DYK nom edit

I nominated Henry W. Jeffers, an article you created, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on March 29. — Athaenara 18:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  On 5 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry W. Jeffers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Carla Katz edit

This is a great article created for a subject I am astonished did not have oner already, given her frequent press appearances. Keep up the great work! Alansohn (talk) 04:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Helen Meyner.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Helen Meyner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ЭLСОВВОLД talk 17:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC) --ЭLСОВВОLД talk 17:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Walter G. Alexander edit

Hi. I've nominated Walter G. Alexander, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on August 25, where you can improve it if you see fit. –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Walter G. Alexander edit

  On 31 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Walter G. Alexander, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Karl Weidel. edit

Can we take the last sentence back to my wording? The current version seems to a bit too tabloidy for an encyclopedia. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-11t17:53z

Do you have a ref for his birth date, not just the year? -- Jeandré, 2008-10-11t17:55z
I've received an email questioning the McGraw article's accuracy. Do you know of another source for the things referenced to it in the article? -- Jeandré, 2008-10-11t18:12z
What exactly is in dispute? If it's the circumstances of his death, I've added a few extra sources. --Offenbach (talk) 20:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Challenged is age at death: 72, not 73; and from that the entire McGraw article. The Hunterdon article also states 73, and eventho it may just be copying an incorrect age from the earlier McGraw article, it's still a newspaper article which trumps an contradiction in an email. I'm leaving the disputed tag for now, but if within a few days I don't get a source for 72, or a source for a birth date showing it to be 72; anyone can remove it.
"The source should be cited clearly and precisely to enable readers to find the text that supports the article content in question." - wp:v
I've commented out the http://www.ancestry.com/ ref for birth and death dates because I couldn't find any results when searching for
karl weidel
or
karl weidel iii
Also "no matches" searching in "Historical Records" for
Karl
Weidel
Death Year: 1997
USA
New Jersey
Also "no matches" searching in "Historical Records" for
Karl
Weidel
Death Year: 1997
Also "no matches" searching in "Historical Records" for
Karl
Weidel
Also "no matches" searching in "Stories and publications" for
Karl
Weidel
USA
Same problems with Factiva and AP ref.
I've put in direct URLs for the McGourty and Hunterdon sources - it's better than just linking to a search page.
The biggest problem however from the complainer is the mention of suicide. I said that since it's referenced and the notable kind of thing an encyclopedic biography entry should have, it will have to stay. What I'm asking for is the removal of the how and place of the suicide - it's fine for newspapers trying to sell ads, but not for an encyclopedia which is a tertiary source and should have a different tone. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-12t12:15z
I've looked at it again and removed the disputed template. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-12t12:28z
I've restored the reference for birth and death dates. In the footnote I've added the information from the SSDI record, which is available here for Ancestry.com members. --Offenbach (talk) 14:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Invitation edit

 
Please accept this invite to join the Unreferenced Article Cleanup WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to decreasing the number of unreferenced articles on Wikipedia. As of December, 2008 there were over 154,000 unreferenced articles on Wikipedia, we need your help! Simply click here and sign your username to accept!

--Captain-tucker (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

DYK for William Cowper Alexander edit

  On 31 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Cowper Alexander, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 11:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

  The Invisible Barnstar
You're a great and prolific editor who doesn't clamor for attention. Your contributions are outstanding. shirulashem (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

John DiMaio edit

I guess the news regarding Marcia A. Karrow's replacement had not hit North Jersey, and I wanted to thank you for taking the time to create the article for John DiMaio, including updating appropriate templates. Thanks for all of your efforts. Alansohn (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

John Dyneley Prince edit

  Hello! Your submission of John Dyneley Prince at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuddingJournalist 06:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for John Dyneley Prince edit

  On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Dyneley Prince, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

David Friedland and related articles edit

Thanks for cleaning up after me on the David Friedland and other related articles where I had copied some of the same text, along with some of the same errors. My appreciation for all of your efforts on behalf of New Jersey articles, including their creation, revision, updating and vandalism fighting. Alansohn (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for John W. Wescott edit

  On June 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John W. Wescott, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 14:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for William F. Hyland edit

  On June 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William F. Hyland, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

JamieS93 14:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Marion West Higgins edit

  On June 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marion West Higgins, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 02:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

List of Phi Beta Kappa members column formatting edit

I restored the prior column formatting for List of Phi Beta Kappa members because, at least on my computer, your edit resulted in one very, very long list of names running down the left side of the page. I'm by no means an expert on column formatting, and perhaps there's some other way to handle it. Best,--Arxiloxos (talk) 18:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, didn't realize Template:Div col only works in Mozilla browsers. —Offenbach (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK Nom Concern edit

  Hello! Your submission of William Dickey (poet) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for George H. Large edit

  On June 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George H. Large, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 02:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for William Dickey (poet) edit

  On June 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Dickey (poet), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Backslash Forwardslash 20:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kim Guadagno edit

  Hello! Your submission of Kim Guadagno at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SoWhy 09:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Christopher Daggett.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Christopher Daggett.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kim Guadagno edit

  On July 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kim Guadagno, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 20:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Rabbi Levy Izhak Rosenbaum edit

I found the information in the American Jewish journal Forward, in the article Scandal Sparks New Debate Over Specter's Organ Legislation: "While human organs trafficking of the sort allegedly conducted by Rabbi Levy Izhak Rosenbaum is widely condemned". The article was published on 5 August 2009, so I guess if the information was wrong they would have corrected the article. This was on the other hand not mentioned in other articles. --Pylambert (talk) 08:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The coverage of the arrests (such as articles from the AP and the New York Times) said there were five rabbis implicated. The New York Times said the five were Saul J. Kassin, Mordchai Fish, Lavel Schwartz, Eliahu Ben Haim, and Edmund Nahum. Rosenbaum is not called a rabbi in that article or in others that I've read. The Star-Ledger calls him "a self-styled real estate dealer from Brooklyn." Similarly, the criminal complaint against him says he is "a resident of Brooklyn, New York, [who] was purportedly involved in the real estate business." The five rabbis are identified as such in the criminal complaints. —Offenbach (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed English Grammar edit

Dear Hon. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Offenbach,

I am the one who so-called "contributed" the "Sound" part in the article for Disputed English Grammar. You had dismissed it as "no basis" in your reasons for undoing my so-called "contribution".

I don't [pardon my informal written style] know which world you come from, but perhaps one in which people acquired languages by beginning with a study of the rules of grammar as or before they start to speak.

In my world, and in almost every world I know of in this world, people acquire languages by listening or, if you would like, "studying" sounds in speeches. And as such, native-speakers' minds think phonetically when speaking.

All of us in this world except probably yours, and except also some of those who acquired languages as a non-native speaker, tend to employ this form/methodology of language-acquisition, -development, and/or -expansion until the day we pass away.

That is why those who never had any education could seemingly speak well but could not write well. And why I won't be making "any future contributions" [note the clear grammatical error but which just sounds bloody nice to hear and perceive] to this wild worldipedia.

As a mother-tongue speaker of English, as well as being a native-speaker of two other languages (one of which is spoken by approx. 1.3 billion [not including the others who are wandering around the world with other nationalities] of the total population in this world), I have NEVER needed to train my mind, nor strain my mind to consider the rules of grammar when speaking any of those three languages. You could say that I speak as if I am singing a song.

Anyway, I am "user-talking" to you because you had stated that my so-called "contribution" has "no basis".

Perhaps if you'd think harder before making "no basis" comments, I wouldn't have bothered you and about you. Perhaps you have a basis for why people could speak and write so differently.

And perhaps I should end this "user-talking" now.

Good day!

Yours, Prescriptivist

DYK nomination of Lucius Horatio Stockton edit

  Hello! Your submission of Lucius Horatio Stockton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! @Kate (talk) 02:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lucius Horatio Stockton edit

  On November 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lucius Horatio Stockton, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Middle name edit

I will add the source and the document. I think it was from his passport application. Once you find it, it is easy to confirm, you just put the whole thing in quotes in Google and you find it was there all along, hidden. It is frustrating to find, and once known, easy to confirm, You can also put the name back to E. if you want. I prefer making the redirect that way, and if you move it back to E. the redirect is perfectly formed. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

It looks like when you type his full name in quotes into Google you DON'T find him, that's a first. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Abraham Ogden edit

  On November 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Abraham Ogden, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jake Wartenberg 08:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Harry L. Sears edit

  On December 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harry L. Sears, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 11:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Paula Dow edit

Hi. I've nominated Paula Dow, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Accurizer (talk) 10:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Paula Dow edit

DYK nomination of Paula Dow edit

  Hello! Your submission of Paula Dow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Robert C. Janiszewski edit

  On February 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert C. Janiszewski, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Paula Dow edit

  On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paula Dow, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Roslyn M. Brock edit

  On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roslyn Brock, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for James W. Treffinger edit

  On March 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article James W. Treffinger, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Christopher O. Ward edit

  On March 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christopher O. Ward, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Christopher Daggett2.jpg edit

Hi, the OTRS message received in October 2009 was apparently insufficient and no other was added so I nominated the image for deletion for lacking evidence of permission. Regards Hekerui (talk) 00:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ogden H. Hammond edit

Orlady (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Irwin B. Laughlin edit

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled edit

 

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Daniel R. Benson edit

I had intended to create the Daniel R. Benson article for months and just never got around to doing it. Thanks for taking the time to create the one outstanding article among the 120 members of the New Jersey Legislature and thanks for all of your work on New Jersey-related articles. Alansohn (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem... but there were actually two other NJLeg entries outstanding -- Kevin J. Ryan and Patrick Delany. Took care of those too. --Offenbach (talk) 20:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

In recognition of your efforts, I hereby award you... edit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I award you this barnstar in recognition of your determined efforts to create and update articles related to the great state of New Jersey. It's clear that your edits come in bursts, rather than editing every day, but the quality and quantity of your work demonstrates a level of contribution that deserves to be recognized. I'm not one who hands out many barnstars (I've probably handed out a handful in all my years), but the scope and breadth of your contributions, as demonstrated by the substantial number of articles you've created and all those accepted at DYK, shows a level of contribution that could not simply be given a mere "thank you". Please accept this in appreciation for your past work and in the hope that there will be more to come. Alansohn (talk) 23:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey edit

 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Offenbach! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Gregory P. McGuckin. edit

Greetings, Offenbach! Just letting you known that I've nominated Gregory P. McGuckin for DYK. Cheers! :) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Chris A. Brown edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Christopher J. Brown edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination for June 9 Deng Speech edit

Just to let you know that the hook issue that you raised on Template:Did you know nominations/June 9 Deng Speech has now been resolved; please take a look to see if you are happy to approve the nomination now. Prioryman (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Malloch Building DYK edit

Hi, you left a question mark at my DYK entry for Malloch Building. The question mark appears to be stopping its progression to the main page. Can you revisit the DYK review and perhaps give it a different graphic? Binksternet (talk) 03:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Frederick William Danker edit

Thanks for fixing that; I looked for American lexicographers at Category:Lexicographers by nationality, but it wasn't there; I've since corrected that. Dru of Id (talk) 10:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Gregory P. McGuckin edit

  Hello! Your submission of Gregory P. McGuckin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Gregory P. McGuckin edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Alice G. Dewey edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rhonda Coullet edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Fruitvale (film) edit

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 08:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Marilyn Suzanne Miller edit

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 16:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Love and Happiness edit

Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nadine (song) edit

Orlady (talk) 16:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of John Crowley (biotech executive) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Crowley (biotech executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Crowley (biotech executive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 02:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Arthur Kober edit

  Hello! Your submission of Arthur Kober at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 10:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Arthur Kober edit

Harrias talk 00:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dawn Zimmer for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dawn Zimmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Zimmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Great New Jersey biographies, thank you for writing them. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Offenbach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Offenbach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Thomas Puccio edit

On 3 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Puccio, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that US Justice Department attorney Thomas Puccio was the inspiration for characters in the films Prince of the City and American Hustle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Puccio. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Puccio), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 04:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Offenbach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Jon Corzine Good Article Reassessment edit

Jon Corzine, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

De La Soul Is Dead Edit edit

I can send you a pic of the J card from the cassette which I still own, showing my edits as correct. Let me know how I can get you this information, so we can accurately display this historic album's information correctly. Thank you. 172.5.16.234 (talk) 02:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

https://www.discogs.com/release/14643016-De-La-Soul-De-La-Soul-Is-Dead/image/SW1hZ2U6NDM5MjIxMzQ= 172.5.16.234 (talk) 02:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Information at Discogs.com can be edited by anyone who logs in, which means it fails WP:USERG and cannot be used for a citation. You're looking for Template:Cite AV media. Binksternet (talk) 03:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The edit conflict has been resolved, as there were different tracks omitted on the LP and cassette versions of the album. Offenbach (talk) 05:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply