Open main menu

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

  (Redirected from Wikipedia:PERM)

Administrator instructions

Requests for permissions

This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, template editor rights and AutoWikiBrowser access.

Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 01:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)


Permissions

Handled here

User groups

  • Account creator (add requestview requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
  • Autopatrolled (add requestview requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
  • AutoWikiBrowser (add requestview requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the quick guide on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
  • Confirmed (add requestview requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
  • Event coordinator (add requestview requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
  • Extended confirmed (add requestview requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
  • File mover (add requestview requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
  • Mass message sender (add requestview requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have had made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
  • New page reviewer (add requestview requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
  • Page mover (add requestview requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
  • Pending changes reviewer (add requestview requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
  • Rollback (add requestview requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
  • Template editor (add requestview requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

Handled elsewhere

Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

Removal of permissions

If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

Note: The bureaucrat, checkuser and oversight flags cannot be removed using this process page; those need to be posted at Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

Process

Requestors

To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

Any editor may comment on requests for permission.

Administrators

Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

Current requests

Contents

Account creator


Autopatrolled

User:SportsGuy789

I have created dozens of articles, none of which have been tagged for any improvements, and I fully understand how to cite references (and I do, every time). For examples of articles created just within the past few days that I know far exceed the quality of what most new articles are (at a base level), see this, this, and this. I don't want other editors to waste their time reviewing what I created, considering the quality / notability of what I submit. SportsGuy789 (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done. Precisely 143 short stubs. Such short articles do not demonstrate the full knowledge of page creation. It does not take long for a patroller to review such a stub. Let others be the judges of the quality of your work.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
I accept the refusal at this juncture, but I know my work is still way better than most of the crap that gets put on here initially, so I'll judge my own work myself, thanks. SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

User:AdrianWikiEditor

I have created nearly 40 pages mostly on astronomy and NGC Catalogue. I am very familiar WP:N and WP:PG. I have also made over 2,400 edits on the Mainspace and, most notably, adding these 2 images of JoJo Siwa. (1 and 2) AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 23:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done – Almost all of your article creations are from the past couple months, and at least a couple have been deleted via PROD as a result of notability concerns. This thread also indicates that your new page creations could still benefit from independent review; in particular, your final response there seems to suggest a misunderstanding of what the autopatrolled right is for. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Wikaviani

I have created more than 30 articles about various topics (Sports, history, news, weaponry, etc ...) and i expect to keep being active in article creations. I have more than 7000 edits (some 3800 in the main space). Best.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 22:42, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 22:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done - Your recent article creations have mostly been one-line, uncategorized stubs with questionable sourcing. Some are orphaned and many have article problem tags. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Juliancolton, the articles you're referring to are indeed stubs about young athletes and are of course intended to be expanded as time passes, with the rise of their notority. That said, i can understand your concerns. Thanks for having checked my demand. Best regards.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 20:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

User:ZLEA

I've created over 35 articles since I joins Wikipedia in January 2017. I have made over 7,000 edits and am familiar with WP:N. ZLEA T\C 13:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  Done MusikAnimal talk 00:46, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Nehme1499

With 70+ articles created, and 10,000+ edits, I feel that I can be regarded as a trusted user. With my created articles mostly consisting of Lebanese association football players and clubs, I have been careful in adding the correct sources to verify the subject's notability. I also have a good grasp of the concept of biographies of living persons. Nehme1499 (talk) 23:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Netoholic

User since 2004, with a few dozen pages created. Just annoyed by getting notifications anymore. -- Netoholic @ 02:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

User:CptViraj

I've made over 6000 live edits. (totally 10000). I've been blocked once because of copyright violations, 2 weeks ago. But now i'm familiarized with Wikipedia Copyright Policy. I've published around 20 articles. Now i'm mostly focused on nominating g13 eligibe drafts and u5 eligible userpages. I'm Autopatrolled on Commons. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:48, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]) and has created roughly 14 articles. MusikBot talk 14:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done - certainly not. You were blocked for copyvios less than a month ago. I'm sure you're working diligently to put that in the past, but there is absolutely no reason your new articles (of which there are only 13, not the 20 you claimed and not the recommended 25) should not still be reviewed. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:56, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
🤦 This happens with me everytime. -- CptViraj (📧) 15:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry this is a recurring issue. I'd strongly advise you to withdraw from pursuing advanced permissions for several months while you continue to edit constructively and demonstrate your familiarity with our core content policies. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Hmm, you are right. Thanks and Regards! -- CptViraj (📧) 15:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser


User:Path slopu

Requesting permission for using AWB to do repetitive edits in Wikipedia. Through this I can use AWB and JWB. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
  Comment: What edits did you have in mind? ~Swarm~ {sting} 06:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
@Swarm:For doing tasks like adding wikiproject banners in talk pages of articles, adding reference section with {{reflist}} template on article (most of them are stubs) which haven't it, adding templates in articles , stub sorting, etc. Regards.--PATH SLOPU 12:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Nealbo

I've been fixing typos, common grammatical errors, spacing errors etc. but it is very time consuming relying on manual Google searches. I'd like access to AWB to be able to complete these repetitive tasks and remove the manual/time consuming elements of this process. I of course understand that any such edits need to be checked thoroughly for (sic), direct quotes and the context within the article before publishing. Nealbo (talk) 17:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 17:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

User:TheDoctorWho

I would like access to AWB to help me make tedious edits quicker that would otherwise take a while. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Vulphere

I would like to make tedious or repetitive editing tasks quicker and easier.--Vulphere 18:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Catsmoke

I'm requesting use of the AutoWikiBrowser so that I can correct an error we find in many Wikipedia articles: text which does not conform to the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guideline regarding commas "in geographical references that include multiple levels of subordinate divisions".

For example, the tool could be used to transform this frequently-found type of non-standard usage

He was born in Chicago, Illinois to working-class parents.

to the standard English

He was born in Chicago, Illinois, to working-class parents.

and that would be a boon, for our great project.

(There are other ways to remedy this punctuative blight on Wikipedia, and I am trying to figure out a more wide-ranging fix, but this would allow us to take a much-needed step.)

I would use the AWB with care, and closely examine every change it proposed, to make sure that we are applying standard English punctuation, and that we are applying an edit which fully conforms to all of the requirements of the Wikipedia Manual of Style, in each and every context and circumstance.

Thank you, for considering my request. catsmoke (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

User:EggRoll97

I would like to assist in fixing typos in the mainspace. My mainspace edit count is over the required 500 total edits. EggRoll97 (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment This user has approximately 101 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 01:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed

User:ArizonaCitizen02

Want to be able to publish a draft page that I worked on and created. I am missing the 'move' function. ArizonaCitizen02 (talk) 07:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done Please add {{subst:submit}} to the top of your draft to request a review. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

User:SportsGuy789

I have created dozens of articles, none of which have been tagged for any improvements, and I fully understand how to cite references (and I do, every time). For examples of articles created just within the past few days that I know far exceed the quality of what most new articles are (at a base level), see this, this, and this. I don't want other editors to waste their time reviewing what I created, considering the quality and notability that I submit. SportsGuy789 (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC) SportsGuy789 (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. MusikBot talk 15:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

User:LogicalGuessing

I believe I can help with the betterment of this website. LogicalGuessing (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 17:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done - Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you're used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5% of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that 95% of the articles can use your help right now! — JJMC89(T·C) 04:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

User:R.E. McNair

R.E. McNair (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC) I have a free image to upload which u took myself
  Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 20:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done - If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, the Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for Upload process, which does not require any special permissions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Rjdsocialmedia

Wrong photo uploaded on my Wikipedia page. Rjdsocialmedia (talk) 04:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done - If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, the Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for Upload process, which does not require any special permissions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Event coordinator

User:Official bigmel

Official bigmel (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 10:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done no reason stated, also left a mess behind on this page. — xaosflux Talk 14:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Gweduni

I am running an editathon on Saturday 29 June and there are likely to be new editors there. I was given this permission last summer when I ran two editathons at Edinburgh University Gweduni (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  Donexaosflux Talk 14:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Extended confirmed


File mover


Mass message sender



New page reviewer


Page mover



Pending changes reviewer

User:Gorkypickeral

I am an extended confirmed user currently using Twinkle to revert vandalism. Pending changes rights would further aid me in anti-vandalism work, as well as accepting useful contributions by other editors. Gorkypickeral (talk) 18:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Cagliost

Want to be able to accept pending changes on articles I'm interested in/editing. I meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Becoming_a_reviewer. cagliost (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Galatz

A number of professional wrestling article are often left sitting for a while awaiting pending changes to be approved. Trying to help out with the backlog on the articles I am familiar with. With 90,000+ edits I feel like I meet the criteria for understanding what to approve and what not to. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 18:45, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Elfabet

I would like to re-apply for Recent Changes after completing my trial period last month as instituted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs).Diff I believe I could continue to provide worthwhile help to the project via the permission.

Thanks for the consideration. Elfabet (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Willbb234

I see a lot of pending changes on Day of the year pages as I am a member of WikiProject:Days of the year and it would be great if I could help review them. Willbb234 (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Aggarwala2727

Well I want to have this right because it's been time for me editing Wikipedia and I think I could contribute more after being granted this right. clickheretogototheuserpageofAggarwala2727 (talk) 05:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Colin M

An article on my watchlist (Juan Sebastián Elcano) is under pending changes protection, and I'd like to be able to help out reviewing changes on it. I'm familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, and have a pretty good track record of identifying and fixing vandalism. Colin M (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Creffett

I often patrol recent changes using Twinkle, and so I'd like to be able to mark pending changes as reviewed while I'm looking at them. I've read over all of the requirements and policies at WP:RPC. creffett (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Rollback

User:Mjs1991

I've been on Wikipedia since 2009, being involved in various tasks. I have been involved in reverting edits of vandalism in the past, I believe having the rollback option a lot easier for myself.

Thanks Mjs1991 (talk) 07:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

  Done MusikAnimal talk 00:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

User:ClueRootEspresso

Working on pages which include multiple edits including vandalism, where it would improve my workflow to have access to rollback permissions. I have been on Wikipedia for some time now, therefore I believe I am able to demonstrate my conformity to Wikipedia guidelines and the ability to make positive contributions. ClueRootEspresso (talk) 10:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 11:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

User:ImSonyR9

I am contributing on Wikipedia since 2016 having more than 8000+ edit in English and Bengali wiki. I have created several pages and developing many articles everyday but there are several pages, which are in my watchlist, are often being vandalized by some users who make disruptive edits to those page. They don't even pay any heed despite warning them not to do so. So, I hereby request to give me rollbacker rights so that I can prevent those vandalism and can always contribute to develop those articles flawlessly. ImSonyR9 (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Nehme1499

As I often find myself having to revert unconstructive vandalism, especially relating to Lebanese association football articles, I would find it useful to have the ability to roll back those edits. Nehme1499 (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Vercelas

Hello. I think this flag would help me in the fight against vandalism, a task that I intend to carry out in the long term. I know the rollback right, because I have it on Spanish Wikipedia and Wikidata. Regards, Vercelas 21:54, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Jack90s15

I started off rough with Wikipedia but I am starting to learn the ropes of it, I have been primarily sticking with undoing vandalism and disruptive editing I fell like having Rollback rights can help me with undoing vandalism and disruptive editing and also being able to use Huggle to can help me with the fight on vandalism. Jack90s15 (talk) 01:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 01:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

User:De la Marck

I think it would make my editing more efficient. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (De la Marck) (talk) 04:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Balon Greyjoy

I am interested in becoming more proficient at anti-vandalism. I am currently enrolled in the CVUA and am a user of STiki, and have enjoyed slowly becoming more involved in the "behind the scenes" parts of Wikipedia (recent changes, new articles, etc.). I'm hoping that I can use rollback to decrease the longevity of vandalized pages. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Kanarya08

I'm committed to combating vandalism on Wikipedia and regularly patrol recent changes to do my part in keeping the Wiki clean. I would use these permissions to utilise software that makes cleaning up vandalism more efficient. Kanarya08 (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Vwilding

I previously applied for Rollback but had only been contributing for a short amount of time. Although I've only recently come back from a wikibreak for my education, I have a history of combating vandalism and I believe I have proven myself through CVUA training and using Twinkle and STiki. The main reason I'd like Rollback is to enable me to use Huggle and hopefully speed up my ability to combat vandalism. Thanks! :)  vwilding talk 00:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 00:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Nigos

I've been undoing vandalism for some time now, and this tool would make it easier for me to revert vandalism. I also would like to use Huggle, which is only possible with Rollback. Huggle and rollback would help me quickly spot and undo vandalism. Thanks! Nigos (t@lk Contribs) 09:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

User:InvalidOS

I was about to use Huggle to fight vandalism today, and then I realized my rollbacker rights had expired, as they were only available for a 2-week period. Consider this a review of my actions with rollback. As such, I will admit, I have made some mistakes when I first received the right. A few examples of such mistakes include:
  • While using Huggle, not noticing that vandalism was reverted, and reinstating the vandalism I intended to revert.
  • Not checking previous edits (again, while using Huggle), leading to multiple good-faith contributions being reverted because I thought there was an instance of unexplained page blanking.
I have learned from these mistakes, and will do my best to avoid making these mistakes again. If these mistakes are enough to bar me from receiving rollback rights again in the near future, I understand.   InvalidOS (talk) 12:35, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 12:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  Not done. You seem to be reverting edits indiscriminately. For example: 1, 2, 3. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

User:KIENGIR

All the details are here ([6]), Swarm seems busy or forgotten to answer? Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)) KIENGIR (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Viztor

Hi, I'm active in AfD and also anti-vandal, I want to use huggle and it's only possible with the rollback flag. Viztor (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Template editor