Open main menu

User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus

Stock post message.svg To-do:

Quelccaya Ice Cap, Laguna del Maule (volcano), Huaynaputina, Uturuncu, El Tatio, Lake Ptolemy, AD 1500 tsunami, 1669 Etna eruption, Garth tsunami, Cadamosto Seamount, Sabancaya, Cerro Blanco (volcano), 1540 heatwave, African humid period and add French, Italian sources from 2019 (PR for Green Sahara? And Ciomadul, Haruj, Lake Cahuilla, Lake Tauca, Salar de Punta Negra and FAs in that same batch), Cueros de Purulla, Cerro Blanco (volcano), Pali-Aike volcanic field, Cumbre Vieja sector collapse/tsunami risk, Negra Muerta volcanic complex, Mount Morning (also update other articles with "Mt. X" rather than "Mount X"), Ojos del Salado, Mount Melbourne ([1]), California River (, Tatara-San Pedro

File:Nuclear power is not healthy poster.jpgEdit

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus. Do you know what's going on with this file? It was discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 18#File:Nuclear power is not healthy poster.jpg and you closed the discussion as "delete". There, however, is nothing in the page's history or the log which shows that the file was ever deleted. I'm asking about this because the file has just been tagged for speedy deletion per F5 which seems odd. Some other odd things are that there's no file displayed on the file's page (only a link to a non-existent file), and there's no indication given of the page being refunded or recreated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Greetings, Marchjuly. I am guessing I simply forgot to press "delete" when I closed that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a look. The page would likely now be eligible for CSD per WP:F2 I guess. Seems unnecessary to wait for F5 unless some is possibly currently requesting a WP:REFUND. it also seems a bit odd that a bot only picked up on the F5 only now, apparently a year after the file most likely became an orphan. Do you think this is some kind of bug? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
I've deleted it under F2. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Southcott (band) DRVEdit

Did you mean to say "incorrect" here, instead of "correct"? -- RoySmith (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, corrected it. My typing skills that morning were rather poor. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Admin's Barnstar
Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus,

I wanted to commend you for your thoughtful, reasoned closing analysis and consensus determination (or lack thereof, in this case) at the Jo-Ann Roberts (2nd nomination) deletion discussion. Your analysis thoughtfully and rationally considered all arguments and, in this way, should be highlighted as a feature decision that AfD is notionally not a vote. For example, despite the number of "keeps" outweighing the "delete" or "redirects," the strength of the arguments put forward by those !voting in the minority shines through in your determination.

Anyway, just wanted to thank you for this closing rationale. It is truly the best AfD closing rationale I've read thus far.

For this, although somewhat non-specific, I award you an Admin Barnstar.

Thanks again,
Doug Mehus T·C 16:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotEdit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
65   Zuras (talk) Add sources
46   2010 United States Senate election in North Carolina (talk) Add sources
40   2018 United States House of Representatives elections in Louisiana (talk) Add sources
22   Resistants (talk) Add sources
30   2012 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina (talk) Add sources
67   Galactic empire (talk) Add sources
41   Sentry (Kree) (talk) Cleanup
1,018   Green Party of Canada (talk) Cleanup
20   Plunderer (comics) (talk) Cleanup
46   Miracle Man (talk) Expand
207   North Carolina's 9th congressional district (talk) Expand
18   McCrae Dowless (talk) Expand
353   2016 United States presidential election in North Carolina (talk) Unencyclopaedic
28   Imperium Galactica (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12   Movements of Fire and Shadow (talk) Unencyclopaedic
702   Deviant (comics) (talk) Merge
200   Middle-earth objects (talk) Merge
35   Fantasticar (talk) Merge
29   Covenant-breaker (talk) Wikify
21   Midnight on the Firing Line (talk) Wikify
42   New Men (Marvel Comics) (talk) Wikify
4   Smitty the Jumper (talk) Orphan
4   Ernesto Gainza Medina (talk) Orphan
3   Tissue residue (talk) Orphan
59   2020 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina (talk) Stub
27   Izzy Cohen (talk) Stub
31   2020 United States House of Representatives elections in South Carolina (talk) Stub
17   Global Peace Agency (talk) Stub
16   Lifter (comics) (talk) Stub
43   Tigra (DC Comics) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 November 4#Lera LoebEdit

At Oakshade (talk · contribs)'s DRV for Lera Loeb at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 November 4#Lera Loeb, you wrote:

I know that sometimes we treat "No consensus" on reviews of speedy deletions as "list at AFD"; the reasons I didn't go for this here are that a) whether to do this has been extensively debated here already and b) a lot of people are hinting that an AFD would likely result as "delete".

Wikipedia:Deletion review#Closing reviews says:

If a speedy deletion is appealed, the closer should treat a lack of consensus as a direction to overturn the deletion, since it indicates that the deletion was not uncontroversial (which is a requirement of almost all criteria for speedy deletion). Any editor may then nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum. But such nomination is in no way required, if no editor sees reason to nominate.

Please reclose the DRV as "speedy deletion overturned owing to a lack of consensus" as required by the DRV closing instructions.

I also do not find the reasons for not listing at AfD to be compelling. DRV is focused on process and AfD is focused on discussing sources. Many editors did not discuss sources at the DRV because they were focused on process. An AfD would give editors the opportunity to focus on discussing the sources. I found this DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Recent discussions and was not a participant in it. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Oi. Seems like I forgot that line; I've restored it. I am not convinced by your argument on the not-listing-at-AFD question, though; the people in the deletion review were discussing sources to a substantial degree and there was little indication that they would be considered to be adequate at AFD stage (for example, there was little indication that there was more than one GNG-qualifying source). Besides, the concern about pursuing ultimately useless processes was articulated in the deletion review and long historical experience indicates that they can be indeed harmful. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17Edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andagua volcanic field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Crust
Purupuruni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aeolian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-47Edit

20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Jo-Jo Eumerus".