User talk:Abductive/Archive 18

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,473   Binomial nomenclature (talk) Add sources
235   Spondias purpurea (talk) Add sources
97   Wordbee (talk) Add sources
24   Saint Peter, Barbados (talk) Add sources
401   Golf (card game) (talk) Add sources
21   Saint Lucy, Barbados (talk) Add sources
4,256   Me Too movement (talk) Cleanup
54   Reactions to the Special Counsel investigation (2017–2019) (talk) Cleanup
4   Roman Catholic Diocese of Innsbruck (talk) Cleanup
4,589   Vancouver (talk) Expand
266   Tyrol (talk) Expand
23   Index of Barbados-related articles (talk) Expand
48   2006 Royal Air Force Nimrod crash (talk) Unencyclopaedic
66   Pseudo-anglicism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
30   Chhibber (talk) Unencyclopaedic
507   Perennial philosophy (talk) Merge
18   Ziziphus mucronata (talk) Merge
98   Aztec architecture (talk) Merge
114   Entomopathogenic fungus (talk) Wikify
437   Saxony-Anhalt (talk) Wikify
7   Phryni (talk) Wikify
19   Integration Bee (talk) Orphan
3   Philipp Sarlay (talk) Orphan
3   Michael A. Sutton (talk) Orphan
4   Adam Tanner (Jesuit theologian) (talk) Stub
2   Joel Scherban (talk) Stub
9   Blind cave eel (talk) Stub
20   Guy A. Lepage (talk) Stub
3   Capricorn lizardfish (talk) Stub
7   Troglomorphism (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Influenza A virus subtype H3N2

Hi, I know this is insanely old, but I was wondering if you could help track down a source for the claim you modified in this edit? I'm trying to find data on the relative prevalence of H3N2 versus H1N1, and while it does seem to me that H3N2 has become more common I am having trouble finding a reliable source that specifically states as much. Your edit appears to have been primarily to remove a chunk of other irrelevant text, but at the same time you modified the original claim to its current state (which has remained unchanged for many years now — but also unsupported by any references.) Thanks, Wclark (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

I couldn't find any source that came out and said that directly, so I rephrased. The new phrasing should at least show that H3N2 predominates in some years. Abductive (reasoning) 01:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Unfortunately I'm actually looking for references to back up the original phrasing (that H3N2 is becoming more prevalent) ... but that's my problem, not one with the article :) --Wclark (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
You have to understand; from the CDC's perspective, a whole year is only one datapoint. So they can't say it's becoming more predominant. Abductive (reasoning) 01:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Xifeng Wu) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Xifeng Wu.

User:Winged Blades of Godric while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

My bad, apologies for the previous unreview:-( Too many tabs and selecting the wrong one ...

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WBGconverse 09:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
8   Institute of Biosciences and Technology (talk) Add sources
15   KSS Design Group (talk) Add sources
129   Abu Nuwas (talk) Add sources
1,628   Baghdad (talk) Add sources
62   Hindu temples in Varanasi (talk) Add sources
2,152   Jimmy Savile (talk) Add sources
23   Persian Inscriptions on Indian Monuments (talk) Cleanup
237   Ghats in Varanasi (talk) Cleanup
943   Great Mosque of Kufa (talk) Cleanup
595   Stade Rennais F.C. (talk) Expand
37   Iceland Stock Exchange (talk) Expand
52   Denny Tamaki (talk) Expand
14   Geophysical Service (talk) Unencyclopaedic
385   Rashidun (talk) Unencyclopaedic
215   Habib Bourguiba (talk) Unencyclopaedic
51   Abd (Arabic) (talk) Merge
77   Qatar–Saudi Arabia relations (talk) Merge
68   Energy homeostasis (talk) Merge
4   Hyptis brevipes (talk) Wikify
914   Mohammed VI of Morocco (talk) Wikify
272   En Avant de Guingamp (talk) Wikify
4   Kathleen Harris (talk) Orphan
2   Elizabeth Fontham (talk) Orphan
2   Naoto Ueno (talk) Orphan
4   Kópavogur College (talk) Stub
8   Mazghuna (talk) Stub
36   Rue des Rosiers (talk) Stub
5   Charles LeMaistre (talk) Stub
96   Dermacentor (talk) Stub
2   Prunus spicata (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Leslie Leve DYK

Abductive (talk · contribs) Please see the updated hook and information for the Leslie Leve DYK nomination. Thanks. QuakerSquirrel (talk) 14:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
356   Prunus serotina (talk) Add sources
5   Casa Guazzoni (talk) Add sources
95   Prunus subg. Cerasus (talk) Add sources
1,330   Cherry blossom (talk) Add sources
1,706   Peach (talk) Add sources
2,280   Almond (talk) Add sources
368   Prunus spinosa (talk) Cleanup
168   Old Town, Chicago (talk) Cleanup
17   Todd Boyd (talk) Cleanup
63   Hamdanid dynasty (talk) Expand
23   Telecommunications in Jamaica (talk) Expand
1,697   University of California, Los Angeles (talk) Expand
6   Wallace T. Miller, Jr. College of Business (talk) Unencyclopaedic
36   Ashburn, Chicago (talk) Unencyclopaedic
695   Public school (United Kingdom) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
10   Operation Caban (talk) Merge
6   Climate of Nawabshah (talk) Merge
585   Pagoda (talk) Merge
71   History of Milan (talk) Wikify
5   Taaitta Toweett (talk) Wikify
15   Lafayette Square Mall (talk) Wikify
3   Gholamreza Ghodsi (talk) Orphan
2   John Culliney (talk) Orphan
6   Almond production in Afghanistan (talk) Orphan
13   Carl Friedberg (talk) Stub
47   Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A (talk) Stub
7   Piazza San Babila (talk) Stub
57   Curcuma aromatica (talk) Stub
373   Ulawun (talk) Stub
3   Bernhard Adalbert Emil Koehne (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  •   Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  •   Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  •   SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  •   Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

June 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

 
June 2019—Issue 003


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Masked booby by Casliber and Aa77zz, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Rook (bird) by Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by J Milburn
  Vernonopterus by Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Campylocephalus by Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Unionopterus by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Ashorocetus
  Big Cat, Little Cat by Barkeep49, reviewed by J Milburn
  Félicette by Kees08, reviewed by Nova Crystallis

Newly nominated content

  Masked booby by Casliber
  Adelophthalmidae
  Plains zebra by LittleJerry
  Letter-winged kite by Casliber



Relative WikiWork
Project name Relative WikiWork
Cats
4.79
Fisheries and fishing
4.9
Dogs
4.91
Viruses
4.91
ToL
4.94
Cetaceans
4.97
Primates
4.98
Sharks
5.04
All wikiprojects average
5.05
Dinosaurs
5.12
Equine
5.15
Bats
5.25
Mammals
5.32
Aquarium fishes
5.35
Hypericaceae
5.38
Turtles
5.4
Birds
5.46
Australian biota
5.5
Marine life
5.54
Animals
5.56
Paleontology
5.57
Rodents
5.58
Amphibians and Reptiles
5.64
Fungi
5.65
Bivalves
5.66
Plants
5.67
Algae
5.68
Arthropods
5.69
Hymenoptera
5.72
Microbiology
5.72
Cephalopods
5.74
Fishes
5.76
Ants
5.79
Gastropods
5.8
Spiders
5.86
Insects
5.9
Beetles
5.98
Lepidoptera
5.98
Spineless editors overwhelmed by stubs

Within the Tree of Life and its many subprojects, there is an abundance of stubs. Welcome to Wikipedia, what's new, right? However, based on all wikiprojects listed (just over two thousand), the Tree of Life project is worse off in average article quality than most. Based on the concept of relative WikiWork (the average number of "steps" needed to have a project consisting of all featured articles (FAs), where stub status → FA consists of six steps), only seven projects within the ToL have an average rating of "start class" or better. Many projects, particularly those involving invertebrates, hover at an average article quality slightly better than a stub. With relative WikiWorks of 5.98 each, WikiProject Lepidoptera and WikiProject Beetles have the highest relative WikiWork of any project. Given that invertebrates are incredibly speciose, it may not surprise you that many articles about them are lower quality. WikiProject Beetles, for example, has over 20 times more articles than WikiProject Cats. Wikipedia will always be incomplete, so we should take our relatively low WikiWork as motivation to write more articles that are also better in quality.

Editor Spotlight: Showing love to misfit taxa

We're joined for this month's Editor Spotlight by NessieVL, a long-time contributor who lists themselves as a member of WikiProject Fungus, WikiProject Algae, and WikiProject Cephalopods.

1) Enwebb: How did you come to edit articles about organisms and taxonomic groups?

  • Nessie: The main force, then and now, driving me to create or edit articles is thinking "Why isn't there an article on that on Wikipedia?" Either I'll read about some rarely-sighted creature in the deep sea or find something new on iNaturalist and want to learn more. First stop (surprise!) is Wikipedia, and many times there is just a stub or no page at all. Sometimes I just add the source that got me to the article, not sometimes I go deep and try to get everything from the library or online journals and put it all in an article. The nice thing about taxa is the strong precedent that all accepted extant taxa are notable, so one does not need to really worry about doing a ton of research and having the page get removed. I was super worried about this as a new editor: I still really dislike conflict so if I can avoid it I do. Anyway, the most important part is stitching an article in to the rest of Wikipedia: Linking all the jargon, taxonomers, pollinators, etc., adding categories, and putting in the correct WikiProjects. Recently I have been doing more of the stitching-in stuff with extant articles. The last deep-dive article I made was Karuka at the end of last year, which is a bit of a break for me. I guess it's easier to do all the other stuff on my tablet while watching TV.

2) Enwebb: Many editors in the ToL are highly specialized on a group of taxa. A look at your recently created articles includes much diversity, though, with viruses, bacteria, algae, and cnidarians all represented—are there any commonalities for the articles you work on? Would you say you're particularly interested in certain groups?

  • Nessie: I was a nerd from a time when that would get you beat up, so I like odd things and underdogs. I also avoid butting heads, so not only do I find siphonophores and seaweeds fascinating I don't have to worry about stepping on anyone's toes. I go down rabbitholes where I start writing an article like Mastocarpus papillatus because I found some growing on some rocks, then in my research I see it is parasitized by Pythium porphyrae, which has no article, and how can that be for an oomycete that oddly lives in the ocean and also attacks my tasty nori. So then I wrote that article and that got me blowing off the dust on other Oomycota articles, encouraged by the pull of propagating automatic taxoboxes. Once you've done the taxonomy template for the genus, well then you might as well do all the species now that the template is taken care of for them too. and so on until I get sucked in somewhere else. I think it's good to advocate for some of these 'oddball' taxa as it makes it easier for editors to expand their range from say plants to the pathogenic microorganisms of their favorite plant.
My favorite clades though, It's hard to pick for a dilettante like me. I like working on virus taxonomy, but I can't think of a specific virus species that I am awed by. Maybe Tulip breaking virus for teaching us economics or Variola virus for having so many smallpox deities, one of which was popularly sung about by Desi Arnaz and then inspired the name of a cartoon character who was then misremembered and then turned into a nickname for Howard Stern's producer Gary Dell'Abate. Sorry, really had to share that chain, but for a species that's not a staple food it probably has the most deities. But anyway, for having the most species that wow me, I love a good fungus or algae, but that often is led by my stomach. Also why I seem to research so many plant articles. You can't eat siphonophores, at least I don't, but they are fascinating with their federalist colonies of zooids. Bats are all amazing, but the task force seems to have done so much I feel the oomycetes and slime moulds need more love. Same thing with dinosaurs (I'm team Therizinosaurus though). But honestly, every species has that one moment in the research where you just go, wow, that's so interesting. For instance, I loved discovering that the picture-winged fly (Delphinia picta) has a mating dance that involves blowing bubbles. Now I keep expecting them to show me when they land on my arm, but no such luck yet.

3) Enwebb: I noticed that many of your recent edits utilize the script Rater, which aids in quickly reassessing the quality and importance of an article. Why is it important to update talk page assessments of articles? I also noticed that the quality rating you assign often aligns with ORES, a script that uses machine-learning to predict article quality. Coincidence?

  • Nessie: I initially started focusing on WikiProject talk page templates because they seem to be the key to data collecting and maintenance for articles, much more so than categories. This is where you note of an article needs an image, or audio, or a range map. It's how the cleanup listing bot sorts articles, and how Plantdrew does his automated taxobox usage stats. The latter inspired me to look for articles on organisms that are not assigned to any ToL WikiProjects which initially was in the thousands. I got it down to zero with just copypasta so you can imagine I was excited when I saw the rater tool. Back then I rated everything stub/low because it was faster: I couldn't check every article for the items on the B-class checklists. Plus each project has their own nuances to rating scales and I thought the editors in the individual projects would take it from there. I also thought all species were important, so how can I choose a favorite? Now it is much easier with the rater tool and the apparent consensus with Abductive's method of rating by the pageviews (0-9 views/day is low, 10-99 is med, 100-999 is high...). For the quality I generally go by the ORES rating, you caught me. It sometimes is thrown off by a long list of species or something, but it's generally good for stub to C: above that needs formal investigation and procedures I am still learning about. It seems that in the ToL projects we don't focus so much on getting articles to GA/FA so it's been harder to pick up. It was a little culture shock when I went on the Discord server and it seemed everyone was obsessed with getting articles up in quality. I think ToL is focusing on all the missing taxa and (re)organizing it all, which when you already have articles on every anime series or whatever you can focus on bulking the articles up more. In any event, on my growing to-do list is trying to get an article up to FA or GA and learn the process that way so I can better do the quality ratings and not just kick the can down the road.

4) Enwebb: What, if anything, can ToL and its subprojects do to better support collaboration and coordination among editors? How can we improve?

  • Nessie: I mentioned earlier that the projects are the main way maintenance is done. And it is good that we have a bunch of subprojects that let those tasks get broken up into manageable pieces. Frankly I'm amazed anything gets done with WikiProject Plants with how huge its scope is. Yet this not only parcels out the work but the discussion as well. A few editors like Peter coxhead and Plantdrew keep an eye on many of the subprojects and spread the word, but it's still easy for newer editors to get a little lost. There should be balance between the lumping and splitting. The newsletter helps by crossing over all the WikiProjects, and if the discord channel picked up that would help too. Possibly the big Enwiki talk page changes will help as well.

5) Enwebb: What would surprise the ToL community to learn about your life off-Wikipedia?

  • Nessie: I'm not sure anything would be surprising. I focus on nature offline too, foraging for mushrooms or wild plants and trying to avoid ticks and mosquitos. I have started going magnet fishing lately, more to help clean up the environment than in the hopes of finding anything valuable. But it would be fun to find a weapon and help solve a cold case or something.
June DYKs

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.


sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
15   57th Infantry Regiment (Ottoman Empire) (talk) Add sources
135   Lower West Side, Chicago (talk) Add sources
856   Lesbos (talk) Add sources
68   Chicago Lawn, Chicago (talk) Add sources
262   Earthquake warning system (talk) Add sources
542   Mountaineering (talk) Add sources
3,914   Ultraviolet index (talk) Cleanup
34   Wendell Phillips Academy High School (talk) Cleanup
102   Korean architecture (talk) Cleanup
162   Wicker Park, Chicago (talk) Expand
158   Near North Side, Chicago (talk) Expand
14   Giuseppe Mengoni (talk) Expand
36   Cathedral High School (Indianapolis) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
82   Woodlawn, Chicago (talk) Unencyclopaedic
111   Nikos Sampson (talk) Unencyclopaedic
963   Globalization and World Cities Research Network (talk) Merge
164   Research I university (talk) Merge
129   Harmonic drive (talk) Merge
231   Cricket in the United States (talk) Wikify
6   Catherine O'Flynn (talk) Wikify
46   Semyon Krivoshein (talk) Wikify
2   Daphne Douglas (talk) Orphan
2   Tsikalia (talk) Orphan
3   Culture Coast Chicago (talk) Orphan
26   Printer's Row, Chicago (talk) Stub
38   Black Metropolis–Bronzeville District (talk) Stub
18   Teredo (bivalve) (talk) Stub
872   Paula Pell (talk) Stub
8   Tehachapi High School (talk) Stub
21   Montclare, Chicago (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Xifeng Wu

On 18 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Xifeng Wu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to a study conducted by epidemiologist Xifeng Wu and her colleagues, fifteen minutes of moderate exercise per day can increase lifespan by an average of three years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Xifeng Wu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Xifeng Wu), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
112   Beverly, Chicago (talk) Add sources
147   Near West Side, Chicago (talk) Add sources
136   Pullman, Chicago (talk) Add sources
50   Museum Campus (talk) Add sources
82   Lincoln Square, Chicago (talk) Add sources
150   North Lawndale, Chicago (talk) Add sources
76   Welfare in New Zealand (talk) Cleanup
196   The Mysterious Benedict Society (talk) Cleanup
8   Polycarpos Georkadjis (talk) Cleanup
16   Otterburn Park, Quebec (talk) Expand
81   Irving Park, Chicago (talk) Expand
122   Birmingham City Council (talk) Expand
146   Neapolitan cuisine (talk) Unencyclopaedic
129   Dog-leg gearbox (talk) Unencyclopaedic
484   Cyprus dispute (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,160   Homo heidelbergensis (talk) Merge
6   Theophanes the Branded (talk) Merge
53   Harborne (talk) Merge
91   Abdullah ibn Saba' (talk) Wikify
98   Persecution of Christians in the modern era (talk) Wikify
572   Stuffed peppers (talk) Wikify
4   Larry Huggins (talk) Orphan
9   Malinnov pistol (talk) Orphan
11   Pekka Siitoin (talk) Orphan
60   Torghatten (talk) Stub
49   Frozenbyte (talk) Stub
4   Buyo Dam (talk) Stub
3   Taabo Dam (talk) Stub
30   Spacer DNA (talk) Stub
10   Bandama River (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Tree of Life Newsletter

 
July 2019—Issue 004


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  List of felids by PresN
  Masked booby by Casliber
  Letter-winged kite by Casliber, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Plains zebra by LittleJerry, reviewed by starsandwhales
  Ornithogalum umbellatum by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
 


Newly nominated content

  Letter-winged kite by Casliber
  Megabat by Enwebb
  Onychopterella by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Dvulikiaspis by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk
  Clussexx Three D Grinchy Glee by Hunter Kahn
  Giant golden-crowned flying fox by Enwebb
  Myxomatosis by Rabbit Vet

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

White genocide conspiracy theory

Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO). Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ignacio Anaya. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Onel5969 TT me 22:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Your afd has failed, withdraw it and move on. Abductive (reasoning) 22:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Ignacio Anaya, you may be blocked from editing. - Be aware, removing AfD templates is a form of vandalism, which could lead to you getting blocked. Onel5969 TT me 22:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Ignacio Anaya. - Pretty sure this is gonna get you blocked. Please stop your disruptive editing. Onel5969 TT me 22:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

There is no longer an open afd, I snow closed it. Get over yourself. Abductive (reasoning) 22:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Ignacio Anaya. - Making an invalid snow close isn't going to help you not get blocked. Onel5969 TT me 22:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Again, anyone can seen that the Afd is a snow close. Abductive (reasoning) 22:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 

Your recent editing history at Ignacio Anaya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

AFD - Ignacio Anaya

AFD - Ignacio Anaya

Although anything is possible, it looks like this might be closed as Keep. Until then, please leave the AFD tag alone, to be removed by whoever closes the AFD discussion. It's not over until that discussion has been officially closed by an uninvolved party. Thanks for your cooperation. — Maile (talk) 00:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
122   National Biodiversity Network (talk) Add sources
12   New German Critique (talk) Add sources
28   Karl Dall (talk) Add sources
115   Flora of China (talk) Add sources
397   Chagos Archipelago (talk) Add sources
149   Fudgie the Whale (talk) Add sources
176   Pick-up sticks (talk) Cleanup
10   Hebe salicifolia (talk) Cleanup
11   North Carolina Botanical Garden (talk) Cleanup
36   Carapa guianensis (talk) Expand
30   Biofuel in the United States (talk) Expand
1,216   Sheikh Hasina (talk) Expand
1,269   Perennial plant (talk) Unencyclopaedic
246   Gruit (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3,016   Aspirin (talk) Unencyclopaedic
9   Hippocastanaceae (talk) Merge
985   Historically black colleges and universities (talk) Merge
10   Hippocastanoideae (talk) Merge
5   The Dogist (talk) Wikify
5   Galeruca tanaceti (talk) Wikify
326   Nightjar (talk) Wikify
14   Ecocrop (talk) Orphan
5   Waynewood (talk) Orphan
3   Endangered flora of Connecticut (talk) Orphan
20   Taurisci (talk) Stub
5   Rex Allen Arizona Cowboy Museum and Willcox Cowboy Hall of Fame (talk) Stub
3   Acer campestre 'William Caldwell' (talk) Stub
18   State Herbarium of South Australia (talk) Stub
103   Plants of the World Online (talk) Stub
10   Vasates quadripedes (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

 
August 2019—Issue 005


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Letter-winged kite by Casliber
  Megabat by Enwebb
  Rock parrot by Casliber
  Adelophthalmidae by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Giant golden-crowned flying fox by Enwebb, reviewed by Starsandwhales
  Myxomatosis by Rabbit Vet, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Tylopterella by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Starsandwhales and Enwebb
  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Slender glass lizard by SL93, reviewed by Casliber
  Guano by Enwebb, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Dvulikiaspis by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Casliber
  Rock parrot by Casliber, reviewed by The Rambling Man
  Leptospirosis by Cerevisae, reviewed by Ajpolino
  Hepatitis E by Ozzie10aaaa, reviewed by Casliber
  Cardabiodon by Macrophyseter, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Clostridium tetani by Ajpolino, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Newly nominated content

  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk
  Western yellow robin by Casliber
  Pekarangan by Dhio270599
  Hibbertopterus by Ichthyovenator












  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,146   2019 Africa Cup of Nations (talk) Add sources
504   Hibiscus syriacus (talk) Add sources
30   Hyacinthus orientalis (talk) Add sources
13   Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern (talk) Add sources
799   Lute (talk) Add sources
813   Salvia officinalis (talk) Add sources
1,061   Pear (talk) Cleanup
18   Iris japonica (talk) Cleanup
2,252   Photography (talk) Cleanup
9   Trolleybuses in Rimini (talk) Expand
23   U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (talk) Expand
41   International Trade Administration (talk) Expand
427   Office Depot (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,071   Lemon (talk) Unencyclopaedic
15   House of Sacchetti (talk) Unencyclopaedic
28   Christianization of the Rus' Khaganate (talk) Merge
64   Seigneur (talk) Merge
184   Social safety net (talk) Merge
30   Lim Wee-Chai (talk) Wikify
46   European Nature Information System (talk) Wikify
230   Valentinian III (talk) Wikify
4   Dodo (painter) (talk) Orphan
3   Nicolas Marie Thérèse Jolyclerc (talk) Orphan
2   Pine-oak Forests, Puebla, Mexico (talk) Orphan
12   Aculops (talk) Stub
28   Dave Cochrane (Canadian Forces officer) (talk) Stub
39   Cornus alba (talk) Stub
3   Entomobrya zona (talk) Stub
2   White County Asylum (talk) Stub
26   Hamamelis mollis (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

 

Your recent editing history at Vitamin E shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Just provide a WP:SCIRS source and stop edit warring, WP:WAR. Zefr (talk) 00:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

  • I added a source, as you requested, and you accuse me of edit warring? Abductive (reasoning) 00:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Your edit and the warning were seconds apart. But it did appear to be the start of warring. Sorry. The source you chose isn't the strongest or most recent. PMID 19823814 (2010) shows acetate is clinically used for children, so may help. --Zefr (talk) 00:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
That source appears to be talking about medically prescribed vitamin E, but I want to make a point about OTC supplements, which are probably consumed by tens of millions of people. Abductive (reasoning) 00:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
How about this 2015 review under Supplements/α-Tocopheryl esters? --Zefr (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Conveniently already in the article as a named ref. I have added it to the line. Abductive (reasoning) 01:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

The debatable sentence: "Most commercially available vitamin E supplements are the synthetic tocopheryl acetate because it prevents formulations from going rancid as quickly." Natural alpha-tocopherol and synthetic alpha-tocopherol can both be stabilized by creating the acetate form. As written, the sentence can be read to imply that synthetic tocopherol does not go rancid as quickly. I suggest the removal of the word "synthetic" from the sentence, and a revision to "Most commercially available vitamin E supplements are esterified as tocopheryl acetate because esters are more resistant to oxidative degradation during storage." David notMD (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Sure, sounds good. Abductive (reasoning) 17:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Article history

Vitamin E is an article I have edited at length and then nominated for a Good Article review. This was withdrawn because the article was still in flux - actively being edited by other editors - and also because no one started the review process. Also nominated Folate; it is waiting for a GA reviewer. David notMD (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

  • It is thought that the vitamin E oil used in vaping is what's killing people. Abductive (reasoning) 18:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
50   Sydney Technical High School (talk) Add sources
2,898   Scarface (1983 film) (talk) Add sources
2   Flora of Turkey, Betulaceae (talk) Add sources
12,812   2020 United States presidential election (talk) Add sources
14   Sámuel Teleki (talk) Add sources
336   Japanese giant salamander (talk) Add sources
175   Saudi Arabian–Yemeni border conflict (2015–present) (talk) Cleanup
1,260   Japanese cuisine (talk) Cleanup
88   Racial achievement gap in the United States (talk) Cleanup
371   ABM Industries (talk) Expand
120   Thrivent Financial (talk) Expand
47   Green Monster (automobile) (talk) Expand
8   Cowles Center for Dance and the Performing Arts (talk) Unencyclopaedic
17   County roads in Hennepin County, Minnesota (talk) Unencyclopaedic
31   Belvedere House and Gardens (talk) Unencyclopaedic
35   Featherbed (talk) Merge
48   Al Qunfudhah (talk) Merge
235   Pith (talk) Merge
24   126th Infantry Regiment (United States) (talk) Wikify
27   Unicentric Castleman disease (talk) Wikify
38   Mortification in Catholic theology (talk) Wikify
3   Leonard Thomas Draycott (talk) Orphan
20   Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (talk) Orphan
9   Purple Osaka mustard (talk) Orphan
2   Otophryne robusta (talk) Stub
2   Hoogmoed's tree frog (talk) Stub
2   Lema tree frog (talk) Stub
11   Theodore Wirth Park (talk) Stub
2   Cayenne slender-legged tree frog (talk) Stub
2   Manaus slender-legged tree frog (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

 
September 2019—Issue 006


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk
  Onychopterella by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Western yellow robin by Casliber
  Western yellow robin by Casliber, reviewed by Josh Milburn
  Apororhynchus by Mattximus, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Pekarangan by Dhio-270599, reviewed by Cerebellum
  Fritillaria by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Embioptera by Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth, reviewed by Vanamonde93
  Durio graveolens by NessieVL, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Big brown bat by Enwebb and Gen. Quon, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  King brown snake by Casliber, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Staffordshire Bull Terrier by Atsme, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Ambush predator by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Enwebb
  Belemnitida by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Newly nominated content

  Apororhynchus by Mattximus
  Meinhard Michael Moser by J Milburn
  St. Croix macaw by FunkMonk
  Paleocene by Dunkleosteus77
  Orcinus meyeri by Dunkleosteus77
  Snakefly by Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth
  Tricolored bat by Enwebb
  Halloween darter by Enwebb






  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 22:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
4   Mikhail Stepanovich Voronin (talk) Add sources
1,159   Election (talk) Add sources
56   Psilocybe fimetaria (talk) Add sources
129   Kommanditgesellschaft (talk) Add sources
69   Tribolonotus gracilis (talk) Add sources
3,122   Psilocybin mushroom (talk) Add sources
463   Sixteen Tons (talk) Cleanup
40   Legal status of psychoactive Amanita mushrooms (talk) Cleanup
16   David Ensor (journalist) (talk) Cleanup
407   Agaricus (talk) Expand
6,494   Me Too movement (talk) Expand
94   Fistulina hepatica (talk) Expand
494   Belgaum (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,189   Legal status of psilocybin mushrooms (talk) Unencyclopaedic
59   Shortwave broadcasting in the United States (talk) Unencyclopaedic
96   Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England (talk) Merge
622   Planarian (talk) Merge
501   Environmental factor (talk) Merge
18   Maria (empress) (talk) Wikify
7   Power blackjack (talk) Wikify
157   Soil structure (talk) Wikify
30   Dodhara Chandani Bridge (talk) Orphan
2   A. G. Escandon (talk) Orphan
2   Ashgabat Watersports Complex (talk) Orphan
8   Amanita fuliginea (talk) Stub
7   Dendrochytridium (talk) Stub
4   Melanophyllum (talk) Stub
199   LIHKG (talk) Stub
5   Chorla (talk) Stub
6   Elizabeth Platz (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,911   James Comey (talk) Add sources
104   Climacteric (botany) (talk) Add sources
45   Prunus subg. Cerasus (talk) Add sources
66   USS Albacore (SS-218) (talk) Add sources
134   Ursuline Academy (Delaware) (talk) Add sources
49   Marasca cherry (talk) Add sources
241   Prunus avium (talk) Cleanup
9   North Star cherry (talk) Cleanup
166   Rootstock (talk) Cleanup
18   David Conlon (talk) Expand
13   Dr. Zeus Inc. (talk) Expand
783   Fertilisation (talk) Expand
1,054   Prada (talk) Unencyclopaedic
789   Eurasian Steppe (talk) Unencyclopaedic
44   The Bible Unearthed (talk) Unencyclopaedic
24   Dulla (organ) (talk) Merge
375   Superior colliculus (talk) Merge
7,574   Climate change (talk) Merge
2   Nandalike Balachandra Rao (talk) Wikify
15   Trailokyanath Chakravarty (talk) Wikify
36   Battle of Boonville (talk) Wikify
4   Heinrich Gottfried Philipp Gengler (talk) Orphan
5   Ravi Gulati (talk) Orphan
27   Sweet potato storage (talk) Orphan
13   Seisonidae (talk) Stub
126   Al Bayt Stadium (talk) Stub
5   Prunus canescens (talk) Stub
8   John Schank (talk) Stub
14   Louisiana State Act 159 (talk) Stub
4   Hungarian Heritage Award (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

"Org. React." listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Org. React.. Since you had some involvement with the Org. React. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2019 Pakistan train fire

On 31 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Pakistan train fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
954   Peach (talk) Add sources
228   Prunus serotina (talk) Add sources
149   Greengage (talk) Add sources
2,392   Joint Special Operations Command (talk) Add sources
31   Fort William railway station (talk) Add sources
4,398   Dave Grohl (talk) Add sources
145   New Soviet man (talk) Cleanup
945   Guardians of Religion Organization (talk) Cleanup
279   Catholic particular churches and liturgical rites (talk) Cleanup
671,316   Wikipedia (talk) Expand
52   Prunus salicina (talk) Expand
1,314   ISIL territorial claims (talk) Expand
16   Philaret Drozdov (talk) Unencyclopaedic
55   2019 in rail transport (talk) Unencyclopaedic
205   Pariah dog (talk) Unencyclopaedic
41   Catholic lay organisations (talk) Merge
152   Focolare Movement (talk) Merge
543   American football field (talk) Merge
387   UAVs in the U.S. military (talk) Wikify
21   Pet ownership among the homeless (talk) Wikify
395   Fruit anatomy (talk) Wikify
6   International reactions to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (talk) Orphan
2   International reactions to the 2018 Malaysian general election (talk) Orphan
2   The Church of St. Alexis in Rogozhskaya Sloboda (talk) Orphan
9   Peacotum (talk) Stub
9   Umm Elgar (talk) Stub
6   Epipole of Carystus (talk) Stub
3   Prunus tianshanica (talk) Stub
13   Nectaplum (talk) Stub
6   Gurziwan District (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is   Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1.   Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2.   Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3.   Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4.   Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5.   SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6.   Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7.   Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8.   HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)