Project | Administration | Text containers | Inline formatting | Redirect categorization | Graphic elements |
Administrative backlog
editReports
edit- 98.232.233.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. At least they don't appear to be, and haven't been reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2405:201:d002:319d:b175:a4cf:58c6:58b1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Appears to be removing wikilink spam added by another user a couple months ago. SpencerT•C 00:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- 129.126.101.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fetid.crust (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- 113.184.221.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sử dụng hợp lí (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- EL VILLANO BEATS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. cross-wiki self-promo. SHB2000 (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- 99.242.84.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Battlefield Heroes: Likely promotion-only account. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 01:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- 129.126.101.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. LR.127 (talk) 02:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sa.swaminathan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. LR.127 (talk) 02:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ghostieisdumb (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(is|was|are|were) ?(a|the)? ?dumb" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Crimeaddicts222 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "crime" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Directsmelly (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "smell(y|s)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Note on file the word "smelly" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Enterurusernamenow (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Чорейбе (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Webbfamily06 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- OfficialDefinitelyTarrell (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- StuffedBattleCatsPlushie (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: stuphphedbattlecatsplushie" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- EverythingistakenwhycantIjustgetone (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Rylezydreck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- Wiki is promoting propaganda (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. I wasn't sure about reporting this as they haven't edited as yet. I apologise if I'm too quick off the mark. Knitsey (talk) 15:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Alternative Facts R Lies (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Huntthetroll (talk) 01:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- FarmCredit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Given the nature of their discussions and edit focus, this is a promotional name. Zinnober9 (talk) 16:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- OfficialDefinitelyTarrell (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See this. Agent 007 (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Jhrtvunbyhhf (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Confusing/gibberish username - WP:UNCONF. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article covers an obviously highly controversial topic. The talk page even has a Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement template yet the article itself has no protection. ―Howard • 🌽33 21:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Note: I don't really see that this falls under said arbitration enforcement...it is broadly construed, but not that broadly, and you would have to go from Arab via Nazi to Israel which didn't exist as a state during the time the article mainly covers; I was bold an removed the template. Lectonar (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA 69.118.230.235 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
+1 Reason: ArbCom protection needed for PIA. Already a couple of reverts on the article. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Question: Any of these reverts involve non-WP:XC users? Please provide WP:DIFFs if so. El_C 18:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- See [1] Wiiformii (talk) 22:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- this* [2] Wiiformii (talk) 22:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- What's been reverted there, Wiiformii? El_C 23:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to format it, there's 1 ([3])
- and 2 ([4]) Wiiformii (talk) 23:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about that, but it likely isn't related to that page, specifically, but just an WP:LTA happenstance. What I was asking about was, again, what was reverted in the first diff you provided, the edit made by that IP. El_C 23:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @El C - If it means anything, I just reverted edits made by an IP in the interest of the WP:PIA ArbCom enforcement. I'll also be removing my duplicate report below, sorry. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Which IP? You two are making this way more complicated than it needs to. El_C 01:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @El C - If it means anything, I just reverted edits made by an IP in the interest of the WP:PIA ArbCom enforcement. I'll also be removing my duplicate report below, sorry. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about that, but it likely isn't related to that page, specifically, but just an WP:LTA happenstance. What I was asking about was, again, what was reverted in the first diff you provided, the edit made by that IP. El_C 23:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- What's been reverted there, Wiiformii? El_C 23:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- this* [2] Wiiformii (talk) 22:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- See [1] Wiiformii (talk) 22:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: CTOP edit warring with a long history of socks. S0091 (talk) 20:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP isn't necessary. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Upgraded to ECP on request. Daniel Case (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Daniel Case: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Unexplained removal of sourced content. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:RUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: WP:PROFRINGE from various IPs. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP disruption. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Original poster is removing deletion tag even though the file is copyright and no license has been given. — Mr Xaero ☎️ 22:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Biased additions/alterations being made by employees and followers of Mr. Intiraymi. One employee (Mala Morrigain) has already been banned for such activities, and now another (Ticin Strausberg) has begun doing the same thing. Captain Bipto (talk) 00:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LR.127 (talk) 01:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
− | sensitive situations. | + | sensitive situations. Nothing in this section empowers editors to enforce arbitration decisions. |
This clarifies the ambiguity at Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_4#c-L235-2021-09-11T07:54:00.000Z-Ymblanter-2021-09-11T07:21:00.000Z and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Extended_confirmed_restriction 142.113.140.146 (talk) 11:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Where is the ambiguity in that section of Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines? And of course editors are empowered - that is, they have the authority or power - to enforce arbitration decisions. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
17 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
---|
Account creatoredit |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrollededit
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Applying for the right as my edits were rationale. I have undergone all the criterions and I fit in all. I am well aware about Star Missispi and Joe Roe's earlier declines, but now I am fully washed and proved myself eligible for the right. From AFD/CSD to AfC reviews, and developing a handful of drafts for acceptance, I can now proudly say that I am eligible for the role. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowseredit
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to use the tool for making semi-automated edits such as fixing typos, sorting lists, and working with its other features. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 17:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights:
So last night I made over 50-70 edits on the page Jim Cornette in order to hit 500 edits so I can edit more articles about politics because I was limited on what I could edit. Last night I didn't know I was breaking the rules, I found out when an administrator went on my talk page and said I lost extended confirmed status. He also told me I can't be trusted with extended confirmed status because those 50-70 edits weren't genuine. I think I can be trusted, I went over 2 months with making over 400 edits, and throughout those 2 months I haven't been blocked once and most my edits were productive, there were hardly any mistakes so I got hardly any warnings throughout the months. And when I hit 500 edits I edited the page about Hamas, my edits were constructive and I added valuable information and images to the page. I'm here to make pages better, if I get extended confirmed status again there won't be original research, edit warring, or vandalism, I've made hundreds of edits without doing that. So can I be trusted and get my extended confirmed thing back? autowikibrowser rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 00:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmededit |
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmededit
So last night I made over 50-70 edits on the page Jim Cornette in order to hit 500 edits so I can edit more articles about politics because I was limited on what I could edit. Last night I didn't know I was breaking the rules, I found out when an administrator went on my talk page and said I lost extended confirmed status. He also told me I can't be trusted with extended confirmed status because those 50-70 edits weren't genuine. I think I can be trusted, I went over 2 months with making over 400 edits, and throughout those 2 months I haven't been blocked once and most my edits were productive, there were hardly any mistakes so I got hardly any warnings throughout the months. And when I hit 500 edits I edited the page about Hamas, my edits were constructive and I added valuable information and images to the page. I'm here to make pages better, if I get extended confirmed status again there won't be original research, edit warring, or vandalism, I've made hundreds of edits without doing that. So can I be trusted and get my extended confirmed thing back. I didn't know gaming extended confirmed isnt allowed. I had no idea, if I did I wouldn't have did it, I didnt know doing that was a problem, you might say I have to make a few hundread more constructive edits, Ive already made 420-430 of them in the past 2 months. And also it'll probably take a long time to get a few hundred more edits, I'm busy most of the day, I have a job and 3 kids to take care of. HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for file mover |
---|
File moveredit
I would like to apply for the File mover right to rename files. I've been contributing on Commons for quite some time now, and I've been doing lots of good file renaming requests on Wikipedia. The file movers also appreciated my rename requests [10]. I'm a file mover and patroller on Commons, and I've moved over 1000 files so far. I have a good understanding of the renaming guideline, and I think it would be really helpful also having the right here. Thank you! Waqar💬 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page revieweredit
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Applying for a trial period to show my ability as well as to reduce the backlog. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to review some pages—particularly within Wikiprojects SCOTUS and Law. Also, I sometimes help autopatrolled users move drafts to mainspace over existing redirects via WP:RM/TR, and would like to be able to mark those as reviewed. (E.g., this one is yet to be reviewed.) SilverLocust 💬 21:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page moveredit
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting page mover rights to help close discussions at WP:RM, if a consensus is clear. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 03:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I am a registered user with more than 6 months of experience and more than 3000 edits, I moved a lot of pages and have created the Requested move for the page Danilo Guades. (I also don't have blocks).
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes revieweredit
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I watch recent changes often for vandalism and problematic edits, and understand the difference between the two when reverting them. I've also reviewed the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. I hope this right can help me more effectively perform anti-vandal work. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting pending changes review rights to improve my anti-vandalism work here on Wikipedia. I frequently revert instances of vandalism and am willing to assist with pending changes revisions. Thank you. — doclys (❀) 14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I think I could review pending changes every now and then while I'm doing antivandalism patrolling. I've not been as active recently as I wish I was, but I think I can help in some little ways. The Night Watch (talk) 10:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollbackedit
I regularly monitor the "recent change" feed now for about 2 months now, I actively warn users when I revert their edits thanks to twinkle and ultraviolet and actively report the clear vandals and spam accounts. I want to access the rollback rights to make reverting easier as I have slow internet. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Very active in counter vandalism (very likely have over 1000 reverts at this point), have rollback on simple, do X wiki counter-vandalism as well. Think rollback would be helpful. Read and understood WP:Rollback and meet the guidelines above. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editoredit
I have been contributing to Wikipedia for 14 years where I have made numerous edits to templates. When I've wanted to contribute to templates that were protected I have made edit requests which have been successful. I would love to be able to make these edits without the need to provide an edit request. I understand this would be a privilege which I would not abuse. As an editor I have never engaged in edit wars, vandalised any pages or been blocked (except for when I was contributing from a proxy IP which was not due to any actions by me). I believe I fulfil all bar one of the Standard Guidelines for a template editor, the only exception being number 5 as I have not contributed to a template sandbox. I am hoping that this does not affect my request and that my history on here and my willingness to help make my application successful. A current project I am working on: Several flag templates have been recently moved in line with the proper naming convention of templates, however these have not all been updated within other templates creating a template redirect; I would like to contribute by updating templates used on templates to avoid that redirect. Thank you. 6ii9 (talk) 10:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
|