Proposed deletion of Araki Yukishige edit

 

The article Araki Yukishige has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long unreferenced article about individual with no available references anywhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Araki Yukishige edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Araki Yukishige requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uberaccount (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yasuda clan edit

 

The article Yasuda clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Historical people. No sources to be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hasegawa Akishige for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hasegawa Akishige is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasegawa Akishige until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DAJF (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Arakawa Nagazane edit

 

The article Arakawa Nagazane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any sources to indicate he is a notable historical person. A single mention in one book doesn't cut WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 13:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bessho Harusada edit

 

The article Bessho Harusada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub with no claim to notability. No sources found indicating a pass of WP:GNG. Just as not every soldier is notable, not every samurai is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 04:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Katsura Tadaakira edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katsura Tadaakira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 22:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Katsura Tadaakira for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katsura Tadaakira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katsura Tadaakira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 15:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chōsokabe Chikatada for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chōsokabe Chikatada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chōsokabe Chikatada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Irida Chikazane edit

 

The article Irida Chikazane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable samurai. Original version was sourced to Samurai Wiki, which is... less than optimal. Even if you follow up with their source ([1]), one source is not enough to maintain an article. The ja.wiki article is unsourced, so nothing valuable there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 22:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kuroda Hidetada edit

 

The article Kuroda Hidetada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable samurai; fails WP:ANYBIO. Original version was sourced to Samurai Wiki, which is... less than optimal. Even if you follow up with their source ([2]), one source is not enough to maintain an article. The ja.wiki article has a single source, but only used to cite the DOB/DOD - no way to know how in-depth the source is as I can't locate an online copy. Either way, not enough when the individual in question doesn't appear to have a significant claim to meeting ANYBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 22:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hyakutake Tomokane edit

 

The article Hyakutake Tomokane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable samurai; fails WP:ANYBIO. Original version was sourced to Samurai Wiki, which is... less than optimal. Even if you follow up with their source ([3]), one source is not enough to maintain an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 21:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Oi Yukiyoshi edit

 

The article Oi Yukiyoshi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable retainer; fails WP:ANYBIO. Original version was sourced to Samurai Wiki, which is... less than optimal. Even if you follow up with their source ([4]), one source is not enough to maintain an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 23:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Okabayashi Shoken edit

 

The article Okabayashi Shoken has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable samurai; fails WP:ANYBIO. Original version was sourced to Samurai Wiki, which is... less than optimal. Even if you follow up with their source, one source is not enough to maintain an article. (Creating user is super-indeffed for a long history of this)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 01:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Shiina clan has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Shiina clan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply