Wikipedia

User:Keeper76/dashboard

< User:Keeper76
userpage | talk | dashboard | rfa | contribs | subpages | freqtemps | afd/o | archive


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 98
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 92
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 17
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 3
Candidates for speedy deletion 30
Open sockpuppet investigations 80
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

Administrative backlog

Requested RD1 redactions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported


CSD / PRODs

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 3
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 1
Spam pages 6
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Other candidates 26

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 29 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 32 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Crimean Tatars

Reason: There is a consistent pattern of POV pushing and a biased agenda from this IP. IP user claims that Crimean Tatars are descended from Anglo-Saxon settlers during the Byzantine era. He is using a non-reliable news source about Anglo-Saxon settlers, but the source does not mention any connection between Crimean Tatars and Anglo-Saxons. In fact, last citation does not even contain word "Crimean Tatar" It'd be great if an advanced editor or administrator can shorten the Tatarization section of the article.

He also doing a similar thing to Crimean Goths. I attempted to discuss this issue with the editor on the talk page of Crimean Tatars 9 months ago, but they have continued to engage in edit warring in different time periods. Some of their IP addresses were blocked earlier this year. This is straight vandalism at this point. I request a page protection for few months. Auzandil (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

  Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Camel urine

Full protection: There seems to be a persistent battle between different parties that want to remove content because they do not like it One party seems to be Muslim and the other Hindu and there appears to be a lot sock pupery involved. Hardyplants (talk) 11:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Averroes International School, Dhaka

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP socks. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected and now that its not, the same persistence from IPs adding unsourced programs has returend. Have reverted numerous times with warnings since last protection to no avail. CNMall41 (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

List of Maggie Smith performances

Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring. Warnings have been left on their talk page asking them to discuss the matter (and a talk page thread has been open), but they have continued to edit war.

There is more than one IP address being used, but it’s clear they are the same person. Page protection would be appreciated. - SchroCat (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Nancy Marchand

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after expiration of previous protection. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Nissan Cherry

Reason: High level of vandalism. 2A02:C7C:ACD6:1C00:A595:C942:21E4:DAFE (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Pratihar (Rajput clan)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE Persistent disruptive editin by multiple sock hoppers. ®asteem Talk 20:41, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

The Bloodline (professional wrestling)

Reason: Hello, I would like to request Extended confirmed protection for the The Bloodline article. There are too many accounts making too many changes against Wikipedia's policy and guidelines such as No original research, Fancruft as well as straight up vandalism by editors with no regard or little knowledge of how Wikipedia works and due to the popularity of the article there is simply no way to control it and it is slowly descending into chaos. This is why I request this and I hope this issue can be fixed. Here a few diffs that were previously asked for that can show my point further [1] [2] (Most of this had to be reverted by another editor) [3] These are just a couple of examples but these editors edit the page against the template set out and provide unecessary details and unverified claims and it needs to be put right otherwise it's just going to continue, and just for referencing purposes [4] this is how it should be set out and this was before most of the disruptive editing occured. If you need any more diffs to prove what I'm saying is true or if there is any need for further proof, please let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Maia Reficco

Reason: High level of vandalism when already discussed in Talk page. LMOBX (talk) 23:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Jewish National Fund

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CTOP/A-I. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Foreign interference in the 2024 United States elections

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Recent disruption of this CTOP (WP:CT/AP) - request temporary arbitration enforcement to prevent further disruption/misinformation until after the election (1 week). Raladic (talk) 23:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

The Kelly Clarkson Show season 6

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user. They keep on changing the link for You Lie (Cee Cee Chapman song) to You Lie (Reba McEntire song) though they have been told that is not the correct link for the song. Multiple times today (November 3) they have changed it to the wrong link. They have done the same thing in the past two days but under another IP number. HappyAppy10 (talk) 01:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Patrick Syring

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli Conflict and associated disruptive editing. The topic area has a WP:ECR, so this should be indefinite. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Mukund Varadarajan

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IPs and some autoconfirmed accounts are back after the protection was enforced. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Thunivu

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Camilear (talk) 05:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Someone is just making same edits to this page with different IP's, I reverted their unsourced edits, but still that IP user is doing same again and again, you can check the page history. Thank you. Camilear (talk) 05:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

2024 Missouri Amendment 3

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

This is urgent. 174.30.12.241 is clearly watching the page and putting false information as propaganda attempting to influence the vote that’s happening tomorrow. The text of the amendment is in the article and you can clearly see that what they’ve repeatedly put in the heading (that many users other than myself have had to remove multiple times) is a lie. Please help. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 06:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I count about 10 edits in the last week. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
That same editor (as it is clearly the same person) has reinstated that same lie within a day of it being removed by three separate editors on three separate occasions. They reinstated it after I removed it *less than half an hour later*, and they will certainly put it up again as soon as they wake up today. And we are talking about misinformation with the potential for extreme consequences here. *Please* get some experienced editors to watch the page in anticipation of that so they can quickly revert it, at least. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 07:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Also, you’ll see variations of the same thing being done many, many more times on that article in the short time it’s existed if you look back just a little further. There is not nearly enough attention being paid to it by good editors. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 07:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Please, can another editor who doesn’t work for “Campus Crusade for Christ” look at how vulnerable this page is to extremely dangerous misinformation and do something about it? 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
I agree with my esteemed colleague: the disruptive activity isn't high enough to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
*ahem* I have never been employed by that organization, and my conclusion has absolutely nothing to do with the content of the article nor my personal politics or religion. I find the accusation a bit rude. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
"And we are talking about misinformation with the potential for extreme consequences here." Rest assured that the article in question is getting such low traffic that the potential for "extreme consequences" is virtually nil. Chetsford (talk) 08:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Alexandre Réis

Reason: High level of novice editors who still do not understand how Wikipedia rules work and modify articles and are soon subject to quick elimination or consensus. Joaquim Nero (talk) 07:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

  Declined No disruptive activity I can see. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Samson Option

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. Page history over recent years appears to be almost entirely made up of ECR violations by IPs and registered account as well as edits by multiple socks that have been blocked. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Template:Party politics

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by User:Aditya Chonker and multiple IPs. There's no reason to capitalize all the words of a term. Terms should be presented consistently with the title of the article about it. Annh07 (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Motives for the September 11 attacks

Reason: High level of IP vandalism . 178.81.55.110 (talk) 10:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Shari's Cafe & Pies

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – As soon as protection was lifted, anonymous/brand new account original research returned. Can we have it protected longer?. Graywalls (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

List of Philippine Airlines destinations

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Keeps adding random terminating routes that doesn't connect to the source giving.Drcarrot.phd (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Ada vbe Eben

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Talk:Mohammed Deif

Unprotect: The talk page was recently semi-protected due to unregistered users using the talk page as WP:FORUM on Mohammed Deif's death. At the time, his death was in dispute. Now that his death is no longer in dispute, and the article shows him as dead, I don't think the talk page needs to be semi-protected any more. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[5] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[6][7][8].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[9]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[10] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[11] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[12]][[13]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[14][15] and a form of Holocaust erasure[16], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[17][18][19][20]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Vice regent: Would you please make this change, so we can close this request? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

Stated Israeli tank losses in casualty and losses infobox are incorrect, attributed article from Business Insider states "The IDF again had problems with anti-tank missiles during the 2006 war in Lebanon, when Hezbollah employed Russian-made Kornets. Though about 50 Merkavas were damaged, only five were destroyed, according to the IDF, which also struggled with poorly maintained vehicles and ill-trained crews." Casualties and losses box states this number as if it was from current conflict. Article does, however, state that "Israel has lost nearly two dozen tanks during fighting with Hamas since October 7." I believe losses of tanks in the infobox should be fixed to reflect this. 155.225.2.98 (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc

Please help me in creating the page Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc. Thank you. பொதுஉதவி (talk) 04:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Red panda

Under subtitle: Distrubution and habitat. ADD When it comes to their natural habitat, red pandas have a smaller home range of 3.4 km^2, while the giant pandas have a home range of 6.3 km^2. That's about a 30% difference in their ranges. Both species cover 481 meters of daily distances and frequently visit the same bamboo patches, but their activity patterns are different. Red pandas are nocturnal and maintain a consistent activity level throughout the year, but giant pandas have irregular intervals of activity between day and night varying by season. (Johnson, K., & Schaller, G. (1988). pg 552). Hcruz05 (talk) 03:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

15 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Noarticletext-nopermission (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-editnotice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotice load (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice load/notext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice/notice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-02-14: "Highly visible template: and included in a high-risk template"
Template:Editnotices/Group/Template:Editnotices (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request) 2024-10-09 18:48 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Bad image list (request) 2024-10-29 04:22 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Redwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
Module:Separated entries (request) 2024-10-29 12:19 Fully protected (log) Modified by Amorymeltzer on 2018-12-17: "High-risk Lua module: Over 2M transclusions"
Template:TextLicenseFreeUse (request) 2024-10-30 15:39 Fully protected (log) Protected by Dcoetzee on 2005-04-09: "Need to protect licenses from modification"
Brianna Wu (request) 2024-10-30 23:52 Fully protected (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2023-06-24: "Arbitration enforcement"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Similar (request) 2024-11-02 08:11 Fully protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Similar: Protected by AmandaNP on 2011-05-31: "User request within own user space"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
4 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-10-10 09:41 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Coat of arms (request) 2024-10-30 09:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Updated (request) 2024-11-02 08:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox airport (request) 2024-11-02 17:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)


WP:RFA

RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Voorts 107 7 3 94 21:06, 8 November 2024 4 days, 9 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 11:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFP

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Davidindia

Davidindia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) He has created a remarkable total of 647 articles on English Wikipedia, with only 4 deletions. This impressive accomplishment highlights his expertise and dedication. Primarily, he focuses on biographies of sportspersons and politicians, demonstrating a strong understanding of these subjects. Additionally, he treats fellow editors with respect and professionalism. Thank you! Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Though all the articles they have created cover notable subjects, almost all of them are missing a talk page, which are then created by NPPs. Some older articles are missing default sort, DMY formatting and very short articles do not need multiple sections; rather, they should be consolidated into a single Life or Career section. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:AxonsArachnida

They have created 545 clean articles, none of which have been deleted. Their creations focus on spider species articles, so I believe their articles no longer need to go through NPP review. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 06:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Aschbren

Reason for requesting confirmed rights: According to my notifications I made my 10th edit four days ago and I created my account on 11 October 2024 (more than four days ago), but I have not been automatically been added to the autoconfirmed user group. Aschbren (talk) 18:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

  Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 18:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Aschbren (talk) 18:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

User:1255979u

Hey, I would like to be confirmed as I am engaging in multiple editing already, and would like to further the discussion I have started under the UC Berkeley post. I have been providing edit on the page which has been recognized, but right now the semi-protection posed on the Berkeley wiki has stopped me from editing the post. I've done a few editings with IP address too, without recognizing the need of logging in. Thanks! 1255979u (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Absolutiva

I should grant my page mover rights, so I can finish mass-moving titles like "minor-planet" (in hyphen) for "minor-planet designation". As per WP:HYPHEN, so I can move these titles for meanings of minor-planet names from 80001–81000 through 543001–544000. Absolutiva (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had an account for 30 days and has 1226 total edits. — MusikBot talk 11:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
  Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Toadspike

I'd like to be able to take care of technical requests like the one I just posted [21], instead of having to wait for someone else to do them. I've participated in several move discussions and even closed a few – having this userright would also make it easier to close RMs. As far as I can see, all of my technical requests have been performed, and none of my RM closes have been contested. Toadspike [Talk] 11:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Toadspike [Talk] 11:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

  Done for a three-month trial; feel free to re-request a week or two before it expires. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Yovt

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I have been active on Wikipedia for a while, focusing on improving content quality and helping maintain the integrity of articles. I am not new to reviewing edits, as I use edit-request tools to answer several requests by unregistered/registered editors that wish to see changes on several articles. I have read all policies on how to handle this right and know the responsibly that comes alongside it. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not done solely on the basis of this. Anarchyte (talk) 09:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
I had created that redirect as one of the replies at Talk:Houston Astros sign stealing scandal#Article Title; I never have nor do I intend to publish my personal opinions about sports (or anything) on Wikipedia. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 17:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

User:BittersweetParadox

I would like to help contribute to the Wikipedia community and help reviews happen quicker. I am passionate about unbiased true information being presented and I think this would be a good privilege for me. BittersweetParadox (talk) 07:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TyphoonAmpil

I've been patrolling Recent Changes since August 28, 2024, and I helping to review pending changes. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 02:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([22]). — MusikBot talk 02:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikibear47

The pending changes reviewer will help me improve my ability to combat vandalism on Wikipedia. I have a good understanding of the relevant policies. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Edasf

Expand my works on Wikipedia.I want to counter vandalism and help Wikipedia by reviewing pending changes fastily and correctly. I have read all guidelines and policy I have also created some articles.Edasf (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Bunnypranav

I have been patrolling recent changes from the past month and a half. I am familiarized with the policies of vandalism, BLP, NPOV and verifiability. I believe am experienced enough to receive this right and would like to accept pending changes. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done -Fastily 11:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Avishai11

I love helping with new edits and making sure they are 100% correct and appropriate! I would love to help even more with this permission. Avishai11 (talk) 20:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Mims Mentor

Hello, I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights. I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for over 5 years, with a strong focus on editing and combating vandalism. I am now keen to broaden my role by helping to review newly created articles, ensuring they meet Wikipedia's standards to qualify as stand-alone pages.--— MimsMENTOR talk 17:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC) — MimsMENTOR talk 17:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

User:MSLQr

Being a recent changes patroller for a while, I am already well aware of the content polices concerned with NPOV, NOR, BLPs and CV. I have also been using Twinkle and AntiVandal tools for a while to combat especially vandalism and unsourced changes to articles. I've read about the feature and the guidelines regarding reviewing process. I think my editing history is enough to meet the criteria making me applicable to review the pending changes. MSLQr (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback


Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TyphoonAmpil

I've been patrolling Recent Changes since August 28, 2024, I've revert vandailsm and LTAs, I'am over 200 reverts form vandalism, and I'am interested the tools named AntiVandal and SWViewer, so I can patrol more faster. Criteria to make Successful:

  1. ✅️ At least 200 mainspace edits.
  2. ✅️ At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
  3. ✅️ Wait 1 month your request.
  4. ✅️ No recent history of edit warring.
  5. ✅️ A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. [23]

Thanks.   (please   mention me on reply)
Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 02:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([24][25]). — MusikBot talk 02:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
I do for ~99% vandalism reverts, and +210 warns. 2 forgotten reverts and 1 LTA revert. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 13:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Yes, and I try do it also, I warning editors, and sending messages saves form the UV menu. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 09:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily diffs
  1. WP:DENY, Toad4707 is a LTA, does warn.
  2. No explanation.
  3. bad faith revert no exlanation
Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 08:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Toad4707 wasn't locally blocked or g-locked at the time you made the revert. Unless you've got a crystal ball, how could you possibly have known that? Not that it matters anyways, in this situation WP:DENY isn't a valid excuse to skip warnings. Also, I see you've neglected to leave notifications again for these reverts (1, 2) -Fastily 08:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Yes WP:DENY isn't a valid excuse to skip warnings. 2 forgots, and ~99% warns, also do not bite the newcomers. also reporting SRG, LTAs global locks. Also WP:DENY, LTA reverts. 1st on Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing very old revert, dose not warn. 2nd on Talk:Camera, No explanation forgot it. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 09:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
RC Patrol isn't a race to see who can perform the most reverts. If you're having trouble keeping the quality of your reverts high, then you need to slow down. Also ,1 is not a "very old revert". Why would you think that? -Fastily 09:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily yes, RC Patrol isn't a race to see who can peform most reverts is fast. (1:37 UTC (9:37 PHT) time to 10:00 UTC (18:00 PHT) time), Yes isn't "very old revert" diff, while adding "Hame burger chess burger big Mac whooper", undid edit because vandalism. All my reverts is very high track record. No problem. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 09:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
To be frank, the responses you've provided above suggest to me that you're still learning how Wikipedia works and would probably benefit from more experience. I don't think you're quite ready for advanced permissions just yet, but please keep up the good work and consider reapplying in a month. Closing as   Not done -Fastily 11:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Bunnypranav

I would like access to rollback to use Huggle and other tools for more efficient vandalism reverting. I am re-applying after a month since my last request, based on a comment by Fastily. I have gained more than a months experience, a meet the minimum requirements. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([26]). — MusikBot talk 11:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
  Done -Fastily 11:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

User:TheWikipede

I would like to have Rollback access to use Huggle and so I can revert vandalism more easily and efficiently. TheWikipede (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has 35 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 19:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
  Not done Please see the notice at the top of this page; with only 35 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have the necessary editing experience for advanced permissions. Take a moment to check out CVUA, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Thanks, Fastily 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Rasteem

I respectfully request Rollback access to facilitate the use of Huggle, which will allow me to promptly and efficiently revert vandalism. I've been monitoring Recent Changes for the past 2-3 months, reverting disruptive edits.

I'm familiar with some Wikipedia policies, including: Reporting repeated vandals after 4 talk page warnings at WP:AIV, reporting reporting sock puppet accounts at WP:SPI and following the 3-revert rule (WP:3RR). And also I'm familiar with the use of Twinkle. ®asteem Talk 20:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 21:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Fastily, I'm already using Twinkle. I've warned many users for vandalism, but I don't warn new users who have made only one edit, as per "Back Biting" guideline. Instead, I typically warn a user after their second vandalism attempt. But in future I'll consider warning users even after one non-constructive edit. ®asteem Talk 21:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
No, that is incorrect. You need to be leaving notifications (or warnings) for every revert, regardless of how many edits the user has made or whether this is the user's first instance of vandalism. -Fastily 01:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Done}} I'll always leave a warning notice on their talk page without digging into their number of edits. ®asteem Talk ®asteem Talk 01:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Great, could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will always be notifying all editors when you revert their edits? Also please don't use {{Done}} or {{Not done}} in your replies to me; on this page at least, these are for admin use only. -Fastily 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Sure, I'll do RC patrol & will always notify users when I revert their changes. I sincerely apologize for using {done} or {not done} previously. ®asteem Talk 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

User:MersmanD

I would like rollback right because: 1. I am a Recent Changes Patroller, who knows what is considered vandalism 2. Because when multiple occurrences of vandalism is occuring I have to go 1 by 1 and that can take time to revert all the vandalism. 3. I also just think it would help me fight vandalism in general. Thank you for any consideration. MersmanD (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has 19 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 01:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
  Not done Please see the notice at the top of this page; with only 19 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have the necessary editing experience for advanced permissions. Take a moment to check out CVUA, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Also this was grossly inappropriate, do not do this again. Fastily 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, if you were referring to the edit count, it was all in one space and I was trying to delete a point and accidentally deleted the number and the 100 was merged into the text below, in this case the edit count. Sorry for the edit I made, I will be more careful next time. MersmanD (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
I will be more careful with my edits in the future, especially with formatting. MersmanD (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Hilst

I'm requesting template editor rights so that I can perform template mergers more easily (like the one me and Rjjiii completed over at {{Archive}}) and for moving prep areas to queues at DYK. – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 21:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1.  Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~3)
  2.  Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~20.5k)
  3.  Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~600)
  4.  Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5.  N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 2)
  6.  N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3)
Primefac (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Footer

Policies and links

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Keeper76/dashboard&oldid=720126735"