User talk:Bharatiya29/Archive1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

Help me!

edit

I want to use WP:Twinkle but I can't find it on the Gadgets list.

Bharatiya29 (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there - if you navigate to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and look at the 'Browsing' section, Twinkle is normally the 13th from the top. Could you confirm again if it is there for you? Samuel Tarling (talk) 10:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
No I can't find it. Bharatiya29 (talk) 11:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Okay. What Operating System are you using, and which Web Browser (and version)? I've just checked - you're not yet Autoconfirmed. Twinkle is only available to autoconfirmed users. To become autoconfirmed, you need to have had your account for four days and made at least 10 edits. Samuel Tarling (talk) 12:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the information! Bharatiya29 (talk) 12:42, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for List of National Democratic Alliance members

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

User rights

edit

Hello, Bharatiya,
I noticed this edit you made. While your enthusiasm is appreciated, as a new editor, you don't have a great deal of experience and shouldn't be passing judgments on other editors' requests for permission. The administrators who watch over WP:PERM are thorough and will check out each applicant themselves before coming to a decision. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 14:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that any policy prohibits a new user from nominating someone else. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Many actions aren't specifically prohibited but are not common Wikipedia practice and nominating another editor for advanced user rights is one of them. Please read over the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requests for permissions for guidance. If you believe this editor would benefit from having this user right, you should go to their user talk page and suggest they apply. Liz Read! Talk! 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the clarification. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhagwanpur,jaunpur

edit

Hello Bharatiya29,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bhagwanpur,jaunpur for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WelshWonderWoman (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Haier T20 Cup 2015-16

edit

Hi. Thanks for your request at WP:RMTR to move the Haier T20 Cup 2015-16 article. While ordinarily I agree it would be a good move to make, in this case I'm going to decline because articles at AfD shouldn't be moved. If the article is kept, which I assume it will be, feel free to nominate the article again at RMTR or drop me a note on my talk page. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sure. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
The AfD is now closed so I think that it will be appropriate move to make. Bharatiya29 (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Looks like Lugnuts has already done it. Jenks24 (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for disturbing you. I didn't noticed that. Bharatiya29 (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 14:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bahujan Republican Ekta Manch
added a link pointing to National Democratic Alliance
Goa Vikas Party
added a link pointing to National Democratic Alliance
Shiv Sangram
added a link pointing to National Democratic Alliance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy Deletion and WP:BITE

edit

Hi there! I very much appreciate your work patrolling new pages. However, I'd like to draw your attention to Wikipedia's policy on biting the newcomers. Tagging a page for deletion moments after creation is considered uncivil and may drive away newcomers whose edits are made in good faith. It's generally a good idea to give a page no less than 10 minutes before tagging unless, of course, it's an attack page or some other sort of vandalism. If I can be of any assistance, you know where to find me. --Non-Dropframe talk 12:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the advice. Can you please tell which page you are talking about? Bharatiya29 (talk) 13:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I believe it was Skapparoneday. The CSD tag was added about 1 minute after the article was created. It's just a bit jarring for a new contributor, if you know what I mean. --Non-Dropframe talk 13:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
The band was actually not notable. It wasn't going to be kept even if the contributor would have expanded it. Anyways I agree with the point you made and will take care in future. Bharatiya29 (talk) 13:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Please don't misunderstand my point. You're absolutely correct about the article. It was never going to be kept and was absolutely a candidate for speedy deletion. It's just not important not to scare off new, well-meaning editors with the hasty addition of speedy deletion tags. Your work patrolling new pages is very much appreciated and keep up the good work! --Non-Dropframe talk 13:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the appreciation. I realized that the point you made is correct. Instant tags might be discouraging for new users. Will take care next time. Bharatiya29 (talk) 14:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:National Democratic Alliance

edit

Hi there, thanks for your work on this template and other Indian topics. Just thought I'd remind you about WP:STRONGNAT as you used American spelling (organization, unrecognized) rather than Indian English (organisation, unrecognised). Thanks AusLondonder (talk) 22:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing it out! Bharatiya29 (talk) 06:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
No worries, thanks for your reply :) AusLondonder (talk) 22:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of 2015 National Games of India medal table

edit

  Hello! Your submission of 2015 National Games of India medal table at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

The specific issue is that the hook needs to focus more on the subject of the article, the medals table. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I've approved the DYK to go live. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Goa Vikas Party

edit

Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Francisco Pacheco (politician)

edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 2015 National Games of India medal table

edit

Thanks for the contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Asian Month is COMING!

edit
 

Hi Bharatiya29 ,

The Wikipedia Asian Month will begin in less than an hours, and once again, thank you for signing up! Let's help the world know more about Asia! Below are a few reminders for you:

  1. Please check out the rules here. Some rules have been adjusted—the most important being that on the English Wikipedia, stubs may be expanded with some limitations.
  2. Do take the time to read the Q&A if you have any questions, or ask on the talk page.
  3. The list of participants has been alphabetized so you can more easily find your name and report your contributions.
  4. There is a template that you can use on your user page. {{Template:User Asian Month‎}}

Enjoy the Wikipedia Asian Month :) --AddisWang (talk)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The DYK nomination of WT1190F

edit

  Hello! Your submission of WT1190F at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —GrammarFascist contribstalk 13:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Imran Khan (web developer)

edit

Hello Bharatiya29,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Imran Khan (web developer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bharatiya29. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/India—Laos relations.
Message added 18:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Human3015TALK  18:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imran Khan (web developer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kota. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for WT1190F

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
9   Pragatisheel Indira Congress (talk)           Add sources
1,764   Indian National Congress (talk) Add sources
278   Rashtriya Janata Dal (talk)       Add sources
139   Indian general election, 2004 (talk)   Add sources
80   Indian general election, 1998 (talk)       Add sources
11   Kerala Congress (Jacob) (talk)         Add sources
10   Dubai Frame (talk)           Cleanup
1,617   Investment banking (talk)   Cleanup
14   Transport in Lebanon (talk)     Cleanup
157   Indian general election, 2009 (talk) Expand
188   Elections in Bihar (talk)   Expand
538   Foreign relations of India (talk) Expand
35   Uttarakhand Kranti Dal (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
5,872   Narendra Modi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
280   L. K. Advani (talk)   Unencyclopaedic
866   BRIC (talk) Merge
8   Alappuzha (Lok Sabha constituency) (talk)           Merge
174   Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (talk)       Merge
35   Opinion polling for the Indian general election, 2014 (talk)   Wikify
1   Tamil Nadu Telugu Makkal Katchi (talk)           Wikify
4   Ramdas Tadas (talk)       Wikify
1   Indian general elections, 2004-Regional Scenarios (talk)     Orphan
34   Altimetrik (talk)         Orphan
1   Tamizhaga Dravida Makkal Katchi (talk)           Orphan
7   Kerala Congress (Secular) (talk)       Stub
6   C. P. Radhakrishnan (talk)           Stub
7   Zoram Nationalist Party (talk)         Stub
8   Kerala Congress (B) (talk)           Stub
60   Rashtriya Lok Dal (talk)         Stub
3   Professionals Party of India (talk)         Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Imran Khan (web developer)

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Asian Month Barnstar
Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 14:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Bharatiya29 06:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Lakhiram Agrawal

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Lakhiram Agrawal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

edit

Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon

edit

Hello,

 

CIS-A2K is going to organize an edit-a-thon between 25 and 31 January this year. The aim of this edit-a-thon is creating and improving Geographical Indications in India related articles.

We welcome all of you to join this edit-a-thon.
Please see the event and add your name as a participant: meta:CIS-A2K/Events/Geographical_Indications_in_India_Edit-a-thon

Feel free to ask if you have question(s).
Regards. --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

edit

DYK for Lakhiram Agrawal

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Anant Dave

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

edit

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

edit

DYK for List of Ranji Trophy triple centuries

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

edit

FLC request

edit

Hi, if interested can you review this candidate? Vensatry (Talk) 09:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

edit

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

edit

Mohanlal filmography

edit

Hai, I have put this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.--Inside the Valley (talk) 12:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

edit

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

edit

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

edit

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

edit

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

edit

May 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Balochistan, Pakistan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Dismisses-Pakistans-RAW-Spy-Claim/2016/03/27/article3348018.ece|accessdate=6 May 2016|work=[[The New Indian Express]|date=27 March 2016}}</ref> On 29 Mar 2016, Lt Gen Asim Saleem Bajwa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

ARBIPA sanctions alert

edit
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

edit

Kashmir conflict

edit

Hi Bharatiya, please see the edit restrictions stated at Talk:Kashmir conflict. Every revert needs to be explained on the talk page. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for notifying about that. Will take care next time. Bharatiya29 08:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I was coming around to see if I should block you but I guess you didn't know about the restrictions. I'll assume Kautilya3's explanation is applies to you for this time. --regentspark (comment) 14:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

edit

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

edit

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

edit

Balochistan conflict

edit

Hi Bharatiya, are you still interested in the content you have added to Balochistan conflict, which has been repeatedly deleted? Would you like to take it to WP:DRN? Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 08:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) Kautilya3, this aint the first time you have been told to stop WP:CANVASS.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 08:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
This has nothing to do with WP:CANVASS. I was the one who started this whole discussion and Kautilya just wanted to ask my current position on it. @Kautilya Can you please brief me on what happened in the past few days. I was inactive as I am busy because of the college admissions. Bharatiya29 10:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nothing much happened. There was some edit-warring between various socks deleting and reinstating, but the dispute is still in the same state. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
It seems that we should take it to WP:DRN in order to get a resolution. Bharatiya29 14:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

edit

DYK for Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur

edit

On 14 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur, will start functioning in a temporary campus at Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited's Regional Telecom Training Centre? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

edit

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

edit

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

edit

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

edit

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

edit

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

edit

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016

edit

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

edit

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Bharatiya29. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

edit

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

edit

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

edit

Train-the-Trainer 2017: Invitation to participate

edit

Hello Bharatiya29,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?

  • Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
  • An editor must have 500+ edits.
  • Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here.
Regards. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

edit

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

edit

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

edit

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

edit

DYK for Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bhagalpur

edit

On 11 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bhagalpur, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Government of Bihar started a bidding process to get an industry partner for the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bhagalpur, but no bidder emerged? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bhagalpur. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bhagalpur), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

edit

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

edit

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

edit

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

edit

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

edit

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Bharatiya29. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:IIIT Bhagalpur.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:IIIT Bhagalpur.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

edit

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

edit

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

edit

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

edit

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

edit

FLC

edit

Hi Bharatiya29, can you please leave your comments at my ongoing flc? Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

edit

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

edit

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

edit

Delhi Meetup !

edit
 

Hello ! Greetings of the day ! A meetup plus onsite editing event is being planned in New Delhi, this Sunday. I request you to please attend the same. More details here -Abhinav619 (talk) 04:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

edit

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Bharatiya29. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

edit

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

edit

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

edit

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 Reminder

edit

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  •   L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  •   Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  •   MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  •   Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  •   Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  •   Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

edit

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  •   Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  •   Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  •   Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  •   Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by   Barkeep49 with six GAs,   Ceranthor,   Lee Vilenski, and   Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and   MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

edit

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

edit

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  •   Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  •   Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  •   SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  •   Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply