- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. I reckon this user is !HERE.
|The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:|
|There are no outstanding requests for account creator.|
|Requests for autopatrolled|
I would like to request autopatrolled permission for my Wikipedia account. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since 2020, focusing primarily on creating articles related to geography, biography, and, notably, articles aligned with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chenab Valley. I am committed to maintaining high-quality content and believe that autopatrolled status would assist in streamlining the workload for new page patrol, given my consistent contributions. Thank you for considering my request. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Requesting autopatrolled rights, per recommendation of User:TheTechnician27 on my talk page. Since I came back to Wikipedia earlier this year, I've created 40+ articles, had 20+ on DYK, and generally been a responsible editor and page creator. Longhornsg (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
I have been regularly editing Singapore entertainment-related articles and have created 70+ pages to date. I believe I have a fair understanding of the policies and thus am requesting autopatrolled rights to cut down the workload of editors who are patrolling new pages. Mcdynamite (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
|Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access|
I'd like to add importances to the ~3,500 unknown-importance articles in Wikiproject Brazil and I think this tool can help me bulk-edit talk pages. BaduFerreira (talk) 22:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
I have noticed that the eponymous article for university categories is often either missing (eg several in Category:Wikipedia categories named after universities and colleges in China have no articles at the top level) or incorrectly sorted (eg in Category:University of La Laguna) and wish to use AWB with a suitable module to correct this easily. Perspicax (talk) 22:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
|There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.|
|Requests for extended confirmation|
I am requesting extenderconfirmed rights to assist me in translating articles, especially to assist me in extending stub articles in foreign languages. I have read through the perms and requirements, and understand it is unlikely I will get the permissions due to how new I am, but I will use the tools wisely and sparingly. (No harm in asking, after all.) UnexpectedSmoreInquisition (talk) 16:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
|Requests for mass message sender|
Mass message sender
|Requests for new page reviewer|
New page reviewer
I particularly enjoy helping new editors who are figuring out Wikipedia still, but have a strong passion for learning how to help the encyclopedia. I can more closely relate to these users because I myself was one only a year ago, and after this last year I feel confident in my knowledge on article creation, deletion as well as Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.
There have been ups and down this last year. Don’t get me wrong! Some articles I have learned are not quite ready to stand alone, and others almost seem to write themselves. I am not perfect, and I am still learning every day. However, this is exactly why I think helping out new editors would be a role I’d find very fulfilling. I want to help people learn to edit for Wikipedia — not get overwhelmed by the process.
I was granted the perm for one month. I would like to continue reviewing and assist with the NPP backlog drive which starts in October. I am requesting the perm be extended. Lightburst (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC) Lightburst (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
I would like to new page reviewer rights as I meet the numerical criteria for the right. I have prior experience in AfD and have a tendency to greet IP users with Twinkle, and try to AGF. I have experience in moving pages and no behavioral blocks or 3RR violations in the last 6 months. Thanks, Brachy08 (Talk) 03:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: Going to help with the New Pages backlog in October, only temporary rights would be needed during this initiative. Would request permanent later if I'm able to continue and the need still exists. cliffsteinman -- Discuss 05:33, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
I bring with me extensive experience in both article creation and editing. Additionally, I've reviewed numerous AfCs, and I'm happy to note that none of my reviews have been revoked or raised concerns. I'd like to assist in addressing the backlog of new pages awaiting patrol. Rkieferbaum (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
I have gained experience in reviewing pending changes, fighting vandalism and creation of articles. I really would love to review new articles for their adherence to different Wikipedia policies. Adilalishah 03:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I am interested in becoming a New Page Reviewer and willing to help in reducing the backlog. Please review my request and guide me if I am eligible to become New Page Reviewer or not. Thanks Charsaddian (talk) 20:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I was previously granted NPP on probation and used it to review articles as suitable. I would appreciate if I could be granted the right permanently if an admin deems it fit. Thank you. – Isochrone (T) 16:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
|Requests for page mover|
My page mover trial is expiring in ~1 month and I’d like to have it extended indef so I can continue handling Requested Moves/Technical requests and it often helps with some of my NPP activities such as backlog drive coordination and draftifications. I was active for most of the start of my trial however I took a wiki break for a few reasons and holidaying but I’m back mostly active again. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 20:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I'd like to help out more at RM and RM/TR; closing discussions and filling technical requests – most of the time I can't because it requires moving over a redirect. Page mover rights would also allow me to draftify articles (something I frequently do for NPP) without leaving cross-namespace redirects. The right would also allow me to assist at CfD, as I would then be able to close requests or discussion involving category renaming (moving).
I've recently been desysoped. I need to reapply for some permissions I'm qualified for but are bundled with the admin rights I've lost. This is one I think. Still figuring out what other rights are normal at my editing level. Thank you. Cheers, Mark Ironie (talk) 01:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
I'm currently nearing the end of my three month trial and would like to extend the right. I use it exclusively for NPP work, sending problematic/unsourced articles to draft without leaving redirects hanging around, and have no current reason or desire to use the right for other more technical moves. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
|Requests for pending changes reviewer|
Pending changes reviewer
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I have been editing since January 2022 and meet all the criteria for gaining Pending Changes reviewer right. I might not have rollback rights presently but I have had a commendable track record using the "Undo" tool as well as countering vandalism on free articles which can be edited even by unregistered users. Many of my edits are focused on accuracy and relevancy and for that reason, I am one of the top three contributors of all time on pages such as Catherine, Princess of Wales, William, Prince of Wales, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates and more to name a few. I also aspire to move a number of pages accurately and precisely in the near future and more importantly, gaining review rights only helps me in doing so. Also, I am currently part of a discussion to move the page Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) and I believe I will respect my powers as a reviewer and not misuse it. Thank you. MSincccc (talk) 07:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In a nutshell:
1. use reliable sources
2. report what the sources say
3. try as best as possible to provide two separate points of views to provide balance/neutrality
4. If the article is about a person that is still alive, the information added has to be sensitive to the person to which the article is dedicated to. "Contentious", meaning that could be a source of conflict, needs to be removed
5. Editing for editing's sake and disrupting the quality of the article is an act of vandalising and needs to be stopped. Editing is an art and content and information must be handled with care
6. if there is an issue but unable to proceed, mark the issue with a tag/template
7. all statements should be sourced, or briefly alluded to if the sources can back up the clarification.
8. All information and digital content needs to avoid infringing on copyright. All images, including those licensed under Creative Commons, need to have written permission for release on WP. Any uploads done without the author's consent warrant a strike and warning from admins, with further violations resulting in the offending editor's blocking/banning from WP
I have over 1000 edits of editing not for editing's sake, but to contribute by fixing neglected articles where they could be fixed. The above points are my general modus operandi. With all this said, I wish to put myself forward to help WP at the next stage Saussure4661 (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done (for the bot). Anarchyte (talk) 09:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
|Requests for rollback|
This may be a bit premature but I'm going to be bold and ask for rollback rights.
I have been editing Wikipedia for almost 5 years and have made over 4000+ edits in the mainspace. I understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specially patrolling possible vandalism.
Hello, I am requesting rollback perms to help better fight vandalism using the AntiVandal tool. I have a track record of anti-vandalism which is mainly through monitoring recent changes using the RedWarn patrol script. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 12:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Most of my Wikipedia edits consist of cleaning up vandalism. While the undo tool is useful, often I find myself having to manually repair multiple changes. I'd like the rollback tool to be able to work more efficiently when I find complex vandalism. Dan Leonard (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback rights so I can handle vandalism in other forms other than Twinkle and RW, which I find to have been slower recently. I've also been looking into Huggle, and since it requires rollback rights, I thought now would be the time to ask. I have been dealing with vandalism for years now and know when and how to use it. Thanks for looking this over. Kline | yes? 23:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights
I have been editing since October 2021 and believe I can make good use of this privilege. I have a good track record of providing justified edit summaries, being one of the all time highest contributors on a number of pages of well known individuals and also have been countering vandalism and irrelevant changes made across pages. Thank you MSincccc (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
|Show account creator|
Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
|Show extended confirmed|
Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
|Show file mover|
Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
|Show new page reviewer|
Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
|Show page mover|
Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
|Show template editor|
Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.