User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 59
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 39
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 83
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 14
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 150
Requested RD1 redactions 1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 6
Open sockpuppet investigations 183
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

edit

Reports

edit

User-reported

edit
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 1
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

edit
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

edit
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Severe accusations not covered by RS. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: As soon as protection expires, anonymous IP edits adding un- or poorly-sourced material is added (probably by the subject) so the page goes back to looking like a resume. This has been going on for many years; please consider permanently protecting it or nominating for deletion (subject is not notable) Xblkx (talk) 00:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. They are changing box office backed by reliable sources several times in month. As I can't be available everytime I can't revert them right on time. Needs longer time protection. Mehedi Abedin 02:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism i.e. removal of data TheProEditor11 (talk) 04:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Note to admin: This is a bad request to restore unconstructive content and enforce their version. The user is treating Wikipedia as a directory of listings, and adding largely unsourced content with WP:FAKE references, not to mention unreliable blog-like sources like legodesk.com.--2409:4073:4E39:D390:41DE:C49B:4BBB:61A0 (talk) 07:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism over several years; repeated temporary protection only stops it temporarily. Some of the edits may be well-intentioned, but they almost all come from new or inexperienced editors seeking to "cleanse" the article of blasphemy against Islam for asserting that a pre-Islamic goddess was worshipped as a wife or daughter of Allah. Similar edits are also regularly made at the companion articles Manat and Al-Uzza. Would suggest indefinite extended confirmed protection of all three, since it is apparent that the same kind of edits will be repeated as long as it is possible to do so. P Aculeius (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

If there are multiple editors who are editing in the same exact thing, then it is probably sockpuppetry. 74.14.6.233 (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I don't think it's one person using sockpuppets. It's likely that some of the edits involve sockpuppetry, but while the edits are all aimed at denying that such a goddess existed or was worshipped or was regarded as the wife or daughter of Allah, or asserting that she was "fake" or a "demon", etc. they are carried out in a variety of ways, sometimes adding words, sometimes deleting them, frequently arguing through their edit summaries that what the article said prior to their edits was wrong, sometimes citing the Qur'an, sometimes not using the summary, sometimes pretending to be fixing a typo, etc. The last person was an IP editor who edited all three articles similarly; the one before that was a registered user with no other edits; the three before that were all IP's; while the page was partly protected in December it was the site of edit warring initiated by a registered user with no previous edits to other articles, who was eventually blocked with a total of 12 edits over three weeks' time. The one thing they all have in common is that they all seem to be offended by any version that neutrally describes pre-Islamic beliefs that are inconsistent with Islam, or fails to describe those beliefs as false or heretical or blasphemous. P Aculeius (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of copyrighted material by IPs going back to 2022. Some of these are obviously good faith additions, and some of them included material cited to a news article while really being copied from press releases, so I think there's multiple editors involved. History has been mostly revdelled, so I'm sorry I can't be more specific or warn the IPs better.

NB, one or two sentence copyvios rarely set off copypatrol or the copyright bot. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting preferably semi-protected status for this page. Persistent (years long) low-quality (even if GF) IP edits which significantly undermined the quality of the article. The grammar in particular was unacceptably awful prior to me embarking on an informal project to fix it last week, far beneath the quality we should expect for a major religion. Finally, it appears to be the norm for articles on major religions to be semi-protected. JDiala (talk) 08:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Continuous editing war between non-logged-in users over the result even though it is a Polish victory, and I ask for a low level of security so that only those logged in can edit Birczenin (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It doesn't help the community that this almost fifteen year-old article is completely uncited. At this point the entire page represents the opinions of the various ip contributors, not the analysis of reliable sources. BusterD (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: high lvl of IP vandalism on her birth year AvaBrandon2000 (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Greparty (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP editor seems to be constantly removing reliable sources from the article, in an attempt to whitewash the party's image to make the party looks more moderate. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 10:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Proxy-using vandal on a little crusade, using incredibly abusive edit summaries. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: An IP user has vandalized few pages, including Floriano Peixoto, a page whicj was just protected. Several of their IP socks, particularly those in Floriano Peixoto, warned by me and other users. Similarly, they continue to engage in the same behavior on On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences. I can't assume good faith at this point. Auzandil (talk) 12:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 45.238.113.186 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy🍁 12:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk template or module. Now redirected from semi-protected {{zhi}}. Remsense 12:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced additions of BO figures. The page was protected multiple times in past. Should go for longer duration now. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA enforcement. GnocchiFan (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 13:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. So far, none of the socks have made it to auto-confirmed status. Favonian (talk) 14:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated changing of the badge and flag to the Charles III version. As of 26/06/2024, this change is still not in use. This has been confirmed by the Metropolitan Police Service themselves, through a Freedom of Information request which may be viewed here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9523b6w6x2qcvnha4w85y/FULL-DISCLOSURE_01-FOI-24-038550.pdf?rlkey=6zo7wvmkjfy71elyyvy01e80y&st=moksunea&dl=0. I request this page be protected to some degree until such time an official change of the badge/flag is announced in order to prevent any further misleading changes. ProfAuthor (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: A user keeps on adding Israel to the list when there is no source indicating the opening of an Israeli embassy or Indonesia recognizing Israel. Even if he did show a reference in one of his edits, the word "embassy" is nowhere to be seen. Underdwarf58 (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Same reason as before. A user keeps on adding Israel to the list when there is no source indicating the opening of an Israeli embassy or Indonesia recognizing Israel. Even if he did show a reference in one of his edits, the word "embassy" is nowhere to be seen. Underdwarf58 (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Little vandalism in the article's introduction. Migsbasinillo (talk) 15:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Much disruptive editings in the last one hour Wår (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

edit
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: The extended confirmed protection is no longer necessary because the autoconfirmed vandalism-only account that vandalized the page in October 2022 probably won't come back to this article. I would suggest reducing it to semi-protection or unprotecting the page entirely. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Whoops, I did not discuss with the protecting admin first. I did not see that note until after submitting this. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Well, you still haven't notified him, so now I shall have to do so. @Cryptic: how say you? Favonian (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: This page was semi-protected in 2013 for sockpuppetry, but I think the sockpuppet has likely been gone for years and the user who protected it has been inactive for 4 years, so I think removing the protection from the page or at least downgrade it to pending changes is necessary. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:DC19:1DFF:FEB0:A9C2 (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected I see that Mark Arsten has not edited since 2020. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The page has been blanked completely and it now an article on Wikipedia and now it is made into a user sandbox now by Fishsicles directly and thus it is longer necessary to keep this, and so, hence i request this article to be given pending changes instead now itself. 59.93.2.87 (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Not unprotected – OP blocked. The page is protected because of this user's antics, Favonian (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

edit
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

edit

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

3 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box/fmbox.css (request) 2024-06-25 04:53 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Rent control in the United States (request) 2024-06-27 15:39 Fully protected, expires 2024-07-03 at 19:40:19 UTC (log) Modified by Daniel Case on 2024-06-26: "upgrade to full for duration since no one's been using the talk page"
User:Ig2000 (request) 2024-06-30 03:57 Fully protected (log) Protected by Acalamari on 2014-02-26: "Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Deceased_users"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
15 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Gallery/styles.css (request) 2024-06-10 16:38 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2021-05-06: "Highly visible template: match parent"
Module:Road data (request) 2024-06-11 17:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Lectonar on 2023-05-30: "High-risk template or module"
Module:Lang/data (request) 2024-06-11 18:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Trappist the monk on 2017-12-13: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox legislative election (request) 2024-06-16 19:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Number 57 on 2020-04-13: "High use template, recent additions messing things up"
Template:Canadian party colour (request) 2024-06-19 02:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by MSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Ahnentafel (request) 2024-06-24 19:59 Template-protected (log) Protected by Primefac on 2018-04-27: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Designation (request) 2024-06-25 03:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox political party (request) 2024-06-29 20:19 Template-protected (log) Modified by Plastikspork on 2016-04-16: "Recent malformed edits"
Template:Inflation/year (request) 2024-06-30 03:13 Template-protected (log) From Template:Inflation-year: Protected by Zzuuzz on 2016-10-21: "High risk template 11k+ transclusions"
Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2024-06-30 03:19 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 09:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

edit

Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)

 Not done, sorry. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wacotron looks like it's heading for deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtaxation of the United States was not that long ago. – Joe (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
@Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle (talkcontribs) 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
You don't see an issue with the NPP is a paramilitary organization comment then? – Joe (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

edit


Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights :

I would like to have the AutoWikiBrowser/JavaScript Wiki Browser to make edits faster to fix redirects for the correct names of railway stations and also to make faster edits for updating adjacent stations due to the renaming of some railway services in Switzerland. Swiss512 (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:NOTBROKEN this is not a good use of AWB. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to cancel my request. Thanks Swiss512 (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Marking  Request withdrawn for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I want to use AWB to replace raster graphics with vector graphics. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 19:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I am requesting AWB rights to fix spelling mistakes, more specifically names without accents, such as Raul Castro (Supposed to be spelt Raúl Castro) as seen in these pages Raul Castro and I often copy edit random pages and AWB would make these accent fixes and copy editing small grammar mistakes easier and more efficient, Wiiformii (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I've previously had rights to AWB, however I had them removed due to being inactive on Wikipedia. I'd like to have these rights applied again to complete edits on album articles.--Majash2020 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) Majash2020 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([3]). MusikBot talk 01:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. I previously had AWB permission, but it was revoked due to inactivity. I would like to request access to it again to continue my works. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 17:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([4]). MusikBot talk 17:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am requesting access to the AWB to make typo correction, categorization, and other readability improvements a much quicker and easier process. I meet the 500 mainspace edits requirement, and my recent work with AfC and Ultraviolet demonstrates that I can use powerful tools responsibly. Garsh (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

edit

Dear Wikipedians: I'm a Brazilian user with a good grasp in Inkscape who is looking forward to help converting some raster images from the following page to SVG: Images that should be in SVG format

My main interested in that is both to contribute to Wikipedia and to get more experience with vectorial illustrations. However, I cannot upload SVG versions in those images file history because my account is not autoconfirmed (it has less than 10 edits in EN Wikipedia, even though I have more than that in PT Wikipedia).

I'm asking for the "confirmed" flag because I'll probably never do 10 or more edits in EN Wikipedia articles, mainly because I have good reading skills in English, but I'm at "base level" writing in that language. Rmesrmes (talk) 01:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@Rmesrmes: you should be able to upload these images to Commons in most cases as most of the source images appear to have acceptable licensing. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Convert to SVG and copy to Wikimedia Commons is the best place to start, you will be able to both get the experience you want, improve the images, and make them widely available to hundreds of other projects! — xaosflux Talk 14:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the input, Elli and xaosflux! I'll work through those images! I've also found another similar list at Wikimedia Commons here [5]. I believe both of those links solve my problem. Thanks! Rmesrmes (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done per above not needed. — xaosflux Talk 17:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

edit

Requesting extended-confirmed for my mobile account to match my main one. Rollback & pending changes not really necessary, but would like to be able to fix errors I spot on the go. Thanks! jellyfish  03:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Confirming from mobile that this is me. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 03:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Met all criteria Scoria. (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response) by Scoria.. MusikBot talk 12:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

edit

It's been a long time! I'm reaching out to request access to MMS permissions again, which were revoked due to inactivity. I'd like to continue working on my previous projects. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 12:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

edit

I believe I'm capable of reviewing new articles and drafts. Check my global contributions and user rights. Though this specific user group doesn't exist on ptwiki, my first-language/native Wikipedia, I believe I have potential in helping others creating articles and filtering enwiki. I have the draftify script installed and knowledge with policies. I've been working and have created some articles, such as Sapphism, Asexual flag, Plurisexuality, and Lists of LGBT politicians, as it shows, I have interest in sexuality area, as well as lists, categories, and redirects, as shown in my edits. --MikutoH talk! 00:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done, thank you for volunteering. signed, Rosguill talk 13:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work in reviewing new pages. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 20:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting NPP rights to be able to help out with reviewing new pages and to potentially help fix new pages. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I would like to request an extension of my temporary NPP rights. Though I haven't been as active as I expected, I still reviewed some articles and participated in the May drive (thanks for the barnstar). I enjoyed the experience and would like to continue helping out whenever I can. Thanks for considering my request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 08:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\

I was given a two-moth extension about two months ago, and I wanted to apply now for full-time approval to be a new page reviewer. I have been active in AfDs, and, as suggested in my temporary approval last time, I have reviewed many more pages than the first two months of my reviewership. All of the AfDs I have created have spawned genuine discussion, and I have also approved several new pages that pass the standards of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. I feel as though I have done enough to earn full-time approval, but I would appreciate any approval the admins are willing to give. I enjoy this work, and I enjoy helping clean up Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Anwegmann (talk) 00:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 00:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I want to contribute to Wikipedia in good sense and review new pages which provides good information regarding to the topic Dr.AyushBhardwaj (talk) 09:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I have made more than 8,500 edits as an editor over a time period of around 8 months. As per my request, I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work reviewing new pages. In addition to currently serving AFC Services, I am aware of Wikipedia policies such as WP:GNG, WP:BEFORE, WP:TOOSOON, WP:SIGCOV etc. I spend a lot of time understanding Wikipedia, and overall, I have learned a lot about Wikipedia policies. Thank you with warm Regards! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

In reviewing your editing history and considering concerns brought to my attention by other editors, I see several indications of problematic editing that at best suggest an inability to identify unreliable sources, and at worst covert UPE.  Not done. signed, Rosguill talk 13:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I am confident in my ability to review new articles and drafts, as evidenced by my global contributions and user rights. Some of the articles I have worked on and created include "Biniverse: The First Solo Concert," "Cherry on Top," and "Kyedae," among others. I believe I have the potential to make a valuable contribution as a page reviewer. Acrom12 (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

edit


Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and the five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

edit

I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

I help with reverting vandalism, and have also read up on Wikipedia's policies on what content would be generally allowed here. -- Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 12 days. MusikBot talk 00:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Active in vandalism fighting, already have rollback rights. I would like this tool because I do patrol some high-traffic protected pages, e.g. Mount Rushmore, for WikiProjects I'm involved in. TCMemoire 15:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 15:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

edit

Reason for requesting rollback rights: i have some experience reverting changes via Special:RecentChanges and i always warn users of reverts i make to their changes where possible, wether this be via RedWarn or via Twinkle.

I think this could benefit me with reverting changes and have much less hassle with it all. JoBo Gamer (contribs) 11:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 79 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 13:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Please see the notice at the top of this page; with only 79 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have the necessary editing experience for advanced permissions. Take a moment to check out CVUA, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Thanks, Fastily 00:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
ok, cheers JoBo Gamer (contribs) 09:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello; I had rollback until I resigned in March because of lack of need. That said, I have recently ran into situations where this right would be helpful and I would like to get back into the flow of using Huggle and related tools again. Cheers, Queen of Heartstalk 23:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done DanCherek (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
    Admin statistics
    Action Count
    Edits 43303
    Edits+Deleted 43878
    Pages deleted 1710
    Pages restored 10
    Pages protected 37
    Protections modified 1
    Users blocked 121
    Users reblocked 3
    Users unblocked 3
    User rights modified 1
    Users created 1

    Ben MacDui (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

    Clean-up

    edit
    • New Pages
    • Speedy
    • {{notenglish|Spanish}
    • {{notability|organizations}
    • {{unreferenced}
    • {{Views needing attribution|date=}
    • {{Unreferencedsection|date=}

    Anti-vandal tools

    edit
    • {{Vandal|username}
    • {{IPvandal|no}


    Click here to show warnings
    Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents.
    Don't forget to substitute these templates (more information)
    Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 4im
    Editing tests {{subst:uw-test1}} {{subst:uw-test2}} {{subst:uw-test3}} Escalate ↓ Escalate ↓
    Vandalism {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} {{subst:uw-vandalism2}} {{subst:uw-vandalism3}} {{subst:uw-vandalism4}} {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}}
    Page blanking, removal of content or templates {{subst:uw-delete1}} {{subst:uw-delete2}} {{subst:uw-delete3}} {{subst:uw-delete4}} {{subst:uw-delete4im}}
    Adding spam links {{subst:uw-spam1}} {{subst:uw-spam2}} {{subst:uw-spam3}} {{subst:uw-spam4}} {{subst:uw-spam4im}}

    Other tools

    edit