Speedy deletion nomination of User:Musicalorange6/sandbox edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Musicalorange6/sandbox, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, harassing other users.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • I was going to just give you a short block for posting this and this to RHaworth's talk page, as that can be seen as you harassing another user and threatening them because they did something that was within guidelines to do. However a look at your talk page history shows that you have had multiple, MULTIPLE warnings about adding content that was not suitable for Wikipedia (such as bios on nn people, copyrighted images, etc) and have been told multiple times to stop this behavior - yet you continued on despite these warnings. You even created the page for Ciera Eastin twice after it was deleted at AfD, despite clear indication that it was not suitable. You had more than enough warnings about creating pages for nn people that you should have been already aware of the criteria for notability and that creating these pages was seen as disruptive, yet you continued. Your userpage has been deleted three times for containing fake DWTS rankings, so you also had more than enough warning that this was not acceptable either. When RHaworth deleted your page, he was well within his rights to do this and you responded by cursing him out on his talk page and threatening to report him.
I'm sorry, but in order to regain editing privileges you'd have to not only show that you are aware of what you did wrong, but you'd have to show that you would not continue with these habits, show how you'd edit Wikipedia in a beneficial manner, and that you could collaborate well with others. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Respond edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Musicalorange6 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Tokyogirl79, I understand now that you can't use your sandbox as a sandbox. It needs to be an edit that will be used for an actual page. I didn't know this, I am relatively new to editing on Wikipedia so I had never heard of this rule. I was working on a "fan" season of DWTS. So imagine if you didn't know of this rule and got no warnings about using my sandbox wrong. You would be frustrated as well. As for the Ciera Eastin pages. That was a long time ago and I haven't done that in months. The copyright images was a mistake if you read the full talk pages and from then on out I didn't do it. I read through the rules so this wouldn't happen again. I just want to edit on Wikipedia again. I put my fan season of DWTS on a wikia http://dancing-with-the-stars-fan-seasons6.wikia.com/wiki/Dancing_with_the_Stars:_26. My sandbox will only be testing edits for Big Brother, DWTS and Survivor. I will no longer put random stuff in my sandbox. I am sorry and am willing to work with this Wikipedia format. Much Love Musicalorange6 (talk) 23:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sorry for the late reply; apparently your unblock request was malformed. That said, either you're relatively new, or your edits were a long time ago. Pick one. Also, you removed some 50k bytes' worth of warnings, including one that said, "this is not fan fiction". And none of this addresses your conduct when your fan fiction was deleted. "Frustration" is not an excuse for cursing other editors. Huon (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Big Brother Canada contestants edit

 Template:Big Brother Canada contestants has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply