User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 67
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 60 | ← | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 | Archive 68 | Archive 69 | Archive 70 |
Your GA nomination of Corrida de Cori
The article Corrida de Cori you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Corrida de Cori for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- 45 new Wikipedias now have access to the Growth features. [1]
- A majority of Wikipedias now have access to the Growth features. The Growth team has published an FAQ page about the features. This translatable FAQ covers the description of the features, how to use them, how to change the configuration, and more.
Problems
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on 14 September. This is planned at 14:00 UTC. [2]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 September. It will be on all wikis from 16 September (calendar).
- Starting this week, Wikipedia in Italian will receive weekly software updates on Wednesdays. It used to receive the updates on Thursdays. Due to this change, bugs will be noticed and fixed sooner. [3]
- You can add language links in the sidebar in the new Vector skin again. You do this by connecting the page to a Wikidata item. The new Vector skin has moved the language links but the new language selector cannot add language links yet. [4]
- The syntax highlight tool marks up code with different colours. It now can highlight 23 new code languages. Additionally,
golang
can now be used as an alias for the Go programming language, and a specialoutput
mode has been added to show a program's output. [5][6]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ahvaz on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Cumbre Vieja tsunami hazard
Seems like the last five days have seen a steep increase in readership numbers on that article. Wonder what's been driving it and if the article as-is is providing good service to readers... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks again for the DYK review! I was actually just reading that article, and looking at who wrote it, to find it was you. The reason is that there is currently potential volcanic activity in the area - currently only an increase in earthquakes (up to 3.3 or so), and about a 10cm rising of the land in the area, no magma reaching the surface. For an example news report, see [7] or [8]. I've been watching this because I live on the next island over (Tenerife), and I'm probably going to be visiting La Palma in a few weeks time...
- With the article, I think it over-describes the dramatic part of the analysis, and doesn't present the counter-views clearly enough, particularly in the lead. That's true both for the main article, and Cumbre Vieja (which has too much weight on the tsunami risk - most of that should be moved into the specific article). I think it's particularly important if the volcanic activity develops further, as then there would be a *lot* more attention on the article, as there would be a lot more media attention (there's already been some...). I'll try to help a bit with this soon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel:I would probably not move anything from Cumbre Vieja to Cumbre Vieja tsunami hazard, myself - it seems like it's mostly the same information as already in our article but more poorly written. I've taken an initial stab at emphasizing the critique in the lead section but I wonder if a better structure would help in the rest of the article at achieving the same goal - I am not sure the current format is the ideal one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Expect a lot more attention on this over the next few days - it erupted this afternoon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for noting this. Say, Mike Peel, is there something like an official volcano observatory that deals with Cumbre Vieja? I can't find it on a quick search. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- INVOLCAN. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for noting this. Say, Mike Peel, is there something like an official volcano observatory that deals with Cumbre Vieja? I can't find it on a quick search. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Expect a lot more attention on this over the next few days - it erupted this afternoon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel:I would probably not move anything from Cumbre Vieja to Cumbre Vieja tsunami hazard, myself - it seems like it's mostly the same information as already in our article but more poorly written. I've taken an initial stab at emphasizing the critique in the lead section but I wonder if a better structure would help in the rest of the article at achieving the same goal - I am not sure the current format is the ideal one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
Great works and contributions Rahul SomanDiscussions - contribs 20:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
- @Rahulsoman:Um, thanks, but I am pretty sure I have never designed any graphics here... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: I wanted to give a barnstar, I never noticed which class it is. :) leave it. Rahul SomanDiscussions - contribs 21:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
(For talk page readers) Featured article candidacy input request
El Tatio has been nominated as a Featured article candidate here to see if it satisfies these criteria; feel free to comment as the nomination will be archived if it gets no input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Growth features are now deployed to almost all Wikipedias. For the majority of small Wikipedias, the features are only available for experienced users, to test the features and configure them. Features will be available for newcomers starting on 20 September 2021.
- MediaWiki had a feature that would highlight local links to short articles in a different style. Each user could pick the size at which "stubs" would be highlighted. This feature was very bad for performance, and following a consultation, has been removed. [9]
- A technical change was made to the MonoBook skin to allow for easier maintenance and upkeep. This has resulted in some minor changes to HTML that make MonoBook's HTML consistent with other skins. Efforts have been made to minimize the impact on editors, but please ping Jon (WMF) on wiki or in phabricator if any problems are reported.
Problems
- There was a problem with search last week. Many search requests did not work for 2 hours because of an accidental restart of the search servers. [10]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 September. It will be on all wikis from 23 September (calendar).
- The meta=proofreadpage API has changed. The
piprop
parameter has been renamed toprpiprop
. API users should update their code to avoid unrecognized parameter warnings. Pywikibot users should upgrade to 6.6.0. [11]
Future changes
- The Reply tool will be deployed to the remaining wikis in the coming weeks. It is currently part of "Discussion tools" in Beta features at most wikis. You will be able to turn it off in Editing Preferences. [12]
- The previously announced change to how you obtain tokens from the API has been delayed to September 21 because of an incompatibility with Pywikibot. Bot operators using Pywikibot can follow T291202 for progress on a fix, and should plan to upgrade to 6.6.1 when it is released.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yonaguni Knoll IV
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yonaguni Knoll IV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yonaguni Knoll IV
The article Yonaguni Knoll IV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yonaguni Knoll IV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 16:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
In appreciation
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the large number of thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- iOS 15 has a new function called Private Relay (Apple website). This can hide the user's IP when they use Safari browser. This is like using a VPN in that we see another IP address instead. It is opt-in and only for those who pay extra for iCloud. It will come to Safari users on OSX later. There is a technical discussion about what this means for the Wikimedia wikis.
Problems
- Some gadgets and user-scripts add items to the portlets (article tools) part of the skin. A recent change to the HTML may have made those links a different font-size. This can be fixed by adding the CSS class
.vector-menu-dropdown-noicon
. [13]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 September. It will be on all wikis from 30 September (calendar).
- The GettingStarted extension was built in 2013, and provides an onboarding process for new account holders in a few versions of Wikipedia. However, the recently developed Growth features provide a better onboarding experience. Since the vast majority of Wikipedias now have access to the Growth features, GettingStarted will be deactivated starting on 4 October. [14]
- A small number of users will not be able to connect to the Wikimedia wikis after 30 September. This is because an old root certificate will no longer work. They will also have problems with many other websites. Users who have updated their software in the last five years are unlikely to have problems. Users in Europe, Africa and Asia are less likely to have immediate problems even if their software is too old. You can read more.
- You can receive notifications when someone leaves a comment on user talk page or mentions you in a talk page comment. Clicking the notification link will now bring you to the comment and highlight it. Previously, doing so brought you to the top of the section that contained the comment. You can find more information in T282029.
Future changes
- The Reply tool will be deployed to the remaining wikis in the coming weeks. It is currently part of "Discussion tools" in Beta features at most wikis. You will be able to turn it off in Editing Preferences. See the list of wikis. [15]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lake San Agustín
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lake San Agustín you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Sustainable energy
Hiya. I don't know whether you're interested in renewables more generally, but if you are, can I tempt you to review sustainable energy at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sustainable energy/archive1? FemkeMilene (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Note to self...
Hat-tip goes to Iridescent at WP:ANI In terms of byte-size, African humid period clocks in at a mere 0.45MB, between HiLo48's and Drmies's talk pages and actually less than Wikipedia's 0.61MB. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm wearily familiar with delivering that particular explanation, following the wars over User talk:EEng. The amount of text on a page is virtually irrelevant when it comes to server/browser load; even the most antiquated laptop can download and format an entire novel without any difficulty. What causes problems is fancy templates that invoke a ton of markup, and images (particularly gif files as Mediawiki doesn't automatically resize them but instead sends the full-size image to your browser and tells your cmputer to reformat it locally). Running pages through whatdoesmysitecost is often an eye-opening experience—because most Wikipedia editors are working on fixed, unlimited connections, it's easy to forget that graphic-and-formatting-heavy pages like Israel can be a significant expense to readers. (This is going to become an increasing issue for en-wiki, as Brexit has meant the return of roaming data charges for UK-based readers accessing Wikipedia from the EU/EEA.) ‑ Iridescent 08:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- What I found eye-opening - and in light of my firm opposition to splitting African humid period, good - is that AHP despite being slightly longer than Wikipedia and having twice as many references in raw prose size consumes less bandwidth. Wonder why that is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you drill down into the details page on the 'full results' tab, (African Humid Period, Wikipedia; the link from the main results page isnt obvious and is buried under "Want to make things better?") you can see what's actually causing the server and processor load. Unsurprisingly, it's the number of images that makes Wikipedia such a drain. ‑ Iridescent 12:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- What I found eye-opening - and in light of my firm opposition to splitting African humid period, good - is that AHP despite being slightly longer than Wikipedia and having twice as many references in raw prose size consumes less bandwidth. Wonder why that is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- A more efficient way of sending changes from Wikidata to Wikimedia wikis that show them has been enabled for the following 10 wikis: mediawiki.org, the Italian, Catalan, Hebrew and Vietnamese Wikipedias, French Wikisource, and English Wikivoygage, Wikibooks, Wiktionary and Wikinews. If you notice anything strange about how changes from Wikidata appear in recent changes or your watchlist on those wikis you can let the developers know.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 October. It will be on all wikis from 7 October (calendar).
- Some gadgets and bots that use the API to read the AbuseFilter log might break. The
hidden
property will no longer say an entry isimplicit
for unsuppressed log entries about suppressed edits. If your bot needs to know this, do a separate revision query. Additionally, the property will have the valuefalse
for visible entries; previously, it wasn't included in the response. [16] - A more efficient way of sending changes from Wikidata to Wikimedia wikis that show them will be enabled for all production wikis. If you notice anything strange about how changes from Wikidata appear in recent changes or your watchlist you can let the developers know.
Future changes
- You can soon get cross-wiki notifications in the iOS Wikipedia app. You can also get notifications as push notifications. More notification updates will follow in later versions. [17]
- The JavaScript variables
wgExtraSignatureNamespaces
,wgLegalTitleChars
, andwgIllegalFileChars
will soon be removed frommw.config
. These are not part of the "stable" variables available for use in wiki JavaScript. [18] - The JavaScript variables
wgCookiePrefix
,wgCookieDomain
,wgCookiePath
, andwgCookieExpiration
will soon be removed from mw.config. Scripts should instead usemw.cookie
from the "mediawiki.cookie" module. [19]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Yonaguni Knoll IV
On 1 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yonaguni Knoll IV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a "lake" of liquid CO
2 exists underground at Yonaguni Knoll IV? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yonaguni Knoll IV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yonaguni Knoll IV), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Your hook got 20,505 views (854 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2021—keep up the great work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Salar Ignorado
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salar Ignorado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Smallchief -- Smallchief (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism
On 9 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that monsoons in Asia may contribute to the dry climate of the Mediterranean during summer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rodwell-Hoskins mechanism. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Salar Ignorado
The article Salar Ignorado you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salar Ignorado for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Smallchief -- Smallchief (talk) 09:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Promotion of El Tatio
RfA 2021 review update
Thanks so much for participating in Phase 1 of the RfA 2021 review. 8 out of the 21 issues discussed were found to have consensus. Thanks to our closers of Phase 1, Primefac and Wugapodes.
The following had consensus support of participating editors:
- Corrosive RfA atmosphere
- The atmosphere at RfA is deeply unpleasant. This makes it so fewer candidates wish to run and also means that some members of our community don't comment/vote.
- Level of scrutiny
- Many editors believe it would be unpleasant to have so much attention focused on them. This includes being indirectly a part of watchlists and editors going through your edit history with the chance that some event, possibly a relatively trivial event, becomes the focus of editor discussion for up to a week.
- Standards needed to pass keep rising
- It used to be far easier to pass RfA however the standards necessary to pass have continued to rise such that only "perfect" candidates will pass now.
- Too few candidates
- There are too few candidates. This not only limits the number of new admin we get but also makes it harder to identify other RfA issues because we have such a small sample size.
- "No need for the tools" is a poor reason as we can find work for new admins
The following issues had a rough consensus of support from editors:
- Lifetime tenure (high stakes atmosphere)
Because RfA carries with it lifetime tenure, granting any given editor sysop feels incredibly important. This creates a risk adverse and high stakes atmosphere. - Admin permissions and unbundling
There is a large gap between the permissions an editor can obtain and the admin toolset. This brings increased scrutiny for RFA candidates, as editors evaluate their feasibility in lots of areas. - RfA should not be the only road to adminship
Right now, RfA is the only way we can get new admins, but it doesn't have to be.
Please consider joining the brainstorming which will last for the next 1-2 weeks. This will be followed by Phase 2, a 30 day discussion to consider solutions to the problems identified in Phase 1.
There are 2 future mailings planned. One when Phase 2 opens and one with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Best, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 October. It will be on all wikis from 14 October (calendar).
- The "auto-number headings" preference is being removed. You can read phab:T284921 for the reasons and discussion. This change was previously announced. A JavaScript snippet is available which can be used to create a Gadget on wikis that still want to support auto-numbering.
Meetings
- You can join a meeting about the Desktop Improvements. A demonstration version of the newest feature will be shown. The event will take place on Tuesday, 12 October at 16:00 UTC. See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Gabbro question
Jo-Jo, I'm hoping you can answer a geology question for me. I just stubbed British Neolithic pottery, including a comment about one group of pots coming from an area of gabbroic clay in Cornwall. Looking at our article on gabbro I can make no sense of this -- gabbro is a hard rock. Does gabbroic in this sort of context mean that there are tiny fragments of rock in clay that can be identified as gabbro? That would mean that the pots can be section and the rock identified under a microscope, so I could see that making sense. The pots all come from a particular area, so presumably the gabbro involved has to be unique in some way so other sources of the clay can be discounted. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Close location
Hi Jo-Jo! I recently came across your close here. Writing just A closure statement will be posted on the talk page
makes it very difficult to find the actual closure statement and separates it from the discussion it is actually closing. Could you please at least add a link to the statement? (This is coming up because there's a new related discussion, and I can't tell whether it's valid or just churning up a settled debate without reading the past discussion.) Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis
On 12 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the fixed anvil temperature hypothesis proposes that anvil clouds do not remove excess radiation as the Earth's surface temperature increases? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Lake San Agustín
The article Lake San Agustín you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lake San Agustín for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deletion review for Round World version of the Silmarillion
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Round World version of the Silmarillion. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. SpinningSpark 09:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Uturuncu scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 24 November 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to comment on the draft blurb at TFA. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild:Er, where is the draft blurb? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) it's at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 24, 2021. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, it seems good to me. Note that I do the yearly update of all my articles including Uturuncu during/after the Christmas holidays, so it may be slightly out of date in November. I don't think there is any date that has specific importance for Uturuncu so I have no opinion on the exact day. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) it's at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 24, 2021. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Toolhub is a catalogue to make it easier to find software tools that can be used for working on the Wikimedia projects. You can read more.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 October. It will be on all wikis from 21 October (calendar).
Future changes
- The developers of the Wikipedia Android app are working on communication in the app. You can now answer questions in survey to help the development.
- 3–5% of editors may be blocked in the next few months. This is because of a new service in Safari, which is similar to a proxy or a VPN. It is called iCloud Private Relay. There is a discussion about this on Meta. The goal is to learn what iCloud Private Relay could mean for the communities.
- Wikimedia Enterprise is a new API for those who use a lot of information from the Wikimedia projects on other sites. It is a way to get big commercial users to pay for the data. There will soon be a copy of the Wikimedia Enterprise dataset. You can read more. You can also ask the team questions on Zoom on 22 October 15:00 UTC.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Tommaso Besozzi image
So, after more than 11 years since I uploaded this image File:Tommaso Besozzi.jpg, you have decided to delete it. I don't know why you decided to do so and I am not even going to bother to challenge it, because I am going to lose that battle anyway, given that you have already decided that this non-free image is a terrible crime. You probably have followed all the bureaucratically right procedures and whatever I say will be dismissed. Fine, you won ...
The question is do the people who consider Wikipedia a reliable source of knowledge also win? I don't think so, because, and in particular with his image, an image gives readers something extra, and in this particular image that does reflect something of the despair that in the end led to the Mr Besozzi to commit suicide, they gain something extra. That said, you probably did not even bother to read the article ...
So, go ahead, just delete the image and pretend to feel you have contributed to Wikipedia. Frankly, I happen to disagree. You could also have decided to just ignore the obvious copy-right violations, and look the other way. In the past 11 years did anyone ever had a problem with this image, did anyone ever legally challenged it? I doubt that, but, please, prove me wrong. So, delete the image, no one is going to be upset if you do, and you have won your easy victory. Congratulations. And you can simply delete this message on your talk page, anyway ... User:DonCalo
- @DonCalo:Uh, what? I didn't delete it, I proposed it for deletion. Not the same thing. And the reason the image is up for deletion is because we already have commons:File:Tommaso Besozzi.jpg which will automagically appear if the local version under the same name is deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, my apologies, I did not understand that the same image was available at Wikicommons, so indeed it makes sense to delete it from Wikpedia. Once again, sorry for the misunderstanding. DonCalo (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ojos del Salado, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bivouac and Abrasion.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's done, bot. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Fumarole mineral
An article that you have been involved in editing—Fumarole mineral—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Coolest Tool Award 2021 is looking for nominations. You can recommend tools until 27 October.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 October. It will be on all wikis from 28 October (calendar).
Future changes
- Diff pages will have an improved copy and pasting experience. The changes will allow the text in the diff for before and after to be treated as separate columns and will remove any unwanted syntax. [20]
- The version of the Liberation fonts used in SVG files will be upgraded. Only new thumbnails will be affected. Liberation Sans Narrow will not change. [21]
Meetings
- You can join a meeting about the Community Wishlist Survey. News about the disambiguation and the real-time preview wishes will be shown. The event will take place on Wednesday, 27 October at 14:30 UTC. See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)