Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games

Active discussions
WikiProject Video games (Rated Project-class)
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
WPVG icon 2016.svg WikiProject
Video games
Main page talk
Archives
Threads are archived after nine days.
Guidelines
Manual of Style talk
  Article naming talk
Sources talk
  Search engine
Templates
Wikidata Guide
Departments
Assessment
Reference library talk
  Online print archive
  Sales charts
  Website archive
Newsletter talk
  Current issue Draft
Articles
Article alerts
Article for Improvement
  Voting
Deletion discussions
Essential articles
New articles
Popular pages
Recognized content
  Good article Good content
  Featured article Featured content
Requested articles

viewtalkeditchanges

"Gaming" stragglersEdit

The project seems to have come to a consensus on the phrase "video gaming" in the above discussion but there are still a few stragglers left at User:Masem/gaming list. All of the categories are at CFD and looking for more comments. The remaining are probably legitimate uses of "gaming" in an article title unless people here have objections? If not, I'll remove them from Masem's list as well. The final one I do want to talk about is Category:Video gaming. What exactly is this category for and what do we want it to be for? Category:Video games already exists as the supercategory for the actual games. It looks like Category:Video gaming is supposed to be a very top level supercategory for everything to do with video games, so maybe we could rename it Category:Video games (topic)? Axem Titanium (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

No one has opposed the merge that I've been planning for the "Online gaming in China", so I need to figure out what's needed to complete that merge. For the top level category, I suggest just Category:Video game as to match with Category:Film, Category:Television and Category:Radio, among others in Category:Media formats--Masem (t) 19:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
That would be unnatural English. I believe Category:Video gaming is correct as used for a supercategory. --Izno (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, I mean, yes, that's true and when you look at Category:Entertainment, we have "gaming" and "gambling" there as gerunds, where most other forms of entertainment list the media type.... At least to try to find symmetry with other categories here , a Category:Video game should still be had, but just not necessarily the topic level one we're talking about here. I just feel uncomfortably that we've been moving away from "Video gaming" for this, and are going back to that now... --Masem (t) 19:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
I mean in this situation I think Category:Video games makes the most sense but that category is already being used for individual video games themselves. So Category:Video gaming seems like the best next option as Category:Video game does not really make sense as it is singular. Although, Category:Video game industry could be an option but that is clunky.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 20:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
I think the difference between games and Category:Film, Category:Television, and Category:Radio is that the latter 3 are all implicitly plural when referring to the medium (but use normal plurals when referring to the physical items). I'm still partial to Category:Video games (topic) now that parentheticals are more accepted in category names. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Another possible option, given I think this category should align with other media types is Category:Video games (media). --Masem (t) 22:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
I say we should use Category:Gilm. In all seriousness, I would be support that proposal except I'd go with Category:Video games (medium) over "media". Axem Titanium (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Still need more comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 30 for the CFDs please. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Sort of a side note, but should Health (game terminology) be renamed "Health (video games)"? Popcornduff (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
That article is about a concept in both video games and tabletop games, so that wouldn't work.--AlexandraIDV 12:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Alexandra IDV, good point. But how about just "games" instead of "game terminology"? Popcornduff (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Do we have an article on video game currency?Edit

I mean, I know we have monetization articles, but I'm looking at one that speaks specifically to this. The only reason is that this article about the IRS taxing in -game currency came across my browsing this morning [1] and I feel we need a place for discussing the idea of nominal and premium currency types used in games. (not to document all the different types of fictional currency though examples of gold and gil can be put further). --Masem (t) 17:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

I found this link [2] and [3]. I have no idea how reliable gimitheapp.com is.
There's an article on Virtual economy but I don't know if its tangent to in-game currency. I'm very unfamiliar of the topic. sorry if this was no help.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 17:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
That one works. Needs just a bit of bg to get from Monopoly money to D&D gold to video game things and how that became virtualized. --Masem (t) 19:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I'd also like to have something on "skins" other than redirecting to skins gambling (a section would work). ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I think that would fit into the virtual economy as well, since I would expect skin gambling and loot boxes to be linked from it. But it also needs to discuss things like "premium currencies" and the like, and figuring some historical points of reference. --Masem (t) 20:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I imagine Eve Online would be a good game to mine for sources on. –xenotalk 20:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
There's an article on microtransaction and the {{Video game monetization}} template. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

GT/FT plans for the Sakura Wars seriesEdit

Hello. I've been thinking that we should revisit a potential good/featured topic nomination for the Sakura Wars series, given that we might need to put the article up before or after the worldwide release on April 28. After my potential GA push for Sakura Wars (2019 video game), I plan to take the series as a whole up to a Good topic at least and revise the List of Sakura Wars characters and List of Sakura Wars media for potential GA or FL nominations. The mainline games may also be nominated for FAC at some point later on. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Since it's not out yet worldwide you can at least make a peer review for it to get the GTC out earlier. GamerPro64 02:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Got it. By the way, while I'm still working on a music article in my sandbox and am trying to nominate some articles for FAC status, ProtoDrake has unfortunately decided to bow out of the project. I've already notified WT:SEGA of this discussion. If anyone else who is familiar with the Sakura Wars can help out, that would be great. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
I must say, I’m very impressed with even where everything is right now. It’s amazing you done as much as you have with so many entries stuck in Japan. Sergecross73 msg me 01:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Unless someone objects, I'm probably going to take over the efforts from here and like I said, I've asked around to see what can be done. Meanwhile, as per GamerPro64's suggestion, I've listed the 2019 Sakura Wars for a peer review on this page. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:43, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

TFA plansEdit

Regarding the potential WP:TFA plans, if we do get all six main series articles and the main page for FA status, I propose that we should feature Sakura Wars: So Long, My Love on the 15th anniversary of its release (July 7, 2020), then Sakura Wars 2: Thou Shalt Not Die for its 23rd anniversary (April 4, 2021), Sakura Wars 3: Is Paris Burning? on the 20th anniversary of its release (March 22, 2021), Sakura Wars (1996 video game) and/or Sakura Wars on the 25th anniversary of its release (September 27, 2021) and Sakura Wars 4: Fall in Love, Maidens on the 20th anniversary of its release (March 21, 2022). Any thoughts or suggestions? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Honkai Impact 3rd character listingEdit

Hey, I was wondering (because I'm newish) whether information on the Honkai Impact 3rd about the characters could be partially moved to make stubs for the important characters, and nothing for the minor ones, with only a list of the names (with links) in the original post? DriftWrench2k (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

@DriftWrench2k: You may want to discuss about it at here instead. flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 13:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

MissingNo. FAREdit

I have nominated MissingNo. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Blah2 (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Galaxy ForceEdit

Hey. I'm in the middle of cleaning up Galaxy Force to eventually bring it up to GA status. Right now, I'm a bit confused as to why the article is called "Galaxy Force (video game)"? Looking at the disambiguation page, "Galaxy Force" is also used as subtitles for a certain Transformers and Power Rangers series, but I really don't know why the Galaxy Force game article actually needs to specify it's a video game; neither of those two articles even really mention the "Galaxy Force" subtitle, and doing a Google search for Galaxy Force brings up several results on the front page, all of which relate to the Sega game and not anything else. Any chance this can be fixed? Namcokid47 (Contribs) 23:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Just request the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests (with current Galaxy Force to move to Galaxy Force (disambiguation)). The others are partial matches, none of them have articles and both are Asian only title versions. Google searches bring up only the game's results mostly. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I have filed a RMTR myself, let's see what happens. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposal for new tabEdit

I would like to add a tab to the headers for this WikiProject, to link to the page below, which is a "Town Hall" for allowing communication between different WikiProjects. Is it okay for me to do so? Please feel free to let me know, or to comment. thanks!!

Please note, the page linked to below is merely an example, so that tab header for this page is for a different WikiProject. If implemented, the link would be placed on the specific tab header for this WikiProject, not the one shown below. thanks.

thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 04:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Can you explain a little more? What is a “town hall” in the Wikipedia context? I guess I don’t really follow what sort of inter-WikiProject communication would be going on here? Sergecross73 msg me 05:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
@Sergecross73: it's a spam notice for an idea that doesn't get any traction because it's fully redundant with other venues, like WP:COUNCIL. See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Idea for new community workspace. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

New Articles (February 10 to February 16)Edit

 A listing of all articles newly added to the Video Games Wikiproject (regardless of creation date). Generated by v3.4 of the RecentVGArticles script and posted by PresN. Bug reports and feature requests are appreciated. --PresN 13:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

February 10

February 11

February 12

February 13

February 14

February 15

February 16

Marmalade Game Studio seems COI-ish, no? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I've started a discussion at COI about Marmalade Game Studios, see here. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
And List of Human: Fall Flat speedrunning records seems like it should be prod'd- whole thing is sourced to speedrun.com, no indication of notability beyond that. The box at the bottom says there are 4 other speedrun-by-game articles? Is this a thing now? --PresN 18:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I think that whole lot of speedrun record articles needs to be deleted. That these are games that have speedruns is noted elsewhere and giving an idea of what the fastest known run may be is fair enough there, but we shouldn't be trying to track them. --Masem (t) 18:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
What about Eric Sparrow? A large part of the citations are just "top 10 characters we hate in games" lists, which gives some notability to the character, but is that enough?
I am saying no, just a spot in a list is not enough coverage. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
There was already an AfD on the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Sparrow. Seems like there were similar issues during that discussion as well. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
AfD'ed for a second time. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:26, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 February 2020Edit

In the Gameplay section the following "SHC" should be "SHD":

Once a safehouse is discovered, locations of several SHC tech caches would be revealed. Finding them grants players SHC tech cache points, 138.162.0.42 (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

  Not done Err right page? --Masem (t) 17:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Assuming this is an error in an article for specific game this should be posted on the talk page for that particular game.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games. If possible, please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. If you cannot edit the article's talk page, you can instead make your request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

OpenCritic discussion at WT:VG/SEdit

There is an ongoing discussion about the reliability of OpenCritic at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources#OpenCritic that could use more feedback. Cheers, Axem Titanium (talk) 19:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine + WikiProject Video GamesEdit

Hey everyone, I am from WikiProject Medicine. I am writing to invite anyone here to participate in an WP:RfC at

The situation is that we have been discussing whether and how Wikipedia articles might present the prices of drugs. I looked for where in Wikipedia people have discussed prices, and it seems that posting the price is a recurring issue in video game consoles. I tried to compile a list of prior discussion at

and this includes video games. If anyone knows of more discussions then please add them to that list. Because there is a history of discussion about prices of video games, I wanted to invite this WikiProject to that RfC.

While I am here, I want to thank everyone here for your contributions to Wikipedia's medical content. For people outside of Wikipedia I often have to explain how everyone helps everyone else here, and how by having some collaboration across fields everyone benefits regardless of what they edit. I have watched many well funded medical wikis imagine that they could organize policy and a community and editing by isolating themselves with just medical editors. It never works, because only collaboration and inclusion does. I recently thanked WikiProject Video Games on Wikidata because editors there had developed a policy and best process for a complicated issue there which applied broadly in the field of many WikiProjects. Regardless of how this price thing turns out for medicine, WikiProject Video games contributors are already a big part of its development.

So, thanks, and please comment at the RfC. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

@Bluerasberry: Thanks for the notice. Broadly, I agree with the general sentiment I observed in the RFC that pricing information is a crucial aspect that Wikipedia should cover about drugs due to their influence on health outcomes, accessibility, etc. I'd go so far as to say it's more crucial in this field than it is for video games and game consoles, so my position would be that any guideline you guys develop should probably narrowly focus on drug prices and not try to override larger policies that broadly discourage price information elsewhere on Wikipedia where it's not necessary. Yes, it's noteworthy that average video game prices jumped by $10 with the launch of PS3/Xbox 360 and also that the PS4 outsold the Xbox One due in no small part to its cheaper price. Listing every local price for every individual video game is not warranted.
That said, this is an enormous RFC and I'm having trouble figuring out how best to convey these comments in a way that would be useful to the people who would be assessing it. Do you have any advice? Axem Titanium (talk) 21:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
@Axem Titanium: Thanks for trying to understand the issues.
You could just copy what you said here to that page. The best kind of comment here, as in many cases, says something to more than one perspective, like "this is good for this reason but also problematic like the other side says". Saying where you typically edit helps, and a comparison to video games or any other context is helpful.
In general, I think bringing traditionally unrelated perspectives together makes Wikipedia better and more robust. There is no way to go wrong with just posting. No one is under obligation to read all the background. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
This is not a neutral message and falls afoul of canvassing. Further, the RFC is not about NOT in general, it is about the use of very specific sources for drugs. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
It was not my intent, if I am in error then I apologize, I have answered the complaint at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles/RFC_on_pharmaceutical_drug_prices#Invited_WikiProject_Video_Games_to_comment, please excuse me. In general, thanks WikiProject Video Games. I intended to be helpful and anticipated no controversy, but will go with the judgement of that RfC's moderators to fully state apology if I am in error. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Video game article reassessment backlog needs attentionEdit

So, I flagged a couple video game articles for reassessment (Dirt Rally 2.0 and Playsaurus), and noticed that there isn't much attention to that category. I don't feel that I should do this task myself, so if anyone who reads this is able to help in this area, I would greatly appreciate it. "Category:Wikipedia video game articles for reassessment" is the category. Thanks, King of Scorpions 21:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I reassessed those two at least.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
For the record, there's nothing wrong with reassessing articles you yourself worked on if you feel confident in doing it - ratings are not super strict (they are a tool for editors rather than a part of the encyclopedia proper) and are largely based on any one editor's interpretation of the article, so as long as you're not calling stubs B-class or w/e you're probably fine. I reassess articles I work on all the time.--AlexandraIDV 22:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me! King of Scorpions 18:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Cleaned out the category... will continue to keep watching it for new articles. King of Scorpions 19:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Music article proposalsEdit

I'm thinking about creating potential articles pertaining to the Fire Emblem series, titled Music of the Fire Emblem series. Any thoughts or objections? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

No objections from me.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 19:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Can someone help me improving a draft page?Edit

I would ask for helping me helping the draft page List of fictional wars. Anyone? Dannyguns (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Gonna be honest: this is unlikely to work, it's a bit of how Wikipedia was designed in 2006 that WP has since moved away from. If a fictional war is notable enough for an article, like Galactic Civil War, then work on improving / writing that specific article, and maybe create a category if there are more fictional wars with their own article than I suspect. If it's notable but not enough for a stand-alone article, then make a referenced section of either the fictional work it's a part of, or whatever spinoff article already exists on the setting / plot of that work. If it's not notable, then don't write about it at all. Basically, when such fictional elements are notable, they're notable for the work they are part of; a list that is a conglomeration of totally unrelated wars(/other fictional elements) across works that happen to all be wars (all share the same fictional element) is frowned upon, as it's not clear why these are all jammed into the same article. This doesn't apply only to fiction; you'll see it for real-world topics too, where Wikipedia has tried to move away from something like List of saviors and instead have separate articles for Messiah, Madhi, Saoshyant, Dashavatara, etc. which are really not actually related to one another, and thus having a single article that claims they're all the same thing would be weird. SnowFire (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Good advice is to always look for any cultural impact in the real world before making articles focused on fiction.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 16:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Hate to pile on, but yeah, I can’t imagine this meeting Wikipedia’s notability requirements. Reliable sources aren’t frequently covering that subject separate from the games themselves. You’re free to try in the draft space, but it’s not something I’d pursue, sorry. Sergecross73 msg me 17:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
WP:WAF is where the formalized info lives. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 19:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry, thanks. Anyway we have a list of fictional BEARS! So why should we have a list of fictional wars? Wars are important in human culture... Dannyguns (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

@Dannyguns: Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. Those lists that you are looking at may not be the best example to follow and could potentially be removed if challenged.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 14:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

More restrictions on List of fictional elementsEdit

I made a new discussion in WT:Notability (fiction) regarding adding more restrictions on lists regarding fictional elements such as swords, animals, profession, and so on. if anyone is interested in bringing their opinion on the topic. here.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 18:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

On VGs and the coronavirusEdit

I was thinking about making some page about how the coronavirus outbreak is affecting the vg market, but felt something like that's a huge "1st world problem" nonsense if it was by itself. (there's no clear evidence of it yet, but it *might* affect the release of the next consoles, something that MS nor Sony would want to admit, but which would have a bit impact if it happened). But I got a flash of inspiration and set up a section on the 2020 in video games specifically on impacts on the VG sector from the conoravirus. If you see anything else like that, it would help to build that out. --Masem (t) 21:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, taking a longer view, I think the coronavirus impact on games is a storm in a teacup compared to the things that Actually Matter. A section in 2020 in video games was the right move. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Yeah, as I first started reading your comment, I was going to recommend adding it to the year in video games article, as that’s how I handle similar things in the music world that could be seen as an unnecessary spinout. It’s nice to see some prose there too, when they’re commonly just release schedules and list bloat. Sergecross73 msg me 21:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Prose in the YYYY in video games articles becomes easier after the year is over, once we can talk with 20/20 hindsight. eg financial performance, significant events beyond just the table, etc. But like, I know we had the that Impact of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on the video game industry which is a bit different case and I can see the reasons for the standalone there, but the coronvirus is such a different matter and "Complaining" about VG effects feels completely wrong, but from an encyclopedic standpoint, this is having documentable effects. --Masem (t) 22:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
As much as I like that article, it feels increasingly self-indulgent in hindsight. I think it could use a trim and a hard consideration of merging into 2011 in video games. It's always good to remember that things can be newsworthy without being notable. Dunno if it's appropriate to ping User:Abryn who's on wikibreak right now. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
We could always make relevant parts as part of 2011 in video games in the same manner. There's certainly parts to document. --Masem (t) 22:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
That article embarrasses me. I knew why I was being pinged when I saw the header lol. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 01:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hey, at the time, it seemed okay, but I think all of us have matured a bit particularly in light of this coronavirus. I am going to assume this is your blessing to merge in down? :) --Masem (t) 01:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Be my guest, haha. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 01:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

I tagged Impact of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on the video game industry in Wikidata d:Q17042367 as "instance of disaster". That means that it shows up on the list at humanitarian data in its time, something like this automated report from the past 90 days. Disasters happen and will continue to happen, and any documentation is helpful. Video games are at the forefront of society and not a fringe topic, so if anyone can detect a statistical trend about video game sales and makes a claim that this is a result of a disaster, then that is useful information. This Wikipedia article only summarizes what reliable sources say and is not a narrative with origins in the Wikipedia community. I think it is great. I know nothing about the field of consumer trends, but considering the size of the video game market, it seems plausible to me that video game industry activity could be an economic indicator of the impact of other events. If editors here wish to curate this kind of content and perspective then I say do it. Merge if there is consensus. I see there is hesitation here and at that article's talk page, but I think the sourcing and idea is clever and the article could stand. Health professionals have a tendency to follow tradition and when new data can tell new stories, the people narrowly in health may not acknowledge signals from other sectors. Editors of the article are citing a great mix of mainstream general news sources, mainstream video game news sources, and specialized publications. I think this is great content and if anyone wants to do more of this then they should. If anyone here ever wants feedback on this kind of content then feel free to visit WikiProject Medicine or one of the other projects and ask for comments. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Using online manuals as sourcesEdit

While I'm still working on the Sakura Wars (2019 video game) article using this online instruction manual from Sega, I have a question: should we include an online manual's page numbers in the citation template or not? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:27, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

If its a short manual, its not required. Anything more than say 40-50 pages, I would include. The idea is, how much effort does it take the reader to confirm the citation assuming they have access to the right version of the work. Having them read a 20 page manual is trivial, but a 50 page may not be. --Masem (t) 01:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
In this case, the digital instruction manual is about 30 pages long. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Then I would say yes, it can't hurt. --Masem (t) 05:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Possible FA push for YakuzaEdit

I'm thinking about getting Yakuza (video game) up for FA status so we can feature it as a WP:TFA on December 8, 2020 (the 15th anniversary of the series), using the Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest FAs as models. There are a few problems: we may need some more sources, especially in the gameplay section. I'm also concerned about the possibility of dead citations as well. The ultimate goal is to get the Yakuza main series a good or featured topic should we get all seven articles up to GA or FA. Any thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Can someone help me in "Category:Unassessed video game articles"?Edit

I'm working in this category, rating video game articles, but there's still over 60 articles left. Could someone help me with this task? Thanks, King of Scorpions 19:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

  • I did a few, and nice, all cleaned out already.--AlexandraIDV 21:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me! It would have taken me forever otherwise... King of Scorpions 21:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Return to the project page "WikiProject Video games".