User talk:Tyw7/Archive 3

• 1
• 2
• Archive 3
• 4

Click show to view navigation bar

Unified login: Tyw7 is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.

Committed identity: 4CB8D7C892550264892E0E7EAC6BB9DE38A19E6A8329DBE9869358CBCBA0B8147F84E5245F1DC195F0638DAA6F64C2817C719C2ECFF4BFA8117E98A846D8DCA8 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

---

About

Talk (Email me)

Contributions

Image Gallery

Userboxes

Awards

Subpages

Sandbox

---

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr ( Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare ( Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus ( Keilana (submissions) and Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John ( Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place Casliber (submissions) and second place Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Norton 360, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

The Norton 360 article has recently added material that reads as a product advertisement. I have attempted to request a community GAR, but since it's my first I may have not have gotten it right. Notice below: Article, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thanks

Techguy95 (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014

Today's motto...

→ Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da, life goes on.

Nominate one today!

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Orphaned non-free image File:SetPoint Settings.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SetPoint Settings.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Help.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Help.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reticulated Spline ^{(t • c)} 23:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Downloadinsight.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Downloadinsight.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Inspiration software.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inspiration software.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Computer Security user status

Hello Tyw7,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tyw7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Tyw7! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

MS Antonia Graza (fictional ship) - Proposed deletion

Please note that editors can remove proposed deletions simply by removing the tag; they aren't required to provide a rationale. That said, in this case I agree with you (in fact, I proposed deletion of the article less than a month prior), and would be happy to support an AFD. Alternately I'd be willing to open one if you'd be willing to support. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I thought that they need to provide reason when they delete. But I would happy to support the deletion. PS I've nominated the article for deletion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MS_Antonia_Graza_(fictional_ship). Can you double check for me as I used Twinkle but it didn't add a page to the AFD so I had to do it manually. --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 21:51, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I think you're all set, and I've supported the AfD. If you really want to be above reproach (or feel additional opinions would be valuable, which may be useful if the AfD gets minimal participation), you might mention the AfD at WT:FILM, but I'd say right now you shouldn't feel obligated.

I checked WP:DEPROD, and other than removing the tag, an objector isn't required to do anything else, though it's not a bad idea for them to provide some context for their contesting the deletion. It's also explicitly stated, as I thought, that once a PROD has been removed you shouldn't replace it, so I think AfD was the way to go on this one. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Article's been deleted. Thanks for doing the heavy lifting with the AfD! DonIago (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I saw. If you need my support for others, feel free to ping me. --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 20:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Sure! Same to you! I'm happy to report that I don't open a whole lot of AfDs myself, but I'd found this particular article dubious since the moment it was created. DonIago (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tyw7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Kristen ITC" color="Green">[[User:Tyw7#p|''Tyw7'']]</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User:Tyw7/t|☎ Contact me!]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Tyw7|<span style="cursor:help;">Contributions</span>]]) : Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)

to

[[User:Tyw7#p|<i style="font-family: Kristen ITC; color: Green;">Tyw7</i>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User:Tyw7/t|☎ Contact me!]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Tyw7|<span style="cursor:help;">Contributions</span>]]) : Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Sorry. Done. Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 17:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of it! —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Ha!

Meh you don’t scare me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B112:BEE5:C5A5:822:51A5:E4B0 (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Reversion of my edits

How were my edits not based on a neutral point of view? Why exactly were they reverted? (97.90.153.18 (talk) 22:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC))

See your page -- Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 23:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Disable Autosign

How can I disable the AutoSign feature? It annoyingly autosigns every non article page I edit.--Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 13:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Tyw7:, If you go to the Preferences link at the top of the page, you'll see a "Signature" section you can simply blank. Then there's nothing to add. I'm not exactly sure why you'd want to have the signature you obviously spent some time crafting not appear on talk pages but if that's happening without using the signature button or the tildes, then you probably have some gadget on one of your script pages. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm talking about the autosign button at the bottom. See https://imgur.com/a/YMHqvhI I have disabled all the gadgets but it's persisting. -- Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 20:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

You had the YesAutoSign template at the top of this page. I've removed it, and that should take care of your issue. Please see Template:YesAutosign/doc. Good luck with editing. — Maile (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The checkbox looks like meta:User:Perhelion/signing.js which you load here. Hat tip to AntiComposite who helped me find it. Huon (talk) 21:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks that helped. I was looking at my gadgets. --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 21:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Hello!

46.227.72.88 (talk) 15:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey. --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 15:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Autosign test

Your revert [1]

The IP is allowed to delete warnings from his or her talk page. With very limited exceptions, English Wikipedia users are allowed to deleted whatever they wish from their talk pages. Pease don't undo such deletions. Meters (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough. I thought deletion of warning templates aren't allowed. My bad. --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 19:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

No biggie. It's a common misunderstanding, and it actually is not allowed on some Wikipedias. Meters (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

File:MDLP banner.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Avoid red-linked categories

Hello. Please can you remove Category:Tyw7's pictures from User:Tyw7/licence.css? Aside from the fact you shouldn't have red-linked categories anywhere per WP:REDNOT, such user-specific categories are generally deprecated (although there's a handful at Category:Wikipedia images by source). Partly because it suggests WP:OWNERSHIP, but also because there's more efficient ways to track your files, such as going to your Contributions and filtering by namespace. TIA Le Deluge (talk) 11:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. It was copied and pasted from my template at Commons. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for welcoming me to the Wikipedia world.

Still learning how to edit and how it all works. I appreciate you having reached out. Kukatt (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Kukatt: There's nothing to it. A good place to start is Wikipedia:Tutorial/Formatting --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:36, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Help with Archive navigation

I am trying to set up the archive navigation and it's counting the header User:Tyw7/Archive header as an archive. How to avoid this?

See User talk:Tyw7/Archive 3 for an example. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

At a glance there are likely two ways to fix this:

• Wait until you have five archives. Then the "5" should point to the "real" archive 5.
• Rename User:Tyw7/Archive header to something without the space, say User:Tyw7/Archiveheader, and get rid of that page and the redirect. The way I understand the {{Archive nav}} template, it looks for pages with a title of "Base/Archive XYZ" and tries some fancy things with the "XYZ" part. When the only pages meeting that pattern are genuine archives, you'll likely not have the "Archive 5" which to me looks like the template's attempt to turn your header page's title into something.

I hope this helps. Huon (talk) 22:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I've renamed but it still counts the header as archive 5 --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

To me it doesn't any more. Not sure what happened; possibly the problem was User talk:Archive header, not the page in user space. Or it was just a server cache issue and it took some time for the various pages to be rendered correctly. Huon (talk) 19:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Huon: I've deactivated the help me tag as someone over at Village pump helped me out. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 19:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Block User:Troop350. Forgot password, no email linked

I forgot the password for User:Troop350 and without an email address on the account, I can't reset it. Therefore, I request that an admin block the account to prevent it from being abused. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 17:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

• It looks like User:Troop350 is tagged with {{R from alternative name}} which isn't intended to be used on user pages; I'm not entirely sure whether that was the case 10 years ago when the template was added but it certainly is the case today. I'd strongly recommend removing it. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

G3 criteria

I wanted to give you a heads up that G3 specifically excludes articles about hoaxes such as Hook Island Sea Monster. I'm not going to contest it since the AFD was going that way anyway, but I just want to make sure we're doing things the right way as we sift through the sillier corners of the 'pedia. Let me know if you feel otherwise, I'm happy to discuss. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 02:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Dlthewave: Ok fair enough. So what speedy criteria would you say that fits under? Notability? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 06:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I don't believe this fits under any speedy criteria. –dlthewave ☎ 02:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Question about notices

Are users allowed to remove edit warring notice from their talk page? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 11:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

• Yes, WP:BLANKING was changed a number of years ago, and apart from the important matters mentioned there, we may remove warnings. Sam Sailor 12:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Sam Sailor How about /active/ AIV investigations? Are they allowed to remove that? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 12:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

If you read the link which Sam Sailor has already supplied, you will see that you can remove anything from your talkpage apart from declined unblock requests (until the block is lifted) and deletion tags. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

U.S. Deletion sorting

• Nb. I have drafted a proposal to create guidelines for the U.S. deletion sorting page. The discussion is located at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting § WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America guideline proposal. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SkyPlayer.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SkyPlayer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I wasn't expecting an answer to that hypothetical question. Though if the author who sold the rights to one of their sane works ever becomes famous and somebody creates an article on this dung beetle story, then we'll have sort this. What's next deletion sorting excrement anyone? ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Doubt that exists. Probably fictional elements, books, science fiction (maybe?). But I'll just file into any significant states in case somebody who patrols those catagory knows more about him or his story than I do. Heh for all I know he could be a local best seller. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 01:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry...

...that I just reverted you. Lack of mouse-pad control... Josh Milburn (talk) 19:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

No biggy. Thanks for letting me know. I'm assuming you're trying to revert a vandal and misclick the wrong page? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 19:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please help me

Can you help me delsort Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATV Arena and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Ajax kit history since I ..., thanks Hhkohh (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Since you what? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping if you had replied 14:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Someone complain about my delsort Hhkohh (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stéphane Tein-Padom, cheers Hhkohh (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Just curious, what did the complain say? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:35, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

See my talk page, do not forget Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stéphane Tein-Padom Hhkohh (talk) 13:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

noinclude !!

If you still think that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onision should be deleted, for goodness sake, bracket the speedy tag with <noinclude></noinclude>. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

RHaworth, just curious what happened when I didn't include the tag? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 20:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

For goodness sake! Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Two days ago and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 July 14 both appeared in CAT:CSD asking to be deleted. You were lucky - it would have been worse if it was a recent AfD nomination - several more pages transclude the current day's log, eg. Wikipedia:XfD today . — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Whoops. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onision

Transferred from user talk:RHaworth

Why was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onision undeleted? -- Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

• Either you have a very short memory or I am missing something. I thought we had closed the discussion on this topick on your user talk page half an hour before you left this message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Well didn't you delete the page and then undelete the page? Or somebody else undeleted the page --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 11:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

• I received a valid restore request here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

  Fair enough. Carry on. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification concerns

If you are not already aware of the policy, please read WP:CANVASS. I notice that you have notified two users about several AfD discussions (diff, diff), but it appears that you are only notifying those that seem to agree with your views. For example, in this post you mentioned this AfD discussion, but you only notified the nominator for deletion, but did not notify the other participant (User:James500) in the AfD discussion who opined for the article to be retained. Furthermore, James500 has contributed to several of the discussions you listed in your posts, but from the Revision history for their user talk page, you have not notified them about these discussions. Comes across as overt canvassing, and please notify all interested users when sending notifications, not only those that tend to agree with your views. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Northamerica1000, well, James had already participated in almost all the discussion I listed. I didn't check them all so I might be mistaken. In any case, I had notified him now. And I thought that the wording used was neutral enough not to count as canvassing. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for providing the notification to James500. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

I may have overreacted a bit, because yes, James500 has contributed to many of those discussions (I also have not checked them all). The lack of notifying all involved is what stood out. At any rate, thanks for being congenial. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

No problem. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 12:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@User:Northamerica1000: I have no desire to be notified of the existence any AfD. I would prefer not to receive notifications like the one Tyw7 sent me at your request. James500 (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Please protect my talk page and possibly block the IP Hopping vandal

An IP hopping vandal is adding the user is block sock puppet template to my talk page and the talk page of a couple of other users. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tyw7&action=history --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 12:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I posted at ANI. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I saw. But he might be back. At least an Admin had blocked the IP (for now). Edit: And he's back. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 12:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Care when reverting vandalism

It's always a good idea to carefully check what you are reverting to when you undo vandalism, especially on a page which has had a lot of recent vandalism. See the image you restored in this edit. For some reason the image doesn't show when I go to that diff, I don't know why, and am not going to spend time finding out why, but the image does exist.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I should have just restored an earlier version rather than undoing the latest vandal. And thank gods it didn't show. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

That's MediaWiki:Bad image list at work Mortee (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion notifications

I've noticed you leaving messages for users to participate in various AfDs. Just curious what your method is. It doesn't look like you notify everyone in a given discussion (e.g. only select people from the first List of breakfast drinks AfD), but at the same time it doesn't look like the people you are notifying !voted a particular way, so it doesn't seem to be a canvassing thing. Just random selection? Do you keep a running list of who might be interested in what? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Well I just notify those who participated in the first deletion (maybe I missed a few as there was tons of back and forth discussion). But I left a general notification on Talk:List of breakfast drinks so that those who are interested can go and participate. More often than not it's if the user had participated in a similiar AFD ie of a similiar topic to the current one, they get pinged. For example, I notified those who participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foods by calorie, which is very similar to the breakfast drink AFD in the fact that both talks about list of food. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

We do have several mechanisms for deletion discussion notification (delsort, article alerts, the dashboard...). I think you will inevitably get accusations of canvassing like you did just now in the breakfast drink AfD. I'm not saying that's what you're doing, but if you're going to notify people you'll probably want to be careful that you are notifying every participant in a given discussion rather than acting like a bot to randomly select some. From your "maybe I missed a few" comment, perhaps you intended to notify everyone, in which case no big deal. :) $0.02 — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

The reason I was notifying is to avoid a stalemate. The previous request only had like 3 editors arguing before the time ran out. I feel that there might be an WP:OWN issue going on because of all the WP:PEACOCK praising going on. Therefore, I wanted to get a wider audience of uninvolved editors. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk page protection

Well, the vandal has returned, so I have protected the talk pages again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Gods they're persistent. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Editing the Boston Confucians‎.

Moved to User talk:DexterPointy § Editing the Boston Confucians.

 – Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 12:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)) 19:14, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Some notes on process

Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education Not for Sale (3rd nomination), I know you had good intentions, but it's not appropriate to close an AfD that you've participated in (or opened yourself). If you want to withdraw the nomination, just strike through your nominating statement with <s>...</s> and state that it's withdrawn. Some admin will eventually come along and officially close it. That may seem a little silly, but it's the standard practice and promotes full transparency.

The other thing I wanted to mention was the DRV you deleted. Again, I'm sure you had good intentions, but we don't do that. Like the AfD, you should have just struck your argument and stated that it was withdrawn. I've gone ahead and done that. Doing it this way leaves a clean record of what happened.

Please don't go back and change anything now; what's done is done. This is just for future reference. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

RoySmith Thanks. I'll keep in mind next time.

So I guess the main way to re-open the AFD is Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 July 29? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of breakfast foods does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

• Seriously, you're opining for deletion while adding content to the article. At the very least, please leave edit summaries to denote how you are changing the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:51, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

  Well there is edit summary... and I'm adding food that could be considered breakfast. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:53, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

• It looks like you're going down the same WP:POINT road that DexterPointy did with adding urine to the breakfast drinks list. You're clearly adding material for shock value, complete with terrible sources -- and those that aren't terrible are using (pizza) as a surprise in order to make a point about breakfast cereals, not saying that pizza is a typical breakfast food. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Well technically pizza could be considered a breakfast food as it is eaten at breakfast, commonly I should add. I found quite a few sources saying that pizza is eaten for breakfast. Heck, one source is saying it's healthier than cereal. I was going to revert the reindeer addition but somebody already reverted me previously. Anyway, sorry. And yeah I stopped adding farfetched food to the list. -- Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Tyw7: Don't be too sorry.

FYI: Reindeer sausage for breakfast is fairly common in Alaska (reindeer breakfast sandwich might also be common).

And you're not alone in being "pointy":
- Revision as of 10:48, 9 July 2018  : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_breakfast_foods&type=revision&diff=849489026&oldid=849461696
- Revision as of 17:15, 26 July 2018 : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_breakfast_foods&type=revision&diff=852104710&oldid=850048292
- Revision as of 18:26, 26 July 2018 : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_breakfast_foods&type=revision&diff=852112968&oldid=852104710
- Revision as of 17:28, 27 July 2018 : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_breakfast_foods&type=revision&diff=852258737&oldid=852256393
If you look into the reference by Andrew D., then you'll discover that the source does not even support the claim of æbleskiver being notable/common as breakfast in the USA. - So, it's not you, it's just that some a more equal than others.

BTW: I think User:Shadowowl was chased away from WP by DGG (ref. this i.e. 1'st AfD, 2'nd AfD). Well, we've both encountered DDG in very recently times. (like DGG clearly missing the ball here)
-- DexterPointy (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, he accused me of having bad faith when in fact I didn't make the nomination. And fair enough with the sausage. Also, without access to the book, I can't judge whether Æbleskiver is indeed eaten by others in US. But based on what you said, I'm guessing not. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

I have reopened AFD for the same article that GDG closed. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education Not for Sale (3rd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign for Free Education --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I am doing what I should have done after I stopped reviewing AFC submissions, at least taking a break for 1 year. DGG's closure was not the main reason for this. Northamerica1000 nuked an AFD which was relisted on an article and didn't even bother to remove the unsourced text and the possible fake prizes. That's the straw that broke the camel's back. Northamerica1000 pointed to a guideline which basically says Your hoax article is very welcome on Wikipedia, and you don't even have to reference your wordpress sites!. I could make an article about a non-existent person, source it with Youtube, Facebook or Twitter (totally acceptable according to keepists) and sources that don't mention the subject. Welcome to Hoaxpedia! » Shadowowl | talk 16:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@Shadowowl: Link to the article? And link to the quote that NA1000 posted? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Martín_Deiros_(2nd_nomination). Yes, he nuked it twice. I've removed all the bad sources and unreferenced text. It now has 1 source, which tells nothing more than his name, where he lives, and his nationality. Also, [2]. Sam Sailor didn't even look at the comment that someone replaced the sources, and instead ranted about how I don't understand Portuguese. Then he says that I didn't care about looking into the sources (I did, and there were only 2 that might be reliable). » Shadowowl | talk 17:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict) A valid rationale for deletion was not advanced in the nomination. You did not state, for example, anything about notability, or spam, or any of the other qualifying reasons that exist for deletion. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid deletion rationales. Also, you simply discussed the sources in the article in the nomination, but again, did not provide a qualifying reason for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:13, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

NA1000 wants a reason? He got a reason Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martín Deiros (3rd nomination) --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:11, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion policy is what requires a valid rationale for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

I've re nominated with a valid reason. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Ah, Northamerica1000 removed the Fried chicken from the breakfast list. I guess he can spot unreliable sources on articles he really likes. » Shadowowl | talk 17:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

And I got myself a new ANI thread. Great. » Shadowowl | talk 17:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Commented there. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 18:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@Shadowowl: Oooh, I see, Eastmain, that ANI. If that ANI isn't closed within a few hours, then it's got much boomerang potential. -- DexterPointy (talk) 18:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@Tyw7: Ref: "without access to the book," : You don't need access to the entire book to read the 2-3 relevant pages, which you can get at via GSearch\Books In America, æbleskiver sometimes is eaten as a breakfast food.
-- DexterPointy (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Looks like your fried chicken entry is approved --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 18:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

And I guess the source did say it is eaten as breakfast by some people. And that's a good enough mention. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 18:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Not my fried chicken, but Shadowowl's. -- DexterPointy (talk) 19:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• Reindeer meat is back on the menu » Shadowowl | talk 14:48, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

  Ah ha ha ha. And Rat-on-a-stick? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

  I've heard people ate termites for breakfast. I'm surprised it hasn't made this list already. » Shadowowl | talk 15:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

References

• Small-scale food editwar. Sadly not a food fight. » Shadowowl | talk 15:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Very tempted to add that but that might be seen as disruptive or pointy editing. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Rat-on-stick has returned! Dogs love rats! » Shadowowl | talk 15:06, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Ha ha. I have warned him for disruptive editing. Though I dislike that list, adding rats on a stick can be seen as POINTY editing. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

WP:Canvassing concerns

I am concerned that your post here comes across as canvassing, based upon you and the user you messaged tending to !vote for deletion in articles, and nothing more. (E.g. "we agree in AfD discussions, so they are likely to agree with my stance regarding the template, so I'll notify them".) Cursory checks have not provided any evidence that DexterPointy has edited or been involved in Template:Neighborhoods of Tel Aviv or participated in discussions regarding the template's content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Did you not see the wider notice at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Valley2city and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jethro_B, et all? The message was neutral and I want to see what others may say. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Still not seeing any evidence that DexterPointy has demonstrated an interest in the topic; you guys agree regarding deletion matters quite a bit; this comes across as canvassing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I've retracted the call as I thought he had participated. I must be looking at the wrong AFD. I thought he had participated in the AFD. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

My apologies

Hi Tyw7! I apologize for suddenly dropping you like that on IRC (we were talking in the unblock channel and getting you taken care of). My internet decided to go down, and I just now got re-connected and back up again (thanks, Comcast...). Anyways, I hope you weren't offended or upset that I had suddenly left, and I hope you were able to get help with your IP hard-block :-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: No problem. It seems I'm now able to edit so either another admin took care of it or it wasn't a following block. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

From what I can see, it was most likely either a hard IP address block that you were editing from behind, or you were having an issue with something that made you believe that you were blocked but were actually not. Either way, I'm happy to see that the issue is no longer present :-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Well the message said I was block so most likely the former. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Maintenance tagging

Martín Deiros was tagged with {{refimprove}} when you nominated it for deletion on 30 July. You had made no previous edits to the article. Following my !vote at AFD you then tagged the article with both {{unreliable sources}}, {{BLP unsourced}} and {{unreferenced}}, and tagged it with {{db-person}} which was declined, and ~half an hour ago further tagged with {{more footnotes}} despite no gen refs being present and this being the only external link. What goes wrong? Sam Sailor 20:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

And well it is unreferenced since the only reference link is dead (last I checked). And there was a comment on the AFD that the book even did not mention the subject! The more footnotes was made since there are no footnote for the book. So it's hard to know what the hell that reference is trying to support. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

This addition of {{no footnotes}} to Vestre Hestlægerhøe, an article you also have nominated for deletion, was wrong, all the article needed was a References section and a {{reflist}}. Sam Sailor 20:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

I added the no foot note since the foot note all just support the fact that the mountain is in Norway and nothing else. So I'm like, OK the mountain is in Norway.....So? Do you really need three sources to say yes, the mountain is in Norway. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me)

Please actually read the template documentation and identify what you are doing wrong. If you need help, I will be happy to help you, but all it really takes is a moment of reading. Sam Sailor 21:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Just curious what tag would qualify? Improve ref? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:11, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Eastmain

Maybe a TBAN was a good idea. Maybe I should create a list of all incompetent Eastmain votes and contested deletions. » Shadowowl | talk 20:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't know him enough to recommend the ban. But if what you said is true, it's worrying. Maybe ask an advise from a third party admin? I use to ask User:SoWhy. ^{re signing to activate ping}--Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I am giving Eastmain another chance. If he contests a deletion or votes keep for no reason or with a very bad source I will think about opening an ANI. » Shadowowl | talk 20:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging DBigXray and Hijiri88 to keep them in the loop --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:07, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging closing admin Northamerica1000 and possibly interested party DexterPointy --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

What a coincidence, I was typing a comment on the same topic at User talk:DexterPointy when I was pinged here.

• User:shadowowl, This second edit to comment on the editor was totally uncalled for, Such accusations will weaken your case and will be detrimental to you leading to your block. in your own interest, I would advice you to WP:DROPTHESTICK and don't do anything related to EM for the next 3-4 months. Give that guy a chance, if he is really so bad, and unwilling to improve, let someone else take him to ANI at a later date. Not you, since there will be counter allegations and at worst blocks for both parties. -
• User:Tyw7 yes, as the closing admin said, the BOOMERANG may also deserve short block, you can ask him more at his talk page to elaborate his opinion. -DBigXray 21:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

• I can leave Eastmain alone, but he chose to interfere with my CSD of an advertisement with the non-argument if an article exists for long enough, it must be good. I've reverted my accusation, thanks for telling that it was over the limit. » Shadowowl | talk 21:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

• Good call in reverting. Calling someone a "Paid promoter" without solid evidence is also enough reason for a block per WP:NPA so I would suggest you to remove that as well. yes leave him alone. AFAIK there is no IBAN between you 2, so both are free to comment on each other's AFD contribution (As long as the comment is about the edit/subject and not the editor), If the comment on the editor continues, (which I believe will be the case most likely) it WILL attract a block per WP:NPA the last ANI thread was enough warning to both of you. I personally don't want to see a block on both of yours block list, but not heeding to my advice will surely have consequences. --DBigXray 21:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@DBigXray:I've also removed that one. » Shadowowl | talk 21:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Good. and Olea_Medical is now CSD deleted as well. For Promo. --DBigXray 09:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

• Or take this Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ojas_Eye_Hospital. Even after Eastmain said he cleaned up the promo, it was still G11 material. » Shadowowl | talk 20:11, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

• Note that, I am not taking his side, but can both of us please assume that may be he was just trying his best to actually improve that article but his efforts fell short and there is only so much you can do to improve. I dont always agree with his opinion or comments at AfDs. But he still deserves credits for trying whatever he could and I have seen sometimes he does succeed and rightly so. For everything else there is always a closing admin, ready to CSD, or Deletion review or renominate (after a reasonable gap) (even if it is 4th time. --DBigXray 20:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Sometimes less is more - Friendly advice.

This is readable, whereas that is an information dump (and I'm not even talking about how awfully screwed-up it renders on my screen, which is also true; though such might be related to the "edit conflict" there.).
I don't think you improve people's understanding of texts by overloading them with vast amounts of textual redundancy.
--DexterPointy (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

I was trying to counter the point with example. It seems that no matter the example provided it isn't getting through. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

FYI: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DexterPointy. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping me in the loop. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Modifying comments

Just a heads-up but it is generally considered poor form, or even against policy, to do more than basic copy editing of comments except immediately after posting. If there's already been a discussion of those comments (as there was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IKASI) this is especially true. Let me know if you have any questions by pinging me or leaving a message on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

@Barkeep49: How's that? I've moved the addition as a comment at the bottom. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for moving it. WP:REDACT is the policy on this. Basically if you edit comments someone has replied to, it gives a misleading impression of what they commented on. Hope that makes sense. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) agree with User:Barkeep49 not following WP:REDACT makes the other person's comment appear stupid or not making any sense. You may edit your comment or even remove it altogether but not after someone else commented on it. Once a reply is made by another person and you feel like removing your own comment simply strike it off that gives an impression that you no longer stand by what was said earlier. --DBigXray 15:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

AfD

Hi, the article Life (2007 film) you included in the bundled AfD has not had an AfD tag added on the article at all so have removed it from the AfD as the discussion is 2 days old now.You can nominate it separately if you choose and link to it from the bundled AfD, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File:MDLP website.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File:MDLP courses.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

AfD improperly transcluded

Can you fix this IPs AFD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lydia_Janssen --DBigXray 20:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There is nothing to fix. The AFD process was never completed. The IP who posted the AFD notice has been blocked after making entirely evidence-free accusations of paid editing at WP:ANI. It was clearly done in bad faith, and the IP is in no position to complete it anyway. [3] 31.49.219.1 (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Looks like an IP already replied before I did, DBigXray. I'm assuming the issue is already resolved? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Looks like there are 2 IPs involved. For the timebeing I have reverted my huggle edit. anyway the request is to check if the subject is notable. it seems barely notable to me. WP:NARTIST has high standards. what do you think. --DBigXray 20:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Looks like Jytdog had already added a CSD tag to the article. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Good to see the Jytdog's edit. I did see that the ref1 wasn't NYT but looked like wallstreet. anyway, this request is done by Jytdog now. --DBigXray 20:46, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Stub article

Stub article has been deleted, but stub articles still stands. Something has to give. --Bod (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

The latter seems like a redirect. Nominate it for speedy if you want. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

I'd rather stub article also redirected, but cross namespace redirects are against Wikipedia policy? @Tyw7: Bod (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Looks like it. I've CSD it. PS you don't need to ping me on my own profile. I'll get notified if you reply. Pinging is only needed on other pages. But more often than not I'll watch the page. It's more needed if you had replied ages after I've posted the message. I'll un watch pages if there's no conversations. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Bodhi Peace Article deleted Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Request block of accounts that I had usurped to prevent impersonation

As subject. I had lost the password to these accounts and I don't see myself using these accounts to edit Wikipedia.

• User:Tyw
• User:Tyw4
• User:Tywin

--Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @SoWhy and RHaworth: as they're the only two admin I know. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Tyw4 is not registered. The other two I blocked. Regards SoWhy 11:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

is this how i ping you?

hi, your comments say to ping you if i reply, but i do not know how? i also cant figure out how to send a private message, so im posting here, the popup dialog also said i should include {{Ping|Tyw7}} @Tyw7:

Tacticomed (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

@Tacticomed: looks about right. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

AFD categories

hey! I'm just curious about what software you use to add the AfD categories? Twinkle? It's very inefficient for that software to add a signature every time. Just inquiring out of total curiosity, not complaining!96.127.244.27 (talk) 01:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm using User:Enterprisey/delsort. And it's procedure to add a signature to every entry. See the other AFDs. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Oxford Brookes University Rugby Football Club

Hi you recently added the deletion discuss of the above page to the deletion sorting for Fraternities and sororities which I think is out of the scope of the project as Fraternities and sororities have nothing to do with UK University sports clubs. Maybe it was an error because anyone watching the category will be specifically interested in Fraternities and sororities. the idea of delsorting is "transcluding AFD discussions in category specific pages, that makes it easier for people find a topic they have knowledge and interest in" and it is better not to send it to categories that are not associated. Just to let you know I undid this addition. cheers --Dom from Paris (talk) 10:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I thought it was related because it's a university club, which is sorta like a sonoroty. Maybe I'm mistaken. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Not really, fraternities do not exist in the UK and their aims have nothing to do with sporting teams. A Fraternity is a social organisation where the members themselves recruit you because there are shared values or class or visions or you are the son/daughter of an alumni etc and the sporting teams are made up palyers selected for their playing ability by the coaches. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough. Apologies. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

My Userpage

Earlier, you deleted several sections of my userpage. Please don't do that. --AwesumIndustrys (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

AwesumIndustrys, it looked to me like somebody vandalized your userspace. My apologies. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:54, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Tyw7 It's okay. I was meaning to edit it anyways AwesumIndustrys (talk) 22:57, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Your request for comment

Sorry I was out of town as indicated in my page. I see it was deleted already. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Alexf, it was in relation to the salting you've done. I posted the oddity at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Salted_article_re-created too. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Ah. Didn't realize. My page said I was out. I did not get back till now to get through the back log. Sorry. -- Alexf^(talk) 22:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Alexf, no problem. I think they have sorted out the reason behind the oddity. See that thread if you're interested. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for correcting my typing error when I suggested a merge at the deletion discussion for the article on Statue of Mohammed Fuzuli.Vorbee (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

No problem. I had created a redirection though. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:42, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Only 3 murders by women

List of men killed by women is a bad list. Really bad. Probably worse than the breakfast one. » Shadowowl | talk 10:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Shadowowl, it got killed. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Swansea Uni

Hi Tyw, given the comments on the talk page, I'd rather the file just get deleted than go through the fuss of sourcing the right person in a university of 6000 employees to sign the form. How do I remove it? Or can the removal procedure go ahead as you've started? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhys1234567890 (talk • contribs) 08:33, September 10, 2018 (UTC)

Rhys1234567890, well I have contacted the University and I'm waiting for someone to get back to me. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Contacting me

Sorry for my error. [[User:7&6=thirteen]]. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen, huh? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:47, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Mesa Distance Learning Program

Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mesa Distance Learning Program has been completed. As I mentioned in my ping to you: "I notice there is a tag on this article indicating it needs to be updated. You have also said that you would like it to be "improved". This is beyond the scope of the Guild." Although you did not reply, I copy edited the article anyway as it was short.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Children's books AfDs

Hi there. I've noticed you've nominated three books in the Edge Chronicles series for deletion. I think two of them are notable and have been or will be kept, while the the third was redirected to the series. Since AfD is not clean-up could I suggest that if you plan to continue work in this area you try and redirect pages that your BEFORE suggest aren't notable to the series article rather than AfD? Alternatively, you could reach out to myself or one of the other people who work in this area to ask about notability prior to nomination. Not watching so please ping me in any response. Thanks and Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Barkeep49, well I did a BEFORE search and couldn't find any notable sources there. That's why I opted to AFD in case somebody has offline sources that prove otherwise.

And you can take articles to AFD to get a redirect vote. Secondly, the articles had remained reference less for a long time. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

@Tyw7: One can and I in fact do take articles whose outcome I think should be redirect to AfD - but only after trying a redirect and seeing if it sticks. My guess is that in these cases it would. As to the sources, I certainly under why your BEFORE for Freeglader came up empty - while my sources are online they are behind a paywall. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Barkeep49, I don't think http://lookingglassreview.com/books/the-edge-chronicles-vox/ meets the definition of a non-trivial review by WP:Nbook. That series of book has at least 14 articles with similiarly no references. Should I go ahead and redirect them all? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

I am not familiar with Looking Glass Review so I don't know whether it's RS (many online review sites are not) but would suggest that the length of review provided there is normally considered substantial in children's book AfDs. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Barkeep49, the critieria says " "Non-trivial" excludes personal websites, blogs, bulletin boards, Usenet posts, wikis and other media that are not themselves reliable. An analysis of the manner of treatment is crucial as well; Slashdot.org for example is reliable, but postings to that site by members of the public on a subject do not share the site's imprimatur. Be careful to check that the author, publisher, agent, vendor. etc. of a particular book are in no way interested in any third party source."

So I can't really tell if that article does indeed meet the requirements. Looking at http://lookingglassreview.com/books/about/ it is probably one of those fringe cases.--Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Delirium (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Delirium (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Delirium (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Airline notability

Just to let you know that I consider that actually operating a scheduled service makes them noteworthy, it is unlikely that that would happen without it being reported somewhere. Its just the hurdle I use to consider if these airlines are worth including. I have to say a lot of these airlines dont make it that far for various reasons so are not really noteworthy for inclusion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

WP:NCORP says "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

WP:NCORP is only a guideline so I wouldnt get that worried about it, sometime you have to use a bit of common sense, my made up guideline about operating a scheduled service would still require a non-primary reference. In the end it is up to the closer of the discussion to balance the arguments. MilborneOne (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Well WP:GNG also requires significant coverage. Thus, I respectively disagree with you. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

OK but GNG is only a guideline as well and doesnt always trump common sense. MilborneOne (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for all the help you've done on Wikipedia! The community appreciates it ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Aww thanks. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Notability

You were involved in an AfD that resulted in a WP:SNOW. You might be interested in this one: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapa Road railway station. There are currently 2,800 articles written about the 8,500 India railway stations. Two thousand of those are stubs and several hundred are single-source sub-stubs. The inclusionists point to Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations)#Stations as policy that presumes notability, but I don't read it that way. --Rhadow (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Rhadow, ditto. I agree with you. I voted to merge. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Second chapter

Hello Tyw7, my request for a redirect for Sonasan railway station, the remedy suggested by Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations)#Stations was ignored. Instead, another editor deleted the article under WP:G7. You are invited to improve a newly introduced Sonasan railway station and to look at Hapa Road railway station as an example of an article that others argue should stay. Rhadow (talk) 12:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Rhadow, I am not touching that article as it was created as a WP:POINT example. I suggest you cut it out as such disruptions can cause you to be banned. I suggest you to work on the existing articles rather than creating new ones. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Okay, fine, Twy7, I get it. railway station articles stay, no matter their condition. References that don't support the text, completely unreferenced articles, the whole shebang. A review of my editing history will show that I have been working to improve the quality of existing articles. It just takes a lot of work to go through every reference. Thank you for help first and your warning second. Rhadow (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Rhadow, as I said, I think the articles need to be judged on a case by case basis. And I certainly don't think that the blanket comment that all station articles are notable is correct. I think let the first AFD and RFC run it's course. There are a few people supporting your view point, but creating articles to prove a point is disruptive and could see you getting a block, short or perminant. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Tyw7, so, ultimately, the threat of a block is the tool to ensure that the consensus that all railway station articles are notable. You have stepped out of the ring, I accept that. The second AfD was terminated prematurely; you described it as WP:POINTy. If a thousand edits on railway station articles doesn't establish some credibility, then the system is not working the way it should. Rhadow (talk) 13:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Rhadow, well WP:POINT means that article was purely created and then AFDed to prove a point that you are somehow correct.

That is certainly not a way to change consensus. Work within the system rather than out. And PS you have mispelt my name as twy7. I am tyw7. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, Tyw7. Rhadow (talk) 13:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Third chapter

Hello Tyw7, thank you for your thoughtful contributions to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hapa_Road_railway_station. While the result was no consensus, the back-and-forth exposed topics that deserve clarification in the essay Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations)#Stations or in the form of an RfC similar to [on secondary school notability]. Rhadow (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Tyw7. You have new messages at Talk:Main Page.
Message added 17:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

331dot (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

reverted only because it was un-needed

I reverted you at User talk:Jsusushdyeyshydtw only because a warning was already issued and deleted by the user. We don't need to repeat it. Thanks, though, for cracking down on vandals. Our editors work too hard to have their work defaced. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Chris troutman, ah OK. Did not see that. I thought a warning hasn't been issued. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion Sorting

Please see this discussion about deletion sorting: [4]. Your comments might be useful. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

You're still doing this....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

WilliamJE, excuse me? You do realize in that particular AFD I only added 4 categories. The other 7 is added by someone else. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion sorting

WP:AFD/USA reads 'This is a high level category for deletion sorting. Whenever possible, it is recommended for deletion discussions to be added to more specific categories, such as a state and/or relevant subject area.' If a AFD is already in some state deletion sorting, it does not go here too....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

WilliamJE, wasn't there an agreement that if the person lives in the US, they can be tagged in that catagory --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:40, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

• • You're not reading the page which also says-

This United States of America deletion sorting page may be used for the following types of articles:

• Topics and subjects that are U.S.-based, whereby the article does not provide a specific state of origin or where activity occurs

It goes in a state deletion sorting, not United States also....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

WilliamJE, I have asked at the talk page for clarification. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting#Actors_living_in_the_US --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Drafting dog

Don't you understand the difference between Google and Google books? The latter tends to get you quality results while the former gets you all the shit on the internet. SpinningSpark 20:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

My User Page

Undo what you did, or I'm reporting you. --Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated (talk) 11:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated, done --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Rocket stubs

I had no idea when you stated "what do you suggest doing then? There's a ton of stub articles on the Nike rocket family." that there were "literally" that many, also involving many different rocket articles.

I have begun to review and tag many, especially dictionary entry articles. I have even found some so ambiguous it is ridiculous like 1.5KS35000 and 1.9KS2150. A main problem I have is that many of these "articles" are just entries from Encyclopedia Astronautica (example: Malemute) that is many times the only source so there are clear notability issues. I have no idea how large a problem this actually is because I think I have been largely only working with sounding rockets so far. Otr500 (talk) 11:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Otr500, I was being cautious by not flooding the AFD with those stubs but I think a lot of them can be merged or deleted. But I don't know what would be the appropriate target. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

I have been looking around. Consensus at the discussion of Nike-Orion indicated merge to Nike (rocket stage). I am not convinced that would be the best location. The "booster" was used extensively in sounding rockets and is listed under Nike as sounding rocket in the Project Nike article. There are many other types (many dictionary entries), that are not Niki, that might benefit from a central location. Otr500 (talk) 01:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

A start is a start though as I see the Nike-Orion discussion came to the same conclusion. I can see where there can be some linking like with Nike-Malemute and Malemute. Otr500 (talk) 01:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Otr500, I think there should be some clean up done with the rocket stubs. I don't see much edit history on the stubs. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

I suppose there may be a downside to selectively seeking improvement, and "being cautious by not flooding the AFD" (which is commendable) but sometimes the same closer may not see the intent and we end up with the Nike-Viper/Viper Dart merge. I suppose it is an improvement but will likely still remain a dictionary entry like it has since 2005. Otr500 (talk) 03:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Discussion

There is an on-going discussion at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#Alternatives to deletion in which you may be interested. Otr500 (talk) 11:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for Kevin Falk page for delation

Hello! Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. Your the expert on if a page should be deleted or not. I will say that people still quite often get in touch with me from this page. Both bands mentioned here that I played in are still very much active. I was only trying to add a picture to it because there is also an adult actor with the same name and his picture was showing up when you googled my full name, Kevin Andrew Falk. I'm in the middle of a job hunt as we just moved to New Zealand so I didn't want potential employers to get confused with that adult actors picture instead of me.

Hopefully, this was informative.

I would prefer the page remain up. Thank you! -Kevin

--118.148.223.62 (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Hiya, it seems that page was deleted as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Falk. User talk:MB asked at the Articles for deletion page since his deletion request was failing.

That said I don't know what you want me to do. Maybe an admin can chime in as I feel that what you are requesting might require someone with admin permissions. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

The page was "soft deleted" meaning the deletion can be reversed on request. However, to do things properly, one of you should formally request undeletion at WP:REFUND.

If it turns out that I am the admin who handles the request (possible), I am likely to restore it but move it to the draft namespace as the article is very light on references and has been tagged as such since 2010. Note that so far as I know Google does not index the draft namespace. --kingboyk (talk) 04:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Popular culture sorting

You added two things to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Popular_culture which have nothing to do with popular culture. Look at that list to see what is normally put there. -- Dream Focus 17:17, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Dream Focus, I thought the chips are popular culture. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Its a food company. Why would that be popular culture? Also what about the plumbing thing you put in popular culture? Unless the article talks about popular culture, usually with "popular culture" in the name, then it doesn't belong there. Dream Focus 18:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

I thought popular culture is one where the public would be involved. Like the chip company could be well known in that community. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:18, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Apologies

Please accept my apologies for my unhelpful AfD comment - I understand the confusion in the names between Western Power & Western Power Corporation now. I have been a bit tired of AfDs where users do nothing but a Google search and conclude an article is not notable (which was not the case for you), I accept I was too quick to judge in your case. Bookscale (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Bookscale, no problem. I had a suspicion it could be notable but couldn't find the references to back it up to pass WP:GNG. And I couldn't find any guidelines that say power companies are inherently notable. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Image Icon

--JD Milburn (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC) Thank You

nominating on behalf of IP addresses

Why are you nominating things for deletion on behalf of a single purpose IP address? The people showing up to vote delete are banned sockpuppets, so the IP address used to get you to nominate things probably is as well. I don't see any reason why an IP address with no previous edits should ever be allowed to send nominate things for deletion. If the software keeps them from doing it themselves, there is a reason for that, you shouldn't do it for them. Dream Focus 05:55, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Dream Focus, well at that posting the IP wasn't banned. We don't have any president to check if the IP had edited before, at least none that I observed. Maybe raise a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはTyw7たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 02:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Artist's sort

Hello! Thank you so much for your sorting work at AfD. Just a heads up on minor detail: the artist's sort is only for visual artists. Musicians need not apply.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

ThatMontrealIP, ah gotcha. No problem. Thought musicians counted as artists. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Yeah the "artist's sort" is not ideally named! The requirements are at the top of its sort page. Thanks for all your excellent work, BTW.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Ecobranding

Wen you CSD'd Ecobranding, I had already started an AfD, and a CSD had been declined. Can we sort this out? Thanks, Vexations (talk) 12:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

It was declined? I say leave it up so an admin can compare the versions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Tyw7, Majavah requested speedy deletion (CSD G4, CSD G11) [5] on 16:41, 30 January 2020. Discospinster then declined speedy as not substantially identical [6] on 20:49, 30 January 2020 and suggested that another AfD would be necessary. I then brought it to AfD [7] on 21:07, 30 January 2020. You then re-nominated it for G4 on 02:11, 31 January 2020 [8]. I'd say we have already had an admin compare the versions. It should go to AfD, which is ongoing, but not linked from the article. Can you please agree to restore the AfD notice? Vexations (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Vexations, erm the AFD notice is there. At the bottom of the CSD notice. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:33, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Tyw7, OK, I'm just going to decline the CSD. Vexations (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Planet of the Dead.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Planet of the Dead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

AfD proxies

Hey hi howdy. I think you may be dipping your toes into a shark tank with the proxy nominations. Armenian nationalism POV pushing is a big problem here and this may be an example of it. Also, there's no reason except competence he can't do it himself. I'd never do that for anyone, but I think minimally if you are going to do it, you should only do so if the nomination is put together in a convincing manner (citation to policy for instance). Not a warning, just a suggestion. Every edit we make is supposed to improve the encyclopedia. I'm going to snow close the one on the bio. It's meritless. --John from Idegon (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

John from Idegon, well IP users can't start AFD and it's usually one of the registered editors that complete the registration for them. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Comparison of Nikon DSLR cameras

Digitect has asked for a deletion review of Comparison of Nikon DSLR cameras. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2020_April_24#Comparison_of_Canon_EOS_digital_cameras Digitect (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

CAPTAIN RAJU, thanks dude! --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

FYI

Please read WP:OWNTALK. HW is allowed to remove comments and warnings from their talkpage. Your restoring them can be considered WP:DISRUPTIVE and is not going to help anything. These situations are always tough and I can understand where you are coming from but please proceed with caution. You are certainly free to remove this post as well. MarnetteD|Talk 22:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

MarnetteD, I feel he's being disruptive by selectively removing criticisms. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

I understand that but, again, they are allowed to remove them. That is just the way things work around here. In spite of this please have a nice week and stay safe. MarnetteD|Talk 22:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Melton

You can't close or relist XFD discussions that you are involved in as per WP:CLOSEAFD and WP:AFD#Procedure for non-administrator close (other). Please revert your relist, thanks. Nfitz (talk) 02:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Nfitz, done --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Tyw7 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Chris troutman, thanks! --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Notability of populated places

I saw that you nominated a few populated places for deletion. Our standards for inclusion of populated places are deliberately very low. Any community that verifiably exists and/or is legally recognized automatically passes WP:GEOLAND - it does not matter if significant in-depth coverage exists. Any AfDs similar to the three you made on June 4 are likely to be WP:SNOW kept. Just a heads up. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 23:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

CactusJack, fair enough. I mostly think that WP:GNG is the minimum requirement to be notable but it seems GEOLAND bypasses GNG. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of Wayne Doty entry

Hi there

I got here after searching the name of a person who was the subject of a Netflix Special program. His name is Wayne Doty, and he’s a convicted double murderer awaiting execution on Florida’s death row. Not a nice individual.

I searched him up because I wanted to see if he’s still alive. I see that you’ve tagged his Wikipedia page for deletion because he’s not a notable person.

I disagree with this assertion. I think that anyone who has an hour-long Netflix special made about him is notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry. Not as notable as Stevie Wonder or Ghengis Khan, but surely a little bit notable. In addition, Doty is interesting to legal scholars because of his attempts to hasten his own execution and his rejection of legal counsel while doing so.

I respectfully submit that the deletion request for that Wikipedia page should be retracted.

Thanks Nik

--135.23.103.157 (talk) 09:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I was fulfilling the request at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Wayne_C._Doty.

What should I do with this request? The IP numbers are different. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tyw7: I think you are alright, nothing you need to do. @135.23.103.157: please put your objections on the article's AfD entry - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

• Somehow I got a ping from this message. I don't understand how or why, but I have actually got nothing to do with this discussion. Reyk _YO! 10:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

  Reyk, I accidentally transcluded the entire deletion talk page. Fixed it but the pings went out. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

  Oh, OK. Mystery solved. Reyk _YO! 11:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to British Rail Class 153, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I see no reason to disagree with the author of the image. David Biddulph (talk) 14:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

David Biddulph, whoops thought it was my pic that was used. Mine was of the FGW train --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Username message

There isn't anything wrong with you leaving the user with the username issue a message, just keep in mind that in eight years the user could have died, forgotten about the account, is using a different account, etc. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

331dot, I know but the message is there if they become active again. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

page don trialeon

not really good with this opetions on wiki am i know on talk option for wiki?if yes then why was the page Don Trialeon deleted? --Zippobg (talk) 21:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Zippobg, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Trialeon as to why your page was deleted. Based on the discussion, it seems that the article didn't provide reliable source. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

@Zippobg: Good Evening, the page for Don Trialeon was deleted following a discussion among editors where it was decided that it did not meet the criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The discusion can be found here. The ourtcome of the discussion was that the article did not provide suitable eveidence through reliable third party sources to show that it meet our criteria for inclusion. If you are able to provide the additional evidence we need that this would meet our criteria you can request it is restored by contacting an administrator who can reover this and move it to a location for you to develop before requesting the article is republished. If you have nay question please let me know so I can attempt to assist further Amortias (T)(C) 21:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

i see that some one said that you cant find stuff from him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lyvim9GTQg did you google him on youtube?

ps thats my older brother

--Zippobg (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Zippobg, pinging User:Amortias as he's an admin and can explain this more than I can.

But Youtube is not usually considered a reliable source. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Evening, what we need are multiple 3rd party independent sources writing about them, youtube is a user generated website - anyone can write/upload/comment on the site and as such this isnt normally considered a reliable source. We would be looking for mentions in mainstream media, reputable major publications in their fields or subject areas. Once we have these then they may be able to be included in the encyclopeida but this is not a guarnatee.

Can I also confirm your statement above ps thats my older brother refers to Don Trialeon being your older brother. If so you will need to read this and ensure that if editing anything related to him that you follow the guidance for declaring and editing where you have a conflict of interest.Amortias (T)(C) 20:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Broken archive box

My archive box seem to be broken. It does not show archive 3. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

You've been around for a long time, so I'll overlook how squirrely your setup is.

Your archive box is working exactly as it was designed to work, but it may have design aspects you are not aware of. In particular, you have a file named User talk:Tyw7/archivelist which is picked up automatically by the archive template and used instead of any automated search for your actual archive pages. As it says in the template doc: If a subpage called "{{PAGENAME}}/archivelist" exists, it will be used as the central content of the box.

This gives you a few options. Perhaps the easiest is to ask for that file to be deleted. The indexer is picking up all of your archives automatically, so if this file goes away, I expect the archives template will also find them. You will lose the customized naming you had set up, but I think that would be a good thing.

But if you disagree with it being a good idea, all you have to do is update the file with your new renaming scheme to include the new archive 3. And remember to update it in the future when the bot starts a new archive. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

CAPTAIN RAJU, thanks! --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipterygium

Quite old, but just noticed: "Language", "Literature, and "Animal"? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Well it's a species name so could be considered language(?). Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Maaybe, though the article is about the species and not its name. It's not related to literature in any case. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Thanks Mr. Turtle. 🐢 Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Including Steven Fernandez in the Biology AfD List?

Hello Tyw7, I just wanted to ask whether you meant to include the AfD for Steven Fernandez in the Biology AfD sorting list? I don't see the connection from reading the article. Thanks. NeverRainsButPours (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Whoops. I meant biography. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

On a related note, I'm afraid I only realised after responding to your UAA report that Stevenfernandez00 hasn't edited since 2020 and, so, I'm not sure what can be done now. I mean, a block would probably be unwarranted as a purely punitive measure and the article is currently at WP:AfD, where its fate will be decided... Salvio 20:30, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Alert for discretionary sanctions applied to living people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Auto indexing and LINT

Hello! You probably saw that I just fixed a couple of WP:LINT errors on User:Tyw7/talkheader. I also wanted to let you know that in this edit to your talk page, I have removed {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn}} from your talk page, as your index page is working through Lua, but having the template makes this page show up on User:Legobot/Index errors. Best, HouseBlaster^talk 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Didn't notice a difference though. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of SALt lamp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SALt lamp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SALt lamp (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

99% fad-free (talk) 10:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

"Template:Retired2" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:Retired2 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 27 § Template:Retired2 until a consensus is reached. Awesome Aasim 20:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/participants/retired

Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/participants/retired, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/participants/retired and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/participants/retired during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Awesome Aasim 20:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)