good work! No, unfortunately I don't have anything like that. In case it helps, it looks like there is one more review for the game in German, in PC Joker per Mobygames: https://www.mobygames.com/game/dos/isle-of-the-dead/mobyrank BOZ (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Page moveEdit

I am requesting a history page move for obvious technical titular reasons: SP//dr to Peni Parker. Jhenderson 777 21:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

I tried to do the move, but it gave me an error message. You will probably have to file a request Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. BOZ (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Is there some way an administrator is to fix the technical error either if the title is the title or redirection? It is the proper name but this shouldn’t be linked on the talk page. I know slashes should be avoided usually. But it’s part of the name this time around. Jhenderson 777 03:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
To be honest, that is beyond my technical knowledge. But it's probably as good of a reason as any to find someone who knows how to move the page. BOZ (talk) 12:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sise-Neg for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sise-Neg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sise-Neg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 09:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

UserficationEdit

Hey, I recently had my first article deleted. I'm trying to improve it so would you be able to provide me with a copy of the deleted article for use as a draft? Thanks, MLKinsella (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Which article are you referring to? BOZ (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Oh sorry, it was 'Buyagift'. Thanks MLKinsella (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I undeleted the draft for you, but please do keep in mind the discussions on your user talk page, or someone else may delete it again. BOZ (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Yeah I've been talking with a couple users who've been giving me advice. Thanks for your time MLKinsella (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Centurion (comics) listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Centurion (comics). Since you had some involvement with the Centurion (comics) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Spoilsport listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spoilsport. Since you had some involvement with the Spoilsport redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Killer Moff (talk) 06:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Help in moving a Virtual Boy pageEdit

Hi man! Sorry if i haven't been able to help you a lot in the articles you've created but i'm still with the issue of not having internet on my household. I need help from you to move this article from Bound High! (video game) to Bound High!. Take care pal! Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Oh, wow! No worries, you can help out whenever you are able. :) You take care too! BOZ (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Spider-Man's powers and equipmentEdit

Hi BOZ. You protected this draft back in January because of IP disruption, The PP has run out and the IP (or IPs) is back at it again. Not sure if a new PP request is needed, but I'd thought I ask you first. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Yep, I think so. Let's try a longer protection this time. BOZ (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
It's been in the AFC review queue. Do you think it's ready to publish or not really? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
I think it's still a work in progress. BOZ (talk) 18:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

SPA going after RPG creatorEdit

Hey! I wanted to bring this to your attention. Looks like we have a Single Purpose Account going after the Sean Patrick Fannon page. Dealt with them a little last year now they are back and put the page up for deletion. Looking into it a bit myself. Web Warlock (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Hahaha. So is there any way you can bring some order to this chaos?[1]. LamdaKnight is now making a claim that I am Sean. Thanks! Web Warlock (talk) 21:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I know your real name, but I'm not going to out you. :) I see on that FB thread that Jamie Chambers and Jess Heinig dared him to delete their Wiki bios... which, he went and did, just to prove a WP:POINT that he is not an SPA. :) Is this guy retaliating for the Zak Smith AFD like that FB thread seems to suggest? BOZ (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, that and he has a personal thing against Sean Patrick Fannon. Pretty much the definition of CoI I think. Web Warlock (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Frustrating that someone has created an account for the purpose of vandalizing wiki via spurious deletions. Ceronomus (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jamie ChambersEdit

 

The article Jamie Chambers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks significant information and is poorly sourced. Person likely does not meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LambdaKnight (talk) 00:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KorrekEdit

The consensus was to not redirect. Please revert your edit. czar 05:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

The consensus was against redirecting the existing content and edit history to another article (rather than deleting those), but there was no comment on whether we should not have a free-standing redirect at all (at least, I am not aware that AFD as a process can mandate that no redirect should ever exist when the non-notable content has been deleted). But if you feel strongly that I am interpreting this idea incorrectly in this case, I will delete the redirect until I can come up with a better idea of how to implement such a redirect. BOZ (talk) 05:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Knights, Fighters, and Men-at-Arms for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knights, Fighters, and Men-at-Arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights, Fighters, and Men-at-Arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of The Journal of Tékumel Affairs for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Journal of Tékumel Affairs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journal of Tékumel Affairs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Notability of your creationsEdit

Hi, it looks as if too many of your article creations are for subjects with extremely limited notability. I have redirected a few and nomineted two for deletion, but it seems that there are many other similar ones. A review (certainly a capsule review) in Space Gamer is not sufficient to establish notability at all (and in some cases wasn't even an independent source, reveiwing stuff from their own company), and in many cases no other indepth sources fo some reliability could be found (e.g. for The Journal of Tékumel Affairs there is a passing mention in the 1984 "Fantasy Review", a fanzine, and then some mentions on game fora and wikis). Please don't create further articles on such things unless there are much better sources. Fram (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough, I will take an extended break from working with The Space Gamer. BOZ (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Three Worlds (Texas Miniatures) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three Worlds (Texas Miniatures) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Worlds (Texas Miniatures) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Unitrays for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unitrays is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitrays until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1984 Origins Award winnersEdit

Hello, BOZ,

Thanks for creating 1984 Origins Award winners! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

vandalism by an admin?Edit

seems | an admin may be | vandalizing articles as the redirects made from existing articles left other articles pointing to | limbo with no reasoning or fixing other pages? and no votes or anything from the wikipedia community itself. shadzar-talk 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Well, in my experience with that user, they are pretty strict on the notability guidelines. Also in my experience in general, there are often more people who will support a delete/redirect/merge of a fictional character or element where independent sourcing is thin or non-existent in the article, than people who are willing to support that it be kept as an article. Not saying they are right, just that they are common. You can try restoring the articles if you want, but I would expect a good likelihood that they will be taken to AFD, and that unless people can come up with better sourcing, the result will not be good. Sad, but that seems to be the way the community works nowadays. That said, if you have anything halfway decent to act as a source, I say restore and add it, and then see what happens. BOZ (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
sadly i have nothing to add, just disheartened when i went to look up this controversial character only to have its information recently removed except for in the history. not the first article to be "attacked" recently because of a controversy around it subject matter. shadzar-talk 03:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
I know the feeling, believe me. Talos the Untamed was recently forced into a merge even though he was a major character in a film about to be released. :( Still, I believe that characters like that will eventually be shown to be notable and will need to be split back out, we just have to find proof to silence the naysayers. BOZ (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

The Infinity Gauntlet at FACEdit

Hey BOZ,

If you have time, would you mind to add some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Infinity Gauntlet/archive2? The nomination is in danger of stalling, and I don't really want to go through the process a third time. Thanks, Argento Surfer (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Oh wow, did not know it closed incomplete last time. I'm not sure that I would have much more to add of substance, other than to give moral support like last time. Didn't help then either. But, I would love to see it, especially given that Endgame part 2 will be in theaters in the very near future! :) BOZ (talk) 23:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence

Thank you for all your service to WP:APPLE. I meant to include you in the recent mass messaging but here it is. So please check my new Welcome message and see what you think, and let me know if you think there should be an Apple II task force. I don't know what other active admins we have in WP:APPLE, but that would be gr8. I also invited Dgpop, and I'm super esteemed in your collaboration with him as per his Talk page. We definitely need an Apple II barnstar! — Smuckola(talk) 09:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey, thank you, no problem! :) I'm happy to help out where I can! I am on a bit of a sabbatical from working on Space Gamer, where the majority of my work with old Apple games is coming from, but I hope to be back on that before long! BOZ (talk) 11:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Help in renaming image files, articles and categoriesEdit

Hi! Sorry for bothering you about this subject once again but I need your help, as i don't have the ability to rename files: File:NEOGEO Fatal Fury - King of Fighters (Garō Densetsu Shukumei no Tatakai).png => NEOGEO Fatal Fury - King of Fighters (Garō Densetsu - Shukumei no Tatakai)

No problem, how was that? :) I don't mind, but if you could help me out with sourcing on those Japanese games, I would appreciate it! I will try to pick out a few more today, but I am going to be busy for a bit fixing NGen on all those templates. BOZ (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ: Thanks man! I need more from you and this time is about renaming these categories:
  • Category:MidNite Entertainment Group games => Category:MidNite Software games
  • Category:Games published by Bossa Studios => Category:Bossa Studios games
  • Category:Software Creations (UK) games => Category:Software Creations games
Thanks as always and i'll make sure to check you the titles you've listed me ;) Roberth Martinez (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Sounds good, I hope I did that right! I'm a little less certain on how moving categories works. BOZ (talk) 11:48, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks like always man! Here's a suggestion: Can you try to convert this into a full article? I'll try to find references for it...List of Sailor Moon video games#Pretty Soldier Sailor Moon (arcade game) 1995 (the Sailor Moon arcade title) Roberth Martinez (talk) 06:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
If I can find anything, I will add it! BOZ (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Done! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Soldier_Sailor_Moon_(arcade_game) Roberth Martinez (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ: I got you two files that you need to rename man ;) : File:Lynx BattleWheels.png => LYNX BattleWheels.png & File:Lynx Gates of Zendocon.png => LYNX Gates of Zendocon.png Roberth Martinez (talk) 20:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ: I got you one file to rename: File:SNES Magical Pop'n.png => File:SFC Magical Pop'n.png Roberth Martinez (talk) 01:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
You got it! Got anything more for me at User talk:KGRAMR#Japanese games? :) If you have looked at all of them, I can find more. BOZ (talk) 13:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:I'll try to catch up with the stuff you listed me soon enough! Here's another one: File:ARC Grind Stormer.png => File:ARC Grind Stormer (V-V).png Roberth Martinez (talk) 03:40, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Hi! I hope you're doing well. I got you another file that needs to be renamed: File:NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon, -Matrimelee-).png => File:NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon -Matrimelee-).png Roberth Martinez (talk) 03:04, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I wasn't able to move it to that exact name. BOZ (talk) 03:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Try with this one then: File:NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon, -Matrimelee-).png => File:NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon - Matrimelee).png Roberth Martinez (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Hey man! How are you doing? Hey, can you help me in renaming this article i resurrected from the grave? Andro Dunos (video game) => Andro Dunos Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
No problem, I even merged the edit histories in case there is anything there from the prior version that you can use. BOZ (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Awesome! I'll get to the other Japanse games you listed on my talk page, in the meantime, help me in renaming this article from Ganryu (video game) to Ganryu.Roberth Martinez (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
You might want to start a discussion on that one, actually, because Ganryu might be better as a disambiguation page? There is the Tekken character, the swordsman that the redirect currently points to, and the video game, and also the island Ganryū-jima and probably other things. BOZ (talk) 03:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Oh OK, leave it just like that. Then, how about connecting the Spanish and French pages of the game? https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganryu_(Neo-Geo) & https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganryu_(jeu_vid%C3%A9o) Roberth Martinez (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Also, rename the title of the article from Ganryu (Neo Geo game) => Ganryu (video game) Roberth Martinez (talk) 18:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Fixed! BOZ (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:You have one more thing left to do my friend ;): rename the title of the article from Ganryu (Neo Geo game) => Ganryu (video game) and it'll be pretty much done :) Roberth Martinez (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Hey! How're you doing today? I got another file to rename for you :) Windows Skull Caps.png => WIN Skull Caps.png Roberth Martinez (talk) 05:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Hey man! How're you doing? I'll check the remaining Japanese game articles you listed me, as I've busy with other stuff on the website. Here are three image files that need to be renamed: ARC Truxton => ARC Truxton (Tatsujin), ARC Truxton II => ARC Truxton II (Tatsujin Oh) and ARC Kingdom Grand Prix => ARC Kingdom Grand Prix (Shippū Mahō Daisakusen Kingdom-Grandprix). Roberth Martinez (talk) 19:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Hey pal! How's been going? Here is one file that needs to be renamed: NEOGEO Super Sidekicks (Tokuten Oh) => NEOGEO Super Sidekicks (Tokuten Ou).Roberth Martinez (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Here's yet another one for today: NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon - Matrimelee) => NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon -Matrimelee-).Roberth Martinez (talk) 02:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Sorry for bothering you about this again but this file's name should be spelled like this: NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku Tōkon -Matrimelee-) => NEOGEO Matrimelee (Shin Gōketsuji Ichizoku: Tōkon -Matrimelee-). Is there any way to gain rights to move image files...?Roberth Martinez (talk) 07:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
It's not letting me make that move. Apparently admins can grant that ability to users. ;) BOZ (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:I saw the message that poppep up on my feed. Thanks man for helping me in this subject! I owe you a lot... Roberth Martinez (talk) 11:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:Hey man! This is not a file but rather a name (Dogyuun(!!)) that needs to be linked into this article: Dogyuun. Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean? BOZ (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
@BOZ:If you can link this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dogyuun(!!)&redirect=no) to this one (Dogyuun). Just like how you did with Andro Dunos and Ganryu :) Roberth Martinez (talk) 02:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
You mean just change the redirect? Any logged in user can do that if it's not full protected. :) BOZ (talk) 12:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Requesting your opinionEdit

Hi. A conflict has arisen on the Adam Hughes article. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 21:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

BOZ, the matter described above has devolved somewhat. The other editor, 70.112.229.80, has now taken to blanking most of the disputed paragraph in section. Since editors who favor controversial edits are expected to be the ones to begin discussions on them on talk pages, I reverted this, but he then reverted my revert, calling a subsequent edit of mine "vandalism".
On the Adam Hughes talk page, he accused me of "plagiarism" with regard to a paragraph in the Adam Hughes article on a poster Hughes illustrated, and this discussion continued on my talk page. I presented him with several sources that clearly defined plagiarism to be something that was nowhere near anything I had done, but he continues to make the accusation on both talk pages. I started a consensus discussion on one the problems that he has with one of the paragraph's claims (which I invited you to above), but he has now started another discussion requesting that I be blocked for "owning" the page. He has also accused me of "lying" about something he said in an edit summary back in January, when in fact, it was simply an error on my part that I've since acknowledged. He is now also calling for me to be blocked in the first Adam Hughes tp discussion as well.
Your assistance would be appreciated, with the issue of the paragraph blanking, the sourcing issue, and his violations of WP:CIV. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for participating in the discussion on the "blocking" issue. But now he's blanking most of the paragraph entirely, for reasons that as I've described above, are specious. Do you think that warrants a revert by you? Or should I start a second discussion on that? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
A content dispute would probably be better served by a wider discussion. BOZ (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Lois Lane in other mediaEdit

You are invited to join the discussion regarding the split of Lois Lane to Lois Lane in other media. There might be edit conflict on it. Jhenderson 777 13:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!Edit

Wow, thank you! Hard to believe it's been 10 years already! :) BOZ (talk) 14:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

BarnstarEdit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You've been at it for years, but your enthusiasm for creating and sourcing Wikipedia's video game articles never seems to wane! This barnstar is dedicated particularly to your work with Next Generation—your efforts to add every single review the magazine ever gave to its corresponding Wikipedia article, even when that means creating the article from scratch, is inspiring. I know it's inspired me. Thanks for your tireless contributions! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you JimmyBlackwing, I am honored! :) And, I will say, to turn it back to you, I was originally inspired to start this project of doing the Next Generation reviews because I saw you had added some of them to articles I was watching, so you inspired me as well. :) I looked at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Next Generation Magazine page and saw how many redlinks there were under the Game Reviews column (notice there are far fewer such redlinks and bad links now), and how many of the articles had few or no sources or reviews, and I said to myself that we can do better than this. The stubby articles I create may not start off very impressive, but we have to start somewhere don't we? Look at Doctor Hauzer and Burning Soldier as examples of where my stubs and restored articles can go if the right person takes notice! I think I am more than halfway done with the NG page, and there are a bunch of other magazine pages to go through after that, so we will see how long my stamina holds up. ;) BOZ (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Thank you! And I can't wait to watch your NG project continue—the idea that all of its reviews could eventually be sources is insane to me. If this ultimately bleeds into other magazines, that will be amazing. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:39, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Doing my best to make that a reality! :) As daunting as it is, I was considering moving on to CGW next, or possibly in the not too distant future - it may take a couple of years or more to get through it, but that is worth it. :) BOZ (talk) 06:21, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Infobox D&D deityEdit

Just letting you know that the amount of links {{Infobox D&D deity}} had was very small, and I'm pretty sure there were much more when I nominated it. Whatever links were left I added the race and series as you've asked (except for D&D as I couldn't be really sure that all links were actually for that), but I have no idea if whoever did the rest did the same. --Gonnym (talk) 12:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of that! BOZ (talk) 20:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Maniac games:Edit

Maniac is a German gaming mag started in like 93, and they're still around so they decided to upload all their old game reviews to their site under the Klassic Test section. They upload about two per day, and timeline-wise they're up to reviews from 1998. Very valuable resource, as its very easy to access, and they reviewed many games, including obscurities that no modern publication would talk about. They have reviews for obscure systems like Jaguar CD, 3DO, CDi.

Also, some games like Pop'n TwinBee: Rainbow Bell Adventures only came out in Japan and Europe, meaning there's no American coverage at all. And German is super easy to translate to English. Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks for letting me know! Keep up the good work. BOZ (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circularEdit

 
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)Edit

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


Help with iron Man's Armor deletionEdit

  Hey I need your help. It has been suggested that Iron Man's Armor to be deleted and I need your help to prevent that from happening. I'm planning to use Iron Man Armor on Marvel Database, a Marvel Comics wiki to get the citation needed to save the article. I really need your help to prevent this from dying, please I really need you.Penguin7812 (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Deleted redirects responseEdit

Restoring some of the content would be good as they were purged by @Namenamenamenamename: due to how minor some of them are. Especially those who appeared in TV, film, and video games like Kraglin, Karla Faye Gideon, Father Lantom (who was redirected to the page detailing about the characters that appeared in the TV series Daredevil), both versions of Baron Samedi (with the Loa version not being listed prior to the minor character purging), and anyone else I left out while I had to establish a page for Rick Stoner due to him being notable as the first known director of S.H.I.E.L.D. Those that appeared in The Punisher I was able to redirect to the List of Punisher supporting characters page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1988 Origins Award winnersEdit

Hello, BOZ,

Thanks for creating 1988 Origins Award winners! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1987 Origins Award winnersEdit

Hello, BOZ,

Thanks for creating 1987 Origins Award winners! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Adventure BoardEdit

 

Hello, BOZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Adventure Board".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The World BoardEdit

 

Hello, BOZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The World Board".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Memorial DayEdit

--Rtkat3 (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much, and to you too! BOZ (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Building manager redirectEdit

Hi. The building manager redirect to building management is shown to be in all caps because of how it's creator made it. Is there a way for you to retitle it to not being in caps as a favor that I ask of you? --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

I just went ahead and created Building manager as a redirect for you. No problem! BOZ (talk) 22:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Star Fleet Battles Expansion 2Edit

 

The article Star Fleet Battles Expansion 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

all of this material is already included in the main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ericwg (talk) 02:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wizards and LizardsEdit

 

The article Wizards and Lizards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

can't find a page to merge with, nothing seems inherently notable here, seemingly insufficient sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ericwg (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Wizards and Lizards for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wizards and Lizards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizards and Lizards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xanathar's Guide to Everything (June 23)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 10:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 
Hello, BOZ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 10:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Henry (The Walking Dead)Edit

Hello, BOZ,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Henry (The Walking Dead) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry (The Walking Dead) .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Price (July 3)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 13:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of OtherWorld Creations for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OtherWorld Creations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OtherWorld Creations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Evanhop ‎Edit

Couls you please block user:Evanhop. She is clearly not going to stop until she gets blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 16:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Victoriana (role-playing game) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victoriana (role-playing game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoriana (role-playing game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

AFD at Dream Pod 9Edit

Hey, just to clarify, would you prefer that I reopen the discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Dream Pod 9? ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 23:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

I don't see why it would be necessary, but thanks for asking. I think it was a valid close. BOZ (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of P. Nathan Toomey for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Nathan Toomey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Nathan Toomey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Louis Prosperi for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Prosperi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Prosperi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

boldtext at AfDEdit

Hi there,

Not trying to give you a hard time at the Dream Pod 9 AfD. It's just that the boldtext !vote should only come from a person once. You can always add more comments, or even strike a previous !vote to add a new one -- the only thing that's kind of a no-no is repeating a bold !vote. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh, no problem, I will remove that part. BOZ (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lame Mage Productions for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lame Mage Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lame Mage Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 23:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Warning issued was mistakeEdit

Hey, I was just issued a warning from WP:Peachy saying I shouldn't have removed the AfD template on Dream Pod 9. It was removed from when I closed the discussion, but when it was relisted after a DRV discussion, I was warned, though this is a mistake. Are you able to assist with clearing it?

If I am mistaken, and there is a reason that this warning was issued, please correct me. ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

I removed it since it was just a bot warning that was likely mistakenly triggered. BOZ (talk) 03:56, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Impressions Advertising & MarketingEdit

 

The article Impressions Advertising & Marketing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article on a personal consulting firm was previously redirected to List of role-playing game publishers by User:BOZ before being recreated by an IP editor seven days later. It currently has only one source and a basic BEFORE finds no RS to redeem it. The text reproduces, verbatim, text currently found at Aldo Ghiozzi making a merge impossible as there is no content to merge. Article would almost certainly be either deleted or (re-)redirected at AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Aldo Ghiozzi for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldo Ghiozzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldo Ghiozzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Help at Lex LuthorEdit

Do you mind helping solve a debate / edit war in Lex Luthor. Thank you! Jhenderson 777 16:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

HelloEdit

I apologize for the trouble, but as I said to the other moderator, I am actually not attempting to change anything, I have only restored the Wikipedia page in support of existing reference citations. The other individual is attempting a radical edit, based on nothing, that is in direct contravention of every single comic book authority- Overstreet, CGC, CBCS, and of course DC comics itself. Which is why the other individual is unable to produce any citation other than something from some guy's site called "mikesamazingworld", which itself, when you click the magnifying glass (the way the other individual suggest I do) specifically states in a disclaimer in the pop up that "publication dates are NOT release dates" (I also notice that Action Comics 23 has a copyright number that is also earlier than Superman 4, further undermining the edit the other individual is attempting to make).

Given that the other individual is attempting to edit 80 years of existing DC canon on Wikipedia with absolutely no citation to support anything close to the content of his attempted to edit, I would hope that the moderators take note that I am not the one who is attempting to "change" anything to advance some odd agenda. I'm simply trying to keep the information consistent with the relevant citations and established comic book canon.

Thank for reaching out.

Regards,

-jaydubp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaydubp (talkcontribs) 19:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

It would have helped if you actually talked about it and also not assumed bad faith IMO.Jhenderson 777 19:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Fair enough. The two of you, and anyone else involved, should come to an agreement on the article's talk page with how to proceed. Thank you. BOZ (talk) 19:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Hopefully but how can you reason with somebody who claims I have an agenda. Hopefully he would just talk. Jhenderson 777 19:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Neverwinter Campaign SettingEdit

Hello, BOZ,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Neverwinter Campaign Setting should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neverwinter Campaign Setting .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Redemption (card game)Edit

Hey Boz, I saw your edit on Redemption and I see a "Legend of the Five Rings" quote on there. Is that a mistake? Leitmotiv (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Probably! I will check it out. BOZ (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Knull etc.Edit

I get that the Penguin user was a sock puppet and everything. But I don’t approve of deleting his material like Knull (comics) etc. Can you possibly bring some of his good faith material back?Jhenderson 777 03:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what happens when you get caught socking... they try to WP:DENY everything you did as much as possible... Well, if you have some specifics that you want me to look at, let me know. I'm not going to restore everything he did, but I will take a look at a few good cases and see if there is something we can still use in good faith. BOZ (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I mostly mean articles he started like Knull (comics) and Absolute Carnage. I kind of want the history back. Jhenderson 777 05:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Checking the deletion history. He created other few articles and image files. Jhenderson 777 05:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm not entirely clear what the ethics are on undeleting that many revisions from a banned user, but you might want to see what they are willing to do at WP:REFUND. If they don't want to undelete those two articles, I will copy and paste the last available versions as a sort of redo from scratch (assuming that is even OK). BOZ (talk) 12:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Asmodeus (Marvel Comics) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asmodeus (Marvel Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asmodeus (Marvel Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 13:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Year of the VillainEdit

Greetings, I need help with this article, please. Do you know someone else to improve this article? F. E. Puricelli (talk) 01:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, my apologies but I don't really know anything about the topic. BOZ (talk) 02:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
OK, if you some people you might, I'd be very grateful. Thank you anyway. F. E. Puricelli (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NFL GameDay 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Official PlayStation Magazine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lizard king (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lizard king (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizard king (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

DC Comics: Sixty Years of the World's Favorite Comic Book HeroesEdit

Thank you for creating this article! It's been a beloved part of my collection since its publication in 1995. I've cited to it here on Wikipedia several times over the years and will try to link to the article in the future.

Mtminchi08 (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Awesome! Glad you like it. :) If you want more text from the magazine review of the book, I will be happy to provide. BOZ (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy Chambers has been acceptedEdit

Andy Chambers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 04:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! BOZ (talk) 12:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Throat leech for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Throat leech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throat leech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Numinus for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Numinus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numinus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Forgotten Realms Interactive AtlasEdit

 

The article Forgotten Realms Interactive Atlas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olympia (comics)Edit

 

The article Olympia (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ISAAC (comics)Edit

 

The article ISAAC (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BehirEdit

 

The article Behir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "BOZ".