User talk:RHaworth/Archive to 2010 May

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

The Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon

Hello Richard, As per your stipulation, "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. However please explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page." I have complied with your request - the discussion page has had 8 different people comment on why they object to the file being deleted. This much I can guarantee - the article wil Continue to be improved and updated as the sources continue to come in. Thank you for bringing it to our attention; Regards, John Johnny 02:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MWAWWIKI (talk • contribs)

The latin phonetic method of Shanghainese

[Title width guide.]

MKD

Hey Beard, I saw your expertise are restricted to small English towns, so don't pose as an expert in a matter you don't know. Have you ever tried to get a Driver's license or join the military in Brazil or other Latin American country? I assume: NO! So... do REAL research. --Officer Boscorelli (talk) 17:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Blackpool images

Hi, I have just noticed the photos you uploaded of residential blocks to the article List of tallest buildings and structures in Blackpool. This is of great help, and in my opinion has vastly improved the article. Great work, thanks again. Stevvvv4444 (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Vemma revisited

On 13 Apr 2008, you left this message re Vemma.

After a "hiatus" from Wikipedia, largely spawning from taking the above personally, I'm back and desire to resume with editing other articles; I no longer have any vested interest in Vemma, nor am I any longer a rep as of July 2009; COI can be stricken as of this point. The whole idea of creating the article was to actually allow others to contribute to said article; given that Wikipedia is, of course, allowed for all to edit and contribute, providing other members with a chance to make said article "compliant". I admit and apologize about my "newbie errors".

However, please note that you stated to have "protected the page" and said MLM is "quite rightly, treated more harsly at AfD because they are immoral." Please note that statement quite possibly implied the presence of using personal POV and/or bias as a basis of determination to protect/remove the page. Wikipedia is designed to present facts for the public at large to decide for themselves whether Vemma is "moral" or not, or for example whether or not Enron is an ethical company, whether Bernard Madoff deserves to be condemned or praised, or if Adolf Hitler is a good or bad person; I can sit here and condemn Hitler all day on his wiki, but 1. It does affect NPOV in general and 2. there are people who might actually like Hitler. Therefore, if there are any restraints that prevent this article from being properly created or edited, I humbly request for you to release them. Thank you. -- Edwardw818 (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

• Please try to be more succinct - references to Hitler, etc. are not needed. I suggest you create a draft article at User:Edwardw818/sandbox at raise the matter at deletion review. I shall e-mail you your text. (If you happen to see my message below, the difference is that Vemma had an AfD discussion but Eddsworld did not.)

Unprotection of Eddsworld article

Roughly two years ago the page on Eddsworld (an animated web series) was deleted and protected from recreation. Since then the series has been involved with the BBC, the World Wide Fund for Nature and shortly Mitchell and Webb (citations are available for each). I believe that this qualifies Eddsworld as a viable candidate for a Wikipedia article and hope you will unblock the page. TheTomSka (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

• So why not link to the article? I have unprotected it and shall e-mail you the text. I note there is a Tom involved with the project - can you assure me that you have no COI? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2010 Victorian storms

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2010 Victorian storms, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Victorian storms. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

John F Fort

Hello, I added a page for John Fort which was rapidly deleted. I raised this page because I noticed that there was a reference on the Tyco International page to him, but that it linked to another John Fort (a long dead politician and was therefore wrong). Fort was a previous CEO and as he is referenced elsewhere I assumed that he was notable. I could just have removed the [[]] in the Tyco article but that didn't seem right. Did I create the new page incorrectly? GarthJones (talk) 13:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

• Always provide a link to any article you are discussing! Creation was incorrect to the extent that you created something far too stubby. Re-create in User:GarthJones/sandbox. Only when the article has a proper assertion of notability, backed up with decent references, should you move it into the (article) namespace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WLC Architects

The page for WLC Architects was deleted and I am not sure why. WLC Architects is the firm that designed the building that LEED is based on and is widely recognized as a Green Building Architectural firm. They are the only firm mentioned by name in the USGBC written code. They also designed the first Public building using Staw Bale construction(http://www.cityoflancasterca.org/Index.aspx?page=92). With the 'Green' movement that is currently happening, I think that they are definately note-worthy for this. Perhaps the article itself was not complete enough, if this was the case I will expand it so it better explains the facts. Please let me know if this will be satisfactory. Thank you Benwiens (talk) 16:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

• To be honest, I did notice a number of external links when I deleted the talk page. Why did you put them there instead of in the article? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I was building the page up and not knowing the correct methodology for creating a page here, I just started adding content. I now know that it should be mostly complete before adding so I created the sandbox page and will build it up there.Benwiens (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Mystery structure

Not an answer, but thought you might want to read my reply here. Could you say more precisely where this is (whoops, I see you provide co-ords!), as I may take a look next time I'm in the area. Carcharoth (talk) 19:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Freda Game

Not sure if this is how/where to respond to your message but would like to thank for the helpful comments which I have taken on board and will incorporate. DavidLM44 —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLM44 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Dietrich Varez

I am about to create an entry for Dietrich Varez. It seems you deleted a previous entry in this name in 2007; from the note that must have been an appropriate action, probably removing a cut-and-paste lift from an online profile. My contribution is entirely new and is based on several published sources. However, my access to these original sources is (mostly) secondary to their reproduction (as facsimiles)on the web site of Mr. Varez. They appear legitimate. I have referenced both the original source and the online reproductions. I should add that I have never had any contact with Mr. Varez, other than owning two of his prints. I trust this new discussion will meet Wikipedia standards for a start-class article, as he is a well-known and influential artist in Hawaii and his work straddles both commercial and fine-art worlds there. Also his bio is not exactly routine. Let me know if I am not on sufficiently solid ground here. Thank you. Alawa (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Article for Rev. Dr. Geoffrey Black

I noted that you had deleted this article. I did not create it, but merely suggested it be created. He is the new GM&P for the United Church of Christ. I thought he was notable enough to be on Wikipedia as the previous General Minister and President was and the denomination has over 1 million members. It looked like Arcangel had moved the article about a month before and rearranged the title. Then in January you looked for the moved article and nothing was there. Granted, I was not satisfied with the article I saw because it seemed to be copied from the UCC website bio. Is there a way to recreate this page within Wikipedia standards? You can send me the text. My e-mail is enabled.claimman75 (talk) 03:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thought you'd enjoy this

Came across this this morning. You must have peed in his cereal recently. Blocked indefinitely of course. Didn't find your connection to him though I'm sure there are other accounts this twit has used. Pretty sure he and indefed user Sawconqueredcame are the same. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

File:KeysPark.jpg

I did not upload that image. I uploaded a different image with the same filename in 2007, the following year someone overwrote it with a completely different image, which is the one now on Commons -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks - I did not look closely enough. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

United States v. Ballin

Hi. I put in the work to bring WP:Article Incubator/United States v. Ballin up to spec. If you could take a look and see whether the article is fit to graduate to articlespace, that would be great! I'm not sure whether you can graduate the article, since you have edited on it in the past (though just a tiny bit). Still, since you moved it into the incubator, it would be good if you took a look. Thanks! —ShinyG 21:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

United States v. Ballin has graduated from the incubator.—ShinyG 00:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Commons for images

I echo a remark above: please, please, please upload images, directly to the Commons. For images from Geograph, use Magnus' tool which copies them directly from Geograph to Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

• I'm sorry but simply I do not understand the Commons or the Magnus tool you have recommended :( For some reason I find the process too confusing. I thought I was progressing by actually managing to upload but obviously am not --J3Mrs (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

So what is the difference between the upload process here and that on the Commons? As for Magnus' tool - what is difficult about copying a Geograph uri from your browser's adress bar into the form on Magnus' page? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

• Because something is not a problem for you, please don't assume it is simple for me. I enjoy doing what I do on Wikipedia, not what anyone else wants me to do. --J3Mrs (talk) 09:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I asked a specific question: what is the difference between the upload process here and that on the Commons? The question implied that you should at least try to upload to the Commons. Please answer my question: what is the difference? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

One very significant difference is the different copyright conditions that apply to images on wikipedia and images on Commons, although that obviously doesn't apply to images from Geograph. I'm afraid that I don't really see the problem here. And having to get a TUSC password to use Magnus' tool is just a PITA. Malleus Fatuorum 18:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Malleus, what problem? Do you mean you don't see why J3Mrs has such objections to using the Commons or you don't see why I am so insistent that free-use images should be on the Commons? Getting a TUSC password is a once-off operation. Given that uploading Geograph images via Magnus' tool is a lot easier than via the regular upload, getting a TUSc password is time well spent. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't see why you're so insistent on uploading to Commons. I had a TUSC password once, but I lost it, and I can't be bothered to get another. Malleus Fatuorum 19:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

The arts and education

You PRODded this as OR/essay, and it was deleted. The author has requested restoration, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have undeleted it, and now notify you in case you wish to take it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Commons talkback

I responded to your post here. ww2censor (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

XpanD 3D

XpanD 3D, which you proposed for deletion, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XpanD 3D. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Vodafy

You comment on this page made me laugh. And it could have been added - on no less than three occasions. NtheP (talk) 12:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Roller coaster

Hello. It is almost a year later now from when you nominated me for a "Speedy deletion" or whatever it is.I was so annoyed, I didint even bother to comment back until now,and that was last october, it is now APRIL. I didint know any better at the time. It was like my first week. Not to be rude, but I would appriciate it next time if someone could tell me what I am saying is not important my first time making a mistake on my FIRST week. -- Androllercoaster (talk) 20:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• What are you talking about? What page did I nominate for deletion? Did you actually read this message? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Robert Fourer

I noticed that you have deleted an article for Robert Fourer. Robert Fourer is a prominent scientist working in the area of operational research and management science. He is recognized as being the designer of the most widely used modeling language for mathematical programming called AMPL. Together with with David M. Gay and Brian Kernighan he was awarded 1993 ORSA/CSTS Prize by the Computer Science Technical Section of the Operations Research Society of America, for writings on the design of mathematical programming systems and the AMPL modeling language. Taking this into account I would like to request restoration of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcmlxxxi (talk • contribs)

• The piece I deleted was simply not a bio. You have provided more of a bio in your message above than in the 46k bytes I deleted. I have e-mailed you the text - do not repost it! However if you actually write a proper bio of the guy with proper references, then it will probably stick. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
• Thanks. I thought the old article was not substantional enough, but it turned out that one can write a book about Fourer based on it :). Now I see why it was deleted.

CoaXPress

Hello. It is some months later now from when you nominated CoaXPress for "deletion". The reason was that it was non-notable. No gnews or ynews hits for this term, and no gscholar or gbooks hits either. And indeed It was difficult to defend as there were no books and no publications on Coaxpress at that time as good industrial research is not published until it comes on the marked (but it is not because there are no articles that it is not important, in contrary, I have several articles on other subjects in high ranked IEEE journals and conferences, which were never implemented in a product). I think that you will now find more on CoaXPress as it is standardized by JIIA(Japan Industrial Imaging Association). Is there some possibility to reopen the discussion, as I think that CoaXPress has several technical advantages that it is valuable information for an Encyclopedia (even if the productions would stop now and the number of applications is limited).Xmaillard (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

• See this advice. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 04:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Gabby77/uploads

Penny Mayes pointed out this user's misattributed Geograph images to me, and I've done a little bit of cleaning up – I've orphaned a couple that were already on Commons so that they can be deleted here, uploaded a couple more to Commons, and identified a bunch more source images on Geograph that I don't quite have the enthusiasm to move to Commons now. --bjh21 (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

• I want to leave a few in place to show to Barry Hunter of Geograph. But I will deal with all of the Geograph rip-offs in due course. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 04:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Aunsby

An article that you have been involved in editing, Aunsby , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Brunnian (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Falmer - Requested move

I have started a requested move for these articles here. As someone that has been involved in the previous moves and/or discussions about them you may wish to comment there. Dpmuk (talk) 09:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Sironta

Hi, I have uploaded in User:Marj9543/Sironta the new article that I have wrote about Sironta. Can you tell me if it is right now? If not, can you say me what do you miss in the article? Thank you. Marj9543(talk) 09:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• See the DRV discussion. Wait until someone with no COI thinks the product is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I think that the article is now correct. I have added referrences mentioning Sironta as an European Comission Project, to add notability. I have added new links, new PDFs, new text, new wikipedia links, etc. As C.Fred (talk) told me, I ask you (the deleting administrator) if it is sufficiently improved that it can go back into the main encyclopedia. Thanks again. Marj9543(talk) 10:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

• I think you are essentially advertising and am certainly not going to move the article anywhere. The DRV discussion is still running. i will accept the decision of the admin who closes the DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Request to restore and userfy old article

Since you were the deleting admin, not that it matters, can I ask you to restore Unofficial Elder Scrolls Pages somewhere in my user space, please? I'm a Patroller at UESP and came across some old references to it on our site. I'd like to at least be able to view what the page was before it was deleted; the entire edit history might be interesting to see too. I don't know if there's a policy against keeping that type of page userfied here, but if there is, let me know and I'll move the information to my account on UESP. Thanks! —RobinHood70 ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

• Entire history userfied to User:RobinHood70/UESP. I am happy for it to stay there. Talk copied to User talk:RobinHood70/UESP. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Great, thanks! —RobinHood70 ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

About miRoamer article

Hi, I wrote a article 'miRoamer', and I notice that you've deleted one with the reason: "No meaningful, substantive content: we gave it several hours to be expanded." Could you please go to User:superldm/Miroamer and check if it's okay to put it in the main space? Thank you very much! :) Superldm (talk) 02:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Tobacco Marketing and African Americans

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Tobacco Marketing and African Americans has been removed. It was removed by Closedmouth with the following edit summary '(prod is contested, please take it to afd instead if you wish to have it deleted (per WP:PROD))'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Closedmouth before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Haiku Bootstrap Architecture deletion

I believe that the deletion of the Haiku Bootstrap Architecture article under G12 was uncalled-for. The authour responsible was also the same person who initially wrote the article, as can be traced via the following posts from a conversation regarding the topic: here (the original post containing the original article), here, and here. Thank you. Dustin Howett (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

• Copyvio was just an easy way of getting rid of something that was violating our free host rule. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Fair enough, understood. Thanks for the explanation. Dustin Howett (talk) 21:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Cloud Communications Alliance deletion

After further reviewing the notability guidelines, the proposed article Cloud Communications Alliance (which was deleted at your direction) has been improved (I hope) with third-party references, and it should be closer to suitability for Wikipedia. If you don't mind looking at the new version, it is sitting here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tsger/Cloud_Communications_Alliance.

The intent is to create an article that meets appropriate criteria and is as neutral as possible, relying on third-party materials to outline the basics. If you still feel it does not pass muster, your feedback would be appreciated. Thank you ... and I apologize for any clumsiness on my part as I pursue this process.Tsger (talk) 21:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Pardon My French

Would you mind explaining what the fuck this is? Nowhere does any policy page state that the tagging user has to be the one to remove all file links. I find your inherent inability to assume good faith, lack of common courtesy, and utter laziness absolutely revolting. You should be ashamed to call yourself an administrator; step down immediately please. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

• Is it correct to apply a speedy tag to a "now Commons" image before that image has been properly orphaned? (Laziness? How many images have you orphaned over the past month? How many images have I orphaned over the past month?) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Samuel Purdey (Group)

Hello again. I posted a question to you last July but I have had no response from you whatsoever. I think you missed it due to a vacation or something. Could you please advise? All the best. Rolluprob (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry re 2009 July, I usually do try to answer all messages here. I try to avoid discussions re bands because I cannot judge notability well. But even I can see that your draft is still short on references to reliable sources. At least a decent time has now passed since the AfD discussion so once you have found better references, take it to deletion review. I shall abstain from comment at the DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:44, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

United States v. De Haro

I contested the PROD - Supreme Court cases are inherently notable. The article does need editing attention, and I have tagged it. If I can, I will rework the article to meet WP:SCOTUS standards. Thanks, GregJackP (talk)

Client Services Collections deletion

Client_Services_Collections has been deleted twice now. The second time I had completely reworked the article to sound non-promotional and only state the facts. If there is something I am doing wrong, please tell me so I can fix it - I've followed the instructions by asking why it was nominated for speedy deletion on it's talk page but I never got an answer on there either... Hope you can help. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apterainc (talk • contribs) 13:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Per WP:CORP, this subject does not seem to meet the inclusion criteria. –xeno^talk 13:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

You do not appear to have read my message on your user_talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Varhaug Idrettslag

Hi, could you undo changes for Varhaug Idrettslag? Or at least give a reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olaversterk (talk • contribs) 22:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

• You can see the deletion log. Each deletion is accompanied by a reason. You could take it to deletion review but you are unlikely to have much joy - a purely local sports club is unlikely to be deemed notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree that a purely local sports club would not be of interest. However Varhaug Idrettslag has some achievements which would be noteworthy. Olaversterk (talk) 22:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
• So go to deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
  • I have done that now. I don't understand why you wouldn't discuss it. Olaversterk (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
• What was there to discuss? I had decided the club was non-notable. You have provided no evidence to the contrary. End of story. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

The consensus at DRV was that the article did not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. The article is now listed at AFD. Rettetast (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Input/Output Control System (IBM)

I was going to add some references to Deletion of Input/Output Control System (IBM) and I saw at Input/Output Control System (IBM) that you had deleted it. Was that simply because it was missing references, or were there more substantive issues?

Is anybody working on a replacement? If so, I'd like to provide them with references for 7070 IOCS and 7090 IOCS. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

• It was not an article - as simple as that! I have e-mailed you the gobble-de-gook that was there. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I had thought that your e-mail was a comment on the deleted article rather than the article itself. It has notihing to do with IOCS but is input to IOCP; I've started an IOCP page in my sandbox User:Chatul/I/O configuration program (IOCP) and want to be sure that I understand Wike conventions and customs before doing anything more permanent. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (talk) 16:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cloud Communications Alliance deletion

Would you be able to reply to the query at Cloud Communications Alliance above? If I am missing your reply, will you kindly point me toward its location? Thank you. Tsger (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

• Launch it and see what others think. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:21, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Digito-Rename

It is unclear why you deleted Digito-Rename resize and convert and upload images. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikki agarwal (talk • contribs) 03:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

• Unclear!! Have you looked at the deletion log. Three admins are of the same opinion - can you read what thatopinion is? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Look i have been talking all admins they havent ben abe to justify just go to talk page of each and check it out.

According to you if it avdersating tell me which line you feel like that. -- Rikki agarwal (talk) 05:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

• I did have a brief look at your website. Quite honestly, I don't see the use of the product. I can do bulk renames in a more flxible manner than you offer using ZTree. I re-size with Paint Shop Pro or for dynamic thumb generation, I have phpThumb.php. But see my my standard advice to spammers. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Download the software and use it and you will understand the easyness of it .I am not telling it is the best software but it can be useful here are some of the links where it has featured

http://www.mydigitallife.info/2010/04/20/download-digito-to-resize-rename-and-convert-pictures-images-in-bulk/ http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/rename-resize-convert-upload-images-with-digito/ http://www.celebwebnews.com/tech/download-digito-bulk-image-converter-utility.html http://www.be-mine.info/software/digito-to-resize-rename-and-convert-pictures-fre-download http://www.dtechgadget.com/download-digito-to-resize-rename-and-convert-pictures-images-in-bulk/ http://www.softpedia.com/progScreenshots/Digito-Screenshot-156660.html http://topic.feeds4all.nl/Download-Digito-To-Resize-Rename-and/1720332335.aspx

and there are many more just do a google on it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikki agarwal (talk • contribs) 07:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Stourhed (nl.wikipedia)

Please see this - Erik Baas (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

List of civil parishes in Somerset

Hi, Your recent edit to List of civil parishes in Somerset changing an image name to JPG seems to have also removed the FL star, stopped the reflist from working and removed other templates from List of civil parishes in Somerset. Was this intentional?— Rod ^talk 07:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

• My apologies - I did not investigate enough. But I have a very good excuse: I never saw the three templates in an expanded state because this page is simply too <expletive deleted> big. It takes ages to edit and more than once saving my edit crashed. I now see that it is in category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. There is an obvious natural split into the five rural districts. I suggests you do that split immediately. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks - each of the lists appears in the 7 different districts eg Taunton Deane, South Somerset etc, but this list was put together as those that do this for other counties argued each county needed a list. There were no problems with "template include size is exceeded" when it passed FL in January this year.— Rod ^talk 15:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

HICX Solutions - Deleted?

This page has been unnecessarily deleted. It is valid content of a valid company registered at companies house, company number: 05282784 [Companies House Reference for HICX Solutions Ltd.]

I would request that it be added back. The content will be further enhanced with time and shouldn't be deleted just because it's not yet rich enough. There are various pages of companies on wikipedia, also small one's (e.g. Trace One), many other's could be listed, and there is no reason why this one should not be listed. I would request that you add it back as it's valid information.

Best regards, costasx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Costasx (talk • contribs) 11:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

• It is registered at Companies House. So what? Does registration make a company notable? Try following this advice. (Someone must be stalking you or me - within minutes of your message above Trace One got prodded! And I agree with the prod.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Stephen J. Press

Hi RHaworth. I noticed you restored the Stephen J. Press article in January, but, in light of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Stephen J. Press, I wasn't sure why. Was there a WP:DRV of the article somewhere? Jayjg ^(talk) 01:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

The actual restoration of the article was: "2009-12-29 00:36:32 Platinumphotographer (8,691 bytes) (moved User:Drsjpdc/Stephen J. Press2 to Stephen J. Press: this man is well known, and has made major contributions to our profession. Also, he seems to be writing everyone else's bios)". My restore of 2010-01-27 02:12:33 was just the 12 edits dated 2009-09-23 and restored "underneath" the existing article for the purpose of sock puppet checking of ModTheRod (talk · contribs · logs). See this and this. I did not notice that the article had been subject to AfD.

As I said, "I just do not want to get involved". Go ahead and delete or re-AfD as you wish. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Hologram therapy

Did you get a chance to read the talk page? I am detracting; not advertising. I am trying to stop the ignorance before it gets out of hand, although it is probably too late, and I find the idea of hologram therapy insulting to my intelligence, such as it is. People have a right to know what it is (a placebo) and what it is not (medicine). Heyzeuss (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

• I have restored the article to User:Heyzeuss/hologram. We need phrases such as "practitioners claim" and "pseudoscience" in the first paragraph. Omit the list of athletes - counts as attack. But above all, provide references to reliable sources that say it is snake oil. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Ready to re-deploy, maybe. I used less friendly language, like pseudoscience. I also gave a reference for each athlete, as you suggested, although if it is too much of a ham-fisted attack, the names can go. Heyzeuss (talk) 14:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

• If anything you have swung too far the other way and made the article too critical. The image of Shaq O'Neal smacked of cheap journalism - we must have an image even if it is not very relevant. Now, if you had an image of an athlete identifiably wearing an hologram, that would be different. Or a picture of an actual product. Try and find a couple more reliable sources which are critical. Then move the article back to hologram therapy. If it gets threatened with deletion, I will defend it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

economics book - Deleted?

Why was my economics book deleted? I was the only author. I didnt request it to be deleted. Shabidoo (talk • contribs) 13:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

• None of your edits have been deleted. What are you talking about? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

tabnapping article

hi thanks for your notification. i have added the needed references for that name. so kindly notify me if still changes has to be done. --goutham tamilselvan 13:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imgoutham (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your explanation. I just made a mistake and wanted to create the page at the ca.wikipedia.org and not at en.wikipedia.org

I will apreciate that you erase the english page because I'm not going to use it.

Sorry for my mistake and thanks again.

maria --Mzamora2 (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Keith Vaz

Just to say thanks for a very speedy response yesterday. JRPG (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Gongoozle

Hello, I recreated this page: Gongoozle. It isn't a wikipedia page, more like a soft redirect to wiktionary, but just FYI, kind regards, Captain n00dle\^Talk 09:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Pathotic

You stupid Roger W Haworth. Wikipedia is my website. I created it. I have your weird photo with lots of dandruff on my portfolio. You are a molto weirdo so let me put my non-fiction stuff on wikipedia. PathossKid (talk) 23:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not any one person's website. The only stuff you have posted is clearly fiction and should be published on one of your own websites. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy of Sole Sisters

I noticed your db tag on the above. Could you take a look at the parent company, Media Projects and see what should be done with it. Thanks! --Stormbay (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

requirements for RfA

What is the requirements for adminship candidature? Only to have 2000+ edits? √Aleksa Lukic (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

• Have you read the guide to requests for adminship carefully? Re edit counts, look at the graph. You seem to edit articles on diverse subjects which stands strongly in your favour. But I suggest you wait another three months before you apply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Bring Flashforward Back- Deleted??

I created a page on Wikipedia called Bring Flashforward Back.

A day later it was deleted under "Speedy Deletion".

The page was fairly short as the fan campaign has only been around for a little over a month so efforts towards the show are limited as are information about the campaign.

The page was made to educate people on the fan campaign for the show Flashforward currently running called "Bring Flashforward Back" and the efforts being made to bring the show back for a second season.

Under section A3 it states that the reason for deletion is that the article only provides external links and no content for the reader.

The whole page is content educating the reader on the fan campaign.

There is no reason that the page should have been deleted.

Kris

--Krisp8888 (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI - sockpuppetry

Sockpuppetry on an article you have touched - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Encorehockey. --Biker Biker (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Heez On Fire

Hey. You're comment is absolutely correct but could have had a little less bite. Just a suggestion; please don't be offended. Take it or leave it. OlYeller^Talktome 13:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

• Be specific: which message? But in any case why should one be gentle with blatant self-promoters and spammers? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Tommy Prozach

Can you tell me the user who created the Tommy Prozach page. Id like to check his other contributions. Thanks Bonewah (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

• Was checking them myself when this message arrived. JETHRO (talk · contribs · logs). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Looks like we got that cleared up. Thanks! Bonewah (talk) 18:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Johnny Duhan

has been recreated as a request to have the deleted contect emailed (userfy?) to the creator. Exxolon (talk) 20:39, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Endarkenment

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Enlightenment for Beginners by Matthew Blythe. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Like I said I'm new here thanks for your help and understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattblythe (talk • contribs)

• Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)