User talk:M.O.X/Archive 15
 | This is an archive of past discussions with M.O.X. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| < Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 > |
| All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - ... (up to 100) |
Ping
User talk:Austex/Donald G. Martin (Austin, Texas)
James - I appreciate your note this morning on my Afc and suggesting that I ask someone to review the draft first and get additional edits first. I had not inended an Afc (my mistake) but rather an effort to ask how to get edits from other editors.
I feel like I am in a never-ending circle here. I've posted everywhere I can think of (including twice each at COIN, FEEDBACK, RFF, and EAR) with no feedback or edits, plus I have a "new unreviewed article" template on the draft article itself. Nothing I do is eliciting edits, yet the Afc note back to me said to get reviews from others. What else should I be doing? I'm not really sure if ther eare otehr places I should be seeking feedback from. I honestly want the help before going through an actual Afc as it is going to be an uphill battle anyway. Thanks. Austex • Talk 12:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
News and progress from RfA reform 2011
RfA reform: ...and what you can do now.
|
|---|
|
(You are receiving this message because you are either a task force member, or you have contributed to recent discussions on any of these pages.) The number of nominations continues to nosedive seriously, according to these monthly figures. We know why this is, and if the trend continues our reserve of active admins will soon be underwater. Wikipedia now needs suitable editors to come forward. This can only be achieved either through changes to the current system, a radical alternative, or by fiat from elsewhere. A lot of work is constantly being done behind the scenes by the coordinators and task force members, such as monitoring the talk pages, discussing new ideas, organising the project pages, researching statistics and keeping them up to date. You'll also see for example that we have recently made tables to compare how other Wikipedias choose their sysops, and some tools have been developed to more closely examine !voters' habits. The purpose of WP:RFA2011 is to focus attention on specific issues of our admin selection process and to develop RfC proposals for solutions to improve them. For this, we have organised the project into dedicated sections each with their own discussion pages. It is important to understand that all Wikipedia policy changes take a long time to implement whether or not the discussions appear to be active - getting the proposals right before offering them for discussion by the broader community is crucial to the success of any RfC. Consider keeping the pages and their talk pages on your watchlist; do check out older threads before starting a new one on topics that have been discussed already, and if you start a new thread, please revisit it regularly to follow up on new comments. The object of WP:RFA2011 is not to make it either easier or harder to become an admin - those criteria are set by those who !vote at each RfA. By providing a unique venue for developing ideas for change independent of the general discussion at WT:RFA, the project has two clearly defined goals:
The fastest way is through improvement to the current system. Workspace is however also available within the project pages to suggest and discuss ideas that are not strictly within the remit of this project. Users are invited to make use of these pages where they will offer maximum exposure to the broader community, rather than individual projects in user space. We already know what's wrong with RfA - let's not clutter the project with perennial chat. RFA2011 is now ready to propose some of the elements of reform, and all the task force needs to do now is to pre-draft those proposals in the project's workspace, agree on the wording, and then offer them for central discussion where the entire Wikipedia community will be more than welcome to express their opinions in order to build consensus. New tool Check your RfA !voting history! Since the editors' RfA !vote counter at X!-Tools has been down for a long while, we now have a new RfA Vote Counter to replace it. A significant improvement on the former tool, it provides a a complete breakdown of an editor's RfA votes, together with an analysis of the participant's voting pattern. Are you ready to help? Although the main engine of RFA2011 is its task force, constructive comments from any editors are always welcome on the project's various talk pages. The main reasons why WT:RfA was never successful in getting anything done are that threads on different aspects of RfA are all mixed together, and are then archived where nobody remembers them and where they are hard to find - the same is true of ad hoc threads on the founder's talk page. |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 15:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Ancient Apparition.
October 2011 Wikification drive
 | Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:43, 25 September 2011 (UTC).
Amazing Grace
I see that you added the two FS versions of Amazing Grace to the article. Thanks for your support. I have two questions:
- Has there been a unified decision from FS on this matter?
- Why the modern interpretations section rather than the "New Britain" tune section?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I don't know if you are watching but Moni3 (talk · contribs) just reverted your addition of the two FS. I am reminding you of the following:
- I have been reverted two times on this issue: [1] and [2] by Moni3.
- Moni sort of WP:OWNs this page and reverts almost any changes to it.
- SandyGeorgia (talk · contribs) sort of backs her up as the WP:FA delegate.
- I previously mentioned this to FS. I think it will take a unified voice of FS to get this sorted out.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello! And what fun!
This is a fascinating approach to adding content to an article. I don't know how M.O.X. found these files, leading to adding them to the article, but they are indeed disputed.
I will be happy to discuss the content of the article with anyone who is interested in improving it. I don't own the article, but I do expect editors interested in improving it to, you know, be interested in improving it, using the highest standards on Wikipedia. This is a Featured Article, after all. The best place for this discussion is at the article talk page. Not here, and not at the talk page of Featured Sound Candidates. M.O.X., feel free to make your commentary there if you disagree with my edit. TonytheTiger clearly already knows the way. --Moni3 (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Regrettably, I will not be participating in the discussion regarding these two WP:FSs because I am topic banned with regard to FS. I should note that WP:FP has very well-established policy regarding the inclusion of its content in articles and FS is surely within its rights to consider general and specific content inclusion in articles. Don't presume that FS people must talk with you on an article talk page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Rights. Granted by a non-profit organization... Sadly, I agree that this is an avenue that seems open to use. Not because it's the right or sensible thing to do, but because as the absolute opposite, people tend to avoid right and sensible as much as possible. --Moni3 (talk) 01:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Could you please stop proxying for TonyTheTiger in areas he is banned from, as you've done over the last few months? That goes against the spirit and intent of any ban; cf. the language at WP:Banning policy on proxying for banned editors. Ucucha (talk) 01:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:25, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiCup 2011 September newsletter
We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by 
Miyagawa (submissions), 
Hurricanehink (submissions) and 
Sp33dyphil (submissions), all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.
If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify's October Newsletter
| |||
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC).
Please comment on Talk:War of the Pacific
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:War of the Pacific. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Adoption candidate
Hello MOX, I'm helping new user user:Stephfo find a mentor. I'm writing you because at the present time he's blocked. If you could take him under your wing that would be great! TTFN – Lionel (talk) 10:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Please comment on Talk:Boris Berezovsky (businessman)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Boris Berezovsky (businessman). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:22, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article Incubator/Zola Levitt
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article Incubator/Zola Levitt. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kingsmill massacre
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kingsmill massacre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
Please comment on Talk:William Lane Craig
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:William Lane Craig. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Judas Maccabeus
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Judas Maccabeus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Please comment on Talk:Jimmy Wales
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Wales. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Notability - how do I fix that?
Hi James Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fanny Eileen Brownbill is my first submission to wiki and I'm a little confused about how to prove notability. The subject truly is notable but how to demonstrate it is proving difficult. Can you advise?
Nicola
user: niccastleman Niccastleman (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- To assert the subject's notability you need to make sure the article meets the notability guideline for politicians and that the article is referenced with the necessary verifiable reliable sources, such as a newspaper, a reliable source is any that is reputable and known for accuracy and high journalistic standard, the latter in the case of newspapers. For help on improving your submission, see referencing for beginners and your first article. Regards, —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:08pm • 09:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
James Thanks for that. In our reference list I believe there are several unimpeachable sources, like newspapers, biographical sources, books and the website for the Parliament of Victoria. We've been forced to use websites which host newspaper archives, rather than online newspapers themselves, since the subject is around 70 years old. The reference list looks far bigger a list compared to the lists provided to sites for other members of parliament around the same era, who, may I say, were far less notable.
Is there a type of source which is missing?
Cheers mate Nicola
Niccastleman (talk) 04:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- There are some issues within the article that are addressed in these guidlines: the Manual of Style entry on article layout and the words to watch guideline. The article needs headings and subheadings where appropriate, but I'll do that for you. It's not yet ready but you've done a good job so far :) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 4:01pm • 06:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tamara Toumanova
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tamara Toumanova. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Fridae'sDoom.
WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is Hurricanehink (submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:
Hurricanehink (submissions)
Sp33dyphil (submissions)
Yellow Evan (submissions)
Miyagawa (submissions)
Wizardman (submissions)
Casliber (submissions)
Resolute (submissions)
PresN (submissions)
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
- The Featured Article Award: Casliber (submissions), for his performance in round 2. Hurricanehink (submissions) matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
- The Good Article Award: Yellow Evan (submissions), for his performance in round 4.
- The Featured List Award: Miyagawa (submissions), for his performance in round 4. PresN (submissions) matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
- The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics): PresN (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
- The Did You Know Award:
The Bushranger (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The In the News Award:
Candlewicke (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews): Wizardman (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.
Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pregnancy
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pregnancy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
FS
I'm not sure if you saw the Signpost or my edit but FS is officially inactive. If you would like to discuss I am open. I just ask you put a note on my talk page if you reply here. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 20:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
This is not a huge issue, but how is Edward Montgomery (Australian politician) unnecessary disambiguation? As far as I can tell he was generally known as "Edward Montgomery" and not "Edward Hugh Montgomery", and the practice is generally to use that name unless there were, say, two Edward Montgomerys who were Australian politicians. Frickeg (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
About Macabre Constant
Hello,
I would like to know more about the verifiability issue of this article.
I've tried to be as objective as possible, including surveys, and references to official material, for instance the AFP journal and a french ministry's official paper!
I don't know what I can do more. Please point me out the right direction.
Cordially, lrq3000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrq3000 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
//Edit: Ok I've reupdated the article after discussing on the live chat on freenode. I hope that it will now be ok for the Wikipedia's standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrq3000 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit comment
Your edit comment associated with this edit to Dennis Ritchie, "formatting: 5x whitespace, 3x nbsp-dash, heading-style", was misleading, as was your marking it as "minor". You also edited out the "found dead" annotation on his death. That's not minor and it's not formatting and, coming from an experienced editor, that's a pretty surprising lapse. The language we have there, stating only that he found dead on a certain date, not stating the exact date of death, is by consensus on the talk page. If you want to change this, you need to get a new consensus. And if you want to make the change, you should not bury it in a misleading edit summary marked as minor. Msnicki (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Be grateful I didn't bury that article in maintenance tags, I removed that annotation because it DOESN'T BELONG in the infobox, look at Steve Jobs' article and the articles of others who have died and you'll see such annotations aren't included, so instead of complaining about one trivial edit go and do something productive. I don't wish to be rude, but arguing about such a trivial change is pointless and a waste of both our times. Another thing, that's not a lapse in judgement. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 3:13pm • 05:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ok my apologies, the found dead should be annotated in parentheses after the reported date in the infobox. Either way, the "b." is extraneous and unnecessary, if he was found dead that date then there may be need for clarification. Pardon my pernicious response. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 3:19pm • 05:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- There's nothing to be grateful for. I don't own the article and neither do you. But the language that was there was as agreed by consensus. If you don't agree, please take it to the talk page. Please don't edit war. If you have good arguments, you should be able to get a new consensus. That's how we decide content here. Msnicki (talk) 06:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know where you got the impression I implied ownership, there's no need to lecture me. I've been editting since June 2010, I know how things work. I'm not edit warring, you're just being adamant. My subsequent edits to the article aren't tendentious, you've already established that consensus was responsible for the wording, however, I'm following convention. The date of birth NEVER has b. for the date of birth, EVER, every biography on living and dead people uses a date range. Consult WP:MOSNUM I mediated a dispute over the use of date formats earlier in the year. Also, you undid my initial edit, however, there was no need to do so for the later edits, they were not, as I said, tendentious and didn't alter the context at all. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 4:50pm • 06:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- There's nothing to be grateful for. I don't own the article and neither do you. But the language that was there was as agreed by consensus. If you don't agree, please take it to the talk page. Please don't edit war. If you have good arguments, you should be able to get a new consensus. That's how we decide content here. Msnicki (talk) 06:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Paul Krugman
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Paul Krugman. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Feedback Dashboard task force
Hi M.O.X.,
Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
Reflink dates
James, thanks for improving the reference citations in a few of the Glee-related articles overnight. However, I was wondering whether it's possible to get the Reflink tool to use the prevailing date format in those citations, which for those articles was clearly mdy. We've been very consistent about using November 9, 2011 rather than 2011-11-09 throughout the articles, both in text and references, which is one of the formats approved by WP:DATESNO, and since it's a US-based TV show and artists, WP:STRONGNAT also applies. (I'm kind of surprised Reflink isn't guided by WP:DATERET.) We do prefer using the same format for the "date" and "accessdate" parameters in the "cite" templates.
BTW, I discovered the hard way that when using a nickname in the header of an article, the quotes around the nickname should not be bolded, even though the rest is. So it's Christopher Paul "Chris" Colfer with unbolded double quotes. (I think it risks an apostrophe shortage in the long run, but that's not my call.) BlueMoonset (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry about that. Yes, although I am one for MOS-compliance, Reflinks isn't programmed to recognise individual date formats, as Reflinks uses a uniform standard, so I apologise forthwith. With regard to the quotation marks, I was unaware of that, thank you for informing me :) I'll remember that for future reference. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:57pm • 02:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Dana Tyler
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dana Tyler. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Input requested
WT:New editor feedback#Proposed office hours. Thanks, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Sydney meetup
You are listed here as interested in Sydney meetups, so I thought I'd let you know about one on this Saturday at 5pm at the Alexandria Hotel. Details here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November_2011. It would be great to see you. --99of9 (talk) 00:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- I gave them a call and they say most of their areas are authorized for kids. --99of9 (talk) 09:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Right then, if time permits I should be able to go, I'll be able to determine whether I can go or not come Friday. Thanks 99of9 :) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:55pm • 09:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, no one thought of this. I do hope you can attend. Tony (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- I can pick you up on the way through if you go to the Gibbon Street side of Redfern Station. About 4.45? Whiteghost.ink 01:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sure thing, do they have a dress code or is summer-wear allowed? —James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:03pm • 02:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'll be in an old greeny sort of car, I think I can park along that street to collect you. Will you be wearing a red/yellow/green/blue shirt or carrying a flag/umbrella? Or anything else identifiable, such as a large hat (in today's weather, more likely :) If we have failed to meet by 5.15, move to Plan B. (Plan B is probably whatever we were going to do anyway.)
- Sure thing, do they have a dress code or is summer-wear allowed? —James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:03pm • 02:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- I can pick you up on the way through if you go to the Gibbon Street side of Redfern Station. About 4.45? Whiteghost.ink 01:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, no one thought of this. I do hope you can attend. Tony (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Right then, if time permits I should be able to go, I'll be able to determine whether I can go or not come Friday. Thanks 99of9 :) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:55pm • 09:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Category talk:Anti-abortion violence
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Anti-abortion violence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Please comment on Talk:Beatrice Rosen
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Beatrice Rosen. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello M.O.X. An editor who was helping to clean up double redirects found one in your user space. It was listed in Special:DoubleRedirects. To fix it, I tried editing User:M.O.X/wikilove.js. This *did* clear it from the list of problems, but now I don't know if it is what you wanted. Please adjust if necessary. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:H.P. Lovecraft
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:H.P. Lovecraft. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
My article Tony Samara
Message added 07:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Christmas' Motto 2011
We need your help. We would be grateful if you would take a few minutes to discuss the nomination for Christmas. The second version is much better, but it is necessary to reach a consensus before approving it.
Thanks and all the best for the upcoming Holiday season! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Feedback Dashboard upgrade
Hi M.O.X.,
Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:51, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Abd al-Rab Mansur al-Hadi
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Abd al-Rab Mansur al-Hadi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to the December Wikification Drive
| | Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts December 1, and you can sign up today! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC).
RFA thank you
Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. By the way... the picture above reminds me of how my own cat will sometimes watch my work. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Greg Pak
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Greg Pak. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Art Pope
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Art Pope. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bernard Madoff
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bernard Madoff. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
WP:ACC/G
Can you explain/direct me to the text you reverted? I couldn't find it. and since this is a guide, common knowledge doesn't count! mabdul 15:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- We shouldn't even begin to create accounts where part or all of the username is forbidden, that is a circumvention of consensus, it should be treated on a case-by-case basis, my edit summary was in error, however, but the titleblacklist is something we've been told to stay away from. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:07pm • 02:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Err, simply no! We create many accounts which are blacklisted! The users are advised to go to ACC if their fav. name is blacklisted. Some are ok to create (kai is at that moment blacklisted - a common name e.g.: in Germany). Account creators have that right not without a reason. We can move pages and create accounts which can't everybody else (except admins). And how should new users to ACC know how to deal with that case? Correct - they should get the advice to defer the ticket to "flagged users" since they simply don't have the power to do it and then a flagged user can decide what to do with that new user. mabdul 19:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe have a look at that ticket... mabdul 15:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- The request you linked to me was NOT a blacklisted (forbidden) name, but one which was similar. I have yet to see any actual evidence that the tbOverride right has been used numerous times as you so claim, because if I'm not mistaken the blacklist contains a list of wildcards contain phrases like "on Wheels", "Fuck" etc. Please do not strain numbers when you have failed to supply any evidence. I mean no offence, as that was not my intention and furthermore new users are generally familiar with the titleblacklist and when I was on IRC (which was for a cumulative period of 5-6 months), I never came across any ACC user who had trouble with a request that conflicted with the titleblacklist. Blacklisted names are blacklisted for a reason, they shouldn't be created except under certain circumstances (ie. where the blacklisted name is part of a larger non-offending username). —James (Talk • Contribs) • 1:26am • 15:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=71117
- http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=69737 blacklisted because of unicode
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Title_blacklist#.2ACom.5Bbp.5D.5B1Il.5Dex..2A_.3Cnewaccountonly.3E
fast check of my knowing ones. Blacklisted names are blacklisted for a reason, they shouldn't be created except under certain circumstances (ie. where the blacklisted name is part of a larger non-offending username). - and how should the "normal"(unflagged user) know what to do in that case(s)? mabdul 16:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- The discussion you linked to asserts my position, it's best not to "delist the entry", ergo accounts of which carry that string should generally be avoided. The request with Greek characters was probably part of the anti-spam filter, as for that other request I have yet to see more than those 2 isolated incidents. I'm willing to hear a third opinion on this from a developer or tool root. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:41am • 01:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=65387 and another one (checking more tickets of me)
- You still haven't explained/showed me where the user is advices to defer the ticket to a flagged user. mabdul 15:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=66403 and another ticket. mabdul 15:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is getting fun: another ticket: http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=68155 mabdul 16:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- another shit user http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=68464 mabdul 16:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- oh shit is a really common part in india. see another ticket http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=68740 mabdul 16:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh it is getting fun for me now: both tickets contain again shit:
- http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=70184
- http://toolserver.org/~acc/acc.php?action=zoom&id=70144
- mabdul 17:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- That's common sense, honestly, if a user didn't know better than to create those accounts if they didn't violate the other rules, then their future on the ACC team needs re-evaluation. Regarding deferral of similar names to flagged users, it's in the section below the section which you originally queried me about. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:55pm • 09:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- The only thing I found was The 'Defer' group allows you to send the request for the attention of a normal user, flagged user, or a checkuser. Defer to flagged users if a user with the accountcreator permission needs to handle the request much wider above. The section below is the section: "Interface administrators" - and even there I don't find it. Please quote the relevant parts for me. I searched now again multiple times the full guide and I'm simply unable to find the parts you are referring to. mabdul 12:39, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- WP:ACC/G#Creating accounts The only instances where the blacklist should be overided is where the offending part of the username is part of a name, such as those examples you showed me. Otherwise, it's be standard practice to AVOID or NOT create the account in question. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:45pm • 13:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- The only thing I found was The 'Defer' group allows you to send the request for the attention of a normal user, flagged user, or a checkuser. Defer to flagged users if a user with the accountcreator permission needs to handle the request much wider above. The section below is the section: "Interface administrators" - and even there I don't find it. Please quote the relevant parts for me. I searched now again multiple times the full guide and I'm simply unable to find the parts you are referring to. mabdul 12:39, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- That's common sense, honestly, if a user didn't know better than to create those accounts if they didn't violate the other rules, then their future on the ACC team needs re-evaluation. Regarding deferral of similar names to flagged users, it's in the section below the section which you originally queried me about. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:55pm • 09:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I believe what mabdul is trying to say is that, in a case where a blacklisted username is fine, there is no problem with creating it. For example, mixed scripts are blacklisted. This is to prevent impersonation (i.e. it should be impossible to create User:Αlphα Quαdrαnt without -tb-override.) However, there are some usernames that are not impersonation attempts. These are perfectly fine to create. Currently, ACC does not flag a request as "Account creator needed" if it is blacklisted. I believe the change to the guidelines was an attempt to make it clear that perfectly fine requests should be deferred, rather than declined. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Something such as this will probably be better in the sitenotice instead of the guidelines, either way common sense would dictate that a user would defer such a request to a flagged user. I'll add it back to the Guide, then. Thanks both of you :) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:08pm • 04:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The Wachowskis
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Wachowskis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
China
Sven is leaving china and you are going there. It seem to be a popular thing among former FS directors :P --Guerillero | My Talk 18:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Emma Willard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Emma Willard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Flavio Briatore
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flavio Briatore. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
  Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Scuba Sites
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scuba Sites. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Thanksgiving
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thanksgiving. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Peter Stanley
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Peter Stanley. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Dead links at GW
Hi- I double-checked some of the dead links at GW, and apparently the tool that you may be using is giving false positives. I've checked one already and will check the others too. Just wanted to let you know! --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Odd... I checked some of those myself. Thanks for revising my work! :) Regards, —James (Talk • Contribs) • 3:40pm • 05:40, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Have a Happy New Year! --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
2012 WikiCup
Hi! As you've previously expressed interest in the competition, I'm just letting you know that the 2012 WikiCup is due to start in less than 24 hours. Signups are open, and will remain so for a few weeks after the beginning of the competition. The competition itself will follow basically the same format as last year, with a few small tweaks to point costs to reflect the opinions of the community. If you're interested in taking part, you're more than welcome, and if you know anyone who might be, please let them know too- the more the merrier! To join, simply add your name to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2012 signups, and we will be in touch. Please feel free to direct any questions to me, or leave a note on the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! You are receiving this note as you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Please feel free to add or remove yourself. J Milburn (talk) 01:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fanny White
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fanny White. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
| Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report
We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
HKSAR passport
{{admin-help}}
Hi James, I've seen that you have merged information from the separate 'Physical features of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passport' article into the main HKSAR passport article. However, I'm wondering whether there is a particular reason you have decided to delete images relating to the current biometric passport version from the main article? (File:Innerpagesrolleduphksarpassport.jpg, File:Uvdatapagehksarpassport.jpg, File:Securityfeatureshksarpassport.jpg, File:Inside32pagehksarpassport.jpg and File:Inside48pagehksarpassport.jpg). I'm not against the merge, I'm just curious as to why you have deleted the existing images of the current biometric passport? Bonus bon (talk) 08:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- That was unintentional, it was a copy-paste merge and I didn't pay close attention to what was lost, and I apologise as such. I'll fix it up, if you haven't already done so. Again, my apologies. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:16am • 16:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- I removed the images from the article as they were deleted from the encyclopedia due to improper licensing. I am not an administrator, also, I believe passports are the legal property of the state or jurisdiction under which they issued, thus the licensing on the existing images is incorrect and said images need to be tagged for deletion until the proper fair use rationale is added, as you yourself do not hold the legal rights to the image and cannot tag them as being CC-BY-SA. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:24am • 16:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am removing the adminhelp tag because not all admin are experts in fair-use copyright guidelines. However, from what I can see, for a number of the pictures they were removed in this edit. I didn't notice if nobody ever questioned the rationale for the other pics, but systemically (purely out of process) any that were no longer used were tagged for deletion after the merge since they were unused and we don't keep unused/orphaned fair-use clients sitting around (since we can't claim that we are fairly using them). I've asked Skier Dude and Δ for their comments as they more versed in this topic than me, and if no luck there I suggest you just ask a fairuse question at Wikipedia talk:Fair_use. 7 09:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was looking for admin intervention. My original intention was to have the images deleted, but that would be circumvention of policy and the seven-day grace period, given this isn't a serious breach of copyright, but a breach nonetheless as I just recalled ALL passports are the legal property of their respective jurisdictions, so FUR is needed. My apologies. I should have clarified and removed the tag. Sorry to have wasted your time 7. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:44pm • 09:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worries. Thanks, 7 09:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was looking for admin intervention. My original intention was to have the images deleted, but that would be circumvention of policy and the seven-day grace period, given this isn't a serious breach of copyright, but a breach nonetheless as I just recalled ALL passports are the legal property of their respective jurisdictions, so FUR is needed. My apologies. I should have clarified and removed the tag. Sorry to have wasted your time 7. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:44pm • 09:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am removing the adminhelp tag because not all admin are experts in fair-use copyright guidelines. However, from what I can see, for a number of the pictures they were removed in this edit. I didn't notice if nobody ever questioned the rationale for the other pics, but systemically (purely out of process) any that were no longer used were tagged for deletion after the merge since they were unused and we don't keep unused/orphaned fair-use clients sitting around (since we can't claim that we are fairly using them). I've asked Skier Dude and Δ for their comments as they more versed in this topic than me, and if no luck there I suggest you just ask a fairuse question at Wikipedia talk:Fair_use. 7 09:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I removed the images from the article as they were deleted from the encyclopedia due to improper licensing. I am not an administrator, also, I believe passports are the legal property of the state or jurisdiction under which they issued, thus the licensing on the existing images is incorrect and said images need to be tagged for deletion until the proper fair use rationale is added, as you yourself do not hold the legal rights to the image and cannot tag them as being CC-BY-SA. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:24am • 16:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Re: Auld Lang Syne
You basically emptied the references in this edit, leaving them with virtually little information than what is required. Your edit summary is also highly inaccurate, although I understand the edit was meant in good faith (as there were minor inconspicuous changes made), however, you seemed to have undone my filling in of the references later fixed in this edit. Please note that cite templates aren't dubious insertions of content or vandalism and be more careful/mindful of this in the future. Thank you and keep up the good work! —James (Talk • Contribs) • 3:00am • 17:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- I've tried very hard to make sense of this - still can't find anywhere where I mught have edited out anything worthwhile, or anything about references for that matter. Could an anomaly about the way different versions are "compared" be producing this impression? Sometimes inserting a space or a break character can produce acres of "red text" that haven't been changed at all. So far as I can see your edits filling in references are in fact intact. It is (alas) possible when reverting to a previous "clean" version after an attack from vandalism (or even well intentioned muddleheadedness) to lose good edits, but if this has happened here I can't actually see where. If good edits of yours have been lost due to this or any other reason then of course this is very much to be regretted - but this is NOT a good time to make serious edits in this article, as this is the time the (naughty words expunged) tend to attack it - often (apparently) in an alchoholic daze. Hope this worry works itself out, anyway, and that you have a good year. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- IF you pay attention to those diffs you'll notice that you emptied the references again and turned them into bare urls. (The {{cite web}} templates got undone. I understand the holiday season is a rowdy one, however, that does not justify making a mistake, although, I don't claim to be perfect as you'll see from my talk page archive, on the contrary I was a problematic editor when I first started editing. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:35am • 00:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry you have got that impression. Its very simply not correct - although I can understand how a "problematic editor" especially one recovering from a "rowdy" season might suppose so. Do take the time to examine the actual versions of the page produced by my edits - as I mentioned wiki "comparisons" can be misleading at times - you get lines of red text that are in fact the same in both versions, but have become disassociated by something irrelevant. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I DON'T edit the article at all, I only did so because the references were bare and because I was unaware of any inherent removal of content. I don't understand how you could misconstrue my statements as you have. I'm simply amazed. IF you actually took the time to look at the revision I linked you'll SEE CLEARLY that the citation template was undone and you reverted the references back to plain, barely titled URLS. Is it that hard? —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:59am • 00:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Won't repeat my explanation again. Please do me the courtesy of reading it. Hope you get over this. When you do, an apology would be appreciated. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I DON'T edit the article at all, I only did so because the references were bare and because I was unaware of any inherent removal of content. I don't understand how you could misconstrue my statements as you have. I'm simply amazed. IF you actually took the time to look at the revision I linked you'll SEE CLEARLY that the citation template was undone and you reverted the references back to plain, barely titled URLS. Is it that hard? —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:59am • 00:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry you have got that impression. Its very simply not correct - although I can understand how a "problematic editor" especially one recovering from a "rowdy" season might suppose so. Do take the time to examine the actual versions of the page produced by my edits - as I mentioned wiki "comparisons" can be misleading at times - you get lines of red text that are in fact the same in both versions, but have become disassociated by something irrelevant. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- IF you pay attention to those diffs you'll notice that you emptied the references again and turned them into bare urls. (The {{cite web}} templates got undone. I understand the holiday season is a rowdy one, however, that does not justify making a mistake, although, I don't claim to be perfect as you'll see from my talk page archive, on the contrary I was a problematic editor when I first started editing. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:35am • 00:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I've tried very hard to make sense of this - still can't find anywhere where I mught have edited out anything worthwhile, or anything about references for that matter. Could an anomaly about the way different versions are "compared" be producing this impression? Sometimes inserting a space or a break character can produce acres of "red text" that haven't been changed at all. So far as I can see your edits filling in references are in fact intact. It is (alas) possible when reverting to a previous "clean" version after an attack from vandalism (or even well intentioned muddleheadedness) to lose good edits, but if this has happened here I can't actually see where. If good edits of yours have been lost due to this or any other reason then of course this is very much to be regretted - but this is NOT a good time to make serious edits in this article, as this is the time the (naughty words expunged) tend to attack it - often (apparently) in an alchoholic daze. Hope this worry works itself out, anyway, and that you have a good year. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
For my sanity I ask you to pay attention to the screenshot: here notice HOW YOU REMOVED CITATION TEMPLATES. I'm not going to bother apologising for you're inability to pick up such a CLEAR removal of content. YOU REMOVED over 1000 characters. MOST OF WHICH were part of said citation templates. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:31am • 01:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ariel A. Roth
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ariel A. Roth. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
!Adoption and !Admin coaching
Hi, user-that-frequently-loses-his-password. I am looking for an experienced user/admin who will look over my shoulder and "whisper words of wisdom". I am not a complete newbie, so maybe adoption is not the right thing and I do not want to become an admin so admin coaching is not the thing. Do you know how I can get to a "mentor / guardian angel" ? With my current SPAccount I only edit cold fusion and related articles. Controversial stuff, the swamps of sadness of WP. --POVbrigand (talk) 20:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:How to improve image quality
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:How to improve image quality. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Your revert at List of countries by external debt
Your edit removed the {{nts}} templates at the leftmost column. However, without the template, the column would not sort correctly. I'm not ready to undo your edit, because you appeared to have changed some other data in the table too. Shuipzv3 (talk) 08:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Demi Moore
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Demi Moore. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 3209 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
Talkback
Message added 03:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
Please comment on Talk:Luciano Laurana
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Luciano Laurana. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits in Microsoft Security Essentials
Hi, James.
Please see Talk:Microsoft Security Essentials § Edits by User:M.O.X.
Regards,
Fleet Command (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 05:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Origin theories of Christopher Columbus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Origin theories of Christopher Columbus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Daemon (computing)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Daemon (computing). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kat Von D
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kat Von D. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
adopt me!
please adopt me!i need help writing my two articles. thanks,--ethen bowen 22:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethen12 (talk • contribs)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Human rights in Estonia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human rights in Estonia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 January newsletter
WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is 
Grapple X (submissions), due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by 
Ruby2010 (submissions), whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is 
Jivesh boodhun (submissions), who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!
The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.
A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.
12george1 (submissions) was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.- 12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
- Sp33dyphil (submissions) was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
- Sp33dyphil (submissions) is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
Speciate (submissions) was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
Jivesh boodhun (submissions) was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.
We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.
A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Communist Romania
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Communist Romania. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kat Von D
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kat Von D. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Future of MOTD
I've decided to start a project discussion on this. Please see WT:MOTD. Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 17:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Late notice Sydney meetup - Wednesday in Newtown
Sorry for the late notice, but Ben Smith, who is a French Wikipedian m:User:benjism89, is visiting Australia with two friends and wants to meet up for dinner in Sydney on Wednesday [tomorrow!]. Feel free to join us :-)
He's staying near Sydney Uni, so: Meet at 7pm at the upstairs bar of the Marlborough Hotel (also known as the "Marley bar") which is about halfway between Sydney Uni and Newtown Train station: http://maps.google.com.au/?q=Marlborough+Hotel&cid=4363433616880529583
From there we'll have a drink and then chose a restaurant.
Please forward this to anyone who you think would be interested.
Sincerely, Wittylama 02:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Religion in Africa
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Religion in Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Rinat Akhmetov
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rinat Akhmetov. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Official Nintendo Magazine
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Official Nintendo Magazine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Neverwinter Nights:Kingmaker
This page was tagged for a merger three years ago, with which you concurred. There is agreement on the talk page; if you still wish this merger I would suggest you go ahead. I have notified Mika1h and Rycr who also wanted this. I suggest you discuss with them how to go about it (what to save, what to ditch, etc) Swanny18 (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March copy edit drive
| Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 22:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Robert Lethbridge
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Robert Lethbridge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Mike Myers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mike Myers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)