User talk:RHaworth/2017 Nov 14

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Mike Stuchbery's Photo

File:Mike Stuchbery 02.jpg

Ravensburg, Baden-Württemberg

• Benedict, to satisfy my curiosity please add to the description of File:Mike Stuchbery 02.jpg details of where it was taken. At a guess I would say it is some charming town in Germany which was flattened by allied bombing and lovingly recreated. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Done :) It was Ravensburg, Baden-Württemberg. Best, Benedict VividImpression (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks, it made a vivid impression on me. But in fact it was one of the few places that escaped bombing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

What does a move do?

Newbie to Wikipedia procedures here. Test subpage was moved, then deleted. Hello, I made a test user subpage yesterday using the instructions on the Wikipedia "User Pages" help page, just to see if it would work. Decided to use it to keep notes on pages I'm looking at (i.e. notes on what needs to be fixed). As far as I know. this is an acceptable use of a user subpage. Took me awhile to figure out the formatting language, but I finally finished putting my info on the subpage. Then I saw that someone else moved it, and that you subsequently deleted it (LOL). However, I can still see the page, including the new info. Not that big of a deal since I can always make another, but am quite confused. Do I need to make another page, or was it rescued from deletion once I added info to it? Any help you can give would be appreciated. Thanks! ~ Big universe (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, figured out that the page was moved because I forgot to add "User:" to the page before creating it, so it was created in the "mainspace" instead of my "userspace." But still don't know why the "deleted" page and the info are still visible. Not a concern, though, as long as I can still see/use it. Looked at the link you provided for "Cross-namespace redirects". Not quite sure how this relates to my user subpage, since there were no redirects of any kind involved AFAIK. Perhaps I am misreading or misunderstanding something? Don't want to keep making mistakes resulting from preventable ignorance. Thanks for your time ~ Big universe (talk) 04:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

• Big universe, look at the log and the timestamps! That which I deleted was the cross-namespace redirect created when Trivialist moved big universe/imagetest to user:big universe/imagetest. None of your edits have been deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey there, RHaworth, thanks for the reply! It DID actually occur to me that that might have been the case. Glad for the confirmation. But...didn't quite know how to phrase it well enough to note it on your page (which could have caused further time-wasting confusion, LOL). Decided it was better not to say anything, since my page was still up.

However, your succinct explanation (in addition to what I'd already figured out) has helped me to fully visualize: 1) the complete process of what happened and what needs to be done to correct it; 2) how the "spaces" of Wikipedia are organized and structured relative to each other; and 3) exactly what the heck a "cross-namespace redirect" is (LOL), and how it works. So, thanks for that! Being a newbie sucks. [:(] Quickly piecing together bits of info strewn across different Wiki pages can be time-consuming and confusing--especially after one sees the word "deleted"! There's just no substitute for experience, which only comes with time. *sigh*

Anyway, thanks again & sorry for the inconvenience! ~ Big universe (talk) 21:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Black Community Programmes Entry

Good day, I posted a page on Wikipedia sandbox on the Black Community Programmes facilitated by the Black Consciousness Movement in South Africa. After I had posted, I received a notification that the article had been deleted. It is alleged that the entry is an unambiguous copyright infringement of this page however, I have attributed the source and tried to tell the same story but in a different way. Please assist me in highlighting how entry can be improved to meet the required copyright regulations. Thank you very much. The entry was deleted on my sandbox. Regards. Azola Dayile (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

• Azola, put the page at sahistory out of sight and create a new version via AfC entirely in your own words. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mord Fustang

Hello RHaworth. Today I came across this article. I thought about accepting it, but then I saw it was protected since 2015 due to non-notable. As far I can see, the current version is made by another user (@Zawl:). I would like to know if the current version differs from the old deleted page, and if page protection can be lifted if the version differs. Regards, » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 18:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

• Your wording should have distinguished between the draft space article and the mainspace one. That the latest version was created by an established user, is good enough for me. I have removed protection from the mainspace title. I have restored the deleted versions in draftspace. If you are really interested, once you have done the move, let me know and I will restore all the deleted edits. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Why did you delete "uSTEM" page?

Please I would like to know the reasons why you deleted the uSTEM page I created even though I specified the general importance of the page for the Wikipedia users. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gallo.federico (talk • contribs)

Some editor tagged it for deletion and this admin accepted the request "13:39, 29 September 2017 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page USTEM(A7: Article about an eligible subject, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)" If you want it restored you need to explain how the topic meets WP:N. Cheers, Legacypac (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Holy shit. I had to double take. You again. As I live and breathe, the guy who deleted Barska Optics when I was attempting to research them has struck again! The second time I've tried to locate information on a company and you're here to rain shit on the knowledge-seeking parade. Small world, Haworth, eh? No surprise, considering you apparently do nothing other than remove information from an informational-based website. You literally have a disclaimer on your talk page regarding disgruntled editors directing you to ALL OF THE DELETED ARTICLES THAT YOU HAVE DELETED BECAUSE YOU CAN'T EVEN KEEP TRACK OF THEM ALL. Would you perhaps take some advice? Maybe stop deleting articles for once and do us all a solid; Create one instead. — The Cake is a Lie ^{T / C} 12:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

• Cake, interesting co-incidence. I saw uSTEM nominated again for deletion and intentionally left it to give you the chance to launch a vitriolic attack on Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) as well. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

The problem with something like uSTEM is that our sourcing requirements for medical articles are very high, and we can't accept an article on a stem cell research organisation unless there is strong evidence to peer-review journals. The article as I found it also seemed to be over-promoting the language with phrases such as "4 years of R&D have allowed to develop a reprogramming method based on microtechnologies...", "One of the most important consequences of this discovery is the possibility to derive large-scale patients..." and "Being able to develop ad hoc therapies for each patient leads the way for a personalised medicine that takes into account the specificity of the individual". The article would therefore need a rewrite using multiple citations to peer-reviewed journals (more than the handful that were present in the article when I deleted it) to be a suitable encyclopedia topic. — Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• Ritchie, I'm baffled as to the idea of how having literally no information is better than marketed information. Also, I was just taking the opportunity to say a well deserved "thank you" to this champion of wisdom, Hayworth, who apparently spends his entire life removing knowledge from Wikipedia so much so that I have bumped into him again from a previous deleted article on Barska Optics. The Cake is a Lie ^{T / C} 03:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

• Ritchie, The Cake did not deserve your detailed reply. The Cake is little better than a troll and clearly has no concept of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Why delete gas immersion laser doping?

There was no copyright infringing material on the page, I don't see the justification for speedy deletion under G12. What was the justification for this, please explain. Screenshot of page before deletion: https://i.imgur.com/19z7Wv9.jpg -- Pavithran (talk) 17:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

I also need to add that it was that PDF book that copied Wikipedia and not vice versa! If ou had even bothered to look through the references section of the book (Page 227), you woud see that the source is attributed to ME and Wikipedia: https://i.imgur.com/jmWVT3R.jpg -- Pavithran (talk) 17:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

• I see you have re-created it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Just as a heads up, I came upon this discussion while de-orphaning the above-noted article (was looking into what links to it) and have undeleted the prior history as it appears Pavithran was correct in saying the G12 does not apply. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

PDOldenburger

I noticed that a userpage that you deleted per G11, PDOldenburger, has been recreated. I'm not sure it's the same as what you deleted or not, so you may want to have a look. — Deli nk (talk) 12:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Deleted and blocked. — Alex Shih^Talk 13:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Dexta Daps

Please sir, I'm thinking if you could help me recover this article Dexta daps someone deleted it and I want to work on it again. — Sshhaaxx (talk) 09:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

• Text emailed. Note that Daps should have a capital D. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you sir...i'v seen it! i will work on it again. Sshhaaxx (talk) 11:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Tower Destroyed.png

Hello Roger. I believe that you removed my screenshot of Clash Royale for a Copyvio. I believe that you did this in error, because on the official Supercell policy for Fan Content, it mentions that you are free to use media of Clash Royale as long as you are not defaming their brand. I have restored the file (different screenshot) ensuring it falls within their content guidelines. I have also written a more appropriate Fair Use Rationale for the file. If you have any questions, please drop me a line on my talk page. — LionWaffles (talk) 03:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• Ten minutes after leaving the above message you re-uploaded. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Asahi-ekimae-d?ri Station

Hi; please restore Talk:Asahi-ekimae-d?ri Station - it is necessary for the links in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Articles and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All to work. JMHamo (talk · contribs) should have checked "what links here" before putting {{db-talk}} on it. At the very least they should have asked me why I created it. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

This edit won't work for more than 52 minutes or so, for precisely the same reason that I described at User talk:Rhadow#Editing RfC listings. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

• Now fixed to your satisfaction? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Rungta Group of Colleges

Previously I was created an article named Rungta Group of Colleges which is a group of educational institutions located in Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India. This article should be published because people are confused with similar names of institutions such as Rungta Group Of Institutions (Santosh Rungta Group of Institutions), both are different groups of educational institutions but are considered as same, so to solve the confusion i want to publish Rungta Group of Colleges (Sanjay Rungta Group of Institutions) with a strong source and all the bugs fixed. Rungta Group of Colleges is popularly known as Sanjay Rungta Group of Institutions. sources http://www.rungtacolleges.com. This group owns 4 (four) degree college which are - RSR Rungta College of Engineering and Technology, GD Rungta College of Engineering & Technology, Rungta College of Dental Sciences & Research, Rungta College of Science & Technology which are located in Bhilai, India at same campus. — Sumitsharaf (talk) 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

• Your article was too short to be viable. Try again via AfC and create a decent, properly referenced article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

• May I point out that you already created articles for the four colleges:Rungta College of Science & Technology, Rungta College of Dental Sciences & Research, RSR Rungta College of Engineering and Technology and GD Rungta College of Engineering & Technology. I had to spend hours on removing all the crud. What would be the point of Rungta Group of Colleges? I will keep WP:AGF but this starts to smell like WP:PAID. -- Muhandes (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Lost in Space

Hi RHaworth. You've already deleted File:Chariot Images from lost in Space (2018).jpg once per WP:F7, but the uploader has simply uploaded it again. I'm not sure the uploader quite understands why the file was deleted the first time. Nothing has really change from before, except now the uploader seems to be claiming copyright ownership of each of the individual images, which would mean that the uploader could simply release all the photos under a free license including the collage itself per WP:FREER. In addition, the uploader seems to be trying to use the collage to verify certain article content, but images (especially non-free images) are not really suitable as citations, even more so in this case because the source would be totally user-generated original research. There seems to be a deeper lack of understanding here of WP:V and WP:RS that goes beyond WP:NFCCP. Anyway, I was going to tag it again with {{db-f7}}, but I'd figure I ask you first. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

I've asked Jcb, the Commons admin who originally deleted the individual photos as copyvios, to clarify the source which was given for them. Jcb does not have the tools to see deleted Wikipedia files, but can see files deleted from Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

The files at Commons were uploaded with: source=The Internet, author=The Internet. Images were very low res (640x360). If uploader would contact OTRS, I would request them to send us the original pictures from their camera for verification. I don't think they are the author. — Jcb (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

• Source=The Internet, author=The Internet is ridiculous. The images in the first composite that I deleted were larger - 1800 px wide - so it is just possible that they are the work of RokkoRokkoRokkanno (talk · contribs) but until they comply with Jcb's request we cannot tell. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for clariying things Jcb. The file was deleted a second time by RHaworth. Anyway, if the uploader did not take the individual photos, they would be treated as protected by copyright unless they can be verified to have been released under a free license by the copyright holder or are in the public domain for some reason. This means they need to be treated as non-free, but a non-free user created collage is almost never allowed, especially when proper sourcing information is not provided for the copyright verification of each element of the collage: I don't think "author = The Internet" and "source = The Internet" is not going to be enough per WP:NFCC#4 and WP:NFCC#10a. In addition, the same basic file was uploaded as File:Chariot Image Sequence.jpg, but this would have no real encyclopedic value at all as currently reduced even if there were no other NFCCP problems with it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Asan Khedmat wikipedia page

Dear Sir, I am working for the government organization in Afghanistan, called Asan Khedmat. Recently I created a wikipedia page for our organization, however, it has been deleted by you. I understand, probably there has not been any links provided as a quote to back up the information provided on this specific page. We are trying to recreate the page adding necessary quotes and sources to back up the story/article. How can I proceed to create a page with the same name? Thanks Masouda PR specialist Asan Khedmat / Afghanistan masouda.afzali@asan.gov.af — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muska Amin (talk • contribs) 11:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

First, please see our Terms of Use WP:Paid given you're connected to them and, then also see WP:What Wikipedia is not as the deleted page suggested a misuse of Wikipedia for profiling the organization itself. SwisterTwister talk 16:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who a) knows how to do something as simple as creating an external link and b) has no CoI thinks your organisation is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Danish Sait

Would you consider possibly undeleting this? You deleted it G5, but the creator actually isn't blocked as an Orangemoody sock, and I've just closed the SPI with no action (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orangemoody). ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

• Done. Wikieditorksd please note. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Why Melissa Roxburgh?

Hi, I wanted to find out why Melissa Roxburgh's article was deleted before I continue with what am writing. — Chabota Kanguya (talk) 06:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

• Learn to create a link whenever you talk about a page. Your draft is already longer than any of the unreferenced stubs that have been created in the past. Clearly it stands no chance at present because there are no independent references but if you can provide them, feel free to go ahead. To be on the safe side submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

RHaworth, thats is how I write all my articles I always put the refs at the end when I want to publish it. I just wanted to know if there was an special reason as to why it has been deleted 3 times. Chabota Kanguya (talk) 12:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Self-Directed Education

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Self-Directed Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-Directed Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 12:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Restore Pegasus Theatre, Dallas

I would appreciate being given an opportunity to edit a page you deleted overnight User:Akedzier/Pegasus Theatre, Dallas to make it compliant. I feel the information contained within was for the most part historical, referential, and consistent with other pages describing the works of non-profit arts organizations and their founders. Regards, Akedzier (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

• As a Thespian myself, I have a certain sympathy so despite your blatant CoI, I have restored the page. Note that it stands no chance of long term survival in its present state: totally devoid of evidence of notabilty. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Access to Deleted Article - Monoeyes

Hello, Could you please send me the article code for the deleted article Monoeyes? My goal is to add additional sources and enhance it so it meets the notability criteria. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thompson781 (talk • contribs)

• Please learn: to sign talk page comments, to provide a link when you talk about a page, that Scott Murphy is not a member of the band and that shouting is vandalism. Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Here's fore saving my girl's p****. — Boyscout27 (talk) 15:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC) I have no idea what you are talking about. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Clauritzen/sandbox

Hello. I only removed the csd notice so the folks at the edu notice board could see what I was talking about. I'm pretty sure they have, and no longer need it. AS it was not a decline of the csd, I see no reason not to honor the WP:CSD#U5 now. Let me know if I should not have deleted it.19:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

• No complaints. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Breaking oF the Iran Nuclear Deal

Hi, I'm the creator of the deleted article named Breaking oF the Iran Nuclear Deal. I wonder if you sent me whole text of that article to improve it. At that day my time was limited, so the article was written at Minimum possible time. If the article had specific problem that I must have removed it, Please point out me. Regards! Saff V. (talk) 10:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

I have done what you asked! — Saff V. (talk) 07:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

• Emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Fat chance

Dear Mr Haworth, I am contacting you re the article I have submitted few weeks ago (Draft:International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders). I would like to kindly ask your guidance on how to provide sources that could improve the possibility of my article to be published on Wikipedia. I did read the suggestions provided, but I am not a native English speaker and I am afraid I didn't understand well what I should do. IFSO is an international federation of bariatric surgeons. Our mission is to improve the quality of care of obese patients. IFSO is a non-profit organization. I thank you very much in advance for your guidance. Best regards, Manuela Mazzarella — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manuelaifso (talk • contribs) 13:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello, @Manuelaifso:. Jumping in to say that mission statements are promotional by nature and have no place in a Wikipedia article. Such content can lead to deletion under WP:CSD#g11. As to sourcing, you must discard personal knowledge of the subject. You will need to find sourcing in journals, magazines, newspapers, etc. If someone has written a book about the subject, that would help. WP:RS has more information about that. RHaworth can give you more info on looking for sourcing. — Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

PS. Social media are right out. Also, the subject's webpage cannot be considered a reliable source by which to establish notability. Hope this helps. — Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

• "Give you more info on looking for sourcing" - you cannot be serious. Manuelaifso, kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your organisation is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

FuGENE

Can you please userfy me FuGENE as I believe it passes GNG so I'd like to take a look at reinstating it. It has been several years since I saw the article but I don't recall it being unambiguously promotional back then. Thanks. - Pontificalibus (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

• Restored to draft:FuGENE but I am dubious about whether "gene" has any right to be in capitals. Note that we do not need ®. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Ok, once I have excluded sponsored research by the manufacturer I have two sources discussing in detail, and thousands of briefer mentions. Someone might get an article out of this but not me, so what I've done is basically merge the useful stuff to Transfection#Chemical-based_transfection. I think FuGENE should redirect there (caps per the reliable sources) with the history restored? What do you reckon? --Pontificalibus (talk) 15:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

AIS Auto Insurance Specialists

You deleted my page. The editors all said my sources were unverifiable. They were Bloomberg News, LA Times, Insurance Journal and other such reputable and national publications. I was also told the tone was salesy so I edited it to neutral but was repeatedly told it's not neutral. I then mentioned that as an editor (I edit fiction manuscripts) I know neutral from sales and was pretty sure my edits changed that. I was then accused of being paid by AIS (again, I edit manuscripts). I then defended myself and showed them the Wikipedia page for Mercury Insurance (which owns AIS) and said I'd written it in the same model. Then my article got deleted. I mean, I carry Mercury Insurance. Will that page be deleted now? I'm not trying to be difficult but I feel like everyone is telling me the same thing which is just not true. Can you please at least retrieve teh article and point out how I'm missing a neutral tone. At this point, it's just making me batty because I really did try to fix that. I also have other things I want to contribute and really feel like everyone there just wants to bat down my articles with any excuse and there's no attempt to help. Please help, don't just shoo me away. Afarin Majidi (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

• You do not deserve it but someone has restored your page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

User talk

Can you delete all the edits done by me on my talk page User_talk:Greenbörg. I have intention to change my name for privacy reasons and want to delete my signed posts. Greenbörg (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

• Sorry, looks like a lot of work. Put in a request at WP:AN. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Territorial evolution of the World

I would like you to unprotect this page because there is a double redirect problem and it needs to be fixed. In case, there is any concerns in the future with IP editors, this page could be reduced to semi-protected but I don't see any need to having to keep full protection on this page. It has been protected for the past 8 years. — Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Also, please unprotect Territorial Evolution of the World for the same reasons. — Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

• I have fixed the double redirect. Before I unprotect, I would like an assurance from Spesh531 (talk · contribs) that they will not create a new fork on the title. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

• Whatever my motives were 8 years ago were absolutely childish (being 12 in 2009), so do whatever needs to be done. — SPESH531Other 18:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

• Unprotected. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of "Terra2 Solutions"

Dear Mr. Haworth, I've just finished working on a Wikipedia page for Terra2 Solutions so people are able to learn more about it should they wish. I'm new to the Wikipedia community and am wanting to do my best in following the guidelines of the content that can be published here. I see that you've removed my page due to "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion." That was in no way my intention, so I was wondering if you'd be able to quickly take the time in letting me know what exactly it was that you considered to be promotion — which I now understand is completely viable — but I just wanted a second opinion.

Furthermore, I now no longer have access to any of the content that I spent quite a while writing myself. I remember seeing a form somewhere where I could file for the content to be returned to me, but have since not been able to find said form. Would you mind pointing me in the right direction in trying to retrieve all of the work I put into writing that article? I wanted to keep whatever could be kept and just edit anything that goes against Wikipedia's content guidelines, which I will definitely read more thoroughly (especially in terms of advertising/promotion) before resubmission. Thank you in advance, Edwardfraser (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

• The best advice I can give is: kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. But you may have your text - read this. If you insist on re-submitting, do so via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Why the hell did you delete my sandbox?

I was working on a project VERY important. AND I HAVE LOST ALL OF THE WORK BECAUSE YOU DELETED IT. WHY? There was nothing wrong with it. LITERALLY it was just Dancing with the Stars formatted tables. This was a important project. GIVE ME ONE GOOD REASON WHY YOU DELETED THIS WITHOUT TALKING TO ME! — Musicalorange6 (talk) 23:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

@Musicalorange6: (talk page stalker) What's this important project about? Predicting the future for Dancing with the Stars? Please be aware that you don't own anything on Wikipedia, not even your sandbox, they are still subject to policies. — Alex Shih (talk) 03:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is not recovered. EVERYTHING. Including the history. I am reporting your account. You deleted all of my hard work FOR NOTHING. Fuck you. — Musicalorange6 (talk) 23:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

More Beer. — Naraht (talk) 15:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

• I am a card-carrying member of CAMRA so I have replaced the picture of a stein with a ridiculous head (see higher up this page) - it's not called "export hell" for nothing! - with a proper beer glass - note that it is marked "pint to line" not "pint to rim".

Your puzzlement expressed here is one of those subtle technical problems which I relish. I am always happy when I am down in the (hex) dumps! In the original post the character following the — is A0 hex, ie. a standard ASCII space (20 hex) but with the top bit set. Most browsers treat it as a non-breaking space so the change that happened in this edit was valid and harmless. The puzzle is why your edit triggered the change and not one of the half dozen edits that preceded it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Reviving Category:Solo piano jazz albums

I'm considering reviving Category:Solo piano jazz albums. Up pops this alert, telling me that I should contact you, who deleted it in 2013. The discussion (actually, only the nominator contributed) is here and the nominator's alternative proposal was to keep Category:Solo guitar jazz albums and Category:Solo piano jazz albums as sub-categories. Having the solo piano jazz one would be useful, as it's a type of recording that some people are interested in and they would like to be able to find more of the same by looking at one page. Please advise on the best course of action. — EddieHugh (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

• Do whatever you want. If you restore, I will not touch it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Restore a student article to userspace?

Hi RHaworth, I was wondering if you would be willing to move Bcahillc/sandbox to User:Bcahillc/sandbox. This was part of a student assignment and I believe that I can work with them some more to get the content to fit guidelines. My goal is to make it less promotional and to encourage them to add it to the main Adidas article rather than as its own article. Thanks! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi! I have another one - a student accidentally posted a review to Talk:Digital Divide in Philippines. Would it be possible for you to move it to the student's userspace at User:MadelineDeLeo/sandbox/Digital Divide in Philippines? I've told the student to be more cautious in the future via e-mail. I didn't want to do this with my main account since this is work related and wanted this to be on the up and up. — Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

• Restored to Draft:Adidas and Parley and User talk:MadelineDeLeo. Re the latter: would it not be useful to also restore the article that Madeline was reviewing? I will do so if you tell me where it is! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! I've let the professor and students know. As for the talk page deletion, it looks like there was never an article there, so I'm unsure as to what they were reviewing. — Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

• Shalor, a tiny bit of research would have told you that she was probably reviewing User:Carolinelowry/sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lil Pump

Could you please restore the page as the content in it was much more updated with content and better sourced so I can update the content on the Gazzy Garcia page? Thank you BAPreme _{(T | C)} 21:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

• Restored to the history of Lil Pump. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for cleaning up my page-move mess. — Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Just wanted to draw your attention to this discussion at AN/I, in case you'd not seen it, according to which User:Candice.jones0601/sandbox (which you deleted as G12) is not actually a copyvio of an external site. It probably is still a copyvio of another page on Wikipedia so you might like to discuss with the user what she'd like done with it. — GoldenRing (talk) 16:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

• Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Lil Pump

The page is protected for only admins? BAPreme _{(T | C)} 16:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@Bapreme: No. — fortunavelut luna 13:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

• Oops! Sorry. Now unprotected. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Respected sir

Three years back i mistake my wikipedia editing process u will be blocked in my account,now i want used my account but not used please unblock my account sir.iam not continue in my mistake sir. — M.Ethirajalu MLC (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

• It is known as shooting yourself in the foot. That particular account had never been protected until today when, by bringing it to our attention, you got it blocked. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:ShawMinutes.pdf

Hi, I woke up this morning to find that File:ShawMinutes.pdf had been nominated for SD and deleted by you, all within 38 minutes while I slept. Except when there is some need for urgency (BLP violation, copyvio, etc) you should allow a reasonable time for the uploader to contest the deletion. That file is required for a talk page discussion on an important aspect of the article that comes up from time to time. The source of the scan is long out of copyright. Please undelete the file so that the talk page discussion is complete again. Thanks. Zero^talk 02:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Also, I am dubious that scanned text is a non-media file in the meaning of WP:F10. Zero^talk 02:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• Zero, restored but just after restoring it, I realised that it is in the wrong place. It should be in Wikisource. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll move it. Zero^talk 01:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Boxing

WP:AFC/R#Redirect request: Universal Boxing Federation. Since you protected this page in 2016, it's  On hold since 31 August 2017 at the link above. 83.31.1.191 (talk) 10:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• List of boxing organisations is hopeless listcruft but you can have your redirect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Bhumibol

Draft:Thai royal cremation for His Majesty the late King Bhumibol Adulyadej. You have decided to delete this article that I was written on Nov 2, 2017 I accept your decision if you think of it repeatedly. But I want to clarify to you. Most of the information is derived from "The Committee on Public Relations for the Royal Cremation of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej" The media and public relations get both of Thai and english files, so Everyone is allowed to publish it if is not for commerial purposes. So you website as you referred to, is not the original. [1] They took from the source which I mentioned above as well. I would like to inform you that pattayamail is only a local news agency. Everyone can access to The Committee on Public Relations for the Royal Cremation of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej and get file to publish. [2]

I learn about Digital marketing from University in USA, one of the assignment was to create/edit wikipedia. I checked that no one wrote this. And now it is open to both Thai and foreign tourists who are interested in visiting for free because the end of this month the government will be dismantled. Give me a file as you deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onoh1 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

• Oh No! Learn wikilinks and that naked URLs are obscene. Even viewed defocussed, one could see that your page was likely to be unsuitable: horrible <h1> heading and section titles marked bold when they already are. Text emailed. If you repost, explain why it is not a copyvio on the talk page and point to that explanation from an HTML comment in the text and from the edit summary of the first edit. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Requests for userpages deletion

Hello, RHaworth, I created these pages to develope articles. Now these pages have been moved to article space. Now these pages are just redirects to main space articles. These are not needed anymore. All of these pages were created by me. I request you to delete these pages.

• User:Don'twasteTime/Coastline of Somalia
• User:DonotwasteTime/Nazli (actress)
• User:U/Sawan
• User:Don'twasteTime/Coast of Makran
• User:DonotwasteTime/Coastal Pakistan
• User:DonotwasteTime/Khakifa Sall

Thank you very much for your time. Don'twasteTime 08:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, RHaworth, I requested you deletion of somepages and you did that. Thank you very much for that!

I am developing an article at User:DonotwasteTime/Water problems in Zambia. User:DonotwasteTime does not exist. So please restore the page at User:Don'twasteTime/Water problems in Zambia. Thanks for your time. Don'twasteTime 01:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

• Donotpostdrafts to the user pages of non-existent or unconnected users. 99.5% edit summaries! So what? Even God is not perfect. Water restored to the edit history of User:Don'twasteTime/sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Christine Hogarth article you deleted

Hi, the article had 3 RS from which content came. I hope you will reconsider. — Magicmondays (talk) 03:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Per "If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator" which is you. Please advise how you will get the material to me. — Magicmondays (talk) 03:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Re: your speedy deletion of Christine Hogarth. — Magicmondays (talk) 03:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

• Learn to provide links when you talk about pages. If you had not been so impatient, I would have told you to go to DRV. But escalating it to ANI has had the same effect. "Please advise how …" - read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Respectfully, I think it was your impatience to delete within the first day of the article's attempted creation. Or, you could have provided the DRV link or at least some kind of note on my talk page when you deleted it. Also, how can I provide links when the article, as well as my contributions to it, have all disappeared? See "Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation." at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. So, I'm hoping you can see this from my side and reverse the speedy deletion if you have the authority to. Magicmondays (talk) 15:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Maths Time Joy

Hi Roger, Hope you're well. I saw you deleted the page I just created for the artist / producer Maths Time Joy. While I understand this is a re-creation of an article that has been deleted numerous times before, I urge you to reconsider. I have spent many hours collecting info to use as citations and make sure that everything I wrote is factual and can be backed up by evidence. You say that this person is not notable, however he is actually a very in-demand music producer in the UK and many reputable press companies have written about him. He has done remixes for artists like Bon Iver and Ellie Goulding and has produced tracks for Snakehips, Bebe Rexha and Mary J Blige. His productions and his own work have over 30 million streams on Spotify, YouTube and Apple Music.

I really feel like his page belongs on Wikipedia and I'd love you to reconsider this deletion. Please let me know any reservations you have. James — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslightfoot92 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

• So which of your references were in-depth articles about the guy himself? Text emailed. Resubmit via AfC if you must. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Roger. Please could you help me find the code from the page that was deleted? I put quite a few hours into it and would like to get it back if possible please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslightfoot92 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

• Text emailed again. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Repeated copyvio

Hi. You deleted File:Image.Jpg and File:Rebecca Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film In 2014.Png as unambiguous copyvio yesterday. User has reuploaded as File:"Rebecca"Attending Audio Launch Of Her Film in 2014.Png. I've tagged it again, but this user seems very persistent. They've been warned several times about copyvio, but either don't understand, don't want to understand, or don't care. I wonder if the user might need some admin intervention to get them to stop. -- Begoon 20:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

• Dealt with. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

  Thank you. Unfortunately they returned after the block with more copyvio. I pinged you on the talkpage:[3], but leaving this courtesy note. Thanks for your help. -- Begoon 11:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Lift creation protection on Manka Dhingra

Now Manka Dhingra has been elected to the Washington State Senate. We should have an article on her. The protection is making it difficult to create such article. Thank you. Ueutyi (talk) 09:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

• Despite multiple creations, draft:Manka Dhingra is not yet salted. Create the article there. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Please review, draft has been created. Ueutyi (talk) 06:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Requesting unprotection of Manka Dhingra. It was salted due to an AfD decision a few months ago. It at the time failed notability guidelines since he was just a candidate. However, the person has now won a state-wide election which meets the WP:NPOL standard. Draft:Manka Dhingra is ready to be published. Thanks. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

• Unprotected. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

2 Requests

1. As you mentioned above, I have 99.5% edit summaries. It was just a mistake that I made while leaving a message at User talk:Divy(a)95. There I forgot to leave an edit summary. xtools count only live edits. If you delete the messege that I left at User talk:Divy(a)95, then I shall have 100% edits with summaries. Therefore, I request you to delete that edit.
2. Please delete User:Don'twasteTime/Coast of Colombia. Don'twasteTime 15:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

• That was a waste of time. Drmies (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

• Time Waster, re this edit: please explain why you placed a space between each character. Also, if it had been properly formatted, it would not have shown the proper deletion reason. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

• RHaworth, If you delete that edit, I shall get 100 percent edits with summary.

Reason of space between each character is a problem. Every template appears in my device with space between every two characters. Don'twasteTime 01:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Riverton Lock at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Audrey Brown-Pereira (previously deleted)

I am creating articles during the month of November for women from Oceania and was going to create one for Audrey Brown-Pereira. I saw that the page had been previously deleted by you and I wanted to ensure that in creating it again I didn't run into any problems. Would it be possible to see the content of the previously created page? Thanks in advance! Slafayette (talk) 10:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

• Restored to Draft:Audrey Brown-Pereira. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks, much appreciated! I'll rewrite the draft and submit once well sourced & issues are addressed. Slafayette (talk) 13:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Why coulndn't Espresso Vivace go to AfD?

Can you explain why Espresso Vivace could not have been allowed go to Afd for discussion? I posted twice on the talk page explaining why it met the notability criteria, and I gave valid reasons. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:41, 11

• All better now. Thank you! —Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Riverton Lock

Hello! Your submission of Riverton Lock at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Subject : Bradley Charvet personnal webpage

Hi,

I have just wrote my bio in french about what I did, why I have been in the newspaper and everyone need to know our fabulous story.

Why did you delete it? Can i make it a new one in french?

Regards