User talk:Carabinieri/Archive12

Please don't edit this page. This is an archive. To leave me a message click here

DYK review

A while ago you reviewed a DYK of mine on revolutionary movement, that after some discussion was falling under a radar. I now have another DYK that seems to have slipped from the front lines, could you perhaps look at it? It's the Template:Did you know nominations/International Sociological Association. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Code (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Code (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Code (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Carabinieri, new to this but noticed your post from 2007 seeking more information on Battle of Tarnawka in early-mid September 1914. Have you identified more detail re this. Some references in a 2010 diary - "War Diary of My Prussian Grandfather" Kurt Asimis, ISBN 13: 9780981329406. I am trying to track history of my German grandfather who is likely to have been captured by the Russians around this time and location. Beuthner (talk) 10:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Beuthner

DYK prep set assembly

Carabinieri, I noticed that you shifted about the prep sets overnight, while constructing your own. I wanted to let you know why I was undoing some of your shifts.

First, I try to tailor sets so that all if not most of the hooks will be seen during the day of the local country. So I try to avoid U.S. hooks in a set, like prep 2, which will eventually run during the U.S. overnight hours. At most, I'd use one; in this case, I had zero, and now there are two.

Second, I try to list the more impressive articles earlier, unless they happen to be ideal for the quirky slot. So the unimpressive "cultural homogenization" hook, which was inserted into a second slot, will be moving much later in the set.

Third, I'm pretty strict about not running two bios in a row. I'm puzzled as to why you have rearranged things so that you have two writer bios in a row in prep 3, but one of them will be moving back to prep 2.

I will try to make sure the arts and sports hooks are properly spread out when I'm done. I'm happy to discuss this further. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

There was a discussion about whether or not to try to run hooks during the day hours of the country they deal with back in 2007 (Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_18#Priority_articles_take_2) and it was pretty much rejected. In any case, the current guideline is also to try and spread hooks about the same country around, particularly articles about the U.S., which there tend to be a lot of. I generally try to move the unimpressive hooks to the middle of the set (generally I feel that we shouldn't use them at all), but I thought the one about cultural homogenization was better than most. I don't see why two bios shouldn't be next to each other since that is a fairly weak similarity as opposed to them being about the same country or both being about sports or art, etc. For example, since you swapped the hooks, PREP2 now contains two hooks about music, while PREP3 doesn't have any.--Carabinieri (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I didn't move any music hooks—centerless grinding and Noureddine Aba were swapped with cultural homogenization and Jami Floyd—and I'm not sure I'd count Mai as one, since it's a film and only tangentially about music (the star of the film had previously been a singer rather than an actress). Two bios in a row is specifically listed as to be avoided in WP:DYKSG#J4: "Try to avoid having two hooks of the same general type next to one another in the update (for example, two US hooks or two bio hooks together)." Since bios (or US hooks) should never be more than half of the total, it's not hard to keep them separated, especially with seven hooks and a maximum of three bios as now.

With all things being equal, I do like to try not to bury a hook when it won't be seen. The proportion of US hooks isn't so high at the moment that we need to run several during US nighttime, though I suspect I've gone further than I need in the other direction. (A lot has changed in DYK since 2007, as best I can determine.) As for the unimpressive articles, we don't have a mechanism for not using ones that have been passed. My philosophy for them is to slot them lower rather than higher, and certainly not in the second spot, which (with the third) I try to keep for those really good articles that don't have an image along with them. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

For some reason I had Noureddine Aba pegged as music-related in my mind. Oops. I still agree with the overall sentiment voiced in 2007, that people aren't generally more interested in reading about their own country than about others. And if they are, Wikipedia's objective should be to enlighten them about what's happening beyond those borders.--Carabinieri (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

It's inevitable that people are going to see hooks about other countries: US gets a maximum of half of a set, which means at least half is from the rest of the world, and other countries get one or maybe two in a single set. I'm looking at it the other way: that people who would most likely be interested in a hook are unlikely to get a chance to see it if it runs when they're asleep. Why should the only New Zealand hook in a week's time run during the country's overnight hours? Why not try to do it during some part of their daytime? BlueMoonset (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

(watching) Last week I had three DYK while I was asleep, one causing headaches, - that is another reason to avoid running a hook on a country when that country sleeps, on top of living people liking to see (and have others see) hooks about them in daytime. I agree that 2007 is long ago, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I still don't buy into the notion that people are more interested in hooks about the country they live in, which is what you're both assuming. I'm also not certain people generally write about the country they live in - I often don't.

I don't try to sell that. - We had a problem with Kreuzschule (assumed copy-vio, which wasn't), that I could have easily solved in a minute, whereas a different editor spent hours. So perhaps it's worth looking if a main contributor will we awake, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Composition roller

Nyttend (talk 11:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1969 Curaçao uprising

I reviewed your DYK for the 1969 Curaçao uprising. I found the video unhelpful and deleted it. For me to approve it for promotion, could you please cite the sentence I mentioned, regarding the $40 million in damages? I think the DYK would be ready for promotion after that. Leave me a talkback after that to let me know that you added the reference. Thanks! - ʈucoxn\^talk 00:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Het Vrije Woord

Hello! Your submission of Het Vrije Woord at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1969 Curaçao uprising

Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Panchakanya_(Hinduism)

Please take a look. We have addressed your concern. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Promotion of "Re Fong Thin Choo" to DYK: Minor error

Hi, thanks for promoting "Re Fong Thin Choo" to "Template:Did you know/Queue/2". The "(building pictured)" phrase in the hook needs to be deleted as the suggested image was not used. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dweir Baabda

Hello! Your submission of Dweir Baabda at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chamal ^T•C 11:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Coronal cloud

Hello! Your submission of Coronal cloud at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Carnival of Huejotzingo

Orlady (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Did you know/Removed

Carabinieri, I'm guessing that the Removed page wasn't around when you were last active on DYK. Basically, every promoted hook that is manually removed from a prep area, queue, or the main page DYK section should be noted here, including the reason it was pulled back. I've just added the Christina Maranci page; if there have been any others, please add them. (Note that this doesn't involve hooks swapped between prep areas or prep and queue, just ones that have been removed altogether, usually involving the reversal of a template promotion.) Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. The reason I hadn't listed the nomination on the Removed page is that I hd promoted it only very briefly and didn't feel much damage had been done. Anyway, thanks for straightening that out for me.--Carabinieri (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Christina Maranci

Issues of notability have been fixed. Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:27, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK Hook for Albert Stevens

Note: This is for DYK that is about to go live. (In Queue 5 Template:Did_you_know/Queue)

I wonder if there is still time to edit the hook for Albert Stevens? There was a lot of discussion and hashing out of the hook originally, but it seems a bit hard to parse in its current form. This is semantics perhaps.

Current:

• ... that for a Manhattan Project experiment Albert Stevens was secretly injected with what was expected to be a lethal dose of plutonium, and paid for providing samples of his urine and feces?

How about this:

• ... that during a Manhattan Project experiment, Albert Stevens was paid for providing samples of his urine and feces after he received a secret injection of plutonium?

I think that is more concise, and I added a comma where I think it's needed. Thanks for looking at this and your other work! I like to saw logs! (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for not getting around to this in time. I'd suggest taking issues like that to WT:DYK.--Carabinieri (talk) 22:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Coronal cloud

Carabinieri (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Problem with CITIPEG hook

To be aware: Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Possible legal problems with DYK and hook in prep 2. No fault of yours, of course, this is something I've only just become aware of. Prioryman (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. It seems BlueMoonset has taken care of it.--Carabinieri (talk) 22:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, for the moment, though there is more work to be done to resolve this problem (don't worry, I'll take care of it). I'll notify you when I'm done so that you can re-review the article and what I anticipate will likely be a new hook. Prioryman (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Shavarsh Krissian DYK

Source has been added. Thank you for raising these concerns. Proudbolsahye (talk) 04:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Chen Be-yue

Gatoclass 00:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Graph power

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Apikoglu

I am trying to move the page to Apikoglu but theres already a page with a redirect on it. Its prohibiting me to do so. Proudbolsahye (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I've moved it for you.--Carabinieri (talk) 00:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Bark bread

Orlady (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Sameh Fahmi

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Stonebergia dyk

When you get a chance would you be able to give a review of my suggested alternative hook for the Stonebergia dyk? Thanks.--Kevmin § 16:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for not having reviewed it in the first place. Someone else has gotten around to it, so everything seems to be in order now.--Carabinieri (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Karsten Whitson

Carabinieri, Gatoclass has suggested a new ALT hook for this one. Since you were the one who objected to the various hook suggestions, can you please vet this one and give it the appropriate icon? Thank you.

I was also hoping to ask you that, when you raise objections to hooks or other matters in a review, that you include the appropriate icon at the beginning of your comment. Otherwise, if you leave the prior approval tick standing, it looks as if you're registering an issue, but that it isn't serious enough that it needs to stop the hook from being promoted, which is a very mixed message if you're saying a hook isn't interesting, a comment that usually means the hook should not be promoted. Another result of the new icon is that the hook will no longer show up in the # Verified column of the List of Hooks by Date table on the queue and nominations pages, so people looking to promote hooks won't waste time looking under a particular date. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of National Pyrotechnic Festival

Hello! Your submission of National Pyrotechnic Festival at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ruby 2010/2013 22:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Constantinople Massacre of 1821

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Mailov brothers DYK

I have replied and fixed the issues. Proudbolsahye (talk) 03:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Issues fixedProudbolsahye (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for SS Patria (1913)

Chamal ^T•C 16:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for National Pyrotechnic Festival

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mezquital Valley

Hello! Your submission of Mezquital Valley at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geology of Cyprus

Hello! Your submission of Geology of Cyprus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK talk page. Yoninah (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Željko Reiner

Hello! Your submission of Željko Reiner at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias ^talk 17:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mezquital Valley

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Geology of Cyprus

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Long-tailed Ground Roller FAC

Hello. I’d like to thank you for commenting on the Long-tailed Ground Roller’s FAC nearly a year ago, and apologize for having to step away from Wikipedia prior to the FAC’s completion to deal with my studies. I've gone through all of the old commentary and believe that I have resolved it. I’m confident I have the time to finish the FAC, and I have re-nominated the article here. I would greatly appreciate it if you could give the article another look. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 17:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

CITIPEG DYK review

Could I please ask you to take a fresh look at Template:Did you know nominations/CITIPEG‎, which you reviewed earlier? Prioryman (talk) 22:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:FOUR RFC

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of North Sea Airways for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Sea Airways is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Sea Airways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gidonb (talk) 01:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Better late than never department

		The Original Barnstar
		For your outstanding work in 2007 and 2008 on Free Association of German Trade Unions — an excellent contribution to Labor History on Wikipedia. Please do come back to WP when you find time in your life for it. Carrite (talk) 13:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of German Metal Workers' Union

Hello! Your submission of German Metal Workers' Union at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mackensen (talk) 04:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/1 (2013 film)

I numbered your comments so that we can get them all properly addressed. Sorry for the presumption on my part, but I don't want there to be a failure to communicate. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

That's fine. Note that the second part of 6 refers to the sentence I quoted in 5.--Carabinieri (talk) 17:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm letting C TtT have at it. We'll see how he does. I don't want to be a cross purposes with his good offices. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Carabinieri, were you planning on coming back to this review, or are you still waiting for more from Tony? It seems like he thinks he's addressed all the issues you raised, though the comments there were made at just about the same time as the above comments here. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Resysop

Hi Carabinieri, welcome back. I've restored your administrator tools, per the WP:RESYSOP process. Do please make sure you've familiarised yourself with any changes in the areas you work since you left and I hope you stay! Worm^TT(talk) 06:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.--Carabinieri (talk) 07:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Maxwell and Tuke and Template:Did you know nominations/Maxwell and Tuke

I appreciate your efforts.
Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but maybe we should have a formal Alternate on the DYK before it is closed. Could add — "at the time Britain's two tallest buildings." Just a suggestion?
I would have replied on the nomination page, but it is now closed and I don't want to transgress. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:05, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

I don't think more formalities are necessary. Technically, the article doesn't say that those two towers were Britain's tallest buildings at the time. It only says that the first tower was the tallest building when it was built and that the second tower was taller than the first. Another tower, taller than the first, could have been built in between. Unless the article clearly states that the two towers were the country's tallest at the time the second one was and this fact is sourced, I'd be hesitant to add that to the hook.--Carabinieri (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Prep 4 We could add that to the article, but I am well satisified with your work. I was only concerned because some of us at DYK get hung up on procedural niceities, even when they are really superfluous.

As to the final result, Gilding lillies so to speak. Thanks 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

FYI, it says it now. But I'm leaving it all up to you. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Carabinieri, please don't blame yourself. Hindsight is 20/20. Sorry for misleading you, but I was in good faith. We both dealt with the received wisdom, and it was wrong and common knowledge. Who'd-a-thought? Fran did a great job catching that. I will correct all the involved articles tomorrow. Have real life work to do today. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Oh no, I don't blame myself or you. It was just a case of a source that appeared reliable containing a mistake. It happens; good thing it was caught.--Carabinieri (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for German Metal Workers' Union

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Constantin Doncea

Greetings and thanks for your review. I think I've now fulfilled the criteria, but if there's anything else to do before the hook is approved, do let me know. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:26, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the Pedro de Atarés nomination. It's well sourced with online refs for verification. Hope the Borgias don't try to poison me for this. Best regards, --Maragm (talk) 05:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Herdla Airport

Hello! Your submission of Herdla Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yunshui ^雲_水 11:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Gertrude Guillaume-Schack

Hello! Your submission of Gertrude Guillaume-Schack at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 14:09, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pedro de Atarés

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julius Fromm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Julius Fromm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 06:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, this was my mistake. Thought I was looking at a new page rather than one someone had just vandalized. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Gertrude Guillaume-Schack

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Page reverted

Hello,

I have searched in vain for the good path to get administrator’s help for the following issue and so I decided to send this request to some including you.

I have considerably expanded the article Guerrilla filmmaking and took care in referencing it as far as I could (over 90 links to trustful sources). I am an experienced editor of Wikipedia. For my surprise, the article was reverted by user CIRT to a preceding stub version mainly consisting of a very narrow list of films. Many important contents were removed. Self promotional vandalism seems to be the reason of such intervention, sustained by acute threats. I do not intend to respond with helpless and inconsequent arguments and the time I have to dedicate to Wikipedia is quite limited.

I’d be happy if you could pay some attention to this occurrence and let you decide whatever you think is reasonable.

My best,

Tertulius (User talk:Tertulius) 04,48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Herdla Airport

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Peter Landrock

Hello Carabinieri, I created a page about the Danish cryptographer Peter Landrock under: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Peter_Landrock Landrock was doctoral student under Richard Brauer who's page was created by you. I would appreciate if you could have a look at Peter Landrock's draft page. I will still add some final touches and references (e.g., on his awards). Would you have some suggestions on modifications or additional information for this page? A short comment on the draft page's talk section would be very much appreciated (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Peter_Landrock). --ScienceGuard (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Deutsch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Max Deutsch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ae9000ae (talk) 20:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• Speedy deletion declined - there's easily sufficient to establish context. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Carabinieri. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Carabinieri.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Support! Wiki needs to change some admins who don't catch up with new knowledge or the changing world! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windy.w.k.smith (talk • contribs) 08:08, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carabinieri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Rocker German sources

Hey, would you still have copies of the German sources you added to Rudolf Rocker? Wanted to check the citations (see recent edit history re: challenged statements) czar 06:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

@Carabinieri, unwatching this page now but please do {{ping}} if you have these sources available czar 16:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Czar: Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. You caught me while I was away from Wikipedia. I don't have the sources right now (I got them all from the library). I was planning on doing a little more work on the Rocker article eventually, but only once I get done with a few other projects. I'll get the sources again then. Were you referring to these challenged statements? It's been a long time since I added that, but I'm pretty sure those claims are backed up by the sources.--Carabinieri (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks, just wanted to check. Let me know if you need a reader when you get around to the article czar 00:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Yep, for posterity, looks like you added those claims [1] [2], so they should show up in the current source czar 00:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Carabinieri! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:34, Sunday, May 20, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Tina Strobos

Hi Carabinieri -- thanks for reviewing (and passing!) my GA nomination of Tina Strobos. I appreciate you taking the time. All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Alanna the Brave, you're welcome, great job on the article.--Carabinieri (talk) 12:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

HumanLight Good Article Nomination

I believe I have addressed your concern related to primary sources at HumanLight for your Good Article review. Thanks for your time. --Airborne84 (talk) 03:32, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syndicalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Big Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ludwig Baumann

The article Ludwig Baumann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. » Shadowowl | talk 09:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi User:shadowowl, I don't object to this being deleted. I created the article when I was new to Wikipedia and didn't know any better.--Carabinieri (talk) 14:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for teaching me to vet my sources. I'll be doing that from now on, especially with self-published sources. Vami_IV† 15:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Vami IV: Thanks.--Carabinieri (talk) 23:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Schapiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Oei Hui-lan

Hi, do check my latest edits. Thank you. ClaraElisaOng (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1969 Curaçao uprising

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1969 Curaçao uprising you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1969 Curaçao uprising

The article 1969 Curaçao uprising you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1969 Curaçao uprising for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1969 Curaçao uprising

The article 1969 Curaçao uprising you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1969 Curaçao uprising for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Carabinieri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

GAN reviews

Hi. I have been looking at old reviews and trying to prod any on that have stalled. I notice your name coming up at a few of them. Is there any way I can help you close up some of these reviews? AIRcorn (talk) 22:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi User:Aircorn, I really need to apologize for not completing those reviews. A lot of stuff came up that prevented me from editing for the last couple of months. I shouldn't open that many reviews at the same time in the future. I should also apologize to some of the other people involved in those nominations and to those who were involved in cleaning up the mess I left. Sorry, User:Catrìona, User: Rhododendrites, User:Clara dari Semarang, User:Ipigott, User:Underlying lk, User:SshibumXZ, User:Lee Vilenski, User:BlueMoonset.--Carabinieri (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

For my part, I just noticed a stale nomination. Can't blame you for not sticking around for months on end as the process is on hold. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anarchism in Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Owens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Precious

trade unions

Thank you for quality articles such as Abba Hillel Silver and Shapour Bakhtiar (2005), Free Association of German Trade Unions and Trade unions in Tanzania (2007), for German Metal Workers' Union (2014), for admin services, GA and FA reviewing, for joining the protest against "arbitrary, opaque, and dictatorial office-banning", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda. I really appreciate your kind words.--Carabinieri (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you today for 1969 Curaçao uprising, "a major event in the history of a small country"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Attack page tagging

Hello, Carabinieri,

While I agree with your tagging of User:Jtrainor/Summary of Fram Drama as a BLP violation, generally we inform the creator of pages that we tag for deletion. This happens automatically if you use Twinkle and set up your Preferences. I will notify Jtrainor that his page was deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi User:Liz. Thanks for the heads-up, I'll make sure to do so in the future.--Carabinieri (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
336		Motion Picture & Television Country House and Hospital (talk)	Add sources
14		International Libertarian Solidarity (talk)	Add sources
105		Florence Lawrence (talk)	Add sources
83		Platformism (talk)	Add sources
543		Communist International (talk)	Add sources
49		Michele Bianchi (talk)	Add sources
69		Anarchism in Russia (talk)	Cleanup
409		Ustashe (talk)	Cleanup
38		Fourth International (post-reunification) (talk)	Cleanup
18		Anarchism in Chile (talk)	Expand
4,823		Kia Motors (talk)	Expand
26		Anarchism in Brazil (talk)	Expand
78		Ultra-leftism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
56		Anti-corporate activism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
404		Non-aggression principle (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
11		Politics of Curaçao (talk)	Merge
78		Collective ownership (talk)	Merge
143		Félix Guattari (talk)	Merge
155		Persecution of Serbs in the Independent State of Croatia (talk)	Wikify
10		Blessed Martyrs of Drina (talk)	Wikify
51		Catholic clergy involvement with the Ustaše (talk)	Wikify
1		Leopoldo Ramos Giménez (talk)	Orphan
4		George Hindori (talk)	Orphan
3		Sherwin Cijntje (talk)	Orphan
3		Federación Anarco-Comunista de Argentina (talk)	Stub
3		Uruguayan Anarchist Federation (talk)	Stub
2		Julio López Chávez (talk)	Stub
5		Karl-Petter Thorwaldsson (talk)	Stub
4		Columna Libertaria Joaquin Penina (talk)	Stub
12		Anselmo Lorenzo (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Anarchism in Brazil

Hi Carabinieri, I see that you have some interest in anarchism and syndicalism in Latin America. I'm a editor from the Wikipedia in Portuguese and I wrote the article Anarchism in Brazil there. Let me know if you need some help, I'll be glad to collaborate with you, although my writing in English is not so good since my native language is Portuguese. I appreciate your work here and I even translated your article on the Free Association of German Trade Unions for the Wiki-PT. Estranhononinho (talk) 16:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi User:Estranhononinho, I'll give you a heads-up when I get around to the article. Thanks.Carabinieri (talk) 19:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Ciao!

Ciao! Come stai oggi? Grazie per i tuoi articoli! Molto benvenuto a Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge! L'italiano è una lingua molto bella BTW!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for supported my recent, albeit unsuccessful RfA. Your support was greatly appreciated.Looking forward to further collaboration. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

1969 Curaçao uprising scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that 1969 Curaçao uprising has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 20 November 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 20, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 15:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

FYI, a couple quotations in the article have been marked with. Some editors like to see these immediately after a quote, for ease of verification. If you could double-check the sources and put citations there, it'd save any problems at WP:ERRORS. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Organized labour project

Hi - I noticed you are one of the original members of the organized labour project. I'm contacting active original members as the project has fallen inactive of late and have a couple of thoughts of getting things moving again:

• redesign of the project page using the new project x tool - some examples here Wikipedia:WikiProject_X/Dashboard
• trying to identify editors to focus on regional levels - esp. Africa, MENA and Asia
• start a newsletter
• targeted work on gender and unions (eg seeking support from projects on women, feminism, making women blue etc)
• generalised encouragement of editors involved (eg a Stakhanovite barnstar...not being completely facetious)

--Goldsztajn (talk) 12:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)