I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.

To do list:


    Add'l links


    CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


    Immediate requests Entries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 1
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    ...from administrators 1
    Requests for unblock 121
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 54
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 7
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 119
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 25
    Open sockpuppet investigations 249
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    AB = Administrative Backlogs edit

    Administrative backlog edit

    WP:AIV edit

    AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Reports edit

    Bot-reported edit

    User-reported edit


    CSD / PRODs edit

    CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 1
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 1
    Spam pages 10
    Importance or significance not asserted 2
    Other candidates 11

    The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
    ( source / chronological order / expired )

    WP:UAA / WP:RFPP edit

    UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

    Usernames for administrator attention

    Bot-reported edit

    User-reported edit

    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level edit

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Laddu edit

    Reason: Persistent ongoing vandalism Ram1751 (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Shen Yinhao edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – this page has been frequently vandalized, with people constantly adding false info about him dying, and not providing sources. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
    Also added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Cartoonito (American programming block) edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – That Happy Tree Friends fanatic is at it once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Semi-protected indefinitely. If a year didn't stop them ... Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Astro (company) edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    The Eras Tour edit

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An influx of fan editors adding blatantly unsourced and contentious information. ℛonherry 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protected for a period of the rest of the existing duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Madden NFL 2005 edit

    Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 20:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Smart edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked: Iamda123 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. For added good measure, 2607:FB91::/32 has been globally blocked for three years. Favonian (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Nemo (rapper) edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated anti-trans vandalism as subject is currently participating in the Eurovision Song Contest 2024 and repeatedly misgendered out of spite. Could do with protection for about a week which will take it beyond the run of the contest. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per the informal practice now of doing this in every case where article subjects get misgendered. Will also be RevDel'ing those edits and maybe making some blocks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    The Loud House related articles edit

    Semi-protection: Ongoing IP Vandalism over the last week (though this vandal has been doing so on-and-off on all four articles since last November). All IPs are part of the same range. Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    List of programs broadcast by Treehouse TV edit

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content/unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Fenraan edit

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. instead. Acroterion (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Connetquot School District edit

    Reason: Users are blanking sections of the article, and falsely claiming the information is false or "divisive" while doing so. These are exclusively IP edits, and not registered users. I'm requesting semi-protection for both the District's page and Connetquot High School's page. Robertjhennigan (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Khaby Lame edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by IPs and new users in the past week, including one who usurped the entire article. Air on White (talk) 01:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level edit

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page edit

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    ChatGPT edit

    New URL Change from chat.openai.com to chatgpt.com 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

    (Not an Admin but...) The main url is chat.openai.com, chatgpt.com redirects you to there. No reason to change it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
    probably an A/B test 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

    Talk:Israel-Hamas war edit

    I would like to request the addition of a talk page on the Israel-Hamas war article that points out that the map on said article doesn’t show the Israeli evacuation order from Rafah and should be updated. LordOfWalruses (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

    Handled requests edit

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
    Protected edit requests

    6 protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Module:List (request) 2024-03-25 20:55 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
    Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (request) 2024-04-25 14:25 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
    MediaWiki:Wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked (request) 2024-05-01 12:11 MediaWiki page (log)
    MediaWiki:Wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked-range (request) 2024-05-01 12:11 MediaWiki page (log)
    Module:Message box/ombox.css (request) 2024-05-08 23:45 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
    Template:Automatic category TOC/core (request) 2024-05-09 14:07 Fully protected (log) From Template:CatAutoTOC/core: Modified by Pppery on 2024-02-22: "Per Xaosflux's full protection of parent"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
    8 template-protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Template:Infobox station (request) 2024-04-30 18:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:S-reg (request) 2024-05-01 19:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Canadian party colour/name (request) 2024-05-06 07:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Module:Multiple image (request) 2024-05-06 15:29 Template-protected (log) Protected by Jackmcbarn on 2014-11-18: "High-risk Lua module"
    Module:College color/data (request) 2024-05-09 14:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2024-05-09 21:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
    Template:Inflation/year (request) 2024-05-09 21:17 Template-protected (log) From Template:Inflation-year: Protected by Zzuuzz on 2016-10-21: "High risk template 11k+ transclusions"
    Template:Large category TOC/tracking (request) 2024-05-10 00:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ymblanter on 2020-04-07: "Highly visible template: request at WP:RFPP"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


    WP:RFA edit

    RFA= Requests for adminship

    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    No RfXs since 12:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

    WP:RFP edit

    RFP= Requests for permissions

    Autopatrolled edit

    User:Princess of Ara edit

    I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

    User:Prince of Erebor edit

    I have created 76 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:SheriffIsInTown edit

    I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Crisco 1492 edit

    Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights: I have north of 600 articles created, including several dozen FAs. I intend to come out of retirement, and given the backlogs it may be easier to bring back my autopatrolled rights.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

     Done Happy unretirement; great to have you back! Schwede66 02:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Xoak edit

    I'm an AFC reviewer, ardent contributor to Women In Red (most of my articles are on women) and biological topics. Xtools shows I have 57 live articles, however as far as I can recall, I've created at least 2 articles from redirects. [note that out of the 4 deleted articles, 3 were self delete]. I've 5 passed DYKs and 1 GA so far. I hate stubs and do everything on my part to at least create a C or a bare minimum Start.

    It'll be nice to have this right, as it'd reduce the backlog. One self-criticism I'd do here is at times I do not categorize pages myself and leave it for others. But I try to categorize some of the time, and I'll make sure I do not leave any pages I create from here on uncategorized. I've had a few warnings about copyvio, though they were a case of WP:LIMITED and once a case of accidental copy-paste. Nonetheless, I've been very careful ever since and will be perpetually.

    I'm courtesy pinging administrator @Ipigott as they're somewhat familiar with my work, and we had some delightful interactions.

    It's okay if you feel I should not be given this right as yet. Regards. X (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

     Not done I've had a look and you aren't too far off. Apart from categorisation, the other obvious flaw is not defining DEFAULTSORT (please look up why that's important or what it is). I've taken your very latest article and made it "perfect" from a Manual of Style perspective, all in single steps so that you can see what else you could improve on. I hope that's useful. Please go back to your bios and define DEFAULTSORT where other editors haven't done that for you in the meantime. I'd say come back once you've written another half dozen articles, say, and I or someone else will have another look. If you have questions about any of those edits referred to above, please get in touch (via my talk page or an article's talk page; not here). Schwede66 23:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


    Confirmed edit

    User:NeuropolsDummy edit

    Legitimate sockpuppet of Neuropol. See request making sure sock is allowed, and my user page, which should have a signature with my name by the time this is reviewed. NeuropolsDummy (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    legitimate sock of mine Thanks,NeuropolTalk 15:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
     Done stwalkerster (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:DanaRHill edit

    eMarketer has changed to EMARKETER. I work for EMARKETER and would like to update the article name and the logo in the article. DanaRHill (talk) 18:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

     Not done Please see WP:PAID before proceeding, thanks. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    Page mover edit


    User:Kung Fu Man edit

    Requesting page mover rights for my frequent work on video game character articles, many of which involve writing up an article on a userpage to later move to where a previous redirect may exist and working alongside other editors towards this end. Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

     Not done, as I'm not seeing any need. If someone writes a new article in their userspace, and they're the only editor, they can simply copy/paste their content into any existing redirect or article. Prime example is the nonsense happening around Locke Cole/User:Cukie Gherkin/Locke Cole. If you find yourself making a number of RM/TR requests for pages that don't fit this bill (which I see none of to date) there might be more of an argument for granting. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:WiinterU edit

    I would like to have page moving rights because of many company articles with incorrect article names with their correct names being the redirects. WiinterU 00:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

     Not done per lack of demonstrated need; no RM/TR requests, very little RM participation, and none of the moves you have made seem to indicate that suppression of a redirect or a round-robin page move were necessary. Primefac (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Remsense edit

    1. I often move articles in a space (China and Chinese-related topics) where there are specific naming conventions that are uncontroversial moves, sometimes requiring #delete-redirect.
    2. I often move pages around in my userspace, and #suppress-redirect would perhaps clutter the U1 log less. Remsense 23:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
     Done for three months. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Clearfrienda edit

    I'm requesting page mover rights to draftify articles without having to go through WP:CSD. I have lots of experience at WP:AFC and WP:NPP reviewing and moving pages and meet the minimum requirements. Clearfrienda 💬 21:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

     Done. Primefac (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Wikiexplorationandhelping edit

    I have participated in quite a few page moves as of late, and this could help me move pages more better and efficiently. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 14:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


    Pending changes reviewer edit

    User:Sunnyboi18 edit

    Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.

    I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
    I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
    Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
    I'm leaving this open for another, previously uninvolved admin to review, I was just explaining myself. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
     Not done. In reviewing your edit history, it doesn't look like you're actually active in anti vandalism efforts. For example, you've only undone an edit 3 times, and each of those times was undoing your own edit. You also only have 7 user talk page edits, all of which are to your own talk page. Typically for someone involved in anti vandalism we'd expect more undo actions and some warnings posted on other user's talk pages. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Allan Nonymous edit

    I have a history of cleaning up grammar, removing and refactoring uncited content and fixing citations. I'm hoping to maybe expand my editing scope a bit. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:RowanJ LP edit

    I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:Nigel757 edit

    I'm a long-term editor on Wiki, assisting with anti-vandalism. Almost all my edits have been anti-vandalism, as well as having two successful AfD, helping preventing the use of Wikipedia as a promotional tool. I'm requesting the pending changes reviewer permission to assist in catching vandalism on articles under pending changes protection. Nigel757 (talk) 02:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

     Done The Night Watch (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

    User:2RDD edit

    Pls I ask this permission granted because I've surpassed 500 edits; which means I'm extended confirmed user. Please I want to be a part of this one too. Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


    Rollback edit

    User:CGP05 edit

    Hello! I revert vandalism quite frequently and I would like rollback rights so I can use the AntiVandal tool to make the process faster. CGP05 (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 06:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry about that. I try to warn the majority of editors that vandalize. I will ensure that I warn every time from now on. CGP05 (talk) 13:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
    Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. I note that again, you've failed to notify an editor post revert even after you promised to do so yesterday. Anyways, upon further review, I'm not seeing enough consistent counter-vandalism work to determine whether you'll be able to use the tool appropriately. I also see that you've made a total of zero reports to AIV, which is an important stop for any serious counter-vandalism patroller. Please review my feedback, and if you're still interested in the tool, then please spend at least a month actively patrolling before reapplying. As such, closing as  Not done -Fastily 06:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you a lot for the feedback and I will take it into account before reapplying. CGP05 (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

    Footer edit

    Policies and links

      Today's afd

      Citation_templates

      Edit counter and analysis

      This user is a member of the

      Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

      Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

      It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

      This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

      Unified login: Xymmax is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.
      Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

      I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.