Open main menu


NotSuckBanner.jpg



Swarm
Home —— Talk —— Email —— Contribs —— Awards —— Dash

Editor - rhodium star I.jpgThis editor is a Senior Editor
and is entitled to display this
Rhodium Editor Star.
Admin mop.PNGThis user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia (verify) and has performed 5211 admin actions.
Wikipedia Administrator.svgThis user has been an admin for
7 years, 8 months and 5 days. (verify)
Ten Year Society userbox.svgThis user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. (verify)
Wikipedia Rollback.svgThis administrator likes to grant extended rights to eligible users.Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg
Yogo2783 Close crop.JPGThis user has been identified as an awesome Wikipedian.
Commons-emblem-copyright.svg This user finds copyright paranoia disruptive.
NoQuacks.pngThis user resists the POV pushing of lunatic charlatans.
No sign.svgThis administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed.

Welcome to my userpage! My sole purpose here is to help my fellow Wikipedians. If I can assist you in any way, leave me a note on my talk page! These days I stick mostly to routine administrative work, but I'm happy to help out in any area of the encyclopedia. X


· Incidents ·
· Vandalism ·
· Usernames ·
· Edit warring ·
· Permissions ·
· Page protection ·
· Main page errors ·
· Articles for deletion ·
· Adminship requests ·
· Admin help requests ·
· General help requests ·
· Block appealsUTRS ·
· Candidates for speedy deletion ·


Administrative logEdit

Overview
Admin actions for Swarm
Type of action Percentage
Deletion/Undeletion 1784
  
34.82%
Block/Reblock 1697
  
33.12%
Protection/Unprotection 988
  
19.28%
RevDel 131
  
2.56%
User rights 524
  
10.23%
Details
Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 25753
Edits+Deleted 27474
Pages deleted 1699
Revisions deleted 130
Logs/Events deleted 1
Pages restored 85
Pages protected 810
Pages unprotected 37
Protections modified 141
Users blocked 1561
Users reblocked 85
Users unblocked 51
User rights modified 524
Users created 85
Pages merged 2
View all logs

Vandalism informationEdit

>Low pending changes backlog: 7 pages according to DatBot as of 17:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 

5.47 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot
15:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC) - update



RfAEdit

Open RfAsEdit

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 13:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Recent RfAsEdit

Recently closed RfXs (update)
Candidate Type Result Date of close Tally
S O N %
Daffy123 RfA Withdrawn 23 Jun 2019 38 84 10 31
Mjs1991 RfA Withdrawn 21 Jun 2019 2 11 0 15
HickoryOughtShirt?4 RfA Successful 1 May 2019 182 19 9 91
RexxS RfA Successful 11 Apr 2019 164 92 15 64
Primefac RfB Successful 7 Apr 2019 151 7 5 96
DeltaQuad RfB Successful 13 Mar 2019 229 6 2 97
Evad37 RfA Successful 18 Feb 2019 212 15 6 93

DiscussionsEdit

ArbcomEdit

MiscellaneousEdit


AdopteesEdit

PhiliaEdit

 This user is an Anglophile.
 
This user is a Germanophile.
 This user is a
Russophile
 
 This user is a Sinophile.
 This user is a Japanophile.
 This user is a Koreaphile.
 This user is a Slavophile.
𐌰This user is a Gothophile.
Hita niutands frijôþ þans gutans.


I would like to believe the above. I became an admin with that as my guiding principle. But being a Wikipedia admin isn’t so simple. How am I supposed to judge someone who’s devoted more of their being to the project than I ever could? Someone who loves Wikipedia just as much as I do, if not more? Just because they don’t follow proper decorum when they’re arguing? This is why highly active editors become immune to regular policy enforcement. In a way, they outrank us. They’ll demonize us and so will members of the community. No one wants to be that admin.

So my ultimate conclusion? Trusilver is right. This is an academic society. You don’t get to be aggressive and hostile just because you’re behind a screen. And, yes, we’ll give you a chance to change, we’ll give you free passes, we’ll literally give you whatever help you need if you call us in. But if you’re a hostile, aggressive bully, you’re gone. Just until you change your ways. We’re not asking anything unreasonable. The top Wikipedia editor is the nicest guy you’ll ever talk to. Wikipedia is no place for malice.