Open main menu
Nuvola apps personal unisex.png Nuvola apps filetypes.svg Crystal kdict.png Nuvola apps package editors.png Crystal package settings.png Nuvola apps bookcase.png Nuvola actions help.svg Original Barnstar Hires.png
User Talk Articles To Do Toolbox Subpages DYK Awards

Welcome to my talk page. Leave me a message!

Ledblue.svg I'm sporadic on Wikipedia these days, but feel free to email me where you will probably get a fairly swift response.

Obscured jaguar.jpgThis user is stalked by friendly talk page staplers.Swingline-stapler.jpg
Question mark.svgThis user replies where s/he likes, and is inconsistent in that respect.

Contents

Yo Ho HoEdit

ThanksEdit

Thanks, Dave, for offering to help at Fermat's Last Theorem. It is appreciated. --RexxS (talk) 23:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Not a problem. Been a while since I did something useful ;) WormTT(talk) 08:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry to come back to you, Dave, but I'm getting close to the end of my tether with the antics of some of the commentators at the the RfC Talk:Fermat's Last Theorem #Request for comment (RfC) on inclusion of Infobox mathematical statement. There has been continual personalisation, strawmen arguments, and tangential nonsense. I asked a week ago for the talk page to be explicitly placed under AC/DS per WP:ARBINFOBOX #Editors reminded's "decorum and civility" remedy at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement #Infobox RfC on Fermat's Last Theorem, but it's been ignored. I feel as though the only recourse to get that RfC back on the rails is to start ANI proceedings against several editors that I feel are abusing the RfC, which will be messy. Before I start, would you look at the RfC and tell me whether you think the standard of debate in there is acceptable, please? --RexxS (talk) 17:49, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
I've done my best to keep away from it, with a view to closing it later, especially as I don't really have time to monitor it properly. Unfortunately, I don't feel I should be adding enforcement, as a sitting arb, I try not to get involved with AE at all. Not that I ever really did it when I was not a sitting arb! I'm surprised it's been completely ignored though. Unfortunately, I'm not likely to be around to review things properly over the weekend - I don't generally use wikipedia at all during that time, but if things are still the same on Monday, I'll have a look. WormTT(talk) 19:10, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Okay, sorry, Dave, I wasn't thinking about you possibly closing it. In which case, you should definitely keep away. I'm not feeling quite so bad, as another editor (from the opposite side of the arguments} has just backed me up in trying to keep the debate focused on the actual issue. Hopefully it will settle down now. --RexxS (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

───────────────────────── Hey! Just a note that the RfC has reached maturity now, so feel free to close it to your judgment and at your convenience. Thanks again for your help. — MarkH21 (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

ANI NoticeEdit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. You are only tangentially involved, but since I mentioned your recommendation for context I felt that it would be proper to inform you. — MarkH21 (talk) 23:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RexxS/Bureaucrat chatEdit

I've opened a bureaucrat chat for a current RfA. Your input would be most appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RexxS/Bureaucrat chat. Best regards, Maxim(talk) 22:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Worm That Turned".