User talk:Scope creep/Archive 4
Edits to Hikimi wasabi edit
Hello! You made a couple of edits to hikimi wasabi, and I can't really make sense of either. Have you perhaps pasted some random Japanese text into Google translate, and then added the resulting junk to the article? If so, please don't. But if you can explain the edits, fine, otherwise I will just revert them. (Really speaking, it is touch and go whether this is vandalism...) Imaginatorium (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Imaginatorium, It is not vandalism. I promoted it out of Afc, when it looked certain to be a candidate for deletion. You seem to have turned up out of the blue, and taken WP:OWN ownership of the article. I was planning to convert the references in part to English, so there is some idea of what they mean in English. When I started nobody was working on it. The English text are placeholders only , until I can get around to reform the whole ref properly, and check that the translations are correct with the reference desk. If you are planning to do it, then I'm happy somebody is doing it, as it needs to be done by somebody who knows the Japanese language scope_creep (talk) 10:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Edits concerning ENnies edit
I saw that you removed references to the ENnies in Chris S. Sims (game_designer)' WP article. Especially in the phase of a deletion request going on, I think that's a bit weird. As far as I understand, you removed the references because they are blogs. Well, the official hompage of the ENnies is structured like a blog. That's how they communicate the winners of their awards. I would ask to revert these deletions. Many other WP articles about RPG professionals reference to won ENnies. Or are you challenging the notability of the ENnies in general? Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Interstellarpoliceman, Blogs are Non RS in Wikipedia. They are classified under WP:UGC and as such are not available for use on Wikipedia. No I'm dont thinking i'm challenging the validity of the ENnies. I don't think the ENnies site is under editorial control. It is looks like a blog, because it written like a blog. I'll check with reliable sources, to make sure. If they say cool, then I will put it back. scope_creep (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Interstellarpoliceman, Thats it posted to Reliable Source. They will determine if they are good or bad. The whole article has had a whole bunch junk reference that are primary in nature, and are not suitable for BLP article. scope_creep (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! Two thumbs up! Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Both the ENnies references dont mention him by name. What is the linking criteria supposed to be that makes the reference valid. scope_creep (talk) 17:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! Two thumbs up! Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Interstellarpoliceman, Thats it posted to Reliable Source. They will determine if they are good or bad. The whole article has had a whole bunch junk reference that are primary in nature, and are not suitable for BLP article. scope_creep (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Holger Jens Schünemann: Revision edit
Hi, I've noticed you categorised my text as an article with undisclosed paid content. I appreciate your input to the article and I understand all your remarks that I fully agree with, but I find surprising the hidden category. The Holger Schunemann's wiki note already exists in German, so I hope there is no problem to continue it in English. This were my first steps in wiki creation, so I don't see commercial context that you do (for me the note about software made by the IT company was just objective, but I can understand also your approach). I hope we can leave Schunemann's bio without this humiliating category. Thank you for all your valuable corrections. Cheers, Aldona
Public Netbase edit
Hey, I could use your advice. One of my current pet projects is cleaning up the page of Public Netbase in Vienna. They were based at Museumsquartier once and that's why I have an interested in cleaning up their page (as most pages I'm working on are somehow connected to Museumsquartier). As an org they are pretty much defunct, but there are still a bunch of folks around that were part of it in the 1990s and early 2000s. I suspect some of them (co)wrote the WP article. Most of the references are to their own project pages. I'm not challenging the relevance of the org, but the page looks a bit advertise-y, does it? Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 14:47, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Interstellarpoliceman, it seems to have an advert tag added by SPA account, but it it not too bad, as as creative group that should be notable. It could do with a copyedit to check the refererences are valid and checking spelling, grammer, layout. However, whole lot of the references are invalid as they point to blogs, and there is very few secondary sources, which satisfy WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ok. I will work on some copy-editing. What concerns me most is that most of the references are to domains like world-informatiom.org and ***.netbase.org and other domains, so they are linking to their own sources. Most of the projects they did had tons of secondary coverage, but they link to their own pages. I fear I have to do a lot of research and replace all their self-references with actual valid references. Brrrr. Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- High quality references are the watch word, or phrase. Strong enough to hold for 100 years. scope_creep (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ok. I will work on some copy-editing. What concerns me most is that most of the references are to domains like world-informatiom.org and ***.netbase.org and other domains, so they are linking to their own sources. Most of the projects they did had tons of secondary coverage, but they link to their own pages. I fear I have to do a lot of research and replace all their self-references with actual valid references. Brrrr. Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Interstellarpoliceman, it seems to have an advert tag added by SPA account, but it it not too bad, as as creative group that should be notable. It could do with a copyedit to check the refererences are valid and checking spelling, grammer, layout. However, whole lot of the references are invalid as they point to blogs, and there is very few secondary sources, which satisfy WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
National Archives edit
Hi there, unfortunately the file you mentioned is over 150mb. Is there some specific piece of information you're after? Otherwise easier to download yourself, I think. It's just too big for me to move around easily. --Mr impossible (talk) 13:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Heinz Wolfgang Herzfeld edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Heinz Wolfgang Herzfeld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 22:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenneth Cross (physiologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fool (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dmytro Kremin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Steve Down Recent SEC News & Related Coverage Reversal of Edits edit
Scope creep, I noticed your recent reversal of edits to the Steve Down page I've made related to the recent plethora of news coverage related to the conclusion of an SEC investigation, which resulted in a consent to the charges. This does represent a consensus? - Anon1-3483579 (talk) 15:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Anon1-3483579, I know, but it is creeping back to the same pattern of do/undo that was seen 6 months ago. Why not raise an WP:RFC and determine what the consensus is. Create it on the talk page of the Steve Down and once it has run, the consensus will be established, and there will be no change, unless there os some change in life circumstances. At the moment, the continual reversions are likely to get the editors banned. scope_creep (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Scope creep, okay, I will look into this when I have a chance, thanks. - Anon1-3483579 (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Sasha Carrion, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Scope Creep. I've added the above as a courtesy as part of some post deprod cleanup. FWIW, I didn't deprod the article myself and it was deleted last year; however, it has been just restored per User talk:Explicit#Your deleting my Sasha Carrion page. If you still believe it should be deleted, then please use WP:AFD this time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018 edit
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Deletion pending for File:Achara Stone.jpg edit
Hello, Scope creep. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Achara Stone.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.
- If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
- If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018 edit
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018 edit
ACTRIAL:
- WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
Deletion tags
- Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.
Backlog drive:
- A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
Editathons
- There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
Paid editing - new policy
- Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
- The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
News
- Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
- The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:William Robert Baxter has a new comment edit
- Hi Theroadislong, I don't think we have spoke before. How are you? It is not my draft. I'm rescuing it from the wilderness so to speak, as the article subject has a CBE. Thanks for moving it into draft space. I couldn't figure out how to do it, without doing a raw xcopy. scope_creep (talk) 15:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: William Robert Baxter (May 26) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Robert Baxter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Robert Baxter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Scope creep!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: William Robert Baxter has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk) 08:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Olsson has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur John Priest has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC) Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of Jerome Lecat edit
Dear scope_creep, I respect your thoughts about Jerome Lecat. But i found the subject notable on the basis of few resources such as verified twitter profile of Jerome Lecat (https://twitter.com/jlecat), https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/24/scality_gets_escape_velocity_funding/, magazine-decideurs.com, https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/jerome-lecat/entrepreneur-francais-dans-la-silicon-valley-depuis-10-ans-je-s_a_22044508/ and https://www.fondationdefrance.org/fr/portrait-de-philanthrope-15 and Wikipedia also contains a page of his company Scality.
I am trying to remove the PR & self published links, Can you please help me to find the primary, blog and press releases links (that you mentioned in your comment) so that i could remove and place the good secondary resources. I would also request you to replace the deletion tag with a maintenance tag and i will try to fix the issue.DangLu79 (talk) 06:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Dear Scope creep, i removed the deletion tag, reason i have explained above. If you feel the tag must be there you are welcome to add this back. But i would request you to again please consider all the facts & resources before deleting the article.DangLu79 (talk) 07:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Nextdoor Update edit
Hello,
I am writing because you participated in the AfD for Nextdoor. There is now an updated draft at: User:BC1278/sandbox/Fifth_Wall with the changes underlined, and an explanation of its relevance in the AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fifth_Wall_Ventures. I cannot update the article directly because I have a declared COI, although the requests are all on the Talk page. Thanks, Ed -BC1278 (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
Disambiguation link notification for June 11 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cipher Department of the High Command of the Wehrmacht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matrix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
You need to edit
read WP:AADD.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 14:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dear ~ Winged Blades. What it is regarding, the WP:AFD, changing my vote? I read that ages ago. It a subset of a much larger superset. scope_creep (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Elimination Drive edit
Hello Scope creep, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
- As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
- Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar:
. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 
, 
, 
, 
. - Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Regarding COI edit
Hi there. I undid this edit of yours because while COI editors are strongly advised to stick to edit requests, they are not actually forbidden to edit articles. If the edit itself objectively improves the article, reverting the edit and asking them to request this edit to be made does not really help in the long run, does it? As such, you should take care not to undo edits just because the editor has a COI but look at the edit as well. After all, policy says that a procedural, coding, or grammatical error in a new contribution is not grounds for reverting it, unless the error cannot easily be fixed. Regards SoWhy 16:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harrapool, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018 edit
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Valamis Group Ltd. page review edit
Hello and thank you for your help with Valamis article. I would like to review removed part with [[1]] The issue is next, in Great Place to Work reference page you need to select the year to see the results, and because first is always the current year, you cannot see results of previous years.
Also, why you've added <ref name="jim"> to the same year award if they are different?
Best regards Ivan.Andreev (talk) 08:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan.Andreev (talk • contribs) 07:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ivan.Andreev Please sign your comments with ~~~~ so folk can know who you are. Probably a simple mistake. It can be rectified fairly easily. scope_creep (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
scope_creep not notable awards removed. I have some questions: 1) what about different offices? maybe add them in an Organisation section? 2) in 2008, Arcusys merged with Puzzleteq Oy, but I can't find any reference for it in the web, skip it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan.Andreev (talk • contribs) 09:51, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ivan.Andreev PLEASE ADD four dashes after your message, so we know who you are. Office and office location are advertising and are not notable. If there is no reference, don't put it in. scope_creep (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 2 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Blair-Bell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sinclair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Dunoon edit
Hi Scope creep, feel free to use a gallery or hack away at anything I've done. I'm pretty much finished with anything I'm going to do with the article. It badly needs some of the "references" cut down but I was a bit reluctant knowing how long they take to make.AndrasSkot (talk) 14:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- AndrasSkot, I don't mind doing it. It has been flagged for lousy refs, some self published.scope_creep (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eastern Front and Tarnov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Loch Tummel edit
Hi there, I'm a bit unsure about your edits on Loch Tummel. I don't think we should really be using the values from the bathymetric survey because the hydro scheme has increased the size of the loch quite considerably: Tom Weir gave a length of 7 miles, which is much longer than the 4km you've put in the infobox, and a glance at the map shows that this is the case. See also the hydroelectric section of the article. Grinner (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Grinner, Yip. I think your right. I've just checked it on Google Earth. I have made a mistake. I stupidly never noticed it, busy charging on, that is the problem. I'm change it back tomorrow. I have a couple of other reservoirs I'll need to check, that I was working on today. I'll need to check all of them. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. scope_creep (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- No worries, I think the bathymetric survey is the usual "gold standard" for data on Scottish lochs, so it's easy to forget that it can be out of date where the level has been raised.Grinner (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yip, I thought I was the only one who knew about the bathymetric survey, but then I started to see the reference everywhere. I'm trying to get all the lochs in. I'm doing the Tay basin at the moment, although somebody has partially completed it. I'm glad that somebody is working on the list. I use this: [2], which provides everything apart from mean and average depth, and breadth and length. I have no idea where the depths for reservoirs are. scope_creep (talk) 21:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- No worries, I think the bathymetric survey is the usual "gold standard" for data on Scottish lochs, so it's easy to forget that it can be out of date where the level has been raised.Grinner (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Grinner, Yip. I think your right. I've just checked it on Google Earth. I have made a mistake. I stupidly never noticed it, busy charging on, that is the problem. I'm change it back tomorrow. I have a couple of other reservoirs I'll need to check, that I was working on today. I'll need to check all of them. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. scope_creep (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 28 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Donald Court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to University of Newcastle
- Funkabwehr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Antenna
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018 edit
|
Hello Scope creep, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Your help desk question edit
You didn't get a response. Did you find an answer to your question about categories for professors? I wouldn't know how to help.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Vchimpanzee, no. There is no biographical category as such for professors, which is unfortunate and weird really. There is category for specific professorships, for articles about a specific professorship position, but not for biographical articles. Taking a look at this category:[[Category:Professorships_by_university_or_college]]. You can see that it has positions for 12 universities, although it should contain about 110 odd. Obviously it is still under development, but where is concomitant categories for professorships. There needs to be a series of categories like Professors from Oxford University and so on. Essentially what has happened, is that the article cats are in, but not bio that fit that position. scope_creep (talk) 20:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018 edit
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the pic, but shouldn't it be on Commons? Philafrenzy (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- P.S. Here's a younger one. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- I never saw that one. Maybe you could use both of them. Do you always take the younger person? It is habit more than anything else posting the image locally as the commons wizard never worked correctly back then. I'll start using it. scope_creep (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- There's no policy on it but generally I prefer a younger picture as it tends to show people in their prime, while the old pictures tend to all look the same. The article is long enough now to use both. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Curiously I take reverse view, when I can get hold of an image. I always tend to think when they are older, they look more distinguished. scope_creep (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- No reason not to use both as you say. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- There's no policy on it but generally I prefer a younger picture as it tends to show people in their prime, while the old pictures tend to all look the same. The article is long enough now to use both. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- I never saw that one. Maybe you could use both of them. Do you always take the younger person? It is habit more than anything else posting the image locally as the commons wizard never worked correctly back then. I'll start using it. scope_creep (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Sasha Carrion for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sasha Carrion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Carrion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Dawson Williams.png listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dawson Williams.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 12:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Funkabwehr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018 edit
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
Recreating an article edit
Hello Scope creep, so I see an article I voted on (Crystal Newman) was finally deleted. In your comment you stated you would recreate it if it passed notability and I think it does. So please recreate it? I would help recreating it but I don't know how to recreate a deleted article. Does it follow the AFC process too? YaraBo (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi YaraBo, I suggest we start from scratch. First thing we need is here full name, dob, where she was born and what she is notable for. Or you could ask a nice admin to put the text of the article in a sandbox, where we can have a look at it. If there is sufficient sources, then we can do an article. If not them we can draft it. Try the admin first. Kudpung is a good start. scope_creep (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Scope creep, check this link for the deleted article. Though I feel it should be toned down to NPV. YaraBo
- Coolio, we have a starting point. Are all these dates accurate? I will start it on Monday. I shortly heading away for the weekend. The references look quite, for the first four anyway. I will check the rest of the article, and refs, and then we will make a start on Monday. The awards are non notable, except possibly one. Really need more in the way of biographical information, not just career highlight. scope_creep (talk) 09:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep. Welcome back from the weekend. I think the dates are correct because they are the ones I found in references. I also checked the references they seem good. YaraBo (talk) 08:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Coolio we will make a start on it. scope_creep (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- YaraBo, That is the initial article created. I will work on the rest of it, over the coming days. I checked the references, some of them are not suitable, but what is there should be a substantial article. scope_creep (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Feel free to update the article yourself YaraBo.
- YaraBo, That is the initial article created. I will work on the rest of it, over the coming days. I checked the references, some of them are not suitable, but what is there should be a substantial article. scope_creep (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Sangu edit
Hi Scope creep. I was just wondering why you removed this section from Sangu's article? What do you mean by saying that it's not notable? She has appeared in commercials for well-known companies; I don't think that can be labeled as minor trivia. That's what actors, actresses and models do after all. Keivan.fTalk 15:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Keivan.fTalk The reason I removed I did is due to the fact that I don't think they are particularly notable. Here in the UK famous folk in adverts are not particularly celebrated or reviewed, or commented on. I think they are considered a subform, compared to film or series. There are generic, a face selling a common product, that has been on tv 20-40-50 years. I think, in a top 100 list, possibly notable. I don't see any text on WP regards notability about except this note 5:
- Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources.. Also particularly in these early career articles, it is a form advertising, to show that they are getting work. scope_creep (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open edit
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys (AAML) has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk) 08:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Zinovia Dushkova edit
Hi This one sets my spidey-senses tingling. A SPA who created, and has spent a lot of time buffing up, a laudatory article on someone with a tendency to write in woo-infested areas. Guy (Help!) 19:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Guy, I read Madame Blavatsky's book when I young, it was crazy stuff, theosophy. Never really understood it. She was famous in the late 70's, that was part of occultist tradition is Russian. This stuff looks similar, a progression sort of. But if it is not, then its for bin. I think it needs an independent check from a Russian language editor. 22:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated edit
Hi, I'm John from Idegon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
John from Idegon (talk) 03:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- John from Idegon, why did you unreview the page? scope_creep (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- The article is at AfD and is the creation of a sockpuppet. The better question is why you marked it reviewed in the first place. It sure shouldn't be indexed at this point, and functionality, that is what reviewing does. It removes the NOINDEX attribute. John from Idegon (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Scope creep, thanks for the thanks. I was on the point of asking User:John from Idegon User:Swarm to restore the article on the basis that your substantial subsequent edits had made it ineligible for G5. Then I noticed that you had signed up for the G5 deletion yourself. Not sure why you did that. SpinningSpark 17:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi SpinningSpark, there was a bunch of revdels on it, and only the last two edits seemed to be of any value, and I thought it better if it went. I have seen a couple of articles like recently, where the revision history was exceedingly poor at the start. It was the process. I truly believe the Academy was notable. It works mostly with the 1%, making a very powerful and wealthy organisation, and notable for that alone. I think at some point in the future it will get an article, particularly with the fact that it is mentioned 100's of times in the newspapers.com archive. As a learned society it was also notable. Thanks for the keep vote.scope_creep (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- @SpinningSpark: It was eligible for G5. Those "substantial edits" you're referring to were pretty minor. The promotional cruft was removed, and one brief sentence mentioning the fact that the Academy produces its own journal was added, but apart from that, the article was indistinguishable from what was authored by the sock. That is not to say that either of you can't REFUND it if you wish to take responsibility for it. Swarm ♠ 18:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Vizeadmiral Erhard Maertens.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vizeadmiral Erhard Maertens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived edit
|
Hi Scope creep! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Schlüsselgerät 39.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Schlüsselgerät 39.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Funkabwehr, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thebes, Loutsa and Kalamaki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced edit
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced edit
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018 edit
Hello Scope creep, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
- Project news
- The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
- As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
- There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.
- Other
- A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
- Moving to Draft and Page Mover
- Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
- If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
- Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
- The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
- The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
|---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Herbert R. Spencer edit
On 23 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Herbert R. Spencer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1901, Herbert R. Spencer described how to turn a baby should it be in the breech position before birth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herbert R. Spencer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Herbert R. Spencer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Dawson Williams edit
On 25 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dawson Williams, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1904, Dawson Williams, editor of the British Medical Journal, commissioned research from Edward Harrison that exposed numerous medications as "valueless"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dawson Williams. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dawson Williams), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Have your say! edit
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Picture at Heubach (Halterner Mühlenbach) edit
Hi Scope creep, you added the picture of the Sythener mill to Heubach (Halterner Mühlenbach). However, this mill is not situated at the river described in this article.
It is somewhat confusing, because the German article de:Halterner Mühlenbach describes water with two different names, namely the waters of the Heubach which then split into a small water called Umflut and the water of the Halterner Mühlenbach. Thus, the German article assumes that Heubach is another name for the upper part of the Halterner Mühlenbach.
I've found this confusing and decided instead to create two different articles for the English Wikipedia, namely Heubach (Halterner Mühlenbach) and Halterner Mühlenbach for this. The Sythener mill is situated near the mouth of the Halterner Mühlenbach, therefore the picture does not fit into the Heubach article. (You may proof this by clicking on the picture and then at "Standort", there the coordinates are given.)
Sorry for the confusion --Cyfal (talk) 12:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Cyfal, Its cost you a bit of time, although I wouldn't have seen it without some explanation. Thanks. Lovely picture though. It seems really idyllic. scope_creep (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed. It appeared magically already on this version of the Halterner Mühlenbach, although it is not present in the source code of that version. I've added it now plus a caption. BTW, thank you for all your nice "Thanked" for my edits in Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350! --Cyfal (talk) 13:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Cyfal, Its cost you a bit of time, although I wouldn't have seen it without some explanation. Thanks. Lovely picture though. It seems really idyllic. scope_creep (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018 edit
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Made Bhanumathy Narasimhan's article in a neutral point of view edit
Thank you for your suggestions. Made this neutral point of view, can you please check this now. Thammudu (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinese Psychological Society has been accepted edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk) 14:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Tables and Accessibility edit
Hey, I noticed your question in the Help Desk. Please be aware, that while technically what you are doing will work, you shouldn't be doing it that way. There are accessibility issues that come with tables which require tables to have among other things, headers. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial for a more detailed explanation about this.
So this:
- a) Alphabetic simple polyalphabetic cipher
| Clear alphabet | ABCDE...... |
|---|---|
| Cipher alphabet | DEFGH...... |
Should become this:
| Method? | Result |
|---|---|
| Clear alphabet | ABCDE...... |
| Cipher alphabet | DEFGH...... |
Hope this helps you. --Gonnym (talk) 14:53, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Gonnym:,Hi, I have never done it that way. It has been a slow crawl up from making a box, then adding a column, and so on. I have loads and loads tables completed in the past. I will add this feature in, over the next few weeks. What about captions for files, when you have the box, does it need a top caption, that I am possibly missing. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 14:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- There is a much better look about them about them. scope_creep (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
EXAMPLE 3 1 4 6 7 5 1 Clear R E F Y O U R M E E S A G E F R O M J A N
How would you format that. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Do you mean a file image like this?
These should follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Images and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Images.
Regarding the table, I have no idea what the fields mean, so this is how I would do it. If headers need to be span-ed, then they could be done as you normally would.
| header | header | header | header | header | header | header | header |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXAMPLE | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 1 |
| Clear | R | E | F | Y | O | U | R |
| M | E | E | S | A | G | E | |
| F | R | O | M | J | A | N |
--Gonnym (talk) 15:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Gonnym: Aye, should there not be a caption on top of it, like perhaps Skyo Device. I was thought there should have been one, but couldn't locate an example of its use anywhere. scope_creep (talk) 15:58, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
| Example | Clear alphabet | Cipher alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern | ABCDE...... | DEFGH...... |
| Encryption | BAD DAY | EDC CD |
I'll do that, compress the page a bit, and looks better as well. scope_creep (talk) 16:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Who will review this article ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vnarsimhan/Banumathi_Narasimhan Thammudu (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for October 9 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oskar Vierling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electroacoustic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me with The Mind of Jake Paul edit
Thanks for helping me with The Mind of Jake Paul! I was talking to the user and do you think that it is sound like a fan wrote it? Coasterdude1 (talk) 01:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Any more corrections needed? edit
Thanks for your suggestions on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vnarsimhan/Banumathi_Narasimhan, do let me know if this is ok now or anything else is needed? Thammudu (talk) 04:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK edit
Hello! Your submission of Neo-Bechstein at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ∯WBGconverse 07:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
A goat for you! edit
.jpg)
When will this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bhanumathi_Narasimhan be reviewed again?
Thammudu (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- User:Vnarsimhan The wikipedia process is for somebody else to look at in review. I have done as much as I can to make it pass. It might be worth expanding the article life section. Hope that helps. scope_creep (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Image without license edit
Unspecified source/license for File:Sir Leslie Alfred Charles Fry.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Sir Leslie Alfred Charles Fry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
GOTHBOICLIQUE edit
Hi, can you check my updated draft please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keditz (talk • contribs) 14:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
A Dobos torte for you! edit
.jpg)
|
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. It was the least I could do. Anytime scope_creep (talk) 18:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018 edit
|
Hello Scope creep, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 24 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santiago Graf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ager (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Weinberger has been accepted edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk) 11:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep, Please elaborate why you decline the draft. I have provided 17 references which show significant coverage. Request you to go through the references. Let me know if you need any other information. Thanks, Risu43 (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Risu43, Will do. When I looked at it, these references seemed to show somebody who was in a very early career stage, with the references a much of a muchness, but I'll take another look per. scope_creep (talk) 10:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Taking a look at each reference in turn:
- Ref 1. First film as director Times of India
- Ref 2 Kickstarted his career. Times of India.
- Ref 3 Name drop Times of India
- Ref 4 Day 4 Film growing, name drop. Times of India.
- Ref 5 Debut film as director Showsha First post
- Ref 6 Name drop - article is Aishwarya Rai
- Ref 7 Name drop - casting Aishwarya Rai Hindustan times
- Ref 8 Interview debut film feature India Express
- Ref 9 Interview - same film Hindustan Times
- Ref 10 Debut film director, interview India TV
- Ref 11 Some controversy, same film Times of India
- Ref 12 Debut director listing Times of India
- Ref 13 Debut direct, interview India today
- Ref 14 Song controversy, debut director, the pioneer
- Ref 15 Debut director, interview, The Hindu
- Ref 16 Debut director, inverview, Filmibear
- Ref 17 name drop. India
Risu43 I've looked at it. 17 references in an all. There is coverage in multiple newspapers, but they are name drops, interviews, and a little controversy about changing a song lyrics, from an former advert director who is making his first feature film. All indicate that is zero coverage outside the first film, with interviews and name drop being very low quality sources, essentially all the same information, i.e. a push a advertisers and branding to market the film. All of it indicates that director is non notable at the moment, probably WP:TOOSOON. Coverage had been generated mostly I think, due to Aishwarya Rai acting in it.
Discussion you previously took part in edit
A discussion you previously took part in, at Ron Stallworth, has spawned another attempt by an editor to force his scan of a yearbook picture onto the page, at this new discussion. As your previous response was well-thought-out and cogent, I thought you might want to weigh in on this one as well. Thanks. Amsgearing (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Scope, at the page that he's canvassing you to, I've asked whether this lower-contrast version addresses some of your concerns. Can you say more about what quality problem you see, and maybe help fix it? Dicklyon (talk) 02:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Page mover granted edit
Hello, Scope creep. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi TonyBallioni that will help in the ceaseless activity of removing promotions and branding. Thanks.scope_creep (talk) 14:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018 edit
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of places in Highland (council area), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kilbeg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Page Review Notification Question, Nov 2018 edit
Hey there! I got a notification that says "The page User:LikeMeercats (me) has been reviewed." and the notification comes from you. I'm very new here and not totally familiar with everything (really a lot of things...). I am curious what this means and would be grateful if you could point me towards the right direction. I read this link, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers) but am not sure if the two are related?
In any event, have a great weekend! LikeMeercats (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi LikeMeercats How are you? It is peer review mechanism that Wikipedia uses to ensure each page is correct. All page updates are reviewed. There is two big peer review mechanism within Wikipedia, which are used to review articles and ensure they follow policy in terms of design and content, including the Manual of Style. The first WP:NPP is new page patrol. You review new pages, created by established authors, to ensure they are actually encyclopaedic. The second review mechanism is WP:AFC, where new Draft articles are created by editors who not autoconfirmed, i.e. new editors. It enables these inexperienced editors to create articles, where they can be reviewed and improved, or rejected if they are absolutely terrible, re:G13. They were previously two separate processes within WP, but they are currently being combined into a single system, where an editor can review an new page, via page curation or review a draft article, using the same page curation wizard. It was all designed in the last 6-9 months, e.g. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/AfC Process Improvement May 2018 The testing for the combined system, re:new page curation tools, was about a week ago, and could be live now, if not soon. The whole system is designed to improve the quality of new articles, and to enable the reviewing of incoming articles to ensure junk, spam, promotion, etc, etc, can be removed. Take a look at the following: Wikipedia:ACTRIAL, which was voted in via consensus to Wikipedia:ACPERM, which became WP:NPP. Hope that helps. scope_creep (talk) 22:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Tried to move a page but it was flagged as vandalism edit
Hey there! Thanks for replying earlier, just following up here. Is there anything I could help you with for this?
Bananasareyummy12 (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 7 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ragusa and Loutsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
CommonBond draft edit
Hello, this is Scott from CommonBond. I was just checking to see if you’d be able to take a look at the edits I’ve proposed for my employer’s page at Talk:CommonBond. A few months ago you mentioned you would take a look. Please let me know if you have any questions. Scott at CommonBond (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Scott at CommonBond, I look at them now. scope_creep (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Draft edit
Can you review my draft please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keditz (talk • contribs) 13:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- List of clearance settlements in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Anne Greenough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Newcastle
- Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kalamaki
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018 edit
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Scope creep,
- Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
- Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
- If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
- We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
- With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kofi Byble edit
A tag has been placed on Kofi Byble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Neo-Bechstein edit
Hello! Your submission of Neo-Bechstein at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Scope creep. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Neo-Bechstein edit
Hi, I just wanted to encourage you not to give up on DYK so quickly. While the rules state that an article must be 7 days old, that doesn't mean you can't work on it in your sandbox for months before moving it to userspace, or, as I do, working on it on your home computer for months before posting it. Best. Yoninah (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Neo-Bechstein edit
Hello! Your submission of Neo-Bechstein at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 24 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Hall (paediatrician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House officer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for your question. Actually, I'm just reviewing the topic and now I feel like in 1941 the source could only mean the other Osipenko - now called Berdiansk. --Jakas1 (talk) 14:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018 edit
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 2 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valborg Aulin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Composition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards edit
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thanks for keeping non-notable pages to a minimum in wikipedia. Vonfraginoff (talk) 10:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
comprised of edit
You recently left a message on my talk page indicating that you think "comprised of" is British English and that I changed it to "consisted of" because that is American English. I just want to let you know that there is no regional variation between acceptance of "comprised of". As you can confirm in American English dictionaries, it is commonly accepted everywhere. It's also commonly rejected everywhere, whereas "consists of" is universally accepted. Hence my edit.
Furthermore, even if the phrase were uniquely British, Wikipedia guidelines urge using language common across all regions where possible. I assume you agree that "consists of" is good British English.
Finally, the particular usage of "comprised of" you are supporting is not supported by any dictionary I've seen. The usage that is common enough to be acknowledged in dictionaries is "x is comprised of" or "x was comprised of"; not "x comprised of".
The phrase "comprised of" and whether it should be in Wikipedia is an interesting topic that has been discussed extensively over the years on my talk page. Your points have been brought up many times. While plenty of editors agree with you that there's no value in removing this phrase, plenty more are in favor. I wrote an exhaustive essay about all this, which does cover regional variation and the role of dictionaries in choosing Wikipedia article wording, if you're interested in why people think we're better off without this phrase. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Webbed foot has been accepted edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018 edit
Hello Scope creep,
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
- Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
- Less good news, and an appeal for some help
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
- Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
- Training video
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Jenny Dixon Draft edit
Hi Scope-creep – Thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jenny_Dixon. All sources should now be fine – NY Times, artnews.com (magazine founded in 1901), artforum.com (magazine around since the 1970s), Artnet News, which with its predecessor Artnet Magazine has been around since the 1990s – all are legit. Please let me know if there’s anything I can do to move things along. Jdecker12 (talk) 03:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)jdecker12
I have unreviewed a page you curated edit
Hi, I'm MainlyTwelve. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gothic Tracery, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 04:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey, that is an automatic message that is sent when an editor un-reviews a page that has previously been reviewed. In this case, I immediately re-reviewed it as the un-review was an accident.--MainlyTwelve (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi MainlyTwelve I did the exact same thing when I was looking at the metadata on the page curation wizard, to find out why it was unreviewed. scope_creepTalk 20:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
What's wrong with style and content in this article? Karol Szapsza (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Karol Szapsza I should have put a better description in. The lede is too long, there is no sections, the achievement section is getting undue weight within the article, and your introducing non notable people and your using the subjects gamer tag name, which may be ok per wp:commonname but his full name is available for use, and it is more professional to use it. You also introduce names, like TVP, CS:GO, Team VEGA and iNET koxXx which has no context. scope_creepTalk 23:55, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated edit
Thanks for reviewing Colin Kroll, Scope creep.
Unfortunately SamHolt6 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Unrevewing; this redirect has recently been somewhat expanded, and the "new" article needs improvement
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi SamHolt6 I dont think I reviewed that page? scope_creepTalk 00:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: its an unusual scenario, as a logical redirect was created, but today the redirect subject died and as such editors have been building a new article on top of the old redirect. I have unreviewed the article as such, but wanted to make sure I left a supportive note to whomever reviewed the redirect in the past. Anyways, its no cause for concern. Best.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Septum verum has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for December 18 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sandaig Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beinn na Caillich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Mandar Jàmsandêkar edit
You nominated Mandar Jàmsandêkar for AfD but it looks like you did not provide the required notice on the article being nominated. Could you please check to see that you've completed the nomination process? Thanks. Bakazaka (talk) 20:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Shunda xu edit
Hi Scope-creep – Thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FISCO_BCOS. I have received your comments regarding the intention to delete this page and would like to know what actions should I take to avoid such from happening as I am of an amateur level to the Wikipedia editing. Do appreciate your advice and looking forward your feedback Shunda xu (talk) 08:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Shunda xu Sorry for not replying earlier. The reason I sent it to Afd, is that very large amount of these types of articles regarding cryptocurrency (in the large hundreds) and a larger amount for blockchain implementation have appeared in the last couple of years, and it has been decided by consensus that they will not be notable unless they have extensive coverage. There are so many software startups at the moment that are creating blockchain implementations, in the 10s of 1000's at least. Everybody has jumped on the bandwagon and created articles. Unless your product has something unique about it, the article about it will unlikely survive. I knew personally of 5 companies that are all working on blockchain implementations for a specific area. In the last couple of years, a new policy on WP was created called WP:NCORP to address articles about startups, who had real coverage and whose references were all about funding and shareholders. It is likely your article would fall under it. Your product would need to have real coverage from third parties who are independent sources and who are impartial about your product. That would be the only way it would survive. I think if you can find those people, your article has a chance of surviving. At the moment it has no chance, and the references only confirm the existence of the product, not why it should be notable. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 09:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreyash Sarkar edit
FYI, many of the voters at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreyash Sarkar are now blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rbhu23. You may want to reopen the AfD because the sock votes are invalid and you might have a good chance at deleting the article. Regards Flooded with them hundreds 16:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Flooded with them hundreds You know something. I wouldnt even have spotted then. What with Christmas shopping, mental traffic jams and stuffed up with a winter cold, I wouldnt have seen them if they were all standing on my feet, at the same time. I dont plan to reopenit. It has two references, which are top flight, effectivly tier 1. The dude is a poet, no doubt there and notable to boot. Thanks for spotting them. I'll call you in again I suspect if there is socks operating. If I suspect there is socks operating I will give you a shout for a second opinion. scope_creepTalk 17:01, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy Holidays edit
.jpeg)
|
Best wishes for this holiday season! Thank you for your Wiki contributions in 2018. May 2019 be prosperous and joyful. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Noël ~ καλά Χριστούγεννα ~ З Калядамі ~ חנוכה שמח ~ Gott nytt år! |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year edit
|
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
|
Hi Scope creep, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
|
Hello Scope creep, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
The Signpost: 24 December 2018 edit
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
|
Hello Scope creep, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Some banket letter for you! edit
I hope you like almond paste (if you don't, all the more for me). Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Narky Blert (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Xmas edit
Merry Christmas! -Fwth edit
.jpg){kind=link}
Hey Scope creep, i lOvE yOu and wish you a pleasant Merry Christmas and a wonderful New Year.
Thanks for all you do on Wikipedia. 🐇🐇🐇
Flooded with them hundreds 09:38, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings edit
John Emery edit
Hello, Scope creep.
- Do you actually believe "PROFLIC" is a valid English word, rather than "PROLIFIC"? I've corrected it twice, and you have, apparently mindlessly, reverted it twice.
- Do you actually believe that John Emery should be sorted under J for John rather than E for Emery? And that a Defaultsort is somehow unnecessary? Again, my two perfectly correct fixes have been reverted.
Looks like a case of silly season insanity to me, but maybe you have a better explanation. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 01:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi JackofOz Season greetings. I've got to say that I absolutely missed them. It was the mistake, in the date of birth, in the lede which caused the revert. scope_creepTalk 01:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. But I still don't see that I made any mistake in his date of birth, at all. All I did was change the format of the date from the American "October 3, 1915" to the British form "3 October 1915". And similarly with his death date. Since he was a British person, and since the British format appears in the infobox, this seemed eminently suitable to me. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 03:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi JackofOz That is excellent. I never knew that was an American format. But you left a } around instead of a ). I known it is minor, as in inconsequential, I know, but I recently underwent a damascene conversion when I found out several of the articles I wrote were cack, and was show a bunch of errors in them, to make me improve, which I have done. Hope that help. scope_creepTalk 12:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy New Year,Scope creep ! edit
Some celestial fireworks to herald another year of progress for mankind and Wikipedia. All the very best , Scope creep,
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Which categories? Please compare Oxford Street. Xx236 (talk) 08:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Hector Clare Cameron.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Hector Clare Cameron.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)