Hello! Feel free to leave a message

Any new messages? Click the orange bar above! Thank you! Please do not vandalise this page. I have backup so there is no point!

ARCHIVES

Please note that

NO NEW MESSAGES

Replaceable fair use File:A Selwyns Coaches Bus operating on a GNW route.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:A Selwyns Coaches Bus operating on a GNW route.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The same thing pretty much also applies to File:A Midland Classic bus in Manchester.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:A Midland Classic bus in Manchester.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:A Midland Classic bus in Manchester.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:A MP Travel bus operating route 41.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:A MP Travel bus operating route 41.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Since this image can also be seen used here prior to it being uploaded to Wikipedia and there’s no indication it’s been released under a CC-by-4.0 license, some sort of more formal verification is going to be needed to verify copyright authorship and consent. There are a couple of ways to do this if you’re the person who took this photo, but the easiest is to probably follow the instructions given above. — Marchjuly (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

2022–23 EFL Cup moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, 2022–23 EFL Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022–23 EFL Cup has been accepted edit

 
2022–23 EFL Cup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 02:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:NationalExpressWestMidlands33.jpg edit

 

The file File:NationalExpressWestMidlands33.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned Image

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:2022–23 FA Cup has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2022–23 FA Cup. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bus Open Data Service has been accepted edit

 
Bus Open Data Service, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 03:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I would like to note that there is some use of primary sources which ideally should be replaced. Gusfriend (talk) 03:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022–23 FA Cup (May 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dudleybus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Dudleybus

Thank you for creating Bustimes.org.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Dudleybus

Thank you for creating 2022 FA Community Shield.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022 edit

  Your edit to Sports Direct has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 18:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am unsure as to what copyrighted material I may have used as the content was taken exactly from the existing content on the Frasers Group page User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 18:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
If the content was taken from another Wikipedia article, you need to provide attribution in the edit summary where you added it (see WP:CWW). At any rate, the sections I removed were verbatim-copies of text from the articles I linked in the edit summary, which were the company's own website and an article in The Guardian, so I'm confident that the originals were copyvio as well. signed, Rosguill talk 18:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Frasers Group edit

Frasers Group is simply a renaming of Sports Direct. There is no need to have two articles on the same company especially if the Sports Direct article is just a copy and paste of the Frasers Group article. Dormskirk (talk) 19:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of PrimeLines (Coventry) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PrimeLines (Coventry) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrimeLines (Coventry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

2006toyotacorrola (talk) 09:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply